promptwheel 0.7.14 → 0.7.16

package/README.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 ![PromptWheel catching an agent game the metric, then passing an honest fix](demo/promptwheel.gif)
 
-## Catch your agent cheating, in 60 seconds
+## See it in 60 seconds
 
 A hand-built cheat, so you can watch the mechanism fire (illustrative, not evidence):
 

package/bin/promptwheel.mjs

@@ -1271,13 +1271,13 @@ function renderMarkdown(r) {
     '',
     `\`${r.base} → ${r.head}\` · ${r.mode} mode${r.repeat > 1 ? ` · ×${r.repeat}` : ''}`,
     '',
-    ...(r.mandates ? [r.mandates.map((md) => `> ⛔ **Mandate violated:** \`${md.name}\`${md.reason ? ': ' + md.reason : ''} (touched \`${md.files.join('`, `')}\`)${md.removed ? ' (deleted in this same change; it stays in force for the change that removes it)' : md.edited ? ' (edited in this same change; the version before the change stays in force for the change that edits it)' : ''}`).join('\n'), ''] : []),
+    ...(r.mandates ? [r.mandates.map((md) => `> ⛔ **Protected path touched:** \`${md.name}\`${md.reason ? ': ' + md.reason : ''} (touched \`${md.files.join('`, `')}\`)${md.removed ? ' (deleted in this same change; it stays in force for the change that removes it)' : md.edited ? ' (edited in this same change; the version before the change stays in force for the change that edits it)' : ''}`).join('\n'), ''] : []),
     ...(r.explained ? [...r.explained.map((x) => `> ${x.noted ? 'ℹ️ **Note:**' : '✋ **Needs a look:**'} ${x.what}${x.items ? ': `' + x.items.join('`, `') + '`' : ''}`), ...(r.explained.some((x) => !x.noted && x.allowable) ? ['>', '> To accept this, comment `sawbuck-allow: <your reason>` on this PR and re-run the check.'] : []), ''] : []),
     '| metric | before | after | Δ | status | confidence |',
     '|---|--:|--:|--:|---|---|',
     rows,
     '',
-    r.verdict === 'gamed' ? '> 🚩 A metric "improved" only because the agent edited tests/config/grader, not the source. The win does not survive a source-only re-run.' : r.verdict === 'fail' ? (r.mandates ? '> ⛔ A mandate was violated: a protected path changed. This is a hard rule, enforced before any metric.' : '> ❌ A 🛡️ guarded metric regressed beyond the noise band.') : r.verdict === 'inconclusive' ? '> 🟡 A 🛡️ guarded check is **inert**, it never runs, so nothing was actually verified. Fix its command before trusting a pass.' : '> ✅ No guarded metric regressed.',
+    r.verdict === 'gamed' ? '> 🚩 A metric "improved" only because the agent edited tests/config/grader, not the source. The win does not survive a source-only re-run.' : r.verdict === 'fail' ? (r.mandates ? '> ⛔ A protected path changed. This is a hard rule, enforced before any metric.' : '> ❌ A 🛡️ guarded metric regressed beyond the noise band.') : r.verdict === 'inconclusive' ? '> 🟡 A 🛡️ guarded check is **inert**, it never runs, so nothing was actually verified. Fix its command before trusting a pass.' : '> ✅ No guarded metric regressed.',
     ...(r.gate && r.gate.weakened ? ['', `> 🚩 **Gate weakened:** ${r.gate.weakened.map((w) => `\`${w.name}\` ${w.change === 'guard-removed' ? 'removed' : 'disabled'} (would have ${w.status} at head)`).join('; ')}. The pass was bought by dropping a guard, not by earning it.`] : []),
     ...(r.gate && r.gate.changed ? ['', `> ⚠ **Gate definition changed** in this diff (fingerprint \`${r.gate.fingerprint.base}\` -> \`${r.gate.fingerprint.head}\`): a metric, guard, evaluatorPath or mandate was added, removed or edited. Review the config change with the code.`] : []),
     '',

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "promptwheel",
-  "version": "0.7.14",
+  "version": "0.7.16",
   "description": "A deterministic, zero-LLM check for your coding loop. A win must survive a re-run from the agent's source edits alone, so a test that went green by editing the test reads GAMED. Runs in CI or a Claude Code plugin.",
   "type": "module",
   "bin": {