pullfrog 0.1.68 → 0.1.69

package/dist/cli.mjs

@@ -110773,10 +110773,9 @@ var providers = {
       // was the catalog's only GLM route, and Grok had no Zen route at all.
       glm: {
         displayName: "GLM",
-        resolve: "opencode/glm-5.2",
-        effort: ["high", "max"],
-        openRouterEffort: ["high", "xhigh"],
-        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2"
+        resolve: "opencode/glm-5.3",
+        effort: ["low", "high", "max"],
+        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.3"
       },
       grok: {
         displayName: "Grok",
@@ -110823,10 +110822,11 @@ var providers = {
   // OpenCode Go is a separate $10/mo subscription from Zen, served on its own
   // base URL (`https://opencode.ai/zen/go/v1`) but authenticated with the SAME
   // `OPENCODE_API_KEY`. it carries the open-weight coding models plus a couple
-  // of frontier ones, and 14 of the ids below are served ONLY here — Zen's
-  // `/v1/models` does not list glm-5.3*, qwen3.7/3.8-*, mimo-*, longcat-2.0,
-  // hy3 or muse-spark. so for a Go subscriber this provider is not a duplicate
-  // route to Zen, it is the only route to most of what they pay for.
+  // of frontier ones, six of which are served ONLY here — Zen's `/v1/models`
+  // does not list qwen3.7/3.8-*, mimo-v2.5-pro, longcat-2.0 or hy3. (it listed
+  // no glm-5.3* either until 2026-09, which is why `opencode/glm` trailed on
+  // 5.2.) so for a Go subscriber this provider is not a duplicate route to Zen,
+  // it is the only route to a large part of what they pay for.
   // like `opencode` and `openrouter` this is a ROUTER, not a vendor: slugs and
   // display names mirror the upstream brand tier, and the picker groups them
   // under the upstream vendor.
@@ -110895,7 +110895,9 @@ var providers = {
         // `high` the Go route does not.
         effort: ["low", "medium", "xhigh"],
         openRouterEffort: ["minimal", "low", "medium", "high", "xhigh"],
-        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/qwen/qwen3.8-max"
+        // OpenRouter retired the rolling `qwen3.8-max` for a dated snapshot, so
+        // this side has to pin one; the Go route still carries the rolling id.
+        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/qwen/qwen3.8-max-0902"
       },
       "qwen-plus": {
         displayName: "Qwen Plus",
@@ -112252,7 +112254,7 @@ var import_semver = __toESM(require_semver2(), 1);
 // package.json
 var package_default = {
   name: "pullfrog",
-  version: "0.1.68",
+  version: "0.1.69",
   type: "module",
   bin: {
     pullfrog: "dist/cli.mjs",
@@ -113059,6 +113061,7 @@ For simple, well-defined tasks, skip the plan phase and go straight to build.`
    - record what was done (or why nothing was done)
 
 5. Quality check:
+   - re-call \`${t2("get_review_comments")}\` with \`fresh: true\` before committing: reviewers keep commenting while you work, and any thread it now returns that you have not addressed is in scope for this run.
    - test changes, then review the diff before committing \u2014 verify only intended changes are present, no debug artifacts remain, no fix turned out to be bloat in context (revert any that did), and the changes are clean enough that a senior engineer would approve without hesitation
    - ${commitStep}
 
@@ -113068,7 +113071,7 @@ For simple, well-defined tasks, skip the plan phase and go straight to build.`
    - **once the fix is live on the remote**, for each thread you acted on:
      - reply ONCE via \`${t2("reply_to_review_comment")}\`. The \`comment_id\` parameter takes the root comment's numeric \`id=\` (from the first \`comment author=...\` tag in the \`${t2("get_review_comments")}\` output) \u2014 NOT the \`thread=\` value; that's a separate GraphQL ID used by resolve. The runtime dedupes identical bodies within a session.
      - **immediately** call \`${t2("resolve_review_thread")}\` with that thread's \`thread=\` value as \`thread_id\`. Resolve every thread where you (a) made the requested code change in full \u2014 partial fixes leave the thread open \u2014 OR (b) replied with a substantive answer the user explicitly asked for. Do NOT resolve threads where you pushed back on the request and the disagreement is unresolved; leave those open for the human to mediate.
-   - call \`${t2("report_progress")}\` with a brief summary`
+   - call \`${t2("report_progress")}\` with a brief summary. If your last \`${t2("get_review_comments")}\` turned up threads you did not address, name them there \u2014 a review arriving this late is suppressed as a duplicate and nothing else will pick it up.`
     },
     // Review and IncrementalReview route the minimum reviewfrog specialists
     // needed to cover unresolved, disposition-changing hypotheses. Most runs
@@ -199174,7 +199177,10 @@ function extractFromFilePatches(hunks, startLine, endLine, side) {
 }
 var GetReviewComments = type({
   pull_number: type.number.describe("The pull request number"),
-  review_id: type.number.describe("The review ID to get comments for")
+  review_id: type.number.describe("The review ID to get comments for"),
+  "fresh?": type.boolean.describe(
+    "Bypass the 60s thread cache. Use for the re-read before committing, so comments that landed while you worked are actually seen; leave unset otherwise."
+  )
 });
 function hasThumbsUpFrom(comment, username) {
   if (!comment.reactionGroups) return false;
@@ -199208,7 +199214,7 @@ function formatReviewThreads(threadBlocks, header) {
   }
   const lines = [];
   lines.push(
-    `# Review Threads (${threadBlocks.length}) for PR #${header.pullNumber} - Review ${header.reviewId} by ${header.reviewer}`
+    `# Open Threads (${threadBlocks.length}) on PR #${header.pullNumber} - dispatched by Review ${header.reviewId} from ${header.reviewer}`
   );
   lines.push("");
   if (threadBlocks.length > 0) {
@@ -199349,11 +199355,27 @@ async function getReviewThreads(input2) {
     if (!thread?.comments?.nodes) return false;
     return thread.comments.nodes.some((c2) => c2?.pullRequestReview?.databaseId === input2.reviewId);
   });
-  if (!input2.approvedBy) {
-    return threadsForReview;
+  if (input2.approvedBy) {
+    const username = input2.approvedBy;
+    return threadsForReview.filter((thread) => threadHasThumbsUpFrom(thread, username));
   }
-  const username = input2.approvedBy;
-  return threadsForReview.filter((thread) => threadHasThumbsUpFrom(thread, username));
+  if (!input2.addressScope) return threadsForReview;
+  return [...threadsForReview, ...concurrentThreads(allThreads, threadsForReview, input2)];
+}
+function concurrentThreads(allThreads, threadsForReview, input2) {
+  const alreadyIncluded = new Set(threadsForReview.map((thread) => thread.id));
+  return allThreads.filter((thread) => {
+    if (!thread?.comments?.nodes || alreadyIncluded.has(thread.id)) return false;
+    if (thread.isResolved) return false;
+    const comments = thread.comments.nodes.filter((c2) => c2 !== null);
+    if (comments.length === 0) return false;
+    if (comments.some((c2) => isPullfrog(c2.author?.login))) return false;
+    return input2.addressScope === "all" || comments.some((c2) => mentionsPullfrog(c2.body));
+  });
+}
+function mentionsPullfrog(body) {
+  if (!body) return false;
+  return body.split(/\r?\n/).filter((line) => !line.trim().startsWith(">")).join("\n").toLowerCase().includes("@pullfrog");
 }
 function formatReviewData(input2) {
   const rawReviewBody = input2.review.body;
@@ -199450,6 +199472,7 @@ function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx) {
     parameters: GetReviewComments,
     execute: execute(async (params) => {
       const approvedBy = ctx.payload.event.trigger === "fix_review" && ctx.payload.event.approved_only ? ctx.payload.triggerer : void 0;
+      if (params.fresh) invalidateReviewThreadCache(ctx.repo);
       const result = await getReviewData({
         octokit: ctx.octokit,
         owner: ctx.repo.owner,
@@ -199457,6 +199480,7 @@ function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx) {
         pullNumber: params.pull_number,
         reviewId: params.review_id,
         approvedBy,
+        addressScope: ctx.payload.event.address_scope,
         tmpdir: ctx.tmpdir,
         githubToken: ctx.githubInstallationToken
       });
@@ -199487,7 +199511,7 @@ function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx) {
         threadCount: threadBlocks.length,
         commentsPath,
         toc: formatted.toc,
-        instructions: `the file at commentsPath contains ${threadBlocks.length} review threads with full conversation history. comments marked with * are from the target review (${params.review_id}). the TOC shows each thread's file:line and the line number where it appears in the file. to read a specific thread, use: grep -A 50 "^## <file:line>" ${commentsPath} (replace <file:line> with the path from the TOC, e.g. "^## action/utils/foo.ts:42"). address each thread in order, working through one file at a time.`
+        instructions: `the file at commentsPath contains ${threadBlocks.length} review threads with full conversation history. comments marked with * are from the target review (${params.review_id}); any other thread is open feedback on this PR that is also yours to address, including comments that landed after this run started. the TOC shows each thread's file:line and the line number where it appears in the file. to read a specific thread, use: grep -A 50 "^## <file:line>" ${commentsPath} (replace <file:line> with the path from the TOC, e.g. "^## action/utils/foo.ts:42"). address each thread in order, working through one file at a time.`
       };
     })
   });
@@ -204932,7 +204956,7 @@ function resolveTarget(repo) {
   return { owner: match3[1], repo: match3[2] };
 }
 function cliVersion() {
-  const parts = /^(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+)$/.exec("0.1.68");
+  const parts = /^(\d+)\.(\d+)\.(\d+)$/.exec("0.1.69");
   if (!parts) return "0.0.0";
   return `${Number(parts[1])}.${Number(parts[2])}.${Number(parts[3])}`;
 }
@@ -205099,7 +205123,7 @@ async function runCli5(input2) {
 }
 
 // cli.ts
-var VERSION10 = "0.1.68";
+var VERSION10 = "0.1.69";
 var bin = basename2(process.argv[1] || "");
 var PROG = bin === "pf" || bin === "pullfrog" ? bin : "pullfrog";
 var rawArgs = process.argv.slice(2);

package/dist/external.d.ts

@@ -137,6 +137,15 @@ interface PullRequestReviewSubmittedEvent extends BasePayloadEvent {
     body: string | null;
     review_state: string;
     branch: string;
+    /**
+     * How far past the dispatching review this run may read: `all` on a
+     * Pullfrog-authored PR, `mentions` when only `@pullfrog`-mentioning threads
+     * are in scope. The server already computes this to decide whether to
+     * dispatch; forwarding it is what lets `get_review_comments` pick up the
+     * comments that land while the run is working. Optional so a payload from an
+     * older server build still parses against a newer action.
+     */
+    address_scope?: "all" | "mentions" | undefined;
 }
 interface PullRequestReviewCommentCreatedEvent extends BasePayloadEvent {
     trigger: "pull_request_review_comment_created";

package/dist/index.js

@@ -108283,10 +108283,9 @@ var providers = {
       // was the catalog's only GLM route, and Grok had no Zen route at all.
       glm: {
         displayName: "GLM",
-        resolve: "opencode/glm-5.2",
-        effort: ["high", "max"],
-        openRouterEffort: ["high", "xhigh"],
-        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2"
+        resolve: "opencode/glm-5.3",
+        effort: ["low", "high", "max"],
+        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.3"
       },
       grok: {
         displayName: "Grok",
@@ -108333,10 +108332,11 @@ var providers = {
   // OpenCode Go is a separate $10/mo subscription from Zen, served on its own
   // base URL (`https://opencode.ai/zen/go/v1`) but authenticated with the SAME
   // `OPENCODE_API_KEY`. it carries the open-weight coding models plus a couple
-  // of frontier ones, and 14 of the ids below are served ONLY here — Zen's
-  // `/v1/models` does not list glm-5.3*, qwen3.7/3.8-*, mimo-*, longcat-2.0,
-  // hy3 or muse-spark. so for a Go subscriber this provider is not a duplicate
-  // route to Zen, it is the only route to most of what they pay for.
+  // of frontier ones, six of which are served ONLY here — Zen's `/v1/models`
+  // does not list qwen3.7/3.8-*, mimo-v2.5-pro, longcat-2.0 or hy3. (it listed
+  // no glm-5.3* either until 2026-09, which is why `opencode/glm` trailed on
+  // 5.2.) so for a Go subscriber this provider is not a duplicate route to Zen,
+  // it is the only route to a large part of what they pay for.
   // like `opencode` and `openrouter` this is a ROUTER, not a vendor: slugs and
   // display names mirror the upstream brand tier, and the picker groups them
   // under the upstream vendor.
@@ -108405,7 +108405,9 @@ var providers = {
         // `high` the Go route does not.
         effort: ["low", "medium", "xhigh"],
         openRouterEffort: ["minimal", "low", "medium", "high", "xhigh"],
-        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/qwen/qwen3.8-max"
+        // OpenRouter retired the rolling `qwen3.8-max` for a dated snapshot, so
+        // this side has to pin one; the Go route still carries the rolling id.
+        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/qwen/qwen3.8-max-0902"
       },
       "qwen-plus": {
         displayName: "Qwen Plus",
@@ -109762,7 +109764,7 @@ var import_semver = __toESM(require_semver2(), 1);
 // package.json
 var package_default = {
   name: "pullfrog",
-  version: "0.1.68",
+  version: "0.1.69",
   type: "module",
   bin: {
     pullfrog: "dist/cli.mjs",
@@ -110569,6 +110571,7 @@ For simple, well-defined tasks, skip the plan phase and go straight to build.`
    - record what was done (or why nothing was done)
 
 5. Quality check:
+   - re-call \`${t("get_review_comments")}\` with \`fresh: true\` before committing: reviewers keep commenting while you work, and any thread it now returns that you have not addressed is in scope for this run.
    - test changes, then review the diff before committing \u2014 verify only intended changes are present, no debug artifacts remain, no fix turned out to be bloat in context (revert any that did), and the changes are clean enough that a senior engineer would approve without hesitation
    - ${commitStep}
 
@@ -110578,7 +110581,7 @@ For simple, well-defined tasks, skip the plan phase and go straight to build.`
    - **once the fix is live on the remote**, for each thread you acted on:
      - reply ONCE via \`${t("reply_to_review_comment")}\`. The \`comment_id\` parameter takes the root comment's numeric \`id=\` (from the first \`comment author=...\` tag in the \`${t("get_review_comments")}\` output) \u2014 NOT the \`thread=\` value; that's a separate GraphQL ID used by resolve. The runtime dedupes identical bodies within a session.
      - **immediately** call \`${t("resolve_review_thread")}\` with that thread's \`thread=\` value as \`thread_id\`. Resolve every thread where you (a) made the requested code change in full \u2014 partial fixes leave the thread open \u2014 OR (b) replied with a substantive answer the user explicitly asked for. Do NOT resolve threads where you pushed back on the request and the disagreement is unresolved; leave those open for the human to mediate.
-   - call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with a brief summary`
+   - call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with a brief summary. If your last \`${t("get_review_comments")}\` turned up threads you did not address, name them there \u2014 a review arriving this late is suppressed as a duplicate and nothing else will pick it up.`
     },
     // Review and IncrementalReview route the minimum reviewfrog specialists
     // needed to cover unresolved, disposition-changing hypotheses. Most runs
@@ -196757,7 +196760,10 @@ function extractFromFilePatches(hunks, startLine, endLine, side) {
 }
 var GetReviewComments = type({
   pull_number: type.number.describe("The pull request number"),
-  review_id: type.number.describe("The review ID to get comments for")
+  review_id: type.number.describe("The review ID to get comments for"),
+  "fresh?": type.boolean.describe(
+    "Bypass the 60s thread cache. Use for the re-read before committing, so comments that landed while you worked are actually seen; leave unset otherwise."
+  )
 });
 function hasThumbsUpFrom(comment, username) {
   if (!comment.reactionGroups) return false;
@@ -196791,7 +196797,7 @@ function formatReviewThreads(threadBlocks, header) {
   }
   const lines = [];
   lines.push(
-    `# Review Threads (${threadBlocks.length}) for PR #${header.pullNumber} - Review ${header.reviewId} by ${header.reviewer}`
+    `# Open Threads (${threadBlocks.length}) on PR #${header.pullNumber} - dispatched by Review ${header.reviewId} from ${header.reviewer}`
   );
   lines.push("");
   if (threadBlocks.length > 0) {
@@ -196932,11 +196938,27 @@ async function getReviewThreads(input2) {
     if (!thread?.comments?.nodes) return false;
     return thread.comments.nodes.some((c) => c?.pullRequestReview?.databaseId === input2.reviewId);
   });
-  if (!input2.approvedBy) {
-    return threadsForReview;
+  if (input2.approvedBy) {
+    const username = input2.approvedBy;
+    return threadsForReview.filter((thread) => threadHasThumbsUpFrom(thread, username));
   }
-  const username = input2.approvedBy;
-  return threadsForReview.filter((thread) => threadHasThumbsUpFrom(thread, username));
+  if (!input2.addressScope) return threadsForReview;
+  return [...threadsForReview, ...concurrentThreads(allThreads, threadsForReview, input2)];
+}
+function concurrentThreads(allThreads, threadsForReview, input2) {
+  const alreadyIncluded = new Set(threadsForReview.map((thread) => thread.id));
+  return allThreads.filter((thread) => {
+    if (!thread?.comments?.nodes || alreadyIncluded.has(thread.id)) return false;
+    if (thread.isResolved) return false;
+    const comments = thread.comments.nodes.filter((c) => c !== null);
+    if (comments.length === 0) return false;
+    if (comments.some((c) => isPullfrog(c.author?.login))) return false;
+    return input2.addressScope === "all" || comments.some((c) => mentionsPullfrog(c.body));
+  });
+}
+function mentionsPullfrog(body) {
+  if (!body) return false;
+  return body.split(/\r?\n/).filter((line) => !line.trim().startsWith(">")).join("\n").toLowerCase().includes("@pullfrog");
 }
 function formatReviewData(input2) {
   const rawReviewBody = input2.review.body;
@@ -197033,6 +197055,7 @@ function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx) {
     parameters: GetReviewComments,
     execute: execute(async (params) => {
       const approvedBy = ctx.payload.event.trigger === "fix_review" && ctx.payload.event.approved_only ? ctx.payload.triggerer : void 0;
+      if (params.fresh) invalidateReviewThreadCache(ctx.repo);
       const result = await getReviewData({
         octokit: ctx.octokit,
         owner: ctx.repo.owner,
@@ -197040,6 +197063,7 @@ function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx) {
         pullNumber: params.pull_number,
         reviewId: params.review_id,
         approvedBy,
+        addressScope: ctx.payload.event.address_scope,
         tmpdir: ctx.tmpdir,
         githubToken: ctx.githubInstallationToken
       });
@@ -197070,7 +197094,7 @@ function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx) {
         threadCount: threadBlocks.length,
         commentsPath,
         toc: formatted.toc,
-        instructions: `the file at commentsPath contains ${threadBlocks.length} review threads with full conversation history. comments marked with * are from the target review (${params.review_id}). the TOC shows each thread's file:line and the line number where it appears in the file. to read a specific thread, use: grep -A 50 "^## <file:line>" ${commentsPath} (replace <file:line> with the path from the TOC, e.g. "^## action/utils/foo.ts:42"). address each thread in order, working through one file at a time.`
+        instructions: `the file at commentsPath contains ${threadBlocks.length} review threads with full conversation history. comments marked with * are from the target review (${params.review_id}); any other thread is open feedback on this PR that is also yours to address, including comments that landed after this run started. the TOC shows each thread's file:line and the line number where it appears in the file. to read a specific thread, use: grep -A 50 "^## <file:line>" ${commentsPath} (replace <file:line> with the path from the TOC, e.g. "^## action/utils/foo.ts:42"). address each thread in order, working through one file at a time.`
       };
     })
   });

package/dist/internal.js

@@ -579,10 +579,9 @@ var providers = {
       // was the catalog's only GLM route, and Grok had no Zen route at all.
       glm: {
         displayName: "GLM",
-        resolve: "opencode/glm-5.2",
-        effort: ["high", "max"],
-        openRouterEffort: ["high", "xhigh"],
-        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2"
+        resolve: "opencode/glm-5.3",
+        effort: ["low", "high", "max"],
+        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.3"
       },
       grok: {
         displayName: "Grok",
@@ -629,10 +628,11 @@ var providers = {
   // OpenCode Go is a separate $10/mo subscription from Zen, served on its own
   // base URL (`https://opencode.ai/zen/go/v1`) but authenticated with the SAME
   // `OPENCODE_API_KEY`. it carries the open-weight coding models plus a couple
-  // of frontier ones, and 14 of the ids below are served ONLY here — Zen's
-  // `/v1/models` does not list glm-5.3*, qwen3.7/3.8-*, mimo-*, longcat-2.0,
-  // hy3 or muse-spark. so for a Go subscriber this provider is not a duplicate
-  // route to Zen, it is the only route to most of what they pay for.
+  // of frontier ones, six of which are served ONLY here — Zen's `/v1/models`
+  // does not list qwen3.7/3.8-*, mimo-v2.5-pro, longcat-2.0 or hy3. (it listed
+  // no glm-5.3* either until 2026-09, which is why `opencode/glm` trailed on
+  // 5.2.) so for a Go subscriber this provider is not a duplicate route to Zen,
+  // it is the only route to a large part of what they pay for.
   // like `opencode` and `openrouter` this is a ROUTER, not a vendor: slugs and
   // display names mirror the upstream brand tier, and the picker groups them
   // under the upstream vendor.
@@ -701,7 +701,9 @@ var providers = {
         // `high` the Go route does not.
         effort: ["low", "medium", "xhigh"],
         openRouterEffort: ["minimal", "low", "medium", "high", "xhigh"],
-        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/qwen/qwen3.8-max"
+        // OpenRouter retired the rolling `qwen3.8-max` for a dated snapshot, so
+        // this side has to pin one; the Go route still carries the rolling id.
+        openRouterResolve: "openrouter/qwen/qwen3.8-max-0902"
       },
       "qwen-plus": {
         displayName: "Qwen Plus",
@@ -1383,6 +1385,7 @@ For simple, well-defined tasks, skip the plan phase and go straight to build.`
    - record what was done (or why nothing was done)
 
 5. Quality check:
+   - re-call \`${t("get_review_comments")}\` with \`fresh: true\` before committing: reviewers keep commenting while you work, and any thread it now returns that you have not addressed is in scope for this run.
    - test changes, then review the diff before committing \u2014 verify only intended changes are present, no debug artifacts remain, no fix turned out to be bloat in context (revert any that did), and the changes are clean enough that a senior engineer would approve without hesitation
    - ${commitStep}
 
@@ -1392,7 +1395,7 @@ For simple, well-defined tasks, skip the plan phase and go straight to build.`
    - **once the fix is live on the remote**, for each thread you acted on:
      - reply ONCE via \`${t("reply_to_review_comment")}\`. The \`comment_id\` parameter takes the root comment's numeric \`id=\` (from the first \`comment author=...\` tag in the \`${t("get_review_comments")}\` output) \u2014 NOT the \`thread=\` value; that's a separate GraphQL ID used by resolve. The runtime dedupes identical bodies within a session.
      - **immediately** call \`${t("resolve_review_thread")}\` with that thread's \`thread=\` value as \`thread_id\`. Resolve every thread where you (a) made the requested code change in full \u2014 partial fixes leave the thread open \u2014 OR (b) replied with a substantive answer the user explicitly asked for. Do NOT resolve threads where you pushed back on the request and the disagreement is unresolved; leave those open for the human to mediate.
-   - call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with a brief summary`
+   - call \`${t("report_progress")}\` with a brief summary. If your last \`${t("get_review_comments")}\` turned up threads you did not address, name them there \u2014 a review arriving this late is suppressed as a duplicate and nothing else will pick it up.`
     },
     // Review and IncrementalReview route the minimum reviewfrog specialists
     // needed to cover unresolved, disposition-changing hypotheses. Most runs

package/dist/mcp/reviewComments.d.ts

@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ export declare function parseFilePatches(patch: string): ParsedHunk[];
 export declare const GetReviewComments: import("arktype/internal/variants/object.ts").ObjectType<{
     pull_number: number;
     review_id: number;
+    fresh?: boolean;
 }, {}>;
 /**
  * formats thread blocks into markdown with TOC and line numbers.
@@ -94,6 +95,37 @@ export declare function buildThreadBlocks(threads: ReviewThread[], filePatchMap:
     lineRange: string;
     content: string[];
 }[];
+/**
+ * Open threads on the PR that this run should also address, beyond the review
+ * that dispatched it.
+ *
+ * A reviewer working through a PR emits one `pull_request_review_submitted` per
+ * submission, so a second review lands seconds after the first — and until this
+ * existed, the run already working on the PR could never see it: the filter
+ * above keeps only threads carrying a comment from the *dispatched* `reviewId`,
+ * so a new comment on a different line was invisible no matter how often the
+ * agent re-read. That is what made the in-flight cap in `handleWebhook.ts` a
+ * silent loss rather than the coalescing it was documented as (#1103).
+ *
+ * `fetchAllReviewThreads` already pulls every thread on the PR and caches it for
+ * 60s, so this costs no extra round trip and a re-read mid-run picks up whatever
+ * landed behind the run.
+ *
+ * Three exclusions, each load-bearing:
+ *   - resolved threads are done, and re-opening that conversation is noise.
+ *   - a thread Pullfrog has already spoken in was handled by an earlier run.
+ *     That deliberately includes the pushbacks AddressReviews leaves open for a
+ *     human to mediate — re-addressing one re-litigates a settled disagreement —
+ *     and it is also what stops this mode replying to Pullfrog's own reviews.
+ *   - under `mentions` a concurrent thread is in scope only if it actually asked
+ *     for Pullfrog. Deliberately asymmetric with `threadsForReview`, which is
+ *     returned whole and always was: the dispatching review is the one the
+ *     server already adjudicated, and the agent needs its unmentioned threads as
+ *     context for the comment that did mention it. Which of those to ACT on stays
+ *     the mode prompt's job. A concurrent review has had no such adjudication, so
+ *     the mention is the only thing that can authorize it.
+ */
+export declare function concurrentThreads(allThreads: (ReviewThread | null)[], threadsForReview: ReviewThread[], input: GetReviewDataInput): ReviewThread[];
 interface GetReviewDataInput {
     octokit: Octokit;
     owner: string;
@@ -101,6 +133,14 @@ interface GetReviewDataInput {
     pullNumber: number;
     reviewId: number;
     approvedBy?: string | undefined;
+    /**
+     * Widen the read past the dispatching review to the other open threads on the
+     * PR — `all` on a Pullfrog-authored PR, `mentions` when only `@pullfrog`-
+     * mentioning threads are in scope. Absent (console `fix_review`, and any
+     * payload from a server build that predates the field) keeps the read scoped
+     * to the dispatching review exactly as before.
+     */
+    addressScope?: "all" | "mentions" | undefined;
     tmpdir: string;
     githubToken: string;
 }
@@ -148,9 +188,11 @@ export declare function getReviewData(input: GetReviewDataInput): Promise<{
 export declare function GetReviewCommentsTool(ctx: ToolContext): import("fastmcp").Tool<any, import("@standard-schema/spec").StandardSchemaV1<{
     pull_number: number;
     review_id: number;
+    fresh?: boolean;
 }, {
     pull_number: number;
     review_id: number;
+    fresh?: boolean;
 }>> & {
     mutates?: boolean;
 };

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "pullfrog",
-  "version": "0.1.68",
+  "version": "0.1.69",
   "type": "module",
   "bin": {
     "pullfrog": "dist/cli.mjs",