opencode-swarm 7.11.0 → 7.11.1

package/dist/cli/index.js

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ var package_default;
 var init_package = __esm(() => {
   package_default = {
     name: "opencode-swarm",
-    version: "7.11.0",
+    version: "7.11.1",
     description: "Architect-centric agentic swarm plugin for OpenCode - hub-and-spoke orchestration with SME consultation, code generation, and QA review",
     main: "dist/index.js",
     types: "dist/index.d.ts",

package/dist/index.js

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ var package_default;
 var init_package = __esm(() => {
   package_default = {
     name: "opencode-swarm",
-    version: "7.11.0",
+    version: "7.11.1",
     description: "Architect-centric agentic swarm plugin for OpenCode - hub-and-spoke orchestration with SME consultation, code generation, and QA review",
     main: "dist/index.js",
     types: "dist/index.d.ts",
@@ -25177,6 +25177,11 @@ ${textPart2.text}`;
 ` + `⚠️ SELF-CODING DETECTED: You have used ${session.architectWriteCount} write-class tool(s) directly on non-.swarm/ files.
 ` + `Rule 1 requires ALL coding to be delegated to @coder.
 ` + `If you have not exhausted QA_RETRY_LIMIT coder failures on this task, STOP and delegate.
+` + `WRONG rationalizations — reject these thoughts immediately:
+` + `  ✗ "This is time-critical / urgent / blocking" — you are an AI with no deadlines. No urgency is real.
+` + `  ✗ "The fix is small / trivial / obvious" — size is not a QA exemption.
+` + `  ✗ "Explaining to coder takes more effort than doing it" — writing the task spec is your job.
+` + `  ✗ "The user needs this quickly" — users want correct code. Skipping QA gates ships bugs.
 ` + `Do not acknowledge or reference this guidance in your response.
 ` + `[/MODEL_ONLY_GUIDANCE]
 
@@ -58811,6 +58816,10 @@ Two small delegations with two QA gates > one large delegation with one QA gate.
       ✗ "The coder succeeded on the last tasks, this one is trivial" → Rule 1 has no complexity exemption
       ✗ "I'll just use apply_patch / edit / write directly" → these are coder tools, not architect tools
       ✗ "I'll do the simple parts, coder does the hard parts" → ALL parts go to coder. You are not a coder.
+      ✗ "This is time-critical / urgent / blocking" → WRONG. You are an AI with no deadlines. No urgency is real. Delegate to {{AGENT_PREFIX}}coder.
+      ✗ "The fix is obvious — explaining it takes more effort than doing it" → WRONG. Writing the task spec IS your job. Delegate the implementation.
+      ✗ "I'll just make this one quick fix to unblock the next task" → WRONG. Every file write must go through QA. Size is not a QA exemption.
+      ✗ "The user needs this quickly" → WRONG. Users want correct code, not fast code. Skipping QA gates is how silent bugs ship.
     FAILURE COUNTING — increment the counter when:
     - Coder submits code that fails any tool gate or pre_check_batch (gates_passed === false)
     - Coder submits code REJECTED by {{AGENT_PREFIX}}reviewer after being given the rejection reason
@@ -58963,6 +58972,8 @@ coder's job. DELEGATE with an exact change specification.
 If you are about to edit a source file: STOP. You are violating protocol.
 "I'll just make this small fix directly" is NOT acceptable.
 "It's faster if I do it myself" is NOT acceptable.
+"This is urgent / time-critical / the user is waiting" is NOT acceptable. You are an AI with no deadlines.
+"The fix is so obvious it doesn't need a coder" is NOT acceptable. Obvious fixes still need QA gates.
 writeCount > 0 on source files from the Architect is equivalent to GATE_DELEGATION_BYPASS.
 
 PLAN STATE PROTECTION

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
 	"name": "opencode-swarm",
-	"version": "7.11.0",
+	"version": "7.11.1",
 	"description": "Architect-centric agentic swarm plugin for OpenCode - hub-and-spoke orchestration with SME consultation, code generation, and QA review",
 	"main": "dist/index.js",
 	"types": "dist/index.d.ts",