paqad-ai 1.75.2 → 1.75.4

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,28 @@
1
1
  # paqad-ai
2
2
 
3
+ ## 1.75.4
4
+
5
+ ### Patch Changes
6
+
7
+ - 92b4710: fix(#205): never count generated `.paqad/` artifacts as changed code in verification
8
+
9
+ When the runtime self-hosts, its generated artifacts land under a nested
10
+ `.paqad/` home (`runtime/base/.paqad/`) that the root-only managed gitignore does
11
+ not cover, so they leak into the working tree. The change-evidence classifier
12
+ treated anything under `runtime/` as code, so the change-completeness gate demanded
13
+ test evidence and doc updates for generated logs and evidence JSON. `isCodeFile`
14
+ now excludes every `.paqad/` home (root or nested) via the new
15
+ `isPaqadArtifactPath` predicate, and the verification changed-file scan strips
16
+ `.paqad/` artifacts entirely, so they never reach `code_changed`, the test-evidence
17
+ preview, the quality ratchet, or scope drift. (The invisible Stop-hook loop and the
18
+ silent exit-2 from the original report were already resolved by #303/#368.)
19
+
20
+ ## 1.75.3
21
+
22
+ ### Patch Changes
23
+
24
+ - dc6976f: Reframe the security workflow copy to remove two overclaims (#206). User-facing text no longer calls the security pass a "full OWASP pentest" with "full OWASP coverage" or claims it proves code is "safe"; it is now described as an OWASP WSTG-structured security self-review that hardens code before a certified pentest, it does not replace one. Copy-only: workflow ids, routing patterns, the `pentest` invocation alias, and all code are unchanged.
25
+
3
26
  ## 1.75.2
4
27
 
5
28
  ### Patch Changes
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ No account, no API key, no subscription. Prefer not to install anything? Run `np
57
57
  | **One setup, every tool** | Configure Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini, and the rest from one source of truth |
58
58
  | **Workflows, not prompts** | Your team's process runs the same way every time, instead of being re-typed |
59
59
  | **Proof, not promises** | Automatic checks confirm tests, specs, docs, and security before "done" counts |
60
- | **Security as a workflow** | A full OWASP pentest pass, with retests, built in |
60
+ | **Security as a workflow** | An OWASP WSTG-structured security self-review, with retests, built in |
61
61
  | **Design as a workflow** | Your UI audited against your own design system |
62
62
  | **Docs that stay current** | The framework keeps your documentation in sync with the code |
63
63
  | **Fewer tokens, on purpose** | Loads a lean resident slice, not the whole repo. Measured 49-61% smaller resident load |
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ paqad-ai can turn the plain rules in your `docs/instructions/rules/` into small
228
228
 
229
229
  Most tools treat security as a separate scanner you remember to run. paqad-ai treats it as part of the work.
230
230
 
231
- **Security workflow.** A resumable pentest pass with full OWASP coverage, timed to the moment the industry is formalizing security for AI agents.
231
+ **Security workflow.** A resumable, OWASP WSTG-structured security self-review that hardens code before a certified pentest, timed to the moment the industry is formalizing security for AI agents.
232
232
 
233
233
  | Standard | Coverage |
234
234
  | --------------------------- | ---------------- |
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ It writes a local `curl` playbook to prove each finding (it never runs attacks f
259
259
 
260
260
  </details>
261
261
 
262
- **Design workflow.** The same rigor, pointed at the front end. The design-test pass audits your UI against your own design system, covering tokens, components, accessibility, responsive behavior, and motion, and design-retest replays the findings after you fix them. Pentest checks that the code is safe. Design-test checks that the interface is consistent.
262
+ **Design workflow.** The same rigor, pointed at the front end. The design-test pass audits your UI against your own design system, covering tokens, components, accessibility, responsive behavior, and motion, and design-retest replays the findings after you fix them. The security self-review hardens the code. Design-test checks that the interface is consistent.
263
263
 
264
264
  ## Documentation that stays current
265
265
 
package/dist/cli/index.js CHANGED
@@ -35093,7 +35093,7 @@ init_cancelled_error();
35093
35093
  init_events();
35094
35094
 
35095
35095
  // src/index.ts
35096
- var VERSION = "1.75.2";
35096
+ var VERSION = "1.75.4";
35097
35097
 
35098
35098
  // src/cli/commands/audit.ts
35099
35099
  init_esm_shims();