opencode-swarm 7.121.1 → 7.121.2

package/dist/cli/{index-e7yqazk3.js → index-y0qa3xf0.js}

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ import {
   saveTaskSetSnapshot,
   transientBackoff,
   validateProjectRoot
-} from "./index-j5xv8zbp.js";
+} from "./index-emkb0bbe.js";
 import {
   withTimeout
 } from "./index-4905hd2m.js";
@@ -95,15 +95,15 @@ import {
   retireSkill,
   selectCandidateEntries,
   syncBundledProjectSkillsIfMissingAsync
-} from "./index-78b192v7.js";
+} from "./index-x4fwtd59.js";
 import {
   readRecentEscalations
-} from "./index-0k4r8111.js";
+} from "./index-ft6jw816.js";
 import {
   alreadyCuratedThisGeneration,
   claimNextScanBatch,
   resolveCohortId
-} from "./index-0e1v02hq.js";
+} from "./index-j8349ac0.js";
 import {
   CURATOR_INIT_PROMPT,
   CURATOR_PHASE_PROMPT,
@@ -136,11 +136,11 @@ import {
   validateActionability,
   validateActionableFields,
   validateLesson
-} from "./index-3366gs26.js";
+} from "./index-db82jxt7.js";
 import {
   authorizeCuration,
   buildConfigFingerprintInput
-} from "./index-69ms9ny1.js";
+} from "./index-5a3xsnzg.js";
 import {
   cohortConfigFingerprint
 } from "./index-rtry5xyf.js";
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ import {
   transactFile,
   transactKnowledge,
   wordBigrams
-} from "./index-rywkdacj.js";
+} from "./index-0f800qg7.js";
 import {
   MAX_EVENT_LOG_ENTRIES,
   _internals,
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ import {
   recordHiveKnowledgeEvent,
   recordKnowledgeEvent,
   resolveKnowledgeEventsPath
-} from "./index-nhgw7de8.js";
+} from "./index-35xyj7gn.js";
 import {
   resolveHiveDataDir,
   resolveHiveEventsPath,
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ import {
 import {
   PlanSchema,
   RetrospectiveEvidenceSchema
-} from "./index-0mbmfmt0.js";
+} from "./index-qt2yaghg.js";
 import {
   AGENT_TOOL_MAP,
   ALL_SUBAGENT_NAMES,
@@ -9759,7 +9759,7 @@ async function runCuratorPhase(directory, phase, agentsDispatched, config, knowl
     }
     if (config.skill_generation_enabled === true && skillCandidates.length > 0) {
       try {
-        const skillModule = await import("./skill-generator-tkv7s12g.js");
+        const skillModule = await import("./skill-generator-hkyxdc3j.js");
         for (const cand of skillCandidates) {
           if (cand.confidence < (config.min_skill_confidence ?? DEFAULT_SKILL_MIN_CONFIDENCE)) {
             continue;
@@ -10096,7 +10096,7 @@ async function applyCuratorKnowledgeUpdates(directory, recommendations, knowledg
     } catch {}
   }
   if (contradictedEntries.length > 0 && knowledgeConfig.contradiction_threshold_action === "quarantine") {
-    const { maybeQuarantineOnContradiction } = await import("./knowledge-escalator-0ejqs8c9.js");
+    const { maybeQuarantineOnContradiction } = await import("./knowledge-escalator-8ajq1fhb.js");
     for (const { id } of contradictedEntries) {
       try {
         await maybeQuarantineOnContradiction(directory, id, knowledgeConfig.contradiction_quarantine_threshold, knowledgeConfig.contradiction_quarantine_window_days);
@@ -10894,7 +10894,7 @@ async function runCuratorPostMortem(directory, options = {}) {
       warnings.push("Failed to collect knowledge summary.");
     }
     try {
-      const { getScanStatus } = await import("./scan-cursor-qapm0sxj.js");
+      const { getScanStatus } = await import("./scan-cursor-qmsmmg1b.js");
       const scanStatus = await getScanStatus(directory);
       if (scanStatus.remaining_estimate > 0) {
         warnings.push(`Fair scan: reviewed ${knowledgeSummary.length} entries this sweep (generation ${scanStatus.generation}); ${scanStatus.remaining_estimate} more eligible entries will be visited in future curation sweeps.`);
@@ -11068,7 +11068,7 @@ var _internals15 = {
   loadDefaultKnowledgeConfig: async (directory) => {
     const { KnowledgeConfigSchema: KnowledgeConfigSchema2 } = await import("./schema-vwxpsk6j.js");
     try {
-      const { loadPluginConfigWithMeta: loadPluginConfigWithMeta2 } = await import("./index-fndvr7fr.js");
+      const { loadPluginConfigWithMeta: loadPluginConfigWithMeta2 } = await import("./index-rbfq77sz.js");
       const loaded = loadPluginConfigWithMeta2(directory);
       return KnowledgeConfigSchema2.parse(loaded.config.knowledge ?? {});
     } catch {
@@ -11076,11 +11076,11 @@ var _internals15 = {
     }
   },
   applyCuratorKnowledgeUpdates: async (directory, recommendations, knowledgeConfig, generation) => {
-    const { applyCuratorKnowledgeUpdates: applyCuratorKnowledgeUpdates2 } = await import("./curator-tesgq6ye.js");
+    const { applyCuratorKnowledgeUpdates: applyCuratorKnowledgeUpdates2 } = await import("./curator-mwvrryf3.js");
     return applyCuratorKnowledgeUpdates2(directory, recommendations, knowledgeConfig, generation);
   },
   checkHivePromotions: async (entries, knowledgeConfig, directory) => {
-    const { checkHivePromotions } = await import("./hive-promoter-4vfe1rcs.js");
+    const { checkHivePromotions } = await import("./hive-promoter-z4tw1gfv.js");
     return checkHivePromotions(entries, knowledgeConfig, directory);
   },
   applyProposalTriage: async (directory, triage) => {
@@ -11089,7 +11089,7 @@ var _internals15 = {
       activateProposal,
       listSkills: listSkills2,
       sanitizeSlug
-    } = await import("./skill-generator-tkv7s12g.js");
+    } = await import("./skill-generator-hkyxdc3j.js");
     const result = {
       approved: [],
       rejected: [],
@@ -13557,7 +13557,7 @@ function hashContent(content) {
 async function loadConfigForPolicyCurator(directory) {
   const { KnowledgeConfigSchema: KnowledgeConfigSchema2 } = await import("./schema-vwxpsk6j.js");
   try {
-    const { loadPluginConfigWithMeta: loadPluginConfigWithMeta2 } = await import("./index-fndvr7fr.js");
+    const { loadPluginConfigWithMeta: loadPluginConfigWithMeta2 } = await import("./index-rbfq77sz.js");
     const { config: loadedConfig } = loadPluginConfigWithMeta2(directory);
     return KnowledgeConfigSchema2.parse(loadedConfig.knowledge ?? {});
   } catch {
@@ -18867,8 +18867,8 @@ var _internals28 = {
   loadCuratorDeps: async () => {
     const [{ CuratorConfigSchema }, curator, { createCuratorLLMDelegate: createCuratorLLMDelegate2 }] = await Promise.all([
       import("./schema-vwxpsk6j.js"),
-      import("./curator-tesgq6ye.js"),
-      import("./curator-llm-factory-jkbachdb.js")
+      import("./curator-mwvrryf3.js"),
+      import("./curator-llm-factory-vcyvbny0.js")
     ]);
     return { CuratorConfigSchema, curator, createCuratorLLMDelegate: createCuratorLLMDelegate2 };
   }
@@ -19366,7 +19366,7 @@ import { fileURLToPath } from "url";
 // package.json
 var package_default = {
   name: "opencode-swarm",
-  version: "7.121.1",
+  version: "7.121.2",
   description: "Architect-centric agentic swarm plugin for OpenCode - hub-and-spoke orchestration with SME consultation, code generation, and QA review",
   main: "dist/index.js",
   types: "dist/index.d.ts",
@@ -19806,7 +19806,7 @@ async function computeCurationDiagnostics(directory, entries) {
   let scanCompleted = false;
   let scanRemaining = 0;
   try {
-    const { getScanStatus } = await import("./scan-cursor-qapm0sxj.js");
+    const { getScanStatus } = await import("./scan-cursor-qmsmmg1b.js");
     const status = await getScanStatus(directory);
     scanGeneration = status.generation;
     scanCompleted = status.completed;
@@ -19819,14 +19819,14 @@ async function computeCurationDiagnostics(directory, entries) {
       const { KnowledgeConfigSchema: KnowledgeConfigSchema2 } = await import("./schema-vwxpsk6j.js");
       let config;
       try {
-        const { loadPluginConfigWithMeta: loadPluginConfigWithMeta2 } = await import("./index-fndvr7fr.js");
+        const { loadPluginConfigWithMeta: loadPluginConfigWithMeta2 } = await import("./index-rbfq77sz.js");
         const loaded = loadPluginConfigWithMeta2(directory);
         config = KnowledgeConfigSchema2.parse(loaded.config.knowledge ?? {});
       } catch {
         config = KnowledgeConfigSchema2.parse({});
       }
       const { cohortConfigFingerprint: cohortConfigFingerprint2 } = await import("./config-fingerprint-v22xh5a2.js");
-      const { buildConfigFingerprintInput: buildConfigFingerprintInput2, readCohortConfigFingerprint } = await import("./curation-policy-re2kaysb.js");
+      const { buildConfigFingerprintInput: buildConfigFingerprintInput2, readCohortConfigFingerprint } = await import("./curation-policy-10wnhpwn.js");
       const currentFp = cohortConfigFingerprint2(buildConfigFingerprintInput2(config));
       const cohortFp = await readCohortConfigFingerprint(directory);
       configMatch = cohortFp === null ? null : currentFp === cohortFp;
@@ -21817,7 +21817,7 @@ async function handleEvidenceCommand(directory, args) {
   return formatTaskEvidenceMarkdown(evidenceData);
 }
 async function handleEvidenceSummaryCommand(directory) {
-  const { buildEvidenceSummary } = await import("./evidence-summary-service-jtx5q3r6.js");
+  const { buildEvidenceSummary } = await import("./evidence-summary-service-k14ykm03.js");
   const artifact = await buildEvidenceSummary(directory);
   if (!artifact) {
     return "No plan found. Run `/swarm plan` to check plan status.";
@@ -39194,7 +39194,7 @@ function buildDetailedHelp(commandName, entry) {
 async function handleHelpCommand(ctx) {
   const targetCommand = ctx.args.join(" ");
   if (!targetCommand) {
-    const { buildHelpText } = await import("./index-k7gvykn4.js");
+    const { buildHelpText } = await import("./index-2ygp3qq4.js");
     return buildHelpText();
   }
   const tokens = targetCommand.split(/\s+/);
@@ -39203,7 +39203,7 @@ async function handleHelpCommand(ctx) {
     return _internals61.buildDetailedHelp(resolved.key, resolved.entry);
   }
   const similar = _internals61.findSimilarCommands(targetCommand);
-  const { buildHelpText: fullHelp } = await import("./index-k7gvykn4.js");
+  const { buildHelpText: fullHelp } = await import("./index-2ygp3qq4.js");
   if (similar.length > 0) {
     return `Command '/swarm ${targetCommand}' not found.
 
@@ -39336,7 +39336,7 @@ var COMMAND_REGISTRY = {
   },
   "guardrail explain": {
     handler: async (ctx) => {
-      const { handleGuardrailExplain } = await import("./guardrail-explain-hqz48re6.js");
+      const { handleGuardrailExplain } = await import("./guardrail-explain-tgkk87z5.js");
       return handleGuardrailExplain(ctx.directory, ctx.args);
     },
     description: "Dry-run: show what the guardrails would do to a command or write target (executes nothing)",
@@ -39346,7 +39346,7 @@ var COMMAND_REGISTRY = {
   },
   "guardrail-explain": {
     handler: async (ctx) => {
-      const { handleGuardrailExplain } = await import("./guardrail-explain-hqz48re6.js");
+      const { handleGuardrailExplain } = await import("./guardrail-explain-tgkk87z5.js");
       return handleGuardrailExplain(ctx.directory, ctx.args);
     },
     description: "Dry-run: show what the guardrails would do to a command or write target (executes nothing)",
@@ -40597,6 +40597,8 @@ DELEGATION ENVELOPE FIELDS \u2014 include these in every delegation for traceabi
 
 Before delegating to {{AGENT_PREFIX}}reviewer: call check_gate_status for the current task_id and include the gate results in the GATES field of the reviewer message. Format: GATES: lint=PASS/FAIL, sast_scan=PASS/FAIL, secretscan=PASS/FAIL (use PASS/FAIL/skipped for each gate). If no gates have been run yet, use GATES: none.
 
+ACCEPTANCE FIELD RESOLUTION \u2014 before every {{AGENT_PREFIX}}coder (and {{AGENT_PREFIX}}reviewer) delegation, populate that delegation's ACCEPTANCE field like this: (1) read the current task's \`fr_refs\` from the plan; (2) if \`fr_refs\` is non-empty, look up EVERY listed FR-###/SC-### id in the current \`.swarm/spec.md\` and copy each one's full requirement text into ACCEPTANCE VERBATIM \u2014 byte-for-byte, no summarizing or paraphrasing, and concatenate all of them when a task maps to more than one; (3) if \`fr_refs\` is empty or absent, populate ACCEPTANCE with a task-derived one-line restatement of what DONE looks like instead (the same pattern as \`acceptanceCriteria\` above). ACCEPTANCE must never be empty \u2014 lacking a spec mapping is normal and is not a reason to omit it.
+
 <!-- BEHAVIORAL_GUIDANCE_START -->
 PARTIAL GATE RATIONALIZATIONS \u2014 automated gates \u2260 agent review. Running SOME gates is NOT compliance:
   \u2717 "I ran pre_check_batch so the code is verified" \u2192 pre_check_batch does NOT replace {{AGENT_PREFIX}}reviewer or {{AGENT_PREFIX}}test_engineer
@@ -40773,7 +40775,7 @@ FILE: src/auth/login.ts
 INPUT: Validate email format, password >= 8 chars
 OUTPUT: Modified file
 CONSTRAINT: Do not modify other functions
-ACCEPTANCE: Populate from the plan task's acceptance criteria / FR / SC when the task has them (one item per line, or FR-/SC-style references), so the coder can gate its implementation on each. Omit the field entirely when the task has no structured acceptance criteria.
+ACCEPTANCE: [copied verbatim from spec.md, or a task-derived DONE restatement \u2014 see ACCEPTANCE FIELD RESOLUTION]
 SKILLS: file:.claude/skills/engineering-conventions/SKILL.md
 
 {{AGENT_PREFIX}}reviewer
@@ -40781,8 +40783,9 @@ TASK: Review login validation
 FILE: src/auth/login.ts
 CHECK: [security, correctness, edge-cases]
 GATES: lint=PASS, sast_scan=PASS, secretscan=PASS
+ACCEPTANCE: [copied verbatim from spec.md, or a task-derived DONE restatement \u2014 see ACCEPTANCE FIELD RESOLUTION; same text as the coder delegation for this task]
 SKILLS_USED_BY_CODER: file:.claude/skills/engineering-conventions/SKILL.md
-OUTPUT: VERDICT + RISK + ISSUES
+OUTPUT: VERDICT + RISK + ISSUES + ACCEPTANCE_SATISFACTION
 SKILLS: file:.claude/skills/engineering-conventions/SKILL.md
 
 {{AGENT_PREFIX}}test_engineer
@@ -42307,7 +42310,7 @@ AUTOMATIC REJECTION: Any vaporware indicator triggers immediate rejection before
 Emit event: 'reviewer_substance_check' with fields: { function_name: string, issue_type: string }
 
 TIER 1: CORRECTNESS (mandatory, always run)
-Does the code do what the task acceptance criteria require? Check: every acceptance criterion has corresponding implementation. First-error focus: if you find a correctness issue, stop. Report it. Do not continue to style or optimization issues.
+Does the code do what the task acceptance criteria require? Check: every acceptance criterion has corresponding implementation. When your input includes an ACCEPTANCE field, that field \u2014 not your own impression of "looks correct" \u2014 is the authoritative acceptance criteria: verify the diff satisfies EVERY requirement stated in ACCEPTANCE (including verbatim FR/SC text when the task maps to one or more spec requirements), not merely that the diff is well-formed or plausible in isolation. A diff that is clean, idiomatic, and bug-free but does not satisfy an ACCEPTANCE requirement is a Tier 1 CORRECTNESS failure. First-error focus: if you find a correctness issue, stop. Report it. Do not continue to style or optimization issues.
 
 TIER 2: SAFETY (mandatory for MODERATE+, always for COMPLEX)
 Does the code introduce security vulnerabilities, data loss risks, or breaking changes? Check against: SAST findings, secret scan results, import analysis. Anti-rubber-stamp: "No issues found" requires evidence. State what you checked.
@@ -42345,9 +42348,12 @@ DIFF: [changed files/functions, or "infer from FILE" if omitted]
 AFFECTS: [callers/consumers/dependents to inspect, or "infer from diff"]
 CHECK: [list of dimensions to evaluate]
 GATES: [pre-completed gate results (lint, SAST, secretscan, etc.), or "none" if unavailable]
+ACCEPTANCE: [verbatim FR/SC requirement text this diff must satisfy, copied byte-for-byte from spec.md when the task maps to one or more FR-###/SC-### items \u2014 never a paraphrase or summary. When the task maps to no spec requirement, this is a task-derived, one-line restatement of what DONE looks like instead. This field is never empty.]
 SKILLS: [optional \u2014 either "none", repo-relative file: references (preferred), or inline skill content pasted by architect]
 SKILLS_USED_BY_CODER: [list of skill paths that were passed to the coder for this task, or "none" if no skills were used]
 
+ACCEPTANCE HANDLING: ACCEPTANCE is the authoritative definition of "done" for this task \u2014 evaluate the diff against it explicitly and directly, not only against your own general impression of code quality or correctness in isolation. Before writing your verdict, check EACH item in ACCEPTANCE against the diff and be prepared to state whether it is met. If the diff fails to satisfy any item in ACCEPTANCE, that is a Tier 1 CORRECTNESS failure \u2014 REJECT even if the code otherwise looks clean and well-written, and cite the specific unmet ACCEPTANCE item(s) in your FIXES.
+
 SKILLS HANDLING: If SKILLS is present and not "none", read the skill names/descriptions first, then load every referenced skill that applies before beginning your review. If uncertain whether a skill applies, load it.
 - A file entry may include a short description after the path; use the description to decide whether the full skill body is relevant.
 - For \`file:\` entries, use the search tool to read the referenced \`SKILL.md\` file with \`include\` set to that exact repo-relative path, \`mode: regex\`, \`query: .*\`, \`max_results: 1000\`, and \`max_lines: 1000\`.
@@ -42373,6 +42379,7 @@ VERDICT: APPROVED | REJECTED
 REUSE_RE_VERIFICATION: [VERIFIED | DUPLICATION_DETECTED | SKIPPED] \u2014 DUPLICATION_DETECTED is only valid when VERDICT is REJECTED
 RISK: LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH | CRITICAL
 ISSUES: list with line numbers, grouped by CHECK dimension
+ACCEPTANCE_SATISFACTION: SATISFIED | PARTIAL | NOT_SATISFIED \u2014 one line per item in the input ACCEPTANCE field, stating explicitly whether the diff satisfies it (with evidence: file:line or "no corresponding implementation found"). This is a distinct question from "does the diff look correct" \u2014 assess conformance to ACCEPTANCE even when the diff is otherwise well-written. NOT_SATISFIED on any item forces VERDICT: REJECTED.
 TASK: [task id being reviewed, or "unknown"]
 SKILL_COMPLIANCE: COMPLIANT | PARTIAL | VIOLATED \u2014 [list of violations or "all rules followed"]
 DIRECTIVE_COMPLIANCE: one line per knowledge directive shown during this phase (IDs listed in the DIRECTIVES TO VERIFY block of your prompt, when present). Use exactly one of:

package/dist/cli/index.js

@@ -7,28 +7,28 @@ import {
   getPluginLockFilePaths,
   package_default,
   resolveCommand
-} from "./index-e7yqazk3.js";
+} from "./index-y0qa3xf0.js";
 import"./index-kyvg2cmp.js";
 import"./index-vqcgmy4y.js";
-import"./index-j5xv8zbp.js";
+import"./index-emkb0bbe.js";
 import"./index-4905hd2m.js";
 import"./index-nprawcc0.js";
-import"./index-78b192v7.js";
-import"./index-0k4r8111.js";
-import"./index-0e1v02hq.js";
+import"./index-x4fwtd59.js";
+import"./index-ft6jw816.js";
+import"./index-j8349ac0.js";
 import"./index-vxv732ex.js";
 import"./index-c8s9a3zh.js";
 import"./index-816rkp4y.js";
 import"./index-22e127jw.js";
-import"./index-3366gs26.js";
-import"./index-69ms9ny1.js";
+import"./index-db82jxt7.js";
+import"./index-5a3xsnzg.js";
 import"./index-rtry5xyf.js";
-import"./index-rywkdacj.js";
-import"./index-nhgw7de8.js";
+import"./index-0f800qg7.js";
+import"./index-35xyj7gn.js";
 import"./index-ae75rja9.js";
 import"./index-3jvqw5hy.js";
 import"./index-9xpgytj9.js";
-import"./index-0mbmfmt0.js";
+import"./index-qt2yaghg.js";
 import"./index-gnp9x6se.js";
 import {
   DEFAULT_AGENT_CONFIGS

package/dist/cli/{knowledge-escalator-0ejqs8c9.js → knowledge-escalator-8ajq1fhb.js}

@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ import {
   maybeEscalateOnViolation,
   maybeQuarantineOnContradiction,
   readRecentEscalations
-} from "./index-0k4r8111.js";
-import"./index-rywkdacj.js";
-import"./index-nhgw7de8.js";
+} from "./index-ft6jw816.js";
+import"./index-0f800qg7.js";
+import"./index-35xyj7gn.js";
 import"./index-ae75rja9.js";
 import"./index-3jvqw5hy.js";
 import"./index-4rhcth7a.js";

package/dist/cli/{knowledge-events-wx9e37ba.js → knowledge-events-2sjy3aa7.js}

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ import {
   resolveKnowledgeCounterBaselinePath,
   resolveKnowledgeEventsPath,
   resolveLegacyApplicationLogPath
-} from "./index-nhgw7de8.js";
+} from "./index-35xyj7gn.js";
 import"./index-ae75rja9.js";
 import"./index-3jvqw5hy.js";
 import"./index-zgwm4ryv.js";

package/dist/cli/{knowledge-store-rnajx33a.js → knowledge-store-27cesthc.js}

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ import {
   transactKnowledge,
   transactKnowledgeWithCas,
   wordBigrams
-} from "./index-rywkdacj.js";
+} from "./index-0f800qg7.js";
 import {
   resolveHiveDataDir
 } from "./index-ae75rja9.js";

package/dist/cli/{knowledge-validator-1f4mkzmc.js → knowledge-validator-9keh3p8j.js}

@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ import {
   validateLesson,
   validateSkillCandidatePath,
   validateSkillPath
-} from "./index-3366gs26.js";
-import"./index-69ms9ny1.js";
+} from "./index-db82jxt7.js";
+import"./index-5a3xsnzg.js";
 import"./index-rtry5xyf.js";
-import"./index-rywkdacj.js";
-import"./index-nhgw7de8.js";
+import"./index-0f800qg7.js";
+import"./index-35xyj7gn.js";
 import"./index-ae75rja9.js";
 import"./index-3jvqw5hy.js";
 import"./index-4rhcth7a.js";

package/dist/cli/{scan-cursor-qapm0sxj.js → scan-cursor-qmsmmg1b.js}

@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ import {
   alreadyCuratedThisGeneration,
   claimNextScanBatch,
   getScanStatus
-} from "./index-0e1v02hq.js";
-import"./index-rywkdacj.js";
+} from "./index-j8349ac0.js";
+import"./index-0f800qg7.js";
 import"./index-ae75rja9.js";
 import"./index-3jvqw5hy.js";
 import"./index-4rhcth7a.js";

package/dist/cli/{skill-generator-tkv7s12g.js → skill-generator-hkyxdc3j.js}

@@ -33,12 +33,12 @@ import {
   sanitizeSlug,
   selectCandidateEntries,
   writeEvalStub
-} from "./index-78b192v7.js";
-import"./index-3366gs26.js";
-import"./index-69ms9ny1.js";
+} from "./index-x4fwtd59.js";
+import"./index-db82jxt7.js";
+import"./index-5a3xsnzg.js";
 import"./index-rtry5xyf.js";
-import"./index-rywkdacj.js";
-import"./index-nhgw7de8.js";
+import"./index-0f800qg7.js";
+import"./index-35xyj7gn.js";
 import"./index-ae75rja9.js";
 import"./index-3jvqw5hy.js";
 import"./index-4rhcth7a.js";

package/dist/config/plan-schema.d.ts

@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ export declare const TaskSchema: z.ZodObject<{
     files_touched: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString>>;
     evidence_path: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodString>;
     blocked_reason: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodString>;
+    fr_refs: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString>>;
 }, z.core.$strip>;
 export type Task = z.infer<typeof TaskSchema>;
 export declare const PhaseSchema: z.ZodObject<{
@@ -103,6 +104,7 @@ export declare const PhaseSchema: z.ZodObject<{
         files_touched: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString>>;
         evidence_path: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodString>;
         blocked_reason: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodString>;
+        fr_refs: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString>>;
     }, z.core.$strip>>>;
     type: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodEnum<{
         code: "code";
@@ -148,6 +150,7 @@ export declare const PlanSchema: z.ZodObject<{
             files_touched: z.ZodDefault<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString>>;
             evidence_path: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodString>;
             blocked_reason: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodString>;
+            fr_refs: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodArray<z.ZodString>>;
         }, z.core.$strip>>>;
         type: z.ZodOptional<z.ZodEnum<{
             code: "code";

package/dist/hooks/delegation-gate.d.ts

@@ -66,6 +66,20 @@ interface ValidationContext {
 /**
  * Validates a DelegationEnvelope against the current plan and agent list.
  * Returns { valid: true } on success, or { valid: false; reason: string } on failure.
+ *
+ * NOTE (#1687, kept SEPARATE from {@link validateCoderReviewerAcceptanceField}):
+ * this validator operates on a *structured* `DelegationEnvelope` object recovered
+ * from the OLD `KEY:VALUE` envelope format (`taskId:`/`targetAgent:`/`action:`/
+ * `commandType:`/`files:`/`acceptanceCriteria:`) and is consumed ADVISORY-ONLY,
+ * POST-execution via {@link appendDelegationEnvelopeAdvisory} in `toolAfter` (it
+ * never throws). The free-text coder/reviewer format
+ * (`TASK:`/`FILE:`/`ACCEPTANCE:`) does NOT parse into this shape
+ * (`parseDelegationEnvelope` returns `null`), so this path never fires on a real
+ * coder/reviewer dispatch. The pre-dispatch, BLOCKING acceptance-field gate for
+ * the free-text format lives in {@link validateCoderReviewerAcceptanceField};
+ * the two are intentionally not merged (advisory-vs-blocking, structured-vs-
+ * free-text are different contracts). Do not delete this function — it retains a
+ * real purpose for the old envelope format and other delegation types.
  */
 export declare function validateDelegationEnvelope(envelope: unknown, context: ValidationContext): EnvelopeValidationResult;
 /**
@@ -87,6 +101,107 @@ export declare function validateDelegationEnvelope(envelope: unknown, context: V
  *   the side effect (advisory push) is the production purpose.
  */
 export declare function appendDelegationEnvelopeAdvisory(session: AgentSessionState, promptText: string, context: ValidationContext): EnvelopeValidationResult | null;
+/**
+ * FR-003 / SC-003 / SC-004 (issue #1687): pre-dispatch acceptance-criteria
+ * enforcement for **coder and reviewer** delegations, operating on the REAL
+ * free-text delegation prompt (`TASK:`/`FILE:`/`INPUT:`/`OUTPUT:`/`CONSTRAINT:`/
+ * `ACCEPTANCE:`/`SKILLS:`) the architect actually sends via the native Task tool.
+ *
+ * Deliberately kept SEPARATE from {@link validateDelegationEnvelope} (see the
+ * sibling note there), NOT a rename/reuse of it, because the semantics differ on
+ * two axes: this function parses the FREE-TEXT `ACCEPTANCE:` line (not a
+ * structured envelope object) and is consumed as a BLOCKING, PRE-execution
+ * (`toolBefore`) gate (not the advisory, post-execution `toolAfter` path that
+ * `validateDelegationEnvelope` feeds via {@link appendDelegationEnvelopeAdvisory}).
+ * The two formats never overlap — `parseDelegationEnvelope` returns `null` for
+ * the free-text coder/reviewer format — so merging them would conflate
+ * advisory-vs-blocking and structured-vs-free-text contracts. M15's advisory
+ * mechanism is left fully intact for the old envelope format and other
+ * delegation types.
+ *
+ * A dispatch passes when an `ACCEPTANCE:` line exists AND the field carries
+ * non-empty, non-whitespace content — either INLINE on the header line (the
+ * architect-instructed same-line format) OR on the lines that FOLLOW a bare
+ * `ACCEPTANCE:` header, up to (but excluding) the next INPUT-FORMAT field header
+ * (`^[A-Z][A-Z0-9_]*:`, e.g. `SKILLS:`) or end of input. The multi-line form is
+ * a plausible way to paste a verbatim FR/SC body that spans lines (PR #1864
+ * review feedback), so treating a bare header + following content as EMPTY would
+ * false-block a good-faith copy. The next-field-header terminator ensures
+ * content belonging to the NEXT field (e.g. `SKILLS: none`) is never miscounted
+ * as ACCEPTANCE content — an empty `ACCEPTANCE:` immediately followed by another
+ * field is still correctly rejected as empty. Prompts are split on `\r?\n` so a
+ * trailing `\r` (CRLF-authored prompts) never leaks into the captured content.
+ *
+ * Only NON-EMPTINESS is enforced here; verbatim-coverage of the mapped FR/SC
+ * bodies is a SEPARATE, later check ({@link checkAcceptanceCoversFrRefs}) that
+ * already newline-normalizes the whole prompt, so multi-line ACCEPTANCE content
+ * is visible to it regardless.
+ *
+ * @param promptText the assembled delegation prompt (all text-bearing Task args
+ *   joined).
+ * @returns `{ valid: true }` when the ACCEPTANCE field is present and non-empty;
+ *   otherwise `{ valid: false, reason }` with a diagnosable reason the caller
+ *   turns into a blocking, pre-dispatch error.
+ */
+export declare function validateCoderReviewerAcceptanceField(promptText: string): {
+    valid: boolean;
+    reason?: 'acceptance_field_missing' | 'acceptance_field_empty';
+};
+/**
+ * FR-001/FR-002/FR-005/SC-001/SC-002/SC-006 (issue #1687): pull the verbatim
+ * requirement BODY for a single spec id (`FR-###` / `SC-###`) out of `spec.md`.
+ *
+ * spec.md requirements are bold-prefixed bullets, one per (possibly wrapped)
+ * bullet, e.g.
+ *   `- **FR-000 — Structured task-to-FR mapping.** The plan task model SHALL ...`
+ *   `- **SC-000 (FR-000).** Given a plan ..., then ...`
+ * The requirement BODY is the text AFTER the FIRST closing `**` of the leading
+ * bold span — i.e. everything past the `**...**` id/title prefix. Handles both
+ * FR-### and SC-### uniformly (no special-casing) and stitches on any
+ * immediately-following continuation lines of a wrapped bullet until the next
+ * bullet / next FR-|SC- bullet / a blank line / a markdown heading.
+ *
+ * @returns the raw (untrimmed) body string, or `null` when the id is not present
+ *   in the spec (unknown/typo/renamed) — the caller treats null as fail-open skip.
+ */
+export declare function extractSpecRequirementBodyById(specText: string, id: string): string | null;
+/**
+ * FR-001/FR-002 (issue #1687): symmetric normalization applied identically to
+ * BOTH the extracted spec body AND the ACCEPTANCE prompt text before the
+ * substring-coverage compare. Asymmetric normalization would false-block, so this
+ * is deliberately the single shared normalizer. Strips markdown emphasis/code
+ * markers and leading list markers, folds punctuation the architect's LLM copy
+ * routinely substitutes (dash-width, curly-vs-straight quotes) so a good-faith
+ * verbatim copy is not false-blocked on a `—`→`--` or `'`→`'` swap, collapses
+ * ALL whitespace (incl. newlines) to single spaces, trims, and lowercases. Every
+ * fold is symmetric (both sides go through this one function), so it can only
+ * REDUCE false-blocks — it never opens a bypass, since covered/uncovered still
+ * differ by whole words, not punctuation.
+ */
+export declare function normalizeAcceptanceText(s: string): string;
+/**
+ * FR-001/FR-002/FR-005/SC-001/SC-002/SC-006 (issue #1687): mechanical coverage
+ * check that the ACCEPTANCE text CONTAINS the verbatim requirement body for each
+ * mapped spec id. Fail-open by construction:
+ *  - an id not present in spec.md (unknown/typo/renamed) is SKIPPED, never blocked;
+ *  - an id whose body normalizes to empty is SKIPPED (neither trivially covered
+ *    nor a miss);
+ *  - each id is checked INDEPENDENTLY (per-id substring), because the architect
+ *    concatenates multiple requirement bodies with an UNSPECIFIED separator — a
+ *    whole-string equality compare would false-block multi-FR tasks.
+ *
+ * @returns `{ covered: true }` when every id is present-and-covered or skipped;
+ *   `{ covered: false, missingId }` naming the FIRST id whose body is not a
+ *   substring of the ACCEPTANCE text.
+ */
+export declare function checkAcceptanceCoversFrRefs(params: {
+    acceptanceText: string;
+    frRefs: string[];
+    specText: string;
+}): {
+    covered: boolean;
+    missingId?: string;
+};
 interface MessageInfo {
     role: string;
     agent?: string;