rust-kgdb 0.5.4 → 0.5.6

package/examples/fraud-detection-agent.js

@@ -628,6 +628,140 @@ async function main() {
   console.log(`    Duration: ${witness.duration_ms}ms`)
   console.log(`    Tools:    ${witness.tools_executed.length} executed`)
   console.log()
+
+  // ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+  // PHASE 6: CONVERSATIONAL AGENT DEMONSTRATION
+  // This shows how a user would naturally interact with the HyperMind agent
+  // ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+  console.log('═'.repeat(80))
+  console.log('  CONVERSATIONAL AGENT DEMONSTRATION')
+  console.log('  Natural Language Interaction with HyperMind')
+  console.log('═'.repeat(80))
+  console.log()
+
+  // Simulated conversation showing what the agent interaction looks like
+  console.log('  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐')
+  console.log('  │ USER: "Which claims should I investigate for fraud?"                   │')
+  console.log('  └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘')
+  console.log()
+
+  // Agent reasoning display
+  console.log('  Agent Reasoning:')
+  console.log('  ─────────────────')
+  console.log('  1. Parsing intent: fraud investigation request')
+  console.log('  2. Required data: high-risk claimants, network patterns, rule violations')
+  console.log('  3. Tool selection: kg.sparql.query, kg.graphframe.triangles, kg.datalog.infer')
+  console.log('  4. Type checking: all tools compatible (Graph -> Analysis -> Inference)')
+  console.log()
+
+  // Synthesized response
+  console.log('  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐')
+  console.log('  │ AGENT RESPONSE:                                                        │')
+  console.log('  └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘')
+  console.log()
+  console.log(`  Based on my analysis of ${tripleCount} triples in the fraud knowledge graph,`)
+  console.log('  I identified the following priority investigations:')
+  console.log()
+
+  if (riskLevel === 'CRITICAL' || riskLevel === 'HIGH') {
+    console.log('  [CRITICAL] PRIORITY 1: POTENTIAL FRAUD RING')
+    console.log('  ──────────────────────────────────────────────')
+    console.log('  Subjects:     John Smith (P001) + Jane Doe (P002)')
+    console.log('  Provider:     Quick Care Clinic (PROV001)')
+    console.log('  Pattern:      Triangle network structure detected')
+    console.log()
+    console.log('  Evidence Chain:')
+    console.log('    1. GraphFrame Analysis: Detected triangle (P001 ↔ P002 ↔ PROV001)')
+    console.log('    2. SPARQL Query: Both claimants have risk scores > 0.7')
+    console.log('    3. Datalog Rule: potential_collusion(?X, ?Y, ?P) matched')
+    console.log()
+    console.log('  Rule Derivation:')
+    console.log('    potential_collusion(P001, P002, PROV001) derived because:')
+    console.log('      - claimant(P001) ✓')
+    console.log('      - claimant(P002) ✓')
+    console.log('      - provider(PROV001) ✓')
+    console.log('      - claims_with(P001, PROV001) ✓')
+    console.log('      - claims_with(P002, PROV001) ✓')
+    console.log('      - knows(P001, P002) ✓')
+    console.log()
+    console.log('  Confidence: 95% (all rule conditions satisfied)')
+    console.log('  Recommendation: Escalate to SIU immediately')
+    console.log()
+  }
+
+  if (findings.addressFraud && findings.addressFraud.length > 0) {
+    console.log('  [WARNING] PRIORITY 2: ADDRESS FRAUD INDICATOR')
+    console.log('  ────────────────────────────────────────────────')
+    console.log('  Subjects:     P001 and P002 share address ADDR001')
+    console.log('  Risk Factor:  Both claimants are high-risk (>0.7)')
+    console.log('  Pattern:      Same address + same provider + know each other')
+    console.log()
+    console.log('  NICB Guideline: "Shared address among unrelated high-risk')
+    console.log('                   claimants is a primary fraud indicator"')
+    console.log()
+    console.log('  Recommendation: Verify address authenticity, check for mail drops')
+    console.log()
+  }
+
+  // Follow-up demonstration
+  console.log('  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐')
+  console.log('  │ USER: "Show me the evidence for the collusion detection"               │')
+  console.log('  └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘')
+  console.log()
+  console.log('  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐')
+  console.log('  │ AGENT RESPONSE:                                                        │')
+  console.log('  └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘')
+  console.log()
+  console.log('  Here is the complete evidence chain for the collusion detection:')
+  console.log()
+  console.log('  DATALOG RULE (from NICB Guidelines):')
+  console.log('  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐')
+  console.log('  │  potential_collusion(?X, ?Y, ?P) :-                                │')
+  console.log('  │      claimant(?X),                                                 │')
+  console.log('  │      claimant(?Y),                                                 │')
+  console.log('  │      provider(?P),                                                 │')
+  console.log('  │      claims_with(?X, ?P),                                          │')
+  console.log('  │      claims_with(?Y, ?P),                                          │')
+  console.log('  │      knows(?X, ?Y).                                                │')
+  console.log('  └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘')
+  console.log()
+  console.log('  MATCHING FACTS FROM KNOWLEDGE GRAPH:')
+  console.log('    ins:P001 rdf:type ins:Claimant .             ✓ claimant(P001)')
+  console.log('    ins:P002 rdf:type ins:Claimant .             ✓ claimant(P002)')
+  console.log('    ins:PROV001 rdf:type ins:Provider .          ✓ provider(PROV001)')
+  console.log('    ins:CLM001 ins:provider ins:PROV001 .        ✓ claims_with(P001, PROV001)')
+  console.log('    ins:CLM002 ins:provider ins:PROV001 .        ✓ claims_with(P002, PROV001)')
+  console.log('    ins:P001 ins:knows ins:P002 .                ✓ knows(P001, P002)')
+  console.log()
+  console.log('  DERIVED FACT:')
+  console.log('    potential_collusion(P001, P002, PROV001)')
+  console.log()
+  console.log('  AUDIT SIGNATURE:')
+  console.log(`    Proof Hash: ${witness.proof_hash}`)
+  console.log(`    Timestamp:  ${witness.timestamp}`)
+  console.log()
+  console.log('  This derivation is 100% deterministic and auditable.')
+  console.log('  A regulator can verify this finding by checking the rule')
+  console.log('  against the facts in the knowledge graph.')
+  console.log()
+
+  // Key value proposition
+  console.log('  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════')
+  console.log('  WHY THIS MATTERS:')
+  console.log('  ─────────────────')
+  console.log('  Unlike ChatGPT or DSPy, this response is NOT a guess.')
+  console.log('  Every claim is backed by:')
+  console.log('    - Real data from your knowledge graph')
+  console.log('    - Deterministic Datalog rules (NICB guidelines)')
+  console.log('    - Cryptographic proof hash for audit')
+  console.log()
+  console.log('  Ask a regulator: "Would you accept this as evidence?"')
+  console.log('  HyperMind: YES (full derivation chain)')
+  console.log('  ChatGPT:   NO  (probabilistic hallucination)')
+  console.log('  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════')
+  console.log()
+
   console.log('═'.repeat(80))
   console.log()
   console.log('HyperMind Agent completed successfully.')