rhachet-roles-ehmpathy 1.12.1 → 1.13.1

package/dist/logic/roles/bhrain/.briefs/physics/optics.focal.tradeoffs.md

@@ -1,107 +0,0 @@
-# .brief: focal.tradeoffs
-
-## what
-
-**focal.tradeoffs** describe the physical constraint that links:
-
-- **focal.acuity** — the fineness of detail resolvable **at the focal plane**
-- **focal.breadth** — the angular or spatial extent of the field of view (FoV)
-- **focal.distance** — the distance **from the lens to the focal plane**
-- **focal.depth** — the range of distances **around the focal plane** that remain acceptably sharp
-
-These four factors are coupled by the geometry of light: changing one requires compensating adjustments to at least one of the others. The relationship models the inescapable tradeoffs in all optical focus systems.
-
----
-
-## equation
-
-Assuming constant sensor size and fixed circle of confusion:
-
-\`\`\`ts
-// given
-focal.depth ∝ N² × focal.distance² × focal.breadth²
-focal.acuity ∝ 1 / N
-
-// then
-N ∝ 1 / focal.acuity
-focal.depth ∝ (1 / focal.acuity)² × focal.distance² × focal.breadth²
-focal.depth ∝ focal.distance² × focal.breadth² / focal.acuity²
-
-// therefore
-focal.acuity² × focal.depth ∝ focal.distance² × focal.breadth²
-\`\`\`
-
----
-
-## key relationship
-
-\`\`\`
-focal.acuity² × focal.depth ∝ focal.distance² × focal.breadth²
-\`\`\`
-
-> You can only maximize two at a time — the other two must yield.
-
----
-
-## variable meanings
-
-- **focal.acuity** — how finely your lens resolves detail at the point of focus
-- **focal.breadth** — how wide your frame sees (field of view)
-- **focal.depth** — how far the focus zone stretches through space
-- **focal.distance** — how close or far the focal plane is set
-
----
-
-## tradeoff matrix
-
-| Want to increase…     | Compensate by…                                   |
-|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
-| **focal.acuity** ↑     | decrease depth ↓, step back ↑, narrow breadth ↓ |
-| **focal.breadth** ↑    | reduce acuity ↓, step back ↑, flatten depth ↓   |
-| **focal.depth** ↑      | reduce acuity ↓, step back ↑, compress breadth ↓|
-| **focal.distance** ↓   | reduce depth ↓, increase acuity ↑, narrow breadth ↓ |
-
----
-
-## verbal examples
-
-- want **finer details**? (focal.acuity++)
-- then, either
-  - step back (focal.distance++)
-  - collapse depth (focal.depth--)
-  - crop field of view (focal.breadth--)
-
-- want a **wider scene**? (focal.breadth++)
-- then, either
-  - reduce acuity (focal.acuity--)
-  - step back (focal.distance++)
-  - tolerate shallow depth (focal.depth--)
-
-- want **deeper focus**? (focal.depth++)
-- then, either
-  - reduce acuity (focal.acuity--)
-  - step back (focal.distance++)
-  - narrow scene (focal.breadth--)
-
-- want to get **closer**? (focal.distance--)
-- then, either
-  - reduce depth (focal.depth--)
-  - increase sharpness (focal.acuity++)
-  - narrow scene (focal.breadth--)
-
----
-
-## best practice zone
-
-For full-frame photography:
-
-- Aperture: f/5.6 to f/8
-- Distance: 2–5 meters
-- Focal length: 35mm–85mm (moderate breadth)
-
-This keeps the optical balance manageable:
-
-- **focal.acuity**: avoids diffraction or aberration
-- **focal.breadth**: flexible for framing
-- **focal.depth**: useful for subject layering
-- **focal.distance**: compositional stability

package/dist/logic/roles/bhrain/.briefs/tactician/tactics.compose.traits_and_skills.[article].md

@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
-# 🧩 .brief.article: `tactics as compositions of traits and skills`
-
-## 💡 concept
-**tactics** are not a strict hierarchy but a **composition** of **traits** and **skills**.
-- **traits** = dispositions (orientations of thought, energy, and behavior).
-- **skills** = capabilities (trainable abilities applied in practice).
-a tactic emerges when a specific **combination** of traits and skills is aligned toward an outcome.
-
----
-
-## 🎯 why composition matters
-- traits and skills are **independent**: curiosity and precision can both shape chemistry, but in different ways.
-- tactics are **composable**: the same skill can express differently depending on which trait anchors it.
-- outcomes **shift** when traits or skills are dialed up, down, or swapped.
-
----
-
-## 📚 examples by domain
-
-### 🧪 science
-**curious chemist**
-- **trait**: curiosity
-- **skill**: chemistry analysis
-- **tactic**: exploratory experimentation, testing boundaries, embracing unknowns.
-- **outcome**: discovery of novel reactions, unexpected insights.
-
-**precise chemist**
-- **trait**: precision
-- **skill**: chemistry analysis
-- **tactic**: rigorous measurement, narrow tolerances, strict replication.
-- **outcome**: reliable results, industry-grade reproducibility.
-
----
-
-### 🪚 craft
-**adaptive carpenter**
-- **trait**: creativity
-- **skill**: carpentry
-- **tactic**: improvises with available materials, adapts joinery to context.
-- **outcome**: unique custom pieces, practical fixes in resource-limited settings.
-
-**disciplined carpenter**
-- **trait**: discipline
-- **skill**: carpentry
-- **tactic**: follows measured plans precisely, applies standardized methods.
-- **outcome**: consistent, repeatable, structurally sound products.
-
----
-
-### 🤝 negotiation
-**empathetic negotiator**
-- **trait**: empathy
-- **skill**: negotiation
-- **tactic**: listens deeply, frames deals around shared needs.
-- **outcome**: durable agreements, long-term trust.
-
-**strategic negotiator**
-- **trait**: foresight
-- **skill**: negotiation
-- **tactic**: maps long-term consequences, anticipates concessions and pivots.
-- **outcome**: advantage in complex deals, positioning for future leverage.
-
----
-
-## ⚖️ composability
-- one **skill** can pair with multiple **traits** → different tactics, different outcomes.
-- one **trait** can pair with multiple **skills** → different expressions of the same disposition.
-- **tactics** emerge from the active **pairing**, not from traits or skills alone.
-
----
-
-## 📌 takeaway
-tactics are **compositions**, not hierarchies:
-- **traits** provide orientation.
-- **skills** provide capability.
-- tactics combine them to yield different **outcomes**, which can shift as traits are dialed differently in different contexts.

package/dist/logic/roles/bhrain/.briefs/tactician/trait.articulation.[article].md

@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
-# 🧩 .brief.article: `pattern of trait articulation`
-
-## 💡 concept
-a **trait articulation** describes how a personal or systemic trait manifests across three distinct modes:
-- **boon** = benefit mode, the gift of the trait when expressed well.
-- **bane** = detriment mode, the distortion of the trait when taken too far.
-- **balance** = integrative mode, the steady form that holds the gift without falling into the trap.
-
-this pattern ensures traits are understood not as static labels, but as dynamic forces with both potential and peril.
-
----
-
-## 🎯 purpose
-- create richer portraits of traits than single definitions allow.
-- highlight both the **value** and the **risk** of a trait.
-- emphasize the need for **balance** as the mature expression of any trait.
-- provide a structure that can apply across domains: personality, craft, leadership, learning, etc.
-
----
-
-## 🔍 structure of articulation
-
-### 1. .trait.boon
-- **essence**: what the trait gives when it operates in healthy form.
-- **benefits**: strengths, gifts, and opportunities.
-- **behaviors**: observable actions that express the boon.
-
-### 2. .trait.bane
-- **essence**: what the trait becomes when it overextends.
-- **risks**: distortions, traps, or excesses.
-- **symptoms**: signals that the trait has shifted into bane.
-
-### 3. .trait.balance
-- **essence**: how the trait can be integrated with discernment.
-- **stance**: principles that prevent overreach.
-- **behaviors**: practices that preserve clarity and prevent distortion.
-
----
-
-## 📚 examples
-
-### 1. curiosity
-- **boon**: discovery, insight, growth.
-- **bane**: distraction, endless novelty, shallow wandering.
-- **balance**: guided exploration aligned with purpose.
-
----
-
-### 2. discipline
-- **boon**: consistency, reliability, mastery through practice.
-- **bane**: rigidity, joyless routine, resistance to change.
-- **balance**: disciplined flow that adapts structure to context.
-
----
-
-### 3. empathy
-- **boon**: connection, trust, understanding others’ needs.
-- **bane**: over-identification, blurred boundaries, emotional exhaustion.
-- **balance**: compassionate presence with clear self-boundaries.
-
----
-
-## 📌 takeaway
-the **pattern of trait articulation** reframes traits as **dynamic spectra** rather than fixed qualities.
-every trait has a **boon** that gifts, a **bane** that distorts, and a **balance** that integrates.
-
-this triadic articulation turns traits into **living tools** for reflection, growth, and design.

package/dist/logic/roles/bhrain/.briefs/tactician/trait.purpose.[article].md

@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-# 🧩 .brief.article: `purpose of traits`
-
-## 💡 concept
-**traits** are recurring modes of thought, behavior, or expression that shape how an individual, team, or system engages with the world. they are not fixed states but **patterns of disposition** that influence choices, interactions, and outcomes.
-
----
-
-## 🎯 purposes of traits
-
-### 1. orientation
-traits orient how energy, attention, and action flow.
-- curiosity points attention outward.
-- discipline channels energy inward.
-- empathy directs focus toward others.
-
----
-
-### 2. prediction
-traits allow us to anticipate likely patterns of behavior.
-- a disciplined person can be relied on to complete commitments.
-- an empathetic leader is expected to notice unspoken needs.
-
----
-
-### 3. reflection
-traits act as mirrors for growth. they reveal both:
-- **boon** = the gift we bring when the trait is expressed well.
-- **bane** = the trap we fall into when it overextends.
-- **balance** = the integration that matures the trait.
-
----
-
-### 4. articulation
-traits provide a shared vocabulary for describing tendencies.
-- instead of vague impressions, we can say: *“this person’s empathy is in bane mode.”*
-- traits let us discuss strengths and distortions with precision.
-
----
-
-### 5. design
-traits give structure for intentional cultivation.
-- they can be trained, reinforced, or balanced.
-- teams can be designed to complement each other’s trait profiles.
-- systems can be engineered to amplify boon and dampen bane.
-
----
-
-## 📌 takeaway
-the **purpose of traits** is not to label people, but to **map dispositions**:
-- to orient energy and focus,
-- to predict patterns of behavior,
-- to reflect on growth,
-- to articulate tendencies with precision,
-- and to design individuals and systems toward balanced expression.
-
-in this way, traits function as **living lenses** for understanding and shaping both self and collective.

package/dist/logic/roles/bhrain/.briefs/tactician/trait.vs_skill.[article].md

@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
-# 🧩 .brief.article: `traits vs skills`
-
-## 💡 concept
-**traits** and **skills** both shape how people act, but they operate on different levels:
-- a **trait** is a recurring disposition — a pattern of orientation, energy, or behavior.
-- a **skill** is a learned capability — a pattern of execution that can be trained and measured.
-
-understanding the distinction prevents us from mistaking innate tendencies for trainable abilities.
-
----
-
-## 🔍 differences
-
-### 1. origin
-- **traits**: emerge from personality, temperament, or long-term conditioning. often stable across time.
-- **skills**: emerge from practice and instruction. flexible and trainable.
-
----
-
-### 2. scope
-- **traits**: broad in effect; they color multiple domains.
-  - curiosity can shape art, science, or relationships.
-- **skills**: narrow in application; tied to specific domains.
-  - coding, carpentry, negotiation.
-
----
-
-### 3. changeability
-- **traits**: shift slowly; can be balanced but not easily “installed.”
-- **skills**: shift quickly; can be learned, upgraded, or replaced.
-
----
-
-### 4. evaluation
-- **traits**: assessed by patterns over time.
-  - someone *is disciplined* when reliability shows consistently.
-- **skills**: assessed by performance in tasks.
-  - someone *knows SQL* when they can query databases.
-
----
-
-### 5. relation
-- **traits** set the posture.
-- **skills** execute within that posture.
-
-> example: a disciplined trait supports the steady practice needed to build the piano skill.
-> without discipline, the skill may stall despite talent.
-
----
-
-## 📌 takeaway
-- **traits = disposition**: they orient and color behavior across contexts.
-- **skills = capability**: they enable specific acts within contexts.
-- both interact: traits provide the soil, skills provide the tools.
-together, they form the **architecture of ability** — traits set the stance, skills supply the execution.

package/dist/logic/roles/bhrain/.briefs/tactician/trait.vs_tactic.[article].md

@@ -1,70 +0,0 @@
-# 🧩 .brief.article: `traits as the foundation of tactics`
-
-## 💡 concept
-to **execute a tactic**, one must apply **skills** upon a baseline of **traits**.
-- **traits** = the dispositions that orient attention, energy, and behavior.
-- **skills** = the trainable capabilities that act within that orientation.
-without traits as the foundation, skills may not sustain, and tactics may not succeed.
-
----
-
-## 🎯 why traits are foundational
-
-### 1. skills rest on traits
-a skill is only as stable as the trait beneath it.
-- chemistry requires **precision**.
-- leadership requires **confidence**.
-- negotiation requires **empathy**.
-without the trait, the skill cannot fully embed or function reliably.
-
----
-
-### 2. traits sustain skills under pressure
-skills can be taught in a classroom, but in the field they falter unless traits hold steady.
-- **discipline** keeps practice consistent.
-- **resilience** prevents collapse under failure.
-- **curiosity** fuels the drive to refine.
-
----
-
-### 3. traits shape the style of skill
-two people may wield the same skill differently depending on traits.
-- a communicator with **empathy** persuades through trust.
-- a communicator with **charisma** persuades through presence.
-- a communicator without anchoring traits risks manipulation or emptiness.
-
----
-
-### 4. traits prevent mechanical execution
-a tactic applied by skill alone feels forced, brittle, or artificial.
-- traits give **natural posture**.
-- skills give **effective action**.
-- tactics require both.
-
----
-
-## 📚 examples
-
-- **skill**: chemistry analysis
-  - **trait baseline**: precision, patience
-  - **tactic enabled**: rigorous experiment without error creep.
-
-- **skill**: carpentry
-  - **trait baseline**: steadiness, attention to detail
-  - **tactic enabled**: joints fit cleanly, structures hold.
-
-- **skill**: coding
-  - **trait baseline**: logic, persistence
-  - **tactic enabled**: debugging without giving up too soon.
-
----
-
-## 📌 takeaway
-to execute a tactic:
-1. **trait** sets the baseline posture.
-2. **skill** provides the capability.
-3. **tactic** applies skill through the trait into real outcomes.
-
-> skills without traits collapse under pressure.
-> tactics without traits turn mechanical.
-> traits are the **foundation** that make both durable and alive.

package/dist/logic/roles/bhrain/.briefs/terms.motive.intent.goal.md

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-🔥 [motive] — an internal pressure or desire
-.what = the underlying reason the actor wants anything at all
-
-.form = emotional, value-driven, often implicit
-
-.examples:
-[motive] = avoid failure
-[motive] = gain respect
-[motive] = feel in control
-
----
-
-🎯 [intent] — a chosen next action
-.what = a specific thing the actor plans to do next
-
-.form = short-term, actionable, verb-shaped
-
-.examples:
-[intent] = schedule a call
-[intent] = submit proposal
-[intent] = clean the garage
-
----
-
-🥅 [goal] — a desired future state
-.what = a future outcome the actor wants to reach
-
-.form = long-term, state-shaped, noun/condition
-
-.examples:
-[goal] = get more customers
-[goal] = have a clean house
-[goal] = win the bid
-
----
-
-🧠 mental model
-[motive] = source of pressure
-[goal] = destination
-[intent] = chosen step toward it
-
-- `[motive]` fuels the journey
-- `[goal]` gives it direction
-- `[intent]` initiates motion
-
-> every `[intent]` serves a `[goal]`, and every `[goal]` is backed by a `[motive]` — but these are not always visible on the surface.

package/dist/logic/roles/bhrain/.briefs/thinker.tactics/<cluster>._.[article].frame.tactical._.md

@@ -1,85 +0,0 @@
-# 🧩 .brief: `thought process of <cluster>`
-
-## .what
-
-The `<cluster>` operation involves grouping related concepts, ideas, or data points into cohesive units based on shared characteristics or themes. This process leverages pattern recognition and categorization principles to enhance understanding, comparison, and analysis.
-
----
-
-## 🎯 purpose
-
-- to identify and form meaningful groups from disparate elements
-- to facilitate deeper insights through pattern recognition
-- to simplify complex information by breaking it into manageable parts
-
----
-
-## ⚙️ method
-
-1. **identify elements**
-   - gather concepts, ideas, or data points that need clustering
-   - ensure a diverse and representative sample
-
-2. **determine criteria**
-   - establish the basis for clustering (e.g., shared attributes, function, purpose)
-   - criteria should be clear and consistent across all elements
-
-3. **analyze and group**
-   - assess each element against the criteria
-   - form clusters based on the most significant matches or relationships
-
-4. **review and refine**
-   - evaluate clusters for clarity, coherence, and relevance
-   - adjust groupings as necessary for optimal structure
-
----
-
-## 🧠 cognitive basis
-
-Clustering relies on the brain's natural ability to recognize patterns and associations. It mimics cognitive processes involved in categorization, memory retrieval, and decision-making, thereby streamlining information processing and comprehension.
-
----
-
-## 📐 when to use
-
-- when dealing with large volumes of information that need organization
-- when exploring relationships between concepts for strategic insight or analysis
-- when preparing data for presentation, highlighting key themes or trends
-
----
-
-## 🔁 dynamic behavior
-
-Clustering is often iterative, with repeated cycles of grouping, reviewing, and refining. This helps to accommodate new information or evolving understanding, ensuring clusters remain relevant and actionable.
-
----
-
-## ⚠️ caution: over-clustering
-
-Avoid creating too many clusters or overly complex structures, which can obscure rather than clarify. Clusters should strike a balance between granularity and cohesion.
-
----
-
-## 🧰 use it for:
-
-- data analysis and research
-- strategic planning and brainstorming
-- knowledge management and taxonomy development
-
----
-
-## 📊 examples
-
-1. **Market Segmentation**
-   - Grouping customers based on demographic, geographic, or behavioral characteristics to tailor marketing strategies.
-
-2. **Academic Research**
-   - Clustering academic papers or references by themes or topics to identify research gaps or emerging trends.
-
-3. **Product Categorization**
-   - Organizing products into categories like electronics, clothing, and home appliances to enhance user navigation in online stores.
-
-4. **Strategic Brainstorming**
-   - Grouping ideas from brainstorming sessions into actionable categories such as short-term tactics, long-term strategies, and innovative solutions.
-
----

package/dist/logic/roles/bhrain/.briefs/thinker.tactics/<cluster>.vs_<diverge>.duality.[article].md

@@ -1,43 +0,0 @@
-# 🧩 .brief: `<diverge> ↔ <cluster>`
-
-## .what
-the **duality** between `<diverge>` and `<cluster>` describes a **complementary motion of thought**:
-- `<diverge>` expands a concept outward into **maximum variance instances**
-- `<cluster>` contracts many instances inward into **coherent groupings**
-
-together they form a **push–pull dynamic** of exploration and organization.
-
----
-
-## 🎯 purpose
-- balance **creativity and clarity**: generate wide variety, then refine into structure
-- ensure **coverage and coherence**: divergence prevents blind spots, clustering prevents overload
-- support **iterative cycles of insight**: each informs and strengthens the other
-
----
-
-## ⚙️ motion
-1. **<diverge>**
-   - spread focus to surface **differences, alternatives, and variations**
-   - motion is centrifugal — outward, increasing breadth
-
-2. **<cluster>**
-   - compress focus to reveal **patterns, affinities, and themes**
-   - motion is centripetal — inward, increasing coherence
-
----
-
-## 🔄 interplay
-- divergence without clustering → noise, endless fragments, lack of synthesis
-- clustering without divergence → rigidity, premature convergence, missed options
-- **dual-cycle**:
-  1. diverge to gather possibilities
-  2. cluster to extract structure
-  3. repeat as needed, each cycle sharper
-
----
-
-## 📐 metaphor
-- `<diverge>` = scattering seeds across a field
-- `<cluster>` = harvesting them into sheaves
-- the **crop of thought** emerges only through both motions in rhythm

package/dist/logic/roles/bhrain/.briefs/thinker.tactics/<diverge>._.[article].frame.cognitive.[seed].md

@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
-<diverge> is an extreme example of <vary>
-
-see cognition briefs for reference
-