peaks-loop 4.0.0-beta → 4.0.0-beta.3

package/dist/src/services/crystallization/evidence-brief-builder.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
+import { z } from "zod";
+import { type EvidenceBrief } from "./crystallization-types.js";
+/**
+ * EvidenceBriefBuilder — spec §4.7 / §10 RL-7.
+ *
+ * The brief is a 4-section natural-language projection that MUST
+ * accompany every user-facing recommendation. The shape guard is
+ * encoded in `EvidenceBriefSchema` (see crystallization-types.ts);
+ * this module is the LLM-side entry point that PRODUCES the brief
+ * from a finished trace + evaluator summary and the validator that
+ * REFUSES to render a recommendation payload without all 4 sections.
+ *
+ * Hard rules (mirrored from spec):
+ *
+ *   1. Every section must be a non-empty NL string (1-2 sentences
+ *      for what_happened / why_it_matters / what_learned; 1
+ *      sentence for what_action). An empty section is a hard
+ *      `MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION` error.
+ *
+ *   2. The build path is lenient on raw prose and strict on the
+ *      final shape — `buildEvidenceBrief` calls
+ *      `EvidenceBriefSchema.parse(...)` so a partial brief throws
+ *      before reaching the database.
+ *
+ *   3. `renderRecommendationPayload` refuses to return a
+ *      recommendation envelope unless the brief passes the 4-section
+ *      guard. This is the CLI's single source of truth for "may I
+ *      show this to the user?".
+ *
+ *   4. The `evaluator_summary` is a separate field on the
+ *      crystallization_event row (spec §4.5) and is NOT part of the
+ *      brief. It feeds the broader recommendation envelope.
+ *
+ * Out of scope (deferred to later slices):
+ *   - LLM-authored brief generation from live trace evidence (M8 dogfood).
+ *   - brief rewrite-on-update semantics.
+ */
+/**
+ * The minimum viable trace shape that the builder needs to render
+ * a brief. The trace is the EVIDENCE; the builder is format-stable
+ * so a future slice can swap in a richer trace source without
+ * editing every caller.
+ */
+export declare const BriefTraceInputSchema: z.ZodObject<{
+    trace_id: z.ZodString;
+    /**
+     * The full NL recap of the run. Required for what_happened.
+     * 1-2 sentences is the spec guidance; the builder does not
+     * truncate, but tests passing multi-paragraph input will be
+     * warned at the Zod boundary (max 4000 chars per section).
+     */
+    what_happened: z.ZodString;
+    /**
+     * The "why this matters" recap. Required for why_it_matters.
+     */
+    why_it_matters: z.ZodString;
+    /**
+     * Failure-mode and preference-extraction recap. Required for
+     * what_learned.
+     */
+    what_learned: z.ZodString;
+    /**
+     * The recommended action. Required for what_action (1
+     * sentence per spec).
+     */
+    what_action: z.ZodString;
+    /**
+     * Optional structured bullets (e.g. "4 phases, 3 gates passed,
+     * 1 evaluator verdict"). Counts are allowed at this layer; the
+     * brief section is the NL primary (RL-7).
+     */
+    bullets: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString, "many">>;
+    /**
+     * Source trace ids backing the brief (the column on
+     * crystallization_event spec §4.5).
+     */
+    source_trace_pointers: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString, "many">>;
+}, "strip", z.ZodTypeAny, {
+    source_trace_pointers: string[];
+    what_happened: string;
+    why_it_matters: string;
+    what_learned: string;
+    what_action: string;
+    trace_id: string;
+    bullets: string[];
+}, {
+    what_happened: string;
+    why_it_matters: string;
+    what_learned: string;
+    what_action: string;
+    trace_id: string;
+    source_trace_pointers?: string[] | undefined;
+    bullets?: string[] | undefined;
+}>;
+export type BriefTraceInput = z.input<typeof BriefTraceInputSchema>;
+/**
+ * The summary emitted by the independent evaluators (spec §4.5
+ * `evaluator_summary` field). Optional for the brief builder — the
+ * brief can be built without it, but a filled evaluator_summary
+ * flows into the recommendation envelope.
+ */
+export declare const EvaluatorSummarySchema: z.ZodObject<{
+    one_liner: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodString>;
+    risk_tags: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString, "many">>;
+}, "strip", z.ZodTypeAny, {
+    one_liner: string;
+    risk_tags: string[];
+}, {
+    one_liner?: string | undefined;
+    risk_tags?: string[] | undefined;
+}>;
+export type EvaluatorSummary = z.input<typeof EvaluatorSummarySchema>;
+export declare const RecommendationPayloadSchema: z.ZodObject<{
+    brief: z.ZodEffects<z.ZodObject<{
+        what_happened: z.ZodString;
+        why_it_matters: z.ZodString;
+        what_learned: z.ZodString;
+        what_action: z.ZodString;
+    }, "strict", z.ZodTypeAny, {
+        what_happened: string;
+        why_it_matters: string;
+        what_learned: string;
+        what_action: string;
+    }, {
+        what_happened: string;
+        why_it_matters: string;
+        what_learned: string;
+        what_action: string;
+    }>, {
+        what_happened: string;
+        why_it_matters: string;
+        what_learned: string;
+        what_action: string;
+    }, {
+        what_happened: string;
+        why_it_matters: string;
+        what_learned: string;
+        what_action: string;
+    }>;
+    bullets: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString, "many">>;
+    source_trace_pointers: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString, "many">>;
+    evaluator_summary: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodObject<{
+        one_liner: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodString>;
+        risk_tags: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString, "many">>;
+    }, "strip", z.ZodTypeAny, {
+        one_liner: string;
+        risk_tags: string[];
+    }, {
+        one_liner?: string | undefined;
+        risk_tags?: string[] | undefined;
+    }>>;
+}, "strip", z.ZodTypeAny, {
+    source_trace_pointers: string[];
+    evaluator_summary: {
+        one_liner: string;
+        risk_tags: string[];
+    };
+    bullets: string[];
+    brief: {
+        what_happened: string;
+        why_it_matters: string;
+        what_learned: string;
+        what_action: string;
+    };
+}, {
+    brief: {
+        what_happened: string;
+        why_it_matters: string;
+        what_learned: string;
+        what_action: string;
+    };
+    source_trace_pointers?: string[] | undefined;
+    evaluator_summary?: {
+        one_liner?: string | undefined;
+        risk_tags?: string[] | undefined;
+    } | undefined;
+    bullets?: string[] | undefined;
+}>;
+export type RecommendationPayload = z.infer<typeof RecommendationPayloadSchema>;
+export declare class BriefSectionError extends Error {
+    readonly code: "MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION";
+    readonly findings: ReadonlyArray<{
+        path: string;
+        message: string;
+    }>;
+    constructor(message: string, findings?: ReadonlyArray<{
+        path: string;
+        message: string;
+    }>);
+}
+/**
+ * Build a 4-section EvidenceBrief from a finished trace recap.
+ *
+ * The function is STRICT: it parses the input trace through
+ * `BriefTraceInputSchema`, then parses the assembled brief through
+ * `EvidenceBriefSchema`. Any missing section throws
+ * `BriefSectionError(MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION)` — the same code that
+ * `safeParseEvidenceBrief` returns — so a single error code is the
+ * user-facing signal for "brief incomplete, do not render".
+ *
+ * Brief-section related ZodErrors (e.g. `min(1)` on a section) are
+ * translated to `BriefSectionError` so callers only handle one
+ * shape of failure. Non-section ZodErrors (e.g. invalid `trace_id`)
+ * are re-raised unchanged.
+ *
+ * NOTE: callers who already have raw NL strings can also call
+ * `parseEvidenceBrief` directly; this function is the opinionated
+ * shape for trace -> brief.
+ */
+export declare function buildEvidenceBrief(trace: BriefTraceInput, evaluatorSummary?: EvaluatorSummary): EvidenceBrief;
+/**
+ * Render the user-facing recommendation envelope (brief + bullets +
+ * trace pointers + evaluator summary). The function refuses to
+ * return a payload unless ALL 4 brief sections are present — this
+ * is the single CLI-facing gate per spec §10 RL-7.
+ *
+ * On success, returns the validated `RecommendationPayload`. On a
+ * missing-section brief, throws `BriefSectionError`.
+ */
+export declare function renderRecommendationPayload(trace: BriefTraceInput, evaluatorSummary?: EvaluatorSummary): RecommendationPayload;
+/**
+ * Convenience: validate an arbitrary unknown payload AS IF it were a
+ * recommendation envelope. Returns a Result-like shape so the CLI can
+ * render a structured MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION error without try/catch
+ * noise.
+ */
+export declare function safeRenderRecommendationPayload(input: unknown): {
+    ok: true;
+    payload: RecommendationPayload;
+} | {
+    ok: false;
+    code?: "MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION";
+    findings: Array<{
+        path: string;
+        message: string;
+    }>;
+};

package/dist/src/services/crystallization/evidence-brief-builder.js

@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+import { z } from "zod";
+import { EvidenceBriefSchema, } from "./crystallization-types.js";
+/**
+ * EvidenceBriefBuilder — spec §4.7 / §10 RL-7.
+ *
+ * The brief is a 4-section natural-language projection that MUST
+ * accompany every user-facing recommendation. The shape guard is
+ * encoded in `EvidenceBriefSchema` (see crystallization-types.ts);
+ * this module is the LLM-side entry point that PRODUCES the brief
+ * from a finished trace + evaluator summary and the validator that
+ * REFUSES to render a recommendation payload without all 4 sections.
+ *
+ * Hard rules (mirrored from spec):
+ *
+ *   1. Every section must be a non-empty NL string (1-2 sentences
+ *      for what_happened / why_it_matters / what_learned; 1
+ *      sentence for what_action). An empty section is a hard
+ *      `MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION` error.
+ *
+ *   2. The build path is lenient on raw prose and strict on the
+ *      final shape — `buildEvidenceBrief` calls
+ *      `EvidenceBriefSchema.parse(...)` so a partial brief throws
+ *      before reaching the database.
+ *
+ *   3. `renderRecommendationPayload` refuses to return a
+ *      recommendation envelope unless the brief passes the 4-section
+ *      guard. This is the CLI's single source of truth for "may I
+ *      show this to the user?".
+ *
+ *   4. The `evaluator_summary` is a separate field on the
+ *      crystallization_event row (spec §4.5) and is NOT part of the
+ *      brief. It feeds the broader recommendation envelope.
+ *
+ * Out of scope (deferred to later slices):
+ *   - LLM-authored brief generation from live trace evidence (M8 dogfood).
+ *   - brief rewrite-on-update semantics.
+ */
+/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+/* Input shapes — the builder is the only place these normalize.          */
+/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+/**
+ * The minimum viable trace shape that the builder needs to render
+ * a brief. The trace is the EVIDENCE; the builder is format-stable
+ * so a future slice can swap in a richer trace source without
+ * editing every caller.
+ */
+export const BriefTraceInputSchema = z.object({
+    trace_id: z.string().trim().min(1).max(256),
+    /**
+     * The full NL recap of the run. Required for what_happened.
+     * 1-2 sentences is the spec guidance; the builder does not
+     * truncate, but tests passing multi-paragraph input will be
+     * warned at the Zod boundary (max 4000 chars per section).
+     */
+    what_happened: z.string().trim().min(1).max(4000),
+    /**
+     * The "why this matters" recap. Required for why_it_matters.
+     */
+    why_it_matters: z.string().trim().min(1).max(4000),
+    /**
+     * Failure-mode and preference-extraction recap. Required for
+     * what_learned.
+     */
+    what_learned: z.string().trim().min(1).max(4000),
+    /**
+     * The recommended action. Required for what_action (1
+     * sentence per spec).
+     */
+    what_action: z.string().trim().min(1).max(4000),
+    /**
+     * Optional structured bullets (e.g. "4 phases, 3 gates passed,
+     * 1 evaluator verdict"). Counts are allowed at this layer; the
+     * brief section is the NL primary (RL-7).
+     */
+    bullets: z.array(z.string().trim().min(1).max(1000)).default([]),
+    /**
+     * Source trace ids backing the brief (the column on
+     * crystallization_event spec §4.5).
+     */
+    source_trace_pointers: z
+        .array(z.string().trim().min(1).max(256))
+        .default([]),
+});
+/**
+ * The summary emitted by the independent evaluators (spec §4.5
+ * `evaluator_summary` field). Optional for the brief builder — the
+ * brief can be built without it, but a filled evaluator_summary
+ * flows into the recommendation envelope.
+ */
+export const EvaluatorSummarySchema = z.object({
+    one_liner: z.string().trim().max(1000).default(""),
+    risk_tags: z.array(z.string().trim().min(1).max(200)).default([]),
+});
+/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+/* Recommendation envelope — the CLI renders this.                       */
+/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+export const RecommendationPayloadSchema = z.object({
+    brief: EvidenceBriefSchema,
+    bullets: z.array(z.string().trim().min(1).max(1000)).default([]),
+    source_trace_pointers: z
+        .array(z.string().trim().min(1).max(256))
+        .default([]),
+    evaluator_summary: EvaluatorSummarySchema.default({
+        one_liner: "",
+        risk_tags: [],
+    }),
+});
+/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+/* Errors                                                                 */
+/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+export class BriefSectionError extends Error {
+    code = "MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION";
+    findings;
+    constructor(message, findings = []) {
+        super(message);
+        this.name = "BriefSectionError";
+        this.findings = findings;
+    }
+}
+/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+/* Builder                                                                */
+/* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+/**
+ * Build a 4-section EvidenceBrief from a finished trace recap.
+ *
+ * The function is STRICT: it parses the input trace through
+ * `BriefTraceInputSchema`, then parses the assembled brief through
+ * `EvidenceBriefSchema`. Any missing section throws
+ * `BriefSectionError(MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION)` — the same code that
+ * `safeParseEvidenceBrief` returns — so a single error code is the
+ * user-facing signal for "brief incomplete, do not render".
+ *
+ * Brief-section related ZodErrors (e.g. `min(1)` on a section) are
+ * translated to `BriefSectionError` so callers only handle one
+ * shape of failure. Non-section ZodErrors (e.g. invalid `trace_id`)
+ * are re-raised unchanged.
+ *
+ * NOTE: callers who already have raw NL strings can also call
+ * `parseEvidenceBrief` directly; this function is the opinionated
+ * shape for trace -> brief.
+ */
+export function buildEvidenceBrief(trace, evaluatorSummary) {
+    let parsedTrace;
+    try {
+        parsedTrace = BriefTraceInputSchema.parse(trace);
+    }
+    catch (err) {
+        throw translateBriefZodError(err);
+    }
+    // Assemble the 4 sections verbatim from the trace recap. The Zod
+    // parser below re-asserts the 4-section guard.
+    const candidate = {
+        what_happened: parsedTrace.what_happened,
+        why_it_matters: parsedTrace.why_it_matters,
+        what_learned: parsedTrace.what_learned,
+        what_action: parsedTrace.what_action,
+    };
+    const result = EvidenceBriefSchema.safeParse(candidate);
+    if (!result.success) {
+        const findings = result.error.issues.map((i) => ({
+            path: i.path.join("."),
+            message: i.message,
+        }));
+        throw new BriefSectionError("evidence_brief must contain all 4 sections (what_happened, why_it_matters, what_learned, what_action) with non-empty content (spec §4.7 / RL-7)", findings);
+    }
+    // Silence the unused-var lint on evaluatorSummary at this layer —
+    // the builder currently does not consume it (the brief is NL
+    // primary), but the surface is preserved for callers via
+    // `renderRecommendationPayload` below.
+    void evaluatorSummary;
+    return result.data;
+}
+/**
+ * Translate a ZodError raised on a brief-section path into a
+ * `BriefSectionError`. Non-brief errors are re-raised.
+ */
+function translateBriefZodError(err) {
+    if (err instanceof z.ZodError) {
+        const issues = err.issues;
+        const allBrief = issues.every((i) => BRIEF_SECTION_KEYS.has(i.path.join(".")));
+        if (allBrief) {
+            const findings = issues.map((i) => ({
+                path: i.path.join("."),
+                message: i.message,
+            }));
+            throw new BriefSectionError("evidence_brief must contain all 4 sections (what_happened, why_it_matters, what_learned, what_action) with non-empty content (spec §4.7 / RL-7)", findings);
+        }
+    }
+    throw err;
+}
+const BRIEF_SECTION_KEYS = new Set([
+    "what_happened",
+    "why_it_matters",
+    "what_learned",
+    "what_action",
+]);
+/**
+ * Render the user-facing recommendation envelope (brief + bullets +
+ * trace pointers + evaluator summary). The function refuses to
+ * return a payload unless ALL 4 brief sections are present — this
+ * is the single CLI-facing gate per spec §10 RL-7.
+ *
+ * On success, returns the validated `RecommendationPayload`. On a
+ * missing-section brief, throws `BriefSectionError`.
+ */
+export function renderRecommendationPayload(trace, evaluatorSummary = { one_liner: "", risk_tags: [] }) {
+    const brief = buildEvidenceBrief(trace, evaluatorSummary);
+    const payload = RecommendationPayloadSchema.parse({
+        brief,
+        bullets: trace.bullets ?? [],
+        source_trace_pointers: trace.source_trace_pointers ?? [],
+        evaluator_summary: evaluatorSummary,
+    });
+    return payload;
+}
+/**
+ * Convenience: validate an arbitrary unknown payload AS IF it were a
+ * recommendation envelope. Returns a Result-like shape so the CLI can
+ * render a structured MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION error without try/catch
+ * noise.
+ */
+export function safeRenderRecommendationPayload(input) {
+    const r = RecommendationPayloadSchema.safeParse(input);
+    if (r.success)
+        return { ok: true, payload: r.data };
+    const findings = r.error.issues.map((i) => ({
+        path: i.path.join("."),
+        message: i.message,
+    }));
+    // Map brief failures to MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION. A failure is
+    // recognized as brief iff (a) every issue points at the brief or
+    // its sections, OR (b) the explicit refine message is present.
+    const isBrief = r.error.issues.every((i) => i.message.includes("evidence_brief must contain all 4 sections") ||
+        BRIEF_SECTION_KEYS.has(i.path.join(".")) ||
+        i.path[0] === "brief" ||
+        (i.path.length >= 2 && i.path[0] === "brief"));
+    return isBrief
+        ? { ok: false, code: "MISSING_BRIEF_SECTION", findings }
+        : { ok: false, findings };
+}

package/dist/src/services/dispatch/slice-dag.d.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /**
  * Slice complexity tier (v2.15.0 follow-up, G2 in 12 Gaps).
- * Used by Solo to schedule complex slices during user-attended hours
+ * Used by Code to schedule complex slices during user-attended hours
  * and trivial / simple slices overnight.
  */
 export type SliceComplexity = 'trivial' | 'simple' | 'complex';
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ export interface SliceNode {
      */
     readonly upstreamSync?: boolean;
     /**
-     * v2.15.0 follow-up — G2: complexity tier. Drives Solo's scheduling
+     * v2.15.0 follow-up — G2: complexity tier. Drives Code's scheduling
      * (complex = user-attended, simple/trivial = overnight). Optional.
      */
     readonly complexity?: SliceComplexity;

package/dist/src/services/dispatch/test-tool-detection.d.ts

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
  * The Test Tool Detection block is prepended to every sub-agent prompt
  * dispatched by peaks-loop (both the single-dispatch chokepoint in
  * `src/cli/commands/dispatch-commands.ts` and the DAG-dispatch chokepoint
- * in `src/services/solo/dag-orchestrator.ts`). It tells the sub-agent
+ * in `src/services/code/dag-orchestrator.ts`). It tells the sub-agent
  * to read `package.json#scripts.test` first and use the project-local
  * runner — never `npx <runner>` — so it cannot bypass the lockfile or
  * spawn a network-bound tool call.

package/dist/src/services/dispatch/test-tool-detection.js

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
  * The Test Tool Detection block is prepended to every sub-agent prompt
  * dispatched by peaks-loop (both the single-dispatch chokepoint in
  * `src/cli/commands/dispatch-commands.ts` and the DAG-dispatch chokepoint
- * in `src/services/solo/dag-orchestrator.ts`). It tells the sub-agent
+ * in `src/services/code/dag-orchestrator.ts`). It tells the sub-agent
  * to read `package.json#scripts.test` first and use the project-local
  * runner — never `npx <runner>` — so it cannot bypass the lockfile or
  * spawn a network-bound tool call.

package/dist/src/services/evolution/evolution-service.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+import type Database from "better-sqlite3";
+import { ZodError } from "zod";
+import { EVOLUTION_DEFAULT_DELTA_MIN, type EvolutionEvaluation, type EvolutionProposal, type EvolutionProposalInput, type EvolutionTargetKind, type EvolutionVerdict } from "./evolution-types.js";
+/**
+ * EvolutionService — Darwin-style ratchet enforcement.
+ *
+ * Hard rules enforced at THIS layer (not just the Zod schema) so
+ * the ratchet cannot be bypassed by a malformed input:
+ *
+ *   - AC-8:  exactly one target (target_count === 1) AND
+ *            exactly one optimization dimension per round.
+ *            Code:  EVOLUTION_MULTI_OBJECT, EVOLUTION_MULTI_DIMENSION.
+ *   - AC-10: the scorer (evaluator) MUST NOT be the author.
+ *            Code:  EVOLUTION_SELF_SCORE.
+ *   - AC-11: a `keep` verdict is BLOCKED when
+ *            score_delta < score_delta_min (default 1.0).
+ *            Code:  EVOLUTION_DELTA_BELOW_THRESHOLD.
+ *   - AC-12: evaluator_id MUST be a separate agent from
+ *            author_id and skeptic_id.
+ *   - AC-14: skeptic_id MUST be a separate agent from
+ *            author_id and evaluator_id.
+ *
+ * The service is intentionally narrow: createProposal / score /
+ * markVerdict / list / get. The actual scoring agents
+ * (IndependentEvaluatorRunner, RegressionSkepticRunner) live in
+ * separate files so the author reasoning is NEVER imported into
+ * the evaluator's process boundary.
+ */
+export type EvolutionIntegrityErrorCode = "EVOLUTION_MULTI_OBJECT" | "EVOLUTION_MULTI_DIMENSION" | "EVOLUTION_SELF_SCORE" | "EVOLUTION_DELTA_BELOW_THRESHOLD" | "EVOLUTION_MISSING_USER_CONFIRMATION" | "EVOLUTION_BELOW_RUBRIC";
+export declare class EvolutionIntegrityError extends Error {
+    readonly code: EvolutionIntegrityErrorCode;
+    readonly findings: ReadonlyArray<{
+        path: string;
+        message: string;
+    }>;
+    constructor(code: EvolutionIntegrityErrorCode, message: string, findings?: ReadonlyArray<{
+        path: string;
+        message: string;
+    }>);
+}
+export declare class EvolutionService {
+    private readonly db;
+    constructor(db: Database.Database);
+    /**
+     * Persist a new EvolutionProposal. Enforces AC-8 (single object /
+     * single dimension) BEFORE writing the row.
+     *
+     * The proposal id is auto-generated (`eval-<hex>`); callers supply
+     * the proposal content only. The proposal's `verdict` is set to
+     * `needs-user-decision` until the score + skeptic step lands.
+     *
+     * Throws:
+     *   - ZodError if the input fails schema validation.
+     *   - EvolutionIntegrityError(EVOLUTION_MULTI_OBJECT) if
+     *     single_object !== true.
+     *   - EvolutionIntegrityError(EVOLUTION_MULTI_DIMENSION) if
+     *     single_optimization_dimension !== true.
+     */
+    createProposal(input: EvolutionProposalInput): EvolutionProposal;
+    /**
+     * Score an existing proposal. Enforces AC-10 (no self-score:
+     * `evaluator_id !== proposal.author_id`) and AC-11 (delta
+     * threshold: cannot mark `keep` when `score_delta <
+     * score_delta_min`).
+     *
+     * Returns the FINAL evaluation row with verdict derived from the
+     * evaluator + skeptic results:
+     *   - `verdict = 'revert'` if the skeptic returned a blocker.
+     *   - `verdict = 'revert'` if the score delta is below threshold.
+     *   - `verdict = 'needs-user-decision'` otherwise; the CLI
+     *     (`peaks evolution evaluate`) surfaces this to the user for
+     *     a `keep` / `revert` choice.
+     *
+     * Throws:
+     *   - EvolutionIntegrityError(EVOLUTION_SELF_SCORE) if
+     *     evaluator_id === proposal.author_id.
+     *   - EvolutionIntegrityError(EVOLUTION_DELTA_BELOW_THRESHOLD) if
+     *     a `verdict = 'keep'` is requested and the delta is below
+     *     the proposal's `score_delta_min`.
+     */
+    score(proposalId: string, args: {
+        evaluator_id: string;
+        skeptic_id: string;
+        evaluator_result: import("./evolution-types.js").IndependentEvaluatorResult;
+        skeptic_result: import("./evolution-types.js").RegressionSkepticResult;
+        brief_pointer?: string;
+        user_confirmation_pointer?: string;
+    }): EvolutionEvaluation;
+    /**
+     * Mark a verdict explicitly (after the user has confirmed via
+     * natural-language or a pick). Enforces:
+     *   - AC-11: cannot mark `keep` when score_delta <
+     *     score_delta_min.
+     *   - AC-15: `keep` requires a user_confirmation_pointer.
+     *
+     * Throws:
+     *   - EvolutionIntegrityError(EVOLUTION_DELTA_BELOW_THRESHOLD)
+     *     when `verdict = 'keep'` and the delta is below threshold.
+     *   - EvolutionIntegrityError(EVOLUTION_MISSING_USER_CONFIRMATION)
+     *     when `verdict = 'keep'` and no user_confirmation_pointer
+     *     is supplied.
+     */
+    markVerdict(proposalId: string, verdict: EvolutionVerdict, userConfirmationPointer?: string): EvolutionEvaluation | undefined;
+    /** Revert a proposal (universal recovery). Always allowed. */
+    revert(proposalId: string, userConfirmationPointer?: string): EvolutionEvaluation | undefined;
+    /** Read an evolution evaluation by id. */
+    read(proposalId: string): EvolutionEvaluation | undefined;
+    /** List evaluations for a given target. */
+    listByTarget(opts: {
+        target_kind: EvolutionTargetKind;
+        target_release_id: string;
+        verdict?: EvolutionVerdict;
+    }): EvolutionEvaluation[];
+    /**
+     * Status snapshot for `peaks evolution status`. Returns counts of
+     * evaluations by verdict for the given target, plus the latest
+     * evaluation id (if any).
+     */
+    status(target: {
+        target_kind: EvolutionTargetKind;
+        target_release_id: string;
+    }): {
+        target_kind: EvolutionTargetKind;
+        target_release_id: string;
+        total: number;
+        byVerdict: Record<EvolutionVerdict, number>;
+        latest: EvolutionEvaluation | undefined;
+    };
+}
+/**
+ * Convenience: re-export the Zod error guard.
+ */
+export declare function isZodError(err: unknown): err is ZodError;
+/**
+ * Convenience: get the default `score_delta_min` from the spec.
+ */
+export { EVOLUTION_DEFAULT_DELTA_MIN };