porffor 0.2.0-08a272e → 0.2.0-1afe9b8

package/README.md

@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ No particular order and no guarentees, just what could happen soon™
   - *Basic* Wasm engine (interpreter) in JS
 - More math operators (`**`, etc)
 - `do { ... } while (...)`
-- Rewrite `console.log` to work with strings/arrays
+- Typed export inputs (array)
 - Exceptions
   - Rewrite to use actual strings (optional?)
   - `try { } finally { }`
@@ -130,7 +130,10 @@ No particular order and no guarentees, just what could happen soon™
   - Rewrite local indexes per func for smallest local header and remove unused idxs
   - Smarter inline selection (snapshots?)
   - Remove const ifs (`if (true)`, etc)
-  - Use type(script) information to remove unneeded typechecker code
+  - Memory alignment
+- Runtime
+  - WASI target
+  - Run precompiled Wasm file if given
 - Cool proposals
   - [Optional Chaining Assignment](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-optional-chaining-assignment)
   - [Modulus and Additional Integer Math](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-integer-and-modulus-math)
@@ -139,9 +142,12 @@ No particular order and no guarentees, just what could happen soon™
   - [Seeded Pseudo-Random Numbers](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-seeded-random)
   - [`do` expressions](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions)
   - [String Trim Characters](https://github.com/Kingwl/proposal-string-trim-characters)
+- Posts
+  - Inlining investigation
+- Self hosted testing?
 
 ## Performance
-*For the things it supports most of the time*, Porffor is blazingly fast compared to most interpreters, and common engines running without JIT. For those with JIT, it is not that much slower like a traditional interpreter would be; mostly the same or a bit faster/slower depending on what.
+*For the things it supports most of the time*, Porffor is *blazingly fast* compared to most interpreters, and common engines running without JIT. For those with JIT, it is usually slower by default, but can catch up with compiler arguments and typed input.
 
 ![Screenshot of comparison chart](https://github.com/CanadaHonk/porffor/assets/19228318/76c75264-cc68-4be1-8891-c06dc389d97a)
 
@@ -165,10 +171,12 @@ Mostly for reducing size. I do not really care about compiler perf/time as long
 - Remove unneeded blocks (no `br`s inside)
 - Remove unused imports
 - Use data segments for initing arrays/strings
+- (Likely more not documented yet, todo)
 
 ### Wasm module
 - Type cache/index (no repeated types)
 - No main func if empty (and other exports)
+- No tags if unused/optimized out
 
 ## Test262
 Porffor can run Test262 via some hacks/transforms which remove unsupported features whilst still doing the same asserts (eg simpler error messages using literals only). It currently passes >10% (see latest commit desc for latest and details). Use `node test262` to test, it will also show a difference of overall results between the last commit and current results.
@@ -201,10 +209,13 @@ Porffor can run Test262 via some hacks/transforms which remove unsupported featu
 - `test262`: test262 runner and utils
 
 ## Usecases
-Basically none (other than giving people headaches). Potential ideas to come?
+Basically none right now (other than giving people headaches). Potential ideas:
+- Safety. As Porffor is written in JS, a memory-safe language\*, and compiles JS to Wasm, a fully sandboxed environment\*, it is quite safe. (\* These rely on the underlying implementations being secure. You could also run Wasm, or even Porffor itself, with an interpreter instead of a JIT for bonus security points too.)
+- Compiling JS to native binaries. This is still very early, [`2c`](#2c) is not that good yet :(
+- More in future probably?
 
 ## Usage
-Basically nothing will work :). See files in `test` for examples.
+Basically nothing will work :). See files in `test` and `bench` for examples.
 
 1. Clone repo
 2. `npm install`

package/compiler/builtins.js

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-import { Blocktype, Opcodes, Valtype } from "./wasmSpec.js";
+import { Blocktype, Opcodes, Valtype, ValtypeSize } from "./wasmSpec.js";
 import { number, i32x4 } from "./embedding.js";
 
 export const importedFuncs = [
@@ -29,6 +29,21 @@ for (let i = 0; i < importedFuncs.length; i++) {
 
 const char = c => number(c.charCodeAt(0));
 
+const printStaticStr = str => {
+  const out = [];
+
+  for (let i = 0; i < str.length; i++) {
+    out.push(
+      // ...number(str.charCodeAt(i)),
+      ...number(str.charCodeAt(i), Valtype.i32),
+      Opcodes.i32_from_u,
+      [ Opcodes.call, importedFuncs.printChar ]
+    );
+  }
+
+  return out;
+};
+
 // todo: somehow diff between these (undefined != null) while remaining falsey in wasm as a number value
 export const UNDEFINED = 0;
 export const NULL = 0;
@@ -155,25 +170,6 @@ export const BuiltinFuncs = function() {
     ]
   };
 
-  // todo: return false for NaN
-  this.Boolean = {
-    params: [ valtypeBinary ],
-    locals: [],
-    returns: [ valtypeBinary ],
-    returnType: 'boolean',
-    wasm: [
-      [ Opcodes.local_get, 0 ],
-      ...(valtype === 'f64' ? [
-        ...number(0),
-        [ Opcodes.f64_ne ]
-      ] : [
-        ...Opcodes.eqz,
-        [ Opcodes.i32_eqz ]
-      ]),
-      Opcodes.i32_from
-    ]
-  };
-
   // just return given (default 0) for (new) Object() as we somewhat supports object just not constructor
   this.Object = {
     params: [ valtypeBinary ],
@@ -187,12 +183,125 @@ export const BuiltinFuncs = function() {
 
 
   this.__console_log = {
-    params: [ valtypeBinary ],
-    locals: [],
+    params: [ valtypeBinary, Valtype.i32 ],
+    typedParams: true,
+    locals: [ Valtype.i32, Valtype.i32 ],
     returns: [],
-    wasm: [
-      [ Opcodes.local_get, 0 ],
-      [ Opcodes.call, importedFuncs.print ],
+    wasm: (scope, { TYPES, typeSwitch }) => [
+      ...typeSwitch(scope, [ [ Opcodes.local_get, 1 ] ], {
+        [TYPES.number]: [
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 0 ],
+          [ Opcodes.call, importedFuncs.print ],
+        ],
+        [TYPES.boolean]: [
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 0 ],
+          Opcodes.i32_to_u,
+          [ Opcodes.if, Blocktype.void ],
+          ...printStaticStr('true'),
+          [ Opcodes.else ],
+          ...printStaticStr('false'),
+          [ Opcodes.end ]
+        ],
+        [TYPES.string]: [
+          // simply print a string :))
+          // cache input pointer as i32
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 0 ],
+          Opcodes.i32_to_u,
+          [ Opcodes.local_tee, 2 ],
+
+          // make end pointer
+          [ Opcodes.i32_load, Math.log2(ValtypeSize.i32) - 1, 0 ],
+          ...number(ValtypeSize.i16, Valtype.i32),
+          [ Opcodes.i32_mul ],
+
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 2 ],
+          [ Opcodes.i32_add ],
+          [ Opcodes.local_set, 3 ],
+
+          [ Opcodes.loop, Blocktype.void ],
+
+          // print current char
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 2 ],
+          [ Opcodes.i32_load16_u, Math.log2(ValtypeSize.i16) - 1, ValtypeSize.i32 ],
+          Opcodes.i32_from_u,
+          [ Opcodes.call, importedFuncs.printChar ],
+
+          // increment pointer by sizeof i16
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 2 ],
+          ...number(ValtypeSize.i16, Valtype.i32),
+          [ Opcodes.i32_add ],
+          [ Opcodes.local_tee, 2 ],
+
+          // if pointer != end pointer, loop
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 3 ],
+          [ Opcodes.i32_ne ],
+          [ Opcodes.br_if, 0 ],
+
+          [ Opcodes.end ]
+        ],
+        [TYPES._array]: [
+          ...printStaticStr('[ '),
+
+          // cache input pointer as i32
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 0 ],
+          Opcodes.i32_to_u,
+          [ Opcodes.local_tee, 2 ],
+
+          // make end pointer
+          [ Opcodes.i32_load, Math.log2(ValtypeSize.i32) - 1, 0 ],
+          ...number(ValtypeSize[valtype], Valtype.i32),
+          [ Opcodes.i32_mul ],
+
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 2 ],
+          [ Opcodes.i32_add ],
+          [ Opcodes.local_set, 3 ],
+
+          [ Opcodes.loop, Blocktype.void ],
+
+          // print current char
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 2 ],
+          [ Opcodes.load, Math.log2(ValtypeSize.i16) - 1, ValtypeSize.i32 ],
+          [ Opcodes.call, importedFuncs.print ],
+
+          // increment pointer by sizeof valtype
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 2 ],
+          ...number(ValtypeSize[valtype], Valtype.i32),
+          [ Opcodes.i32_add ],
+          [ Opcodes.local_tee, 2 ],
+
+          // if pointer != end pointer, print separator and loop
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 3 ],
+          [ Opcodes.i32_ne ],
+          [ Opcodes.if, Blocktype.void ],
+          ...printStaticStr(', '),
+          [ Opcodes.br, 1 ],
+          [ Opcodes.end ],
+
+          [ Opcodes.end ],
+
+          ...printStaticStr(' ]'),
+        ],
+        [TYPES.undefined]: [
+          ...printStaticStr('undefined')
+        ],
+        [TYPES.function]: [
+          ...printStaticStr('function () {}')
+        ],
+        [TYPES.object]: [
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 0 ],
+          Opcodes.i32_to_u,
+          [ Opcodes.if, Blocktype.void ],
+          ...printStaticStr('{}'),
+          [ Opcodes.else ],
+          ...printStaticStr('null'),
+          [ Opcodes.end ]
+        ],
+        default: [
+          [ Opcodes.local_get, 0 ],
+          [ Opcodes.call, importedFuncs.print ],
+        ]
+      }, Blocktype.void),
+
       ...char('\n'),
       [ Opcodes.call, importedFuncs.printChar ]
     ]
@@ -571,6 +680,23 @@ export const BuiltinFuncs = function() {
   };
 
 
+  this.__Porffor_type = {
+    params: [ valtypeBinary, Valtype.i32 ],
+    typedParams: true,
+    locals: [ Valtype.i32, Valtype.i32 ],
+    returns: [ valtypeBinary ],
+    returnType: process.argv.includes('-bytestring') ? '_bytestring' : 'string',
+    wasm: (scope, { TYPE_NAMES, typeSwitch, makeString }) => {
+      const bc = {};
+      for (const x in TYPE_NAMES) {
+        bc[x] = makeString(scope, TYPE_NAMES[x], false, '#Porffor_type_result');
+      }
+
+      return typeSwitch(scope, [ [ Opcodes.local_get, 1 ] ], bc);
+    }
+  };
+
+
   this.__SIMD_i32x4_load = {
     params: [ Valtype.i32 ],
     locals: [],