opencode-skills-collection 4.1.3 → 4.1.4
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Potentially problematic release.
This version of opencode-skills-collection might be problematic. Click here for more details.
- package/bundled-skills/.antigravity-install-manifest.json +23 -1
- package/bundled-skills/ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking/SKILL.md +124 -0
- package/bundled-skills/ai-agent-tool-routing/SKILL.md +136 -0
- package/bundled-skills/ai-code-generation-guardrails/SKILL.md +142 -0
- package/bundled-skills/ai-prompt-regression-testing/SKILL.md +130 -0
- package/bundled-skills/antigravity-maintainer-batch-release/SKILL.md +11 -7
- package/bundled-skills/cline-pilot/README.md +138 -0
- package/bundled-skills/cline-pilot/SKILL.md +301 -0
- package/bundled-skills/cline-pilot/assets/global-memory-bank-prompt.en.md +66 -0
- package/bundled-skills/cline-pilot/assets/global-memory-bank-prompt.md +56 -0
- package/bundled-skills/cline-pilot/references/cold-start.md +58 -0
- package/bundled-skills/cline-pilot/references/decision-log.example.md +9 -0
- package/bundled-skills/cline-pilot/references/local-config.example.md +26 -0
- package/bundled-skills/cline-pilot/references/project-profiles.example.md +10 -0
- package/bundled-skills/cline-pilot/scripts/session_report.py +151 -0
- package/bundled-skills/cross-chain-relayer-audit/SKILL.md +136 -0
- package/bundled-skills/defi-yield-strategy-allocator/SKILL.md +124 -0
- package/bundled-skills/dropthehassle-publish/SKILL.md +151 -0
- package/bundled-skills/smart-contract-formal-verification/SKILL.md +136 -0
- package/bundled-skills/smart-contract-upgrade-governance/SKILL.md +130 -0
- package/bundled-skills/soroban-contract-audit/SKILL.md +136 -0
- package/bundled-skills/soroban-liquidity-pool/SKILL.md +118 -0
- package/bundled-skills/soroban-oracle-data-feed-audit/SKILL.md +118 -0
- package/bundled-skills/soroban-storage-ttl-lifecycle/SKILL.md +118 -0
- package/bundled-skills/soroban-token-minter/SKILL.md +124 -0
- package/bundled-skills/stellar-anchor-integration/SKILL.md +136 -0
- package/bundled-skills/stellar-asset-clawback-compliance/SKILL.md +118 -0
- package/bundled-skills/stellar-escrow-timelock/SKILL.md +118 -0
- package/bundled-skills/stellar-multisig-threshold-coordinator/SKILL.md +112 -0
- package/bundled-skills/waf-setup/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/bundled-skills/web3-rate-limiting-circuit-breaker/SKILL.md +130 -0
- package/bundled-skills/web3-transaction-relayer-pool/SKILL.md +124 -0
- package/bundled-skills/zk-proof-verification-pipeline/SKILL.md +124 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills_index.json +805 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: soroban-storage-ttl-lifecycle
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Soroban ledger state rent and TTL extension register: live state tracking, bump thresholds, rent fee reserves, and archive boundaries.'
|
|
4
|
+
category: engineering
|
|
5
|
+
risk: safe
|
|
6
|
+
source: self
|
|
7
|
+
source_type: self
|
|
8
|
+
date_added: "2026-10-01"
|
|
9
|
+
author: Ranjeet2063
|
|
10
|
+
tags: [soroban, storage, ttl, state-archival, stellar, gas, rust]
|
|
11
|
+
tools: []
|
|
12
|
+
source_repo: Ranjeet2063/agentic-awesome-skills
|
|
13
|
+
---
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
# Soroban Storage TTL & Rent Lifecycle
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
**What it is:** Tracks storage TTL exhaustion boundaries, automated ledger rent extensions, and archival prevention policies for production Soroban contracts.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Overview
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Provides a standardized, auditable framework and data model for **Soroban Storage TTL & Rent Lifecycle** operations across distributed engineering and decentralized application systems.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## When to Use This Skill
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- When formalizing architectural contracts, security invariants, or operational limits for Soroban Storage TTL & Rent Lifecycle.
|
|
26
|
+
- When cross-functional review is required between protocol developers, smart contract auditors, and AI engineering agents.
|
|
27
|
+
- When generating reproducible CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, and Notion property registers for tracking compliance.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## How It Works
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
1. Define the parameters, thresholds, and identity bindings required for the target operational register.
|
|
32
|
+
2. Select appropriate boundary enforcement values from validated enum select sets.
|
|
33
|
+
3. Export standardized artifacts (CSV table, SQL DDL, JSON Schema) to integrate into validation CI pipelines.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Field Reference
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
| # | Field Name | Type | SQL Type | JSON Schema Type | Notion Property Type | Example Value |
|
|
38
|
+
|---|------------|------|----------|------------------|----------------------|---------------|
|
|
39
|
+
| 1 | TTL Monitoring ID | `id` | `SERIAL PRIMARY KEY` | `integer` | Text | `TTL-001` |
|
|
40
|
+
| 2 | Contract Address | `text` | `VARCHAR(56)` | `string` | Text | `CVLT...` |
|
|
41
|
+
| 3 | Storage Tier Lifetime | `select` | `VARCHAR(32)` | `string` | Select | `Persistent` |
|
|
42
|
+
| 4 | Key Identifier Name | `text` | `VARCHAR(64)` | `string` | Text | `UserShareBalance` |
|
|
43
|
+
| 5 | Current TTL Remaining Ledgers | `number` | `INTEGER` | `number` | Number | `125000` |
|
|
44
|
+
| 6 | Minimum Threshold Ledgers | `number` | `INTEGER` | `number` | Number | `50000` |
|
|
45
|
+
| 7 | Auto-Bump Amount Ledgers | `number` | `INTEGER` | `number` | Number | `250000` |
|
|
46
|
+
| 8 | Rent Fee Budget XLM | `currency` | `NUMERIC(14,7)` | `number` | Number | `10.0000000` |
|
|
47
|
+
| 9 | Archival Risk Status | `select` | `VARCHAR(32)` | `string` | Select | `Safe Extended` |
|
|
48
|
+
| 10 | Last Extended Ledger | `number` | `BIGINT` | `number` | Number | `54820100` |
|
|
49
|
+
| 11 | Monitoring Audit Date | `date` | `DATE` | `string, format: date` | Date | `2026-10-01` |
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## Select Options
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**Storage Tier Lifetime**
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
Instance | Persistent | Temporary
|
|
57
|
+
```
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
**Archival Risk Status**
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
```
|
|
62
|
+
Safe Extended | Threshold Reached | Critical Expiring | Archived
|
|
63
|
+
```
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
## Relations
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
- `Audit Reference` -> links to the formal review documentation or test repository.
|
|
68
|
+
- `Target Architecture` -> links to the deployed contract or autonomous agent runtime component.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Examples
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
**Prompt**
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
```
|
|
75
|
+
How do I configure and track Soroban Storage TTL & Rent Lifecycle for our production environment?
|
|
76
|
+
```
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
**Recommended Next Step**
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
> Generate the unified field schema, SQL DDL migration, and JSON validation schema to register into your system catalog.
|
|
81
|
+
>
|
|
82
|
+
> Workflow: Define criteria -> Run automated verification -> Record baseline -> Monitor invariants.
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
## Best Practices
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
- Enforce strict typing on numerical bounds and currency amounts; avoid unstructured free-text fields for critical states.
|
|
87
|
+
- Re-run validation test suites on every state-altering commit or parameter change.
|
|
88
|
+
- Keep example data synthetic and isolated from production cryptographic keys or private endpoints.
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
## Limitations
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
- Provides architectural specifications, data models, and verification schemas; does not execute direct transaction signing without authorized external tooling.
|
|
93
|
+
- Requires network connectivity and valid RPC credentials when querying on-chain states.
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
## Security & Safety Notes
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
- All parameters declare `risk: safe`. No unauthorized state modification or privileged credential access is performed.
|
|
98
|
+
- Use synthetic dummy keys and mock addresses in test suites and local verification scripts.
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
- **Problem:** Mismatched decimal precision between contract runtime and database register.
|
|
103
|
+
**Solution:** Always verify decimals using the explicit field mapping in this reference.
|
|
104
|
+
- **Problem:** Missing authorization checks prior to state update.
|
|
105
|
+
**Solution:** Cross-validate against the Security Audit register before deployment.
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
## Related Skills
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
- @soroban-contract-audit - provides the security checklist and vulnerability categorization.
|
|
110
|
+
- @soroban-oracle-data-feed-audit - covers oracle heartbeat and stale-price handling.
|
|
111
|
+
- @web3-rate-limiting-circuit-breaker - provides operational guardrails and threshold breakers.
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
## Reusable Prompt
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
```
|
|
116
|
+
I want to establish a verified Soroban Storage TTL & Rent Lifecycle register for our production protocol.
|
|
117
|
+
Guide me through the required field parameters and output the corresponding SQL DDL and JSON Schema.
|
|
118
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: soroban-token-minter
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Soroban SEP-41 token contract architecture register: admin control, supply caps, metadata standard, and transfer event emissions on Stellar.'
|
|
4
|
+
category: engineering
|
|
5
|
+
risk: safe
|
|
6
|
+
source: self
|
|
7
|
+
source_type: self
|
|
8
|
+
date_added: "2026-10-01"
|
|
9
|
+
author: Ranjeet2063
|
|
10
|
+
tags: [stellar, soroban, token, sep-41, defi, web3, rust]
|
|
11
|
+
tools: []
|
|
12
|
+
source_repo: Ranjeet2063/agentic-awesome-skills
|
|
13
|
+
---
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
# Soroban Token Minting Architecture
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
**What it is:** Maintains technical specifications, supply parameters, and administrative controls for SEP-41 compliant fungible token implementations on Soroban.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Overview
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Provides a standardized, auditable framework and data model for **Soroban Token Minting Architecture** operations across distributed engineering and decentralized application systems.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## When to Use This Skill
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- When formalizing architectural contracts, security invariants, or operational limits for Soroban Token Minting Architecture.
|
|
26
|
+
- When cross-functional review is required between protocol developers, smart contract auditors, and AI engineering agents.
|
|
27
|
+
- When generating reproducible CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, and Notion property registers for tracking compliance.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## How It Works
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
1. Define the parameters, thresholds, and identity bindings required for the target operational register.
|
|
32
|
+
2. Select appropriate boundary enforcement values from validated enum select sets.
|
|
33
|
+
3. Export standardized artifacts (CSV table, SQL DDL, JSON Schema) to integrate into validation CI pipelines.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Field Reference
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
| # | Field Name | Type | SQL Type | JSON Schema Type | Notion Property Type | Example Value |
|
|
38
|
+
|---|------------|------|----------|------------------|----------------------|---------------|
|
|
39
|
+
| 1 | Token Registry ID | `id` | `SERIAL PRIMARY KEY` | `integer` | Text | `TOK-001` |
|
|
40
|
+
| 2 | Token Symbol | `text` | `VARCHAR(12)` | `string` | Text | `FOX` |
|
|
41
|
+
| 3 | Token Name | `text` | `VARCHAR(64)` | `string` | Text | `GrantFox Utility Token` |
|
|
42
|
+
| 4 | Decimals | `number` | `INTEGER` | `number` | Number | `7` |
|
|
43
|
+
| 5 | Total Supply Cap | `currency` | `NUMERIC(24,7)` | `number` | Number | `10000000.0000000` |
|
|
44
|
+
| 6 | Admin Address | `text` | `VARCHAR(56)` | `string` | Text | `GA7QY...` |
|
|
45
|
+
| 7 | SEP-41 Interface Compliant | `select` | `VARCHAR(16)` | `string` | Select | `Yes` |
|
|
46
|
+
| 8 | Clawback Enabled | `select` | `VARCHAR(16)` | `string` | Select | `No` |
|
|
47
|
+
| 9 | Mint Rate Limit Per Epoch | `number` | `INTEGER` | `number` | Number | `50000` |
|
|
48
|
+
| 10 | Contract Lifecycle State | `select` | `VARCHAR(32)` | `string` | Select | `Active` |
|
|
49
|
+
| 11 | Deployment Timestamp | `date` | `DATE` | `string, format: date` | Date | `2026-10-01` |
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## Select Options
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**SEP-41 Interface Compliant**
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
Yes | No
|
|
57
|
+
```
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
**Clawback Enabled**
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
```
|
|
62
|
+
Yes | No
|
|
63
|
+
```
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
**Contract Lifecycle State**
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
```
|
|
68
|
+
Draft | Testnet Deployed | Audited | Mainnet Live | Paused | Deprecated
|
|
69
|
+
```
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
## Relations
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
- `Audit Reference` -> links to the formal review documentation or test repository.
|
|
74
|
+
- `Target Architecture` -> links to the deployed contract or autonomous agent runtime component.
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
## Examples
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
**Prompt**
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
```
|
|
81
|
+
How do I configure and track Soroban Token Minting Architecture for our production environment?
|
|
82
|
+
```
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
**Recommended Next Step**
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
> Generate the unified field schema, SQL DDL migration, and JSON validation schema to register into your system catalog.
|
|
87
|
+
>
|
|
88
|
+
> Workflow: Define criteria -> Run automated verification -> Record baseline -> Monitor invariants.
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
## Best Practices
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
- Enforce strict typing on numerical bounds and currency amounts; avoid unstructured free-text fields for critical states.
|
|
93
|
+
- Re-run validation test suites on every state-altering commit or parameter change.
|
|
94
|
+
- Keep example data synthetic and isolated from production cryptographic keys or private endpoints.
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
## Limitations
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
- Provides architectural specifications, data models, and verification schemas; does not execute direct transaction signing without authorized external tooling.
|
|
99
|
+
- Requires network connectivity and valid RPC credentials when querying on-chain states.
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
## Security & Safety Notes
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
- All parameters declare `risk: safe`. No unauthorized state modification or privileged credential access is performed.
|
|
104
|
+
- Use synthetic dummy keys and mock addresses in test suites and local verification scripts.
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
- **Problem:** Mismatched decimal precision between contract runtime and database register.
|
|
109
|
+
**Solution:** Always verify decimals using the explicit field mapping in this reference.
|
|
110
|
+
- **Problem:** Missing authorization checks prior to state update.
|
|
111
|
+
**Solution:** Cross-validate against the Security Audit register before deployment.
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
## Related Skills
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
- @soroban-contract-audit - provides the security checklist and vulnerability categorization.
|
|
116
|
+
- @soroban-liquidity-pool - covers AMM invariant and LP-share modelling.
|
|
117
|
+
- @stellar-anchor-integration - covers SEP-10 and SEP-24 anchor compliance flows.
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
## Reusable Prompt
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
```
|
|
122
|
+
I want to establish a verified Soroban Token Minting Architecture register for our production protocol.
|
|
123
|
+
Guide me through the required field parameters and output the corresponding SQL DDL and JSON Schema.
|
|
124
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: stellar-anchor-integration
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Stellar anchor protocol compliance register: SEP-10 web authentication, SEP-24 interactive deposit and withdrawal, and KYC lifecycle.'
|
|
4
|
+
category: engineering
|
|
5
|
+
risk: safe
|
|
6
|
+
source: self
|
|
7
|
+
source_type: self
|
|
8
|
+
date_added: "2026-10-01"
|
|
9
|
+
author: Ranjeet2063
|
|
10
|
+
tags: [stellar, sep-10, sep-24, anchor, on-ramp, off-ramp, fintech]
|
|
11
|
+
tools: []
|
|
12
|
+
source_repo: Ranjeet2063/agentic-awesome-skills
|
|
13
|
+
---
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
# Stellar Anchor Protocol Integration
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
**What it is:** Manages regulatory and technical conformance for Stellar Anchor protocols including SEP-10 challenge signing and SEP-24 interactive fund flows.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Overview
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Provides a standardized, auditable framework and data model for **Stellar Anchor Protocol Integration** operations across distributed engineering and decentralized application systems.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## When to Use This Skill
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- When formalizing architectural contracts, security invariants, or operational limits for Stellar Anchor Protocol Integration.
|
|
26
|
+
- When cross-functional review is required between protocol developers, smart contract auditors, and AI engineering agents.
|
|
27
|
+
- When generating reproducible CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, and Notion property registers for tracking compliance.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## How It Works
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
1. Define the parameters, thresholds, and identity bindings required for the target operational register.
|
|
32
|
+
2. Select appropriate boundary enforcement values from validated enum select sets.
|
|
33
|
+
3. Export standardized artifacts (CSV table, SQL DDL, JSON Schema) to integrate into validation CI pipelines.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Field Reference
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
| # | Field Name | Type | SQL Type | JSON Schema Type | Notion Property Type | Example Value |
|
|
38
|
+
|---|------------|------|----------|------------------|----------------------|---------------|
|
|
39
|
+
| 1 | Anchor Service ID | `id` | `SERIAL PRIMARY KEY` | `integer` | Text | `ANC-001` |
|
|
40
|
+
| 2 | Anchor Domain | `text` | `VARCHAR(128)` | `string` | Text | `anchor.stellar-gateway.org` |
|
|
41
|
+
| 3 | TOML Endpoint Status | `select` | `VARCHAR(32)` | `string` | Select | `Active 200 OK` |
|
|
42
|
+
| 4 | SEP-10 JWT Issuer | `text` | `VARCHAR(56)` | `string` | Text | `GCAUTH...` |
|
|
43
|
+
| 5 | SEP-24 Interactive Deposit Enabled | `select` | `VARCHAR(16)` | `string` | Select | `Yes` |
|
|
44
|
+
| 6 | SEP-38 Quote Server Active | `select` | `VARCHAR(16)` | `string` | Select | `Yes` |
|
|
45
|
+
| 7 | Supported Asset Codes | `text` | `VARCHAR(64)` | `string` | Text | `USDC, EURC, NPRC` |
|
|
46
|
+
| 8 | KYC Compliance Level | `select` | `VARCHAR(32)` | `string` | Select | `Tier 2 Enhanced` |
|
|
47
|
+
| 9 | Webhook Callback Latency Ms | `number` | `INTEGER` | `number` | Number | `120` |
|
|
48
|
+
| 10 | Integration Health | `select` | `VARCHAR(32)` | `string` | Select | `Operational` |
|
|
49
|
+
| 11 | Audit Review Date | `date` | `DATE` | `string, format: date` | Date | `2026-10-01` |
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## Select Options
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**TOML Endpoint Status**
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
Active 200 OK | Degraded | Unreachable
|
|
57
|
+
```
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
**SEP-24 Interactive Deposit Enabled**
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
```
|
|
62
|
+
Yes | No
|
|
63
|
+
```
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
**SEP-38 Quote Server Active**
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
```
|
|
68
|
+
Yes | No
|
|
69
|
+
```
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
**KYC Compliance Level**
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
```
|
|
74
|
+
Tier 0 None | Tier 1 Basic | Tier 2 Enhanced | Corporate Institutional
|
|
75
|
+
```
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
**Integration Health**
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
```
|
|
80
|
+
Operational | Maintenance | Deprecated
|
|
81
|
+
```
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
## Relations
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
- `Audit Reference` -> links to the formal review documentation or test repository.
|
|
86
|
+
- `Target Architecture` -> links to the deployed contract or autonomous agent runtime component.
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
## Examples
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
**Prompt**
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
```
|
|
93
|
+
How do I configure and track Stellar Anchor Protocol Integration for our production environment?
|
|
94
|
+
```
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
**Recommended Next Step**
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
> Generate the unified field schema, SQL DDL migration, and JSON validation schema to register into your system catalog.
|
|
99
|
+
>
|
|
100
|
+
> Workflow: Define criteria -> Run automated verification -> Record baseline -> Monitor invariants.
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
## Best Practices
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
- Enforce strict typing on numerical bounds and currency amounts; avoid unstructured free-text fields for critical states.
|
|
105
|
+
- Re-run validation test suites on every state-altering commit or parameter change.
|
|
106
|
+
- Keep example data synthetic and isolated from production cryptographic keys or private endpoints.
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
## Limitations
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
- Provides architectural specifications, data models, and verification schemas; does not execute direct transaction signing without authorized external tooling.
|
|
111
|
+
- Requires network connectivity and valid RPC credentials when querying on-chain states.
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
## Security & Safety Notes
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
- All parameters declare `risk: safe`. No unauthorized state modification or privileged credential access is performed.
|
|
116
|
+
- Use synthetic dummy keys and mock addresses in test suites and local verification scripts.
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
- **Problem:** Mismatched decimal precision between contract runtime and database register.
|
|
121
|
+
**Solution:** Always verify decimals using the explicit field mapping in this reference.
|
|
122
|
+
- **Problem:** Missing authorization checks prior to state update.
|
|
123
|
+
**Solution:** Cross-validate against the Security Audit register before deployment.
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
## Related Skills
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
- @stellar-escrow-timelock - covers conditional escrow and timelock settlement.
|
|
128
|
+
- @soroban-token-minter - covers SEP-41 token supply, admin and event modelling.
|
|
129
|
+
- @cross-chain-relayer-audit - covers message hashes, nonces and quorum proofs.
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
## Reusable Prompt
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
```
|
|
134
|
+
I want to establish a verified Stellar Anchor Protocol Integration register for our production protocol.
|
|
135
|
+
Guide me through the required field parameters and output the corresponding SQL DDL and JSON Schema.
|
|
136
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: stellar-asset-clawback-compliance
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Regulated Stellar asset clawback architecture register: issuer authorization flags, claimable balance revocations, and regulatory audit trail.'
|
|
4
|
+
category: engineering
|
|
5
|
+
risk: safe
|
|
6
|
+
source: self
|
|
7
|
+
source_type: self
|
|
8
|
+
date_added: "2026-10-01"
|
|
9
|
+
author: Ranjeet2063
|
|
10
|
+
tags: [stellar, clawback, compliance, fintech, regtech, security]
|
|
11
|
+
tools: []
|
|
12
|
+
source_repo: Ranjeet2063/agentic-awesome-skills
|
|
13
|
+
---
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
# Stellar Asset Clawback Compliance
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
**What it is:** Provides an immutable compliance record and operational audit register for executing regulatory clawbacks on CAP-35 compliant Stellar assets.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Overview
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Provides a standardized, auditable framework and data model for **Stellar Asset Clawback Compliance** operations across distributed engineering and decentralized application systems.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## When to Use This Skill
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- When formalizing architectural contracts, security invariants, or operational limits for Stellar Asset Clawback Compliance.
|
|
26
|
+
- When cross-functional review is required between protocol developers, smart contract auditors, and AI engineering agents.
|
|
27
|
+
- When generating reproducible CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, and Notion property registers for tracking compliance.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## How It Works
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
1. Define the parameters, thresholds, and identity bindings required for the target operational register.
|
|
32
|
+
2. Select appropriate boundary enforcement values from validated enum select sets.
|
|
33
|
+
3. Export standardized artifacts (CSV table, SQL DDL, JSON Schema) to integrate into validation CI pipelines.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Field Reference
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
| # | Field Name | Type | SQL Type | JSON Schema Type | Notion Property Type | Example Value |
|
|
38
|
+
|---|------------|------|----------|------------------|----------------------|---------------|
|
|
39
|
+
| 1 | Clawback Case ID | `id` | `SERIAL PRIMARY KEY` | `integer` | Text | `CLAW-001` |
|
|
40
|
+
| 2 | Asset Code | `text` | `VARCHAR(12)` | `string` | Text | `USDC` |
|
|
41
|
+
| 3 | Issuer Account ID | `text` | `VARCHAR(56)` | `string` | Text | `GISS...` |
|
|
42
|
+
| 4 | Target Account ID | `text` | `VARCHAR(56)` | `string` | Text | `GTGT...` |
|
|
43
|
+
| 5 | Clawback Amount | `currency` | `NUMERIC(24,7)` | `number` | Number | `5000.0000000` |
|
|
44
|
+
| 6 | Clawback Enabled Flag Verified | `select` | `VARCHAR(16)` | `string` | Select | `Yes` |
|
|
45
|
+
| 7 | Legal Regulatory Reference | `text` | `VARCHAR(128)` | `string` | Text | `COURT-ORD-2026-0914` |
|
|
46
|
+
| 8 | Clawback Claimable Balance ID | `text` | `VARCHAR(64)` | `string` | Text | `00000000...` |
|
|
47
|
+
| 9 | Action Execution State | `select` | `VARCHAR(32)` | `string` | Select | `Executed Confirmed` |
|
|
48
|
+
| 10 | Compliance Officer Signoff | `text` | `VARCHAR(64)` | `string` | Text | `Ranjeet Kumar Sah` |
|
|
49
|
+
| 11 | Execution Timestamp | `date` | `DATE` | `string, format: date` | Date | `2026-10-01` |
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## Select Options
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**Clawback Enabled Flag Verified**
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
Yes | No
|
|
57
|
+
```
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
**Action Execution State**
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
```
|
|
62
|
+
Initiated Review | Executed Confirmed | Rejected Invalid | Reverted
|
|
63
|
+
```
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
## Relations
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
- `Audit Reference` -> links to the formal review documentation or test repository.
|
|
68
|
+
- `Target Architecture` -> links to the deployed contract or autonomous agent runtime component.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Examples
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
**Prompt**
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
```
|
|
75
|
+
How do I configure and track Stellar Asset Clawback Compliance for our production environment?
|
|
76
|
+
```
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
**Recommended Next Step**
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
> Generate the unified field schema, SQL DDL migration, and JSON validation schema to register into your system catalog.
|
|
81
|
+
>
|
|
82
|
+
> Workflow: Define criteria -> Run automated verification -> Record baseline -> Monitor invariants.
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
## Best Practices
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
- Enforce strict typing on numerical bounds and currency amounts; avoid unstructured free-text fields for critical states.
|
|
87
|
+
- Re-run validation test suites on every state-altering commit or parameter change.
|
|
88
|
+
- Keep example data synthetic and isolated from production cryptographic keys or private endpoints.
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
## Limitations
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
- Provides architectural specifications, data models, and verification schemas; does not execute direct transaction signing without authorized external tooling.
|
|
93
|
+
- Requires network connectivity and valid RPC credentials when querying on-chain states.
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
## Security & Safety Notes
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
- All parameters declare `risk: safe`. No unauthorized state modification or privileged credential access is performed.
|
|
98
|
+
- Use synthetic dummy keys and mock addresses in test suites and local verification scripts.
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
- **Problem:** Mismatched decimal precision between contract runtime and database register.
|
|
103
|
+
**Solution:** Always verify decimals using the explicit field mapping in this reference.
|
|
104
|
+
- **Problem:** Missing authorization checks prior to state update.
|
|
105
|
+
**Solution:** Cross-validate against the Security Audit register before deployment.
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
## Related Skills
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
- @stellar-anchor-integration - covers SEP-10 and SEP-24 anchor compliance flows.
|
|
110
|
+
- @stellar-multisig-threshold-coordinator - covers signer weights and threshold coordination.
|
|
111
|
+
- @soroban-contract-audit - provides the security checklist and vulnerability categorization.
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
## Reusable Prompt
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
```
|
|
116
|
+
I want to establish a verified Stellar Asset Clawback Compliance register for our production protocol.
|
|
117
|
+
Guide me through the required field parameters and output the corresponding SQL DDL and JSON Schema.
|
|
118
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: stellar-escrow-timelock
|
|
3
|
+
description: 'Decentralized conditional escrow and timelock contract register: multi-signature release conditions, clawback expiry, and settlement triggers.'
|
|
4
|
+
category: engineering
|
|
5
|
+
risk: safe
|
|
6
|
+
source: self
|
|
7
|
+
source_type: self
|
|
8
|
+
date_added: "2026-10-01"
|
|
9
|
+
author: Ranjeet2063
|
|
10
|
+
tags: [stellar, escrow, timelock, soroban, multisig, settlement]
|
|
11
|
+
tools: []
|
|
12
|
+
source_repo: Ranjeet2063/agentic-awesome-skills
|
|
13
|
+
---
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
# Stellar Escrow and Timelock Architecture
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
**What it is:** Provides an auditable framework for conditional asset locking, timelock boundary verifications, and multi-signature release triggers on Stellar.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Overview
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Provides a standardized, auditable framework and data model for **Stellar Escrow and Timelock Architecture** operations across distributed engineering and decentralized application systems.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## When to Use This Skill
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- When formalizing architectural contracts, security invariants, or operational limits for Stellar Escrow and Timelock Architecture.
|
|
26
|
+
- When cross-functional review is required between protocol developers, smart contract auditors, and AI engineering agents.
|
|
27
|
+
- When generating reproducible CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, and Notion property registers for tracking compliance.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## How It Works
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
1. Define the parameters, thresholds, and identity bindings required for the target operational register.
|
|
32
|
+
2. Select appropriate boundary enforcement values from validated enum select sets.
|
|
33
|
+
3. Export standardized artifacts (CSV table, SQL DDL, JSON Schema) to integrate into validation CI pipelines.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Field Reference
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
| # | Field Name | Type | SQL Type | JSON Schema Type | Notion Property Type | Example Value |
|
|
38
|
+
|---|------------|------|----------|------------------|----------------------|---------------|
|
|
39
|
+
| 1 | Escrow Agreement ID | `id` | `SERIAL PRIMARY KEY` | `integer` | Text | `ESC-001` |
|
|
40
|
+
| 2 | Depositor Account | `text` | `VARCHAR(56)` | `string` | Text | `GDEP...` |
|
|
41
|
+
| 3 | Beneficiary Account | `text` | `VARCHAR(56)` | `string` | Text | `GBEN...` |
|
|
42
|
+
| 4 | Arbitrator Account | `text` | `VARCHAR(56)` | `string` | Text | `GARB...` |
|
|
43
|
+
| 5 | Locked Asset Code | `text` | `VARCHAR(12)` | `string` | Text | `USDC` |
|
|
44
|
+
| 6 | Locked Principal Amount | `currency` | `NUMERIC(24,7)` | `number` | Number | `15000.0000000` |
|
|
45
|
+
| 7 | Unlock Timestamp Epoch | `number` | `BIGINT` | `number` | Number | `1790800000` |
|
|
46
|
+
| 8 | Dispute Resolution Pathway | `select` | `VARCHAR(64)` | `string` | Select | `2-of-3 Multi-Sig` |
|
|
47
|
+
| 9 | Clawback Grace Period Days | `number` | `INTEGER` | `number` | Number | `14` |
|
|
48
|
+
| 10 | Settlement Status | `select` | `VARCHAR(32)` | `string` | Select | `Locked in Escrow` |
|
|
49
|
+
| 11 | Creation Date | `date` | `DATE` | `string, format: date` | Date | `2026-10-01` |
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## Select Options
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**Dispute Resolution Pathway**
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
2-of-3 Multi-Sig | Automated Time Expiry | Arbitrator Sole Ruling
|
|
57
|
+
```
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
**Settlement Status**
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
```
|
|
62
|
+
Pending Deposit | Locked in Escrow | In Dispute | Released | Refunded
|
|
63
|
+
```
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
## Relations
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
- `Audit Reference` -> links to the formal review documentation or test repository.
|
|
68
|
+
- `Target Architecture` -> links to the deployed contract or autonomous agent runtime component.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Examples
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
**Prompt**
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
```
|
|
75
|
+
How do I configure and track Stellar Escrow and Timelock Architecture for our production environment?
|
|
76
|
+
```
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
**Recommended Next Step**
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
> Generate the unified field schema, SQL DDL migration, and JSON validation schema to register into your system catalog.
|
|
81
|
+
>
|
|
82
|
+
> Workflow: Define criteria -> Run automated verification -> Record baseline -> Monitor invariants.
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
## Best Practices
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
- Enforce strict typing on numerical bounds and currency amounts; avoid unstructured free-text fields for critical states.
|
|
87
|
+
- Re-run validation test suites on every state-altering commit or parameter change.
|
|
88
|
+
- Keep example data synthetic and isolated from production cryptographic keys or private endpoints.
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
## Limitations
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
- Provides architectural specifications, data models, and verification schemas; does not execute direct transaction signing without authorized external tooling.
|
|
93
|
+
- Requires network connectivity and valid RPC credentials when querying on-chain states.
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
## Security & Safety Notes
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
- All parameters declare `risk: safe`. No unauthorized state modification or privileged credential access is performed.
|
|
98
|
+
- Use synthetic dummy keys and mock addresses in test suites and local verification scripts.
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
- **Problem:** Mismatched decimal precision between contract runtime and database register.
|
|
103
|
+
**Solution:** Always verify decimals using the explicit field mapping in this reference.
|
|
104
|
+
- **Problem:** Missing authorization checks prior to state update.
|
|
105
|
+
**Solution:** Cross-validate against the Security Audit register before deployment.
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
## Related Skills
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
- @stellar-anchor-integration - covers SEP-10 and SEP-24 anchor compliance flows.
|
|
110
|
+
- @soroban-contract-audit - provides the security checklist and vulnerability categorization.
|
|
111
|
+
- @cross-chain-relayer-audit - covers message hashes, nonces and quorum proofs.
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
## Reusable Prompt
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
```
|
|
116
|
+
I want to establish a verified Stellar Escrow and Timelock Architecture register for our production protocol.
|
|
117
|
+
Guide me through the required field parameters and output the corresponding SQL DDL and JSON Schema.
|
|
118
|
+
```
|