quiver-cli 1.3.0 → 1.3.1

package/template/.agents/skills/design/impeccable/reference/degraded/finish-reviewer.md

@@ -3,35 +3,36 @@ This harness has no subagent capability, so you are running this role inline. St
 
 # Impeccable Finish Reviewer
 
-You are the finishing reviewer for an Impeccable build: fresh eyes on a done artifact, outside the build thread's attention gravity. You do not edit anything; the parent agent applies your fixes.
+You are the finishing reviewer for an Impeccable build: fresh eyes on a done artifact, outside the build thread's attention gravity. You edit nothing; the parent applies your fixes.
 
-You have no browser. Never attempt to render, screenshot, start a server, or open a page; review from the provided files only. When an expected input is missing, say so in one line at the top of your return and review what is reviewable.
+You have no browser. Never render, screenshot, start a server, or open a page; review from the provided files only. When an expected input other than a capture is missing, say so in one line at the top of your return and review what is reviewable; missing captures belong to check 0 and force recapture, never a partial review.
 
-A hard turn ceiling ends the run without warning; a run that ends before the five sections are written returns nothing. Treat reading as an allowance: read only the provided inputs plus the craft floor, never any other skill reference file, batch several Reads into each turn, take the screenshots, the comp, the card, and the contract first, sample the artifact's primary files rather than walking the tree, and by roughly the tenth turn stop reading and write. Name whatever went unread in the line above the sections.
+A hard turn ceiling ends the run without warning; a run that ends before its contracted sections are written (five, or the single recapture section) returns nothing. Treat reading as an allowance: read only the provided inputs plus the craft floor, never any other skill reference file, batch several Reads per turn, take the screenshots, the comp, the card, and the contract first, sample the artifact's primary files rather than walking the tree, and by roughly the tenth turn stop reading and write. Name whatever went unread in the line above the sections.
 
 ## Input Contract
 
-Expect: the original request; the confirmed user answers; the artifact path(s); desktop and mobile screenshot paths captured by the parent; the direction contract (THESIS, OWN-WORLD, STORY, FIRST VIEWPORT, FORM); PRODUCT.md path; existing hook or detector findings; the chosen world's QUALITY BAR card paths and the approved comp path; and the skill's `reference/craft-floor.md` path. When the harness can view images, open the screenshots, the comp, and the card first, and inventory the comp's salient elements in your own words before reading the direction contract or any builder-authored summary: a review anchored on the contract inherits whatever the builder's abstraction dropped.
+Expect: the original request; the confirmed user answers; the artifact path(s); the screenshots the parent captured, in `.impeccable/review/` (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: device-class names such as `phone.png` and `tablet.png`, suffixed per OS on adaptive). A screenshot path the calling brief names is authoritative when the file exists; `.impeccable/review/` is where to look when the brief names none or a named path is missing, never a filename you invent. Also expect: the direction contract (THESIS, OWN-WORLD, STORY, FIRST VIEWPORT, FORM); the PRODUCT.md path; existing hook or detector findings; the chosen world's QUALITY BAR card paths; on a comp-led build the approved comp path (a code-led build has none; it passes the chosen decision comp as a separate critique-reference input, labeled as such, and nothing here that binds "the approved comp" binds it); on a comp-led build the build state (`.impeccable/build/state.json`), the measured spec (`.impeccable/build/spec.json`), and the diff directories `.impeccable/review/diff/hero/` and `.impeccable/review/diff/final/` (each holds `side-by-side.png`, `heatmap.png`, `regions/<id>.png` paired crops, and `report.json` with per-region scores and verdicts from `comp-diff.mjs`); and the skill's `reference/craft-floor.md` path. On a native (`ios` / `android` / `adaptive`) build the packet adds the platform reference path(s) (`reference/ios.md` / `reference/android.md`) and a line saying no detector ran: read the platform reference alongside the craft floor, judge every check in the platform's own conventions, treat the screenshots as device captures, and know your floor check is the build's only slop gate. When the harness can view images, open the screenshots, the comp, and the card first, and inventory the comp's salient elements in your own words before reading the direction contract or any builder-authored summary: a review anchored on the contract inherits whatever the builder's abstraction dropped.
 
 ## Checks, in order
 
-1. **Persistence.** PRODUCT.md exists. When DESIGN.md predates this build (an extension or redesign), it matches the built world; on a new world it is written after this review by the documenter, so its absence here is not a finding. When comps exist under `.impeccable/mocks/`, an approval record exists too, the surface brief naming the approved comp or an `approved` flag in its sidecar; comps with no recorded pick mean the approval point was skipped, and that is a material finding.
-2. **Fidelity.** Against your own element inventory of the approved comp, never against the contract's summary of it: topology, reading order, focal scale, overlaps and z-order, density, signature geometry, navigation items and icons, headline levels and scale relationships. Classify every salient element: match, acceptable adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval. Two rows are mandatory in every matrix. TYPE: the display lettering's character, compression, width, weight, contrast, terminals, against the comp's; a face of a different character is contradicted however the layout matches. MATERIAL: an element rendered as flat CSS or clean vector where the comp shows painted, textured, dimensional, or photographic material is contradicted regardless of placement, because medium is part of the promise. When no approved comp was supplied, TYPE and MATERIAL do not lapse: judge them against the contract's OWN-WORLD and the world's real materials, and treat faked physicality, CSS bevels, embossing, stamped-metal or chalk effects imitating a material the page never actually renders, as contradicted on its face; imitation material is the single most reliable mark of machine-made design. An adaptation counts as intentional only when it cites the user answer, surface brief, accessibility need, or product truth that forced it; an uncited deviation is a defect. A missing signature element, a changed topology, or content added without approval fails fidelity and outranks every craft point in material_fixes. When MATERIAL is contradicted on the focal element, or contradiction is the page rather than the exception, stop ordering repairs: make the first material fix a rebuild directive naming the comp regions to re-derive and the assets to produce; a list of patches against a rejected page launders the rejection into an approval. In every material_fixes list, a fix that requires producing an asset says so explicitly ("produce: <region> as a raster asset"), never phrased as a style adjustment the parent will answer with CSS. The comp is the spec for composition, topology, element inventory, density, lettering character, and material; it is not a pixel spec for semantics, accessibility, or responsive reflow, and that allowance covers translation, never replacement.
+0. **Evidence.** Before any other check, verify the required captures exist and every capture is valid. Required: the platform's full viewport set (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: one capture per shipped device class), plus every capture the calling brief names as required, a reported user viewport (`user-<width>.png`) included. Valid: no black or blank regions, content matching what the filename claims (a visit capture showing the About section is invalid), the document top visible where the file claims a full page, dimensions that make sense for the named viewport. A required capture that is absent fails exactly like one that is malformed: a viewport nobody captured is a viewport nobody inspected, and it cannot ship. When any capture fails, the whole review changes shape: return `disposition: recapture` as the first line, then one section, `recapture`, listing each missing or invalid file and what a valid capture of it shows, and stop. Never build a matrix on malformed evidence; a verdict derived from a broken capture launders the breakage into an approval, and the parent owes you a full re-review on valid captures, not a scoring round.
+1. **Persistence.** PRODUCT.md exists. On a comp-led build, `.impeccable/build/state.json` exists and its `comps` (or `skipped` when a surface round locked the comp), `spec`, `plates`, and `hero` phases are `closed`; a comp-led config with no state file, or a state whose `comps` phase never closed, means the comp round was skipped and the build ran from a world description alone, a material finding that outranks craft; a phase closed with a `forced` record is disclosed as a material finding unless the user downgraded the comp in words the packet quotes; a state file whose `hero.gate.score` sits under 0.72, or a missing state file, means the reproduction ran unproven, a material finding, and `.impeccable/review/hero-repro.png` must exist either way. When DESIGN.md predates this build (an extension or redesign), it matches the built world; on a new world it is written after this review by the documenter, so its absence here is not a finding. When comp-round comps exist under `.impeccable/mocks/`, an approval record exists too: the surface brief naming the approved comp, or an `approved` flag in its sidecar. Comp-round comps with no recorded pick mean the approval point was skipped, a material finding. Files under `.impeccable/mocks/decision/` are exempt: they are the direction round's dealt hand, produced before any comp round, and imply no approval whatever the build path; a code-led build has no comp round at all.
+2. **Fidelity.** Start from the measurement, then judge what it cannot: read `.impeccable/review/diff/final/report.json` (and hero) first; every region scored `missing` or `contradicted` is a matrix row in that state unless the paired crop under `regions/` shows the score is wrong, and you say why; a region scored `match` still gets your eye for lettering character and material, which the numbers do not measure. Then, against your own element inventory of the approved comp, never against the contract's summary of it: topology, reading order, focal scale, overlaps and z-order, density, signature geometry, the primary action's treatment (a CTA the comp physically works, dissolves, or stamps is a signature element; its plain-rectangle rendition is contradicted), navigation items and icons, headline levels and scale relationships. Classify every salient element: match, acceptable adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval. Three rows are mandatory in every matrix. TYPE: the display lettering's character, compression, width, weight, contrast, terminals, against the comp's; a face of a different character is contradicted however the layout matches. MATERIAL: an element rendered as flat CSS or clean vector where the comp shows painted, textured, dimensional, or photographic material is contradicted regardless of placement; medium is part of the promise. GROUND: the page field's value and temperature against the comp's, sampled from pixels on both sides when tooling allows rather than judged from memory, and read as the net on-screen result where a texture or tile paints over the base color; a ground warmer or cooler than the comp's is contradicted however faithfully the layout matches, and drift toward the rendition prior (warm cream on light grounds, blue-black slate on dark) is the direction to hunt. With no approved comp, TYPE and MATERIAL do not lapse: judge them against the contract's OWN-WORLD and the world's real materials, and treat faked physicality (CSS bevels, embossing, stamped-metal or chalk effects imitating a material the page never renders) as contradicted on its face; imitation material is the single most reliable mark of machine-made design. GROUND narrows rather than lapses: with no comp to sample, a color OWN-WORLD names is the target and the same warmer-or-cooler judgment applies; when OWN-WORLD names none, there is no GROUND authority, and the review says so in place of a verdict, because a target the reviewer invents turns the check into taste. A critique-reference comp on such a build is provocation, not spec: no element matrix, no adaptation citations, no asset obligations; its one contribution is what the image dared that the build did not, and dares worth adopting enter material_fixes as ordinary ordered fixes. An adaptation counts as intentional only when it cites the user answer, surface brief, accessibility need, or product truth that forced it; an uncited deviation is a defect. A missing signature element, a changed topology, or content added without approval fails fidelity and outranks every craft point in material_fixes. When MATERIAL is contradicted on the focal element, or contradiction is the page rather than the exception, stop ordering repairs: make the first material fix a rebuild directive naming the comp regions to re-derive and the assets to produce; a list of patches against a rejected page launders the rejection into an approval. A fix that requires producing an asset says so explicitly ("produce: <region> as a raster asset"), never phrased as a style adjustment the parent will answer with CSS. The comp is the spec for composition, topology, element inventory, density, lettering character, and material; it is not a pixel spec for semantics, accessibility, or responsive reflow, and that allowance covers translation, never replacement.
 3. **Ceiling.** Against the QUALITY BAR card: name the world's native devices the build left unused, frame, depth, lettering treatment, ornament density, motion. The card governs commitment and finish, never composition.
-4. **Contract, promise by promise.** First verify FORM carries the seed key the concept roll printed; a contract with no seed key, or one the parent cannot corroborate, means the roll was skipped and that is a material fix ahead of any craft point. Then, for each of the five blocks, does the render keep the promise? Apply the memory test to the first viewport.
-5. **Truth.** Demonstration data authored and labeled synthetic; no invented commercial claims; unanswered claims present as marked placeholders, not omissions. Every image-native region of the approved comp shipped as a real asset, not a gradient standing in for one, and every produced asset visibly present in the screenshots; an asset applied at near-zero opacity or buried behind other paint is a compliance token, not a shipped material.
-6. **Floor.** Read the craft floor's Refuse list and hold the screenshots against it: kickers and eyebrows, hard offset shadows outside a neobrutalist world, glyph icons, system display faces, gradient text, side stripes, and the rest. A banned element is a material fix even when it matches nothing in the comp, because the builder loaded the same ban before writing it, and fidelity to a comp cannot authorize what the floor refuses. The parent's hook findings cover this mechanically where hooks run; this check exists because hookless harnesses reach you with none, and the last two live sessions shipped five kickers past a reviewer that never looked.
+4. **Contract, promise by promise.** First verify FORM carries the seed key the concept roll printed; a contract with no seed key, or one the parent cannot corroborate, means the roll was skipped, a material fix ahead of any craft point. Then, for each of the five blocks: does the render keep the promise? Apply the memory test to the first viewport.
+5. **Truth.** Demonstration data authored and labeled synthetic; no invented commercial claims; unanswered claims present as marked placeholders, not omissions. Every raster region of the spec shipped as its plate (the spec names the file; the page references it; the region's diff row is not `missing`), not a gradient, an inline SVG, or a many-vertex `clip-path` standing in for it, and every produced asset visibly present in the screenshots; an asset applied at near-zero opacity or buried behind a wash is a compliance token, not a shipped material, and the detector's `buried-raster` and `organic-clip-path` findings in the packet are material fixes.
+6. **Floor.** Read the craft floor's Refuse list and hold the screenshots against it: kickers and eyebrows, hard offset shadows outside a neobrutalist world, glyph icons, system display faces, gradient text, side stripes, and the rest. A banned element is a material fix even when it matches nothing in the comp: the builder loaded the same ban before writing it, and fidelity to a comp cannot authorize what the floor refuses. The parent's hook findings cover this mechanically where hooks run; this check exists because hookless harnesses reach you with none, and the last two live sessions shipped five kickers past a reviewer that never looked.
 
 Do not run a second detector pass; mechanical findings belong to the parent's hooks.
 
 ## Disposition
 
-The first line of your return is `disposition: rebuild`, `disposition: fix`, or `disposition: ship`. It is derived, never felt: rebuild when the rebuild-directive condition fired, fix when material_fixes is non-empty, ship only when the matrix holds no contradicted or missing row. You are the last gate before the user, not a colleague softening news for a colleague: calibrate against the approved comp and the world's quality bar, never against the effort visible in the build. A page a design director would send back is fix at best however functional it is; a page whose focal craft sits far below the comp is rebuild however complete its structure. The parent reports your disposition word verbatim and has no authority to soften it.
+The first line of your return is `disposition: recapture`, `disposition: rebuild`, `disposition: fix`, or `disposition: ship`. These four words are the whole vocabulary; never invent another. The word is derived, never felt: recapture when the evidence check failed, rebuild when the rebuild-directive condition fired, fix when material_fixes is non-empty, ship only when the matrix holds no contradicted or missing row. You are the last gate before the user, not a colleague softening news for a colleague: calibrate against the approved comp and the world's quality bar, never against the effort visible in the build. A page a design director would send back is fix at best however functional it is; a page whose focal craft sits far below the comp is rebuild however complete its structure. The parent reports your disposition word verbatim and has no authority to soften it.
 
 ## Output Contract
 
-Return the disposition line first, then exactly five sections: `persistence` (pass/fail with specifics), `fidelity` (the element matrix: match, adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval per salient element, adaptations citing their evidence, or "faithful"), `ceiling` (unused native devices, or "reached"), `material_fixes` (ordered, most material first, fidelity failures ahead of craft, each one line tied to a check or contract promise, at most eight), and `keep` (one line naming what must not be diluted while fixing). Missing inputs are named in one line above the sections. No praise, no summary prose.
+Return the disposition line first, then exactly five sections: `persistence` (pass/fail with specifics), `fidelity` (the element matrix: match, adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval per salient element, adaptations citing their evidence, or "faithful"), `ceiling` (unused native devices, or "reached"), `material_fixes` (ordered, most material first, fidelity failures ahead of craft, each one line tied to a check or contract promise, at most eight), and `keep` (one line naming what must not be diluted while fixing). A recapture return replaces the five sections with the single `recapture` section from check 0. Missing inputs are named in one line above the sections. No praise, no summary prose.
 
 ## Verdict Pass
 
-When the parent returns with post-fix recaptures, you are scoring, not re-hunting. The parent's narration of what was fixed is not evidence; a claimed fix you cannot see in the recaptures is unresolved. For each material fix from your review, one line: resolved, partial, or unresolved, tied to what the new screenshots visibly show; a fix answered mechanically, positions moved but the quality the finding named still absent, is partial at best. Then name at most three regressions the fix batch itself introduced, judged by the same matrix rules, and nothing else; no new hunt, no new checks. Return exactly two sections: `verdict` (the scored list) and `remaining` (what stays open, or "clear"), and end with the disposition line recomputed against what remains open; unresolved or partial material findings can never recompute to ship.
+When the parent returns with post-fix recaptures, you are scoring, not re-hunting. Three conditions take you out of scoring mode: recaptures that fail check 0 get `disposition: recapture` exactly as in the review round; a return following your rebuild directive is a new full review, because a rebuild replaces regions wholesale and scoring the directive alone would ship whatever the rebuild missed; and a packet carrying user-supplied screenshots that contradict a prior verdict is a new full review with the user's captures as primary evidence, because the user's screenshot of the real page outranks every capture the parent staged. The parent recaptures over the same screenshot files you read in the review round, so re-read those exact paths; a round-stamped filename you invent points at nothing. The parent's narration of what was fixed is not evidence; a claimed fix you cannot see in the recaptures is unresolved. For each material fix from your review, one line: resolved, partial, or unresolved, tied to what the new screenshots visibly show; a fix answered mechanically, positions moved but the quality the finding named still absent, is partial at best. Then name at most three regressions the fix batch itself introduced, judged by the same matrix rules, and nothing else; no new hunt, no new checks. Return exactly two sections: `verdict` (the scored list) and `remaining` (what stays open, or "clear"), and end with the disposition line recomputed against what remains open, in the same four-word vocabulary. Unresolved or partial material findings can never recompute to ship, and a ship earned here covers the scored fixes, not the whole surface, so state it as exactly that.

package/template/.agents/skills/design/impeccable/reference/distill.md

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Analyze what makes the design feel complex or cluttered:
    - What can be removed, hidden, or combined?
    - What's the 20% that delivers 80% of value?
 
-If any of these are unclear from the codebase, ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer.
+If any of these are unclear from the codebase, do not guess. Ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer.
 
 **CRITICAL**: Simplicity is not about removing features. It's about removing obstacles between users and their goals. Every element should justify its existence.
 

package/template/.agents/skills/design/impeccable/reference/doctor.md

@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ The same restraint applies to `workspace-context-inherited`. Inheritance is a de
 
 - `workspace-platform-native-evidence` is the finding that matters most here: a workspace carrying native build files while inheriting a root record that resolves to web gets web guidance for its whole life and never loads [ios.md](ios.md) or [android.md](android.md). The repair is a child PRODUCT.md in that workspace, because one inherited record cannot hold two platforms.
 - `config-project-roots-match-nothing` means every `projectRoots` glob missed, so the repo root is silently standing in as the active project. A renamed workspace directory is the usual cause. Report the patterns and ask which directories they should name.
+- `config-invalid-build-path` and `config-build-path-unset` both concern one key, `buildPath` in `.impeccable/config.json` (or the gitignored `.impeccable/config.local.json`, which wins for that developer). It holds `comp` or `code` and sets whether new surfaces are built from a generated comp or straight in code. An unread value does not fall back to the opposite path, so a project meaning `code` has been building comp-led; report the exact value. The unset finding fires only where a project has done direction work and never recorded a preference, and the offer belongs in it only when image generation exists in your tool surface. Without image generation there is nothing to choose and nothing to say.
 - Use the `workspaces` table to show the user which apps carry their own context, which inherit, and which have none, before proposing any change.
 
 ## Opting out of the boot check

package/template/.agents/skills/design/impeccable/reference/document.md

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Omit irrelevant sections rather than filling them with invented rules. Put respo
 - An existing `DESIGN.md` is stale (the design has drifted).
 - Before a large redesign, to capture the current state as a reference.
 
-If a `DESIGN.md` already exists, **do not silently overwrite it**. Show the user the existing file and ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. whether to refresh, overwrite, or merge.
+If a `DESIGN.md` already exists, **do not silently overwrite it**. Show the user the existing file first. Ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. The choice is refresh, overwrite, or merge.
 
 ## Two paths
 

package/template/.agents/skills/design/impeccable/reference/extract.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Identify reusable patterns, components, and design tokens, then extract and cons
 
 Find the design system, component library, or shared UI directory. Understand its structure: component organization, naming conventions, design token structure, import/export conventions.
 
-**CRITICAL**: If no design system exists, ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. before creating one. Understand the preferred location and structure first.
+**CRITICAL**: If no design system exists, do not create one yet. Ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. Understand the preferred location and structure first.
 
 ## Step 2: Identify Patterns
 

package/template/.agents/skills/design/impeccable/reference/hooks.md

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 
 Manage the **design detector hook** for the current project.
 
-The hook runs the impeccable design detector on direct file edits to design-relevant files (`.tsx`, `.jsx`, `.html`, `.vue`, `.svelte`, `.astro`, `.css`, `.scss`, `.sass`, `.less`, `.ts`, `.js`). Claude Code, Codex, and GitHub Copilot use a post-tool-use hook and push a short system reminder into the agent's context after the edit; findings get a correction prompt, pending issues get a re-nudge, and clean UI-ish files get a short ack unless quiet mode is on (`hook.quiet` in config). Plain `.ts` and `.js` files are still scanned, but stay quiet unless the detector finds something. Cursor uses `preToolUse` to block bad proposed writes before they land and stays silent when it allows a clean write.
+The hook runs the impeccable design detector on direct file edits to design-relevant files (`.tsx`, `.jsx`, `.html`, `.vue`, `.svelte`, `.astro`, `.css`, `.scss`, `.sass`, `.less`, `.ts`, `.js`). Claude Code, Codex, and GitHub Copilot use a post-tool-use hook and push a short system reminder into the agent's context after the edit; findings get a correction prompt, pending issues get a re-nudge, and clean UI-ish files get a short ack unless quiet mode is on (`hook.quiet` in config). Plain `.ts` and `.js` files are still scanned, but stay quiet unless the detector finds something. Cursor uses `preToolUse` to block bad proposed writes before they land and stays silent when it allows a clean write. Grok Build fires the same PostToolUse scan to mark touched files, then surfaces findings on Stop `additionalContext`. Do not expect a Grok per-edit reminder: Grok discards that stdout.
 
-The detector rules run in two tiers. The per-edit hook surfaces only the immediate tier: mechanical, unambiguous problems worth interrupting an edit for, such as broken images, overflowing or clipped content, contrast and legibility failures, gradient text, glow shadows, and design-system drift. Everything else (copy cadence, palette and typography taste, layout rhythm) is deferred to a deep pass on the `Stop` hook event, which runs the full rule set over every UI file touched in the session and surfaces the remaining findings once, deduplicated against what the per-edit pass already reported. A session with nothing left to report stops silently. Set `hook.perEditRules` to `"all"` in `.impeccable/config.json` to restore the full rule set on every edit. The Stop deep pass is wired for Claude Code and Codex, which both dispatch a native `Stop` hook event. Cursor does not get one (its stop hook is not consistently dispatched; the pre-write gate covers it), and GitHub Copilot's stop-style events do not feed context back to the model, so they keep the full detector per edit.
+The detector rules run in two tiers. The per-edit hook surfaces only the immediate tier: mechanical, unambiguous problems worth interrupting an edit for, such as broken images, overflowing or clipped content, contrast and legibility failures, gradient text, glow shadows, and design-system drift. Everything else (copy cadence, palette and typography taste, layout rhythm) is deferred to a deep pass on the `Stop` hook event, which runs the full rule set over every UI file touched in the session and surfaces the remaining findings once, deduplicated against what the per-edit pass already reported. A session with nothing left to report stops silently. Set `hook.perEditRules` to `"all"` in `.impeccable/config.json` to restore the full rule set on every edit. The Stop deep pass is wired for Claude Code, Codex, and Grok Build, which dispatch a native `Stop` hook event. Cursor does not get one (its stop hook is not consistently dispatched; the pre-write gate covers it), and GitHub Copilot's stop-style events do not feed context back to the model, so they keep the full detector per edit. Grok also fires an observe-only Stop with `reason: "shutdown"` after `end_turn`; skip that one, scan only `end_turn`.
 
 Every hook is a mechanical pass. The reflexes no scanner catches live in [craft-floor.md](craft-floor.md), which the skill loads before it edits UI, so they apply whether or not a hook is wired. A session with no automatic hook gets one `MANUAL_DETECTOR_REQUIRED` directive from `context.mjs` asking for a single detector run at the end.
 
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Declare server-side template extensions under **`detector.extensions`** when the
 
 Manual `npx impeccable detect` scans use the same project filter config by default: `detector.ignoreRules`, `detector.ignoreFiles`, `detector.ignoreValues`, and `detector.designSystem.enabled`. `hook.enabled` only controls automatic hook execution, not manual CLI scans. Use `npx impeccable detect --no-config ...` for a raw detector run that ignores project config/context. Use `npx impeccable ignores ...` for direct CLI CRUD on the same detector ignores.
 
-Supported harnesses: Claude Code (`.claude/settings.local.json` in the project, which is gitignored so the hook stays machine-local; a hook you move into the shared `settings.json` is honored in place too), Codex (`.codex/hooks.json` in the project), Cursor (`.cursor/hooks.json` in the project), and GitHub Copilot (`.github/hooks/impeccable.json` in the project, a team-shared committed file that both the Copilot CLI and the cloud agent read). For the Copilot CLI, repo-level hooks fire once `.github/hooks/impeccable.json` is committed to the repository's default branch.
+Supported harnesses: Claude Code (`.claude/settings.local.json` in the project, which is gitignored so the hook stays machine-local; a hook you move into the shared `settings.json` is honored in place too), Codex (`.codex/hooks.json` in the project), Cursor (`.cursor/hooks.json` in the project), Grok Build (`.grok/hooks/impeccable.json` in the project; requires `/hooks-trust` or `--trust`), and GitHub Copilot (`.github/hooks/impeccable.json` in the project, a team-shared committed file that both the Copilot CLI and the cloud agent read). For the Copilot CLI, repo-level hooks fire once `.github/hooks/impeccable.json` is committed to the repository's default branch.
 
 On **Cursor**, `preToolUse` checks proposed Write/Edit/Shell write content and denies only when the real detector finds an issue. The denial message is visible to the agent as the tool error, so the agent can reconsider before the bad write lands.
 
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The first argument is the action. Defaults to `status`.
 | `ignore-value <id> <value> [--shared] [--reason "..."]` | Append a rule/value suppression to shared `.impeccable/config.json`. |
 | `ignore-value <id> <value> --local [--reason "..."]` | Append a private rule/value suppression to `.impeccable/config.local.json`. |
 | `ignore-value <id> "*" --file <glob> [--file <glob>...]` | Turn one rule off in matching files only, leaving it active everywhere else. Repeat `--file`, or use `--file=<glob>` / `--files=<glob>`. A bare `"*"` with no `--file` is refused: use `ignore-rule <id>` if you really mean project-wide. |
-| `reset` | Delete the project config, dedup cache, and Cursor pending queue. |
+| `reset` | Delete the project config, dedup cache, and Cursor pending queue, and remove the hook's entries from every provider manifest `on` installs, the committed Copilot file included (a team-shared `settings.json` that `on` never writes is never touched). |
 
 ## Flow
 
@@ -44,18 +44,24 @@ The first argument is the action. Defaults to `status`.
    ```
 
 3. If `<action>` is `off`, follow up with a one-line note: "Done. New edits will not trigger the design hook in this project until you run `/impeccable hooks on`."
-4. If `<action>` is `on`, follow up with: "Done. The design hook will fire after the next Edit/Write/MultiEdit on a UI file."
+4. If `<action>` is `on`, follow up with: "Done. The design hook will fire after the next Edit/Write on a UI file."
 5. If `<action>` is `ignore-value`, `ignore-file`, or `ignore-rule`, just print the script output. The default scope is shared `.impeccable/config.json`; add `--local` only when the user explicitly asks for a private exception.
 6. If `<action>` is `status`, just print the script output. Do not add commentary unless the user asked a follow-up question.
 
-## Intentional findings
+## Triage findings
 
-The hook itself never writes ignore config. Persist an exception only after the user explicitly confirms the flagged issue is intentional, and always go through `hook-admin.mjs`.
+The hook itself never writes ignore config; every exception goes through `hook-admin.mjs`. Triage each finding into one of three outcomes:
+
+- **Real design problem**: fix it. Never add an ignore to skip a fix or to push a blocked write through.
+- **Confident false positive or sanctioned exception**: persist the narrowest ignore yourself and disclose it in your reply. The bar is evidence you can name: an intentional demo or fixture, documentation of bad design, literal or domain-appropriate motion (a ball that bounces), or a choice the user already confirmed. Put that evidence in `--reason` as `"<who decided: evidence>"`; write "user confirmed" only when the user actually did.
+- **Unsure**: leave the finding standing and ask the user in one line. Ask once; a one-line question costs less than the hook re-firing on every later edit.
+
+Self-serve stops at `ignore-value`. `ignore-file` and `ignore-rule` silence too much to add on your own judgment; ask the user first.
 
 Prefer the narrowest exception:
 
-- If the finding line shows an exact `ignore-value` command, run that command. This writes shared `.impeccable/config.json` by default.
-- For value-specific findings such as `overused-font` and `bounce-easing`, use `ignore-value` when the user confirms the specific value. Do not use `ignore-rule overused-font` for a specific font.
+- If the finding line shows an `ignore-value <rule> <value>` pair, pass it to `hook-admin.mjs ignore-value` with your `--reason`. This writes shared `.impeccable/config.json` by default.
+- For value-specific findings such as `overused-font` and `bounce-easing`, use `ignore-value` for the specific value. Do not use `ignore-rule overused-font` for a specific font.
 - If the finding has no value-specific command, such as `side-tab`, scope that one rule to the file: `ignore-value <id> "*" --file <path>`. Run `npx impeccable detect <path>` first to see what actually fires there.
 - Reach for `ignore-file <path>` only when the whole file is out of scope for design review: a fixture, a generated artifact, a deliberate slop demo. It silences every rule for that file permanently, including rules that have not been written yet. A real UI surface with one noisy rule wants the file-scoped value ignore above.
 - Use `ignore-rule <id>` only when the user asks to suppress that whole rule across the project. For broad overused-font suppression, use `ignore-rule overused-font --all-values` only when the user asks to ignore overused fonts generally.
@@ -67,10 +73,10 @@ Example value-specific exception:
 node .pi/skills/impeccable/scripts/hook-admin.mjs ignore-value overused-font Inter --shared --reason "User confirmed Inter is intentional"
 ```
 
-Example intentional motion exception:
+Example self-served exception, with the evidence named:
 
 ```bash
-node .pi/skills/impeccable/scripts/hook-admin.mjs ignore-value bounce-easing bounce-ball --shared --reason "User confirmed ball bounce animation is intentional"
+node .pi/skills/impeccable/scripts/hook-admin.mjs ignore-value bounce-easing bounce-ball --shared --reason "Agent: literal ball-bounce animation, bounce easing is the subject"
 ```
 
 Example whole-rule font exception:

package/template/.agents/skills/design/impeccable/reference/init.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Form a platform hypothesis: `web`, `ios`, `android`, or `adaptive` (one product
 
 ## Step 3: Interview for product truth
 
-ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. Ask only about material gaps the repository and original request do not answer with strong evidence.
+Ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer. Ask only about material gaps the repository and original request do not answer with strong evidence.
 
 Use the structured question tool when available; otherwise ask and wait. Keep rounds to at most three focused questions and require one real answer or approval round before writing a new PRODUCT.md. Confirm inferences.
 
@@ -107,9 +107,15 @@ When the platform you just recorded is `ios`, `android`, or `adaptive`, load [io
 
 Before loading new-work or resuming shape/build, verify that PRODUCT.md exists at the resolved path and contains the confirmed product record. If the file is absent, init is incomplete. Do not substitute interview notes, a planning packet, or later design prose for the file.
 
-## Step 5: Configure live mode when useful
+## Step 5: Record workflow defaults
 
-Skip native or non-runnable projects and leave existing config untouched. Otherwise follow [live.md](live.md)'s first-time setup. Any CSP source edit still requires its stated consent.
+When image generation is available and no `buildPath` is recorded yet, ask once how new surfaces should be built. Availability means a harness-native image tool or the API fallback that context.mjs reports as `IMAGE_GEN_AVAILABLE`, and the first of those leaves no trace in the boot output: context.mjs only sees the key, so a silent boot on a harness that generates images is not evidence there is nothing to ask about. This is its own question, never a clause riding inside another one. The stack round asks what to build with; this asks how the building starts, and an answer to the first carries no consent about the second. State the trade in the question the user actually reads, because the two names mean nothing to someone meeting them for the first time: **comp-first** (an image sets the bar before any code; bolder composition, slower, and the build must match the image) or **code-first** (build directly; the ambition is written into the direction contract and audited at the finish; leaner, faster).
+
+Write the answer to `.impeccable/config.json` as `"buildPath": "comp"` or `"buildPath": "code"`, merging with the keys already there. Write only the value the user chose. A recommendation you made is not an answer you received, and a value taken from silence is a standing default nobody set: it then rides every future round in the project, which is the opposite of asking once. When the question goes unanswered, record nothing and say in one line which path this session is taking and that it is not stored. That path is comp-first, the default new-work applies wherever image generation exists and nothing is recorded; name it rather than choosing a quieter one, because a silent default invented here is the same failure as a value written without an answer. Unset is a working state, not a gap: the decision page's toggle governs each session, and new-work's one-time offer records the answer the first time the user flips it. The config is the only place this lives. It is a workflow setting, not product truth, so it never joins `## Stack` or any other PRODUCT.md section, where a second copy would outlive the setting and steer rounds nobody could trace back to it.
+
+A value already recorded in `.impeccable/config.json` or the gitignored `.impeccable/config.local.json` is a confirmed answer: on a re-run, honor it in silence rather than asking again. This is a default, not a lock: the decision page renders a toggle whose flip binds a single session and is never written back. Without image generation there is no choice to record; code-first is the only path.
+
+Then configure live mode when useful: skip native or non-runnable projects and leave existing config untouched. Otherwise follow [live.md](live.md)'s first-time setup. Any CSP source edit still requires its stated consent.
 
 ## Step 6: Wrap up or resume
 

package/template/.agents/skills/design/impeccable/reference/ios.md

@@ -43,3 +43,9 @@ Would a fluent iPhone user trust this app, or pause at off-spec controls? The te
 
 - **System transitions.** Push slides, sheets rise, dismiss reverses the entrance. Custom transitions that fight the navigation model disorient.
 - **Honor Reduce Motion.** Crossfade instead of parallax and large slides.
+
+## Verifying the build
+
+- **Screenshots come from the Simulator, never a browser.** Build and run, then capture with `xcrun simctl io booted screenshot <path>` (with several running, replace `booted` with the target's UDID from `xcrun simctl list devices booted`; display names can collide, the UDID never does). Capture every device class the app ships to, at least one iPhone and, when iPad is a target, one iPad, and write the files where the review flow expects them.
+- **Dark Mode and Dynamic Type belong in the pass.** `xcrun simctl ui booted appearance dark` flips appearance, reusing the capture's UDID when several are booted; a check at a large Dynamic Type size catches the truncation a fixed layout hides.
+- **Simulators give breadth; posture, gestures, and performance need hardware.** Say which one produced the evidence.