replen 1.0.23 → 1.0.25
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
|
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ export function discoverProjects(roots) {
|
|
|
171
171
|
seenGithub.add(githubFullName);
|
|
172
172
|
// Slug + display name both anchor on the GitHub repo NAME, not the
|
|
173
173
|
// local folder name. Deriving from the folder meant a folder rename (or
|
|
174
|
-
// an org rename
|
|
174
|
+
// an org rename) minted a fresh slug and the server
|
|
175
175
|
// inserted a duplicate row. `~/code/drone` with remote
|
|
176
176
|
// `nsokin/palisade-website` now registers as slug `palisade-website`.
|
|
177
177
|
// The repo name is also the fallback display name, so a generic
|
|
@@ -353,7 +353,13 @@ verdict it calibrates the relevance floor for this project, and your
|
|
|
353
353
|
adopt/skip pattern continuously tunes the ranking via the taste vector).
|
|
354
354
|
A skip coded `modality-collision` teaches Replen that this repo fits a
|
|
355
355
|
*different* modality — so it stays available for the right project but stops
|
|
356
|
-
colliding with this one.
|
|
356
|
+
colliding with this one. A skip coded `covered` is the strongest signal you
|
|
357
|
+
can send: it tells Replen the capability is **already built in this repo**, so
|
|
358
|
+
it stops probing that facet entirely and won't surface a different tool for it
|
|
359
|
+
next session. Use `covered` ONLY when you've confirmed the implementation in
|
|
360
|
+
the code (e.g. the repo has its own `services/llm_client.py`), not just because
|
|
361
|
+
a similar dependency exists — that's what makes "we already do this" stick to
|
|
362
|
+
the capability instead of replaying every session against a new candidate.
|
|
357
363
|
|
|
358
364
|
**Candidate's README is unreachable (WebFetch 404)**. Note it in the
|
|
359
365
|
writeup (`Caveats: README unreachable; verdict based on description
|
|
@@ -126,13 +126,27 @@ knowledge graph — verify instead.)
|
|
|
126
126
|
### 2c. Write the grounded project report
|
|
127
127
|
|
|
128
128
|
Produce a comprehensive write-up of the repo — the thing you'd hand a new
|
|
129
|
-
engineer. Cover: **
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
|
|
135
|
-
|
|
129
|
+
engineer. Cover: **the stack · the algorithms/techniques it uses and WHY · the
|
|
130
|
+
data it operates on (shape/modality) · how it's architected · the technical
|
|
131
|
+
problem it solves · constraints/non-goals.** Ground every claim in the code
|
|
132
|
+
(name the files/modules). Be specific about the tech, not the domain. This
|
|
133
|
+
report is the single richest grounding artifact — it's what lets Replen tell,
|
|
134
|
+
e.g., "anomaly detection over telemetry time-series (no ML)" apart from
|
|
135
|
+
"image-defect anomaly detection".
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
**Respect the cover — describe the TECH, never de-sanitize the application.**
|
|
138
|
+
This report leaves the machine (stored server-side as grounding), so it must
|
|
139
|
+
read like the repo's own public docs, not like a leak. Replen only needs the
|
|
140
|
+
technical capability profile — what algorithms run on what data shape — which is
|
|
141
|
+
modality-precise without any sensitive real-world detail. If the README/CLAUDE.md
|
|
142
|
+
deliberately present a sanitized framing (e.g. "urban-infrastructure
|
|
143
|
+
segmentation") that differs from what the code's identifiers imply, FOLLOW THE
|
|
144
|
+
DOCS' framing: write "semantic segmentation of overhead imagery into vector
|
|
145
|
+
polygons," NOT the specific real-world thing it detects or who uses it. Never
|
|
146
|
+
copy a sensitive internal codename, end-user, deployment, or real-world target
|
|
147
|
+
into the report or the descriptors — the capability is the signal; the
|
|
148
|
+
application is exactly what stays local. When in doubt, describe it as the
|
|
149
|
+
public README does.
|
|
136
150
|
|
|
137
151
|
### 2d. Derive grounded capabilities
|
|
138
152
|
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "replen",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "1.0.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "1.0.25",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Make your AI coding tools smarter. One command, no API keys, free. Replen watches what your projects actually do and surfaces a few things worth bringing in each month. Use one as is, port a piece of another, cherry pick an idea, or build it clean room. The match happens inside your AI tool's session. A few actionable matches a month, by design.",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"bin": {
|