pi-pstack-native 0.0.0-stage → 1.0.0

package/skills/architect/references/rationale-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# Rationale template
+
+The prose that ships alongside the type sketch. One page. Sentence-case headings, no boilerplate. Replace the italic notes with actual content.
+
+## Problem
+
+*One paragraph. What we're trying to do, and what about the existing system or constraints makes the shape non-obvious. If [Phase A](../SKILL.md#phase-a-ground-the-problem) surfaced constraints the design must honor (existing types to interop with, callers we can't break, invariants that crossed our boundary), name them here so the reader sees the same constraints you saw.*
+
+## Usage (caller's view)
+
+*Write this first, before the type sketch. Show the README or quickstart the consumer reads, plus two or three realistic call sites in their own code. What they import, what they call, what comes back. The type sketch in [Shape](#shape) is derived from this. The two must agree. When they diverge, reconcile the sketch to the usage, not the reverse. The caller's experience is the spec. The types serve it.*
+
+## Shape
+
+*The recommended architecture. Data structures first. Then how data flows through the signatures. Name the load-bearing decisions. State which invariants are encoded in types, where validation lives, and what the system deliberately does not do. Judge interface depth explicitly. State what complexity the public surface hides, what remains exposed to callers, and why the interface is no larger than needed. Cite the principle behind each decision (e.g., `per boundary-discipline`). Don't restate it.*
+
+## Synthesis decision
+
+*Filled in by [arena](../../arena/SKILL.md). Records which candidate became the base and why, what was adapted from each of the others, and what was rejected and why.*
+
+## Tradeoffs accepted
+
+*One bullet per tradeoff the chosen shape makes. Form: "we accept X in exchange for Y." Name anything a future reader might mistake for an oversight, including things that look like premature optimization or premature simplification.*
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+*Required. Name at least one concrete alternative shape, with one line on why it lost. Judge each alternative on interface depth, not implementation simplicity alone. Name the complexity it exposes to callers and the complexity it hides. Two or three alternatives belong here when the design space had real contenders. One is fine when the constraints forced the answer, with the conclusion phrased as "this was the only viable shape because..." Avoid listing flavors of the same shape. This section covers design alternatives the chosen shape considered and rejected, not other runner candidates.*
+
+## Open questions and risks
+
+*Things you noticed during the sketch that the human needs to weigh in on, and risks worth flagging before implementation starts. Phrase as questions, not assertions, so the human's answer is the resolution rather than a comment.*
+
+## Next implementation step
+
+*The first thing to build against the sketch. One sentence. What you'd start writing immediately after synthesis (or after Phase D sign-off, if a checkpoint was opted into).*

package/skills/architect/references/runner-prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+# Architect runner prompt
+
+The orchestrator passes this file through to every parallel candidate runner during Phase B and fills in the variable inputs around it: the task, the Phase A grounding artifacts, the isolated working directory, and the path to write outputs. The working directory is a git worktree when available, otherwise a per-runner subdirectory under the sketch dir. What matters is independence between candidates.
+
+You are producing one candidate design in architect's parallel exploration. Read the **architect** skill in full first. That's the workflow you're inside. Output a candidate design package: type sketch, function signatures, module map, and prose rationale shaped per [`rationale-template.md`](rationale-template.md).
+
+Apply the following discipline. The orchestrator compares candidates on these axes to pick a base.
+
+- Caller's usage first. Write the README-style usage and two or three real call sites before the types, then derive the type sketch from them. The usage is the spec. The two must agree, so reconcile the sketch to the usage, not the reverse.
+- Data structures first. Get the core types right and the code becomes obvious. Trace each dominant access pattern through the proposed structure. If the answer is "we'll add a map / index / cache later," the structure is wrong.
+- Interface depth. Compare the capability hidden behind the public surface relative to the size of that surface. Prefer a simple interface that pulls complexity into the callee, even when the implementation becomes less simple. Do not put transport or wire types on the public API. Parse into domain types behind the interface.
+- Shared state: if two actors might both write, ask "what happens?" If the answer isn't "nothing," default to per-actor state with a merge at the read boundary, per the **separate-before-serializing-shared-state** principle skill.
+- Make boundaries visible. `not implemented` errors for bodies, `// TODO` pseudocode for tricky logic, doc comments stating intent and invariants. A reader should trace data from input to output by reading types and signatures alone.
+- Encode invariants in types: hard-to-misuse types > runtime checks > prose comments, per the **encode-lessons-in-structure** principle skill.
+- Validate at boundaries, trust types inside, per the **boundary-discipline** principle skill. Business logic as pure functions. The shell stays thin.
+- Single source of truth per invariant. Derive instead of sync.
+- Idempotent state transitions where applicable, per the **make-operations-idempotent** principle skill. Ask what happens if the operation runs twice or crashes halfway.
+- Short call chains. If tracing the flow needs more than three files, flatten the hierarchy, per the **laziness-protocol** and **minimize-reader-load** principle skills.
+
+You are one of the parallel runners, each on a different model. Produce the best design your model can make. Don't hedge against the others. Differences between candidates are the signal used to pick a base and graft. Converging on a safe-looking middle defeats the exploration.

package/skills/arena/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+---
+name: arena
+description: "Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape."
+disable-model-invocation: true
+---
+
+<!-- Generated by scripts/semantics/generate.mjs; edit the source mapping/adapter, not this file. -->
+
+# Pi adapter for the pinned pstack source
+
+The behavior source is the `vendor/upstream/0.15.36/pstack/` snapshot at `c742dd61706fbacc1b95f1a20b7b988cf096ce6c`. Generated supported Skill/playbook entrypoints retain the upstream Markdown after this Pi prelude. The eleven core workflows have critical-rule mappings; preserving a source body does not prove that a model followed it. The full source inventory is pinned separately; maintainer semantic sign-off remains pending.
+
+Apply user instructions and repository authority first. Read referenced source Markdown through `pstack_skill` with `upstream/skills/<skill>/...` resource IDs, consuming every page. Statechart's 0.15.36 TypeScript runtime and its test corpus are bundled under `skills/statechart/scripts`; the older 0.15.32 `.mjs` tools are retained for compatibility. Java/TLC and optional renderers are external dependencies. Other Cursor plugins, private APIs, drivers and cloud resources are not supplied.
+
+For Statechart execution, run `node <skill-dir>/../../dist/statechart/statechart.js SPEC.tla [--config FILE] [--view FILE] [--out DIR]`. This compiled copy is required in installed packages because Node does not strip TypeScript inside `node_modules`. The upstream source and test corpus remain unchanged.
+
+## Platform substitutions
+
+- Task workers use `pstack_agents` and `pstack_workflow` Pi AgentSessions. The parent owns the playbook. Parallel writers use Git worktrees; integrated delivery uses an explicit integrator and verification. These are local processes, not cloud VMs or OS sandboxes.
+- `/setup-pstack` previews model roles and suggested panels using models visible in the current Pi session; edit only what needs changing. Existing choices are preserved. Panels with the same model in several seats do not provide model diversity. Model roles use `models.json`; pass the playbook and, for named roles such as Reflect's `tooling`, `judgment`, `divergent`, and `synthesizer`, `modelRole` when dispatching. Explicit node models take precedence.
+- Pi `thinkingLevel` replaces Cursor's reasoning slug conventions. Optional same-family fallback chooses a registered model from the same provider and reports it; a supported lower reasoning level may be used and reported. Unknown families are not guessed, Cursor `-fast` aliases are not rewritten, and authentication/inference failures are not automatically retried.
+- For an unconfigured panel, plans suggest available Pi models and disclose repeated seats. Unresolvable configured seats are dropped or replaced with an available survivor or the parent, with notes. A known-family parent gets a judge only from another recognized family; if none is available, the plan produces candidates only and the coordinator must inspect, choose, integrate and verify them. A failed or unaccepted candidate is excluded only after the other candidates settle; verified survivors remain eligible and the dropout is recorded.
+- Arena's cross-judge uses confined `pstack_candidates` access to verified worktrees. The integrator independently reads and compares candidates before selecting and grafting. Architect's template includes a separate implementation phase after the selected sketch; the coordinator still owns upstream grounding (`how`/`why`) and optional checkpoints.
+- Interrogate creates a worktree for each adversary, copies the reviewed staged, unstaged and untracked changes, and runs a separate repro-verifier on each worktree. No adversary changes are integrated. Both sessions must report command, observed and expected output; synthesis can only carry reproductions present in a verifier report. These sessions use Pi's ordinary writable-agent shell permissions; the verification-policy allowlist controls native gate commands, not their interactive shell. Model reports are not independently attested receipts: the coordinator must inspect actual command evidence and the effect of any repro edits before claiming a finding is verified.
+- Swarm supports partition, best-of, first-pass and rank-all race templates. First-pass waits for a candidate's deterministic acceptance, requests cooperative cancellation of the remaining sessions, and waits for them to settle. Rank-all reports every rank without automatically integrating a winner. Mixed partition/race still needs an explicit DAG.
+- Custom Mode maps to sticky `/poteto-mode`. `/loop` maps to `/pstack-loop`, which requires an active Pi host and cannot promise cloud-root scheduling or exact delivery across a crash.
+- Use an available named CLI/UI driver for real-surface proof. Without one, return blocked or inconclusive with the exact reason; unit tests, fake providers and worker reports cannot replace a live lane.
+
+## Explicit policy deviations
+
+- Native exact-head/base ledgers invalidate verification when either changes, including patch-preserving restacks; upstream can reuse some patch-ID-stable verdicts.
+- Read-only reviewer, scout and verifier sessions inspect confined source and evidence but cannot run shell commands or live MCP. Deterministic commands run in an authorized runner or writable lane. For external investigation, the parent supplies evidence snapshots and verifies decisive citations.
+- Autopilot templates prepare local DAG artifacts. The coordinator remains responsible for the owner lifecycle, early PRs, periodic audit, rebase discipline, countersigns and stop propagation. A stack template alone does not deliver a remote PR stack. Babysit stops at merge-ready; shipping and remote writes require the actual applicable authorization.
+- Opening a PR does not start a babysit. Finish the phase or stack before a requested babysit unless an explicitly assigned full-autonomy owner owns the loop and has reported code-ready. Babysit stops before merge; operator-reserved items never merge automatically.
+
+## Unsupported operations
+
+`Cursor-private-PR-provenance`, `Cursor-watch-READY`, `Cursor-cleanup-plugin` and `Bugbot-pass-dismissal` are unsupported. GitHub/Origin and native states are alternatives with their own evidence boundaries, not proof that a Cursor operation ran. `make-bot-ui` and the Cursor automation event pack require Cursor-specific surfaces. Report these limitations rather than marking unavailable operations complete.
+
+## Evidence boundary
+
+`SEMANTICS.json` records selected critical-rule mappings, exact source lines, deviations, bound tests and file fingerprints. Inventory counts, source hashes, deterministic checks, Pi SDK/fake-provider tests, real-model runs and maintainer semantic review are separate evidence levels. Advancing the source pin and passing CI do not establish complete Cursor/Pi equivalence or maintainer approval.
+
+
+## Pi panel execution
+
+Use `/setup-pstack` to review or change the arena panel. Unconfigured panels use disclosed session-available suggestions. Use `pstack_semantics` with action `panel` and name `arena` to resolve the configured seats against the model registry; this does not check authentication or run inference. Then use `pstack_workflow` with template.kind `arena`; it loads those seats automatically. Create the strict brief and, for arena/architect, a rubric. Plan first and inspect the resulting models. A plan or preflight does not mean execution ran. Arena/architect use one read-only cross-judge when an eligible different-family model is available. When skipped, inspect and select candidates yourself. Interrogate uses isolated adversaries and separate repro sessions; inspect their real command evidence.
+
+---
+
+## Pinned upstream instructions
+
+Source: cursor/plugins@c742dd61706fbacc1b95f1a20b7b988cf096ce6c, pstack/skills/arena/SKILL.md. The following body is retained verbatim.
+
+
+# Arena
+
+Open a todolist with one entry per phase (Frame, Fan out, Cross-judge, Pick, Graft, Verify) before launching anything.
+
+## Phase A: Frame
+
+Every candidate gets the same prompt, so the prompt is the contract.
+
+1. State the artifact each candidate is producing.
+2. Derive the rubric, 3-6 concrete gradeable criteria for what success looks like on *this* task. It is the picker's tool in Phase D. Candidates only see the task.
+3. Pick the runners. Use the `arena runners` line in `~/.cursor/rules/pstack-models.mdc`. If the rule or that line is missing, default to one each on `claude-opus-5-5-xhigh` and `grok-4.7-xhigh-fast`. An `auto` or `inherit-parent` entry in this line means the parent model, so omit `model` for it. If the Task tool rejects a configured entry, run that seat on its family's default and say so. Families go by prefix: `claude-*`, and `grok-*` with `cursor-grok-*` and `composer-*`. A refused `composer-*` entry runs on `grok-4.7-xhigh-fast`. If the family has no default, or the Task tool rejects that default, use the closest valid slug of the same family from its error message, or drop the seat and say so when there is none. If dropped seats leave fewer than two runners, add runners until there are two, or one when the line has one entry. Run each added runner on a remaining runner's model, or omit `model` so it runs on the parent model when none remain, and say so. Spawn more runners when the arena covers multiple design directions. Use the same model N times when the work is generation-bound rather than judgment-sensitive. Pick each subagent's reasoning level and fast or standard speed for the job, per the Subagents section of the **poteto-mode** skill.
+4. Give each candidate its own output location (a git worktree where possible, otherwise `/tmp/arena-<slug>/candidate-<n>/`), per the **separate-before-serializing-shared-state** principle skill.
+
+## Phase B: Fan out
+
+Spawn all N subagents in one message with `run_in_background: true`, each with the task, the path to the shared grounding, its own output path, and instructions to produce the artifact and a short rationale naming the alternatives it considered and what it rejected.
+
+If a candidate produces no output, proceed with N-1 and note the dropout.
+
+## Phase C: Cross-judge
+
+After all Phase B candidates complete, choose one model from the `arena cross-judge pool` line in `~/.cursor/rules/pstack-models.mdc`. If the rule or that line is missing, choose from `claude-opus-5-5-xhigh` and `grok-4.7-xhigh-fast`. Spawn one readonly judge subagent. The judge is never from the parent's family, as Phase A step 3 defines families. Try only the entries from another family, in pool order. An `auto` or `inherit-parent` entry is the parent model, so it never judges. With the default pool, a Claude parent gets `grok-4.7-xhigh-fast`. A parent from any other family gets `claude-opus-5-5-xhigh` first. If the Task tool rejects an entry, use a valid slug of the same model at the closest level or speed from the error message, or move to the next entry when there is none. If no entry from another family runs, try the default pool's entries from another family the same way. If none of those runs, skip the judge, pick the base alone in Phase D, and say so. If you do not know the parent's model, try the pool's real slugs in pool order and say that the family check did not run. The judge sees the rubric and the candidates by path label, scores each criterion, and recommends a base with rationale. It runs in parallel with your reading in Phase D. Don't spawn it while candidates are still writing.
+
+## Phase D: Pick a base
+
+Read every candidate end to end before picking. Score each against the rubric criterion by criterion, not on holistic feel, and compare with the cross-judge when Phase C ran one. Agreement on the base confirms the pick. Disagreement means one of you is biased or the rubric was ambiguous. Read both rationales before deciding.
+
+Pick the base a future maintainer can extend most easily without breaking invariants. When two feel tied, prefer the cleaner boundary or smaller API, per the Laziness Protocol.
+
+## Phase E: Graft
+
+Walk each losing candidate once more for what is worth porting into the base, usually one or two things per candidate, not most of it. Fold each graft in by hand, per the **redesign-from-first-principles** principle skill, so the result stays coherent under one mental model. Don't paste mechanically.
+
+If the candidates converge on one shape, that is strong agreement. Note it and ship the consensus shape. No graft is needed. If they wildly diverge, Phase A was under-specified. Reframe and re-run rather than averaging the divergence.
+
+## Phase F: Verify
+
+Verify the synthesized artifact like any other output, per the **prove-it-works** principle skill. If verification finds a problem the arena missed, either Phase A was wrong (re-frame and re-run) or a candidate caught it and you missed the graft (go back to Phase E). Don't paper over it.
+
+## Outputs
+
+One synthesized artifact, with a short synthesis note alongside naming the base and why, the cross-judge's verdict or that Phase C skipped the judge, each graft with its source candidate, what was rejected and why, any convergence or dropouts, and the verification result.
+
+
+## Pi execution tools
+
+Use `pstack_agents` for one child and `pstack_workflow` / `pstack_graph` for an explicit DAG. Roles are `architect`, `worker`, `reviewer`, `verifier`, `synthesizer` and `integrator`. Parallel writers use isolated worktrees, then an integrator. A verifier directly depends on the artifact owner. Inspect workflow status on recovery; completed nodes are not replayed. Check remote state before retrying external effects. `pstack_worktrees` cleans only owned clean worktrees.

package/skills/automate-me/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+---
+name: automate-me
+description: "Use for \"automate me\", \"create/update/refresh my -mode skill\", \"turn/capture my preferences or working style into a skill\", or wanting agents to follow how the user works. Drafts or revises a personal -mode skill via create-skill + unslop, optionally pulling fresh evidence from recent transcripts."
+disable-model-invocation: true
+---
+
+<!-- Generated by scripts/semantics/generate.mjs; edit the source mapping/adapter, not this file. -->
+
+# Pi adapter for the pinned pstack source
+
+The behavior source is the `vendor/upstream/0.15.36/pstack/` snapshot at `c742dd61706fbacc1b95f1a20b7b988cf096ce6c`. Generated supported Skill/playbook entrypoints retain the upstream Markdown after this Pi prelude. The eleven core workflows have critical-rule mappings; preserving a source body does not prove that a model followed it. The full source inventory is pinned separately; maintainer semantic sign-off remains pending.
+
+Apply user instructions and repository authority first. Read referenced source Markdown through `pstack_skill` with `upstream/skills/<skill>/...` resource IDs, consuming every page. Statechart's 0.15.36 TypeScript runtime and its test corpus are bundled under `skills/statechart/scripts`; the older 0.15.32 `.mjs` tools are retained for compatibility. Java/TLC and optional renderers are external dependencies. Other Cursor plugins, private APIs, drivers and cloud resources are not supplied.
+
+For Statechart execution, run `node <skill-dir>/../../dist/statechart/statechart.js SPEC.tla [--config FILE] [--view FILE] [--out DIR]`. This compiled copy is required in installed packages because Node does not strip TypeScript inside `node_modules`. The upstream source and test corpus remain unchanged.
+
+## Platform substitutions
+
+- Task workers use `pstack_agents` and `pstack_workflow` Pi AgentSessions. The parent owns the playbook. Parallel writers use Git worktrees; integrated delivery uses an explicit integrator and verification. These are local processes, not cloud VMs or OS sandboxes.
+- `/setup-pstack` previews model roles and suggested panels using models visible in the current Pi session; edit only what needs changing. Existing choices are preserved. Panels with the same model in several seats do not provide model diversity. Model roles use `models.json`; pass the playbook and, for named roles such as Reflect's `tooling`, `judgment`, `divergent`, and `synthesizer`, `modelRole` when dispatching. Explicit node models take precedence.
+- Pi `thinkingLevel` replaces Cursor's reasoning slug conventions. Optional same-family fallback chooses a registered model from the same provider and reports it; a supported lower reasoning level may be used and reported. Unknown families are not guessed, Cursor `-fast` aliases are not rewritten, and authentication/inference failures are not automatically retried.
+- For an unconfigured panel, plans suggest available Pi models and disclose repeated seats. Unresolvable configured seats are dropped or replaced with an available survivor or the parent, with notes. A known-family parent gets a judge only from another recognized family; if none is available, the plan produces candidates only and the coordinator must inspect, choose, integrate and verify them. A failed or unaccepted candidate is excluded only after the other candidates settle; verified survivors remain eligible and the dropout is recorded.
+- Arena's cross-judge uses confined `pstack_candidates` access to verified worktrees. The integrator independently reads and compares candidates before selecting and grafting. Architect's template includes a separate implementation phase after the selected sketch; the coordinator still owns upstream grounding (`how`/`why`) and optional checkpoints.
+- Interrogate creates a worktree for each adversary, copies the reviewed staged, unstaged and untracked changes, and runs a separate repro-verifier on each worktree. No adversary changes are integrated. Both sessions must report command, observed and expected output; synthesis can only carry reproductions present in a verifier report. These sessions use Pi's ordinary writable-agent shell permissions; the verification-policy allowlist controls native gate commands, not their interactive shell. Model reports are not independently attested receipts: the coordinator must inspect actual command evidence and the effect of any repro edits before claiming a finding is verified.
+- Swarm supports partition, best-of, first-pass and rank-all race templates. First-pass waits for a candidate's deterministic acceptance, requests cooperative cancellation of the remaining sessions, and waits for them to settle. Rank-all reports every rank without automatically integrating a winner. Mixed partition/race still needs an explicit DAG.
+- Custom Mode maps to sticky `/poteto-mode`. `/loop` maps to `/pstack-loop`, which requires an active Pi host and cannot promise cloud-root scheduling or exact delivery across a crash.
+- Use an available named CLI/UI driver for real-surface proof. Without one, return blocked or inconclusive with the exact reason; unit tests, fake providers and worker reports cannot replace a live lane.
+
+## Explicit policy deviations
+
+- Native exact-head/base ledgers invalidate verification when either changes, including patch-preserving restacks; upstream can reuse some patch-ID-stable verdicts.
+- Read-only reviewer, scout and verifier sessions inspect confined source and evidence but cannot run shell commands or live MCP. Deterministic commands run in an authorized runner or writable lane. For external investigation, the parent supplies evidence snapshots and verifies decisive citations.
+- Autopilot templates prepare local DAG artifacts. The coordinator remains responsible for the owner lifecycle, early PRs, periodic audit, rebase discipline, countersigns and stop propagation. A stack template alone does not deliver a remote PR stack. Babysit stops at merge-ready; shipping and remote writes require the actual applicable authorization.
+- Opening a PR does not start a babysit. Finish the phase or stack before a requested babysit unless an explicitly assigned full-autonomy owner owns the loop and has reported code-ready. Babysit stops before merge; operator-reserved items never merge automatically.
+
+## Unsupported operations
+
+`Cursor-private-PR-provenance`, `Cursor-watch-READY`, `Cursor-cleanup-plugin` and `Bugbot-pass-dismissal` are unsupported. GitHub/Origin and native states are alternatives with their own evidence boundaries, not proof that a Cursor operation ran. `make-bot-ui` and the Cursor automation event pack require Cursor-specific surfaces. Report these limitations rather than marking unavailable operations complete.
+
+## Evidence boundary
+
+`SEMANTICS.json` records selected critical-rule mappings, exact source lines, deviations, bound tests and file fingerprints. Inventory counts, source hashes, deterministic checks, Pi SDK/fake-provider tests, real-model runs and maintainer semantic review are separate evidence levels. Advancing the source pin and passing CI do not establish complete Cursor/Pi equivalence or maintainer approval.
+
+
+## Pi question interaction
+
+Cursor `AskQuestion` is not a Pi tool supplied by this package. Ask in chat using clearly described options and let the user reply in their own words. For multiple selections, explicitly invite any combination; do not claim a multi-select UI was shown. Preserve the user’s answers before proceeding.
+
+---
+
+## Pinned upstream instructions
+
+Source: cursor/plugins@c742dd61706fbacc1b95f1a20b7b988cf096ce6c, pstack/skills/automate-me/SKILL.md. The following body is retained verbatim.
+
+
+# Automate me
+
+A guided flow for turning the user's working conventions into a skill agents will follow. The output is one `-mode` skill tailored to them (e.g. `jay-mode`, `priya-mode`).
+
+This skill orchestrates three others: an inline mining pass (see step 1), Cursor's built-in `create-skill` (authoring), and the **unslop** skill (prose discipline). It sequences them. It doesn't replace them.
+
+## Flow
+
+### 0. Check for an existing skill
+
+Look recursively for `.cursor/skills/**/*-mode/SKILL.md` and `~/.cursor/skills/*-mode/SKILL.md` matching the user's handle. Mode skills can live in a personal category directory (`.cursor/skills/<handle>/`), not only at the top level. If one exists, confirm intent with `AskQuestion` (unless they already said "update my skill" or similar):
+
+- Update the existing skill (default for repeat runs)
+- Start fresh (rare, ask why before doing it)
+
+Update mode changes the rest of the flow:
+- Step 1 mines only history since the skill was last edited (`git log -1 --format=%cI <path>`).
+- Step 2 asks what's changed or missing, not what to capture from zero.
+- Step 4 edits the existing file in place. Preserve sections the user hasn't contradicted. Revise ones with new evidence. Add new sections only for genuinely new rules.
+
+### 1. Mine their history
+
+Locate the active workspace's transcripts before fanning out. The system prompt names the workspace's `agent-transcripts/` directory. Use only that path. Don't glob across `~/.cursor/projects/*/`. That crosses workspace boundaries and reads private chats from unrelated projects.
+
+Survey recent agent conversations within that scope for recurring patterns. Run multiple parallel subagents across slices of history (e.g. last 2-4 weeks, split into 3 slices so each has enough material). Pick each subagent's reasoning level and fast or standard speed for the job, per the Subagents section of the **poteto-mode** skill. Each slice mining subagent reads transcripts from the workspace-scoped path the parent provides, looks for the signals below, and returns a short structured list of patterns it saw with evidence pointers. Default signals worth hunting:
+
+- Response preferences (length, tone, format, "dumb it down" corrections)
+- Delegation habits (subagents, models, specialized workflows, parallelism)
+- Verification posture (what "done" means, unit tests vs live repro, reviewers)
+- Code and prose discipline (style, principles cited, lint/format tools)
+- Process conventions (worktrees, commits, PRs, review/merge tooling)
+- Meta preferences (fixing skills mid-task, proposing new ones)
+
+Cross-check across slices before elevating a signal. Patterns seen in 2+ slices are high-confidence. Lone signals are weak and usually get dropped.
+
+### 2. Ask the user directly
+
+Mining misses intent that hasn't come up yet. Use the `AskQuestion` tool (structured multi-choice) rather than asking the user to type from scratch.
+
+Shape: one or two questions with 4-6 options each, `allow_multiple: true` for category questions. Start broad ("Which areas matter most?"), then follow up on selected areas with specific options. After the structured rounds, one free-form chat question catches anything the options missed.
+
+Don't dump 20 questions.
+
+### 3. Cluster findings
+
+Group the combined signals into sections. Common ones (use only what applies):
+
+- **Response style**: length, tone, format.
+- **Autonomy**: how much to do without asking, MCP tool use.
+- **Understand first**: which skills to reach for when scoping or investigating a change.
+- **Subagents**: default, parallelism, model-to-task, specialized workflows.
+- **Prose / code discipline**: principles, lint tools, style guides.
+- **Review and verify**: repro posture, verification skills, live-testing tools.
+- **Process**: git worktrees, commits, PRs, review/merge tooling.
+- **Skills**: skill-authoring habits, fix-the-skill-first, proposing new skills.
+
+The **poteto-mode** skill shows the shape. Read it for granularity. Don't copy its content. The user's rules are not the same as poteto-mode's.
+
+### 4. Draft the skill
+
+Use Cursor's built-in `create-skill` skill to author the skill. Placement:
+
+- Path: preserve an existing mode skill's category. For a new mode, use `.cursor/skills/<handle>/<handle>-mode/SKILL.md` when the repo has an established personal category for that handle. Otherwise default to `.cursor/skills/<handle>-mode/SKILL.md` in the project (or `~/.cursor/skills/<handle>-mode/` if the user prefers a personal skill).
+- Handle: the user's first name or chosen identifier.
+- Frontmatter `description`: trigger on their name + `/<handle>-mode` + "work in their style", not on generic keywords like "write code" or "review PR".
+- Frontmatter formatting: follow `create-skill`'s YAML rules. Keep `description` as one YAML scalar. Quote it or use `description: >-` with indented continuation lines when punctuation or wrapping requires it.
+- Frontmatter `disable-model-invocation: true` by default. Opt out only if the user explicitly wants their mode to apply on every turn.
+
+### 5. Iterate on prose
+
+Apply the **unslop** skill and `create-skill`'s writing guidelines to every line.
+
+Show the draft to the user and take feedback. Expect multiple iterations. Cut ruthlessly. A mode skill is not a manual.
+
+### 6. Land it
+
+Work in a worktree off main. Commit and open a PR. Don't push to main directly.
+
+## Guardrails
+
+- **Don't overfit to one conversation.** A preference stated once and contradicted another time is noise. Require multiple instances before codifying it.
+- **Don't be clever.** Restating other skills' contents, inventing metaphors, or writing "poetic" prose for an agent reader is cost without benefit. Keep it operational.
+- **Reference, don't inline.** Other skills the user relies on should appear as path references, not pasted excerpts. Same for any principle docs they maintain elsewhere.
+- **Keep sections minimal.** Only add a section if the user has a specific, non-default rule there. "Communicate clearly" is not a section. "Short paragraphs. Tables when comparing options. Bullets only when items are genuinely parallel." is.
+- **Name conventions generic.** Use "the user" or "the human" in imperatives, not the author's first name.
+- **Don't force symmetry.** If a user has no process rules worth writing down, skip the Process section entirely.
+
+## Evaluation
+
+A `-mode` skill is subjective output. A `create-skill`-style test/iterate benchmark loop isn't useful here. Vibe-check with the user: does it read like them? Did it miss anything? Then ship.
+
+Run a description-optimization loop only if the skill's trigger accuracy turns out to be a problem in practice.
+
+## When not to use
+
+- User wants a task-specific skill (not working conventions): `create-skill` alone, no mining required.
+- User wants to capture one narrow workflow (e.g. "how I write commit messages"). That's a regular skill, not a mode skill.
+
+
+
+## Pi execution tools
+
+Use `pstack_agents` for one child and `pstack_workflow` / `pstack_graph` for an explicit DAG. Roles are `architect`, `worker`, `reviewer`, `verifier`, `synthesizer` and `integrator`. Parallel writers use isolated worktrees, then an integrator. A verifier directly depends on the artifact owner. Inspect workflow status on recovery; completed nodes are not replayed. Check remote state before retrying external effects. `pstack_worktrees` cleans only owned clean worktrees.

package/skills/benchmark-checklist/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+---
+name: benchmark-checklist
+description: "Vet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it. Use when you run a benchmark or report a speedup or regression you measured."
+disable-model-invocation: true
+---
+
+<!-- Generated by scripts/semantics/generate.mjs; edit the source mapping/adapter, not this file. -->
+
+# Pi adapter for the pinned pstack source
+
+The behavior source is the `vendor/upstream/0.15.36/pstack/` snapshot at `c742dd61706fbacc1b95f1a20b7b988cf096ce6c`. Generated supported Skill/playbook entrypoints retain the upstream Markdown after this Pi prelude. The eleven core workflows have critical-rule mappings; preserving a source body does not prove that a model followed it. The full source inventory is pinned separately; maintainer semantic sign-off remains pending.
+
+Apply user instructions and repository authority first. Read referenced source Markdown through `pstack_skill` with `upstream/skills/<skill>/...` resource IDs, consuming every page. Statechart's 0.15.36 TypeScript runtime and its test corpus are bundled under `skills/statechart/scripts`; the older 0.15.32 `.mjs` tools are retained for compatibility. Java/TLC and optional renderers are external dependencies. Other Cursor plugins, private APIs, drivers and cloud resources are not supplied.
+
+For Statechart execution, run `node <skill-dir>/../../dist/statechart/statechart.js SPEC.tla [--config FILE] [--view FILE] [--out DIR]`. This compiled copy is required in installed packages because Node does not strip TypeScript inside `node_modules`. The upstream source and test corpus remain unchanged.
+
+## Platform substitutions
+
+- Task workers use `pstack_agents` and `pstack_workflow` Pi AgentSessions. The parent owns the playbook. Parallel writers use Git worktrees; integrated delivery uses an explicit integrator and verification. These are local processes, not cloud VMs or OS sandboxes.
+- `/setup-pstack` previews model roles and suggested panels using models visible in the current Pi session; edit only what needs changing. Existing choices are preserved. Panels with the same model in several seats do not provide model diversity. Model roles use `models.json`; pass the playbook and, for named roles such as Reflect's `tooling`, `judgment`, `divergent`, and `synthesizer`, `modelRole` when dispatching. Explicit node models take precedence.
+- Pi `thinkingLevel` replaces Cursor's reasoning slug conventions. Optional same-family fallback chooses a registered model from the same provider and reports it; a supported lower reasoning level may be used and reported. Unknown families are not guessed, Cursor `-fast` aliases are not rewritten, and authentication/inference failures are not automatically retried.
+- For an unconfigured panel, plans suggest available Pi models and disclose repeated seats. Unresolvable configured seats are dropped or replaced with an available survivor or the parent, with notes. A known-family parent gets a judge only from another recognized family; if none is available, the plan produces candidates only and the coordinator must inspect, choose, integrate and verify them. A failed or unaccepted candidate is excluded only after the other candidates settle; verified survivors remain eligible and the dropout is recorded.
+- Arena's cross-judge uses confined `pstack_candidates` access to verified worktrees. The integrator independently reads and compares candidates before selecting and grafting. Architect's template includes a separate implementation phase after the selected sketch; the coordinator still owns upstream grounding (`how`/`why`) and optional checkpoints.
+- Interrogate creates a worktree for each adversary, copies the reviewed staged, unstaged and untracked changes, and runs a separate repro-verifier on each worktree. No adversary changes are integrated. Both sessions must report command, observed and expected output; synthesis can only carry reproductions present in a verifier report. These sessions use Pi's ordinary writable-agent shell permissions; the verification-policy allowlist controls native gate commands, not their interactive shell. Model reports are not independently attested receipts: the coordinator must inspect actual command evidence and the effect of any repro edits before claiming a finding is verified.
+- Swarm supports partition, best-of, first-pass and rank-all race templates. First-pass waits for a candidate's deterministic acceptance, requests cooperative cancellation of the remaining sessions, and waits for them to settle. Rank-all reports every rank without automatically integrating a winner. Mixed partition/race still needs an explicit DAG.
+- Custom Mode maps to sticky `/poteto-mode`. `/loop` maps to `/pstack-loop`, which requires an active Pi host and cannot promise cloud-root scheduling or exact delivery across a crash.
+- Use an available named CLI/UI driver for real-surface proof. Without one, return blocked or inconclusive with the exact reason; unit tests, fake providers and worker reports cannot replace a live lane.
+
+## Explicit policy deviations
+
+- Native exact-head/base ledgers invalidate verification when either changes, including patch-preserving restacks; upstream can reuse some patch-ID-stable verdicts.
+- Read-only reviewer, scout and verifier sessions inspect confined source and evidence but cannot run shell commands or live MCP. Deterministic commands run in an authorized runner or writable lane. For external investigation, the parent supplies evidence snapshots and verifies decisive citations.
+- Autopilot templates prepare local DAG artifacts. The coordinator remains responsible for the owner lifecycle, early PRs, periodic audit, rebase discipline, countersigns and stop propagation. A stack template alone does not deliver a remote PR stack. Babysit stops at merge-ready; shipping and remote writes require the actual applicable authorization.
+- Opening a PR does not start a babysit. Finish the phase or stack before a requested babysit unless an explicitly assigned full-autonomy owner owns the loop and has reported code-ready. Babysit stops before merge; operator-reserved items never merge automatically.
+
+## Unsupported operations
+
+`Cursor-private-PR-provenance`, `Cursor-watch-READY`, `Cursor-cleanup-plugin` and `Bugbot-pass-dismissal` are unsupported. GitHub/Origin and native states are alternatives with their own evidence boundaries, not proof that a Cursor operation ran. `make-bot-ui` and the Cursor automation event pack require Cursor-specific surfaces. Report these limitations rather than marking unavailable operations complete.
+
+## Evidence boundary
+
+`SEMANTICS.json` records selected critical-rule mappings, exact source lines, deviations, bound tests and file fingerprints. Inventory counts, source hashes, deterministic checks, Pi SDK/fake-provider tests, real-model runs and maintainer semantic review are separate evidence levels. Advancing the source pin and passing CI do not establish complete Cursor/Pi equivalence or maintainer approval.
+
+
+---
+
+## Pinned upstream instructions
+
+Source: cursor/plugins@c742dd61706fbacc1b95f1a20b7b988cf096ce6c, pstack/skills/benchmark-checklist/SKILL.md. The following body is retained verbatim.
+
+
+# Benchmark checklist
+
+Use this when you produce a performance number: a PR's before and after, a regression claim, a hillclimb harness, or a library or config choice. Answer each question with evidence from a run, not a guess about the code.
+
+For a quick ballpark the user asked for, one run is enough. Still check questions 4 and 7, and say that it is one run. Skip the rest unless that run looks wrong. A choice between options is never a ballpark.
+
+## Before you run anything
+
+- Write down the claim you expect to make, in the words you would ship ("export is 30% faster at p50 on the 60k-row dataset"). The questions test that sentence.
+- Read the measurement script. Note what it times, counts, and ignores.
+- Check the load average with `uptime` and the core count with `nproc`. If the machine is busy, find out what is running. If you cannot stop it, interleave the sides so both see the same noise, and say so in the report.
+
+## The questions
+
+1. **Why not double?** Name the limiter. Profile in a run you do not report, because profilers and tracers slow the work down. Use CPU per process (`top`, `pidstat`), a runtime profiler (`node --cpu-prof`, `py-spy`, `perf`), I/O wait, and syscall counts (`strace -c` on Linux), then map the hot spot to source. Watch the load generator too: if it saturates first, you measured the load generator. If a change did not move the number, the limiter explains why, so find it before you call the change useless.
+2. **Was it tuned?** Run every side the way production runs it: release builds, production flags and env, batching and transaction settings, connection pools, caches as warm or cold as production sees them, and the same versions and data. If one side runs on defaults, you compared configurations, not implementations. A limiter that is a setting (a commit per row, a debug build, a missing index) means that side is untuned. Tune it and measure again before you pick a winner. If you cannot tune it, do not pick a winner from that run. When the user is choosing what to adopt, narrowing the claim to the code as it ships today does not fix this, because they adopt the option, not today's settings.
+3. **Did it break limits?** Do the arithmetic. Compare bytes per second with disk and network bandwidth, operations per second times cost per operation with your cores, and the time saved with the time the changed piece took. Removing a piece that takes 10% of the run can make the run at most about 11% faster. A result past a limit measured something other than the work, such as a cache, a no-op, or a bug.
+4. **Did it error?** Count failures and non-success responses, and check that outputs are correct, not just present. Rejections are often fast, and timeouts and retries are slow. If the script does not count errors, add the count.
+5. **Does it reproduce?** Run each side at least 5 times, alternating (A, B, A, B, and so on) so warmup, lazy initialization, caches, and drift favor neither. Report the median and range. A gap smaller than the run-to-run variation is no measurable difference. When the call is close, use a rank-sum test or the harness's own statistics.
+6. **Does it matter?** Next to any micro result, measure the end-to-end path a user waits on, with realistic data sizes and concurrency, and report the micro result as a share of the whole. A helper that takes 1% of a request can make the request at most 1% faster, however fast the helper gets.
+7. **Did it even happen?** Confirm the work ran inside the timed region: the request reached the server, the rows were written, the bytes were read, and the code used the result. Lazy code (generators nobody iterates, promises nobody awaits, results the JIT can discard) and timeouts produce numbers for work that never happened.
+
+## Report
+
+- Lead with the verdict: faster, slower, no measurable difference, or inconclusive.
+- Give the number with its unit, the run count, the range, and the limiter. For example, "p50 41 ms → 33 ms, median of 7 runs per side, range 32 to 35 ms after, bound by JSON parsing on one core."
+- Call the verdict inconclusive when you claim a difference but cannot name the limiter, when a side ran untuned, or when you could not check questions 4 and 7. Name the gap.
+- Keep a PR body to one primary number, per the **Opening a PR** playbook. Put the runs, range, and limiter evidence in a linked artifact or notes file.
+
+## Other perf material
+
+- Vet the **Perf issue** playbook's baseline before the playbook plans from it, and every number after that.
+- Vet the **Hillclimb** playbook's harness before it is frozen. The frozen harness then prints error and work counts, so each keep-or-revert checks questions 4 and 7 for free.
+
+
+## Pi execution tools
+
+Use `pstack_agents` for one child and `pstack_workflow` / `pstack_graph` for an explicit DAG. Roles are `architect`, `worker`, `reviewer`, `verifier`, `synthesizer` and `integrator`. Parallel writers use isolated worktrees, then an integrator. A verifier directly depends on the artifact owner. Inspect workflow status on recovery; completed nodes are not replayed. Check remote state before retrying external effects. `pstack_worktrees` cleans only owned clean worktrees.

package/skills/blast-radius/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+---
+name: blast-radius
+description: "Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust."
+disable-model-invocation: true
+---
+
+<!-- Generated by scripts/semantics/generate.mjs; edit the source mapping/adapter, not this file. -->
+
+# Pi adapter for the pinned pstack source
+
+The behavior source is the `vendor/upstream/0.15.36/pstack/` snapshot at `c742dd61706fbacc1b95f1a20b7b988cf096ce6c`. Generated supported Skill/playbook entrypoints retain the upstream Markdown after this Pi prelude. The eleven core workflows have critical-rule mappings; preserving a source body does not prove that a model followed it. The full source inventory is pinned separately; maintainer semantic sign-off remains pending.
+
+Apply user instructions and repository authority first. Read referenced source Markdown through `pstack_skill` with `upstream/skills/<skill>/...` resource IDs, consuming every page. Statechart's 0.15.36 TypeScript runtime and its test corpus are bundled under `skills/statechart/scripts`; the older 0.15.32 `.mjs` tools are retained for compatibility. Java/TLC and optional renderers are external dependencies. Other Cursor plugins, private APIs, drivers and cloud resources are not supplied.
+
+For Statechart execution, run `node <skill-dir>/../../dist/statechart/statechart.js SPEC.tla [--config FILE] [--view FILE] [--out DIR]`. This compiled copy is required in installed packages because Node does not strip TypeScript inside `node_modules`. The upstream source and test corpus remain unchanged.
+
+## Platform substitutions
+
+- Task workers use `pstack_agents` and `pstack_workflow` Pi AgentSessions. The parent owns the playbook. Parallel writers use Git worktrees; integrated delivery uses an explicit integrator and verification. These are local processes, not cloud VMs or OS sandboxes.
+- `/setup-pstack` previews model roles and suggested panels using models visible in the current Pi session; edit only what needs changing. Existing choices are preserved. Panels with the same model in several seats do not provide model diversity. Model roles use `models.json`; pass the playbook and, for named roles such as Reflect's `tooling`, `judgment`, `divergent`, and `synthesizer`, `modelRole` when dispatching. Explicit node models take precedence.
+- Pi `thinkingLevel` replaces Cursor's reasoning slug conventions. Optional same-family fallback chooses a registered model from the same provider and reports it; a supported lower reasoning level may be used and reported. Unknown families are not guessed, Cursor `-fast` aliases are not rewritten, and authentication/inference failures are not automatically retried.
+- For an unconfigured panel, plans suggest available Pi models and disclose repeated seats. Unresolvable configured seats are dropped or replaced with an available survivor or the parent, with notes. A known-family parent gets a judge only from another recognized family; if none is available, the plan produces candidates only and the coordinator must inspect, choose, integrate and verify them. A failed or unaccepted candidate is excluded only after the other candidates settle; verified survivors remain eligible and the dropout is recorded.
+- Arena's cross-judge uses confined `pstack_candidates` access to verified worktrees. The integrator independently reads and compares candidates before selecting and grafting. Architect's template includes a separate implementation phase after the selected sketch; the coordinator still owns upstream grounding (`how`/`why`) and optional checkpoints.
+- Interrogate creates a worktree for each adversary, copies the reviewed staged, unstaged and untracked changes, and runs a separate repro-verifier on each worktree. No adversary changes are integrated. Both sessions must report command, observed and expected output; synthesis can only carry reproductions present in a verifier report. These sessions use Pi's ordinary writable-agent shell permissions; the verification-policy allowlist controls native gate commands, not their interactive shell. Model reports are not independently attested receipts: the coordinator must inspect actual command evidence and the effect of any repro edits before claiming a finding is verified.
+- Swarm supports partition, best-of, first-pass and rank-all race templates. First-pass waits for a candidate's deterministic acceptance, requests cooperative cancellation of the remaining sessions, and waits for them to settle. Rank-all reports every rank without automatically integrating a winner. Mixed partition/race still needs an explicit DAG.
+- Custom Mode maps to sticky `/poteto-mode`. `/loop` maps to `/pstack-loop`, which requires an active Pi host and cannot promise cloud-root scheduling or exact delivery across a crash.
+- Use an available named CLI/UI driver for real-surface proof. Without one, return blocked or inconclusive with the exact reason; unit tests, fake providers and worker reports cannot replace a live lane.
+
+## Explicit policy deviations
+
+- Native exact-head/base ledgers invalidate verification when either changes, including patch-preserving restacks; upstream can reuse some patch-ID-stable verdicts.
+- Read-only reviewer, scout and verifier sessions inspect confined source and evidence but cannot run shell commands or live MCP. Deterministic commands run in an authorized runner or writable lane. For external investigation, the parent supplies evidence snapshots and verifies decisive citations.
+- Autopilot templates prepare local DAG artifacts. The coordinator remains responsible for the owner lifecycle, early PRs, periodic audit, rebase discipline, countersigns and stop propagation. A stack template alone does not deliver a remote PR stack. Babysit stops at merge-ready; shipping and remote writes require the actual applicable authorization.
+- Opening a PR does not start a babysit. Finish the phase or stack before a requested babysit unless an explicitly assigned full-autonomy owner owns the loop and has reported code-ready. Babysit stops before merge; operator-reserved items never merge automatically.
+
+## Unsupported operations
+
+`Cursor-private-PR-provenance`, `Cursor-watch-READY`, `Cursor-cleanup-plugin` and `Bugbot-pass-dismissal` are unsupported. GitHub/Origin and native states are alternatives with their own evidence boundaries, not proof that a Cursor operation ran. `make-bot-ui` and the Cursor automation event pack require Cursor-specific surfaces. Report these limitations rather than marking unavailable operations complete.
+
+## Evidence boundary
+
+`SEMANTICS.json` records selected critical-rule mappings, exact source lines, deviations, bound tests and file fingerprints. Inventory counts, source hashes, deterministic checks, Pi SDK/fake-provider tests, real-model runs and maintainer semantic review are separate evidence levels. Advancing the source pin and passing CI do not establish complete Cursor/Pi equivalence or maintainer approval.
+
+
+---
+
+## Pinned upstream instructions
+
+Source: cursor/plugins@c742dd61706fbacc1b95f1a20b7b988cf096ce6c, pstack/skills/blast-radius/SKILL.md. The following body is retained verbatim.
+
+
+# Blast radius
+
+Find what a change breaks somewhere else, before it ships. Use for "blast radius of X", "what could this break", or reviewing a small diff you don't trust yet.
+
+Companion to `how` and `why`. `how` tells you what the code does. `why` tells you why it's shaped that way. Blast radius tells you what it breaks somewhere else.
+
+Listing the callers is not the job. The agent can grep those in a second. The job is the breakage grep won't show you.
+
+## Don't trust your own writeup
+
+A blast-radius writeup that sounds right is worthless. It reads as convincing whether or not it's true. So don't hand back the writeup. Find the one or two facts the whole thing depends on and prove them by running code.
+
+### How sure are you
+
+For each fact the change's safety depends on, get it as far down this list as is cheap, and say where it stopped.
+
+1. You said so. Worthless on its own.
+2. You pointed at the line. A real `file:line`, or the library's own source.
+3. You showed the bad case can't happen. You walked the failure step by step and it doesn't reach.
+4. You ran it. A script or test that calls the real code and fails loud if you're wrong.
+5. You reproduced it in the running app.
+
+Step 4 is usually one small script that imports the same library the app ships and calls the exact function you're worried about.
+
+## Steps
+
+1. Read the change. The diff, the symbols it adds, changes, and deletes, and what it now does differently, including the part the diff doesn't spell out. Use `why` step 2 to pull the PR and commits.
+2. Find the one fact it's safe because of. Most changes that look risky are safe because of a single fact, like "this call only drops already-dead cache entries and does nothing else". Find that fact. If it holds, most risky cases are cleared at once. Spend your time here, not on a long list of maybes.
+3. Look where grep stops. Read the source of the library you call, and check its pinned version and any local patch. Work out when things run: microtasks, unmount and teardown, Solid versus React. Follow what a symbol search misses: the JSON an API returns, a DB column, a wire format, another language reading the same bytes, a feature flag, code three hops downstream.
+4. Be honest about each risk. Give it a real chance of happening and a real cost if it does. Keep the risks you confirmed. List the ones you checked and cleared separately. Same rules as `why`. Cite a real `file:line`, a search that finds nothing is still an answer, and never make up a caller or an API.
+5. Prove the one fact. Write a script or test that runs the real code, run it, and paste what happened.
+6. For a big or wide change, run it as an `arena`. Ask more than one model the same question and merge the answers. Different models catch different real bugs.
+
+## What to hand back
+
+- **What it does.** What changed, including the part that isn't obvious.
+- **The one fact it's safe because of.** State it, say which step you got it to, and show the proof. If you couldn't prove it, write unproven.
+- **Risks.** Each names how it breaks, the `file:line`, how likely and how bad, and how to check. Paste the proof for the ones that matter.
+- **Cleared.** What you checked and why it's fine.
+- **Before you merge.** The cheapest test or repro that catches the real bug, including the script you wrote.
+
+Write it through `unslop`, cite real code, and strip anything private before it goes anywhere public.
+
+**Reply:** the writeup above, with the one safety fact either proven or marked unproven.
+
+
+## Pi execution tools
+
+Use `pstack_agents` for one child and `pstack_workflow` / `pstack_graph` for an explicit DAG. Roles are `architect`, `worker`, `reviewer`, `verifier`, `synthesizer` and `integrator`. Parallel writers use isolated worktrees, then an integrator. A verifier directly depends on the artifact owner. Inspect workflow status on recovery; completed nodes are not replayed. Check remote state before retrying external effects. `pstack_worktrees` cleans only owned clean worktrees.

package/skills/bro/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+---
+name: bro
+description: Restate the last message in plain human language, with no jargon.
+disable-model-invocation: true
+---
+
+<!-- Generated by scripts/semantics/generate.mjs; edit the source mapping/adapter, not this file. -->
+
+# Pi adapter for the pinned pstack source
+
+The behavior source is the `vendor/upstream/0.15.36/pstack/` snapshot at `c742dd61706fbacc1b95f1a20b7b988cf096ce6c`. Generated supported Skill/playbook entrypoints retain the upstream Markdown after this Pi prelude. The eleven core workflows have critical-rule mappings; preserving a source body does not prove that a model followed it. The full source inventory is pinned separately; maintainer semantic sign-off remains pending.
+
+Apply user instructions and repository authority first. Read referenced source Markdown through `pstack_skill` with `upstream/skills/<skill>/...` resource IDs, consuming every page. Statechart's 0.15.36 TypeScript runtime and its test corpus are bundled under `skills/statechart/scripts`; the older 0.15.32 `.mjs` tools are retained for compatibility. Java/TLC and optional renderers are external dependencies. Other Cursor plugins, private APIs, drivers and cloud resources are not supplied.
+
+For Statechart execution, run `node <skill-dir>/../../dist/statechart/statechart.js SPEC.tla [--config FILE] [--view FILE] [--out DIR]`. This compiled copy is required in installed packages because Node does not strip TypeScript inside `node_modules`. The upstream source and test corpus remain unchanged.
+
+## Platform substitutions
+
+- Task workers use `pstack_agents` and `pstack_workflow` Pi AgentSessions. The parent owns the playbook. Parallel writers use Git worktrees; integrated delivery uses an explicit integrator and verification. These are local processes, not cloud VMs or OS sandboxes.
+- `/setup-pstack` previews model roles and suggested panels using models visible in the current Pi session; edit only what needs changing. Existing choices are preserved. Panels with the same model in several seats do not provide model diversity. Model roles use `models.json`; pass the playbook and, for named roles such as Reflect's `tooling`, `judgment`, `divergent`, and `synthesizer`, `modelRole` when dispatching. Explicit node models take precedence.
+- Pi `thinkingLevel` replaces Cursor's reasoning slug conventions. Optional same-family fallback chooses a registered model from the same provider and reports it; a supported lower reasoning level may be used and reported. Unknown families are not guessed, Cursor `-fast` aliases are not rewritten, and authentication/inference failures are not automatically retried.
+- For an unconfigured panel, plans suggest available Pi models and disclose repeated seats. Unresolvable configured seats are dropped or replaced with an available survivor or the parent, with notes. A known-family parent gets a judge only from another recognized family; if none is available, the plan produces candidates only and the coordinator must inspect, choose, integrate and verify them. A failed or unaccepted candidate is excluded only after the other candidates settle; verified survivors remain eligible and the dropout is recorded.
+- Arena's cross-judge uses confined `pstack_candidates` access to verified worktrees. The integrator independently reads and compares candidates before selecting and grafting. Architect's template includes a separate implementation phase after the selected sketch; the coordinator still owns upstream grounding (`how`/`why`) and optional checkpoints.
+- Interrogate creates a worktree for each adversary, copies the reviewed staged, unstaged and untracked changes, and runs a separate repro-verifier on each worktree. No adversary changes are integrated. Both sessions must report command, observed and expected output; synthesis can only carry reproductions present in a verifier report. These sessions use Pi's ordinary writable-agent shell permissions; the verification-policy allowlist controls native gate commands, not their interactive shell. Model reports are not independently attested receipts: the coordinator must inspect actual command evidence and the effect of any repro edits before claiming a finding is verified.
+- Swarm supports partition, best-of, first-pass and rank-all race templates. First-pass waits for a candidate's deterministic acceptance, requests cooperative cancellation of the remaining sessions, and waits for them to settle. Rank-all reports every rank without automatically integrating a winner. Mixed partition/race still needs an explicit DAG.
+- Custom Mode maps to sticky `/poteto-mode`. `/loop` maps to `/pstack-loop`, which requires an active Pi host and cannot promise cloud-root scheduling or exact delivery across a crash.
+- Use an available named CLI/UI driver for real-surface proof. Without one, return blocked or inconclusive with the exact reason; unit tests, fake providers and worker reports cannot replace a live lane.
+
+## Explicit policy deviations
+
+- Native exact-head/base ledgers invalidate verification when either changes, including patch-preserving restacks; upstream can reuse some patch-ID-stable verdicts.
+- Read-only reviewer, scout and verifier sessions inspect confined source and evidence but cannot run shell commands or live MCP. Deterministic commands run in an authorized runner or writable lane. For external investigation, the parent supplies evidence snapshots and verifies decisive citations.
+- Autopilot templates prepare local DAG artifacts. The coordinator remains responsible for the owner lifecycle, early PRs, periodic audit, rebase discipline, countersigns and stop propagation. A stack template alone does not deliver a remote PR stack. Babysit stops at merge-ready; shipping and remote writes require the actual applicable authorization.
+- Opening a PR does not start a babysit. Finish the phase or stack before a requested babysit unless an explicitly assigned full-autonomy owner owns the loop and has reported code-ready. Babysit stops before merge; operator-reserved items never merge automatically.
+
+## Unsupported operations
+
+`Cursor-private-PR-provenance`, `Cursor-watch-READY`, `Cursor-cleanup-plugin` and `Bugbot-pass-dismissal` are unsupported. GitHub/Origin and native states are alternatives with their own evidence boundaries, not proof that a Cursor operation ran. `make-bot-ui` and the Cursor automation event pack require Cursor-specific surfaces. Report these limitations rather than marking unavailable operations complete.
+
+## Evidence boundary
+
+`SEMANTICS.json` records selected critical-rule mappings, exact source lines, deviations, bound tests and file fingerprints. Inventory counts, source hashes, deterministic checks, Pi SDK/fake-provider tests, real-model runs and maintainer semantic review are separate evidence levels. Advancing the source pin and passing CI do not establish complete Cursor/Pi equivalence or maintainer approval.
+
+
+---
+
+## Pinned upstream instructions
+
+Source: cursor/plugins@c742dd61706fbacc1b95f1a20b7b988cf096ce6c, pstack/skills/bro/SKILL.md. The following body is retained verbatim.
+
+
+Restate your last message. Stop using jargon and speak coherently. State it more simply and concisely, like one human talking to another.
+
+
+## Pi execution tools
+
+Use `pstack_agents` for one child and `pstack_workflow` / `pstack_graph` for an explicit DAG. Roles are `architect`, `worker`, `reviewer`, `verifier`, `synthesizer` and `integrator`. Parallel writers use isolated worktrees, then an integrator. A verifier directly depends on the artifact owner. Inspect workflow status on recovery; completed nodes are not replayed. Check remote state before retrying external effects. `pstack_worktrees` cleans only owned clean worktrees.