opencodekit 0.17.1 → 0.17.3
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/index.js +1 -1
- package/dist/template/.opencode/AGENT_ALIGNMENT.md +564 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/agent/build.md +140 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/agent/general.md +89 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/agent/plan.md +175 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/agent/review.md +96 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/command/create.md +57 -15
- package/dist/template/.opencode/command/init-context.md +259 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/command/init-user.md +103 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/command/init.md +53 -39
- package/dist/template/.opencode/command/plan.md +200 -16
- package/dist/template/.opencode/command/ship.md +251 -17
- package/dist/template/.opencode/command/start.md +35 -4
- package/dist/template/.opencode/memory/_templates/PROJECT.md +58 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/memory/_templates/ROADMAP.md +93 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/memory/_templates/STATE.md +89 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/memory/_templates/tech-stack.md +35 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/memory/project/project.md +92 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/memory/project/roadmap.md +142 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/memory/project/state.md +84 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/opencode.json +28 -1
- package/dist/template/.opencode/package.json +1 -1
- package/dist/template/.opencode/skill/context-initialization/SKILL.md +60 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/skill/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md +76 -0
- package/dist/template/.opencode/skill/writing-plans/SKILL.md +68 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
package/dist/index.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ var cac = (name = "") => new CAC(name);
|
|
|
759
759
|
// package.json
|
|
760
760
|
var package_default = {
|
|
761
761
|
name: "opencodekit",
|
|
762
|
-
version: "0.17.
|
|
762
|
+
version: "0.17.3",
|
|
763
763
|
description: "CLI tool for bootstrapping and managing OpenCodeKit projects",
|
|
764
764
|
keywords: ["agents", "cli", "mcp", "opencode", "opencodekit", "template"],
|
|
765
765
|
license: "MIT",
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,564 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# GSD ↔ OpenCodeKit Agent Alignment
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Executive Summary
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
GSD has **11 specialized agents** (~12,000 total lines) vs OpenCodeKit's **8 general agents** (~1,200 total lines). GSD's depth enables rigorous execution; OpenCodeKit's simplicity enables faster adoption. This document maps them and proposes a hybrid architecture.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Agent Mapping Matrix
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
| GSD Agent | Lines | Role | OpenCodeKit Equivalent | Gap Analysis |
|
|
12
|
+
| -------------------------- | ----- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
13
|
+
| `gsd-planner` | 1,158 | Creates executable phase plans with goal-backward methodology, dependency graphs, wave assignment | `plan` (225 lines) | **5x depth gap**: GSD has TDD detection, discovery levels, scope estimation, gap closure mode, revision mode |
|
|
14
|
+
| `gsd-executor` | 404 | Executes plans atomically with deviation rules, checkpoint protocol, TDD cycles | `build` (191 lines) | **2x depth gap**: GSD has 4 deviation rules, auth gates, task commit protocol, self-check |
|
|
15
|
+
| `gsd-verifier` | 524 | Goal-backward verification (not task completion) with 3-level artifact checks | `review` (104 lines) + `verification-before-completion` skill | **Verifies goals vs code**: GSD checks if phase goal achieved, not just if tasks ran |
|
|
16
|
+
| `gsd-debugger` | 1,199 | Systematic debugging with scientific method, hypothesis testing, debug file protocol | `systematic-debugging` + `root-cause-tracing` skills | **Structured process**: GSD has debug file protocol, evidence tracking, elimination lists |
|
|
17
|
+
| `gsd-phase-researcher` | ~300 | Domain research for specific phases | `scout` (91 lines) | Similar scope, GSD has more structured output |
|
|
18
|
+
| `gsd-research-synthesizer` | ~200 | Aggregates parallel research findings | _No equivalent_ | **Missing**: Multi-agent research aggregation |
|
|
19
|
+
| `gsd-plan-checker` | ~400 | Validates plans against requirements before execution | _No equivalent_ | **Missing**: Pre-execution plan validation |
|
|
20
|
+
| `gsd-roadmapper` | ~300 | Creates ROADMAP.md with phase structure | _No equivalent_ | **Missing**: Dedicated roadmap creation |
|
|
21
|
+
| `gsd-codebase-mapper` | ~500 | Analyzes existing codebase architecture | `explore` (65 lines) | Deeper analysis: stack, conventions, concerns, architecture |
|
|
22
|
+
| `gsd-project-researcher` | ~250 | Project-level ecosystem research | `scout` | Overlaps with phase-researcher |
|
|
23
|
+
| `gsd-integration-checker` | ~200 | Validates integrations work correctly | _No equivalent_ | **Missing**: Integration validation agent |
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
---
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Detailed Alignment
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### 1. PLANNER ALIGNMENT
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
#### GSD gsd-planner (1,158 lines)
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
```yaml
|
|
34
|
+
Core Capabilities:
|
|
35
|
+
- Goal-backward methodology (truths → artifacts → wiring)
|
|
36
|
+
- Discovery levels (0-3) with mandatory protocol
|
|
37
|
+
- TDD detection heuristic
|
|
38
|
+
- Dependency graph construction (needs/creates/has_checkpoint)
|
|
39
|
+
- Wave assignment for parallel execution
|
|
40
|
+
- Scope estimation with context budget rules (~50% target)
|
|
41
|
+
- Gap closure mode (--gaps flag)
|
|
42
|
+
- Revision mode (checker feedback incorporation)
|
|
43
|
+
- Checkpoint protocol (3 types with structured returns)
|
|
44
|
+
- XML task format specification
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
Key Concepts:
|
|
47
|
+
- Plans ARE prompts (not documents that become prompts)
|
|
48
|
+
- Vertical slices preferred over horizontal layers
|
|
49
|
+
- 2-3 tasks per plan maximum
|
|
50
|
+
- Deviation rules (4 rules for auto-fixing)
|
|
51
|
+
```
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
#### OpenCodeKit plan (225 lines)
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```yaml
|
|
56
|
+
Core Capabilities:
|
|
57
|
+
- Architecture as ritual philosophy
|
|
58
|
+
- Five-phase ritual (Ground → Calibrate → Transform → Release → Reset)
|
|
59
|
+
- Memory ritual for planning context
|
|
60
|
+
- Delegation to @explore and @scout
|
|
61
|
+
- Basic plan artifact structure
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
Gaps vs GSD:
|
|
64
|
+
- No goal-backward methodology
|
|
65
|
+
- No discovery levels
|
|
66
|
+
- No TDD detection
|
|
67
|
+
- No dependency graphs or wave assignment
|
|
68
|
+
- No context budget awareness
|
|
69
|
+
- No checkpoint protocol
|
|
70
|
+
- No gap closure or revision modes
|
|
71
|
+
```
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
#### Recommended: Enhanced plan Agent
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
```markdown
|
|
76
|
+
## Enhancements to port from GSD:
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
1. **Add Goal-Backward Section**
|
|
79
|
+
- Derive observable truths from PRD goals
|
|
80
|
+
- Map truths → artifacts → wiring
|
|
81
|
+
- Document must_haves in plan frontmatter
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
2. **Add Discovery Levels**
|
|
84
|
+
- Level 0: Skip (existing patterns only)
|
|
85
|
+
- Level 1: Quick verification (2-5 min)
|
|
86
|
+
- Level 2: Standard research (15-30 min)
|
|
87
|
+
- Level 3: Deep dive (1+ hour)
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
3. **Add Dependency Graph Construction**
|
|
90
|
+
- For each task: record needs/creates/has_checkpoint
|
|
91
|
+
- Assign waves based on dependencies
|
|
92
|
+
- Identify parallelization opportunities
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
4. **Add Context Budget Rules**
|
|
95
|
+
- ~50% context target per plan
|
|
96
|
+
- 2-3 tasks maximum per plan
|
|
97
|
+
- Split signals (>5 files, >3 tasks)
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
5. **Add Checkpoint Protocol**
|
|
100
|
+
- checkpoint:human-verify (90% of cases)
|
|
101
|
+
- checkpoint:decision (9%)
|
|
102
|
+
- checkpoint:human-action (1%)
|
|
103
|
+
```
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
---
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
### 2. EXECUTOR ALIGNMENT
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
#### GSD gsd-executor (404 lines)
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
```yaml
|
|
112
|
+
Core Capabilities:
|
|
113
|
+
- Deviation rules (4 explicit rules)
|
|
114
|
+
- Authentication gates (auth errors as checkpoints)
|
|
115
|
+
- Checkpoint protocol with continuation handling
|
|
116
|
+
- TDD execution (RED → GREEN → REFACTOR)
|
|
117
|
+
- Task commit protocol (per-task commits)
|
|
118
|
+
- Summary creation with frontmatter
|
|
119
|
+
- Self-check before proceeding
|
|
120
|
+
- State updates via gsd-tools
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
Deviation Rules:
|
|
123
|
+
Rule 1: Auto-fix bugs (no permission needed)
|
|
124
|
+
Rule 2: Auto-add missing critical functionality
|
|
125
|
+
Rule 3: Auto-fix blocking issues
|
|
126
|
+
Rule 4: ASK about architectural changes
|
|
127
|
+
```
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
#### OpenCodeKit build (191 lines)
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
```yaml
|
|
132
|
+
Core Capabilities:
|
|
133
|
+
- Five-phase ritual (Ground → Calibrate → Transform → Release → Reset)
|
|
134
|
+
- Verification as calibration
|
|
135
|
+
- Memory ritual
|
|
136
|
+
- Delegation patterns
|
|
137
|
+
- Skills loading
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
Gaps vs GSD:
|
|
140
|
+
- No deviation rules
|
|
141
|
+
- No checkpoint protocol
|
|
142
|
+
- No TDD execution flow
|
|
143
|
+
- No per-task commit protocol
|
|
144
|
+
- No self-check requirement
|
|
145
|
+
```
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
#### Recommended: Enhanced build Agent
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
```markdown
|
|
150
|
+
## Enhancements to port from GSD:
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
1. **Add Deviation Rules Section**
|
|
153
|
+
- Rule 1: Auto-fix bugs (broken behavior, errors)
|
|
154
|
+
- Rule 2: Auto-add missing critical functionality (validation, auth, error handling)
|
|
155
|
+
- Rule 3: Auto-fix blocking issues (missing deps, wrong types)
|
|
156
|
+
- Rule 4: ASK about architectural changes (new tables, library switches)
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
2. **Add Checkpoint Protocol**
|
|
159
|
+
- Stop at checkpoint:\* tasks
|
|
160
|
+
- Return structured checkpoint message
|
|
161
|
+
- Support continuation agents
|
|
162
|
+
|
|
163
|
+
3. **Add TDD Execution Flow**
|
|
164
|
+
- RED: Create failing test → commit
|
|
165
|
+
- GREEN: Minimal code to pass → commit
|
|
166
|
+
- REFACTOR: Clean up → commit if changes
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
4. **Add Task Commit Protocol**
|
|
169
|
+
- Check modified files: git status --short
|
|
170
|
+
- Stage individually (NEVER git add .)
|
|
171
|
+
- Commit format: type(phase-plan): description
|
|
172
|
+
- Record hash for summary
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
5. **Add Self-Check Requirement**
|
|
175
|
+
- Verify created files exist
|
|
176
|
+
- Verify commits exist
|
|
177
|
+
- Append result to summary
|
|
178
|
+
```
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
---
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
### 3. VERIFIER ALIGNMENT
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
#### GSD gsd-verifier (524 lines)
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
```yaml
|
|
187
|
+
Core Philosophy:
|
|
188
|
+
- Task completion ≠ Goal achievement
|
|
189
|
+
- Goal-backward verification (not task-forward)
|
|
190
|
+
- Do NOT trust SUMMARY.md claims
|
|
191
|
+
- Verify what ACTUALLY exists in code
|
|
192
|
+
|
|
193
|
+
Three-Level Verification:
|
|
194
|
+
Level 1: Exists (file present)
|
|
195
|
+
Level 2: Substantive (not a stub)
|
|
196
|
+
Level 3: Wired (connected/used)
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
Artifact Verification:
|
|
199
|
+
- Use gsd-tools for automated checks
|
|
200
|
+
- Map to must_haves from PLAN frontmatter
|
|
201
|
+
- Status: VERIFIED | STUB | MISSING | ORPHANED
|
|
202
|
+
|
|
203
|
+
Key Link Verification:
|
|
204
|
+
- Component → API (fetch + response handling)
|
|
205
|
+
- API → Database (query + result returned)
|
|
206
|
+
- Form → Handler (handler + API call)
|
|
207
|
+
- State → Render (state displayed)
|
|
208
|
+
```
|
|
209
|
+
|
|
210
|
+
#### OpenCodeKit review (104 lines)
|
|
211
|
+
|
|
212
|
+
```yaml
|
|
213
|
+
Core Philosophy:
|
|
214
|
+
- Read-only review agent
|
|
215
|
+
- Quality guardian mindset
|
|
216
|
+
- Severity-ranked findings (P0-P3)
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
Triage Criteria:
|
|
219
|
+
- Affects correctness, performance, security
|
|
220
|
+
- Introduced or worsened by change
|
|
221
|
+
- Fixable without unrealistic rigor
|
|
222
|
+
- Author would actually want to fix
|
|
223
|
+
|
|
224
|
+
Gaps vs GSD:
|
|
225
|
+
- Reviews code changes, not goal achievement
|
|
226
|
+
- No three-level artifact verification
|
|
227
|
+
- No key link verification
|
|
228
|
+
- No stub detection patterns
|
|
229
|
+
```
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
#### Recommended: New verify Agent OR Enhanced review
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
````markdown
|
|
234
|
+
## Option A: New verify Agent (recommended)
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
Create `.opencode/agent/verify.md` as goal-backward verifier:
|
|
237
|
+
|
|
238
|
+
```yaml
|
|
239
|
+
---
|
|
240
|
+
description: Goal-backward verification agent - checks if goals are achieved, not just tasks completed
|
|
241
|
+
mode: subagent
|
|
242
|
+
---
|
|
243
|
+
Core Responsibilities: 1. Load PRD success criteria
|
|
244
|
+
2. Derive observable truths
|
|
245
|
+
3. Verify artifacts exist and are substantive
|
|
246
|
+
4. Verify key links are wired
|
|
247
|
+
5. Detect stubs and anti-patterns
|
|
248
|
+
6. Report gaps in structured format
|
|
249
|
+
```
|
|
250
|
+
````
|
|
251
|
+
|
|
252
|
+
## Option B: Enhanced review Agent
|
|
253
|
+
|
|
254
|
+
Add section to existing review.md:
|
|
255
|
+
|
|
256
|
+
- Goal-backward verification mode
|
|
257
|
+
- Three-level artifact checking
|
|
258
|
+
- Stub detection patterns
|
|
259
|
+
- Key link verification
|
|
260
|
+
|
|
261
|
+
````
|
|
262
|
+
|
|
263
|
+
---
|
|
264
|
+
|
|
265
|
+
### 4. DEBUGGER ALIGNMENT
|
|
266
|
+
|
|
267
|
+
#### GSD gsd-debugger (1,199 lines)
|
|
268
|
+
```yaml
|
|
269
|
+
Core Philosophy:
|
|
270
|
+
- User = Reporter, Claude = Investigator
|
|
271
|
+
- Meta-debugging: fighting your own mental model
|
|
272
|
+
- Scientific method: falsifiable hypotheses
|
|
273
|
+
- Foundation principles: observable facts only
|
|
274
|
+
|
|
275
|
+
Cognitive Biases to Avoid:
|
|
276
|
+
- Confirmation bias
|
|
277
|
+
- Anchoring
|
|
278
|
+
- Availability bias
|
|
279
|
+
- Sunk cost fallacy
|
|
280
|
+
|
|
281
|
+
Investigation Techniques:
|
|
282
|
+
- Binary search / divide and conquer
|
|
283
|
+
- Rubber duck debugging
|
|
284
|
+
- Minimal reproduction
|
|
285
|
+
- Working backwards
|
|
286
|
+
- Differential debugging
|
|
287
|
+
- Observability first
|
|
288
|
+
- Comment out everything
|
|
289
|
+
- Git bisect
|
|
290
|
+
|
|
291
|
+
Debug File Protocol:
|
|
292
|
+
Location: .planning/debug/{slug}.md
|
|
293
|
+
Sections: Symptoms, Eliminated, Evidence, Resolution
|
|
294
|
+
Update rules: OVERWRITE vs APPEND
|
|
295
|
+
Status transitions: gathering → investigating → fixing → verifying → resolved
|
|
296
|
+
````
|
|
297
|
+
|
|
298
|
+
#### OpenCodeKit Skills
|
|
299
|
+
|
|
300
|
+
```yaml
|
|
301
|
+
Existing:
|
|
302
|
+
- systematic-debugging skill
|
|
303
|
+
- root-cause-tracing skill
|
|
304
|
+
|
|
305
|
+
Gaps vs GSD:
|
|
306
|
+
- No debug file protocol
|
|
307
|
+
- No persistent debug state
|
|
308
|
+
- No cognitive bias awareness
|
|
309
|
+
- No investigation technique library
|
|
310
|
+
```
|
|
311
|
+
|
|
312
|
+
#### Recommended: Port to New Skill
|
|
313
|
+
|
|
314
|
+
```markdown
|
|
315
|
+
## Create `.opencode/skill/gsd-debugging/SKILL.md`
|
|
316
|
+
|
|
317
|
+
Port GSD debugger content as skill:
|
|
318
|
+
|
|
319
|
+
- Scientific method framework
|
|
320
|
+
- Hypothesis testing protocol
|
|
321
|
+
- Investigation techniques (8 methods)
|
|
322
|
+
- Debug file protocol
|
|
323
|
+
- Verification patterns
|
|
324
|
+
- Research vs reasoning decision tree
|
|
325
|
+
```
|
|
326
|
+
|
|
327
|
+
---
|
|
328
|
+
|
|
329
|
+
### 5. RESEARCH AGENTS ALIGNMENT
|
|
330
|
+
|
|
331
|
+
#### GSD Research Agents
|
|
332
|
+
|
|
333
|
+
```yaml
|
|
334
|
+
gsd-phase-researcher:
|
|
335
|
+
- Domain research for specific phases
|
|
336
|
+
- Stack investigation
|
|
337
|
+
- Architecture patterns
|
|
338
|
+
- Pitfall identification
|
|
339
|
+
|
|
340
|
+
gsd-research-synthesizer:
|
|
341
|
+
- Aggregates parallel research findings
|
|
342
|
+
- Resolves conflicts
|
|
343
|
+
- Produces unified recommendations
|
|
344
|
+
|
|
345
|
+
gsd-project-researcher:
|
|
346
|
+
- Project-level ecosystem research
|
|
347
|
+
- Similar to phase-researcher but broader
|
|
348
|
+
```
|
|
349
|
+
|
|
350
|
+
#### OpenCodeKit Research Agents
|
|
351
|
+
|
|
352
|
+
```yaml
|
|
353
|
+
scout (91 lines):
|
|
354
|
+
- External research specialist
|
|
355
|
+
- Source quality hierarchy
|
|
356
|
+
- Concise recommendations
|
|
357
|
+
|
|
358
|
+
explore (65 lines):
|
|
359
|
+
- Read-only codebase cartographer
|
|
360
|
+
- LSP-based symbol lookup
|
|
361
|
+
- Usage pattern discovery
|
|
362
|
+
```
|
|
363
|
+
|
|
364
|
+
#### Gap: Research Synthesizer
|
|
365
|
+
|
|
366
|
+
```markdown
|
|
367
|
+
## Missing: gsd-research-synthesizer equivalent
|
|
368
|
+
|
|
369
|
+
When multiple scout/explore agents run in parallel,
|
|
370
|
+
there's no dedicated agent to:
|
|
371
|
+
|
|
372
|
+
- Aggregate findings
|
|
373
|
+
- Resolve conflicts
|
|
374
|
+
- Produce unified recommendations
|
|
375
|
+
|
|
376
|
+
Recommendation: Add synthesis responsibility to plan agent
|
|
377
|
+
or create dedicated research-lead agent.
|
|
378
|
+
```
|
|
379
|
+
|
|
380
|
+
---
|
|
381
|
+
|
|
382
|
+
### 6. SPECIALIZED GSD AGENTS (No OpenCodeKit Equivalent)
|
|
383
|
+
|
|
384
|
+
#### gsd-plan-checker (~400 lines)
|
|
385
|
+
|
|
386
|
+
```markdown
|
|
387
|
+
Validates plans against requirements before execution.
|
|
388
|
+
|
|
389
|
+
Dimensions Checked:
|
|
390
|
+
|
|
391
|
+
- requirement_coverage: All requirements have tasks
|
|
392
|
+
- task_completeness: All tasks have required elements
|
|
393
|
+
- dependency_correctness: Dependencies are valid
|
|
394
|
+
- key_links_planned: Critical connections planned
|
|
395
|
+
- scope_sanity: Plan is achievable
|
|
396
|
+
- must_haves_derivation: must_haves exist and are valid
|
|
397
|
+
|
|
398
|
+
Recommendation: Add as skill or plan agent mode
|
|
399
|
+
```
|
|
400
|
+
|
|
401
|
+
#### gsd-roadmapper (~300 lines)
|
|
402
|
+
|
|
403
|
+
```markdown
|
|
404
|
+
Creates ROADMAP.md with phase structure.
|
|
405
|
+
|
|
406
|
+
Outputs:
|
|
407
|
+
|
|
408
|
+
- PROJECT.md (vision)
|
|
409
|
+
- REQUIREMENTS.md (scoped v1/v2)
|
|
410
|
+
- ROADMAP.md (phases with goals)
|
|
411
|
+
- STATE.md (memory)
|
|
412
|
+
|
|
413
|
+
Recommendation: Add `/roadmap` command
|
|
414
|
+
```
|
|
415
|
+
|
|
416
|
+
#### gsd-codebase-mapper (~500 lines)
|
|
417
|
+
|
|
418
|
+
```markdown
|
|
419
|
+
Analyzes existing codebase before new work.
|
|
420
|
+
|
|
421
|
+
Produces:
|
|
422
|
+
|
|
423
|
+
- STACK.md (tech stack)
|
|
424
|
+
- ARCHITECTURE.md (patterns)
|
|
425
|
+
- CONVENTIONS.md (coding standards)
|
|
426
|
+
- CONCERNS.md (tech debt, issues)
|
|
427
|
+
- STRUCTURE.md (file organization)
|
|
428
|
+
- INTEGRATIONS.md (external deps)
|
|
429
|
+
- TESTING.md (test patterns)
|
|
430
|
+
|
|
431
|
+
Recommendation: Add `/map-codebase` command
|
|
432
|
+
```
|
|
433
|
+
|
|
434
|
+
#### gsd-integration-checker (~200 lines)
|
|
435
|
+
|
|
436
|
+
```markdown
|
|
437
|
+
Validates integrations work correctly.
|
|
438
|
+
|
|
439
|
+
Checks:
|
|
440
|
+
|
|
441
|
+
- API contracts
|
|
442
|
+
- Database connections
|
|
443
|
+
- External service health
|
|
444
|
+
- Webhook endpoints
|
|
445
|
+
- Auth flows
|
|
446
|
+
|
|
447
|
+
Recommendation: Add to verify agent or as skill
|
|
448
|
+
```
|
|
449
|
+
|
|
450
|
+
---
|
|
451
|
+
|
|
452
|
+
## Unified Agent Architecture Proposal
|
|
453
|
+
|
|
454
|
+
### Primary Agents (Keep Current Structure)
|
|
455
|
+
|
|
456
|
+
```yaml
|
|
457
|
+
build:
|
|
458
|
+
role: Primary execution coordinator
|
|
459
|
+
enhancements:
|
|
460
|
+
- Add deviation rules section
|
|
461
|
+
- Add checkpoint protocol
|
|
462
|
+
- Add TDD execution flow
|
|
463
|
+
- Add task commit protocol
|
|
464
|
+
|
|
465
|
+
plan:
|
|
466
|
+
role: Blueprint architect
|
|
467
|
+
enhancements:
|
|
468
|
+
- Add goal-backward methodology
|
|
469
|
+
- Add discovery levels
|
|
470
|
+
- Add dependency graph construction
|
|
471
|
+
- Add wave assignment
|
|
472
|
+
- Add context budget rules
|
|
473
|
+
|
|
474
|
+
explore:
|
|
475
|
+
role: Read-only codebase cartographer
|
|
476
|
+
current: Good alignment with gsd-codebase-mapper
|
|
477
|
+
|
|
478
|
+
review:
|
|
479
|
+
role: Code review specialist
|
|
480
|
+
enhancements:
|
|
481
|
+
- Add goal-backward verification mode
|
|
482
|
+
- OR create separate verify agent
|
|
483
|
+
|
|
484
|
+
scout:
|
|
485
|
+
role: External research specialist
|
|
486
|
+
current: Good alignment with gsd-phase-researcher
|
|
487
|
+
```
|
|
488
|
+
|
|
489
|
+
### New Agents to Create
|
|
490
|
+
|
|
491
|
+
```yaml
|
|
492
|
+
verify (NEW):
|
|
493
|
+
description: Goal-backward verification agent
|
|
494
|
+
purpose: Check if goals achieved, not just tasks completed
|
|
495
|
+
ported_from: gsd-verifier
|
|
496
|
+
|
|
497
|
+
research-lead (NEW - optional):
|
|
498
|
+
description: Research synthesis coordinator
|
|
499
|
+
purpose: Aggregate parallel research, resolve conflicts
|
|
500
|
+
ported_from: gsd-research-synthesizer
|
|
501
|
+
```
|
|
502
|
+
|
|
503
|
+
### New Commands to Create
|
|
504
|
+
|
|
505
|
+
```yaml
|
|
506
|
+
/map-codebase:
|
|
507
|
+
description: Analyze existing codebase
|
|
508
|
+
creates: STACK.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, CONVENTIONS.md, etc.
|
|
509
|
+
ported_from: gsd:map-codebase
|
|
510
|
+
|
|
511
|
+
/roadmap:
|
|
512
|
+
description: Create project roadmap
|
|
513
|
+
creates: PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, ROADMAP.md, STATE.md
|
|
514
|
+
ported_from: gsd:new-project (planning phase only)
|
|
515
|
+
|
|
516
|
+
/verify:
|
|
517
|
+
description: Verify goal achievement
|
|
518
|
+
purpose: Run verify agent against bead
|
|
519
|
+
ported_from: gsd:verify-work
|
|
520
|
+
```
|
|
521
|
+
|
|
522
|
+
### New Skills to Create
|
|
523
|
+
|
|
524
|
+
```yaml
|
|
525
|
+
gsd-planning:
|
|
526
|
+
description: GSD-style planning methodology
|
|
527
|
+
content: Goal-backward, discovery levels, dependency graphs, wave assignment
|
|
528
|
+
|
|
529
|
+
gsd-debugging:
|
|
530
|
+
description: Systematic debugging with scientific method
|
|
531
|
+
content: Hypothesis testing, investigation techniques, debug file protocol
|
|
532
|
+
|
|
533
|
+
gsd-execution:
|
|
534
|
+
description: GSD-style execution discipline
|
|
535
|
+
content: Deviation rules, checkpoint protocol, TDD cycles
|
|
536
|
+
```
|
|
537
|
+
|
|
538
|
+
---
|
|
539
|
+
|
|
540
|
+
## Implementation Priority
|
|
541
|
+
|
|
542
|
+
| Priority | Item | Effort | Impact |
|
|
543
|
+
| -------- | ---------------------------------- | ------ | ------ |
|
|
544
|
+
| P0 | Add deviation rules to build agent | 2h | High |
|
|
545
|
+
| P0 | Add goal-backward to plan agent | 4h | High |
|
|
546
|
+
| P1 | Create verify agent | 6h | High |
|
|
547
|
+
| P1 | Add checkpoint protocol to build | 3h | High |
|
|
548
|
+
| P2 | Create gsd-debugging skill | 4h | Medium |
|
|
549
|
+
| P2 | Create gsd-planning skill | 4h | Medium |
|
|
550
|
+
| P2 | Add /map-codebase command | 4h | Medium |
|
|
551
|
+
| P3 | Create research-lead agent | 3h | Low |
|
|
552
|
+
| P3 | Add /roadmap command | 3h | Low |
|
|
553
|
+
|
|
554
|
+
---
|
|
555
|
+
|
|
556
|
+
## Summary
|
|
557
|
+
|
|
558
|
+
**GSD's Strength:** Deep, rigorous methodology with explicit protocols for every phase.
|
|
559
|
+
|
|
560
|
+
**OpenCodeKit's Strength:** Clean architecture, Beads integration, skills system.
|
|
561
|
+
|
|
562
|
+
**The Opportunity:** Port GSD's execution discipline (deviation rules, goal-backward verification, checkpoint protocol) into OpenCodeKit's cleaner architecture. Don't adopt GSD's ceremony — adapt its rigor.
|
|
563
|
+
|
|
564
|
+
**Key Principle:** Plans ARE prompts. Don't create documents that become prompts — create the prompt directly. This is GSD's core insight that OpenCodeKit should adopt.
|