oss-signal 0.3.0 → 0.5.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,25 @@
1
1
  # Changelog
2
2
 
3
+ ## Unreleased
4
+
5
+ ## 0.5.1
6
+
7
+ - Published the Issue-ready output release on a clean tag after release workflow hardening.
8
+ - Guarded automatic npm publishing behind an explicit repository variable.
9
+
10
+ ## 0.5.0
11
+
12
+ - Added `--format issue` for generating human-reviewed GitHub Issue bodies from audit findings.
13
+ - Added an issue-output example and maintainer playbook guidance for audit-to-issue workflows.
14
+
15
+ ## 0.4.0
16
+
17
+ - Added a maintainer playbook for audit-to-issue, PR, CI gate, and SARIF workflows.
18
+ - Added a documented release process and tag-triggered release workflow with npm dry-run verification.
19
+
20
+ - Added SARIF output for GitHub Code Scanning and other security dashboards.
21
+ - Added Action support for `format: sarif`.
22
+
3
23
  ## 0.3.0
4
24
 
5
25
  - Added GitHub Actions step summary output for readable workflow reports.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -2,13 +2,14 @@
2
2
 
3
3
  [![CI](https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
4
4
  [![Repository health](https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/repository-health.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/repository-health.yml)
5
+ [![GitHub release](https://img.shields.io/github/v/release/SalmonPlays/oss-signal.svg)](https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/releases/latest)
5
6
  [![npm version](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/oss-signal.svg)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/oss-signal)
6
7
  [![npm downloads](https://img.shields.io/npm/dm/oss-signal.svg)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/oss-signal)
7
8
  [![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-green.svg)](LICENSE)
8
9
 
9
10
  `oss-signal` is a dependency-light CLI for auditing open-source repository maintenance readiness.
10
11
 
11
- It checks the files and automation that reduce maintainer load: README, license, contributing guide, security policy, CI, tests, issue templates, pull request templates, Dependabot, and release notes. The output is a score plus concrete next steps in Markdown or JSON.
12
+ It checks the files and automation that reduce maintainer load: README, license, contributing guide, security policy, CI, tests, issue templates, pull request templates, Dependabot, and release notes. The output is a score plus concrete next steps in Markdown, JSON, SARIF, or a GitHub Issue-ready Markdown body.
12
13
 
13
14
  ![oss-signal example output](docs/assets/terminal-report.svg)
14
15
 
@@ -24,12 +25,20 @@ Open-source projects often fail quietly because the maintainer workflow is undoc
24
25
  - Foundations and working groups can compare repository hygiene across many projects.
25
26
  - CI maintainers can add it as a GitHub Action, show the score in the workflow summary, and publish the report as an artifact.
26
27
 
28
+ See [docs/maintainer-playbook.md](docs/maintainer-playbook.md) for a concrete maintainer workflow from audit to issue, PR, CI gate, and Code Scanning evidence.
29
+
27
30
  ## Install
28
31
 
29
32
  ```bash
30
33
  npm install --global oss-signal
31
34
  ```
32
35
 
36
+ Try it without installing:
37
+
38
+ ```bash
39
+ npx oss-signal SalmonPlays/oss-signal
40
+ ```
41
+
33
42
  For local development:
34
43
 
35
44
  ```bash
@@ -66,12 +75,24 @@ Use JSON in automation:
66
75
  oss-signal . --format json --fail-under 80
67
76
  ```
68
77
 
78
+ Write SARIF for GitHub Code Scanning or other dashboards:
79
+
80
+ ```bash
81
+ oss-signal . --format sarif --output oss-signal.sarif
82
+ ```
83
+
69
84
  Generate a report that can be attached to an issue:
70
85
 
71
86
  ```bash
72
87
  oss-signal . --format markdown --output docs/maintainer-readiness.md
73
88
  ```
74
89
 
90
+ Generate a maintainer-friendly issue body:
91
+
92
+ ```bash
93
+ oss-signal platformatic/massimo --format issue --output maintainer-follow-up.md
94
+ ```
95
+
75
96
  ## Checks
76
97
 
77
98
  `oss-signal` currently checks:
@@ -82,11 +103,13 @@ oss-signal . --format markdown --output docs/maintainer-readiness.md
82
103
 
83
104
  See [docs/rules.md](docs/rules.md) for rule details and scoring weights.
84
105
 
106
+ SARIF output reports failed maintainer-readiness checks as warning-level results. This lets teams upload the audit to code scanning dashboards while keeping the Markdown report available for maintainers. Issue output turns the same findings into a human-reviewed checklist that can be edited before posting.
107
+
85
108
  For GitHub URL audits, `oss-signal` reads the repository file tree through the GitHub API and also uses GitHub's community profile signal when available. This lets it detect organization-level files such as a shared code of conduct.
86
109
 
87
110
  ## Real Output
88
111
 
89
- This repository audits itself at **100/100 (A)**:
112
+ This repository audits itself at **100/100 (A)** and dogfoods the public GitHub Action:
90
113
 
91
114
  ```text
92
115
  Score: 100/100 (A)
@@ -97,7 +120,9 @@ Summary:
97
120
  - Total checks: 15
98
121
  ```
99
122
 
100
- See [docs/self-audit.md](docs/self-audit.md) for the full local self-audit report and [docs/examples/github-url-report.md](docs/examples/github-url-report.md) for the GitHub URL audit output.
123
+ See [docs/self-audit.md](docs/self-audit.md) for the full local self-audit report, [docs/examples/github-url-report.md](docs/examples/github-url-report.md) for the GitHub URL audit output, [docs/examples/github-issue-body.md](docs/examples/github-issue-body.md) for issue output, and [docs/examples/self-audit.sarif](docs/examples/self-audit.sarif) for SARIF output.
124
+
125
+ The [Repository health workflow](.github/workflows/repository-health.yml) runs `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1`, uploads the Markdown report as an artifact, and uploads SARIF to GitHub Code Scanning on non-PR runs.
101
126
 
102
127
  ## Field Audits
103
128
 
@@ -111,6 +136,8 @@ See [docs/outreach](docs/outreach) for the reports and draft issue text. Drafts
111
136
 
112
137
  For a compact maintainer/adoption summary, see [docs/adoption-evidence.md](docs/adoption-evidence.md).
113
138
 
139
+ Separate public workflow evidence: [SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo](https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo) runs `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.4.0` and produced a successful [workflow run](https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo/actions/runs/26862361229) with a report artifact.
140
+
114
141
  ## Example Recommendation Output
115
142
 
116
143
  ```text
@@ -138,7 +165,7 @@ oss-signal . --fail-under 80
138
165
  Add `oss-signal` directly to a GitHub Actions workflow:
139
166
 
140
167
  ```yaml
141
- - uses: SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.3.0
168
+ - uses: SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1
142
169
  id: oss-signal
143
170
  with:
144
171
  fail-under: "80"
@@ -151,6 +178,16 @@ The Action writes a concise GitHub Actions step summary by default, so reviewers
151
178
 
152
179
  ![oss-signal GitHub Actions summary](docs/assets/github-step-summary.svg)
153
180
 
181
+ Generate an editable Issue body from CI:
182
+
183
+ ```yaml
184
+ - uses: SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1
185
+ with:
186
+ format: issue
187
+ output: maintainer-follow-up.md
188
+ summary: "true"
189
+ ```
190
+
154
191
  Full workflow example:
155
192
 
156
193
  ```yaml
@@ -166,7 +203,7 @@ jobs:
166
203
  runs-on: ubuntu-latest
167
204
  steps:
168
205
  - uses: actions/checkout@v4
169
- - uses: SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.3.0
206
+ - uses: SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1
170
207
  id: oss-signal
171
208
  with:
172
209
  fail-under: "80"
@@ -178,9 +215,28 @@ jobs:
178
215
  path: oss-signal-report.md
179
216
  ```
180
217
 
181
- See [docs/examples/github-action-workflow.yml](docs/examples/github-action-workflow.yml) for a copyable workflow.
218
+ See [docs/examples/github-action-workflow.yml](docs/examples/github-action-workflow.yml) for a copyable workflow and [docs/examples/github-code-scanning-workflow.yml](docs/examples/github-code-scanning-workflow.yml) for a workflow that uploads SARIF to GitHub Code Scanning.
219
+
220
+ Upload SARIF to GitHub Code Scanning:
182
221
 
183
- This repository dogfoods the public Action tag in [Repository health](.github/workflows/repository-health.yml), which runs `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.3.0` against the repository and uploads the Markdown report artifact.
222
+ ```yaml
223
+ permissions:
224
+ contents: read
225
+ security-events: write
226
+
227
+ steps:
228
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
229
+ - uses: SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1
230
+ with:
231
+ format: sarif
232
+ output: oss-signal.sarif
233
+ summary: "true"
234
+ - uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
235
+ with:
236
+ sarif_file: oss-signal.sarif
237
+ ```
238
+
239
+ This repository dogfoods the public Action tag in [Repository health](.github/workflows/repository-health.yml), which runs `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1` against the repository, uploads the Markdown report artifact, and publishes SARIF to Code Scanning on non-PR runs.
184
240
 
185
241
  You can also run the CLI directly in CI:
186
242
 
@@ -197,8 +253,13 @@ You can also run the CLI directly in CI:
197
253
  ## Roadmap
198
254
 
199
255
  - Ecosystem-specific profiles for Python, Rust, Go, and JavaScript packages
200
- - SARIF output for code scanning dashboards
201
- - Rules for release automation and provenance metadata
256
+ - Release automation and provenance metadata checks
257
+ - Maintainer score trends over time
258
+ - Organization-level repository inventory reports
259
+
260
+ ## Release Process
261
+
262
+ Releases use the checklist in [docs/release-process.md](docs/release-process.md). The repository also includes a tag-triggered [release workflow](.github/workflows/release.yml) that verifies the package, runs `npm publish --dry-run`, and can publish to npm with provenance when `NPM_TOKEN` is configured.
202
263
 
203
264
  ## Contributing
204
265
 
package/action.yml CHANGED
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ inputs:
10
10
  required: false
11
11
  default: "."
12
12
  format:
13
- description: Output format, either markdown or json.
13
+ description: Output format, either markdown, json, sarif, or issue.
14
14
  required: false
15
15
  default: markdown
16
16
  output:
@@ -5,14 +5,21 @@ This page collects the public evidence that `oss-signal` is built for real open-
5
5
  ## Project Links
6
6
 
7
7
  - Repository: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal
8
- - npm package: https://www.npmjs.com/package/oss-signal
9
- - GitHub Action tag: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/tree/v0.3.0
8
+ - npm package: https://www.npmjs.com/package/oss-signal (`0.5.1` latest)
9
+ - GitHub Release: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/releases/tag/v0.5.1
10
+ - GitHub Action tag: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/tree/v0.5.1
10
11
  - GitHub Action metadata: [action.yml](../action.yml)
11
12
  - Public dogfood workflow: [.github/workflows/repository-health.yml](../.github/workflows/repository-health.yml)
13
+ - Separate public workflow demo: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo
14
+ - Separate public workflow run: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo/actions/runs/26862361229
12
15
  - Self-audit report: [docs/self-audit.md](self-audit.md)
16
+ - SARIF self-audit output: [docs/examples/self-audit.sarif](examples/self-audit.sarif)
13
17
  - GitHub URL audit report: [docs/examples/github-url-report.md](examples/github-url-report.md)
14
18
  - GitHub Action workflow example: [docs/examples/github-action-workflow.yml](examples/github-action-workflow.yml)
19
+ - Maintainer playbook: [docs/maintainer-playbook.md](maintainer-playbook.md)
20
+ - Release process: [docs/release-process.md](release-process.md)
15
21
  - Codex for Open Source application brief: [docs/codex-for-oss-application.md](codex-for-oss-application.md)
22
+ - Codex for Open Source form answers: [docs/codex-for-oss-form-answers.md](codex-for-oss-form-answers.md)
16
23
  - Rule reference: [docs/rules.md](rules.md)
17
24
 
18
25
  ## Maintainer Use Case
@@ -24,7 +31,19 @@ The CLI supports two practical modes:
24
31
  - Local repository audit for maintainers working in a clone.
25
32
  - Public GitHub repository audit for quick triage without cloning.
26
33
 
27
- It also ships as a GitHub Action, so maintainers can gate repository hygiene in CI, show the result in the GitHub Actions step summary, and upload a Markdown report as a workflow artifact. This repository dogfoods the public Action tag through the Repository health workflow.
34
+ It also ships as a GitHub Action, so maintainers can gate repository hygiene in CI, show the result in the GitHub Actions step summary, upload a Markdown report as a workflow artifact, and upload failed maintainer-readiness checks as SARIF for GitHub Code Scanning. This repository dogfoods the public Action tag through the Repository health workflow.
35
+
36
+ The [maintainer playbook](maintainer-playbook.md) documents the end-to-end workflow from audit to issue, pull request, CI gate, and Code Scanning evidence. The [release process](release-process.md) documents pre-release verification, tag consistency, npm publish checks, and post-release smoke tests.
37
+
38
+ ## Separate Public Workflow Evidence
39
+
40
+ The public repository https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo runs `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.4.0` from a separate workflow file:
41
+
42
+ - Workflow file: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo/blob/main/.github/workflows/oss-signal.yml
43
+ - Successful workflow run: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo/actions/runs/26862361229
44
+ - Artifact: `oss-signal-adoption-demo-report`, containing `oss-signal-report.md` and `oss-signal.sarif`
45
+
46
+ This is not claimed as independent third-party adoption because the repository is owned by `SalmonPlays`. It is evidence that the public `v0.4.0` Action tag works outside the main repository and can publish maintainer-readiness reports from another public workflow.
28
47
 
29
48
  ## Public Field Audits And PRs
30
49
 
@@ -45,16 +64,19 @@ From this repository:
45
64
  ```bash
46
65
  npm run check
47
66
  npm run audit:github
67
+ node src/cli.js . --format sarif --output docs/examples/self-audit.sarif
48
68
  node src/cli.js platformatic/massimo --format json
69
+ npm exec --yes --package=oss-signal@0.5.1 -- oss-signal SalmonPlays/oss-signal --format json
49
70
  ```
50
71
 
51
- The current repository self-audit score is 100/100, the GitHub community profile health score is 100, and CI verifies the local GitHub Action wrapper.
72
+ The current repository self-audit score is 100/100, the GitHub community profile health score is 100, and CI verifies the local GitHub Action wrapper. The public `v0.5.1` Action tag is used by the repository health workflow for Markdown and SARIF output. The published npm `0.5.1` package has also been executed from a clean temporary directory against the public GitHub repository, returning 100/100 (A).
52
73
 
53
74
  Public CI evidence:
54
75
 
55
76
  - CI workflow: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/ci.yml
56
77
  - Repository health workflow: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/repository-health.yml
57
78
  - CodeQL workflow: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/codeql.yml
79
+ - Separate workflow demo run: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo/actions/runs/26862361229
58
80
 
59
81
  ## Boundaries
60
82
 
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  # Codex for Open Source Application Brief
2
2
 
3
- Snapshot: 2026-06-02T11:20:40Z
3
+ Snapshot: 2026-06-03T05:11:50Z
4
4
 
5
5
  This document summarizes why `oss-signal` is a fit for OpenAI's Codex for Open Source program. The official program page says open-source maintainers can apply, with emphasis on core maintainers, widely used public projects, and projects that play an important ecosystem role: https://developers.openai.com/community/codex-for-oss
6
6
 
@@ -8,11 +8,16 @@ This document summarizes why `oss-signal` is a fit for OpenAI's Codex for Open S
8
8
 
9
9
  - Repository: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal
10
10
  - npm package: https://www.npmjs.com/package/oss-signal
11
- - GitHub Action tag: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/tree/v0.3.0
11
+ - GitHub Release: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/releases/tag/v0.5.1
12
+ - GitHub Action tag: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/tree/v0.5.1
12
13
  - CI workflow: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/ci.yml
13
14
  - Repository health workflow: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/repository-health.yml
14
15
  - CodeQL workflow: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/codeql.yml
16
+ - Separate public workflow demo: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo/actions/runs/26862361229
15
17
  - Maintainer evidence: [adoption-evidence.md](adoption-evidence.md)
18
+ - Form answer pack: [codex-for-oss-form-answers.md](codex-for-oss-form-answers.md)
19
+ - Maintainer playbook: [maintainer-playbook.md](maintainer-playbook.md)
20
+ - Release process: [release-process.md](release-process.md)
16
21
 
17
22
  ## What `oss-signal` Does
18
23
 
@@ -22,7 +27,7 @@ This document summarizes why `oss-signal` is a fit for OpenAI's Codex for Open S
22
27
  - CI, tests, issue templates, pull request templates, Dependabot, and CodeQL-style security workflow.
23
28
  - Package metadata and lockfile hygiene.
24
29
 
25
- The output is a deterministic score plus actionable next steps in Markdown or JSON. The GitHub Action also writes a workflow step summary so maintainers and reviewers can see the result without downloading an artifact.
30
+ The output is a deterministic score plus actionable next steps in Markdown, JSON, or SARIF. The GitHub Action also writes a workflow step summary so maintainers and reviewers can see the result without downloading an artifact.
26
31
 
27
32
  ## Why Codex Helps
28
33
 
@@ -31,6 +36,7 @@ This project is designed around repeatable maintainer workflows where Codex is u
31
36
  - Run audits against public repositories without cloning.
32
37
  - Convert findings into focused cleanup issues or pull requests.
33
38
  - Keep repository hygiene visible in CI.
39
+ - Upload failed maintainer-readiness checks to GitHub Code Scanning through SARIF.
34
40
  - Generate small contributor-facing files that maintainers can review quickly.
35
41
  - Use Codex to turn audit findings into scoped documentation and workflow improvements.
36
42
 
@@ -38,14 +44,26 @@ This project is designed around repeatable maintainer workflows where Codex is u
38
44
 
39
45
  The repository currently has:
40
46
 
41
- - A published npm package.
47
+ - A published npm package with `0.5.1` as the latest release.
48
+ - A published GitHub Release for v0.5.1 with issue-output release notes and CI usage guidance.
42
49
  - A reusable GitHub Action with `score`, `grade`, `failed`, and `report-path` outputs.
43
- - A v0.3.0 GitHub Action tag with step summary support.
44
- - A public dogfood workflow that runs `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.3.0` against the repository.
50
+ - SARIF output for GitHub Code Scanning integration.
51
+ - A v0.5.1 GitHub Action tag with step summary, SARIF support, and Issue-ready output.
52
+ - A public dogfood workflow that runs `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1` against the repository, uploads the Markdown report artifact, and uploads SARIF to GitHub Code Scanning on non-PR runs.
53
+ - A separate public workflow demo that runs `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.4.0` from another repository and uploads a report artifact.
54
+ - A maintainer playbook that documents audit, triage, issue, PR, CI, and SARIF workflows.
55
+ - A release process and tag-triggered release workflow that verify package contents and support npm provenance publishing when repository secrets are configured.
45
56
  - CI and CodeQL workflows passing on `main`.
46
57
  - A local self-audit score of 100/100.
58
+ - A clean-directory smoke test of `npm exec --yes --package=oss-signal@0.5.1 -- oss-signal SalmonPlays/oss-signal --format json`, returning 100/100 (A).
47
59
  - Public reports, issues, and PRs created from real repository audits.
48
60
 
61
+ ## Separate Workflow Demo
62
+
63
+ The repository https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo runs the public `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.4.0` Action tag from a separate workflow. The successful run at https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo/actions/runs/26862361229 uploaded an `oss-signal-adoption-demo-report` artifact containing Markdown and SARIF output.
64
+
65
+ This is intentionally described as a separate public workflow demo rather than third-party adoption because the repository is also owned by `SalmonPlays`. It still proves that the published Action tag is consumable outside the main repository.
66
+
49
67
  ## Field Audits And Follow-Up PRs
50
68
 
51
69
  | Repository | Report | Issue | PR | Status |
@@ -62,15 +80,16 @@ Recommended application angle:
62
80
 
63
81
  `oss-signal` is not yet a widely adopted project, but it is a public OSS maintainer tool built specifically for repeatable Codex-assisted maintenance. The project already has a working CLI, npm distribution, GitHub Action, passing CI/CodeQL, self-audit evidence, and three public field-audit PRs. Codex support would be used to continue auditing repositories, prepare focused maintainer PRs, improve Action automation, and document repeatable OSS maintenance workflows.
64
82
 
83
+ Prepared official form answers are in [codex-for-oss-form-answers.md](codex-for-oss-form-answers.md). The applicant still needs to fill personal identity fields and their OpenAI Organization ID directly.
84
+
65
85
  ## Current Gaps
66
86
 
67
87
  - External PRs are open but not yet merged.
68
88
  - npm download metrics are still early because the package is newly published.
69
- - The project needs more real maintainers using the Action in their own repositories.
89
+ - The project needs independent maintainer-owned repositories using the Action in their own workflows.
70
90
 
71
91
  ## Next Evidence To Collect
72
92
 
73
93
  - One or more merged external PRs.
74
- - A GitHub Release for v0.3.0 with release notes.
75
- - A public workflow run in another repository using `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.3.0`.
94
+ - A public workflow run in an independent maintainer-owned repository using `SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1`, ideally with SARIF upload enabled.
76
95
  - npm download data once the registry starts reporting weekly/monthly counts.
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
1
+ # Codex for Open Source Form Answers
2
+
3
+ Snapshot: 2026-06-03T05:11:50Z
4
+
5
+ This page prepares concise answers for the official Codex for Open Source application form: https://openai.com/form/codex-for-oss/
6
+
7
+ The official form asks for personal identity fields that must be filled by the applicant:
8
+
9
+ - First name
10
+ - Last name
11
+ - Email associated with the applicant's ChatGPT account
12
+ - OpenAI Organization ID
13
+
14
+ ## First Name
15
+
16
+ ```text
17
+ Fill manually.
18
+ ```
19
+
20
+ ## Last Name
21
+
22
+ ```text
23
+ Fill manually.
24
+ ```
25
+
26
+ ## Email
27
+
28
+ ```text
29
+ Fill manually with the email associated with the applicant's ChatGPT account.
30
+ ```
31
+
32
+ ## GitHub Username
33
+
34
+ ```text
35
+ SalmonPlays
36
+ ```
37
+
38
+ ## GitHub Repository URL
39
+
40
+ ```text
41
+ https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal
42
+ ```
43
+
44
+ ## Describe Your Role
45
+
46
+ ```text
47
+ Primary maintainer
48
+ ```
49
+
50
+ ## Why This Repository Qualifies
51
+
52
+ ```text
53
+ oss-signal is a public OSS maintainer tool for reducing triage and review load. It ships as npm package oss-signal@0.5.1 and GitHub Action SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1, supports Markdown/JSON/SARIF/Issue output, passes CI/CodeQL, and has public field-audit issues/PRs plus a separate workflow demo.
54
+ ```
55
+
56
+ ## Interest
57
+
58
+ ```text
59
+ Codex Security
60
+ API credits for my project
61
+ ```
62
+
63
+ ## OpenAI Organization ID
64
+
65
+ ```text
66
+ Fill manually from https://platform.openai.com/settings/organization/general
67
+ ```
68
+
69
+ ## API Credit Use
70
+
71
+ ```text
72
+ Use Codex/API credits to run repeatable public repository audits, draft focused maintainer PRs and issue summaries from reports, build organization-level maintainer-readiness inventories, improve release/Code Scanning automation, and keep every public follow-up behind human review before posting or opening PRs.
73
+ ```
74
+
75
+ ## Anything Else
76
+
77
+ ```text
78
+ The project is early, so I am not overstating adoption. Current evidence includes npm 0.5.1, a published v0.5.1 release, a reusable GitHub Action, self-audit score 100/100, public CodeQL/CI, public field-audit PRs, and a separate public workflow run using SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.4.0 with a report artifact.
79
+ ```
80
+
81
+ ## Evidence Links
82
+
83
+ - npm package: https://www.npmjs.com/package/oss-signal
84
+ - GitHub Release v0.5.1: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/releases/tag/v0.5.1
85
+ - Main repository health workflow: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/actions/workflows/repository-health.yml
86
+ - Separate workflow demo repository: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo
87
+ - Separate successful workflow run: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal-adoption-demo/actions/runs/26862361229
88
+ - Adoption evidence: https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal/blob/main/docs/adoption-evidence.md
89
+
90
+ ## Character Counts
91
+
92
+ - Why this repository qualifies: 299/500
93
+ - API credit use: 312/500
94
+ - Anything else: 309/500
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ jobs:
10
10
  runs-on: ubuntu-latest
11
11
  steps:
12
12
  - uses: actions/checkout@v4
13
- - uses: SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.3.0
13
+ - uses: SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1
14
14
  id: oss-signal
15
15
  with:
16
16
  fail-under: "80"
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
1
+ name: Repository health
2
+
3
+ on:
4
+ pull_request:
5
+ push:
6
+ branches: [main]
7
+ workflow_dispatch:
8
+
9
+ permissions:
10
+ contents: read
11
+ security-events: write
12
+
13
+ jobs:
14
+ oss-signal:
15
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
16
+ steps:
17
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
18
+ - uses: SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1
19
+ id: oss-signal
20
+ with:
21
+ fail-under: "80"
22
+ output: oss-signal-report.md
23
+ summary: "true"
24
+ - uses: SalmonPlays/oss-signal@v0.5.1
25
+ with:
26
+ format: sarif
27
+ output: oss-signal.sarif
28
+ summary: "false"
29
+ - uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
30
+ if: github.event_name != 'pull_request'
31
+ with:
32
+ sarif_file: oss-signal.sarif
33
+ - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
34
+ with:
35
+ name: oss-signal-report
36
+ path: |
37
+ oss-signal-report.md
38
+ oss-signal.sarif
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
1
+ # Maintainer Readiness Follow-Up
2
+
3
+ oss-signal scored this repository **64/100 (D)**.
4
+
5
+ Source: GitHub (platformatic/massimo@main)
6
+ Generated: 2026-06-03T05:12:35.488Z
7
+
8
+ ## Scope
9
+
10
+ This issue is limited to maintainer-readiness signals: documentation, contribution paths, CI, security reporting, and package hygiene. It does not claim there is a product-code bug.
11
+
12
+ ## Suggested Next Steps
13
+
14
+ - [ ] **Security policy** (9 pts): Add SECURITY.md with supported versions, reporting instructions, and response expectations.
15
+ - [ ] **Changelog** (6 pts): Keep CHANGELOG.md with dated release entries and migration notes.
16
+ - [ ] **Issue templates** (5 pts): Add bug report and feature request templates under .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/.
17
+ - [ ] **Pull request template** (5 pts): Add .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md with a short checklist.
18
+ - [ ] **Dependency update automation** (5 pts): Add .github/dependabot.yml for the package ecosystems used in the repository.
19
+ - [ ] **Support policy** (4 pts): Add SUPPORT.md describing where to ask questions, what is in scope, and expected response times.
20
+ - [ ] **Static security analysis** (4 pts): Add a CodeQL or equivalent security scanning workflow.
21
+
22
+ ## Why These Checks Matter
23
+
24
+ - **Security policy**: Responsible disclosure needs a private, documented path.
25
+ - **Changelog**: Users need a durable place to understand release impact.
26
+ - **Issue templates**: Issue templates collect the facts maintainers need to reproduce and triage.
27
+ - **Pull request template**: PR templates nudge contributors to include tests, docs, and review context.
28
+ - **Dependency update automation**: Automated dependency updates reduce security and compatibility drift.
29
+ - **Support policy**: Support boundaries help maintainers avoid turning every request into unpaid consulting.
30
+ - **Static security analysis**: Static analysis finds common vulnerability patterns before releases.
31
+
32
+ ## Notes For Maintainers
33
+
34
+ If any item is intentionally absent, documenting that decision is a valid outcome. Please close or edit this issue if it does not match the project's priorities.
35
+
36
+ _Generated by oss-signal; review before posting._
37
+
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2
2
 
3
3
  Repository: `https://github.com/SalmonPlays/oss-signal`
4
4
  Source: GitHub (SalmonPlays/oss-signal@main)
5
- Generated: 2026-06-02T08:09:34.957Z
5
+ Generated: 2026-06-03T05:12:35.946Z
6
6
 
7
7
  Score: **100/100** (A)
8
8