qa-engineer 0.9.1 → 0.10.0

package/shared/analysis/lib/qa_analysis/diff_guard.py

@@ -1,327 +0,0 @@
-"""The diff guard: a deterministic protection layer against unsafe "fixes".
-
-Given a unified diff of test code, it flags changes that make a suite pass
-without proving the software works. Each flag explains why it is unsafe. It
-never edits; it only judges.
-
-The guard has two jobs, and they pull against each other:
-
-1. **Catch every way a suite is made to lie.** Deleting or weakening
-   assertions, skipping, forcing a pass, excluding specs from the run, making the
-   test command always exit zero, swallowing failures, inflating timeouts,
-   deleting test files.
-2. **Not cry wolf on real repairs.** Healing a stale locator *is* the job of
-   `/qa-fix`, and it necessarily rewrites an assertion line. A guard that flags
-   every legitimate repair as `high` trains the agent — and the human — to
-   override it, which is worse than having no guard.
-
-Job 2 is why assertions are compared by **strength** rather than by presence. An
-assertion replaced by one that is at least as strong, keeping the same expected
-values, is a modification worth confirming (`low`) — not a removal (`high`). An
-assertion replaced by a weaker one, or one that drops the expected value, is
-`weakened-assertion` (`high`), because that is how a test quietly stops checking
-anything.
-"""
-
-import re
-
-# --- assertion recognition ---------------------------------------------------
-
-_ASSERTION = re.compile(r"(?i)\b(expect|assert|should|toBe|toEqual|toHaveText|toBeVisible|toContain|assertThat)\b")
-
-# Matchers that pin a specific value or state. Replacing one of these with a
-# weaker matcher means the test no longer checks what it used to.
-_STRONG_MATCHERS = re.compile(
-    r"(?i)\b(toBe|toEqual|toStrictEqual|toHaveText|toContainText|toHaveValue|toHaveURL|"
-    r"toHaveTitle|toHaveCount|toHaveLength|toHaveAttribute|toHaveClass|toHaveScreenshot|"
-    r"toMatch|toMatchObject|toMatchSnapshot|toBeVisible|toBeChecked|toBeEnabled|toBeDisabled|"
-    r"toBeEmpty|toBeGreaterThan|toBeLessThan|toBeCloseTo|"
-    r"assertEqual|assertEquals|assertIn|assertTrue|assertFalse|isEqualTo|containsExactly)\b"
-)
-
-# Matchers that only prove something exists or is loosely truthy.
-_WEAK_MATCHERS = re.compile(
-    r"(?i)\b(toBeDefined|toBeUndefined|toBeTruthy|toBeFalsy|toBeNull|toBeNaN|toBeAttached|"
-    r"toBeOk|assertIsNotNone|assertIsNone|isNotNull|isNotEmpty|notNull|toBeInstanceOf)\b"
-)
-
-# A soft assertion does not stop the test at the point of failure; swapping a
-# hard assertion for a soft one weakens it.
-_SOFT_ASSERTION = re.compile(r"(?i)\b(expect\.soft|softAssert|assertSoftly)\b")
-
-# String and numeric literals — the expected values an assertion pins down.
-_STRING_LITERAL = re.compile(r"""(['"])((?:(?!\1).){2,})\1""")
-_NUMBER_LITERAL = re.compile(r"(?<![\w.])\d+(?:\.\d+)?(?![\w.])")
-
-_IDENTIFIER = re.compile(r"[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*")
-
-# --- unsafe-change patterns --------------------------------------------------
-
-_SKIP_ADDED = re.compile(
-    r"(?i)(\.skip\b|\.fixme\b|\bxit\b|\bxdescribe\b|test\.skip|it\.skip|describe\.skip|"
-    r"@pytest\.mark\.skip|@Ignore\b|@Disabled\b|\.only\b|this\.skip\(|t\.Skip\()"
-)
-_FORCED_PASS = re.compile(
-    r"(?i)(assert\s+True\b|expect\(true\)\.toBe\(true\)|expect\(1\)\.toBe\(1\)|"
-    r"return\s*;?\s*//\s*pass|assert\s+1\s*==\s*1|pass\s*#\s*(?:todo|skip|pass))"
-)
-
-# A bare early return inside a test body ends the test before it verifies
-# anything — the quietest way to fake a pass. Only value-free returns count, so
-# `return page.click(...)` and `return await expect(...)` stay clean.
-_EARLY_RETURN = re.compile(r"^\s*(?:if\s*\(.*?\)\s*\{?\s*)?return\s*;?\s*\}?\s*$")
-
-# Excluding specs from the run drops coverage without touching a test file.
-_SUITE_EXCLUSION = re.compile(
-    r"(?i)(testIgnore|testPathIgnorePatterns|excludeSpecPattern|"
-    r"exclude\s*[:=]|ignorePatterns|--grep-invert|--ignore-pattern|"
-    r"specs?\s*:\s*\[\s*\]|testMatch\s*[:=]\s*\[\s*\])"
-)
-
-# Making the test command exit zero regardless of the result.
-_FORCED_PASS_COMMAND = re.compile(
-    r"(?i)(\|\|\s*true\b|\|\|\s*exit\s+0\b|;\s*exit\s+0\b|--passWithNoTests\b|"
-    r"--pass-with-no-tests\b|continue-on-error\s*:\s*true|set\s+\+e\b|"
-    r"-DskipTests\b|--exit-zero\b|\|\|\s*:)"
-)
-
-# A catch block that discards the failure.
-_SWALLOWED_FAILURE = re.compile(r"(?i)(catch\s*(?:\([^)]*\))?\s*\{\s*\}|except\s*[\w.]*\s*:\s*pass\b)")
-_CATCH_ADDED = re.compile(r"(?i)(\bcatch\s*[({]|^\s*except\b)")
-
-_TIMEOUT = re.compile(r"(?i)(timeout|setTimeout|wait_?for|implicitly_wait|setDefaultTimeout)\D{0,20}?(\d{3,})")
-# Deliberately excludes `expect(`: an expectation is an assertion, not a wait,
-# and including it made this rule unreachable.
-_WAIT = re.compile(r"(?i)(waitFor\w*|wait_?for\w*|\.wait\(|awaitVisible|implicitly_wait)")
-_LOCATOR = re.compile(r"""(?i)(getBy\w+|locator|find_element|\$\(|css=|xpath=|By\.\w+)""")
-_EMPTY_BODY = re.compile(r"(?i)(async\s+)?(\([^)]*\)\s*=>\s*\{\s*\}|function[^{]*\{\s*\}|def\s+test\w*\([^)]*\):\s*pass)")
-_RETRY = re.compile(r"(?i)(retries?\s*[:=]\s*(\d+)|\.retry\((\d+)\))")
-
-_TEST_FILE = re.compile(r"(?i)(\.spec\.|\.test\.|_test\.|test_|/tests?/|/e2e/|\.feature$|Test\.java$|Tests\.cs$)")
-
-MASS_DELETION_THRESHOLD = 15
-
-# How much token overlap makes an added assertion the counterpart of a removed
-# one. Tuned so a locator rewrite on the same expectation pairs up, while two
-# unrelated assertions in the same file do not.
-_COUNTERPART_THRESHOLD = 0.34
-
-
-def _parse_diff(diff_text):
-    """Yield (hunk_file, sign, text) for each changed line. sign is '+' or '-'."""
-    current = "unknown"
-    for line in diff_text.splitlines():
-        if line.startswith("+++ ") or line.startswith("--- "):
-            path = line[4:].strip()
-            if path not in ("/dev/null", ""):
-                current = re.sub(r"^[ab]/", "", path)
-            continue
-        if line.startswith("@@"):
-            continue
-        if line.startswith("+") and not line.startswith("+++"):
-            yield (current, "+", line[1:])
-        elif line.startswith("-") and not line.startswith("---"):
-            yield (current, "-", line[1:])
-
-
-def _deleted_files(diff_text):
-    """Files whose new side is /dev/null — deleted outright."""
-    deleted, pending = set(), None
-    for line in diff_text.splitlines():
-        if line.startswith("--- "):
-            path = line[4:].strip()
-            pending = re.sub(r"^[ab]/", "", path) if path != "/dev/null" else None
-        elif line.startswith("+++ "):
-            if line[4:].strip() == "/dev/null" and pending:
-                deleted.add(pending)
-            pending = None
-    return deleted
-
-
-def _tokens(text):
-    return {t.lower() for t in _IDENTIFIER.findall(text)}
-
-
-def _literals(text):
-    strings = {m.group(2) for m in _STRING_LITERAL.finditer(text)}
-    numbers = set(_NUMBER_LITERAL.findall(text))
-    return strings, numbers
-
-
-def _strength(text):
-    """3 = pins a value/state, 2 = unclassified assertion, 1 = existence only."""
-    if _SOFT_ASSERTION.search(text):
-        return 1
-    if _WEAK_MATCHERS.search(text) and not _STRONG_MATCHERS.search(text):
-        return 1
-    if _STRONG_MATCHERS.search(text):
-        return 3
-    return 2
-
-
-def _counterpart(removed_text, candidates):
-    """The added assertion line most plausibly replacing this removed one."""
-    removed_tokens = _tokens(removed_text)
-    if not removed_tokens:
-        return None
-    best, best_score = None, 0.0
-    for text in candidates:
-        overlap = removed_tokens & _tokens(text)
-        score = len(overlap) / max(len(removed_tokens), 1)
-        if score > best_score:
-            best, best_score = text, score
-    return best if best_score >= _COUNTERPART_THRESHOLD else None
-
-
-def check_diff(diff_text):
-    """Analyze a unified diff. Returns a list of issue dicts:
-    {rule, severity, file, why, sample}. An empty list means no unsafe change
-    was detected (which is not a guarantee of correctness, only of safety)."""
-    issues = []
-    removed = [(f, t) for f, s, t in _parse_diff(diff_text) if s == "-"]
-    added = [(f, t) for f, s, t in _parse_diff(diff_text) if s == "+"]
-    deleted_files = _deleted_files(diff_text)
-
-    def flag(rule, severity, file, why, sample):
-        issues.append({"rule": rule, "severity": severity, "file": file,
-                       "why": why, "sample": str(sample).strip()[:200]})
-
-    added_by_file = {}
-    for file, text in added:
-        added_by_file.setdefault(file, []).append(text)
-
-    # --- removed or weakened assertions --------------------------------------
-    for file, text in removed:
-        if _ASSERTION.search(text):
-            same_file_added = added_by_file.get(file, [])
-            # An identical line re-added is a move, not a change.
-            if any(a.strip() == text.strip() for a in same_file_added):
-                continue
-
-            assertion_candidates = [a for a in same_file_added if _ASSERTION.search(a)]
-            replacement = _counterpart(text, assertion_candidates)
-
-            if replacement is None:
-                if file in deleted_files:
-                    continue  # reported once as a deleted test file, below
-                flag("removed-assertion", "high", file,
-                     "An assertion or expectation was removed with nothing replacing it; "
-                     "a test that no longer asserts proves nothing.", text)
-                continue
-
-            old_strength, new_strength = _strength(text), _strength(replacement)
-            old_strings, old_numbers = _literals(text)
-            new_strings, new_numbers = _literals(replacement)
-            dropped_strings = old_strings - new_strings
-            dropped_numbers = old_numbers - new_numbers
-
-            if new_strength < old_strength:
-                flag("weakened-assertion", "high", file,
-                     "An assertion was replaced by a weaker one (existence or truthiness "
-                     "instead of a specific value or state); the test can now pass without "
-                     "the behaviour being correct.", replacement)
-            elif dropped_strings or dropped_numbers:
-                dropped = sorted(dropped_strings | dropped_numbers)
-                flag("weakened-assertion", "high", file,
-                     "An assertion kept its matcher but dropped the expected value(s) "
-                     f"{dropped}; it no longer pins down what it used to.", replacement)
-            else:
-                flag("assertion-modified", "low", file,
-                     "An assertion was rewritten with equal or greater strength and the same "
-                     "expected values — consistent with a legitimate repair. Confirm it still "
-                     "targets the same behaviour.", replacement)
-
-        if _WAIT.search(text) and not _ASSERTION.search(text):
-            flag("removed-wait", "medium", file,
-                 "A wait/synchronization was removed, which can mask a real failure or "
-                 "introduce flakiness.", text)
-
-    # --- added skips, forced passes, early returns, empty bodies -------------
-    for file, text in added:
-        if _SKIP_ADDED.search(text):
-            flag("added-skip-or-only", "high", file,
-                 "A skip/ignore/only marker was added; skipping or narrowing hides failures "
-                 "instead of fixing them.", text)
-        if _FORCED_PASS.search(text):
-            flag("forced-pass", "high", file,
-                 "A tautological or forced-pass assertion was added; it makes the test pass "
-                 "without checking behavior.", text)
-        if _EMPTY_BODY.search(text):
-            flag("empty-test-body", "high", file,
-                 "A test body was emptied; an empty test passes vacuously.", text)
-        if _EARLY_RETURN.match(text) and _TEST_FILE.search(file):
-            flag("conditional-skip", "high", file,
-                 "An unconditional or condition-guarded early return was added to a test; "
-                 "the test exits before verifying anything, which is a skip in disguise.", text)
-        if _SUITE_EXCLUSION.search(text):
-            flag("suite-exclusion", "high", file,
-                 "Specs were excluded from the run (ignore pattern, exclusion list, or empty "
-                 "spec list); coverage is dropped without any test file changing.", text)
-        if _FORCED_PASS_COMMAND.search(text):
-            flag("forced-pass-command", "high", file,
-                 "The test command was made to succeed regardless of the result "
-                 "(`|| true`, `exit 0`, `--passWithNoTests`, `continue-on-error`); the suite "
-                 "can no longer fail a pipeline.", text)
-        if _SWALLOWED_FAILURE.search(text):
-            flag("swallowed-failure", "high", file,
-                 "A failure is caught and discarded; an assertion inside a swallowed catch "
-                 "cannot fail the test.", text)
-        elif _CATCH_ADDED.search(text) and _TEST_FILE.search(file):
-            flag("added-error-handling", "medium", file,
-                 "Error handling was added inside a test; confirm the failure still surfaces "
-                 "rather than being caught and logged.", text)
-
-    # --- deleted test files --------------------------------------------------
-    for file in sorted(deleted_files):
-        if _TEST_FILE.search(file):
-            flag("test-file-deleted", "high", file,
-                 "A test file was deleted outright; every case it held stops running, "
-                 "regardless of the file's size.", file)
-
-    # --- timeout inflation and unsafe retry increases -------------------------
-    _flag_numeric_inflation(_TIMEOUT, removed, added, "timeout-inflation", "medium",
-                            "A timeout was increased substantially, which can paper over a real slowness or hang.", flag)
-    _flag_numeric_inflation(_RETRY, removed, added, "unsafe-retry-increase", "medium",
-                            "Retry count was increased, which can convert a real failure into an intermittent pass.", flag)
-
-    # --- suspicious locator changes ------------------------------------------
-    removed_locators = {f: t for f, t in removed if _LOCATOR.search(t)}
-    for file, text in added:
-        if _LOCATOR.search(text) and file in removed_locators and text.strip() != removed_locators[file].strip():
-            flag("suspicious-locator-change", "low", file,
-                 "A locator was changed; confirm it targets the same element and was not "
-                 "loosened to pass.", text)
-
-    # --- mass deletion per file ----------------------------------------------
-    per_file = {}
-    for file, _ in removed:
-        per_file[file] = per_file.get(file, 0) + 1
-    for file, count in per_file.items():
-        if count >= MASS_DELETION_THRESHOLD and file not in deleted_files:
-            flag("mass-deletion", "high", file,
-                 f"{count} lines were deleted from a test file; large deletions can silently drop coverage.",
-                 f"{count} lines removed")
-
-    return issues
-
-
-def _flag_numeric_inflation(pattern, removed, added, rule, severity, why, flag):
-    def max_number(text):
-        nums = [int(n) for n in re.findall(r"\d{2,}", text)]
-        return max(nums) if nums else None
-
-    removed_by_file = {}
-    for file, text in removed:
-        if pattern.search(text):
-            value = max_number(text)
-            if value is not None:
-                removed_by_file.setdefault(file, []).append(value)
-    for file, text in added:
-        if pattern.search(text):
-            new_value = max_number(text)
-            if new_value is None:
-                continue
-            for old_value in removed_by_file.get(file, []):
-                if new_value >= old_value * 2 and new_value > old_value:
-                    flag(rule, severity, file, why, text)
-                    break

package/shared/analysis/lib/qa_analysis/discovery.py

@@ -1,113 +0,0 @@
-"""Deterministic artifact discovery.
-
-Locates the artifacts a run produced — automatically by convention or from
-explicit paths — and classifies each as present, partial, or corrupted. It
-handles multiple runs, parallel workers, and sharded output (many result files),
-and it reports what is missing rather than inventing it.
-"""
-
-import json
-import os
-import zipfile
-from glob import glob
-
-from .evidence import Artifact
-
-# Convention globs for known artifact types, relative to a run root.
-_PATTERNS = [
-    ("junit", ["**/results.xml", "**/junit*.xml", "**/*junit*.xml"]),
-    ("report", ["**/results.json", "**/report.json"]),
-    ("html-report", ["**/playwright-report/index.html", "**/*-report/index.html"]),
-    ("trace", ["**/trace.zip", "**/*-trace.zip"]),
-    ("har", ["**/*.har"]),
-    ("video", ["**/*.webm", "**/*.mp4"]),
-    ("screenshot", ["**/*.png", "**/*-actual.png"]),
-]
-
-
-def _integrity(artifact_type, path):
-    """Classify an artifact as present, partial (empty), or corrupted."""
-    try:
-        size = os.path.getsize(path)
-    except OSError:
-        return "missing"
-    if size == 0:
-        return "partial"
-    # Structural spot-checks for formats we can cheaply verify.
-    if artifact_type == "trace":
-        if not zipfile.is_zipfile(path):
-            return "corrupted"
-    elif artifact_type in ("report", "har"):
-        try:
-            with open(path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as handle:
-                json.load(handle)
-        except (json.JSONDecodeError, OSError, UnicodeDecodeError):
-            return "corrupted"
-    return "present"
-
-
-def discover(root=".", explicit=None, framework="unknown"):
-    """Discover artifacts under root, or validate explicit paths.
-
-    Returns {present: [Artifact...], partial: [...], corrupted: [...],
-    missing: [paths]}. Explicit paths that do not exist are reported as missing;
-    convention discovery never reports missing (absence is simply not found).
-    """
-    present, partial, corrupted, missing = [], [], [], []
-
-    def record(artifact_type, path):
-        state = _integrity(artifact_type, path)
-        artifact = Artifact(type=artifact_type, location=os.path.relpath(path, root)
-                            if os.path.isabs(path) else path, framework=framework,
-                            present=(state == "present"))
-        if state == "present":
-            present.append(artifact)
-        elif state == "partial":
-            partial.append(artifact)
-        elif state == "corrupted":
-            corrupted.append(artifact)
-        else:
-            missing.append(path)
-
-    if explicit:
-        for path in explicit:
-            if not os.path.exists(path):
-                missing.append(path)
-                continue
-            matched = next((t for t, _ in _PATTERNS if _matches_type(t, path)), "attachment")
-            record(matched, path)
-    else:
-        seen = set()
-        for artifact_type, patterns in _PATTERNS:
-            for pattern in patterns:
-                for path in sorted(glob(os.path.join(root, pattern), recursive=True)):
-                    if path in seen:
-                        continue
-                    seen.add(path)
-                    record(artifact_type, path)
-
-    return {
-        "present": present,
-        "partial": partial,
-        "corrupted": corrupted,
-        "missing": missing,
-    }
-
-
-def _matches_type(artifact_type, path):
-    lower = path.lower()
-    if artifact_type == "junit":
-        return lower.endswith(".xml")
-    if artifact_type == "report":
-        return lower.endswith(".json")
-    if artifact_type == "trace":
-        return lower.endswith(".zip")
-    if artifact_type == "har":
-        return lower.endswith(".har")
-    if artifact_type == "video":
-        return lower.endswith((".webm", ".mp4"))
-    if artifact_type == "screenshot":
-        return lower.endswith(".png")
-    if artifact_type == "html-report":
-        return lower.endswith(".html")
-    return False

package/shared/analysis/lib/qa_analysis/evidence.py

@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
-"""The evidence and finding model shared by every analyzer.
-
-Every finding an analyzer produces carries the same structure, so downstream
-skills (qa-debug, qa-report, qa-fix) consume one shape regardless of which
-analyzer or framework produced it. Text fields are redacted at construction.
-"""
-
-from dataclasses import dataclass, field, asdict
-from datetime import datetime, timezone
-
-from .redaction import redact_text
-
-EVIDENCE_TYPES = {
-    "trace", "har", "junit", "report", "console", "network", "stdout",
-    "stderr", "screenshot", "video", "log", "file", "diff",
-}
-
-
-def utc_now():
-    """ISO 8601 UTC timestamp. Isolated so tests can monkeypatch it."""
-    return datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat()
-
-
-@dataclass
-class Evidence:
-    """One observation supporting a finding. Excerpts are redacted."""
-    type: str
-    description: str
-    source: str
-    excerpt: str = ""
-
-    def __post_init__(self):
-        if self.type not in EVIDENCE_TYPES:
-            raise ValueError(f"unknown evidence type: {self.type}")
-        self.excerpt = redact_text(self.excerpt)
-
-    def to_dict(self):
-        data = {"type": self.type, "description": self.description, "source": self.source}
-        if self.excerpt:
-            data["excerpt"] = self.excerpt
-        return data
-
-
-@dataclass
-class Finding:
-    """A single diagnostic conclusion, traceable to a specific artifact.
-
-    Carries everything the evidence model requires: the artifact and location
-    it came from, when, why, the supporting evidence, a calibrated confidence,
-    the affected tests, related artifacts, and recommended actions.
-    """
-    classification: str
-    reason: str
-    artifact: str
-    location: str
-    confidence: float = None
-    timestamp: str = field(default_factory=utc_now)
-    evidence: list = field(default_factory=list)
-    affected_tests: list = field(default_factory=list)
-    related_artifacts: list = field(default_factory=list)
-    recommendations: list = field(default_factory=list)
-
-    def to_dict(self):
-        data = {
-            "classification": self.classification,
-            "reason": self.reason,
-            "artifact": self.artifact,
-            "location": self.location,
-            "timestamp": self.timestamp,
-            "evidence": [e.to_dict() if isinstance(e, Evidence) else e for e in self.evidence],
-            "affectedTests": self.affected_tests,
-            "relatedArtifacts": self.related_artifacts,
-            "recommendations": self.recommendations,
-        }
-        if self.confidence is not None:
-            data["confidence"] = self.confidence
-        return data
-
-
-@dataclass
-class AnalyzerOutput:
-    """The envelope an analyzer emits: findings plus the artifacts it examined.
-
-    A downstream skill wraps this in its own output contract; on its own it is
-    the deterministic, machine-readable result of one analysis.
-    """
-    analyzer: str
-    findings: list = field(default_factory=list)
-    artifacts: list = field(default_factory=list)
-    warnings: list = field(default_factory=list)
-    generated_at: str = field(default_factory=utc_now)
-
-    def to_dict(self):
-        return {
-            "analyzer": self.analyzer,
-            "generatedAt": self.generated_at,
-            "findings": [f.to_dict() if isinstance(f, Finding) else f for f in self.findings],
-            "artifacts": [a.to_dict() if hasattr(a, "to_dict") else a for a in self.artifacts],
-            "warnings": self.warnings,
-        }
-
-
-@dataclass
-class Artifact:
-    """A discovered artifact, in the common model shared with the execution engine."""
-    type: str
-    location: str
-    framework: str = "unknown"
-    ownership: str = "qa-analysis"
-    timestamp: str = field(default_factory=utc_now)
-    media_type: str = ""
-    test_ref: str = ""
-    present: bool = True
-
-    def to_dict(self):
-        data = {
-            "type": self.type,
-            "location": self.location,
-            "framework": self.framework,
-            "timestamp": self.timestamp,
-            "ownership": self.ownership,
-            "present": self.present,
-        }
-        if self.media_type:
-            data["mediaType"] = self.media_type
-        if self.test_ref:
-            data["testRef"] = self.test_ref
-        return data

package/shared/analysis/lib/qa_analysis/har.py

@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-"""HAR (HTTP Archive) parser.
-
-Framework-agnostic: a HAR is a standard JSON format, whoever produced it.
-Extracts request outcomes, flags failures and slow calls, and redacts headers
-and credentialed URLs before anything is exposed. A malformed HAR raises.
-"""
-
-import json
-
-from .redaction import redact_text, redact_headers
-from .junit import MalformedArtifact
-
-
-def parse_har(path, slow_ms=1000):
-    """Parse a HAR file into a redacted network summary.
-
-    Returns {entries, failures, slow, redacted: True}, where each entry is
-    {method, url, status, durationMs, headersRedacted}. Failures are entries
-    with status >= 400 or status 0 (no response). Raises MalformedArtifact on
-    unreadable input.
-    """
-    try:
-        with open(path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as handle:
-            data = json.load(handle)
-    except (json.JSONDecodeError, OSError, UnicodeDecodeError) as exc:
-        raise MalformedArtifact(f"could not parse HAR at {path}: {exc}") from exc
-
-    try:
-        raw_entries = data["log"]["entries"]
-    except (KeyError, TypeError) as exc:
-        raise MalformedArtifact(f"not a HAR document at {path}") from exc
-
-    entries = []
-    for item in raw_entries:
-        request = item.get("request", {})
-        response = item.get("response", {})
-        status = _int(response.get("status"))
-        entry = {
-            "method": request.get("method", ""),
-            # Redaction strips any credentials embedded in the URL.
-            "url": redact_text(request.get("url", "")),
-            "status": status,
-            "durationMs": int(round(float(item.get("time", 0) or 0))),
-            "requestHeaders": redact_headers(request.get("headers", [])),
-            "responseHeaders": redact_headers(response.get("headers", [])),
-        }
-        entries.append(entry)
-
-    failures = [e for e in entries if e["status"] == 0 or e["status"] >= 400]
-    slow = [e for e in entries if e["durationMs"] >= slow_ms]
-    return {"entries": entries, "failures": failures, "slow": slow, "redacted": True}
-
-
-def _int(value, default=0):
-    try:
-        return int(value)
-    except (TypeError, ValueError):
-        return default