principles-disciple 1.72.0 → 1.74.0

package/tests/core/nocturnal-trinity.test.ts

@@ -1,2053 +0,0 @@
-import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
-import {
-  runTrinity,
-  runTrinityAsync,
-  validateDraftArtifact,
-  draftToArtifact,
-  DEFAULT_TRINITY_CONFIG,
-  OpenClawTrinityRuntimeAdapter,
-  TrinityRuntimeContractError,
-  NOCTURNAL_DREAMER_PROMPT,
-  NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT,
-  formatReasoningContext,
-  invokeStubDreamer,
-  invokeStubPhilosopher,
-  validateExtraction,
-  type TrinityConfig,
-  type DreamerOutput,
-  type DreamerCandidate,
-  type PhilosopherOutput,
-  type PhilosopherJudgment,
-  type TrinityDraftArtifact,
-  type TrinityRuntimeAdapter,
-  type TrinityTelemetry,
-  type RejectedAnalysis,
-  type ChosenJustification,
-  type ContrastiveAnalysis,
-} from '../../src/core/nocturnal-trinity.js';
-import {
-  validateDreamerOutput,
-  validatePhilosopherOutput,
-  validateTrinityDraft,
-} from '../../src/core/nocturnal-arbiter.js';
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Test Fixtures
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-function makeSnapshot(overrides: Partial<{
-  failureCount: number;
-  totalPainEvents: number;
-  totalGateBlocks: number;
-}> = {}) {
-  return {
-    sessionId: 'session-test-123',
-    startedAt: '2026-04-12T00:00:00.000Z',
-    updatedAt: '2026-04-12T00:05:00.000Z',
-    assistantTurns: [],
-    userTurns: [],
-    toolCalls: [],
-    painEvents: [],
-    gateBlocks: [],
-    stats: {
-      failureCount: overrides.failureCount ?? 0,
-      totalPainEvents: overrides.totalPainEvents ?? 0,
-      totalGateBlocks: overrides.totalGateBlocks ?? 0,
-      totalAssistantTurns: 5,
-      totalToolCalls: 10,
-    },
-  };
-}
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: validateDreamerOutput
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('validateDreamerOutput', () => {
-  it('passes a valid Dreamer output with candidates', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-          betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-          rationale: 'Because the principle says so',
-          confidence: 0.9,
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.failures).toHaveLength(0);
-  });
-
-  it('passes a valid Dreamer output with multiple candidates', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-          betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-          rationale: 'Because the principle says so',
-          confidence: 0.9,
-        },
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 1,
-          badDecision: 'Did another wrong thing',
-          betterDecision: 'Do it differently',
-          rationale: 'Alternative approach is better',
-          confidence: 0.8,
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.failures).toHaveLength(0);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Dreamer output marked invalid', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: false,
-      candidates: [],
-      reason: 'No signal found',
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('marked invalid'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Dreamer output marked invalid without reason', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: false,
-      candidates: [],
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Dreamer output without candidates array', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('candidates array'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Dreamer candidate missing required fields', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Has badDecision but missing betterDecision',
-          // missing: betterDecision, rationale, confidence
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('betterDecision'))).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('rationale'))).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('confidence'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Dreamer candidate with invalid confidence (out of range)', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Wrong',
-          betterDecision: 'Right',
-          rationale: 'Because',
-          confidence: 1.5, // out of range
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('confidence'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Dreamer candidate with duplicate candidateIndex', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Wrong 1',
-          betterDecision: 'Right 1',
-          rationale: 'Because 1',
-          confidence: 0.9,
-        },
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0, // duplicate
-          badDecision: 'Wrong 2',
-          betterDecision: 'Right 2',
-          rationale: 'Because 2',
-          confidence: 0.8,
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('duplicate'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Dreamer candidate with identical badDecision and betterDecision', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Do the same thing',
-          betterDecision: 'Do the same thing', // identical
-          rationale: 'Because it is correct',
-          confidence: 0.9,
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('identical'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Dreamer output missing generatedAt', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Wrong',
-          betterDecision: 'Right',
-          rationale: 'Because',
-          confidence: 0.9,
-        },
-      ],
-      // missing generatedAt
-    };
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('generatedAt'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects non-object input', () => {
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput(null);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects string input', () => {
-    const result = validateDreamerOutput('not an object');
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-  });
-});
-
-describe('OpenClawTrinityRuntimeAdapter contract hardening', () => {
-  function makeRuntimeApi(overrides: Partial<any> = {}) {
-    return {
-      runtime: {
-        agent: {
-          runEmbeddedPiAgent: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
-            payloads: [
-              { text: '{"valid":true,"candidates":[],"generatedAt":"2026-04-12T00:00:00.000Z"}' },
-            ],
-          }),
-        },
-        config: {
-          loadConfig: vi.fn().mockReturnValue({
-            agents: {
-              defaults: {
-                model: 'openai/gpt-5.4',
-              },
-            },
-          }),
-        },
-        ...overrides.runtime,
-      },
-      logger: {
-        info: vi.fn(),
-        warn: vi.fn(),
-        error: vi.fn(),
-      },
-    };
-  }
-
-  it('rejects missing runtime.agent.runEmbeddedPiAgent contract explicitly', () => {
-    expect(() => new OpenClawTrinityRuntimeAdapter({ runtime: {} } as any)).toThrow(TrinityRuntimeContractError);
-    expect(() => new OpenClawTrinityRuntimeAdapter({ runtime: {} } as any)).toThrow(/runtime_unavailable/);
-  });
-
-  it('passes explicit provider/model overrides into runtime.agent.runEmbeddedPiAgent', async () => {
-    const api = makeRuntimeApi();
-    const adapter = new OpenClawTrinityRuntimeAdapter(api as any);
-
-    await adapter.invokeDreamer(makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 1 }) as any, 'T-08', 2);
-
-    expect(api.runtime.agent.runEmbeddedPiAgent).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
-      expect.objectContaining({
-        provider: 'openai',
-        model: 'gpt-5.4',
-      }),
-    );
-  });
-
-  it('returns stable failure classes when runtime invocation fails', async () => {
-    const api = makeRuntimeApi({
-      runtime: {
-        agent: {
-          runEmbeddedPiAgent: vi.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('gateway unavailable')),
-        },
-      },
-    });
-    const adapter = new OpenClawTrinityRuntimeAdapter(api as any);
-
-    const result = await adapter.invokeDreamer(makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 1 }) as any, 'T-08', 2);
-
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.reason).toContain('runtime_run_failed');
-    expect(adapter.getLastFailureReason()).toContain('runtime_run_failed');
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: validatePhilosopherOutput
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('validatePhilosopherOutput', () => {
-  it('passes a valid Philosopher output', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      judgments: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          critique: 'Strong alignment',
-          principleAligned: true,
-          score: 0.92,
-          rank: 1,
-        },
-      ],
-      overallAssessment: 'Good candidate set',
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validatePhilosopherOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.failures).toHaveLength(0);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Philosopher output marked invalid', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: false,
-      judgments: [],
-      reason: 'No candidates to judge',
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validatePhilosopherOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Philosopher output without judgments array', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      overallAssessment: 'Good',
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validatePhilosopherOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('judgments array'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Philosopher judgment missing required fields', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      judgments: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          // missing: critique, principleAligned, score, rank
-        },
-      ],
-      overallAssessment: 'Good',
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validatePhilosopherOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Philosopher judgment with invalid score (out of range)', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      judgments: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          critique: 'Good',
-          principleAligned: true,
-          score: 1.5, // out of range
-          rank: 1,
-        },
-      ],
-      overallAssessment: 'Good',
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validatePhilosopherOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('score'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Philosopher judgment with invalid rank (must be >= 1)', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      judgments: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          critique: 'Good',
-          principleAligned: true,
-          score: 0.9,
-          rank: 0, // invalid
-        },
-      ],
-      overallAssessment: 'Good',
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validatePhilosopherOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('rank'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Philosopher output with non-sequential ranks', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      judgments: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          critique: 'Good',
-          principleAligned: true,
-          score: 0.9,
-          rank: 1,
-        },
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 1,
-          critique: 'Also good',
-          principleAligned: true,
-          score: 0.8,
-          rank: 3, // should be 2
-        },
-      ],
-      overallAssessment: 'Good',
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validatePhilosopherOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('sequential ranks'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects Philosopher output missing overallAssessment', () => {
-    const output = {
-      valid: true,
-      judgments: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          critique: 'Good',
-          principleAligned: true,
-          score: 0.9,
-          rank: 1,
-        },
-      ],
-      // missing overallAssessment
-      generatedAt: '2026-03-27T12:00:00.000Z',
-    };
-    const result = validatePhilosopherOutput(output);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('overallAssessment'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: validateTrinityDraft
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('validateTrinityDraft', () => {
-  function makeValidDraft(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}): Record<string, unknown> {
-    return {
-      selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-      badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-      betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-      rationale: 'Because the principle says so and this is the right approach',
-      sessionId: 'session-test-123',
-      principleId: 'T-01',
-      sourceSnapshotRef: 'snapshot-test-001',
-      telemetry: {
-        chainMode: 'trinity',
-        dreamerPassed: true,
-        philosopherPassed: true,
-        scribePassed: true,
-        candidateCount: 3,
-        selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-        stageFailures: [],
-      },
-      ...overrides,
-    };
-  }
-
-  it('passes a valid Trinity draft artifact', () => {
-    const draft = makeValidDraft();
-    const result = validateTrinityDraft(draft);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.failures).toHaveLength(0);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects draft with missing badDecision', () => {
-    const draft = makeValidDraft();
-    delete draft.badDecision;
-    const result = validateTrinityDraft(draft);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('badDecision'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects draft with empty badDecision', () => {
-    const draft = makeValidDraft({ badDecision: '   ' });
-    const result = validateTrinityDraft(draft);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('badDecision'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects draft with short rationale (< 20 chars)', () => {
-    const draft = makeValidDraft({ rationale: 'Too short' });
-    const result = validateTrinityDraft(draft);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('rationale'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects draft with identical badDecision and betterDecision', () => {
-    const draft = makeValidDraft({
-      badDecision: 'Same thing',
-      betterDecision: 'Same thing',
-    });
-    const result = validateTrinityDraft(draft);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('identical'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects draft with invalid telemetry', () => {
-    const draft = makeValidDraft({ telemetry: null });
-    const result = validateTrinityDraft(draft);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('telemetry'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects draft with invalid chainMode in telemetry', () => {
-    const draft = makeValidDraft({
-      telemetry: {
-        chainMode: 'invalid-mode', // must be 'trinity' or 'single-reflector'
-        dreamerPassed: true,
-        philosopherPassed: true,
-        scribePassed: true,
-        candidateCount: 3,
-        selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-        stageFailures: [],
-      },
-    });
-    const result = validateTrinityDraft(draft);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('chainMode'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: runTrinity — successful path
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('runTrinity', () => {
-  it('produces a successful Trinity result with valid snapshot (failure signal)', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true, // Use stub implementations
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.artifact).toBeDefined();
-    expect(result.telemetry.chainMode).toBe('trinity');
-    expect(result.telemetry.dreamerPassed).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.philosopherPassed).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.scribePassed).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.candidateCount).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    expect(result.telemetry.selectedCandidateIndex).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
-    expect(result.failures).toHaveLength(0);
-    expect(result.fallbackOccurred).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('produces a successful Trinity result with pain signal', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ totalPainEvents: 3 });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true,
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.artifact).toBeDefined();
-  });
-
-  it('produces a successful Trinity result with gate block signal', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ totalGateBlocks: 1 });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true,
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-03', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.artifact).toBeDefined();
-  });
-
-  it('respects maxCandidates config', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 5 });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 2,
-      useStubs: true,
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.candidateCount).toBeLessThanOrEqual(2);
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: runTrinity — failure paths
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('runTrinity — failure paths', () => {
-  it('fails when snapshot has no signal and generates no candidates', () => {
-    // Snapshot with all zero stats - stub will fail to generate candidates
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({
-      failureCount: 0,
-      totalPainEvents: 0,
-      totalGateBlocks: 0,
-    });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true,
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    expect(result.failures[0].stage).toBe('dreamer');
-    expect(result.telemetry.dreamerPassed).toBe(false);
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: validateDraftArtifact
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('validateDraftArtifact', () => {
-  function makeValidArtifact(): TrinityDraftArtifact {
-    return {
-      selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-      badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-      betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-      rationale: 'Because the principle says so and this is the correct approach',
-      sessionId: 'session-test-123',
-      principleId: 'T-01',
-      sourceSnapshotRef: 'snapshot-test-001',
-      telemetry: {
-        chainMode: 'trinity',
-        dreamerPassed: true,
-        philosopherPassed: true,
-        scribePassed: true,
-        candidateCount: 3,
-        selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-        stageFailures: [],
-      },
-    };
-  }
-
-  it('passes a valid TrinityDraftArtifact', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact();
-    const result = validateDraftArtifact(artifact);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.failures).toHaveLength(0);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects artifact with missing badDecision', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact();
-    delete (artifact as Record<string, unknown>).badDecision;
-    const result = validateDraftArtifact(artifact);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects artifact with empty betterDecision', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact();
-    artifact.betterDecision = '   ';
-    const result = validateDraftArtifact(artifact);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects artifact with short rationale', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact();
-    artifact.rationale = 'Too short';
-    const result = validateDraftArtifact(artifact);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('rejects artifact with identical badDecision and betterDecision', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact();
-    artifact.badDecision = 'Same';
-    artifact.betterDecision = 'Same';
-    const result = validateDraftArtifact(artifact);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.includes('identical'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: draftToArtifact
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('draftToArtifact', () => {
-  it('converts TrinityDraftArtifact to NocturnalArtifact-compatible structure', () => {
-    const draft: TrinityDraftArtifact = {
-      selectedCandidateIndex: 1,
-      badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-      betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-      rationale: 'Because the principle says so',
-      sessionId: 'session-test-123',
-      principleId: 'T-01',
-      sourceSnapshotRef: 'snapshot-test-001',
-      telemetry: {
-        chainMode: 'trinity',
-        dreamerPassed: true,
-        philosopherPassed: true,
-        scribePassed: true,
-        candidateCount: 3,
-        selectedCandidateIndex: 1,
-        stageFailures: [],
-      },
-    };
-
-    const artifact = draftToArtifact(draft);
-
-    expect(artifact.artifactId).toBeDefined(); // Generated UUID
-    expect(artifact.sessionId).toBe('session-test-123');
-    expect(artifact.principleId).toBe('T-01');
-    expect(artifact.badDecision).toBe('Did something wrong');
-    expect(artifact.betterDecision).toBe('Do it right');
-    expect(artifact.rationale).toBe('Because the principle says so');
-    expect(artifact.sourceSnapshotRef).toBe('snapshot-test-001');
-    expect(artifact.createdAt).toBeDefined(); // Current timestamp
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: DEFAULT_TRINITY_CONFIG
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('DEFAULT_TRINITY_CONFIG', () => {
-  it('has sensible defaults', () => {
-    expect(DEFAULT_TRINITY_CONFIG.useTrinity).toBe(true);
-    expect(DEFAULT_TRINITY_CONFIG.maxCandidates).toBe(3);
-    expect(DEFAULT_TRINITY_CONFIG.useStubs).toBe(false);  // real subagent execution is now the default
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: runTrinity — useStubs=false without adapter (sync failure)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('runTrinity — useStubs=false without adapter', () => {
-  it('fails with clear error when useStubs=false but no runtimeAdapter provided', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: false,  // No adapter provided!
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    expect(result.failures[0].stage).toBe('dreamer');
-    expect(result.failures[0].reason).toContain('runtimeAdapter');
-    expect(result.telemetry.usedStubs).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.telemetry.dreamerPassed).toBe(false);
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: runTrinityAsync — with mock runtime adapter
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('runTrinityAsync — with mock runtime adapter', () => {
-  function makeMockAdapter(overrides: Partial<{
-    dreamerOutput: DreamerOutput;
-    philosopherOutput: PhilosopherOutput;
-    scribeArtifact: TrinityDraftArtifact | null;
-    closeCalled: boolean;
-  }> = {}): TrinityRuntimeAdapter & { closeCalled: boolean } {
-    const defaultDreamerOutput: DreamerOutput = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-          betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-          rationale: 'Because the principle says so',
-          confidence: 0.9,
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
-    };
-
-    const defaultPhilosopherOutput: PhilosopherOutput = {
-      valid: true,
-      judgments: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          critique: 'Good alignment',
-          principleAligned: true,
-          score: 0.92,
-          rank: 1,
-        },
-      ],
-      overallAssessment: 'Good candidate',
-      generatedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
-    };
-
-    const defaultScribeArtifact: TrinityDraftArtifact = {
-      selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-      badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-      betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-      rationale: 'Because the principle says so and this is the right approach',
-      sessionId: 'session-test-123',
-      principleId: 'T-01',
-      sourceSnapshotRef: 'snapshot-test-001',
-      telemetry: {
-        chainMode: 'trinity',
-        usedStubs: false,
-        dreamerPassed: true,
-        philosopherPassed: true,
-        scribePassed: true,
-        candidateCount: 1,
-        selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-        stageFailures: [],
-      },
-    };
-
-    return {
-      closeCalled: overrides.closeCalled ?? false,
-      invokeDreamer: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(overrides.dreamerOutput ?? defaultDreamerOutput),
-      invokePhilosopher: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(overrides.philosopherOutput ?? defaultPhilosopherOutput),
-      invokeScribe: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(
-        overrides.scribeArtifact === null ? null : (overrides.scribeArtifact ?? defaultScribeArtifact)
-      ),
-      close: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
-    } as unknown as TrinityRuntimeAdapter & { closeCalled: boolean; invokeDreamer: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>; invokePhilosopher: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>; invokeScribe: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> };
-  }
-
-  it('uses runtime adapter when useStubs=false with adapter provided', async () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const adapter = makeMockAdapter();
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: false,
-      runtimeAdapter: adapter,
-    };
-
-    const result = await runTrinityAsync({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(adapter.invokeDreamer).toHaveBeenCalledWith(snapshot, 'T-08', 3);
-    expect(adapter.invokePhilosopher).toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(adapter.invokeScribe).toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(result.telemetry.usedStubs).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.telemetry.dreamerPassed).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.philosopherPassed).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.scribePassed).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('fails closed when Dreamer stage returns invalid output', async () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const adapter = makeMockAdapter({
-      dreamerOutput: { valid: false, candidates: [], reason: 'No signal found', generatedAt: new Date().toISOString() },
-    });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: false,
-      runtimeAdapter: adapter,
-    };
-
-    const result = await runTrinityAsync({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    expect(result.failures[0].stage).toBe('dreamer');
-    expect(result.telemetry.dreamerPassed).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.telemetry.philosopherPassed).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.telemetry.scribePassed).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('fails closed when Philosopher stage returns invalid output', async () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const adapter = makeMockAdapter({
-      philosopherOutput: { valid: false, judgments: [], overallAssessment: '', reason: 'No candidates', generatedAt: new Date().toISOString() },
-    });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: false,
-      runtimeAdapter: adapter,
-    };
-
-    const result = await runTrinityAsync({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.stage === 'dreamer')).toBe(false);  // Dreamer passed
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.stage === 'philosopher')).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.dreamerPassed).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.philosopherPassed).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('fails closed when Scribe stage returns null', async () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const adapter = makeMockAdapter({ scribeArtifact: null });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: false,
-      runtimeAdapter: adapter,
-    };
-
-    const result = await runTrinityAsync({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.stage === 'scribe')).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.dreamerPassed).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.philosopherPassed).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.scribePassed).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('calls adapter.close() after successful execution', async () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const adapter = makeMockAdapter();
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: false,
-      runtimeAdapter: adapter,
-    };
-
-    await runTrinityAsync({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(adapter.close).toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it('calls adapter.close() even when execution fails', async () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const adapter = makeMockAdapter({
-      dreamerOutput: { valid: false, candidates: [], reason: 'No signal', generatedAt: new Date().toISOString() },
-    });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: false,
-      runtimeAdapter: adapter,
-    };
-
-    await runTrinityAsync({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(adapter.close).toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-
-  it('produces artifact compatible with draftToArtifact', async () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const adapter = makeMockAdapter();
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: false,
-      runtimeAdapter: adapter,
-    };
-
-    const result = await runTrinityAsync({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.artifact).toBeDefined();
-    const artifact = draftToArtifact(result.artifact!);
-    expect(artifact.artifactId).toBeDefined();
-    expect(artifact.sessionId).toBe('session-test-123');
-    expect(artifact.principleId).toBe('T-01');
-    expect(artifact.badDecision).toBeDefined();
-    expect(artifact.betterDecision).toBeDefined();
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: runTrinityAsync — useStubs=true still uses stubs
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('runTrinityAsync — useStubs=true uses synchronous stubs', () => {
-  it('still uses stub implementations when useStubs=true even with adapter', async () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const adapter = {
-      invokeDreamer: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ valid: true, candidates: [], generatedAt: new Date().toISOString() }),
-      invokePhilosopher: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ valid: true, judgments: [], overallAssessment: '', generatedAt: new Date().toISOString() }),
-      invokeScribe: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(null),
-    };
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true,  // Explicitly use stubs
-      runtimeAdapter: adapter as unknown as TrinityRuntimeAdapter,
-    };
-
-    // With stubs, adapter is ignored - stub produces success with failureCount signal
-    const result = await runTrinityAsync({ snapshot, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);  // Stub succeeds because snapshot has failureCount
-    expect(adapter.invokeDreamer).not.toHaveBeenCalled();  // Adapter NOT called
-    expect(adapter.invokePhilosopher).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-    expect(adapter.invokeScribe).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: NOCTURNAL_DREAMER_PROMPT — strategic perspective requirements (Task 1)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('NOCTURNAL_DREAMER_PROMPT — strategic perspective requirements', () => {
-  it('contains "## Strategic Perspective Requirements" section', () => {
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_DREAMER_PROMPT).toContain('## Strategic Perspective Requirements');
-  });
-
-  it('mentions all three strategic perspectives', () => {
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_DREAMER_PROMPT).toContain('conservative_fix');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_DREAMER_PROMPT).toContain('structural_improvement');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_DREAMER_PROMPT).toContain('paradigm_shift');
-  });
-
-  it('contains ANTI-PATTERN warning', () => {
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_DREAMER_PROMPT).toContain('ANTI-PATTERN');
-  });
-
-  it('references riskLevel as required candidate field', () => {
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_DREAMER_PROMPT).toContain('riskLevel');
-  });
-
-  it('references strategicPerspective as required candidate field', () => {
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_DREAMER_PROMPT).toContain('strategicPerspective');
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: DreamerCandidate interface — optional fields (Task 1)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('DreamerCandidate interface — optional fields', () => {
-  it('accepts a candidate with riskLevel and strategicPerspective', () => {
-    const candidate: DreamerCandidate = {
-      candidateIndex: 0,
-      badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-      betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-      rationale: 'Because the principle says so',
-      confidence: 0.9,
-      riskLevel: 'medium',
-      strategicPerspective: 'structural_improvement',
-    };
-    expect(candidate.riskLevel).toBe('medium');
-    expect(candidate.strategicPerspective).toBe('structural_improvement');
-  });
-
-  it('accepts a candidate without riskLevel or strategicPerspective (backward compat)', () => {
-    const candidate: DreamerCandidate = {
-      candidateIndex: 0,
-      badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-      betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-      rationale: 'Because the principle says so',
-      confidence: 0.9,
-    };
-    expect(candidate.riskLevel).toBeUndefined();
-    expect(candidate.strategicPerspective).toBeUndefined();
-  });
-
-  it('accepts all valid riskLevel values', () => {
-    const levels: Array<'low' | 'medium' | 'high'> = ['low', 'medium', 'high'];
-    for (const level of levels) {
-      const candidate: DreamerCandidate = {
-        candidateIndex: 0,
-        badDecision: 'Wrong',
-        betterDecision: 'Right',
-        rationale: 'Because',
-        confidence: 0.8,
-        riskLevel: level,
-      };
-      expect(candidate.riskLevel).toBe(level);
-    }
-  });
-
-  it('accepts all valid strategicPerspective values', () => {
-    const perspectives: Array<'conservative_fix' | 'structural_improvement' | 'paradigm_shift'> = [
-      'conservative_fix',
-      'structural_improvement',
-      'paradigm_shift',
-    ];
-    for (const perspective of perspectives) {
-      const candidate: DreamerCandidate = {
-        candidateIndex: 0,
-        badDecision: 'Wrong',
-        betterDecision: 'Right',
-        rationale: 'Because',
-        confidence: 0.8,
-        strategicPerspective: perspective,
-      };
-      expect(candidate.strategicPerspective).toBe(perspective);
-    }
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: buildDreamerPrompt — reasoning context injection (Task 2)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('buildDreamerPrompt — reasoning context injection', () => {
-  // Helper to create a minimal snapshot for reasoning context tests
-  function makeReasoningSnapshot(overrides: {
-    assistantTurns?: any[];
-    toolCalls?: any[];
-    userTurns?: any[];
-  } = {}) {
-    return {
-      sessionId: 'session-reasoning-test',
-      startedAt: '2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z',
-      updatedAt: '2026-04-13T00:05:00.000Z',
-      assistantTurns: overrides.assistantTurns ?? [],
-      userTurns: overrides.userTurns ?? [],
-      toolCalls: overrides.toolCalls ?? [],
-      painEvents: [],
-      gateBlocks: [],
-      stats: {
-        failureCount: 0,
-        totalPainEvents: 0,
-        totalGateBlocks: 0,
-        totalAssistantTurns: overrides.assistantTurns?.length ?? 0,
-        totalToolCalls: overrides.toolCalls?.length ?? 0,
-      },
-    };
-  }
-
-  it('injects ## Reasoning Context section when assistant turns have thinking content', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeReasoningSnapshot({
-      assistantTurns: [
-        {
-          turnIndex: 0,
-          sanitizedText: '<thinking>I need to consider the implications carefully</thinking>',
-          createdAt: '2026-04-13T00:01:00.000Z',
-        },
-      ],
-    });
-
-    const result = formatReasoningContext(snapshot as any);
-    expect(result).toContain('## Reasoning Context');
-  });
-
-  it('includes uncertainty markers in reasoning context', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeReasoningSnapshot({
-      assistantTurns: [
-        {
-          turnIndex: 0,
-          sanitizedText: 'let me verify this first before proceeding with the change',
-          createdAt: '2026-04-13T00:01:00.000Z',
-        },
-      ],
-    });
-
-    const result = formatReasoningContext(snapshot as any);
-    expect(result).toContain('Uncertainty detected');
-  });
-
-  it('includes confidence signal when not high', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeReasoningSnapshot({
-      assistantTurns: [
-        {
-          turnIndex: 0,
-          sanitizedText: 'I should probably check this more thoroughly before continuing',
-          createdAt: '2026-04-13T00:01:00.000Z',
-        },
-      ],
-    });
-
-    const result = formatReasoningContext(snapshot as any);
-    // Low or medium confidence should be shown
-    expect(result).toMatch(/Confidence:\s*(low|medium)/);
-  });
-
-  it('includes contextual factors when present', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeReasoningSnapshot({
-      assistantTurns: [],
-      toolCalls: [
-        { toolName: 'Read', outcome: 'success', createdAt: '2026-04-13T00:01:00.000Z' },
-        { toolName: 'Edit', outcome: 'success', createdAt: '2026-04-13T00:02:00.000Z' },
-      ],
-    });
-
-    const result = formatReasoningContext(snapshot as any);
-    expect(result).toContain('File structure explored');
-  });
-
-  it('omits ## Reasoning Context when no reasoning signals exist', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeReasoningSnapshot({
-      assistantTurns: [],
-      toolCalls: [
-        { toolName: 'Edit', outcome: 'success', createdAt: '2026-04-13T00:01:00.000Z' },
-      ],
-    });
-
-    const result = formatReasoningContext(snapshot as any);
-    expect(result).toBeNull();
-  });
-
-  it('does not inject decisionPoints', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeReasoningSnapshot({
-      assistantTurns: [
-        {
-          turnIndex: 0,
-          sanitizedText: '<thinking>some thought</thinking>',
-          createdAt: '2026-04-13T00:01:00.000Z',
-        },
-      ],
-    });
-
-    const result = formatReasoningContext(snapshot as any);
-    expect(result).not.toContain('decisionPoint');
-    expect(result).not.toContain('DecisionPoint');
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: invokeStubDreamer — risk level and perspective mapping (D-07)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('invokeStubDreamer — risk level and perspective mapping (D-07)', () => {
-  it('gateBlocks candidates get conservative_fix/low', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ totalGateBlocks: 2 });
-    const output = invokeStubDreamer(snapshot as any, 'T-03', 3);
-    expect(output.valid).toBe(true);
-    expect(output.candidates.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    for (const candidate of output.candidates) {
-      expect(candidate.riskLevel).toBe('low');
-      expect(candidate.strategicPerspective).toBe('conservative_fix');
-    }
-  });
-
-  it('pain candidates get structural_improvement/medium', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ totalPainEvents: 3 });
-    const output = invokeStubDreamer(snapshot as any, 'T-08', 3);
-    expect(output.valid).toBe(true);
-    expect(output.candidates.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    for (const candidate of output.candidates) {
-      expect(candidate.riskLevel).toBe('medium');
-      expect(candidate.strategicPerspective).toBe('structural_improvement');
-    }
-  });
-
-  it('failure candidates get paradigm_shift/high', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const output = invokeStubDreamer(snapshot as any, 'T-08', 3);
-    expect(output.valid).toBe(true);
-    expect(output.candidates.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    for (const candidate of output.candidates) {
-      expect(candidate.riskLevel).toBe('high');
-      expect(candidate.strategicPerspective).toBe('paradigm_shift');
-    }
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: runTrinity — diversity telemetry (DIVER-04)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('runTrinity — diversity telemetry (DIVER-04)', () => {
-  it('emits diversityCheckPassed=false when stub candidates all have same risk level', () => {
-    // Failure signal produces all paradigm_shift/high candidates → not diverse
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true,
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot: snapshot as any, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.diversityCheckPassed).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('emits candidateRiskLevels array matching stub mapping', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true,
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot: snapshot as any, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.telemetry.candidateRiskLevels).toBeDefined();
-    expect(result.telemetry.candidateRiskLevels!.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    // All failure stub candidates should be 'high'
-    for (const level of result.telemetry.candidateRiskLevels!) {
-      expect(level).toBe('high');
-    }
-  });
-
-  it('pipeline completes even when diversity check fails (soft enforcement)', () => {
-    // Failure signal: all candidates have same risk → diversity fails
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2 });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true,
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot: snapshot as any, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    expect(result.telemetry.diversityCheckPassed).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.artifact).toBeDefined();
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: TrinityTelemetry — diversity fields
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('TrinityTelemetry — diversity fields', () => {
-  it('accepts optional diversityCheckPassed field', () => {
-    const telemetry: TrinityTelemetry = {
-      chainMode: 'trinity',
-      usedStubs: true,
-      dreamerPassed: true,
-      philosopherPassed: true,
-      scribePassed: true,
-      candidateCount: 2,
-      selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-      stageFailures: [],
-      diversityCheckPassed: true,
-    };
-    expect(telemetry.diversityCheckPassed).toBe(true);
-  });
-
-  it('accepts optional candidateRiskLevels field', () => {
-    const telemetry: TrinityTelemetry = {
-      chainMode: 'trinity',
-      usedStubs: true,
-      dreamerPassed: true,
-      philosopherPassed: true,
-      scribePassed: true,
-      candidateCount: 2,
-      selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-      stageFailures: [],
-      candidateRiskLevels: ['low', 'high'],
-    };
-    expect(telemetry.candidateRiskLevels).toEqual(['low', 'high']);
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: Philosopher 6D Evaluation (PHILO-01)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('Philosopher 6D Evaluation (PHILO-01)', () => {
-  it('NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT contains 6 dimensions with calibrated weights', () => {
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('Safety Impact');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('UX Impact');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('(weight: 0.20)'); // Principle Alignment
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('(weight: 0.15)'); // Specificity
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('(weight: 0.15)'); // Actionability
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('(weight: 0.15)'); // Executability
-  });
-
-  it('prompt output format includes scores and risks objects', () => {
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('"scores"');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('"principleAlignment"');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('"safetyImpact"');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('"uxImpact"');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('"risks"');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('"falsePositiveEstimate"');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('"implementationComplexity"');
-    expect(NOCTURNAL_PHILOSOPHER_PROMPT).toContain('"breakingChangeRisk"');
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: Philosopher Risk Assessment (PHILO-02)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('Philosopher Risk Assessment (PHILO-02)', () => {
-  it('invokeStubPhilosopher produces risk assessment per candidate', () => {
-    const dreamerOutput: DreamerOutput = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-          betterDecision: 'Read the file before editing to verify content',
-          rationale: 'A good rationale that explains why this is better',
-          confidence: 0.9,
-          riskLevel: 'low',
-          strategicPerspective: 'conservative_fix',
-        },
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 1,
-          badDecision: 'Ignored error messages',
-          betterDecision: 'Challenge the original approach entirely',
-          rationale: 'A paradigm shift rationale for fundamentally different approach',
-          confidence: 0.6,
-          riskLevel: 'high',
-          strategicPerspective: 'paradigm_shift',
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
-    };
-    const result = invokeStubPhilosopher(dreamerOutput, 'T-01', makeSnapshot() as any);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    for (const j of result.judgments) {
-      expect(j.risks).toBeDefined();
-      expect(j.risks!.falsePositiveEstimate).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
-      expect(j.risks!.falsePositiveEstimate).toBeLessThanOrEqual(1);
-      expect(['low', 'medium', 'high']).toContain(j.risks!.implementationComplexity);
-      expect(typeof j.risks!.breakingChangeRisk).toBe('boolean');
-    }
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: Philosopher Backward Compatibility (PHILO-03)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('Philosopher Backward Compatibility (PHILO-03)', () => {
-  it('PhilosopherJudgment without scores/risks is valid', () => {
-    const judgment: PhilosopherJudgment = {
-      candidateIndex: 0,
-      critique: 'test',
-      principleAligned: true,
-      score: 0.8,
-      rank: 1,
-    };
-    expect(judgment.score).toBe(0.8);
-    expect(judgment.scores).toBeUndefined();
-    expect(judgment.risks).toBeUndefined();
-  });
-
-  it('runTrinity produces output with 6D scores when candidates have strategicPerspective', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshot({ failureCount: 2, totalPainEvents: 1 });
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true,
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot: snapshot as any, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.artifact).toBeDefined();
-
-    // The stub philosopher should produce 6D scores for stub candidates
-    // (stub dreamer assigns strategicPerspective based on principleId)
-    if (result.telemetry.philosopher6D) {
-      const avgScores = result.telemetry.philosopher6D.avgScores;
-      expect(typeof avgScores.principleAlignment).toBe('number');
-      expect(typeof avgScores.specificity).toBe('number');
-      expect(typeof avgScores.actionability).toBe('number');
-      expect(typeof avgScores.executability).toBe('number');
-      expect(typeof avgScores.safetyImpact).toBe('number');
-      expect(typeof avgScores.uxImpact).toBe('number');
-    }
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: Stub Philosopher 6D Scoring (D-09)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('Stub Philosopher 6D Scoring (D-09)', () => {
-  it('conservative_fix candidates get high principleAlignment and low risk', () => {
-    const dreamerOutput: DreamerOutput = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-          betterDecision: 'Read the file before editing to verify current content',
-          rationale: 'Following T-01 requires verifying content before making changes',
-          confidence: 0.9,
-          riskLevel: 'low',
-          strategicPerspective: 'conservative_fix',
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
-    };
-    const result = invokeStubPhilosopher(dreamerOutput, 'T-01', makeSnapshot() as any);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    const j = result.judgments[0];
-    expect(j.scores).toBeDefined();
-    expect(j.scores!.principleAlignment).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0.9);
-    expect(j.scores!.safetyImpact).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0.9);
-    expect(j.risks).toBeDefined();
-    expect(j.risks!.breakingChangeRisk).toBe(false);
-    expect(j.risks!.implementationComplexity).toBe('low');
-  });
-
-  it('paradigm_shift candidates get high breakingChangeRisk', () => {
-    const dreamerOutput: DreamerOutput = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Ignored all errors',
-          betterDecision: 'Challenge the entire approach and redesign from scratch',
-          rationale: 'A paradigm shift rationale for a fundamentally different approach',
-          confidence: 0.5,
-          riskLevel: 'high',
-          strategicPerspective: 'paradigm_shift',
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
-    };
-    const result = invokeStubPhilosopher(dreamerOutput, 'T-08', makeSnapshot() as any);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    const j = result.judgments[0];
-    expect(j.scores).toBeDefined();
-    expect(j.scores!.safetyImpact).toBeLessThan(0.5);
-    expect(j.risks).toBeDefined();
-    expect(j.risks!.breakingChangeRisk).toBe(true);
-    expect(j.risks!.implementationComplexity).toBe('high');
-  });
-
-  it('structural_improvement candidates get medium across all dimensions', () => {
-    const dreamerOutput: DreamerOutput = {
-      valid: true,
-      candidates: [
-        {
-          candidateIndex: 0,
-          badDecision: 'Rushed through steps',
-          betterDecision: 'Reorder operations and introduce an intermediate checkpoint',
-          rationale: 'Structural improvement rationale to reorder operations properly',
-          confidence: 0.7,
-          riskLevel: 'medium',
-          strategicPerspective: 'structural_improvement',
-        },
-      ],
-      generatedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
-    };
-    const result = invokeStubPhilosopher(dreamerOutput, 'T-03', makeSnapshot() as any);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    const j = result.judgments[0];
-    expect(j.scores).toBeDefined();
-    // Medium scores should be between conservative and paradigm
-    expect(j.scores!.principleAlignment).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0.7);
-    expect(j.scores!.principleAlignment).toBeLessThanOrEqual(0.8);
-    expect(j.risks).toBeDefined();
-    expect(j.risks!.breakingChangeRisk).toBe(false);
-    expect(j.risks!.implementationComplexity).toBe('medium');
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: TrinityTelemetry — philosopher6D field
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('TrinityTelemetry — philosopher6D field', () => {
-  it('accepts optional philosopher6D field', () => {
-    const telemetry: TrinityTelemetry = {
-      chainMode: 'trinity',
-      usedStubs: true,
-      dreamerPassed: true,
-      philosopherPassed: true,
-      scribePassed: true,
-      candidateCount: 2,
-      selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-      stageFailures: [],
-      philosopher6D: {
-        avgScores: {
-          principleAlignment: 0.85,
-          specificity: 0.75,
-          actionability: 0.8,
-          executability: 0.78,
-          safetyImpact: 0.7,
-          uxImpact: 0.72,
-        },
-        highRiskCount: 1,
-      },
-    };
-    expect(telemetry.philosopher6D).toBeDefined();
-    expect(telemetry.philosopher6D!.avgScores.principleAlignment).toBe(0.85);
-    expect(telemetry.philosopher6D!.highRiskCount).toBe(1);
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: Scribe Contrastive Analysis (SCRIBE-01, SCRIBE-02, SCRIBE-03)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('Scribe Contrastive Analysis (SCRIBE-01, SCRIBE-02, SCRIBE-03)', () => {
-  function makeValidArtifact(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}): TrinityDraftArtifact {
-    return {
-      selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-      badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-      betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-      rationale: 'Because the principle says so and this is the right approach',
-      sessionId: 'session-test-123',
-      principleId: 'T-01',
-      sourceSnapshotRef: 'snapshot-test-001',
-      telemetry: {
-        chainMode: 'trinity',
-        usedStubs: false,
-        dreamerPassed: true,
-        philosopherPassed: true,
-        scribePassed: true,
-        candidateCount: 2,
-        selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-        stageFailures: [],
-      },
-      ...overrides,
-    };
-  }
-
-  it('TrinityDraftArtifact accepts optional rejectedAnalysis fields (SCRIBE-01)', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact({
-      rejectedAnalysis: {
-        whyRejected: 'Lower alignment score',
-        warningSignals: ['missed pain signal', 'ignored gate block'],
-        correctiveThinking: 'Should have verified the routing state before proceeding',
-      },
-    } as Record<string, unknown>);
-    expect(artifact.rejectedAnalysis).toBeDefined();
-    expect(artifact.rejectedAnalysis!.whyRejected).toBe('Lower alignment score');
-    expect(artifact.rejectedAnalysis!.warningSignals).toHaveLength(2);
-    expect(artifact.rejectedAnalysis!.correctiveThinking).toContain('Should have');
-  });
-
-  it('TrinityDraftArtifact accepts optional chosenJustification fields (SCRIBE-02)', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact({
-      chosenJustification: {
-        whyChosen: 'Highest 6D composite score and low breakingChangeRisk',
-        keyInsights: ['Verify routing state before file operations', 'Check pain signals early'],
-        limitations: ['Does not apply when session has no pain history', 'Less relevant for conservative fixes'],
-      },
-    } as Record<string, unknown>);
-    expect(artifact.chosenJustification).toBeDefined();
-    expect(artifact.chosenJustification!.whyChosen).toContain('Highest');
-    expect(artifact.chosenJustification!.keyInsights).toHaveLength(2);
-    expect(artifact.chosenJustification!.limitations).toHaveLength(2);
-  });
-
-  it('TrinityDraftArtifact accepts optional contrastiveAnalysis fields (SCRIBE-03)', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact({
-      contrastiveAnalysis: {
-        criticalDifference: 'Winner checked routing state; loser proceeded without verification',
-        decisionTrigger: 'When session has pain events and gate blocks, verify infrastructure before file operations',
-        preventionStrategy: 'Add a pre-flight check: read the routing status and confirm no pending failures',
-      },
-    } as Record<string, unknown>);
-    expect(artifact.contrastiveAnalysis).toBeDefined();
-    expect(artifact.contrastiveAnalysis!.criticalDifference).toContain('routing state');
-    expect(artifact.contrastiveAnalysis!.decisionTrigger).toContain('When');
-    expect(artifact.contrastiveAnalysis!.preventionStrategy).toContain('pre-flight');
-  });
-
-  it('validateDraftArtifact passes when all three analysis sections are present', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact({
-      rejectedAnalysis: {
-        whyRejected: 'Lower score',
-        warningSignals: ['missed signal'],
-        correctiveThinking: 'Should have checked',
-      },
-      chosenJustification: {
-        whyChosen: 'Best score',
-        keyInsights: ['insight 1'],
-        limitations: ['limitation 1'],
-      },
-      contrastiveAnalysis: {
-        criticalDifference: 'key difference',
-        decisionTrigger: 'When X, do Y',
-        preventionStrategy: 'avoid the rejected path',
-      },
-    } as Record<string, unknown>);
-    const result = validateDraftArtifact(artifact);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.failures).toHaveLength(0);
-  });
-
-  it('RejectedAnalysis interface accepts all required fields', () => {
-    const analysis: RejectedAnalysis = {
-      whyRejected: 'test reason',
-      warningSignals: ['signal 1', 'signal 2'],
-      correctiveThinking: 'correct path',
-    };
-    expect(analysis.whyRejected).toBe('test reason');
-    expect(analysis.warningSignals).toHaveLength(2);
-    expect(analysis.correctiveThinking).toBe('correct path');
-  });
-
-  it('ChosenJustification interface accepts all required fields', () => {
-    const justification: ChosenJustification = {
-      whyChosen: 'test reason',
-      keyInsights: ['insight 1', 'insight 2', 'insight 3'],
-      limitations: ['limitation 1'],
-    };
-    expect(justification.whyChosen).toBe('test reason');
-    expect(justification.keyInsights).toHaveLength(3);
-    expect(justification.limitations).toHaveLength(1);
-  });
-
-  it('ContrastiveAnalysis interface accepts all required fields', () => {
-    const analysis: ContrastiveAnalysis = {
-      criticalDifference: 'key insight',
-      decisionTrigger: 'When X, do Y',
-      preventionStrategy: 'avoid the rejected path',
-    };
-    expect(analysis.criticalDifference).toBe('key insight');
-    expect(analysis.decisionTrigger).toBe('When X, do Y');
-    expect(analysis.preventionStrategy).toBe('avoid the rejected path');
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: Scribe Backward Compatibility (SCRIBE-04)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('Scribe Backward Compatibility (SCRIBE-04)', () => {
-  function makeValidArtifact(): TrinityDraftArtifact {
-    return {
-      selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-      badDecision: 'Did something wrong',
-      betterDecision: 'Do it right',
-      rationale: 'Because the principle says so and this is the right approach',
-      sessionId: 'session-test-123',
-      principleId: 'T-01',
-      sourceSnapshotRef: 'snapshot-test-001',
-      telemetry: {
-        chainMode: 'trinity',
-        usedStubs: false,
-        dreamerPassed: true,
-        philosopherPassed: true,
-        scribePassed: true,
-        candidateCount: 2,
-        selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-        stageFailures: [],
-      },
-    };
-  }
-
-  it('TrinityDraftArtifact without contrastiveAnalysis fields is valid', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact();
-    expect(artifact.contrastiveAnalysis).toBeUndefined();
-    expect(artifact.rejectedAnalysis).toBeUndefined();
-    expect(artifact.chosenJustification).toBeUndefined();
-    const result = validateDraftArtifact(artifact);
-    expect(result.valid).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.failures).toHaveLength(0);
-  });
-
-  it('artifact without new fields produces identical output via draftToArtifact', () => {
-    const artifact = makeValidArtifact();
-    const nocturnalArtifact = draftToArtifact(artifact);
-    expect(nocturnalArtifact.badDecision).toBe('Did something wrong');
-    expect(nocturnalArtifact.betterDecision).toBe('Do it right');
-    expect(nocturnalArtifact.principleId).toBe('T-01');
-  });
-
-  it('runTrinity produces artifact without contrastiveAnalysis when useStubs=true', () => {
-    const snapshot = {
-      sessionId: 'session-backward-compat',
-      startedAt: '2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z',
-      updatedAt: '2026-04-13T00:05:00.000Z',
-      assistantTurns: [],
-      userTurns: [],
-      toolCalls: [],
-      painEvents: [],
-      gateBlocks: [],
-      stats: {
-        failureCount: 1,
-        totalPainEvents: 0,
-        totalGateBlocks: 0,
-        totalAssistantTurns: 5,
-        totalToolCalls: 10,
-      },
-    };
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true,
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot: snapshot as any, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.artifact).toBeDefined();
-    expect(result.artifact!.contrastiveAnalysis).toBeUndefined();
-    expect(result.artifact!.rejectedAnalysis).toBeUndefined();
-    expect(result.artifact!.chosenJustification).toBeUndefined();
-  });
-});
-
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// Tests: validateExtraction — Hallucination Detection (SDK-QUAL-02)
-// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-describe('validateExtraction — Hallucination Detection (SDK-QUAL-02)', () => {
-  function makeArtifact(badDecision: string, overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}): TrinityDraftArtifact {
-    return {
-      selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-      badDecision,
-      betterDecision: 'Do it right instead',
-      rationale: 'Because the principle says so and this is the correct approach',
-      sessionId: 'session-test-123',
-      principleId: 'T-01',
-      sourceSnapshotRef: 'snapshot-test-001',
-      telemetry: {
-        chainMode: 'trinity',
-        usedStubs: true,
-        dreamerPassed: true,
-        philosopherPassed: true,
-        scribePassed: true,
-        candidateCount: 1,
-        selectedCandidateIndex: 0,
-        stageFailures: [],
-      },
-      ...overrides,
-    };
-  }
-
-  function makeSnapshotWithEvidence(overrides: {
-    failedToolCalls?: Array<{ toolName: string; filePath?: string; errorMessage?: string }>;
-    painEvents?: Array<{ source: string; score: number; reason?: string }>;
-    gateBlocks?: Array<{ toolName: string; reason: string }>;
-    userCorrections?: number;
-  } = {}) {
-    const toolCalls = (overrides.failedToolCalls ?? []).map(tc => ({
-      toolName: tc.toolName,
-      outcome: 'failure' as const,
-      filePath: tc.filePath ?? null,
-      durationMs: null,
-      exitCode: 1,
-      errorType: 'runtime_error',
-      errorMessage: tc.errorMessage ?? 'unknown error',
-      createdAt: '2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z',
-    }));
-
-    const painEvents = (overrides.painEvents ?? []).map(pe => ({
-      source: pe.source,
-      score: pe.score,
-      severity: 'medium' as const,
-      reason: pe.reason ?? null,
-      createdAt: '2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z',
-    }));
-
-    const gateBlocks = (overrides.gateBlocks ?? []).map(gb => ({
-      toolName: gb.toolName,
-      filePath: null,
-      reason: gb.reason,
-      planStatus: null,
-      createdAt: '2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z',
-    }));
-
-    const userTurns = Array.from({ length: overrides.userCorrections ?? 0 }, (_, i) => ({
-      turnIndex: i,
-      correctionDetected: true,
-      correctionCue: 'wrong approach',
-      createdAt: '2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z',
-    }));
-
-    return {
-      sessionId: 'session-test-123',
-      startedAt: '2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z',
-      updatedAt: '2026-04-17T00:05:00.000Z',
-      assistantTurns: [],
-      userTurns,
-      toolCalls: toolCalls,
-      painEvents,
-      gateBlocks,
-      stats: {
-        failureCount: toolCalls.length,
-        totalPainEvents: painEvents.length,
-        totalGateBlocks: gateBlocks.length,
-        totalAssistantTurns: 5,
-        totalToolCalls: 10,
-      },
-    };
-  }
-
-  it('passes when badDecision references a tool failure from the snapshot', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshotWithEvidence({
-      failedToolCalls: [{ toolName: 'Edit', filePath: 'src/config.ts', errorMessage: 'permission denied' }],
-    });
-    const artifact = makeArtifact('Proceeded with Edit on src/config.ts without checking permission');
-
-    const result = validateExtraction(artifact, snapshot as any);
-
-    expect(result.isGrounded).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.evidenceTypes).toContain('tool_failures');
-  });
-
-  it('passes when badDecision references a pain event from the snapshot', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshotWithEvidence({
-      painEvents: [{ source: 'gate', score: 70, reason: 'accumulated friction from repeated file operation failures' }],
-    });
-    const artifact = makeArtifact('Ignored accumulated friction from file operations');
-
-    const result = validateExtraction(artifact, snapshot as any);
-
-    expect(result.isGrounded).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.evidenceTypes).toContain('pain_events');
-  });
-
-  it('passes when badDecision references a gate block from the snapshot', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshotWithEvidence({
-      gateBlocks: [{ toolName: 'Bash', reason: 'destructive command blocked by safety gate' }],
-    });
-    const artifact = makeArtifact('Attempted to execute a destructive Bash command that was blocked by the gate');
-
-    const result = validateExtraction(artifact, snapshot as any);
-
-    expect(result.isGrounded).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.evidenceTypes).toContain('gate_blocks');
-  });
-
-  it('passes when badDecision references user corrections', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshotWithEvidence({
-      userCorrections: 2,
-    });
-    const artifact = makeArtifact('Continued with the wrong approach despite user corrections');
-
-    const result = validateExtraction(artifact, snapshot as any);
-
-    expect(result.isGrounded).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.evidenceTypes).toContain('user_corrections');
-  });
-
-  it('detects hallucination when badDecision has no overlap with snapshot evidence', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshotWithEvidence({
-      failedToolCalls: [{ toolName: 'Read', filePath: 'package.json', errorMessage: 'file not found' }],
-    });
-    const artifact = makeArtifact('Deployed production database without running migration scripts first');
-
-    const result = validateExtraction(artifact, snapshot as any);
-
-    expect(result.isGrounded).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.reason).toContain('Hallucinated extraction');
-  });
-
-  it('passes when snapshot has no evidence at all (no signal to validate against)', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshotWithEvidence();
-    const artifact = makeArtifact('Made an incorrect decision during the session');
-
-    const result = validateExtraction(artifact, snapshot as any);
-
-    // No evidence means we cannot validate -- allow through
-    expect(result.isGrounded).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.evidenceTypes).toHaveLength(0);
-  });
-
-  it('provides evidence preview for telemetry', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshotWithEvidence({
-      failedToolCalls: [{ toolName: 'Write', filePath: 'output.log', errorMessage: 'permission denied for write operation' }],
-      painEvents: [{ source: 'hook', score: 80, reason: 'repeated permission denied failures during write operation' }],
-    });
-    const artifact = makeArtifact('Proceeded with write operation on output.log despite permission denied error');
-
-    const result = validateExtraction(artifact, snapshot as any);
-
-    expect(result.isGrounded).toBe(true);
-    expect(result.evidencePreview.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-    expect(result.evidenceTypes).toContain('tool_failures');
-    expect(result.evidenceTypes).toContain('pain_events');
-  });
-
-  it('detects hallucination with unrelated but specific badDecision text', () => {
-    const snapshot = makeSnapshotWithEvidence({
-      painEvents: [{ source: 'gate', score: 60, reason: 'rate limit exceeded for API calls' }],
-    });
-    const artifact = makeArtifact('Deleted the primary database without creating a backup first');
-
-    const result = validateExtraction(artifact, snapshot as any);
-
-    expect(result.isGrounded).toBe(false);
-  });
-
-  it('runTrinity stub path fails when hallucination is detected', () => {
-    // Create a snapshot with failure signals so stub candidates are generated
-    // but override the tool calls to be something completely unrelated to what
-    // the stub Dreamer generates (which mentions "failing operation")
-    const snapshot = {
-      sessionId: 'session-hallucination-test',
-      startedAt: '2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z',
-      updatedAt: '2026-04-17T00:05:00.000Z',
-      assistantTurns: [],
-      userTurns: [],
-      toolCalls: [
-        {
-          toolName: 'Grep',
-          outcome: 'failure' as const,
-          filePath: null,
-          durationMs: null,
-          exitCode: 1,
-          errorType: 'timeout',
-          errorMessage: 'search timed out after 30 seconds',
-          createdAt: '2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z',
-        },
-      ],
-      painEvents: [],
-      gateBlocks: [],
-      stats: {
-        failureCount: 1,
-        totalPainEvents: 0,
-        totalGateBlocks: 0,
-        totalAssistantTurns: 2,
-        totalToolCalls: 1,
-      },
-    };
-
-    const config: TrinityConfig = {
-      useTrinity: true,
-      maxCandidates: 3,
-      useStubs: true,
-    };
-
-    const result = runTrinity({ snapshot: snapshot as any, principleId: 'T-08', config });
-
-    // The stub Dreamer generates candidates mentioning "failing operation" and "config.json"
-    // The snapshot has a Grep failure with "search timed out"
-    // With the normalized token matching: badDecisionTokens = {retry,faili,oper,diagnos,root,caus}
-    // and evidenceTokens = {search,timed,after,seconds,timedout} — no overlap → extraction fails
-    // So result.success must be false with a Hallucinated failure.
-    expect(result.success).toBe(false);
-    expect(result.failures.some(f => f.reason?.includes('Hallucinated'))).toBe(true);
-  });
-});