owflow 0.4.2 → 0.4.3

package/dist/skills/research/SKILL.md

@@ -1,249 +1,249 @@
----
-name: owflow:research
-description: Research workflow dispatcher. Initializes/resumes research tasks, derives the next step from state, and hands off to the matching /owflow:research-* subskill. Handles comprehensive research and analysis — technical, requirements, literature, and mixed research types with adaptive methodology, multi-source gathering, pattern synthesis, and evidence-based artifact outputs (findings documentation). Supports standalone research tasks and embedded research phases feeding development workflows. Use /owflow:goal-research to run all phases in one session.
-argument-hint: "[task description | task-path] [--from=<slug>] [--type=<type>]"
-user-invocable: true
----
-
-# Research Dispatcher
-
-Entry point for research tasks in **assisted mode**: initialize (or resume) the task, derive the next pending step from `orchestrator-state.yml`, print the matching subskill command, and STOP. Each `/owflow:research-*` subskill runs its steps with fresh context — the explicit invocation IS the step gate.
-
-Research state uses descriptive step slugs in `completed_phases` / `failed_phases` / `auto_fix_attempts` (NOT phase numbers): `brief-written`, `plan-created`, `findings-gathered`, `synthesis-complete`, `alternatives-generated`, `approaches-chosen`, `design-generated`, `research-completed`. The routing table below maps slugs to subskills.
-
-For the all-in-one loop with in-session `question` gates, use `/owflow:goal-research`.
-
-Gates follow the shared contract in the [Gate Contract](../orchestrator-framework/references/gate-contract.md), with the [dispatcher exception](../orchestrator-framework/references/gate-contract.md).
-
-## Input / Output Artifacts
-
-| Artifact                                       | Normal mode                                                       | Quick mode                                                                                          |
-| ---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
-| Argument (question / path)                     | research question (new task) or task path/identifier (resume)       | task path/identifier only — quick runs are never STARTED here; an interrupted quick task resumes at full fidelity |
-| `orchestrator-state.yml`                       | read on resume (artifact validation of `completed_phases`)          | read on resume — honors `entry_point: "research-quick"` and quick-lane artifacts                            |
-| Task directory + `orchestrator-state.yml` init | written (Step 3, new task) — `entry_point: "research"`              | n/a — quick bootstrap is owned by `/owflow:research-quick`                                                  |
-
-The dispatcher writes nothing else — every task artifact is produced by the subskills (see [Task Structure](#task-structure)).
-
-## Entry Gate
-
-**BEFORE deriving the handoff, complete these steps:**
-
-### Step 1: Load Framework Patterns
-
-**Read the framework reference files NOW using the Read tool:**
-
-1. The [Dispatcher & Handoff Pattern](../orchestrator-framework/references/dispatcher-handoff.md) governs this skill.
-2. The [Delegation Rules](../orchestrator-framework/references/delegation-rules.md) bound what subskills delegate.
-3. The [Orchestrator Patterns](../orchestrator-framework/references/orchestrator-patterns.md) define state schema, initialization, and context passing.
-
-### Step 2: Resolve the Argument
-
-**If the argument is a task path or identifier** (a directory, or a directory name under `.owflow/tasks/research/`) → **resume mode**:
-
-1. Read `orchestrator-state.yml`; validate expected artifacts for `completed_phases` (remove entries whose artifacts are missing)
-2. Find resume point: first step slug NOT in `completed_phases`; `--from=<slug>` overrides (validate its prerequisites exist, else use `question`)
-3. Missing state file → print: `No research task found at <path>. Run /owflow:research <question> to start from scratch.` and STOP
-
-**If the argument is a research question description** (any other free text) → new task.
-
-**If nothing is provided** → ask via `question`: "What is your research question?" (free-form answer), then WAIT. Never guess or auto-pick a task.
-
-### Step 3: Initialize (new task)
-
-**New task** (research question argument):
-
-1. **Create Task Directory**: `.owflow/tasks/research/YYYY-MM-DD-task-name/` (3-5 kebab-case words from the question)
-2. **Initialize State**: create `orchestrator-state.yml` from the research template — `task.title` / `task.description` from the question, `task.status: in_progress`, `orchestrator.task_path`, `orchestrator.entry_point: "research"` (template/bootstrap mechanic)
-   - **CRITICAL**: use the `verify_template` tool immediately after creation to check YAML validity against `orchestrator-state-research.yml`.
-3. **Create Task Items**: use `TaskCreate` for the research steps (one item per subskill handoff), then set the execution order with `TaskUpdate addBlockedBy` (plan → gather → synthesize → optional chain (user choice) → finalize). On resume, refresh the already-evidenced items instead of re-creating them.
-4. **Command flags**: `--type=TYPE` → `research_context.research_type`. Subskills read it from there.
-
-**Output**:
-
-```
-🚀 Research Dispatcher
-
-Task: [research question]
-Directory: [task-path]
-Next step: [step name]
-```
-
----
-
-## When to Use
-
-Use when:
-
-- Need comprehensive research on a topic
-- Exploring codebase patterns or architecture
-- Gathering requirements or best practices
-- Want systematic evidence-based answers
-- Research will feed into development workflows
-
-**DO NOT use for**: Development tasks, bug fixes, performance optimization.
-
----
-
-## Core Principles
-
-1. **Evidence-Based**: Every finding must have source citation
-2. **Systematic**: Follow structured methodology for consistent results
-3. **Multi-Source**: Gather from codebase, docs, config, external sources
-4. **Synthesized**: Cross-reference findings, identify patterns
-5. **Actionable**: Produce outputs that enable next steps
-
----
-
-## Routing Table (completed_phases → next subskill)
-
-Derive the FIRST step slug not in `completed_phases`, then print the matching command:
-
-| Next step (slug)                                              | Condition (from state)                                                                                          | Handoff command                          | Produces                                                   |
-| ------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
-| Brief + plan (`brief-written`, `plan-created`)                 | Always (new task or partial foundation)                                                                          | `/owflow:research-plan <task-path>`      | `planning/research-brief.md`, `research-plan.md`, `sources.md` |
-| Gather (`findings-gathered`)                                  | `plan-created` completed (gather parses `## Gathering Strategy`, or falls back to 4 default categories)           | `/owflow:research-gather <task-path>`    | `analysis/findings/*.md`                                    |
-| Synthesize (`synthesis-complete`)                             | `findings-gathered` completed                                                                                    | `/owflow:research-synthesize <task-path>` | `analysis/synthesis.md`, `outputs/research-report.md`       |
-| Optional chain (user choice)                                  | `synthesis-complete` completed — ask via `question` whether to brainstorm, design, or finalize; hand off to the chosen subskill | `/owflow:research-brainstorm` / `/owflow:research-design` / `/owflow:research-finalize <task-path>` | user's chain decision |
-| Brainstorm (`alternatives-generated`)                         | User chose brainstorming (invoking the skill IS the decision)                                                    | `/owflow:research-brainstorm <task-path>` | `outputs/solution-exploration.md`                           |
-| Converge (`approaches-chosen`)                                | `alternatives-generated` completed (brainstorm ran)                                                              | `/owflow:research-converge <task-path>`  | per-area `chosen_approach` in state (`phase_summaries.converge`) |
-| Design (`design-generated`)                                   | User chose design — after `approaches-chosen`, or as the design-only branch (seeded from the research report)     | `/owflow:research-design <task-path>`    | `outputs/high-level-design.md`, `outputs/decision-log.md`   |
-| Finalization (`research-completed`)                           | Foundation complete + optional chain settled (every step the user chose to run is recorded)                      | `/owflow:research-finalize <task-path>`  | task completed (`task.status: completed`)                   |
-
-The optional chain is the user's choice — there is no enablement flag in state and no separate decision step. When the user invokes `research-brainstorm` or `research-design`, that invocation IS the decision to run it; when they skip to `research-finalize`, the chain is settled as skipped. After `synthesis-complete` the dispatcher asks which way to go (brainstorm → converge → design, design-only, or straight to finalize).
-
-`research-completed` already in `completed_phases` → the task is TERMINAL: no handoff.
-
-This dispatcher never starts or forwards quick runs. An interrupted quick task (`entry_point: "research-quick"`, `synthesis-complete` not yet recorded) resumes at full fidelity for the missing pieces via the matching subskills. To finish that pass condensed, the user runs `/owflow:research-quick <task-path>` directly.
-
-Forking (utility, not a routing row): `/owflow:research-fork <task-path> ["<what this fork should explore>"] [--from=<slug>] [--name="..."]` copies a task with at least one completed step to a new task diverging at a chosen completed step — a bare path is enough, the skill asks for the intent, fork point, and name with suggestions drawn from that research; the directory is copied verbatim and the copied state is trimmed to continue from the fork point onwards; the source stays untouched. The fork is a plain research task from then on, routable by this dispatcher like any other.
-
-References moved into their owning subskills (read there, not here): `research-methodologies.md` lives in `research-plan/references/`, `brainstorming-techniques.md` in `research-brainstorm/references/`, `design-techniques.md` in `research-design/references/`.
-
----
-
-## Exit Gate (adapted for dispatch mode)
-
-After deriving the handoff, present the results box, ask how to proceed, then hand off accordingly (see the [dispatcher exception](../orchestrator-framework/references/gate-contract.md)). Never auto-invoke the subskill.
-
-### Results box
-
-```markdown
-## ✅ RESEARCH TASK READY — <task name>
-
-**Task** — [research question]
-**Directory** — `<task-path>`
-**Next step** — [step name]
-[Resume note: completed steps / fresh task]
-
-**Next ▸** `/owflow:research-<subskill> <task-path>`
-```
-
-### Acceptance question
-
-Use `question` — "Task ready. How would you like to proceed?" with options:
-
-- **Hand off to /owflow:research-<subskill>** — the user invokes the suggested command (dispatcher copies it to chat for convenience). Execution starts in a fresh context.
-- **Switch to autonomous mode** — illustrate with `/owflow:goal-research <task-path>` to run remaining steps in one session with gates.
-- **Adjust** — task set-up is wrong (wrong flags, wrong question, wrong task); re-run the affected initialization step, re-present the results box.
-- **Stop here** — print the resume command (`/owflow:research <task-path>`) and end.
-
-### Handoff message
-
-On Accept (hand off choice), print, then STOP:
-
-```
-✓ Research task ready at <task-path>
-
-Next step:
-  → /owflow:research-<subskill> <task-path>
-
-Other options:
-  /owflow:goal-research <task-path>   — run remaining steps in one loop
-  /owflow:research --from=<slug> <task-path>   — jump to a specific step
-```
-
----
-
-## Task Structure
-
-```
-.owflow/tasks/research/YYYY-MM-DD-research-name/
-├── orchestrator-state.yml
-├── planning/
-│   ├── research-brief.md           # research-plan (brief step)
-│   ├── research-plan.md            # research-plan (plan step)
-│   └── sources.md                  # research-plan (plan step)
-├── analysis/
-│   ├── findings/
-│   │   ├── codebase-*.md           # research-gather (per category)
-│   │   ├── docs-*.md               # research-gather
-│   │   ├── config-*.md             # research-gather
-│   │   ├── external-*.md           # research-gather
-│   │   └── [custom-category]-*.md  # research-gather (dynamic categories)
-│   └── synthesis.md                # research-synthesize (reasoning log)
-├── outputs/
-│   ├── research-report.md          # research-synthesize (main deliverable)
-│   ├── solution-exploration.md     # research-brainstorm (conditional)
-│   ├── high-level-design.md        # research-design (conditional)
-│   └── decision-log.md             # research-design (conditional)
-```
-
----
-
-## Research Types
-
-| Type             | Keywords                                 | Focus                       | Typical Outputs                   |
-| ---------------- | ---------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | --------------------------------- |
-| **Technical**    | "how does", "where is", "implementation" | Codebase analysis           | Knowledge base, architecture docs |
-| **Requirements** | "what are requirements", "user needs"    | User/business needs         | Specifications, requirements doc  |
-| **Literature**   | "best practices", "industry standards"   | External research           | Recommendations, comparisons      |
-| **Mixed**        | Multiple keywords, broad questions       | Comprehensive investigation | All output types                  |
-
----
-
-## Integration with Other Workflows
-
-### As Standalone Research
-
-**Command**: `/owflow:research [research-question | task-path]` — the dispatcher hands off step by step; `/owflow:goal-research <task-path>` runs the complete workflow in one session with interactive gates.
-
-### As Embedded Research Phase (documentation only — no wiring)
-
-> This is documentation for parent-orchestrator authors, NOT an execution path of this dispatcher: nothing here auto-invokes a parent, and no research subskill chains into development or migration steps.
-
-In the split family, a parent orchestrator (development, migration) that needs research sequences the research subskills directly via the Skill tool — plan → gather → synthesize → the optional chain as chosen by the user — and SKIPS `research-finalize`-style completion: the parent handles next steps and keeps control of the flow. Design artifacts feed the parent's specification phase; the research report is saved in the parent task's `analysis/research/` context per the parent's own state setup.
-
-**Handoff fields the parent reads**: refer to `research_outputs.*` in the template [src/templates/orchestrator-state-research.yml](../../templates/orchestrator-state-research.yml).
-
-Full autonomous research (research as its own goal, every gate honored) = `/owflow:goal-research`. A `--no-exit` flag for embedded runs is deferred — not part of this design.
-
----
-
-## Auto-Recovery
-
-Retries are owned by each subskill (each `/owflow:research-*` SKILL.md carries its own max attempts and strategy).
-
----
-
-## Command Flags
-
-| Flag                              | Effect                                                                              |
-| --------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
-| `--from=<slug>`                   | Hand off (resume mode) from a specific step slug                                     |
-| `--type=<type>`                   | Force the research type classification ("technical \| requirements \| literature \| mixed") |
-
-There is deliberately NO quick entry on this dispatcher — condensed quick starts go through `/owflow:research-quick`, whose artifacts this routing table honors on every row.
-
----
-
-## Command Integration
-
-Invoked via:
-
-- `/owflow:research [question] [--type=TYPE]` (new)
-- `/owflow:research [task-path] [--from=<slug>]` (resume)
-
-Alternative: `/owflow:goal-research <task-path>` — same task lifecycle, all subskills invoked in one session with `question` gates.
-
-Task directory: `.owflow/tasks/research/YYYY-MM-DD-task-name/`
+---
+name: owflow:research
+description: Research workflow dispatcher. Initializes/resumes research tasks, derives the next step from state, and hands off to the matching /owflow:research-* subskill. Handles comprehensive research and analysis — technical, requirements, literature, and mixed research types with adaptive methodology, multi-source gathering, pattern synthesis, and evidence-based artifact outputs (findings documentation). Supports standalone research tasks and embedded research phases feeding development workflows. Use /owflow:goal-research to run all phases in one session.
+argument-hint: "[task description | task-path] [--from=<slug>] [--type=<type>]"
+user-invocable: true
+---
+
+# Research Dispatcher
+
+Entry point for research tasks in **assisted mode**: initialize (or resume) the task, derive the next pending step from `orchestrator-state.yml`, print the matching subskill command, and STOP. Each `/owflow:research-*` subskill runs its steps with fresh context — the explicit invocation IS the step gate.
+
+Research state uses descriptive step slugs in `completed_phases` / `failed_phases` / `auto_fix_attempts` (NOT phase numbers): `brief-written`, `plan-created`, `findings-gathered`, `synthesis-complete`, `alternatives-generated`, `approaches-chosen`, `design-generated`, `research-completed`. The routing table below maps slugs to subskills.
+
+For the all-in-one loop with in-session `question` gates, use `/owflow:goal-research`.
+
+Gates follow the shared contract in the [Gate Contract](../orchestrator-framework/references/gate-contract.md), with the [dispatcher exception](../orchestrator-framework/references/gate-contract.md).
+
+## Input / Output Artifacts
+
+| Artifact                                       | Normal mode                                                       | Quick mode                                                                                          |
+| ---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| Argument (question / path)                     | research question (new task) or task path/identifier (resume)       | task path/identifier only — quick runs are never STARTED here; an interrupted quick task resumes at full fidelity |
+| `orchestrator-state.yml`                       | read on resume (artifact validation of `completed_phases`)          | read on resume — honors `entry_point: "research-quick"` and quick-lane artifacts                            |
+| Task directory + `orchestrator-state.yml` init | written (Step 3, new task) — `entry_point: "research"`              | n/a — quick bootstrap is owned by `/owflow:research-quick`                                                  |
+
+The dispatcher writes nothing else — every task artifact is produced by the subskills (see [Task Structure](#task-structure)).
+
+## Entry Gate
+
+**BEFORE deriving the handoff, complete these steps:**
+
+### Step 1: Load Framework Patterns
+
+**Read the framework reference files NOW using the Read tool:**
+
+1. The [Dispatcher & Handoff Pattern](../orchestrator-framework/references/dispatcher-handoff.md) governs this skill.
+2. The [Delegation Rules](../orchestrator-framework/references/delegation-rules.md) bound what subskills delegate.
+3. The [Orchestrator Patterns](../orchestrator-framework/references/orchestrator-patterns.md) define state schema, initialization, and context passing.
+
+### Step 2: Resolve the Argument
+
+**If the argument is a task path or identifier** (a directory, or a directory name under `.owflow/tasks/research/`) → **resume mode**:
+
+1. Read `orchestrator-state.yml`; validate expected artifacts for `completed_phases` (remove entries whose artifacts are missing)
+2. Find resume point: first step slug NOT in `completed_phases`; `--from=<slug>` overrides (validate its prerequisites exist, else use `question`)
+3. Missing state file → print: `No research task found at <path>. Run /owflow:research <question> to start from scratch.` and STOP
+
+**If the argument is a research question description** (any other free text) → new task.
+
+**If nothing is provided** → ask via `question`: "What is your research question?" (free-form answer), then WAIT. Never guess or auto-pick a task.
+
+### Step 3: Initialize (new task)
+
+**New task** (research question argument):
+
+1. **Create Task Directory**: `.owflow/tasks/research/YYYY-MM-DD-task-name/` (3-5 kebab-case words from the question)
+2. **Initialize State**: create `orchestrator-state.yml` from the research template — `task.title` / `task.description` from the question, `task.status: in_progress`, `orchestrator.task_path`, `orchestrator.entry_point: "research"` (template/bootstrap mechanic)
+   - **CRITICAL**: use the `verify_template` tool immediately after creation to check YAML validity against `orchestrator-state-research.yml`.
+3. **Create Task Items**: use `TaskCreate` for the research steps (one item per subskill handoff), then set the execution order with `TaskUpdate addBlockedBy` (plan → gather → synthesize → optional chain (user choice) → finalize). On resume, refresh the already-evidenced items instead of re-creating them.
+4. **Command flags**: `--type=TYPE` → `research_context.research_type`. Subskills read it from there.
+
+**Output**:
+
+```
+🚀 Research Dispatcher
+
+Task: [research question]
+Directory: [task-path]
+Next step: [step name]
+```
+
+---
+
+## When to Use
+
+Use when:
+
+- Need comprehensive research on a topic
+- Exploring codebase patterns or architecture
+- Gathering requirements or best practices
+- Want systematic evidence-based answers
+- Research will feed into development workflows
+
+**DO NOT use for**: Development tasks, bug fixes, performance optimization.
+
+---
+
+## Core Principles
+
+1. **Evidence-Based**: Every finding must have source citation
+2. **Systematic**: Follow structured methodology for consistent results
+3. **Multi-Source**: Gather from codebase, docs, config, external sources
+4. **Synthesized**: Cross-reference findings, identify patterns
+5. **Actionable**: Produce outputs that enable next steps
+
+---
+
+## Routing Table (completed_phases → next subskill)
+
+Derive the FIRST step slug not in `completed_phases`, then print the matching command:
+
+| Next step (slug)                                              | Condition (from state)                                                                                          | Handoff command                          | Produces                                                   |
+| ------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
+| Brief + plan (`brief-written`, `plan-created`)                 | Always (new task or partial foundation)                                                                          | `/owflow:research-plan <task-path>`      | `planning/research-brief.md`, `research-plan.md`, `sources.md` |
+| Gather (`findings-gathered`)                                  | `plan-created` completed (gather parses `## Gathering Strategy`, or falls back to 4 default categories)           | `/owflow:research-gather <task-path>`    | `analysis/findings/*.md`                                    |
+| Synthesize (`synthesis-complete`)                             | `findings-gathered` completed                                                                                    | `/owflow:research-synthesize <task-path>` | `analysis/synthesis.md`, `outputs/research-report.md`       |
+| Optional chain (user choice)                                  | `synthesis-complete` completed — ask via `question` whether to brainstorm, design, or finalize; hand off to the chosen subskill | `/owflow:research-brainstorm` / `/owflow:research-design` / `/owflow:research-finalize <task-path>` | user's chain decision |
+| Brainstorm (`alternatives-generated`)                         | User chose brainstorming (invoking the skill IS the decision)                                                    | `/owflow:research-brainstorm <task-path>` | `outputs/solution-exploration.md`                           |
+| Converge (`approaches-chosen`)                                | `alternatives-generated` completed (brainstorm ran)                                                              | `/owflow:research-converge <task-path>`  | per-area `chosen_approach` in state (`phase_summaries.converge`) |
+| Design (`design-generated`)                                   | User chose design — after `approaches-chosen`, or as the design-only branch (seeded from the research report)     | `/owflow:research-design <task-path>`    | `outputs/high-level-design.md`, `outputs/decision-log.md`   |
+| Finalization (`research-completed`)                           | Foundation complete + optional chain settled (every step the user chose to run is recorded)                      | `/owflow:research-finalize <task-path>`  | task completed (`task.status: completed`)                   |
+
+The optional chain is the user's choice — there is no enablement flag in state and no separate decision step. When the user invokes `research-brainstorm` or `research-design`, that invocation IS the decision to run it; when they skip to `research-finalize`, the chain is settled as skipped. After `synthesis-complete` the dispatcher asks which way to go (brainstorm → converge → design, design-only, or straight to finalize).
+
+`research-completed` already in `completed_phases` → the task is TERMINAL: no handoff.
+
+This dispatcher never starts or forwards quick runs. An interrupted quick task (`entry_point: "research-quick"`, `synthesis-complete` not yet recorded) resumes at full fidelity for the missing pieces via the matching subskills. To finish that pass condensed, the user runs `/owflow:research-quick <task-path>` directly.
+
+Forking (utility, not a routing row): `/owflow:research-fork <task-path> ["<what this fork should explore>"] [--from=<slug>] [--name="..."]` copies a task with at least one completed step to a new task diverging at a chosen completed step — a bare path is enough, the skill asks for the intent, fork point, and name with suggestions drawn from that research; the directory is copied verbatim and the copied state is trimmed to continue from the fork point onwards; the source stays untouched. The fork is a plain research task from then on, routable by this dispatcher like any other.
+
+References moved into their owning subskills (read there, not here): `research-methodologies.md` lives in `research-plan/references/`, `brainstorming-techniques.md` in `research-brainstorm/references/`, `design-techniques.md` in `research-design/references/`.
+
+---
+
+## Exit Gate (adapted for dispatch mode)
+
+After deriving the handoff, present the results box, ask how to proceed, then hand off accordingly (see the [dispatcher exception](../orchestrator-framework/references/gate-contract.md)). Never auto-invoke the subskill.
+
+### Results box
+
+```markdown
+## ✅ RESEARCH TASK READY — <task name>
+
+**Task** — [research question]
+**Directory** — `<task-path>`
+**Next step** — [step name]
+[Resume note: completed steps / fresh task]
+
+**Next ▸** `/owflow:research-<subskill> <task-path>`
+```
+
+### Acceptance question
+
+Use `question` — "Task ready. How would you like to proceed?" with options:
+
+- **Hand off to /owflow:research-<subskill>** — the user invokes the suggested command (dispatcher copies it to chat for convenience). Execution starts in a fresh context.
+- **Switch to autonomous mode** — illustrate with `/owflow:goal-research <task-path>` to run remaining steps in one session with gates.
+- **Adjust** — task set-up is wrong (wrong flags, wrong question, wrong task); re-run the affected initialization step, re-present the results box.
+- **Stop here** — print the resume command (`/owflow:research <task-path>`) and end.
+
+### Handoff message
+
+On Accept (hand off choice), print, then STOP:
+
+```
+✓ Research task ready at <task-path>
+
+Next step:
+  → /owflow:research-<subskill> <task-path>
+
+Other options:
+  /owflow:goal-research <task-path>   — run remaining steps in one loop
+  /owflow:research --from=<slug> <task-path>   — jump to a specific step
+```
+
+---
+
+## Task Structure
+
+```
+.owflow/tasks/research/YYYY-MM-DD-research-name/
+├── orchestrator-state.yml
+├── planning/
+│   ├── research-brief.md           # research-plan (brief step)
+│   ├── research-plan.md            # research-plan (plan step)
+│   └── sources.md                  # research-plan (plan step)
+├── analysis/
+│   ├── findings/
+│   │   ├── codebase-*.md           # research-gather (per category)
+│   │   ├── docs-*.md               # research-gather
+│   │   ├── config-*.md             # research-gather
+│   │   ├── external-*.md           # research-gather
+│   │   └── [custom-category]-*.md  # research-gather (dynamic categories)
+│   └── synthesis.md                # research-synthesize (reasoning log)
+├── outputs/
+│   ├── research-report.md          # research-synthesize (main deliverable)
+│   ├── solution-exploration.md     # research-brainstorm (conditional)
+│   ├── high-level-design.md        # research-design (conditional)
+│   └── decision-log.md             # research-design (conditional)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Research Types
+
+| Type             | Keywords                                 | Focus                       | Typical Outputs                   |
+| ---------------- | ---------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | --------------------------------- |
+| **Technical**    | "how does", "where is", "implementation" | Codebase analysis           | Knowledge base, architecture docs |
+| **Requirements** | "what are requirements", "user needs"    | User/business needs         | Specifications, requirements doc  |
+| **Literature**   | "best practices", "industry standards"   | External research           | Recommendations, comparisons      |
+| **Mixed**        | Multiple keywords, broad questions       | Comprehensive investigation | All output types                  |
+
+---
+
+## Integration with Other Workflows
+
+### As Standalone Research
+
+**Command**: `/owflow:research [research-question | task-path]` — the dispatcher hands off step by step; `/owflow:goal-research <task-path>` runs the complete workflow in one session with interactive gates.
+
+### As Embedded Research Phase (documentation only — no wiring)
+
+> This is documentation for parent-orchestrator authors, NOT an execution path of this dispatcher: nothing here auto-invokes a parent, and no research subskill chains into development or migration steps.
+
+In the split family, a parent orchestrator (development, migration) that needs research sequences the research subskills directly via the Skill tool — plan → gather → synthesize → the optional chain as chosen by the user — and SKIPS `research-finalize`-style completion: the parent handles next steps and keeps control of the flow. Design artifacts feed the parent's specification phase; the research report is saved in the parent task's `analysis/research/` context per the parent's own state setup.
+
+**Handoff fields the parent reads**: refer to `research_outputs.*` in the template [src/templates/orchestrator-state-research.yml](../../templates/orchestrator-state-research.yml).
+
+Full autonomous research (research as its own goal, every gate honored) = `/owflow:goal-research`. A `--no-exit` flag for embedded runs is deferred — not part of this design.
+
+---
+
+## Auto-Recovery
+
+Retries are owned by each subskill (each `/owflow:research-*` SKILL.md carries its own max attempts and strategy).
+
+---
+
+## Command Flags
+
+| Flag                              | Effect                                                                              |
+| --------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| `--from=<slug>`                   | Hand off (resume mode) from a specific step slug                                     |
+| `--type=<type>`                   | Force the research type classification ("technical \| requirements \| literature \| mixed") |
+
+There is deliberately NO quick entry on this dispatcher — condensed quick starts go through `/owflow:research-quick`, whose artifacts this routing table honors on every row.
+
+---
+
+## Command Integration
+
+Invoked via:
+
+- `/owflow:research [question] [--type=TYPE]` (new)
+- `/owflow:research [task-path] [--from=<slug>]` (resume)
+
+Alternative: `/owflow:goal-research <task-path>` — same task lifecycle, all subskills invoked in one session with `question` gates.
+
+Task directory: `.owflow/tasks/research/YYYY-MM-DD-task-name/`