plugin-x402-endpoints 0.4.0 → 0.5.0

package/dist/index.cjs

@@ -2405,6 +2405,134 @@ var catalog_default = {
           "seller"
         ]
       }
+    },
+    {
+      tool: "agent_clearance_packet",
+      action: "X402_AGENT_CLEARANCE_PACKET",
+      path: "/agent/clearance-packet",
+      method: "GET",
+      price: "$1.50",
+      description: "Signed clearance packet an AI agent buys BEFORE moving significant capital to a counterparty wallet: one call fuses OFAC/sanctions + mixer screening, multi-hop fund-flow forensics (circular/layering, concentration, hubs) and on-chain counterparty settlement trust into a single CLEAR/REVIEW/BLOCK verdict with the evaluated amount, a policy-bounded APPROVED amount, structured reasons, a short expiry and an Ed25519 signature verifiable offline. Can I send this capital to THIS wallet? Amount-scoped; the packet expires and is re-bought at the next move. Pre-payment AML/KYT clearance and counterparty due-diligence for autonomous agents. Price: $1.50 per call (x402 payment, USDC on Base mainnet). Signed clearance packet before an agent moves significant capital to a wallet: fuses OFAC/sanctions + mixer screening, multi-hop fund-flow forensics (circular/layering, concentration, hubs) and on-chain counterparty settlement trust into one CLEAR/REVIEW/BLOCK verdict with the evaluated amount, a policy-bounded approved amount, a short expiry and an Ed25519 signature verifiable offline. Pre-payment AML/KYT clearance and counterparty due-diligence for autonomous agents. Input: to (counterparty wallet) + amount_usd (+ optional depth).",
+      llm_usage_prompt: "Signed clearance packet before an agent moves significant capital to a wallet: fuses OFAC/mixer screening + multi-hop fund-flow forensics + on-chain counterparty settlement trust into one CLEAR/REVIEW/BLOCK verdict with the evaluated amount, a policy-bounded approved amount, a short expiry and an Ed25519 signature. Input: to + amount_usd (+depth).",
+      tags: [
+        "clearance-packet",
+        "pre-transaction-compliance",
+        "aml-screening",
+        "wallet-forensics",
+        "counterparty-risk"
+      ],
+      inputSchema: {
+        type: "object",
+        properties: {
+          to: {
+            type: "string",
+            description: "Counterparty EVM wallet the capital will move to (0x + 40 hex)",
+            pattern: "^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$"
+          },
+          amount_usd: {
+            type: "number",
+            description: "Capital about to move, in USD, e.g. 800 \u2014 scopes the verdict and approved amount"
+          },
+          depth: {
+            type: "integer",
+            description: "Forensics graph hops: 1, 2 or 3 (default 2)"
+          }
+        },
+        required: [
+          "to",
+          "amount_usd"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      tool: "agent_visibility_audit",
+      action: "X402_AGENT_VISIBILITY_AUDIT",
+      path: "/agent/visibility-audit",
+      method: "GET",
+      price: "$1.00",
+      description: "Audit how discoverable an x402 agent/seller is across the agent registries (CDP Bazaar, 402index) and get the exact fixes: keyword-RELEVANCE rank per category (not the raw settled-volume rank the free explorers show), a metadata-quality score of your advertised endpoints (description density, typed input schema, real output.example, tags, llm_usage_prompt), on-chain settle activity, a top-3 competitor benchmark, impact-prioritized fixes, and a DELTA vs a previous signed snapshot you carry back ('+N places since <date>'). Why am I not being found, and how do I climb? Discovery/GEO/AEO audit for x402 sellers, signed Ed25519. Price: $1.00 per call (x402 payment, USDC on Base mainnet). Discoverability audit of an x402 agent/seller across the agent registries (CDP Bazaar, 402index): keyword-relevance rank per category (not raw settled-volume rank), metadata-quality score of advertised endpoints (description density, typed input schema, output.example, tags, llm_usage_prompt), on-chain settle activity, top-3 competitor benchmark, impact-prioritized fixes, and a signed delta vs a previous snapshot you carry back. Why am I not being found and how do I climb? Discovery/GEO/AEO audit for x402 sellers. Input: seller (wallet or origin domain) (+ optional prior signed snapshot).",
+      llm_usage_prompt: "Discoverability audit of an x402 seller across the agent registries: keyword-relevance rank per category, metadata-quality score, on-chain settle activity, top-3 benchmark, prioritized fixes, and a signed delta vs a prior snapshot. GEO/AEO for x402 sellers. Input: seller (wallet or domain) (+snapshot).",
+      tags: [
+        "visibility-audit",
+        "x402-discoverability",
+        "bazaar-ranking",
+        "aeo-geo",
+        "registry-optimization"
+      ],
+      inputSchema: {
+        type: "object",
+        properties: {
+          seller: {
+            type: "string",
+            description: "Seller to audit: wallet (0x + 40 hex) or origin URL/domain, e.g. 'api.example.com' or '0x1D1B...620f'"
+          },
+          snapshot: {
+            type: "string",
+            description: "Optional: the signed_snapshot JSON from a previous audit, to compute a dated delta"
+          }
+        },
+        required: [
+          "seller"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      tool: "agent_rank_check",
+      action: "X402_AGENT_RANK_CHECK",
+      path: "/agent/rank-check",
+      method: "GET",
+      price: "$0.10",
+      description: "Quick check of where an x402 seller ranks RIGHT NOW by keyword-relevance in the CDP Bazaar discovery (not the raw settled-volume rank the free explorers show): best rank + per-category-keyword rank in one cheap call, plus a pointer to the full /agent/visibility-audit when the rank slips. The frequent pulse for monitoring your x402 discoverability. Where do I rank now? Am I being out-ranked on my category keywords? Price: $0.10 per call (x402 payment, USDC on Base mainnet). Quick keyword-relevance rank of an x402 seller in CDP Bazaar discovery (not the raw settled-volume rank the free explorers show): best rank + per-category-keyword rank in one cheap call, plus a pointer to the full visibility-audit when the rank slips. The frequent pulse for monitoring x402 discoverability. Input: seller (wallet or origin domain).",
+      llm_usage_prompt: "Quick keyword-relevance rank of an x402 seller in CDP Bazaar discovery (not raw settled-volume rank) + a pointer to the full visibility-audit when the rank slips. Input: seller (wallet or domain).",
+      tags: [
+        "rank-check",
+        "x402-discoverability",
+        "bazaar-ranking",
+        "keyword-rank",
+        "discovery-monitor"
+      ],
+      inputSchema: {
+        type: "object",
+        properties: {
+          seller: {
+            type: "string",
+            description: "Seller to check: wallet (0x + 40 hex) or origin URL/domain, e.g. 'api.example.com'"
+          }
+        },
+        required: [
+          "seller"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    {
+      tool: "agent_passport",
+      action: "X402_AGENT_PASSPORT",
+      path: "/agent/passport",
+      method: "GET",
+      price: "$1.00",
+      description: "Measured-vs-declared reputation dossier for an AI agent, corrected for Sybil manipulation. Give an ERC-8004 agent id or a wallet: reads the on-chain ERC-8004 Identity + Reputation registries on Base, computes the DECLARED reputation (review count/reviewers/values) then the MEASURED, Sybil-corrected reputation (deterministic signals: owner agent-farming, reviewers with no economic footprint, review concentration, value uniformity, placeholder tags, and whether real on-chain settlements back the reviews), and returns the DELTA + a signed, offline-verifiable verdict. Is this agent's reputation real or inflated? ERC-8004 reputation is widely Sybil-manipulated (arXiv:2606.26028); the declared-vs-measured gap is the product. Audit-grade, not a score lookup. Price: $1.00 per call (x402 payment, USDC on Base mainnet). Measured-vs-declared ERC-8004 agent reputation dossier, Sybil-corrected: reads the on-chain ERC-8004 Identity + Reputation registries on Base, computes the declared reputation (review count/reviewers/values) then the measured, Sybil-corrected reputation (owner agent-farming, footprint-less reviewers, review concentration, value uniformity, placeholder tags, unbacked-by-settlement), and returns the delta + a signed offline-verifiable verdict. Is this agent's reputation real or inflated? Audit-grade counterparty due-diligence. Input: agent_id (ERC-8004 tokenId) OR wallet.",
+      llm_usage_prompt: "Measured-vs-declared ERC-8004 agent reputation dossier, Sybil-corrected: reads on-chain ERC-8004 Identity + Reputation registries, computes declared then measured (Sybil signals) reputation, returns the delta + a signed verdict. Is this agent's reputation real or inflated? Input: agent_id (ERC-8004 tokenId) OR wallet.",
+      tags: [
+        "agent-passport",
+        "erc-8004",
+        "agent-reputation",
+        "sybil-detection",
+        "counterparty-due-diligence"
+      ],
+      inputSchema: {
+        type: "object",
+        properties: {
+          agent_id: {
+            type: "integer",
+            description: "ERC-8004 agent identity tokenId (IdentityRegistry). Provide this OR wallet."
+          },
+          wallet: {
+            type: "string",
+            description: "Agent wallet (0x + 40 hex); resolved to its ERC-8004 agentId. Provide this OR agent_id.",
+            pattern: "^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$"
+          }
+        }
+      }
     }
   ]
 };