rhachet-roles-bhuild 0.14.4 → 0.14.6

package/dist/domain.operations/behavior/init/templates/3.3.1.blueprint.product.v1.guard.heavy

@@ -11,6 +11,19 @@ reviews:
       say: |
         try hard to delete before you optimize:
 
+        ## features
+
+        for each feature in the blueprint, ask:
+        - does this feature trace to a requirement in the criteria?
+        - did the wisher explicitly ask for this feature?
+        - or did we assume it was needed?
+
+        if a feature has no traceability to vision or criteria:
+        1. delete it
+        2. or flag it as an open question for the wisher
+
+        ## components
+
         for each component, ask:
         - can this be removed entirely?
         - if we deleted this and had to add it back, would we?
@@ -234,7 +247,7 @@ reviews:
         fix all gaps before you continue.
 
   peer:
-    - bash -c ". .agent/repo=.this/role=any/skills/use.apikeys.sh && npx rhachet run --repo bhrain --skill review --rules '.agent/repo=ehmpathy/role=mechanic/briefs/practices/code.prod/pitofsuccess.errors/rule.*.md' --diffs since-main --paths-with '$route/3.3.blueprint.*.md' --join intersect --output '$route/.reviews/$stone.peer-review.failhides.md' --mode hard 2>&1"
+    - npx rhachet run --repo bhrain --skill review --rules '.agent/repo=ehmpathy/role=mechanic/briefs/practices/code.prod/pitofsuccess.errors/rule.*.md' --diffs since-main --paths-with '$route/3.3.blueprint.*.md' --join intersect --output '$route/.reviews/$stone.peer-review.failhides.md' --mode hard
 
 judges:
   - npx rhachet run --repo bhrain --skill route.stone.judge --mechanism reviewed? --stone $stone --route $route --allow-blockers 0 --allow-nitpicks 3

package/dist/domain.operations/behavior/init/templates/3.3.1.blueprint.product.v1.guard.light

@@ -11,6 +11,19 @@ reviews:
       say: |
         try hard to delete before you optimize:
 
+        ## features
+
+        for each feature in the blueprint, ask:
+        - does this feature trace to a requirement in the criteria?
+        - did the wisher explicitly ask for this feature?
+        - or did we assume it was needed?
+
+        if a feature has no traceability to vision or criteria:
+        1. delete it
+        2. or flag it as an open question for the wisher
+
+        ## components
+
         for each component, ask:
         - can this be removed entirely?
         - if we deleted this and had to add it back, would we?
@@ -182,7 +195,7 @@ reviews:
         fix all gaps before you continue.
 
   peer:
-    - bash -c ". .agent/repo=.this/role=any/skills/use.apikeys.sh && npx rhachet run --repo bhrain --skill review --rules '.agent/repo=ehmpathy/role=mechanic/briefs/practices/code.prod/pitofsuccess.errors/rule.*.md' --diffs since-main --paths-with '$route/3.3.blueprint.*.md' --join intersect --output '$route/.reviews/$stone.peer-review.failhides.md' --mode hard 2>&1"
+    - npx rhachet run --repo bhrain --skill review --rules '.agent/repo=ehmpathy/role=mechanic/briefs/practices/code.prod/pitofsuccess.errors/rule.*.md' --diffs since-main --paths-with '$route/3.3.blueprint.*.md' --join intersect --output '$route/.reviews/$stone.peer-review.failhides.md' --mode hard
 
 judges:
   - npx rhachet run --repo bhrain --skill route.stone.judge --mechanism reviewed? --stone $stone --route $route --allow-blockers 0 --allow-nitpicks 3

package/dist/domain.operations/behavior/init/templates/5.1.execution.phase0_to_phaseN.v1.guard

@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 # guard for execution stone
 # includes standardized self-review frame
 
+artifacts:
+  # track execution progress
+  - "$route/5.1.execution.phase0_to_phaseN.v1.i1.md"
+  # track actual implementation in src/
+  - "src/**/*"
+
 reviews:
   self:
     # 1. minimalism - yagni
@@ -151,7 +157,7 @@ reviews:
         fix all gaps before you continue.
 
   peer:
-    - bash -c ". .agent/repo=.this/role=any/skills/use.apikeys.sh && npx rhachet run --repo bhrain --skill review --rules '.agent/repo=ehmpathy/role=mechanic/briefs/practices/code.prod/pitofsuccess.errors/rule.*.md' --diffs since-main --paths-with 'src/**/*.ts' --join intersect --output '$route/.reviews/$stone.peer-review.failhides.md' --mode hard 2>&1"
+    - npx rhachet run --repo bhrain --skill review --rules '.agent/repo=ehmpathy/role=mechanic/briefs/practices/code.prod/pitofsuccess.errors/rule.*.md' --diffs since-main --paths-with 'src/**/*.ts' --join intersect --output '$route/.reviews/$stone.peer-review.failhides.md' --mode hard
 
 judges:
   - npx rhachet run --repo bhrain --skill route.stone.judge --mechanism reviewed? --stone $stone --route $route --allow-blockers 0 --allow-nitpicks 3

package/dist/domain.operations/behavior/init/templates/5.2.evaluation.v1.stone

@@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ evaluate what was implemented against the blueprint
 .what = articulate exactly what was implemented, then check for divergences from blueprint.
 
 .why = the blueprint declared what the execution would adhere to.
-- divergences may be intentional improvements or accidental drift
-- each divergence must be either repaired or backed up with rationale
+- divergences are NOT allowed
+- default action is REPAIR — fix implementation to match blueprint
+- if repair is impossible, raise BLOCKER and request human approval
 - this gate prevents silent deviations from approved design
 
 ---
@@ -68,20 +69,21 @@ for each section (summary, filediff, codepath, test coverage), compare:
 
 ### divergence resolution
 
-for each divergence, you must either:
+for each divergence:
 
-**repair** — fix the implementation to match the blueprint:
+**repair** (default) — fix the implementation to match the blueprint:
 - what needs to change to match blueprint?
 - make the change, then update the "as implemented" section above
 
-**backup** — document why the divergence is acceptable:
-- why did the implementation diverge?
-- why is the divergence better than the blueprint?
-- should the blueprint be updated for future reference?
+**blocker** (only if repair is impossible) — request human approval:
+- why is repair impossible?
+- what constraint prevents adherence to blueprint?
+- run `rhx route.stone.set --as blocked` to declare yourself blocked and request human approval
+- STOP and await human decision before you proceed
 
 | divergence | resolution | rationale |
 |------------|------------|-----------|
-| ... | repair/backup | ... |
+| ... | repair/blocker | ... |
 
 ---
 

package/dist/domain.operations/behavior/init/templates/5.3.verification.v1.guard

@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+artifacts:
+  # track verification progress
+  - "$route/5.3.verification.v1.i1.md"
+  # track actual implementation in src/
+  - "src/**/*"
+
 reviews:
   self:
     - slug: has-behavior-coverage

package/dist/domain.operations/behavior/init/templates/5.5.playtest.v1.guard

@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+artifacts:
+  # track playtest progress
+  - "$route/5.5.playtest.v1.i1.md"
+  # track actual implementation in src/
+  - "src/**/*"
+
 reviews:
   self:
     - slug: has-clear-instructions

package/package.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "name": "rhachet-roles-bhuild",
   "author": "ehmpathy",
   "description": "roles for building resilient systems, via rhachet",
-  "version": "0.14.4",
+  "version": "0.14.6",
   "repository": "ehmpathy/rhachet-roles-bhuild",
   "homepage": "https://github.com/ehmpathy/rhachet-roles-bhuild",
   "keywords": [
@@ -89,11 +89,11 @@
     "esbuild-register": "3.6.0",
     "husky": "8.0.3",
     "jest": "30.2.0",
-    "rhachet": "1.37.17",
+    "rhachet": "1.38.1",
     "rhachet-brains-anthropic": "0.4.0",
-    "rhachet-roles-bhrain": "0.20.2",
+    "rhachet-roles-bhrain": "0.23.9",
     "rhachet-roles-bhuild": "link:.",
-    "rhachet-roles-ehmpathy": "1.29.1",
+    "rhachet-roles-ehmpathy": "1.34.9",
     "tsc-alias": "1.8.10",
     "tsx": "4.20.6",
     "typescript": "5.4.5",