opencode-swarm 7.88.0 → 7.88.2

package/.opencode/skills/brainstorm/SKILL.md

@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ If `council.general.enabled` is true in the resolved opencode-swarm config AND a
 - Exit with a design outline the user can skim in under two minutes.
 
 **Phase 5: SPEC WRITE + SELF-REVIEW (architect + reviewer).**
-    - Generate `.swarm/spec.md` following the same SPEC CONTENT RULES that MODE: SPECIFY uses: WHAT/WHY only, no tech stack, no implementation details, FR-### / SC-### numbering, Given/When/Then scenarios, `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers only for items that survive the clarification funnel: inventory all material uncertainties without numeric cap → classify each (self_resolved/critic_resolved/research_needed/user_decision/deferred_nonblocking) — **overconfidence guard:** if the default is not directly supported by user request, spec, or recorded context, classify as `user_decision` rather than `self_resolved` → consult critic_sounding_board — critic responds per SoundingBoardVerdict: UNNECESSARY→DROP, RESOLVE→RESOLVE, REPHRASE→REPHRASE, APPROVED→ASK_USER — **always-surface protection:** always-surface categories must not receive UNNECESSARY/DROP; override to APPROVED/ASK_USER → record resolved items as assumptions → surface only survivors as markers with decision packet format (grouped by category, recommended defaults, blocking vs optional markers).
+    - Generate `.swarm/spec.md` following the same SPEC CONTENT RULES that MODE: SPECIFY uses: WHAT/WHY only, no tech stack, no implementation details, FR-### / SC-### numbering, Given/When/Then scenarios, `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers only for items that survive the clarification funnel: inventory all material uncertainties without numeric cap → classify each (self_resolved/critic_resolved/research_needed/user_decision/deferred_nonblocking) — **Overconfidence guard:** if the default is not directly supported by user request, spec, or recorded context, classify as `user_decision` rather than `self_resolved` → consult critic_sounding_board — critic responds per SoundingBoardVerdict: UNNECESSARY→DROP, RESOLVE→RESOLVE, REPHRASE→REPHRASE, APPROVED→ASK_USER — **always-surface protection:** always-surface categories must not receive UNNECESSARY/DROP; override to APPROVED/ASK_USER → record resolved items as assumptions → surface only survivors as markers with decision packet format (grouped by category, recommended defaults, blocking vs optional markers).
+    - **Important:** If research is ongoing, monitor the timeout configured in `.swarm/config.json` under `research_needed_timeout_ms` (default: 300000ms / 5 minutes). If research does not complete before the timeout expires, automatically reclassify the item to `user_decision` with a note that research was incomplete, then surface it to the user. This prevents the clarification funnel from stalling while waiting for external research.
 - Cross-reference design sections by name where relevant context helps (but keep HOW out of the spec).
 - Delegate to `the active swarm's reviewer agent` for an independent review of the draft spec. Reviewer must flag: requirements that encode HOW, untestable requirements, missing edge cases, silent assumptions.
 - Apply reviewer feedback. If reviewer rejects, iterate once and re-review. After two rounds, surface remaining disagreements to the user.

package/.opencode/skills/clarify/SKILL.md

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ There is NO hard cap on the internal inventory. Record every material uncertaint
 Classify each item as exactly one of:
 - `self_resolved`: answered from the user request, spec, plan, codebase reality check, `.swarm/context.md`, repo conventions, or an informed default. **If the default is not directly supported by user request, spec, or recorded context, classify as `user_decision` rather than `self_resolved`.**
 - `critic_resolved`: sent to Critic Sounding Board and resolved by the critic.
-- `research_needed`: needs SME/explorer/domain lookup before user escalation.
+- `research_needed`: needs SME/explorer/domain lookup before user escalation. **Important:** If research is ongoing, monitor the timeout configured in `.swarm/config.json` under `research_needed_timeout_ms` (default: 300000ms / 5 minutes). If research does not complete before the timeout expires, automatically reclassify the item to `user_decision` with a note that research was incomplete, then surface it to the user. This prevents the clarification funnel from stalling while waiting for external research.
 - `user_decision`: only the user can decide because it affects product scope, risk tolerance, policy, budget, UX, rollout, or destructive behavior.
 - `deferred_nonblocking`: useful follow-up detail that does not block a correct initial plan and can be explicitly recorded as an assumption or follow-up.
 
@@ -101,3 +101,9 @@ The critic may improve wording or confirm prior context, but these categories MU
 ### Assumptions Recording
 
 All items resolved in Stages 2-3 (self_resolved, critic_resolved, deferred_nonblocking) MUST be recorded as explicit assumptions in the spec, plan, or `.swarm/context.md`. Silently dropping resolved uncertainties is a protocol violation — every uncertainty that entered the funnel must have a recorded outcome.
+
+### Mechanical Enforcement of DROP Protection
+
+**Implementation Note:** The hard constraint against `DROP` on always-surface items (defined in Stage 3 of the clarification funnel) is currently enforced via skill instructions to the architect. A lightweight runtime enforcement mechanism is recommended: when processing the critic sounding board verdict response in `src/agents/critic.ts`, validate that any items tagged as "always-surface" do not receive `UNNECESSARY`/`DROP` verdicts. If a DROP verdict is encountered on an always-surface item, override it to `APPROVED`/`ASK_USER` at the code level rather than relying solely on prompt-based enforcement.
+
+This mechanical enforcement prevents the following failure mode: the architect prompt instructs the override, but due to parsing errors, context limits, or model behavior variance, the DROP verdict is mistakenly applied to an always-surface item and silently accepted. The validation should occur in the decision-packet assembly code (when building the final clarification packet to surface to the user) and should emit a warning log when an override is applied.

package/.opencode/skills/clarify-spec/SKILL.md

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ CLARIFY-SPEC handles **already-surfaced** `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers and sp
 However, before surfacing each marker question to the user, CLARIFY-SPEC MUST:
 
 1. **Consult `critic_sounding_board`** with the candidate marker question and surrounding spec context to check whether the question wording can be improved or the item can be resolved from existing context.
-2. **Apply the overconfidence guard:** If the critic supplies a `RESOLVE` verdict with a default answer, but that default is not directly supported by user request, spec, or recorded context, classify the item as `user_decision` rather than `self_resolved`.
+2. **Apply the Overconfidence guard:** If the critic supplies a `RESOLVE` verdict with a default answer, but that default is not directly supported by user request, spec, or recorded context, classify the item as `user_decision` rather than `self_resolved`.
 3. **Apply always-surface protection:** If the marker belongs to an always-surface category (scope boundaries, destructive behavior, security/privacy, backward compatibility, breaking API changes, new dependencies, deprecations, cross-platform impact, cost/performance tradeoffs, user-visible UX, rollout strategy, QA gates), the item MUST NOT receive `UNNECESSARY`/`DROP` from the critic — override to `APPROVED`/`ASK_USER`.
 
 Critic verdict mapping (see `src/agents/critic.ts` `SoundingBoardVerdict`): `UNNECESSARY`→DROP, `RESOLVE`→RESOLVE, `REPHRASE`→REPHRASE, `APPROVED`→ASK_USER.

package/.opencode/skills/issue-ingest/SKILL.md

@@ -45,8 +45,9 @@ Flags parsed from signal:
    - WHAT users need and WHY — never HOW to implement
    - FR-### / SC-### numbering, Given/When/Then scenarios
    - No technology stack, APIs, or code structure
-    - `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers only for items that survive the clarification funnel: inventory all material uncertainties without numeric cap → classify each (self_resolved/critic_resolved/research_needed/user_decision/deferred_nonblocking) — **overconfidence guard:** if the default is not directly supported by user request, spec, or recorded context, classify as `user_decision` rather than `self_resolved` → consult critic_sounding_board — critic responds per SoundingBoardVerdict: UNNECESSARY→DROP, RESOLVE→RESOLVE, REPHRASE→REPHRASE, APPROVED→ASK_USER — **always-surface protection:** always-surface categories must not receive UNNECESSARY/DROP; override to APPROVED/ASK_USER → record resolved items as assumptions → surface only survivors as markers with decision packet format (grouped by category, recommended defaults, blocking vs optional markers)
-2. Cross-reference the spec against the issue's expected behavior to ensure alignment.
+     - `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers only for items that survive the clarification funnel: inventory all material uncertainties without numeric cap → classify each (self_resolved/critic_resolved/research_needed/user_decision/deferred_nonblocking) — **Overconfidence guard:** if the default is not directly supported by user request, spec, or recorded context, classify as `user_decision` rather than `self_resolved` → consult critic_sounding_board — critic responds per SoundingBoardVerdict: UNNECESSARY→DROP, RESOLVE→RESOLVE, REPHRASE→REPHRASE, APPROVED→ASK_USER — **always-surface protection:** always-surface categories must not receive UNNECESSARY/DROP; override to APPROVED/ASK_USER → record resolved items as assumptions → surface only survivors as markers with decision packet format (grouped by category, recommended defaults, blocking vs optional markers)
+     - **Important:** If research is ongoing, monitor the timeout configured in `.swarm/config.json` under `research_needed_timeout_ms` (default: 300000ms / 5 minutes). If research does not complete before the timeout expires, automatically reclassify the item to `user_decision` with a note that research was incomplete, then surface it to the user. This prevents the clarification funnel from stalling while waiting for external research.
+ 2. Cross-reference the spec against the issue's expected behavior to ensure alignment.
 3. If the issue is a bug: spec must describe the correct behavior, not the broken behavior.
 4. If the issue is a feature: spec must describe the user-facing outcome, not the implementation.
 5. QA GATE SELECTION: Ask user which QA gates to enable (same dialogue as MODE: SPECIFY). Write to `.swarm/context.md` under `## Pending QA Gate Selection`.

package/.opencode/skills/plan/SKILL.md

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Classify each item as exactly one of:
 
 - `self_resolved`: answered from the user request, spec, plan, codebase reality check, `.swarm/context.md`, repo conventions, or an informed default. **If the default is not directly supported by user request, spec, or recorded context, classify as `user_decision` rather than `self_resolved`.**
 - `critic_resolved`: sent to Critic Sounding Board and resolved by the critic.
-- `research_needed`: needs SME/explorer/domain lookup before user escalation.
+- `research_needed`: needs SME/explorer/domain lookup before user escalation. **Important:** If research is ongoing, monitor the timeout configured in `.swarm/config.json` under `research_needed_timeout_ms` (default: 300000ms / 5 minutes). If research does not complete before the timeout expires, automatically reclassify the item to `user_decision` with a note that research was incomplete, then surface it to the user. This prevents the clarification funnel from stalling while waiting for external research.
 - `user_decision`: only the user can decide because it affects product scope, risk tolerance, policy, budget, UX, rollout, or destructive behavior.
 - `deferred_nonblocking`: useful follow-up detail that does not block a correct initial plan and can be explicitly recorded as an assumption or follow-up.
 
@@ -152,6 +152,12 @@ All items resolved in Stages 2-3 (self_resolved, critic_resolved, deferred_nonbl
 
 The plan generated by `save_plan` MUST include explicit assumptions and remaining unresolved decisions in the task descriptions or acceptance criteria — not silently omit them.
 
+#### Mechanical Enforcement of DROP Protection
+
+**Implementation Note:** The hard constraint against `DROP` on always-surface items (Stage 3 of the clarification funnel) is currently enforced via skill instructions to the architect. A lightweight runtime enforcement mechanism is recommended: when processing the critic sounding board verdict response in `src/agents/critic.ts`, validate that any items tagged as "always-surface" do not receive `UNNECESSARY`/`DROP` verdicts. If a DROP verdict is encountered on an always-surface item, override it to `APPROVED`/`ASK_USER` at the code level rather than relying solely on prompt-based enforcement.
+
+This mechanical enforcement prevents the following failure mode: the architect prompt instructs the override, but due to parsing errors, context limits, or model behavior variance, the DROP verdict is mistakenly applied to an always-surface item and silently accepted. The validation should occur in the decision-packet assembly code (when building the final clarification packet to surface to the user) and should emit a warning log when an override is applied.
+
 Use the `save_plan` tool to create the implementation plan. Required parameters:
 - `title`: The real project name from the spec (NOT a placeholder like [Project])
 - `swarm_id`: The swarm identifier (e.g. "mega", "local", "paid")

package/.opencode/skills/specify/SKILL.md

@@ -28,8 +28,9 @@ Activates when: user asks to "specify", "define requirements", "write a spec", o
    - Success criteria numbered SC-001, SC-002… — measurable and technology-agnostic
    - Key entities if data is involved (no schema or field definitions — entity names only)
    - Edge cases and known failure modes
-    - `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers for items where uncertainty could change scope, security, or core behavior, BUT ONLY after running the clarification funnel: (1) inventory all material uncertainties without numeric cap, (2) classify each as self_resolved/critic_resolved/research_needed/user_decision/deferred_nonblocking — **overconfidence guard:** if the default is not directly supported by user request, spec, or recorded context, classify as `user_decision` rather than `self_resolved`, (3) consult critic_sounding_board with candidate items — critic responds per SoundingBoardVerdict: UNNECESSARY→DROP, RESOLVE→RESOLVE, REPHRASE→REPHRASE, APPROVED→ASK_USER — **always-surface protection:** always-surface categories must not receive UNNECESSARY/DROP; override to APPROVED/ASK_USER, (4) record all resolved items as explicit assumptions in the spec, (5) use markers only for items that survive the funnel (ASK_USER or unresolved after critic consultation). Decision packet format: grouped by category, recommended defaults, blocking vs optional markers, impact of accepting default. Prefer informed defaults over asking
-5. Write the spec to `.swarm/spec.md`.
+    - `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers for items where uncertainty could change scope, security, or core behavior, BUT ONLY after running the clarification funnel: (1) inventory all material uncertainties without numeric cap, (2) classify each as self_resolved/critic_resolved/research_needed/user_decision/deferred_nonblocking — **Overconfidence guard:** if the default is not directly supported by user request, spec, or recorded context, classify as `user_decision` rather than `self_resolved`, (3) consult critic_sounding_board with candidate items — critic responds per SoundingBoardVerdict: UNNECESSARY→DROP, RESOLVE→RESOLVE, REPHRASE→REPHRASE, APPROVED→ASK_USER — **always-surface protection:** always-surface categories must not receive UNNECESSARY/DROP; override to APPROVED/ASK_USER, (4) record all resolved items as explicit assumptions in the spec, (5) use markers only for items that survive the funnel (ASK_USER or unresolved after critic consultation). Decision packet format: grouped by category, recommended defaults, blocking vs optional markers, impact of accepting default. Prefer informed defaults over asking
+     - **Important:** If research is ongoing, monitor the timeout configured in `.swarm/config.json` under `research_needed_timeout_ms` (default: 300000ms / 5 minutes). If research does not complete before the timeout expires, automatically reclassify the item to `user_decision` with a note that research was incomplete, then surface it to the user. This prevents the clarification funnel from stalling while waiting for external research.
+ 5. Write the spec to `.swarm/spec.md`.
 5b. **QA GATE SELECTION, PARALLEL CODERS, COMMIT FREQUENCY, AND AUTO_PROCEED (dialogue only).**
 Ask the user which QA gates to enable for this plan, how many parallel coders to use, the commit frequency, and auto_proceed -- do not select on their behalf. Present all four items together as one unified exchange.
 

package/README.md

@@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ Control how tool outputs are summarized for LLM context.
 | `/swarm pr-feedback [<pr-url\|owner/repo#N\|N>] [instructions...]` | Ingest and close known PR feedback (review comments, CI failures, conflicts) without a fresh review |
 | `/swarm pr subscribe <pr-url\|owner/repo#N\|N>` | Subscribe current session to PR monitoring (session-scoped); requires `pr_monitor.enabled: true` |
 | `/swarm pr unsubscribe <pr-url\|owner/repo#N\|N>` | Remove session's subscription to a PR |
-| `/swarm pr status` | List active PR subscriptions for current session with relative timestamps |
+| `/swarm pr status` | List active PR subscriptions for current session with relative timestamps (the `bunx opencode-swarm run pr status` CLI has no session context, so it lists subscriptions across all sessions) |
 | `/swarm deep-dive <scope> [--profile <name>] [--max-explorers <n>]` | Read-only codebase audit with parallel explorers, dual reviewers, and critic challenge |
 | `/swarm design-docs <description> [--out <dir>] [--lang <name>] [--update]` | Generate or sync language-agnostic design docs (requires `design_docs.enabled`) |
 | `/swarm dark-matter` | Detect hidden file couplings from co-change history |

package/dist/cli/{guardrail-explain-sw5bjxtk.js → guardrail-explain-qd243wrm.js}

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 // @bun
 import {
   handleGuardrailExplain
-} from "./index-fwb5f2gr.js";
-import"./index-jch711dq.js";
+} from "./index-09smngfp.js";
+import"./index-y72bw1wb.js";
 import"./index-g00qm2gf.js";
 import"./index-yhsmmv2z.js";
 import"./index-32axfg6h.js";

package/dist/cli/{index-fwb5f2gr.js → index-09smngfp.js}

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ import {
   detectPosixWrites,
   detectWindowsWrites,
   resolveWriteTargets
-} from "./index-jch711dq.js";
+} from "./index-y72bw1wb.js";
 import {
   checkFileAuthority,
   classifyFile,

package/dist/cli/{index-dkytd370.js → index-tjr1m8wf.js}

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 // @bun
 import {
   handleGuardrailExplain
-} from "./index-fwb5f2gr.js";
+} from "./index-09smngfp.js";
 import {
   handleGuardrailLog
 } from "./index-vjsr9bqt.js";
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ import {
   handleWriteRetroCommand,
   normalizeSwarmCommandInput,
   resolveCommand
-} from "./index-jch711dq.js";
+} from "./index-y72bw1wb.js";
 import"./index-g00qm2gf.js";
 import"./index-yhsmmv2z.js";
 import"./index-32axfg6h.js";