peaks-loop 4.0.0-beta → 4.0.0-beta.10

package/skills/peaks-code/SKILL.md

@@ -3,9 +3,22 @@ name: peaks-code
 description: Code-domain loop engineering orchestrator for the Peaks-Loop skill family. Use when the user asks Peaks-Loop to handle a code-repo workflow end-to-end (端到端/全流程/需求开发), especially from a product document (PRD/飞书文档/Feishu doc) through implementation and validation. Coordinates peaks-prd, peaks-rd, peaks-qa, peaks-ui, peaks-sc, and peaks-txt while preserving user confirmation gates. Triggers on `/peaks-code`, "peaks code", "全流程开发", "端到端迭代". General primitives (peaks-resume / peaks-status / peaks-test) are sibling skills, not children.
 ---
 
+## Scope (RL-8 — red line, locked 2026-07-08)
+
+`peaks-code` is a **code-domain long-task loop engineering orchestrator; not a general-purpose orchestrator.**
+
+This is RL-8 from the Loop Engineering crystallization design
+(`docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-07-peaks-loop-loop-engineering-crystallization-design.md` §0.4 and §10 RL-8).
+The boundary is closed under this slice:
+
+- **In scope:** end-to-end code-domain workflows — repository scanning, RD planning, code implementation via RD, QA verification, UI changes inside a code repo, source-control handoff, and code-repo context packaging. Coordinated role skills: `peaks-prd`, `peaks-rd`, `peaks-qa`, `peaks-ui`, `peaks-sc`, `peaks-txt`.
+- **Out of scope:** research / content / product / medical / non-code domains. Each of those ships as an independent `peaks-*` skill that imports `.peaks/standards/loop-engineering-guidelines.md` and passes `peaks skill lint --category loop-engineering-readiness`. They are **not** subclasses or variants of `peaks-code`.
+- **Failure modes this rule prevents:** (a) `peaks-code` widening into a general orchestrator; (b) non-code capabilities being smuggled into `peaks-code`; (c) other domains being expressed as "peaks-code variants".
+- **Self-check:** before any new peak-* capability is added here, ask "is this code-domain?" If the answer is no, the right move is a new `peaks-*` skill, not an extension of `peaks-code`.
+
 ## Single-scope-axis naming convention (2.7.1)
 
-The `.peaks/` workspace has a **single scope axis** (session-id) plus a nested **sub-agent axis** under `.peaks/_sub_agents/<sessionId>/...`. Use `<sessionId>` (NEVER bare `<sid>`). Reviewable artifacts live at `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/<role>/...` (gitignored); the change-id is an optional filename slug and does NOT route filesystem writes. CLI: session-id → `peaks session *`; sub-agent → `peaks sub-agent *`. OpenSpec's `openspec/changes/<change-id>/` vocabulary (L4) is preserved. Test `skills-skill-md-naming.test.ts` enforces (a) zero bare `<sid>`, (b) axis labels, (c) this callout.
+The `.peaks/` workspace has a **single scope axis** (session-id) plus a nested **sub-agent axis** under `.peaks/_sub_agents/<sessionId>/...`. Use `<sessionId>` (NEVER bare `<sid>`). Reviewable artifacts live at `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/<role>/...` (gitignored); the change-id is an optional filename slug and does NOT route filesystem writes. CLI: session-id → `peaks session *`; sub-agent → `peaks sub-agent *`. Test `skills-skill-md-naming.test.ts` enforces (a) zero bare `<sid>`, (b) axis labels, (c) this callout.
 
 ## Karpathy guidance (Slice 1/6 — karpathy prompt-injection-lift)
 
@@ -15,9 +28,9 @@ Every sub-agent dispatch (`peaks-prd`, `peaks-rd`, `peaks-qa`, `peaks-ui`, `peak
 
 Never create `.peaks/_runtime/<YYYY-MM-DD-*>/` at the top level of `.peaks/`. ALL reviewable artifact dirs live under `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/<role>/...` (gitignored) — never as siblings of `.peaks/_runtime/`. `peaks workspace init` creates only `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/session.json`. If you find yourself about to write a date-prefixed directory directly under `.peaks/`, STOP and reroute under `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/`. The `.gitignore` rule + vitest guard at `tests/unit/workspace/top-level-change-id-guard.test.ts` enforce this.
 
-# Peaks-Loop Solo
+# Peaks-Loop Code
 
-Peaks-Loop Solo is the orchestration facade for the Peaks-Loop short skill family. Use it to identify the user scenario, recommend an execution mode, coordinate role skills, and produce the final handoff report. Do not collapse role responsibilities into this skill.
+Peaks-Loop Code is the orchestration facade for the Peaks-Loop short skill family. Use it to identify the user scenario, recommend an execution mode, coordinate role skills, and produce the final handoff report. Do not collapse role responsibilities into this skill.
 
 ## 产品定位(2026-06-28 校准)
 
@@ -29,7 +42,7 @@ This skill is the **primary surface**. The `peaks <cmd>` CLI is **auxiliary**
 
 ## Code-Change Red Line (BLOCKING — read before ANY tool call)
 
-**Peaks-Loop Solo is an orchestrator, NOT an implementer. You MUST NOT write, edit, or modify any application source code directly.** Every code change goes through `peaks-code → RD → QA → verdict`. **If you catch yourself about to write code, STOP.** Hand off to RD. Before declaring workflow complete, run `peaks workflow verify-pipeline --rid <rid> --project <repo> --json`.
+**Peaks-Loop Code is an orchestrator, NOT an implementer. You MUST NOT write, edit, or modify any application source code directly.** Every code change goes through `peaks-code → RD → QA → verdict`. **If you catch yourself about to write code, STOP.** Hand off to RD. Before declaring workflow complete, run `peaks workflow verify-pipeline --rid <rid> --project <repo> --json`.
 
 ## Peaks-Loop Startup sequence (MANDATORY — execute in order)
 
@@ -43,13 +56,7 @@ When a NEW conversation opens on a session whose `lastActivity` is from today AN
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step N: Periodic checkpoint (auto-fire, no user action)
 
-Proactive context-overflow defense. CLI: `peaks session checkpoint [--reason <r>] [...flags]`. Fire `--reason periodic` every 20 tool calls (G1 hard-coded), `--reason artifact-written` per PRD/RD/QA/TXT write. See `references/periodic-checkpoint.md` (otherwise `tests/unit/solo/checkpoint-periodic-frequency.test.ts` fails).
-
-### Peaks-Loop Step 0.5: OpenSpec first-run opt-in (conditional)
-
-Run when `openspec/` is absent and `.peaks/.peaks-openspec-opt-in.json` is missing. Asks once and persists the decision.
-
-→ see `references/openspec-workflow.md` for the full opt-in flow + lifecycle.
+Proactive context-overflow defense. CLI: `peaks session checkpoint [--reason <r>] [...flags]`. Fire `--reason periodic` every 20 tool calls (G1 hard-coded), `--reason artifact-written` per PRD/RD/QA/TXT write. See `references/periodic-checkpoint.md` (otherwise `tests/unit/code/checkpoint-periodic-frequency.test.ts` fails).
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step 0.6: Audit + Goal (NEW)
 
@@ -61,7 +68,7 @@ After autonomous work (RD, QA, security, perf), invoke peaks-final-review for 4-
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step N+2: Main-session context monitor (D6 + slice 2026-07-02)
 
-After every 4th tool call, probe via `peaks solo context-now --project <repo> --json`. Thresholds: 50% / **0.85 pre-compact / 0.95 red-line** (v2.13.0). **In Job mode ≥ 0.85 is MANDATORY auto-compact** (not advisory): Solo MUST call `peaks session auto-compact --execute --project <repo>` autonomously. Pass `--enforce-job-mode` to force the MANDATORY semantics in single-rid mode too (`job-shape.json` auto-enables it). **≥ 0.95** red line: next Bash/Task call fires `peaks session auto-compact-hook` (PreToolUse), in-band spawning `claude --compact`. **Karpathy §4 exception**: compact red line keeps runner alive → zero-intervention wins; LLM MUST NOT ask user to run `/compact`. Honor `--in-flight-batch` (D6.e).
+After every 4th tool call, probe via `peaks code context-now --project <repo> --json`. Thresholds: 50% / **0.85 pre-compact / 0.95 red-line** (v2.13.0). **In Job mode ≥ 0.85 is MANDATORY auto-compact** (`peaks session auto-compact --execute`). Pass `--enforce-job-mode` for single-rid. **≥ 0.95** red line: next Bash/Task fires `peaks session auto-compact-hook`. **Karpathy §4 exception**: compact red line keeps runner alive — zero-intervention wins; LLM MUST NOT ask user to run `/compact`. Honor `--in-flight-batch` (D6.e).
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step 0: Anchor the workflow (MANDATORY FIRST ACTIONS — no bail-out)
 
@@ -77,32 +84,25 @@ Run `peaks workspace init` + `peaks skill presence:set peaks-code` BEFORE any an
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step 0.7: Detect unfinished work and offer resume (BLOCKING on first invocation per session)
 
-After Step 0, run the resume-detection probe; surface via `AskUserQuestion` if a slice is in flight.
-
-**v3.1.2 resume rule:** if `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/job/<jid>/progress.json` exists, read it FIRST and surface `Next: slice #N of M (<currentSlice>)`. `peaks job progress --job-id <jid> [--allow-missing]` is the canonical reader; the same JSON is surfaced by `peaks solo gate-step-08` on every Bash call.
-
-**v2.11.0 D7 override:** if user just `/compact`ed, run `peaks solo post-compact-detect --project <repo> --json` FIRST; `shouldAutoResume: true` skips AskUserQuestion (D7.b). Log to `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/txt/auto-decisions.md`.
-
-→ see `references/resume-detection.md`.
+After Step 0, run the resume-detection probe; surface via `AskUserQuestion` if a slice is in flight. **v3.1.2 resume rule:** if `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/job/<jid>/progress.json` exists, read FIRST and surface `Next: slice #N of M`. **v2.11.0 D7 override:** if user just `/compact`ed, run `peaks code post-compact-detect --project <repo> --json` FIRST; `shouldAutoResume: true` skips AskUserQuestion. → `references/resume-detection.md`.
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step 0.55: 1.x → 2.0 detection (BLOCKING on first invocation per session, when the project is not on a 2.0 layout)
 
-After Step 0.7 returns "fresh", run `peaks upgrade --detect-1x --project <root> --json`. If `isOneX: true`, surface `AskUserQuestion`. Persist to `.peaks/preferences.json`. → `references/step-0-55-1x-detection.md`.
+After Step 0.7 returns "fresh", run `peaks upgrade --detect-1x --project <root> --json`. If `isOneX: true`, surface `AskUserQuestion`. → `references/step-0-55-1x-detection.md`.
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step 0.8 — Job 启动 (BLOCKING on LLM judgement — v3.1.1 patch + v3.1.2 mechanical gates)
 
-The CLI is a **recorder + gate** for job-shape (the LLM judges). LLM calls `peaks solo detect-job --is-job <bool> --rationale <text> --suggested-job-id <jid> --suggested-strategy <single|rotating> --confidence <high|medium|low>`, which writes `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/job-shape.json`. Downstream steps call `read-job-shape` and refuse if missing.
+> **CLI reality check (D-001 sediment, 2026-07-09):** The CLI surface has changed since this section was last verified. The actual command is **`peaks job init --job-id <jid> --slice-list <list> --main-loop-strategy <single|rotating> [--parallelism-hint <serial|llm-decides>] [--exit-policy <strict|best-effort>] [--project <repo>]`**. The legacy `peaks code detect-job --is-job/--suggested-job-id/--confidence` form described below is **no longer present** in 4.0.0-beta.6. If you find `--is-job` rejected, fall back to `peaks job init`.
 
-**Hard rule (v3.1.1 red-line #10):** LLM MUST NOT skip `peaks solo detect-job`. If `read-job-shape` throws `JOB_SHAPE_NOT_DECIDED`, record a decision before proceeding.
+The CLI is a **recorder + gate** for job-shape (the LLM judges). LLM calls `peaks job init --job-id <jid> --slice-list <list> --main-loop-strategy <single|rotating>` (with `--caller-id <id>` and `--project <repo>` in non-Claude-Code environments), which writes `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/job/<jid>/state.json` and emits a `[job-event] {kind: job-started, jobId, total, strategy}` line. Downstream steps call `peaks job status --job-id <jid>` to read state.
 
-**v3.1.2 mechanical gates** (recorder-only was bypassed twice):
+**Hard rule (v3.1.1 red-line #10):** LLM MUST NOT skip the job-init call. If `peaks job status` reports `done: 0` and the slice work has begun, the LLM forgot to initialize — re-call `peaks job init` immediately.
 
-- **PreToolUse hook** — `peaks workspace init` installs the `Bash` matcher `peaks solo gate-step-08 --project .`. Exits 0 when `job-shape.json` exists (also emits `Next: slice #N+1 of M` from `progress.json`); exits 2 BLOCKED when missing AND prompt matches a fail-closed backup regex; otherwise 0 (allow).
-- **Size-fear ban** — `peaks solo emit-handoff` refuses a final handoff while `remaining > 0` under Job mode.
-- **Forced auto-compact** — `peaks solo context-now --enforce-job-mode` (auto-enabled on `isJob=true`) returns `auto-compact-now` at ≥ 0.85; **In Job mode ≥ 0.85 is MANDATORY auto-compact** (not advisory).
-- **On-disk slice progress** — `peaks job checkpoint --state done` writes `progress.json`; `peaks job progress --job-id <jid> [--allow-missing]` is the canonical reader.
+> **D-003 sediment (2026-07-09):** The historical `JOB_SHAPE_NOT_DECIDED` exception thrown by `read-job-shape` is no longer wired in 4.0.0-beta.6. The current CLI uses `peaks job status` which reports a passive `done: 0` instead of throwing. Both behaviors enforce the same intent (no work may begin before init) but the failure mode is a soft warning rather than a hard exception. LLM should treat `done: 0` after Step 0.8 as a recoverable miss, not an unrecoverable error.
 
-Full mechanics (judgement criteria, hook table, backup-regex rationale, hook wiring) at `references/step-0-8-gate.md`.
+**v3.1.2 mechanical gates** (recorder-only was bypassed twice):
+
+PreToolUse hook on `peaks code gate-step-08`; size-fear ban on `peaks code emit-handoff`; forced auto-compact at ≥ 0.85 in Job mode; on-disk slice progress via `peaks job checkpoint` (canonical reader `peaks job progress --job-id <jid>`). Full mechanics (judgement criteria, hook table, backup-regex rationale, hook wiring) at `references/step-0-8-gate.md`.
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step 0.81 — per-slice 收尾
 
@@ -110,11 +110,11 @@ After commit: `peaks job checkpoint --slice-id <rid> --state done --commit-sha $
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step 0.85 — slice 阻塞处理
 
-Trigger: `repair-status` atCap=true, context-now red-line ≥5min, or `subagent-cleanup` fails twice. Action: `peaks job block --slice-id <rid> --reason "<reason>"` then STOP with TXT handoff.
+Trigger: `repair-status` atCap=true, context-now red-line ≥5min, or `subagent-cleanup` fails twice. Action: `peaks job block --slice-id <rid> --reason "<reason>"` then STOP.
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step 0.86 — main session rotation
 
-Active in rotating mode; fires every `rotateEvery` slices or on-demand via `peaks job rotate-now`. Sequence: cycle-summary → checkpoint rotate-marker → `peaks session rotate` → next turn resumes via `peaks session resume --job-id <jid>`.
+Active in rotating mode; fires every `rotateEvery` slices or via `peaks job rotate-now`. Sequence: cycle-summary → checkpoint rotate-marker → `peaks session rotate` → resume via `peaks session resume --job-id <jid>`.
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step 0.87 — sub-agent cleanup gate
 
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ Run `peaks project memories --project <repo> --json` to read decisions / convent
 
 ### Peaks-Loop Step 2.5: Set session title
 
-Extract a short title from the user's first request (8-20 Chinese chars or 4-10 English words). Run `peaks session title` with the active sid. Skip if a title is already set. → `references/skill-presence-and-title.md` (same file as Step 2).
+Extract a short title from the user's first request (8-20 Chinese chars or 4-10 English words). Run `peaks session title <sessionId> "<title>" --json`. Skip if a title is already set. → `references/skill-presence-and-title.md` (same file as Step 2). D-002: sid is positional, NOT `--session-id` flag (rejected with `error: unknown option`).
 
 ## Sub-agent session sharing (MANDATORY — one conversation = one sid)
 
@@ -144,7 +144,20 @@ When peaks-code dispatches a sub-agent (peaks-rd, peaks-qa, peaks-ui, peaks-txt,
 
 ## Boundaries
 
-Peaks-Loop Solo may: identify scenarios, recommend profiles, coordinate role skills through artifacts, coordinate project memory extraction, request user confirmation at risk/commit boundaries. Peaks-Loop Solo must NOT silently install hooks / create agents / enable MCP / modify Claude settings / create GitHub repos / bypass role-skill artifacts. → `references/boundaries.md`.
+Peaks-Loop Code may identify scenarios, recommend profiles, coordinate role skills via artifacts, coordinate project memory extraction, request user confirmation at risk/commit boundaries. MUST NOT silently install hooks / create agents / enable MCP / modify Claude settings / create GitHub repos / bypass role-skill artifacts. → `references/boundaries.md`.
+
+## CLI Drift Index (sediment 2026-07-09)
+
+> **Reading guide:** Verified against peaks-loop 4.0.0-beta.6. Each drift below is annotated inline at the relevant step with a `> CLI reality check`. On `error: unknown option ...`, **read the inline reality check first** before guessing.
+
+| Drift ID | Step | Symptom | Fix | Inline location |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+| **D-001** | 0.8 | `peaks code detect-job --is-job ...` rejected with `error: unknown option '--is-job'` | Use `peaks job init --job-id <jid> --slice-list <list> --main-loop-strategy <single\|rotating>` | §Step 0.8 first paragraph |
+| **D-002** | 2.5 | `peaks session title --session-id <sid> ...` rejected with `error: unknown option '--session-id'` (this is the bare `<sid>` anti-pattern) | sid is positional: `peaks session title <sessionId> "<title>" --json` | §Step 2.5 |
+| **D-003** | 0.8 | `JOB_SHAPE_NOT_DECIDED` exception expected but never thrown | Current behavior is `peaks job status` reports `done: 0` passively — treat as recoverable miss, not hard error | §Step 0.8 third paragraph |
+| **D-010** | 11c | `peaks memory extract` returns `extractedCount: 0` despite `<!-- peaks-memory:start -->` existing | Block requires YAML frontmatter (`title:` + `kind:` + `---`) + closing `<!-- peaks-memory:end -->`. Bare `peaks-memory:start` is parsed silently but produces no writes | §Step 11c + 11d |
+
+> **Sediment lesson (master record):** `.peaks/memory/peaks-code-runbook-4-0-0-beta-6-skill-md-cli-d-001-d-002-d-003-d-010.md`
 
 ## Peaks-Loop GStack integration
 
@@ -156,23 +169,23 @@ Step 0 creates the workspace; all intermediate artifacts land under `.peaks/_run
 
 ## Peaks-Loop Pre-RD project scan checklist (MANDATORY)
 
-Before handing off to `peaks-rd`, scan the project and record findings to `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/rd/project-scan.md`. → `references/project-scan-checklist.md`.
+Before handing off to `peaks-rd`, scan the project and record findings to `.peaks/project-scan/project-scan.md` (project-level, git-tracked; sibling of `.peaks/PROJECT.md`). Slice 2026-07-15-project-scan-bootstrap (G1 + G2): `peaks workspace init` and `peaks project context` both bootstrap this file automatically; only re-run the manual flow when the scan output is genuinely out of date. → `references/project-scan-checklist.md`.
+
+> **Slice 2026-07-15-project-scan-bootstrap G4b / AC9:** after `peaks workspace init`, the consumer project's `.peaks/project-scan/` directory carries 5 files: `project-scan.md` (generated by the scan logic) + `business-knowledge.md` + `security-template.md` + `perf-template.md` + `audit-output-schema.md` (the 4 audit/business templates bundled at `src/services/workspace/templates/project-scan/*.md`, copied on init; idempotent — existing files preserved unless `--force-project-scan-templates`). RD / UI / TXT / QA read from this tree; nothing else.
 
 ## Peaks-Loop Frontend-only development mode
 
-When the project has no live backend (no swagger.json, no API server), Solo must activate frontend-only mode. The CLI is authoritative — read `frontendOnly` and `frontendOnlyReason` from `peaks scan archetype --json`. → `references/frontend-only-mode.md`.
+When the project has no live backend (no swagger.json, no API server), Code must activate frontend-only mode. The CLI is authoritative — read `frontendOnly` and `frontendOnlyReason` from `peaks scan archetype --json`. → `references/frontend-only-mode.md`.
 
 ## Peaks-Loop Request type classification + Workflow order + Transition verification gates
 
-The contract for the 6-type classification table, the 11-step workflow order, and the 7 transition verification gates (A through G with their `ls` / `grep` shell snippets) lives in `references/workflow-gates-and-types.md`. The peaks-code narrative references those gate numbers (Gate A through Gate G) — keep both files in lockstep when adding or renaming a gate.
+The 6-type table + 11-step order + 7 transition gates (A-G) live in `references/workflow-gates-and-types.md`. peaks-code narrative references Gate A-G — keep both files in lockstep.
 
 ## Peaks-Loop Default sub-agent fan-out (≥ 2 leaves/topological level → `--from-dag`)
 
 > **Slice 5:** when the slice DAG has ≥ 2 leaves at one topological level, dispatch via `peaks sub-agent dispatch --from-dag <dag-file>` (wall-time ≈ max, not sum).
 
-Write DAG → `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/sc/slice-dag.json`, run `peaks sub-agent dispatch --from-dag <dag-file> --batch-id <id>` once; orchestrator emits N parallel `buildToolCall` (`dispatchCount === N`).
-
-> **2026-06-28 校准:** 主路径 = 唯一蜂群;config/docs/chore 跳过不打断。详见 `.peaks/memory/peaks-loop-24h-ai-programmer-positioning.md`。
+Write DAG → `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/sc/slice-dag.json`, run `peaks sub-agent dispatch --from-dag <dag-file> --batch-id <id>` once; orchestrator emits N parallel `buildToolCall` (`dispatchCount === N`). 主路径 = 唯一蜂群;config/docs/chore 跳过不打断。详见 `.peaks/memory/peaks-loop-24h-ai-programmer-positioning.md`。
 
 ### Hard constraint: fan-out is mandatory (slice 2026-06-24-audit-5th-p2)
 
@@ -186,7 +199,7 @@ Write DAG → `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/sc/slice-dag.json`, run `peaks sub-ag
 
 ## Peaks-Loop Mandatory RD QA repair loop (AUTO-PROCEED)
 
-After `peaks-rd` finishes, Solo MUST auto-route to `peaks-qa` without waiting for confirmation. Cap: 3 cycles; on 3rd failure emit blocked TXT handoff. Full 5-step procedure at `references/micro-cycle.md`.
+After `peaks-rd` finishes, Code MUST auto-route to `peaks-qa` without waiting for confirmation. Cap: 3 cycles; on 3rd failure emit blocked TXT handoff. Full 5-step procedure at `references/micro-cycle.md`.
 
 ## Default runbook
 
@@ -216,39 +229,23 @@ After final validation, refresh project-local standards via `peaks standards ini
 
 ## Peaks-Loop Step 11: Memory sediment (BLOCKING on workflow complete)
 
-> **Hard rule.** Solo MUST NOT declare a workflow complete until Step 11 has produced ≥ 1 file in `.peaks/memory/` (the durable, LLM-authored memory store) OR the user has explicitly approved a no-sediment outcome via AskUserQuestion. Applies to **all modes** including `assisted` and `strict` — `assisted` previously skipped Step 10 because there was no `[CONFIRM]` gate; Step 11 fixes that.
-
-### Substeps (BLOCKING)
-
-**11a — Gate A (txt/ inventory):** `find .peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/txt/ -type f -name '*.md' | head`. If **0 files** → STOP. Dispatch `peaks-txt` first to write `handoff.md`, then return to 11c.
-
-**11b — Gate B (memory block embed scan):** `grep -c 'peaks-memory:start' .peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/txt/handoff.md || true`. If **0 AND this session surfaced a stable project fact** (decision / convention / approved refactor / hard rule), STOP and tell peaks-txt to embed at least one `<!-- peaks-memory:start -->` block first.
-
-**11c — Canonical extract** (the only CLI that writes `.peaks/memory/`): `peaks memory extract --project <repo> --artifact .peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/txt/handoff.md --apply --json`. `--apply` is REQUIRED (without it the command only previews — no files land).
-
-**11d — Gate C (zero-write outcome):** If `extractedCount === 0` after 11c, fire AskUserQuestion:
-
-> "本次 solo 未沉淀任何 `.peaks/memory` 文件。可选: (a) 回去在 handoff.md 嵌入至少 1 个 `peaks-memory:start` block 后重试; (b) 显式接受 no-sediment 并记录为 lesson; (c) 取消完成。"
-
-Default option = (a). Solo MUST NOT silently accept (b) without user pick. Full bash + flow at `references/runbook.md` §Step 11.
-
-**Why this step exists:** audit 2026-07-03 confirmed 2 consecutive sessions produced zero `.peaks/memory/` files despite completing RD + QA + handoff artifacts; `assisted` mode silently skipped runbook Step 10 (no STOP condition). **Why `peaks memory extract` (not `peaks project memories:extract`):** the artifact-scoped extract is canonical; the batch-scoped sibling is for non-handoff flows. Always use `peaks memory extract --apply`.
+> **Hard rule.** Code MUST NOT declare a workflow complete until Step 11 has produced ≥ 1 file in `.peaks/memory/` OR the user has explicitly approved a no-sediment outcome via AskUserQuestion. Canonical CLI: `peaks memory extract --project <repo> --artifact .peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/txt/handoff.md --apply --json` (the artifact-scoped extract; the batch-scoped sibling `peaks project memories:extract` is for non-handoff flows only). Substeps 11a/11b/11c/11d (Gate A/B/C), D-010 fix root cause check → `references/step-11-memory-sediment.md` + `references/runbook.md` §Step 11.
 
 ## Peaks-Loop External references and lifecycle
 
-3rd-party integrations (codegraph, mattpocock/skills, shadcn/ui, MCPs, Context7) follow Discovery → Reference → Side effect through Peaks CLI only. Run `peaks capabilities` for capability discovery; treat external skills as reference material only. MCP servers (Playwright / Chrome DevTools / Figma) are user-installed — check the tool list for `mcp__<server>__*` entries. Do not execute upstream installer / run upstream commands / persist sensitive examples / install upstream resources directly — funnel side effects through the Peaks CLI surface. Peaks-Loop Solo gates remain authoritative. → `references/external-references.md` + `references/external-skill-invocation.md`.
+3rd-party integrations (codegraph, mattpocock/skills, shadcn/ui, MCPs, Context7) follow Discovery → Reference → Side effect through Peaks CLI only. Run `peaks capabilities` for capability discovery; treat external skills as reference material only. MCP servers (Playwright / Chrome DevTools / Figma) are user-installed — check the tool list for `mcp__<server>__*` entries. Do not execute upstream installer / run upstream commands / persist sensitive examples / install upstream resources directly — funnel side effects through the Peaks CLI surface. Peaks-Loop Code gates remain authoritative. → `references/external-references.md` + `references/external-skill-invocation.md`.
 
 ## Codegraph orchestration context
 
-`peaks codegraph affected` is an optional project-analysis enhancement (untrusted supporting evidence) for role handoff. Solo must not treat codegraph output as approval for scope, design, or QA verdict. Never mutate agent settings / hooks from codegraph; do not commit `.codegraph/` artifacts. RD writes `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/rd/codegraph-context.md`; QA / TXT consume the same envelope. → `references/codegraph-orchestration.md`.
+`peaks codegraph affected` is an optional project-analysis enhancement (untrusted supporting evidence) for role handoff. Code must not treat codegraph output as approval for scope, design, or QA verdict. Never mutate agent settings / hooks from codegraph; do not commit `.codegraph/` artifacts. RD writes `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/rd/codegraph-context.md`; QA / TXT consume the same envelope. → `references/codegraph-orchestration.md`.
 
 ## Sub-agent context governance (G7 + G7.7 + G8 + G9 — slice #010)
 
 Main LLM reducer sees metadata-only view (~200 chars/sub-agent); on-demand `Read` for full content. Threshold table: 50% soft warn, 75% `CONTEXT_NEAR_LIMIT`, 80% hard reject (CLI + hook double-guard). → `references/context-governance.md`.
 
-## Sub-agent cross-batch signal — G8.4 share / shared-read / await (slice 2026-06-23-audit-3rd)
+## Sub-agent cross-batch signal — G8.4 share / shared-read / await
 
-Three CLI primitives let sibling sub-agents coordinate: `peaks sub-agent share / shared-read / await` (last-write-wins, ≤ 1KB warn / ≥ 64KB reject). Channel file gitignored under `.peaks/_sub_agents/<sessionId>/shared/`.
+Three CLI primitives: `peaks sub-agent share / shared-read / await` (last-write-wins, ≤ 1KB warn / ≥ 64KB reject). Channel gitignored under `.peaks/_sub_agents/<sessionId>/shared/`.
 
 ## References
 
@@ -260,7 +257,7 @@ Index of every `references/` file. Read on demand.
 | `references/a2a-artifact-mapping.md` | A2A artifact-path mapping. |
 | `references/anchoring-and-session-info.md` | Step 0 + session-conflict. |
 | `references/artifact-contracts.md` | Sub-agent handoff contracts. |
-| `references/boundaries.md` | Solo's do / don't list. |
+| `references/boundaries.md` | Code's do / don't list. |
 | `references/browser-workflow.md` | Browser workflow (Playwright MCP). |
 | `references/codegraph-orchestration.md` | Codegraph role handoff. |
 | `references/command-migration.md` | Legacy command migration. |
@@ -275,7 +272,6 @@ Index of every `references/` file. Read on demand.
 | `references/local-artifact-workspace.md` | Workspace tree + root-prohibition. |
 | `references/micro-cycle.md` | RD micro-cycle + repair loop. |
 | `references/mode-selection.md` | Step 1 mode + `--mode`. |
-| `references/openspec-workflow.md` | Step 0.5 OpenSpec. |
 | `references/playwright-mcp-multi-terminal.md` | Multi-terminal Playwright MCP. |
 | `references/project-memory-loading.md` | Step 2.3 memories. |
 | `references/project-scan-checklist.md` | Pre-RD scan + template. |

package/skills/peaks-code/references/anchoring-and-session-info.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 # Step 0 — Anchor the workflow
 
-> Body of `### Peaks-Loop Step 0: Anchor the workflow`. The instant Peaks-Loop Solo is invoked, **before** the mode-selection question, before any analysis, and before you decide whether the request "needs" the full pipeline, you MUST run these two commands and see their output:
+> Body of `### Peaks-Loop Step 0: Anchor the workflow`. The instant Peaks-Loop Code is invoked, **before** the mode-selection question, before any analysis, and before you decide whether the request "needs" the full pipeline, you MUST run these two commands and see their output:
 
 ```bash
 # Session ID is auto-generated when omitted; the command returns it in the JSON output.
 # Do NOT pass --session-id manually — the CLI is the single source of truth for the
 # project session binding. To look up the active session id from a skill / sub-agent,
 # use `peaks session info --active --json` (read-only, no side effects). To avoid
-# the "two sessions in .peaks/" confusion that bites Solo, always omit --session-id
+# the "two sessions in .peaks/" confusion that bites Code, always omit --session-id
 # here and let the CLI auto-generate.
 peaks workspace init --project <repo> --json
 peaks skill presence:set peaks-code --project <repo> --gate startup

package/skills/peaks-code/references/artifact-contracts.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Default local artifact root: `.peaks/_runtime/<session-id>/` with role subdirectories `prd/`, `rd/`, `ui/`, `qa/`, `sc/`, and `txt/`.
 
-Solo coordinates artifact paths and handoff completeness. Keep artifacts local by default. Do not commit, sync, or move them to a git-backed artifact repository unless explicitly authorized.
+Code coordinates artifact paths and handoff completeness. Keep artifacts local by default. Do not commit, sync, or move them to a git-backed artifact repository unless explicitly authorized.
 
 ## Artifact file naming conventions
 

package/skills/peaks-code/references/boundaries.md

@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 # Boundaries
 
-> Body of `## Boundaries`. Peaks-Loop Solo may:
+> Body of `## Boundaries`. Peaks-Loop Code may:
 
 - identify scenarios such as refactor, bugfix, QA hardening, release validation, and incident response;
-- recommend Solo, Assisted, Swarm, or Strict profiles;
+- recommend Code, Assisted, Swarm, or Strict profiles;
 - coordinate Peaks-Loop role skills through artifacts;
 - coordinate project memory extraction from stable skill artifact sections;
 - request user confirmation at risk and commit boundaries;
 - read CLI doctor/profile/artifact reports.
 
-Peaks-Loop Solo must not silently:
+Peaks-Loop Code must not silently:
 
 - install hooks;
 - create agents;

package/skills/peaks-code/references/codegraph-orchestration.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 # Codegraph orchestration context
 
-> Body of `## Codegraph orchestration context`. Solo treats `peaks codegraph affected --project <path> <changed-files...> --json` as an optional project-analysis enhancement that informs the role handoff between PRD, RD, and QA. The output is untrusted supporting evidence — Solo must not treat codegraph output as approval for scope, design, or QA verdict.
+> Body of `## Codegraph orchestration context`. Code treats `peaks codegraph affected --project <path> <changed-files...> --json` as an optional project-analysis enhancement that informs the role handoff between PRD, RD, and QA. The output is untrusted supporting evidence — Code must not treat codegraph output as approval for scope, design, or QA verdict.
 
 Do not run upstream installer flows, mutate agent settings, or commit `.codegraph/` artifacts into git. Peaks-Loop gates remain authoritative; codegraph context is a hint, never a substitute for role-skill output.

package/skills/peaks-code/references/dag-orchestrator.md

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 # DAG-aware sub-agent dispatch (2.7.0)
 
-Solo delegates layer-by-layer fan-out + join-barrier + cancel-on-fail
-to **`runDag(dag, opts)`** in `src/services/solo/dag-orchestrator.ts`
-when a slice's dependency surface is a DAG. Solo MUST NOT re-implement
+Code delegates layer-by-layer fan-out + join-barrier + cancel-on-fail
+to **`runDag(dag, opts)`** in `src/services/code/dag-orchestrator.ts`
+when a slice's dependency surface is a DAG. Code MUST NOT re-implement
 these mechanics inline.
 
 ## When to use `runDag`
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Use single-role `peaks sub-agent dispatch <role>` for everything else.
 ## Contract
 
 ```ts
-import { runDag } from '../services/solo/dag-orchestrator.js';
+import { runDag } from '../services/code/dag-orchestrator.js';
 const result = await runDag(dag, {
   projectRoot, sessionId, requestId, role, ide,
   dispatch: async (spec) => { /* LLM-side runner executes SubAgentDispatcher.buildToolCall(spec) */ },
@@ -34,14 +34,14 @@ const result = await runDag(dag, {
 ## Failure handling
 
 Any leaf failure → orchestrator sends `cancel` to in-flight siblings;
-Solo gets partial `DagRunResult`, treats slice as `return-to-rd`,
+Code gets partial `DagRunResult`, treats slice as `return-to-rd`,
 re-enters at the failed layer on next repair cycle. Per-IDE timeout:
 trae / trae-cn / cursor 30s, codex 45s, claude-code 60s; uniform
 120_000ms clamp ceiling.
 
 ## Source-of-truth pointers
 
-- Orchestrator: `src/services/solo/dag-orchestrator.ts` (`runDag` +
+- Orchestrator: `src/services/code/dag-orchestrator.ts` (`runDag` +
   `buildDispatchSpec` + `formatContractInjection`)
 - DAG model: `src/services/dispatch/slice-dag.ts`
   (`validateDag` / `topologicalLevels` / `sliceReadyToRun` / `hashDag`)
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ trae / trae-cn / cursor 30s, codex 45s, claude-code 60s; uniform
 - Contract store: `src/services/dispatch/contract-store.ts`
 - CLI surface: `peaks sub-agent dispatch --from-dag <file> --batch-id <id>`
   and `peaks sub-agent await --batch <id> [--timeout <ms>]`
-- Tests: `tests/unit/solo/dag-orchestrator.test.ts` (cancel-on-fail),
+- Tests: `tests/unit/code/dag-orchestrator.test.ts` (cancel-on-fail),
   `tests/unit/dispatch/run-dag-dogfood-mvp.test.ts` (MVP dogfood),
   `tests/unit/dispatch/slice-dag-dispatcher-5ide-dogfood.test.ts`
   (5 IDE end-to-end).

package/skills/peaks-code/references/external-references.md

@@ -4,14 +4,12 @@
 
 **Codegraph**: Optional project-analysis before RD handoff. Use `peaks codegraph affected --project <path> <changed-files...> --json` for regression-surface hints. Output as untrusted supporting evidence only; never commit `.codegraph/` artifacts.
 
-Solo treats `peaks codegraph affected --project <path> <changed-files...> --json` as an optional project-analysis enhancement that informs the role handoff between PRD, RD, and QA. The output is untrusted supporting evidence — Solo must not treat codegraph output as approval for scope, design, or QA verdict.
+Code treats `peaks codegraph affected --project <path> <changed-files...> --json` as an optional project-analysis enhancement that informs the role handoff between PRD, RD, and QA. The output is untrusted supporting evidence — Code must not treat codegraph output as approval for scope, design, or QA verdict.
 
 Do not run upstream installer flows, mutate agent settings, or commit `.codegraph/` artifacts into git. Peaks-Loop gates remain authoritative; codegraph context is a hint, never a substitute for role-skill output.
 
 **External skills**: All external skill references (`mattpocock/skills`, `awesome-design-md`, `taste-skill`, `shadcn/ui`, `Chrome DevTools MCP`, `Figma Context MCP`, `Context7`, etc.) follow the three-stage pattern: capability discovery via `peaks capabilities` before naming, references only (no execute/install/persist), Peaks-Loop CLI for all side effects. Do not execute upstream installers, do not install upstream resources, do not persist sensitive examples — Peaks-Loop gates remain authoritative. External skills inform, they do not approve.
 
-**OpenSpec lifecycle**: `render → validate → show → to-rd → validate → archive`. Solo's default runbook handles the exit gate (validate → archive after QA pass). Entry-gate validation (to-rd before slicing) is available when `openspec/` exists pre-workflow; Solo delegates it to `peaks-rd` during implementation.
-
 **MCP lifecycle**: `list → plan → apply --yes → call → rollback`. `apply` backs up settings and refuses non-peaks entries unless `--claim` is passed.
 
-Detailed rules: `references/external-skill-invocation.md`, `references/openspec-mcp-workflow.md`, `references/workflow.md`, `references/existing-system-extraction.md`. For an informational mapping of peaks artefact paths to the A2A (Agent2Agent) protocol's Task / Artifact / Part / Message / AgentCard vocabulary (no A2A implementation, just a shared naming layer), see `references/a2a-artifact-mapping.md`.
+Detailed rules: `references/external-skill-invocation.md`, `references/workflow.md`, `references/existing-system-extraction.md`. For an informational mapping of peaks artefact paths to the A2A (Agent2Agent) protocol's Task / Artifact / Part / Message / AgentCard vocabulary (no A2A implementation, just a shared naming layer), see `references/a2a-artifact-mapping.md`.

package/skills/peaks-code/references/external-skill-invocation.md

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ The skill body must not silently:
 - commit or sync intermediate artifacts;
 - create remote repositories.
 
-All of these must route through the Peaks CLI under the appropriate command (`peaks artifacts …`, `peaks memory …`, `peaks openspec …`, `peaks standards …`, `peaks codegraph …`, `peaks capabilities …`), with dry-run preview where supported and `--yes` / `--apply` where a real write is required. The `peaks mcp …` command tree was retired in slice #016; MCP install / dispatch is the LLM runtime's job, not the CLI's.
+All of these must route through the Peaks CLI under the appropriate command (`peaks artifacts …`, `peaks memory …`, `peaks standards …`, `peaks codegraph …`, `peaks capabilities …`), with dry-run preview where supported and `--yes` / `--apply` where a real write is required. The `peaks mcp …` command tree was retired in slice #016; MCP install / dispatch is the LLM runtime's job, not the CLI's. Note: peaks-code's 11-step workflow does NOT route through any external artifact lifecycle (OpenSpec or otherwise) — all reads/writes are confined to the LLM-authored artifact workspace under `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/<role>/`. External CLI surfaces remain available for users who call them directly, but Code never calls them on the user's behalf as of the 2026-07-08 RR decoupling slice.
 
 ## Allowed in-process references
 

package/skills/peaks-code/references/fanout-mandatory.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Fan-out is mandatory (slice 2026-06-24-audit-5th-p2)
 
-> **Reference contract.** Slice 5 (`feat(solo): default to multi-sub-agent
+> **Reference contract.** Slice 5 (`feat(code): default to multi-sub-agent
 > fan-out when DAG has >= 2 same-level leaves`) shipped in 2.8.0 with
 > `'fan-out'` as the default but kept `'serial'` as an opt-out. Slice
 > 2026-06-24-audit-5th-p2 (this slice, 2.8.4) **removes the opt-out** by
@@ -95,10 +95,10 @@ shape it had pre-slice — the difference is that anything outside
 
 ## Tests
 
-- `tests/unit/solo/skills-solo-fanout-mandatory.test.ts` — pins that
+- `tests/unit/code/skills-code-fanout-mandatory.test.ts` — pins that
   SKILL.md still mentions `--from-dag`, does NOT mention `serial`
   opt-out, and references `references/fanout-mandatory.md`.
-- `tests/integration/solo/multi-sub-agent-fanout.test.ts` — pins the
+- `tests/integration/code/multi-sub-agent-fanout.test.ts` — pins the
   runtime fan-out behavior; not affected by this slice.
 
 ## Rollout

package/skills/peaks-code/references/fast-mode.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-# Solo fast mode (slice 2 — round-trip ≤ 30s)
+# Code fast mode (slice 2 — round-trip ≤ 30s)
 
 For hot-fix / small-bug slices where the full 5-step workflow is overkill,
-use **fast mode**: `peaks solo plan --fast <change-id>`. Fast mode skips
+use **fast mode**: `peaks code plan --fast <change-id>`. Fast mode skips
 three steps that dominate cold-start cost:
 
 | Step | Default | Fast |

package/skills/peaks-code/references/frontend-only-mode.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 > Extracted from `skills/peaks-code/SKILL.md` on 2026-06-09 (slice 019 — slim skill files to references) to keep SKILL.md under the 800-line cap from `common/coding-style.md`. The content below is the verbatim Frontend-only development mode section that was previously inline; nothing was paraphrased, just relocated.
 
-When the project has no live backend (no swagger.json, no API server), Solo must activate frontend-only mode.
+When the project has no live backend (no swagger.json, no API server), Code must activate frontend-only mode.
 
 ### Mode determination (deterministic — CLI is the source of truth)
 
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@ The CLI decision is authoritative. Read `frontendOnly` and `frontendOnlyReason`
 User-stated intent is **only** consulted when it conflicts with the CLI result. The two conflict cases:
 
 - **CLI says `frontendOnly=false` but the user says "前端项目 / 没有后端 / 先 mock 数据"**: STOP and `AskUserQuestion` to confirm whether to override the scan (the repo probably contains a backend folder the user wants to ignore). Record the override decision and reason in `project-scan.md`.
-- **CLI says `frontendOnly=true` but the user says "需要做后端 / 加 API"**: STOP and `AskUserQuestion` to confirm whether the request actually targets the missing backend (the user may be confused about repo scope, or there is a separate backend repo Solo should switch to).
+- **CLI says `frontendOnly=true` but the user says "需要做后端 / 加 API"**: STOP and `AskUserQuestion` to confirm whether the request actually targets the missing backend (the user may be confused about repo scope, or there is a separate backend repo Code should switch to).
 
 When there is no conflict, do not ask — the CLI value wins and the workflow proceeds.
 
 ### Mock data strategy selection
 
-Solo records the chosen mock strategy in `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/rd/tech-doc.md` under a `## Mock Data Strategy` section. The choice depends on the project scan results:
+Code records the chosen mock strategy in `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/rd/tech-doc.md` under a `## Mock Data Strategy` section. The choice depends on the project scan results:
 
 | Project data-fetching pattern | Recommended mock approach | Rationale |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -59,15 +59,15 @@ When swagger.json becomes available later, the migration follows this sequence:
 3. Remove corresponding mock files.
 4. Run QA regression to verify the real API responses match the mock interface contracts.
 
-Solo records the migration readiness in the TXT handoff capsule under a `## API Migration` section listing: mock file paths, the corresponding swagger endpoints (when known), and the migration status for each.
+Code records the migration readiness in the TXT handoff capsule under a `## API Migration` section listing: mock file paths, the corresponding swagger endpoints (when known), and the migration status for each.
 
 ### Feishu document access fallback
 
 When the PRD source is a Feishu/Lark document that requires authentication:
 
-1. **Primary path**: Playwright MCP headed browser → user completes login → Solo reads document content via `browser_snapshot`.
-2. **Fallback A (user cannot login)**: Ask user to copy-paste the document content or export as Markdown/PDF. Solo creates the PRD artifact from the pasted content.
-3. **Fallback B (user provides export)**: User drops a `.md` or `.pdf` export into `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/prd/source/`. Solo reads and processes it.
+1. **Primary path**: Playwright MCP headed browser → user completes login → Code reads document content via `browser_snapshot`.
+2. **Fallback A (user cannot login)**: Ask user to copy-paste the document content or export as Markdown/PDF. Code creates the PRD artifact from the pasted content.
+3. **Fallback B (user provides export)**: User drops a `.md` or `.pdf` export into `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/prd/source/`. Code reads and processes it.
 4. **Fallback C (none of the above)**: Mark PRD as `blocked` with reason `doc-inaccessible`, list the exact next steps for the user, and pause the workflow.
 
 Never silently fall back to unauthenticated `fetch` or `WebFetch` for authenticated documents.
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Never silently fall back to unauthenticated `fetch` or `WebFetch` for authentica
 
 ### Frontend-only trigger pre-flight
 
-> Body of `### Frontend-only trigger pre-flight`. Before computing the swarm plan, Solo runs the keyword scan deterministically:
+> Body of `### Frontend-only trigger pre-flight`. Before computing the swarm plan, Code runs the keyword scan deterministically:
 
 1. Read `.peaks/_runtime/<sessionId>/prd/requests/<rid>.md` body.
 2. Lowercase + strip markdown; check regex `\b(页面|组件|表单|弹窗|表格|样式|布局|交互|UI|UX|page|component|form|modal|table|styling|layout|interaction|frontend|前端)\b`.
@@ -84,4 +84,4 @@ Never silently fall back to unauthenticated `fetch` or `WebFetch` for authentica
 4. If `frontendOnly` (from project-scan) is `true` and no keyword hit → UI joins anyway (frontend-only project, even non-visual changes may need visual sanity for regressions).
 5. If `frontendOnly` is `false` and no keyword hit → UI skipped.
 
-Solo records the pre-flight result in `sc/swarm-plan.json` so the audit trail shows why UI was or was not included.
+Code records the pre-flight result in `sc/swarm-plan.json` so the audit trail shows why UI was or was not included.

package/skills/peaks-code/references/job-loop.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Peaks-Loop Solo — Job Loop Deep-Dive
+# Peaks-Loop Code — Job Loop Deep-Dive
 
 > Read alongside `SKILL.md` Steps 0.8 / 0.81 / 0.85 / 0.86 / 0.87.
 

package/skills/peaks-code/references/local-artifact-workspace.md

@@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ system/          # Existing-system extraction output (visual tokens, conventions
 
 Files written into these directories during the workflow (not pre-created — they appear as their step runs):
 
-- `rd/project-scan.md` (Solo step 0.6)
+- `rd/project-scan.md` (Code step 0.6)
 - `rd/tech-doc.md` (feature/refactor planning; required by `rd → implemented` gate)
 - `rd/bug-analysis.md` (bugfix planning; required by `rd → implemented` gate for `--type bugfix`)
 - `rd/code-review.md`, `rd/security-review.md` (required by `rd → qa-handoff` gate for feature/bugfix/refactor; security-review only for config)
 - `rd/mock-plan.md` (frontend-only mode)
 - `ui/design-draft.md` (UI step)
-- `system/existing-system.md` (Solo step 0.7; legacy projects only)
+- `system/existing-system.md` (Code step 0.7; legacy projects only)
 - `qa/test-cases/<rid>.md`, `qa/test-reports/<rid>.md`, `qa/security-findings.md`, `qa/performance-findings.md` (gated per `--type`)
 
 ## Root pollution prohibition (CRITICAL)