openplanr 3.4.0 → 3.6.0

package/lib/host-packages/cursor/openplanr/runtime/operate/scripts/operate-review-contract.mjs

@@ -1,428 +0,0 @@
-const deepFreeze = (value) => {
-  if (value && typeof value === 'object' && !Object.isFrozen(value)) {
-    for (const child of Object.values(value)) deepFreeze(child);
-    Object.freeze(value);
-  }
-  return value;
-};
-
-/**
- * Historical Operate Markdown contract.
- *
- * This remains available only so notes written by released 1.x guidance can be
- * identified and read. Canonical skills must use the current v2 contract below.
- */
-export const OPERATE_REVIEW_NOTE_PROFILES_V1 = deepFreeze({
-  advisor: {
-    maxBytes: 16 * 1024,
-    sections: [
-      'Findings',
-      'Recommended next move',
-      'Decision-changing gaps',
-      'Evidence index',
-      'Review coverage',
-      'Audit note',
-    ],
-    summaryFields: ['Signal', 'Bottom line'],
-    summaryValues: {
-      Signal: ['action', 'watch', 'insufficient evidence'],
-    },
-    item: {
-      section: 'Findings',
-      idPrefix: 'F',
-      maxItems: 5,
-      emptyText: 'No decision-relevant finding was established.',
-      fields: [
-        'Priority',
-        'Status',
-        'Why it matters',
-        'Evidence',
-        'Confidence',
-        'Decision implication',
-      ],
-      fieldValues: {
-        Priority: ['P0', 'P1', 'P2', 'unranked'],
-        Status: ['observed', 'inferred'],
-      },
-    },
-    sectionFields: {
-      'Recommended next move': [
-        'Recommendation',
-        'Proposed owner',
-        'First step',
-        'Expected result',
-        'Verification',
-        'Reversible / revisit when',
-        'Evidence',
-      ],
-      'Review coverage': ['Questions answered', 'Questions not established', 'Evidence boundary'],
-    },
-    sectionEmptyStates: {
-      'Recommended next move': 'No recommendation from current evidence.',
-    },
-    sectionItemLimits: {
-      'Decision-changing gaps': 3,
-    },
-  },
-  challenger: {
-    maxBytes: 12 * 1024,
-    sections: [
-      'Material exceptions',
-      'Decisions that still hold',
-      'Material dissent',
-      'Decision-changing gaps',
-      'Audit note',
-    ],
-    summaryFields: ['Verdict', 'Bottom line'],
-    summaryValues: {
-      Verdict: ['holds', 'holds with exceptions', 'not decision-ready'],
-    },
-    item: {
-      section: 'Material exceptions',
-      idPrefix: 'X',
-      maxItems: 5,
-      emptyText: 'No material exception found.',
-      fields: ['Target', 'Type', 'Decision impact', 'Challenge', 'Evidence', 'Resolution'],
-      fieldValues: {
-        Type: [
-          'unsupported',
-          'contradicted',
-          'correlated reasoning',
-          'missing alternative',
-          'unpriced downside',
-          'overconfident',
-        ],
-      },
-    },
-    sectionFields: {
-      'Material dissent': ['Dissent', 'Resolution condition'],
-    },
-    sectionItemLimits: {
-      'Decision-changing gaps': 3,
-    },
-  },
-  chair: {
-    maxBytes: 24 * 1024,
-    sections: [
-      'Decision queue',
-      'Action plan',
-      'Material risks and dissent',
-      'Decision-changing gaps',
-      'Review trail',
-      'Evidence index',
-      'Human gate',
-    ],
-    summaryFields: ['Overall signal', 'Executive call'],
-    summaryValues: {
-      'Overall signal': ['act now', 'decide next', 'watch', 'insufficient evidence'],
-    },
-    item: {
-      section: 'Decision queue',
-      idPrefix: 'D',
-      maxItems: 5,
-      emptyText: 'No decision-ready proposal was established.',
-      headingSuffixPattern: /^\[(?:P0|P1|P2|unranked)\]\s+\S/u,
-      fields: [
-        'Recommendation',
-        'Why now',
-        'Owner',
-        'Confidence',
-        'Alternative',
-        'First step',
-        'Expected result',
-        'Verification',
-        'Dependencies',
-        'Reversible / revisit when',
-        'Evidence',
-        'Dissent',
-      ],
-    },
-    sectionFields: {},
-    sectionItemLimits: {
-      'Decision-changing gaps': 5,
-    },
-  },
-  'board-report': {
-    maxBytes: 24 * 1024,
-    sections: [
-      'Scope and custody',
-      'Executive call',
-      'Decision queue',
-      'Action plan',
-      'Material risks and dissent',
-      'Decision-changing gaps',
-      'Review trail',
-      'Human gate',
-    ],
-    summaryFields: [],
-    item: {
-      section: 'Decision queue',
-      idPrefix: 'D',
-      maxItems: 5,
-      emptyText: 'No decision-ready proposal was established.',
-      headingSuffixPattern: /^\[(?:P0|P1|P2|unranked)\]\s+\S/u,
-      fields: [
-        'Recommendation',
-        'Why now',
-        'Owner',
-        'Confidence',
-        'Alternative',
-        'First step',
-        'Expected result',
-        'Verification',
-        'Dependencies',
-        'Reversible / revisit when',
-        'Evidence',
-        'Dissent',
-      ],
-    },
-    sectionFields: {
-      'Scope and custody': [
-        'Subject',
-        'Evidence window',
-        'Pending decision',
-        'Cycle owner',
-        'Custody',
-      ],
-    },
-    sectionItemLimits: {
-      'Decision-changing gaps': 5,
-    },
-  },
-});
-
-export const OPERATE_REVIEW_NOTE_PROFILES = deepFreeze({
-  advisor: {
-    maxBytes: 16 * 1024,
-    sections: ['Findings', 'Recommended next move', 'Decision-changing gaps', 'Sources consulted'],
-    summaryFields: ['Signal', 'Bottom line'],
-    summaryValues: {
-      Signal: ['action', 'watch', 'insufficient context'],
-    },
-    item: {
-      section: 'Findings',
-      idPrefix: 'F',
-      maxItems: 5,
-      emptyText: 'No decision-relevant finding was established.',
-      fields: ['Priority', 'Status', 'Why it matters', 'Sources', 'Confidence', 'Decision impact'],
-      fieldValues: {
-        Priority: ['P0', 'P1', 'P2', 'unranked'],
-        Status: ['observed', 'inferred'],
-      },
-    },
-    sectionFields: {
-      'Recommended next move': [
-        'Recommendation',
-        'Suggested owner',
-        'First step',
-        'Expected result',
-        'Check',
-        'Revisit when',
-      ],
-    },
-    sectionEmptyStates: {
-      'Recommended next move': 'No recommendation from current context.',
-    },
-    sectionItemLimits: {
-      'Decision-changing gaps': 3,
-    },
-  },
-  challenger: {
-    maxBytes: 12 * 1024,
-    sections: [
-      'Material exceptions',
-      'Decisions that still hold',
-      'Risks and dissent',
-      'Decision-changing gaps',
-    ],
-    summaryFields: ['Verdict', 'Bottom line'],
-    summaryValues: {
-      Verdict: ['holds', 'holds with exceptions', 'not decision-ready'],
-    },
-    item: {
-      section: 'Material exceptions',
-      idPrefix: 'X',
-      maxItems: 5,
-      emptyText: 'No material exception found.',
-      fields: ['Target', 'Type', 'Decision impact', 'Challenge', 'Sources', 'Resolution'],
-      fieldValues: {
-        Type: [
-          'unsupported',
-          'contradicted',
-          'correlated reasoning',
-          'missing alternative',
-          'unpriced downside',
-          'overconfident',
-        ],
-      },
-    },
-    sectionFields: {
-      'Risks and dissent': ['Dissent', 'Resolution condition'],
-    },
-    sectionItemLimits: {
-      'Decision-changing gaps': 3,
-    },
-  },
-  chair: {
-    maxBytes: 24 * 1024,
-    sections: [
-      'Decision queue',
-      'Action plan',
-      'Risks and dissent',
-      'Decision-changing gaps',
-      'Review coverage',
-    ],
-    summaryFields: ['Overall signal', 'Executive call'],
-    summaryValues: {
-      'Overall signal': ['act now', 'decide next', 'watch', 'insufficient context'],
-    },
-    item: {
-      section: 'Decision queue',
-      idPrefix: 'D',
-      maxItems: 5,
-      emptyText: 'No decision-ready proposal was established.',
-      headingSuffixPattern: /^\[(?:P0|P1|P2|unranked)\]\s+\S/u,
-      fields: [
-        'Recommendation',
-        'Why now',
-        'Suggested owner',
-        'Confidence',
-        'Alternative',
-        'First step',
-        'Expected result',
-        'Check',
-        'Dependencies',
-        'Revisit when',
-        'Sources',
-        'Dissent',
-      ],
-    },
-    sectionFields: {},
-    sectionItemLimits: {
-      'Decision-changing gaps': 5,
-    },
-  },
-  'board-report': {
-    maxBytes: 24 * 1024,
-    sections: [
-      'Scope',
-      'Executive summary',
-      'Decision queue',
-      'Action plan',
-      'Risks and dissent',
-      'Decision-changing gaps',
-      'Review coverage',
-      'Issues',
-    ],
-    summaryFields: [],
-    item: {
-      section: 'Decision queue',
-      idPrefix: 'D',
-      maxItems: 5,
-      emptyText: 'No decision-ready proposal was established.',
-      headingSuffixPattern: /^\[(?:P0|P1|P2|unranked)\]\s+\S/u,
-      fields: [
-        'Recommendation',
-        'Why now',
-        'Suggested owner',
-        'Confidence',
-        'Alternative',
-        'First step',
-        'Expected result',
-        'Check',
-        'Dependencies',
-        'Revisit when',
-        'Sources',
-        'Dissent',
-      ],
-    },
-    sectionFields: {
-      Scope: ['Subject', 'Window', 'Requested decision', 'Custody'],
-    },
-    sectionItemLimits: {
-      'Decision-changing gaps': 5,
-    },
-  },
-});
-
-export const OPERATE_REVIEW_NOTE_PROFILES_V2 = OPERATE_REVIEW_NOTE_PROFILES;
-export const OPERATE_REVIEW_CONTRACT_VERSION = '2.0.0';
-export const OPERATE_REVIEW_CONTRACT_VERSIONS = Object.freeze(['1.0.0', '2.0.0']);
-
-/**
- * Additive human-note rubric overlay for Operate's five executive advisors.
- *
- * The closed Operate 2.0 machine registry remains the runtime contract. These
- * questions govern concise Markdown projections produced by canonical skills.
- */
-export const OPERATE_ADVISOR_REVIEW_RUBRICS = deepFreeze({
-  'strategy-finance': {
-    skillId: 'planr-ceo-review',
-    requiredQuestions: [
-      'What current evidence changes or constrains company direction?',
-      'Which objectives appear mis-resourced relative to evidenced expected value?',
-      'What runway, margin, or cost consequence is established, and what remains unknown?',
-      'Which decisions carry an evidenced cost of delay, and which remain unranked?',
-    ],
-  },
-  'technology-risk': {
-    skillId: 'planr-cto-review',
-    requiredQuestions: [
-      'Which technical constraints now block a stated objective?',
-      'Which technical risks are decision-relevant, and which remain unranked?',
-      'Which architectural decision, if any, is being made implicitly by in-flight work?',
-      'How reversible are the evidenced high-impact changes?',
-    ],
-  },
-  'product-activation': {
-    skillId: 'planr-cpo-review',
-    requiredQuestions: [
-      'Where does current evidence show users failing to reach value?',
-      'Which product bets remain unvalidated, and what bounded next test is supported?',
-      'Is committed scope ordered by evidenced value and risk?',
-      'Which committed scope, if any, should be cut to protect the activation path?',
-      'Are acceptance criteria testable and tied to a customer or product outcome?',
-    ],
-  },
-  'growth-market': {
-    skillId: 'planr-cmo-review',
-    requiredQuestions: [
-      'What current evidence changes or constrains demand and positioning?',
-      'Which acquisition-channel evidence is strong, weak, or absent?',
-      'Which explicit market or positioning claim, if any, is unsupported?',
-      'Which growth loop is evidenced as repeatable rather than merely proposed?',
-    ],
-  },
-  'operations-customer': {
-    skillId: 'planr-coo-review',
-    requiredQuestions: [
-      'Can the organization deliver current commitments at evidenced capacity?',
-      'Where, if anywhere, is customer health degrading, and what operational cause is evidenced?',
-      'Which process, if any, is a single point of failure or single-person dependency?',
-      'Which operational commitment, if any, should be renegotiated before it is missed?',
-    ],
-  },
-});
-
-export const OPERATE_REVIEW_CONTRACT_V1 = deepFreeze({
-  kind: 'operate-human-review-contract',
-  schemaVersion: '1.0.0',
-  protocolBaseline: { id: 'operate', version: '2.0.0' },
-  profiles: OPERATE_REVIEW_NOTE_PROFILES_V1,
-  advisorRubrics: OPERATE_ADVISOR_REVIEW_RUBRICS,
-});
-
-export const OPERATE_REVIEW_CONTRACT_V2 = deepFreeze({
-  kind: 'operate-review-quality-contract',
-  schemaVersion: '2.0.0',
-  protocolBaseline: { id: 'operate', version: '2.0.0' },
-  profiles: OPERATE_REVIEW_NOTE_PROFILES,
-  advisorRubrics: OPERATE_ADVISOR_REVIEW_RUBRICS,
-});
-
-export const OPERATE_REVIEW_CONTRACTS = deepFreeze({
-  '1.0.0': OPERATE_REVIEW_CONTRACT_V1,
-  '2.0.0': OPERATE_REVIEW_CONTRACT_V2,
-});
-
-export const OPERATE_REVIEW_CONTRACT = OPERATE_REVIEW_CONTRACT_V2;