prizmkit 1.1.15 → 1.1.17

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
1
1
  {
2
- "frameworkVersion": "1.1.15",
3
- "bundledAt": "2026-04-09T16:41:49.608Z",
4
- "bundledFrom": "aed6378"
2
+ "frameworkVersion": "1.1.17",
3
+ "bundledAt": "2026-04-10T11:02:04.397Z",
4
+ "bundledFrom": "07af4ce"
5
5
  }
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
1
1
  {
2
- "version": "1.1.15",
2
+ "version": "1.1.17",
3
3
  "skills": {
4
4
  "prizm-kit": {
5
5
  "description": "Full-lifecycle dev toolkit. Covers spec-driven development, Prizm context docs, code quality, debugging, deployment, and knowledge management.",
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Plan an application from idea to actionable project context through interactive
12
12
  - Architecture decision capture
13
13
  - Project brief accumulation (`.prizmkit/plans/project-brief.md`)
14
14
 
15
- This skill captures **what to build and why**. For **feature decomposition and `.prizmkit/plans/feature-list.json` generation**, hand off to `feature-planner`.
15
+ This skill captures **project-level context only**: vision, tech stack, conventions, architecture decisions, and project brief. It does NOT do feature decomposition or generate `feature-list.json` that is `feature-planner`'s job.
16
16
 
17
17
  For adding features to an **existing** project that already has a project brief, use `feature-planner` directly.
18
18
 
@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ If you believe the task is better suited for a different workflow, you MUST:
38
38
  2. Project conventions and architecture decisions appended to `CLAUDE.md` / `CODEBUDDY.md` (with user consent)
39
39
 
40
40
  **After planning is complete**, you MUST:
41
- 1. Present the summary of captured vision, constraints, and decisions
42
- 2. **Ask the user explicitly** whether they want to proceed to feature decomposition
43
- 3. If the user wants to continue exploring → stay in app-planner
44
- 4. **NEVER auto-execute** the pipeline, feature-planner, or any implementation step
41
+ 1. Present the summary of captured project-level context (vision, conventions, architecture decisions, project brief)
42
+ 2. List the artifacts produced and suggest possible next steps (e.g., `feature-planner`, `prizmkit-plan`, etc.) — but do NOT auto-invoke any of them
43
+ 3. **NEVER auto-execute** the pipeline, feature-planner, or any implementation step
44
+ 4. **NEVER generate `feature-list.json`** that is exclusively `feature-planner`'s responsibility
45
45
 
46
46
  ## When to Use
47
47
 
@@ -154,7 +154,6 @@ This applies to:
154
154
  - Project conventions
155
155
  - Tech stack selection
156
156
  - Architecture decisions
157
- - Handoff recommendations
158
157
  - Session exit gates
159
158
  - Brownfield prerequisite check
160
159
  - Any other decision point
@@ -165,6 +164,11 @@ This applies to:
165
164
  - Use `multiSelect: true` when the user can pick more than one
166
165
  - Mark the recommended option first and append "(Recommended)" to its label
167
166
  - Use the `description` field to explain trade-offs or implications
167
+ - **Every non-essential question MUST include a "Skip" option** (e.g., "Skip — decide later"). Users should never be forced to answer something they want to defer. Skipped items are simply not written to conventions — they can be added in a future session.
168
+
169
+ **What can be skipped vs. what cannot:**
170
+ - **Cannot skip**: Intent confirmation (must know the session goal)
171
+ - **Everything else can be skipped**: conventions, tech stack choices, architecture decisions, design direction, etc. If the user skips, move on — do not re-ask or block progress.
168
172
 
169
173
  **When gathering open-ended information** (e.g., "describe your app idea"), use regular text questions — but follow up with `AskUserQuestion`-based clarifications wherever possible.
170
174
 
@@ -184,7 +188,7 @@ Route by answer:
184
188
  - Load `${SKILL_DIR}/references/brainstorm-guide.md` and follow its structured ideation process (Phases A-D)
185
189
  - Brainstorm Phase D output serves as the Vision Summary (CP-AP-2)
186
190
  - After brainstorm completes, use `AskUserQuestion`: "Ideas are taking shape. What's next?"
187
- - **Proceed to feature decomposition (Recommended)** — hand off to feature-planner
191
+ - **Continue to project planning (Recommended)** — capture tech stack, conventions, and architecture decisions
188
192
  - **Continue refining** — keep brainstorming
189
193
  - **Save draft & exit** — save progress to .prizmkit/planning/
190
194
  - **Checkpoints in explore mode**: CP-AP-0 (required), CP-AP-1 (required), CP-AP-2 (from brainstorm output), CP-AP-3 (only if user proceeds to Phase 2), CP-AP-4 and CP-AP-5 (only if user transitions to produce mode)
@@ -300,7 +304,7 @@ Execute the planning workflow in conversation mode with mandatory checkpoints:
300
304
  - Question: "No UI/UX design docs found. Would you like to establish design direction?"
301
305
  - Options: "Establish design direction now (Recommended)", "Skip for now", "I have external designs"
302
306
  3. Capture architecture decisions and finalize project brief
303
- 4. Hand off to `feature-planner` for feature decomposition
307
+ 4. Present completion summary with artifacts produced and possible next steps
304
308
 
305
309
  ### Checkpoints (Mandatory Gates)
306
310
 
@@ -313,7 +317,7 @@ Checkpoints catch cascading errors early — skipping one means the next phase b
313
317
  | **CP-AP-2** | Vision Summary | Goal/users/differentiators confirmed by user. For brownfield: existing purpose confirmed or refined. | 1-2 |
314
318
  | **CP-AP-3** | Frontend Design Evaluated | For frontend projects: checked for existing UI/UX design system; user was asked if missing. **Auto-pass** for backend-only or non-UI projects. | 2 |
315
319
  | **CP-AP-4** | Project Brief Accumulated | `.prizmkit/plans/project-brief.md` exists at `.prizmkit/plans/` with at least 3 ideas listed. For brownfield: already-implemented items marked `[x]` count toward this total. | 3 |
316
- | **CP-AP-5** | Handoff Ready | All app-level context captured; user confirmed readiness for feature decomposition | 4 |
320
+ | **CP-AP-5** | Planning Complete | All project-level context captured: conventions, tech stack, architecture decisions, project brief finalized | 4 |
317
321
 
318
322
  ## Architecture Decision Capture
319
323
 
@@ -321,7 +325,7 @@ After Phase 2, if framework-shaping architecture decisions emerged during planni
321
325
 
322
326
  **How it works**:
323
327
  1. If decisions are captured → append to `CLAUDE.md` / `CODEBUDDY.md` under `### Architecture Decisions` section
324
- 2. Feature-planner and other downstream skills read `CLAUDE.md` / `CODEBUDDY.md` as standard context, so they automatically receive these decisions
328
+ 2. Downstream skills (feature-planner, prizmkit-plan, etc.) read `CLAUDE.md` / `CODEBUDDY.md` as standard context, so they automatically receive these decisions
325
329
  3. Do NOT write directly to `.prizm-docs/root.prizm` — that file is maintained by `prizmkit-prizm-docs` and `prizmkit-retrospective`. If the project needs `.prizm-docs/`, recommend the user run `prizmkit-prizm-docs` init after planning.
326
330
 
327
331
  ## Project Brief Accumulation
@@ -349,13 +353,20 @@ When the session appears to be ending:
349
353
  - **Save draft & exit** — write current progress as draft to `.prizmkit/planning/`
350
354
  - **Abandon** — exit without saving
351
355
 
352
- ## Handoff to feature-planner
356
+ ## Completion Summary
357
+
358
+ After all checkpoints pass, present a summary and end the session:
359
+
360
+ 1. **Summary** (as text): List all project-level artifacts produced:
361
+ - Project conventions → `CLAUDE.md` / `CODEBUDDY.md` `### Project Conventions`
362
+ - Tech stack → `.prizmkit/config.json`
363
+ - Architecture decisions (if any) → `CLAUDE.md` / `CODEBUDDY.md` `### Architecture Decisions`
364
+ - Project brief → `.prizmkit/plans/project-brief.md`
353
365
 
354
- After all checkpoints pass, present a summary and use `AskUserQuestion` for next steps:
366
+ 2. **Suggest possible next steps** (as text, NOT auto-invoked):
367
+ > Project-level planning is complete. When you're ready, here are some possible next steps:
368
+ > - `feature-planner` — decompose the project into features and generate `feature-list.json`
369
+ > - `prizmkit-plan` — start working on a specific feature directly
370
+ > - `prizmkit-prizm-docs` — initialize or update project documentation
355
371
 
356
- 1. **Summary** (as text): List captured vision, tech stack, constraints, architecture decisions, and project brief status
357
- 2. Use `AskUserQuestion`: "Planning complete! What's next?"
358
- - **Proceed to feature decomposition (Recommended)** — invoke `feature-planner` to break down features into `.prizmkit/plans/feature-list.json`
359
- - **Continue refining** — stay in app-planner to adjust vision or constraints
360
- - **Done for now** — exit with artifacts saved
361
- 3. **Artifacts produced**: List files written (`.prizmkit/plans/project-brief.md`, project conventions and architecture decisions in `CLAUDE.md` / `CODEBUDDY.md`)
372
+ **Do NOT invoke any of these.** The user decides what to do next, in their own time.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "prizmkit",
3
- "version": "1.1.15",
3
+ "version": "1.1.17",
4
4
  "description": "Create a new PrizmKit-powered project with clean initialization — no framework dev files, just what you need.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "bin": {