sagaz-ai 0.3.2 → 0.4.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (45) hide show
  1. package/CHANGELOG.md +121 -0
  2. package/README.md +6 -0
  3. package/RELEASE_NOTES.md +21 -21
  4. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/INDEX.md +39 -0
  5. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/README.md +10 -0
  6. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/evals/golden-output-evaluation.md +79 -0
  7. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/evals/sagaz-evaluation-suite.md +34 -0
  8. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/golden-outputs/README.md +48 -0
  9. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/golden-outputs/design-handoff-output.md +77 -0
  10. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/golden-outputs/implementation-plan-output.md +78 -0
  11. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/golden-outputs/memory-proposal-output.md +63 -0
  12. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/golden-outputs/product-handoff-output.md +76 -0
  13. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/golden-outputs/project-audit-output.md +70 -0
  14. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/golden-outputs/qa-release-output.md +68 -0
  15. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/manifest.json +35 -0
  16. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/onboarding/README.md +89 -0
  17. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/onboarding/design.md +95 -0
  18. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/onboarding/engineering.md +94 -0
  19. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/onboarding/handoff-examples.md +114 -0
  20. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/onboarding/product-pm.md +97 -0
  21. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/onboarding/qa-release.md +94 -0
  22. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/prompts/README.md +43 -0
  23. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/prompts/design-figma.md +66 -0
  24. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/prompts/implementation.md +69 -0
  25. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/prompts/memory.md +59 -0
  26. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/prompts/project-start.md +73 -0
  27. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/prompts/qa-release.md +65 -0
  28. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/protocols/generated-code-linting.md +103 -0
  29. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/protocols/stack-selection.md +90 -18
  30. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/stack-playbooks/nextjs-vercel-supabase.md +6 -4
  31. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/stack-presets/admin-dashboard.md +2 -1
  32. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/stack-presets/nextjs-vercel.md +4 -1
  33. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/stack-presets/node-api.md +2 -1
  34. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/stack-presets/react-vite.md +2 -1
  35. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/stack-presets/supabase.md +4 -0
  36. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/tasks/implementation-build.md +3 -2
  37. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/tasks/verification-qa.md +1 -0
  38. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/training/README.md +61 -0
  39. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/training/day-1-first-project-audit.md +62 -0
  40. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/training/day-2-product-to-design.md +76 -0
  41. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/training/day-3-design-to-implementation.md +73 -0
  42. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/training/day-4-qa-release.md +71 -0
  43. package/ai-orchestration-ecosystem/training/day-5-operational-memory.md +74 -0
  44. package/package.json +1 -1
  45. package/scripts/verify-package.js +211 -1
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
1
+ # Handoff Examples
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ Provide short examples of good Sagaz handoffs between product, design, engineering, QA, and release work.
6
+
7
+ ## Use When
8
+
9
+ - A team member is learning what a Sagaz handoff should contain.
10
+ - A project needs consistent phase transitions.
11
+ - A reviewer wants to compare a handoff against the expected shape.
12
+
13
+ ## Invocation
14
+
15
+ Ask Sagaz to produce a handoff for the next role:
16
+
17
+ ```text
18
+ Sagaz: prepare a handoff from the current role to the next role. Include context, evidence, risks, assumptions, and permission needed before the next step.
19
+ ```
20
+
21
+ ## Handoff
22
+
23
+ Use the examples below as calibration. A handoff should be short enough to scan and complete enough that the next role can continue without reconstructing the whole thread.
24
+
25
+ ## Product To Design
26
+
27
+ ```md
28
+ Handoff: Product to Design
29
+ Goal: Create scheduling flow for small service businesses.
30
+ Users: Owner, staff member, customer.
31
+ Scope: Booking, reschedule, cancellation, admin calendar.
32
+ Non-goals: Payments in this release.
33
+ Acceptance criteria:
34
+ - Customer can book an available time.
35
+ - Owner can see bookings by day.
36
+ - Staff conflicts are prevented.
37
+ Risks:
38
+ - Calendar timezone behavior needs engineering review.
39
+ Next squad: Design Studio
40
+ Permission needed: approve UX exploration.
41
+ ```
42
+
43
+ ## Design To Engineering
44
+
45
+ ```md
46
+ Handoff: Design to Engineering
47
+ Screens covered: calendar, booking form, confirmation, empty state, error state.
48
+ Components: date picker, time slot list, booking summary, status banner.
49
+ Responsive notes: mobile single-column, desktop split calendar/detail view.
50
+ Accessibility: keyboard focus states and form labels required.
51
+ Assets: Figma link or local design references.
52
+ Next squad: Product Factory or Implementation Engineer
53
+ Permission needed: approve implementation.
54
+ ```
55
+
56
+ ## Engineering To QA
57
+
58
+ ```md
59
+ Handoff: Engineering to QA
60
+ Files changed:
61
+ - src/features/scheduling/*
62
+ - src/components/calendar/*
63
+ Commands run:
64
+ - npm test
65
+ - npm run build
66
+ Behavior verified:
67
+ - booking creation
68
+ - unavailable slot prevention
69
+ Residual risk:
70
+ - timezone edge cases need manual QA.
71
+ Next squad: QA Verifier
72
+ Permission needed: approve broader regression pass.
73
+ ```
74
+
75
+ ## QA To Release
76
+
77
+ ```md
78
+ Handoff: QA to Release
79
+ Verification:
80
+ - unit tests passed
81
+ - build passed
82
+ - manual booking flow passed on desktop and mobile viewport
83
+ Release blockers: none
84
+ Risks accepted:
85
+ - timezone behavior limited to configured business timezone.
86
+ Rollback:
87
+ - revert release commit
88
+ - redeploy previous known-good build
89
+ Next squad: GitHub Ops
90
+ Permission needed: approve commit, tag, release, deploy, or publish.
91
+ ```
92
+
93
+ ## Release To Maintenance
94
+
95
+ ```md
96
+ Handoff: Release to Maintenance
97
+ Released version: vX.Y.Z
98
+ Published artifacts:
99
+ - GitHub release
100
+ - deployment URL
101
+ - package version, when applicable
102
+ Monitoring:
103
+ - check runtime logs
104
+ - check user-reported booking failures
105
+ Follow-up:
106
+ - add timezone regression test
107
+ - review operational memory preference for release cadence
108
+ Next squad: Maintenance Ops
109
+ Permission needed: approve follow-up issue creation.
110
+ ```
111
+
112
+ ## Verification
113
+
114
+ A good handoff is complete when another role can continue without rereading the whole thread.
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
1
+ # Product And PM Onboarding
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ Help product owners and PMs use Sagaz to turn goals into clear scope, requirements, risks, and implementation-ready handoffs.
6
+
7
+ ## Use When
8
+
9
+ - Starting a new product, feature, or experiment.
10
+ - Clarifying scope before design or engineering.
11
+ - Comparing tradeoffs, cost, timeline, or risk.
12
+ - Preparing a product handoff for implementation.
13
+
14
+ ## Invocation
15
+
16
+ Start with the business outcome, users, constraints, and definition of done.
17
+
18
+ ```text
19
+ Sagaz: act as the product team for this feature.
20
+
21
+ Goal:
22
+ -
23
+
24
+ Users:
25
+ -
26
+
27
+ Constraints:
28
+ -
29
+
30
+ Definition of done:
31
+ -
32
+
33
+ Do not implement yet. Produce the product brief, risks, assumptions, and recommended next squad.
34
+ ```
35
+
36
+ ## Required Inputs
37
+
38
+ - Product goal.
39
+ - Target users.
40
+ - Must-have and nice-to-have behavior.
41
+ - Business constraints.
42
+ - Deadline or milestone, when relevant.
43
+ - Known risks or open questions.
44
+ - Approval boundaries.
45
+
46
+ ## Expected Output
47
+
48
+ - Product brief.
49
+ - Scope boundaries.
50
+ - Assumptions and questions.
51
+ - Acceptance criteria.
52
+ - Recommended workflow and squad.
53
+ - Permission needed before design, architecture, or implementation.
54
+
55
+ ## Handoff
56
+
57
+ Product handoff should include:
58
+
59
+ - Problem statement.
60
+ - User stories or jobs.
61
+ - Acceptance criteria.
62
+ - Non-goals.
63
+ - Risks.
64
+ - Open questions.
65
+ - Recommended next role: design, technology, architecture, or implementation.
66
+
67
+ ## Good Prompts
68
+
69
+ ```text
70
+ Sagaz: transform this idea into a product spec and tell me what is missing before design starts.
71
+ ```
72
+
73
+ ```text
74
+ Sagaz: compare three implementation scopes for this feature: lean MVP, standard release, and premium version.
75
+ ```
76
+
77
+ ```text
78
+ Sagaz: prepare a handoff for engineering, but first identify assumptions that still need approval.
79
+ ```
80
+
81
+ ## Common Mistakes
82
+
83
+ - Asking for implementation before scope is stable.
84
+ - Hiding non-goals.
85
+ - Omitting target users.
86
+ - Treating assumptions as requirements.
87
+ - Skipping acceptance criteria.
88
+
89
+ ## Verification
90
+
91
+ Before approving the next phase, confirm:
92
+
93
+ - The scope is understandable.
94
+ - Acceptance criteria are testable.
95
+ - Non-goals are explicit.
96
+ - Risks and tradeoffs are visible.
97
+ - The next squad is appropriate.
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
1
+ # QA And Release Onboarding
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ Help QA, release reviewers, and maintainers use Sagaz for verification, release readiness, GitHub operations, and rollback planning.
6
+
7
+ ## Use When
8
+
9
+ - Reviewing a completed implementation.
10
+ - Preparing a release.
11
+ - Checking CI/CD readiness.
12
+ - Creating release notes.
13
+ - Auditing risk before deploy or publish.
14
+
15
+ ## Invocation
16
+
17
+ Ask Sagaz to verify evidence and identify gaps.
18
+
19
+ ```text
20
+ Sagaz: act as QA and release reviewer for this change.
21
+
22
+ Review:
23
+ - behavior
24
+ - tests
25
+ - build
26
+ - accessibility or visual QA if relevant
27
+ - deployment readiness
28
+ - rollback plan
29
+
30
+ Do not push, tag, release, deploy, or publish without asking approval.
31
+ ```
32
+
33
+ ## Required Inputs
34
+
35
+ - Change summary.
36
+ - Expected behavior.
37
+ - Test commands.
38
+ - Deployment target.
39
+ - Release target.
40
+ - Known risks.
41
+ - Approval boundaries.
42
+
43
+ ## Expected Output
44
+
45
+ - QA report.
46
+ - Verification evidence.
47
+ - Missing test or build gaps.
48
+ - Release readiness decision.
49
+ - Rollback plan.
50
+ - GitHub or deployment operation proposal.
51
+
52
+ ## Handoff
53
+
54
+ QA/release handoff should include:
55
+
56
+ - What was verified.
57
+ - Commands and results.
58
+ - Manual checks.
59
+ - Risks accepted or unresolved.
60
+ - Release notes draft.
61
+ - Rollback steps.
62
+ - Approval needed before remote operations.
63
+
64
+ ## Good Prompts
65
+
66
+ ```text
67
+ Sagaz: review this branch for release readiness and list blockers before any GitHub operation.
68
+ ```
69
+
70
+ ```text
71
+ Sagaz: prepare release notes, rollback plan, and GitHub release proposal. Do not publish yet.
72
+ ```
73
+
74
+ ```text
75
+ Sagaz: inspect CI failures and tell me the smallest safe fix path.
76
+ ```
77
+
78
+ ## Common Mistakes
79
+
80
+ - Publishing before evidence is complete.
81
+ - Forgetting rollback.
82
+ - Skipping manual checks for UI changes.
83
+ - Treating unreviewed CI failures as acceptable.
84
+ - Mixing local success with production readiness.
85
+
86
+ ## Verification
87
+
88
+ Before release approval, confirm:
89
+
90
+ - Required checks passed.
91
+ - Known risks are explicit.
92
+ - Rollback plan is usable.
93
+ - Changelog or release notes are ready.
94
+ - GitHub/deploy/package operations have explicit approval.
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
1
+ # Prompt Matrix
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ Provide copy-ready Sagaz prompts for common project, design, engineering, QA, release, and memory scenarios.
6
+
7
+ Use these prompts when a user or team member knows the desired outcome but does not yet know which Sagaz workflow, squad, or protocol to invoke.
8
+
9
+ ## Use When
10
+
11
+ - Starting a new project.
12
+ - Auditing an existing repository.
13
+ - Asking for Figma MCP or design work.
14
+ - Implementing a feature.
15
+ - Fixing a bug.
16
+ - Preparing QA or release.
17
+ - Creating operational memory.
18
+ - Requesting review without file changes.
19
+
20
+ ## Prompt Rules
21
+
22
+ - Start with `Sagaz:`.
23
+ - Include goal, constraints, definition of done, and risk level when known.
24
+ - State whether Sagaz may change files.
25
+ - State whether external tools, MCPs, GitHub, deployment, or package publishing are allowed.
26
+ - Ask Sagaz to identify workflow, squad, permission level, and first handoff.
27
+
28
+ ## Prompt Families
29
+
30
+ - `project-start.md`: new projects and existing project audits.
31
+ - `design-figma.md`: design, UX, UI, Figma MCP, and visual QA.
32
+ - `implementation.md`: feature implementation, refactors, and bug fixes.
33
+ - `qa-release.md`: verification, release readiness, GitHub, deploy, and publishing.
34
+ - `memory.md`: project or team operational memory.
35
+
36
+ ## Verification
37
+
38
+ Before using a prompt in production work, confirm:
39
+
40
+ - It says whether file changes are allowed.
41
+ - It names external operation limits.
42
+ - It asks for evidence and risks.
43
+ - It leaves room for Sagaz to inspect the current project before acting.
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
1
+ # Design And Figma Prompts
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ Provide prompts for UX, UI, design systems, visual QA, and Figma MCP workflows.
6
+
7
+ ## Use When
8
+
9
+ - The team needs mockups, app flows, UI states, or design systems.
10
+ - Designers want Sagaz to coordinate Figma MCP.
11
+ - Engineering needs implementation-ready design handoff.
12
+
13
+ ## Prompt: UX Flow
14
+
15
+ ```text
16
+ Sagaz: act as the design team and create a UX flow for this product.
17
+
18
+ Users:
19
+ -
20
+
21
+ Core tasks:
22
+ -
23
+
24
+ Screens:
25
+ -
26
+
27
+ Do not use external connectors yet. Produce screen map, states, accessibility notes, and design handoff.
28
+ ```
29
+
30
+ ## Prompt: Figma MCP Mockup
31
+
32
+ ```text
33
+ Sagaz: coordinate the design team using Figma MCP to create app-like mockups that can be inspected as real application flows.
34
+
35
+ Include:
36
+ - target users
37
+ - main screens
38
+ - empty/loading/error/success states
39
+ - component states
40
+ - interaction notes
41
+ - responsive considerations
42
+ - visual QA checklist
43
+
44
+ Ask before using Figma MCP or writing to external design files.
45
+ ```
46
+
47
+ ## Prompt: Visual QA
48
+
49
+ ```text
50
+ Sagaz: review this UI with the design and visual QA team.
51
+
52
+ Check:
53
+ - layout consistency
54
+ - typography
55
+ - spacing
56
+ - accessibility
57
+ - responsiveness
58
+ - component states
59
+ - visual regressions
60
+
61
+ Do not change files until you list findings and ask for approval.
62
+ ```
63
+
64
+ ## Verification
65
+
66
+ A good design response should include states, accessibility, responsive behavior, implementation constraints, and permission needed for Figma or file changes.
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
1
+ # Implementation Prompts
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ Provide prompts for engineering implementation, refactors, and bug fixes.
6
+
7
+ ## Use When
8
+
9
+ - Adding a feature.
10
+ - Fixing a bug.
11
+ - Refactoring code.
12
+ - Implementing from a product or design handoff.
13
+
14
+ ## Prompt: Feature Implementation
15
+
16
+ ```text
17
+ Sagaz: implement this feature using the existing project patterns.
18
+
19
+ Feature:
20
+ -
21
+
22
+ Acceptance criteria:
23
+ -
24
+
25
+ Constraints:
26
+ - keep the diff focused
27
+ - avoid unrelated refactors
28
+ - run proportional tests
29
+
30
+ Inspect the project first, propose the plan, then proceed if the request already clearly authorizes implementation.
31
+ ```
32
+
33
+ ## Prompt: Bug Fix
34
+
35
+ ```text
36
+ Sagaz: diagnose and fix this bug.
37
+
38
+ Bug:
39
+ -
40
+
41
+ Expected behavior:
42
+ -
43
+
44
+ Observed behavior:
45
+ -
46
+
47
+ Find the likely root cause, make the smallest safe fix, run focused tests, and prepare a handoff with residual risk.
48
+ ```
49
+
50
+ ## Prompt: Safe Refactor
51
+
52
+ ```text
53
+ Sagaz: refactor this area safely.
54
+
55
+ Target:
56
+ -
57
+
58
+ Rules:
59
+ - preserve behavior
60
+ - keep public contracts stable
61
+ - add or run tests proportional to risk
62
+ - document rollback or recovery notes
63
+
64
+ Do not broaden scope without asking.
65
+ ```
66
+
67
+ ## Verification
68
+
69
+ A good implementation response should include files inspected, files changed, commands run, tests, behavior checked, and residual risk.
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
1
+ # Operational Memory Prompts
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ Provide prompts for creating, reviewing, applying, and updating Sagaz operational memory.
6
+
7
+ ## Use When
8
+
9
+ - The team wants to preserve recurring preferences.
10
+ - A project needs durable Sagaz context.
11
+ - A preference should apply across future runs.
12
+ - Existing memory needs review or cleanup.
13
+
14
+ ## Prompt: Propose Memory
15
+
16
+ ```text
17
+ Sagaz: propose operational memory for this project.
18
+
19
+ Include:
20
+ - stable team preferences
21
+ - stack preferences
22
+ - design expectations
23
+ - testing expectations
24
+ - GitHub and release preferences
25
+ - stop conditions
26
+
27
+ Do not write files yet. Propose the memory content, scope, source, risk, review date, and ask for approval.
28
+ ```
29
+
30
+ ## Prompt: Apply Memory
31
+
32
+ ```text
33
+ Sagaz: inspect existing operational memory and tell me which preferences are relevant to this task.
34
+
35
+ Task:
36
+ -
37
+
38
+ Do not apply stale, risky, or conflicting preferences without asking.
39
+ ```
40
+
41
+ ## Prompt: Review Memory
42
+
43
+ ```text
44
+ Sagaz: review this project's operational memory.
45
+
46
+ Check:
47
+ - stale preferences
48
+ - unclear sources
49
+ - missing review dates
50
+ - risky assumptions
51
+ - conflicts with the current repository
52
+ - anything that should be deprecated
53
+
54
+ Do not update the file until I approve.
55
+ ```
56
+
57
+ ## Verification
58
+
59
+ A good memory response should include scope, source, confidence, permission impact, review date, and whether the preference is advisory or blocking.
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
1
+ # Project Start Prompts
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ Provide prompts for starting new projects, auditing existing repositories, and selecting the right Sagaz workflow.
6
+
7
+ ## Use When
8
+
9
+ - The user wants to begin a product or project.
10
+ - The user opens Sagaz inside an existing codebase.
11
+ - The team needs stack, workflow, risk, and next-step recommendations.
12
+
13
+ ## Prompt: New Product
14
+
15
+ ```text
16
+ Sagaz: start a new project using the smallest sufficient workflow.
17
+
18
+ Goal:
19
+ -
20
+
21
+ Users:
22
+ -
23
+
24
+ Constraints:
25
+ -
26
+
27
+ Definition of done:
28
+ -
29
+
30
+ Do not implement yet. Recommend workflow, squad, stack direction, risks, first artifacts, and permission needed for the next step.
31
+ ```
32
+
33
+ ## Prompt: Existing Project Audit
34
+
35
+ ```text
36
+ Sagaz: audit this project and tell me what workflow, stack playbook, risks, tests, and next implementation step you recommend. Do not change files yet.
37
+ ```
38
+
39
+ ## Prompt: Stack Recommendation
40
+
41
+ ```text
42
+ Sagaz: inspect the project goal and recommend a stack.
43
+
44
+ Compare options by:
45
+ - implementation speed
46
+ - cost
47
+ - maintainability
48
+ - deployment
49
+ - future changes
50
+ - team skill fit
51
+ - TypeScript strict compatibility
52
+ - Supabase fit for auth, relational data, storage, realtime, RLS, migrations, and generated types
53
+
54
+ Do not install dependencies or create files yet.
55
+ ```
56
+
57
+ ## Prompt: Resume A Project
58
+
59
+ ```text
60
+ Sagaz: resume this project from existing repository context.
61
+
62
+ First:
63
+ - inspect current files
64
+ - identify run state or handoff artifacts
65
+ - summarize what appears complete
66
+ - identify the safest next step
67
+
68
+ Do not change files until I approve the plan.
69
+ ```
70
+
71
+ ## Verification
72
+
73
+ A good project-start response should include selected workflow, squad, assumptions, risks, permission level, and next artifact.
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
1
+ # QA And Release Prompts
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ Provide prompts for QA, release readiness, GitHub operations, deployment, and package publishing.
6
+
7
+ ## Use When
8
+
9
+ - Verifying a change.
10
+ - Preparing a release.
11
+ - Auditing CI/CD readiness.
12
+ - Creating release notes or rollback plans.
13
+ - Publishing to npm or another registry.
14
+
15
+ ## Prompt: QA Review
16
+
17
+ ```text
18
+ Sagaz: review this change as QA.
19
+
20
+ Check:
21
+ - expected behavior
22
+ - regressions
23
+ - tests
24
+ - build
25
+ - accessibility or visual QA if relevant
26
+ - residual risk
27
+
28
+ Do not commit, push, deploy, tag, release, or publish.
29
+ ```
30
+
31
+ ## Prompt: Release Readiness
32
+
33
+ ```text
34
+ Sagaz: prepare release readiness for this project.
35
+
36
+ Include:
37
+ - version recommendation
38
+ - changelog or release notes
39
+ - verification evidence
40
+ - rollback plan
41
+ - GitHub operations needed
42
+ - deployment or publish operations needed
43
+
44
+ Do not execute remote operations until I approve.
45
+ ```
46
+
47
+ ## Prompt: GitHub Release
48
+
49
+ ```text
50
+ Sagaz: prepare a GitHub release proposal.
51
+
52
+ Include:
53
+ - commit summary
54
+ - tag name
55
+ - release title
56
+ - release notes
57
+ - checks required
58
+ - rollback plan
59
+
60
+ Ask before staging, committing, pushing, tagging, or creating the release.
61
+ ```
62
+
63
+ ## Verification
64
+
65
+ A good QA/release response should clearly distinguish local verification from remote release, deployment, or package publishing.