opencode-skills-collection 2.0.69 → 2.0.71

package/bundled-skills/axiom/references/assumption-types.md

@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+# Assumption Type Handbook / 假设分类手册
+
+A detailed reference for the 4-type assumption classification system used in Axiom Phase 3. This handbook provides identification methods, challenge strategies, real-world examples, and edge-case guidance in both Chinese and English.
+
+---
+
+## Why Classification Matters / 为什么分类本身就是洞见
+
+Most first-principles tools skip classification and jump straight to "question everything." But **different types of assumptions require fundamentally different challenge strategies**:
+
+- Questioning a **physical fact** wastes time and credibility
+- Questioning a **convention** requires checking if the environment has changed
+- Questioning a **belief** requires finding whose experience shaped it
+- Questioning an **interest-driven** assumption requires following the money
+
+**The biggest "aha" moment** often comes when someone discovers that what they treated as an unchangeable fact is actually just a convention — or even an interest-driven narrative.
+
+> 很多人第一次做分类时会震惊地发现：他们一直当成"事实"的东西，其实只是"惯例"，甚至是"利益驱动"。
+
+---
+
+## The 4 Types in Detail / 四种假设类型详解
+
+---
+
+### 🔵 Type 1: Physical Fact / 物理事实
+
+**Definition / 定义:**
+Laws of nature, mathematical truths, verified scientific constants, and logical tautologies. These cannot be changed by human will, policy, or belief.
+
+自然规律、数学定理、已验证的科学常数、逻辑恒等式。不能被人类意志、政策或信念改变。
+
+**Identification Questions / 识别问题:**
+- Can you find a single genuine counterexample anywhere on Earth? / 你能在地球上找到一个真正的反例吗？
+- Is this universally true regardless of culture, time, or context? / 这在所有文化、时间、语境下都成立吗？
+- Would this still be true if every human disappeared? / 如果人类消失了，这还成立吗？
+- Is this based on repeatable, measurable evidence? / 这是否基于可重复、可测量的证据？
+
+**Challenge Strategy / 质疑策略:**
+**Accept it. Do not waste energy.** If something is genuinely a physical fact, the correct response is to work within its constraints, not against them.
+
+接受它。不要浪费精力质疑引力。如果确实是物理事实，正确的做法是在它的约束内工作。
+
+**Examples / 示例:**
+
+| ✅ Genuine Physical Facts | ❌ Often Misclassified As Facts |
+|---------------------------|-------------------------------|
+| Gravity exists (9.8 m/s²) | "Housing always appreciates" (convention) |
+| Entropy increases over time | "You need 8 hours of sleep" (convention — varies by person) |
+| Speed of light is constant | "People are rational economic actors" (belief) |
+| Compound interest formula | "Innovation requires disruption" (interest-driven) |
+
+**Common Misclassification Trap:**
+People often classify **social patterns** or **statistical trends** as physical facts. "The economy always recovers" is a historical pattern, not a law of physics. "People resist change" is a tendency, not a constant.
+
+> ⚠️ 常见误分类：把**社会规律**或**统计趋势**当成物理事实。"经济总会复苏"是历史规律，不是物理定律。
+
+---
+
+### 🟡 Type 2: Historical Convention / 历史惯例
+
+**Definition / 定义:**
+Practices, rules, or beliefs that were once valid and widely adopted but originated in a specific context. The context may have changed, making the convention obsolete or optional.
+
+曾经有效且被广泛采用的做法、规则或信念，但起源于特定语境。语境可能已经改变，使惯例过时或可选。
+
+**Identification Questions / 识别问题:**
+- When did this rule/practice originate? What was the world like then? / 这个规则/做法是什么时候起源的？那时的环境是什么样的？
+- Has the underlying environment (technology, demographics, market, regulation) changed significantly since then? / 底层环境变了吗？
+- Is this universal, or specific to a region/industry/era? / 这是普遍的，还是特定于某个地区/行业/时代？
+- Who benefits from this convention continuing? / 谁因为这个惯例的延续而获益？
+- What percentage of people who follow this convention actually get the promised result? / 遵循这个惯例的人中，多少比例真正得到了承诺的结果？
+
+**Challenge Strategy / 质疑策略:**
+**Check the timestamp.** Ask: "Was this true 20 years ago? Is it still true now? Will it be true in 10 years?" The key insight is that conventions carry enormous inertia — people follow them long after the original reason has disappeared.
+
+检查时间戳。问："这在20年前成立吗？现在还成立吗？10年后呢？"关键洞见：惯例有巨大的惯性 — 人们在原始理由消失后很久仍然遵循它们。
+
+**Examples / 示例:**
+
+| Convention | Original Context | Changed Context |
+|-----------|------------------|-----------------|
+| 大学学历是好工作的门票 | 1990s: 大学生稀缺 | 2020s: 本科普及，技能导向增强 |
+| "You must be in the office to be productive" | Pre-2020: Limited remote tools | Post-COVID: Remote infrastructure mature |
+| 在一家公司待 5-10 年才算忠诚 | Lifetime employment era | Average tenure is now 2-3 years |
+| "Real estate is the best investment for the middle class" | 1980-2010: Population growth + urbanization | 2020s+: Demographic decline in many countries |
+| 创业要写完整的商业计划书 | Before Lean Startup methodology | Now: MVP → iterate → pivot is standard |
+| "Get a STEM degree for job security" | Pre-AI era | AI is now disrupting STEM roles too |
+
+**Cross-Cultural Note / 跨文化注意:**
+Some conventions are deeply culture-specific:
+- 🇨🇳 "35岁是职业分水岭" — This is a Chinese labor market convention, virtually unknown in the West
+- 🇺🇸 "You should change jobs every 2-3 years" — This is an American tech industry convention, unusual in Japan or Germany
+- 🇨🇳 "有房才能结婚" — Chinese marriage convention, not a global reality
+- 🇺🇸 "Follow your passion" — American cultural narrative, less common in collectivist cultures
+
+> 有些惯例是文化特有的。"35岁危机"几乎只存在于中国劳动力市场。"Follow your passion"主要是美国文化叙事。
+
+---
+
+### 🔴 Type 3: Subjective Belief / 主观信念
+
+**Definition / 定义:**
+Conclusions drawn from personal experience, projected as general truths. The person genuinely believes them, but they are shaped by a narrow sample of experiences, cognitive biases, and emotional associations.
+
+从个人经验中得出的结论，被投射为普遍真理。当事人真诚地相信它们，但它们是由有限的经验样本、认知偏差和情感联想塑造的。
+
+**Identification Questions / 识别问题:**
+- Who told you this? / 谁告诉你的？
+- Have you personally verified this, or are you extrapolating from a small sample? / 你亲自验证过吗，还是从小样本推断？
+- Could someone with different experiences reach the opposite conclusion? / 有不同经历的人能得出相反结论吗？
+- Is this belief comfortable? Does it protect you from a harder truth? / 这个信念让你舒服吗？它是否保护你免受更难以面对的真相？
+- If you discovered this belief was wrong, what would you have to do differently? / 如果发现这个信念是错的，你必须做出什么改变？
+
+**Challenge Strategy / 质疑策略:**
+**Seek counter-evidence.** Find people who did the opposite and succeeded, or people who followed this belief and failed. The goal isn't to disprove the belief, but to test its universality.
+
+寻找反面证据。找到做了相反事情却成功的人，或遵循这个信念却失败的人。目标不是推翻信念，而是检验它的普遍性。
+
+**Examples / 示例:**
+
+| Subjective Belief | What It Actually Is |
+|-------------------|---------------------|
+| "我不适合做管理" | One bad management experience → generalized to identity |
+| "I'm not a math person" | Early negative experience → self-limiting identity |
+| "创业太冒险了" | Heard failure stories → availability bias |
+| "My industry doesn't value X" | Based on one company's culture, not the industry |
+| "我的性格不适合社交" | Introversion ≠ inability to build relationships |
+| "Good developers don't need to be good at communication" | Belief that protects from discomfort |
+
+**Red Flag — Belief Disguised As Fact:**
+If someone says "That's just how it is" or "Everyone knows that" about something that isn't a physical law, it's almost certainly a belief or convention that has been promoted to "fact" status in their mind.
+
+> 🚩 如果有人说"就是这样的"或"大家都知道"，但说的不是物理定律，那几乎肯定是信念或惯例被提升成了"事实"。
+
+---
+
+### ⚫ Type 4: Interest-Driven / 利益驱动
+
+**Definition / 定义:**
+Assumptions that someone (an industry, company, influencer, or social group) actively propagates because they benefit from you believing them. This doesn't mean the claim is always false — but its truth is incidental to why it's being promoted.
+
+某些人（行业、公司、意见领袖或社会群体）积极传播的假设，因为他们从你的相信中获益。这并不意味着这些说法总是假的 — 但它们被传播的原因不是因为真，而是因为有利可图。
+
+**Identification Questions / 识别问题:**
+- Who is promoting this idea? What do they sell? / 谁在推广这个观点？他们卖什么？
+- Does the source of this information have a financial incentive for you to believe it? / 这个信息来源是否有经济动机让你相信？
+- Would this idea still be popular if no one profited from it? / 如果没有人从中获利，这个观点还会流行吗？
+- Is this framed as urgent? Urgency often serves the seller. / 这是否被包装成紧迫的？紧迫感通常服务于卖方。
+- What's the null hypothesis — what happens if you do nothing? / 零假设是什么 — 如果你什么都不做会怎样？
+
+**Challenge Strategy / 质疑策略:**
+**Follow the money.** Trace the incentive chain from the idea back to whoever benefits. This doesn't automatically disprove the claim, but it changes how much weight you should give it.
+
+追踪金钱链。从这个观点追溯到获益者。这并不自动推翻这个说法，但它改变了你应该给予它的权重。
+
+**Examples / 示例:**
+
+| Interest-Driven Assumption | Who Benefits |
+|---------------------------|-------------|
+| "你需要买保险来保护家人" | 保险公司和保险经纪人 |
+| "AI will replace all jobs in 5 years" | AI companies raising funding |
+| "创业是实现财务自由的唯一方式" | 创业培训课程、孵化器 |
+| "You need to learn to code" (2015-2023) | Coding bootcamps, tech companies |
+| "房价永远涨" | 房地产开发商、中介、银行 |
+| "You need this certification to be competitive" | Certification providers |
+| "知识付费是最好的自我投资" | 知识付费平台和课程制作者 |
+| "Growth hacking is essential for startups" | Growth consultancies, SaaS tools |
+
+**Cross-Cultural Note:**
+- 🇨🇳 Chinese internet is saturated with interest-driven assumptions from: 知识付费 platforms, 房产中介, 保险销售, 创业导师, 消费主义 KOL
+- 🇺🇸 American media is saturated with: VC-backed startup mythology, credentialism pushed by universities, lifestyle inflation pushed by advertising
+
+> 中国互联网充满了知识付费、房产中介、保险销售的利益驱动假设。美国媒体充满了 VC 支持的创业神话和大学推动的学历主义。
+
+---
+
+## Handling Mixed Types / 处理混合类型
+
+Many real-world assumptions are **hybrids**. When you encounter one:
+
+1. **Identify the primary type** — which type best describes the core mechanism?
+2. **Note the secondary type** — what additional dynamics are at play?
+3. **Apply the primary challenge strategy first**, then supplement with secondary
+
+**Examples of Mixed Types / 混合类型示例:**
+
+| Assumption | Primary | Secondary | Why |
+|-----------|---------|-----------|-----|
+| "现在是创业的好时机" | 🟡 Convention | ⚫ Interest-driven | The "good timing" narrative is a convention, but startup media amplifies it for clicks and funding |
+| "A college degree pays for itself" | 🟡 Convention | ⚫ Interest-driven | Was true statistically, but universities have incentive to promote it regardless |
+| "房价只涨不跌" | 🔴 Belief | 🟡 Convention | Personal experience from a specific era, reinforced by industry-wide convention |
+| "Remote workers are less productive" | 🔴 Belief | 🟡 Convention | Manager's personal bias, reinforced by traditional management convention |
+
+---
+
+## Edge Cases / 边界案例指南
+
+### Statistical Trends vs Facts
+"Men are taller than women on average" — This is a **statistical fact** (measurable, repeatable), but applying it to any individual is a **subjective belief**. Classify the assumption based on how the user is using it.
+
+### Outdated Facts
+"Pluto is a planet" — Was a physical fact, reclassified. If someone's assumption is based on an outdated fact, treat it as a **convention** that hasn't been updated.
+
+### Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
+"The stock market will crash" — If enough people believe this, they sell, and it crashes. Classify as **interest-driven** if the source benefits from the prediction, or **subjective belief** if it's the user's personal anxiety.
+
+### Cultural Norms
+"你应该30岁之前结婚" — This is a **convention** (culturally specific, has a historical basis), with potential **interest-driven** elements (family pressure, wedding industry).
+
+---
+
+## Quick Reference Card / 快速参考卡
+
+```
+🔵 PHYSICAL FACT     → Can you find ANY counterexample? → No  → Accept it
+🟡 HISTORICAL CONV.  → When did this rule form?         → Check if context changed
+🔴 SUBJECTIVE BELIEF → Who told you this?               → Seek counter-evidence
+⚫ INTEREST-DRIVEN   → Who profits from this?           → Follow the money
+```
+
+```
+🔵 物理事实  → 能找到反例吗？       → 不能 → 接受
+🟡 历史惯例  → 这个规则什么时候形成的？ → 检查环境是否已变
+🔴 主观信念  → 谁告诉你的？          → 寻找反面证据
+⚫ 利益驱动  → 谁因此获利？          → 追踪利益链
+```

package/bundled-skills/axiom/references/scenarios.md

@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
+# Scenario-Specific Assumption Mining Checklists / 场景专用假设挖掘清单
+
+This file provides structured mining checklists for 8 common scenario types (4 Chinese-native + 4 English-native). Each checklist contains **high-frequency hidden assumptions** that people in those situations almost never question, plus tailored probing questions to surface them.
+
+When a user's question matches a scenario type, use the corresponding checklist to ensure your Phase 2 (Assumption Mining) is thorough and culturally relevant.
+
+---
+
+## 🇨🇳 中文场景
+
+---
+
+### 场景一：职业决策（换工作、转行、升职、创业）
+
+**高频隐藏假设清单：**
+
+1. 大公司比小公司更稳定、更安全
+2. 跳槽一定能涨薪 20% 以上
+3. 我的技能在市场上是稀缺的 / 有竞争力的
+4. 35 岁是职业发展的分水岭
+5. 管理岗比技术岗的天花板更高
+6. 行业经验比通用能力更重要
+7. 现在的不满会在换了环境之后消失
+8. 大厂背景（字节/腾讯/阿里）是职业加速器
+9. 远程工作会影响职业发展
+10. 学历（985/211/硕士）对职业发展至关重要
+11. 做自己喜欢的事就不会觉得累
+12. 在一个公司待太久会"贬值"
+13. 只要够努力，什么行业都能做好
+14. 我的上级/领导对我的评价是客观的
+15. 体制内一定比体制外稳定
+
+**推荐挖掘问题：**
+- "你说想换工作 — 如果当前公司环境改善 50%，你还想走吗？"
+- "你认为自己的核心竞争力是什么？你的同事/猎头也这么认为吗？"
+- "你说35岁是门槛 — 你认识几个35岁以上转型成功的案例？"
+- "你想进大厂 — 你了解大厂同级别的实际日常工作状态吗？"
+- "你说现在是好时机 — 好时机的判断依据是什么？是数据还是感觉？"
+
+---
+
+### 场景二：产品方向验证（创业、新功能、业务转型）
+
+**高频隐藏假设清单：**
+
+1. 用户说他们需要这个功能 = 他们会为此付费
+2. 市场足够大（TAM 看起来很大）
+3. 我们能比竞品做得更好
+4. 技术壁垒足够高，竞争者不容易模仿
+5. 只要产品好，营销不是问题
+6. 增长会随着时间自然发生
+7. 我们团队有能力执行这个方向
+8. 客户的反馈 = 市场需求
+9. 先入者有优势 / 我们动作要快
+10. 融资之后就能解决增长问题
+11. 用户留存率会随着产品完善而提升
+12. 这个赛道还没有真正的竞争者
+13. 我们的目标用户和我们自己的画像相似
+14. 小范围验证的成功可以直接放大
+
+**推荐挖掘问题：**
+- "你说用户需要这个 — 有多少人实际掏了钱？愿望和付费之间差距有多大？"
+- "你说市场很大 — 你的可触达市场（SAM）是多少？你能触达的渠道是什么？"
+- "你说你们能做得更好 — '更好'具体是什么维度？用户真的在乎这个维度吗？"
+- "你说要快速行动 — 在这个领域，速度真的比深度重要吗？"
+- "你的竞品分析里，有没有包括'用户目前的替代方案'（包括 Excel 和不作为）？"
+
+---
+
+### 场景三：消费选择（买房、投资、重大消费）
+
+**高频隐藏假设清单：**
+
+1. 房价长期来看一定会涨
+2. 学区房是刚需，不买孩子就输在起跑线
+3. 租房是"帮别人还房贷"，买房才是资产
+4. 保险是必须的 / 买越多越好
+5. 存钱比投资更安全
+6. 黄金/房产是最好的抗通胀资产
+7. 大品牌一定质量更好
+8. 越贵的东西越保值
+9. 投资要分散，鸡蛋不放一个篮子
+10. 提前还贷一定比投资划算
+11. 有车/有房才算"安顿下来"
+12. 消费升级是生活品质提高的标志
+13. 早买早享受，晚买有折扣但错过了使用时间
+
+**推荐挖掘问题：**
+- "你说房价会涨 — 你参考的是过去20年的数据。未来20年的人口结构和经济增速一样吗？"
+- "你说学区房是刚需 — '孩子教育'具体需要学区房解决什么问题？有没有替代方案？"
+- "你说租房不值 — 你算过同地段租房+投资差额 vs 买房+还贷的 30 年总成本吗？"
+- "这笔消费给你的满足感预计能持续多久？"
+- "如果你不做这笔消费，你最担心什么？这个担心是真实风险还是社会压力？"
+
+---
+
+### 场景四：认知信念质疑（人生观、价值观、方法论）
+
+**高频隐藏假设清单：**
+
+1. 努力一定有回报（方向不对的努力呢？）
+2. 年轻就该拼，老了才享受
+3. 稳定才是最重要的
+4. 读书/学历改变命运
+5. 社交人脉 = 个人实力的外延
+6. 时间管理 = 效率提升（忙和有效是两回事）
+7. 情绪化是不成熟的表现
+8. 成功人士的方法论可以复制
+9. 坚持就对了（沉没成本？）
+10. 先苦后甜 / 延迟满足一定更好
+11. 别人的评价是衡量自身价值的重要指标
+12. 选择比努力重要（但选择能力也是通过努力培养的）
+13. 信息越多决策越好
+14. 理性决策一定优于直觉
+
+**推荐挖掘问题：**
+- "你说努力一定有回报 — 你指的是哪种努力？你怎么定义'回报'？"
+- "你说稳定最重要 — 稳定的成本是什么？你放弃了什么来换取稳定？"
+- "你说要延迟满足 — 延迟到什么时候？你怎么知道那个未来一定更好？"
+- "你说信息越多决策越好 — 你最近哪次重大决策是因为信息太多而犹豫不决的？"
+- "你从谁那里学到这个信念的？他们当时的处境和你现在一样吗？"
+
+---
+
+## 🇺🇸 English Scenarios
+
+---
+
+### Scenario 5: Career Decisions (Job Change, Career Pivot, Promotion)
+
+**High-Frequency Hidden Assumptions:**
+
+1. A bigger company is always safer and more stable
+2. I need an MBA / advanced degree to advance to leadership
+3. Remote work will hurt my career progression
+4. I'm too old to switch industries (the "ageism" assumption)
+5. My current skills are highly transferable to any industry
+6. Higher pay = better career move
+7. I need to "pay my dues" before I can lead
+8. The job market is either "hot" or "cold" — binary thinking
+9. My manager's opinion reflects the company's opinion of me
+10. Staying at one company too long looks bad on a resume
+11. I should follow my passion and the money will follow
+12. A title promotion equals real career growth
+13. Networking is the most important career skill
+14. I need to have a 5-year plan
+
+**Recommended Probing Questions:**
+- "You say you want to switch jobs — if your current role improved 50%, would you still leave?"
+- "You say you're too old — how many people in your target industry are your age or older?"
+- "You say remote work hurts career growth — what evidence do you have beyond anecdotes?"
+- "You say higher pay is better — what's the total compensation including work-life balance, learning, and stress?"
+- "Who told you that you need an MBA? Do they have one? Did it work for them the way they claim?"
+
+---
+
+### Scenario 6: Business & Product Validation (Startup, New Feature, Pivot)
+
+**High-Frequency Hidden Assumptions:**
+
+1. If we build it, they will come
+2. The TAM (Total Addressable Market) is $X billion — therefore we'll get a slice
+3. We have a first-mover advantage
+4. Our technology is our moat
+5. Users will switch from their current solution because ours is "better"
+6. A successful MVP means the product will scale
+7. Our target user profile matches our own profile
+8. Competitor analysis = looking at direct competitors only (ignoring spreadsheets, email, or doing nothing)
+9. Growth will come organically once the product is ready
+10. Venture funding will solve our growth problem
+11. Customer interviews = validated demand
+12. B2B sales cycles are predictable and repeatable
+13. We can outexecute the incumbents because we're more agile
+14. Monthly active users = product-market fit
+
+**Recommended Probing Questions:**
+- "You say users need this — how many have actually paid? Wishing and paying are very different."
+- "You say the market is huge — what's your SAM? What channels can you actually reach?"
+- "You say you have a moat — can a well-funded competitor replicate it in 6 months?"
+- "You say you validated with an MVP — how many users stayed after 3 months?"
+- "Your competitor analysis includes 'doing nothing' as an alternative, right?"
+
+---
+
+### Scenario 7: Financial & Life Decisions (Property, Investing, Major Purchases)
+
+**High-Frequency Hidden Assumptions:**
+
+1. Real estate always appreciates in the long run
+2. Renting is "throwing money away"
+3. Diversification eliminates risk
+4. I need $X million to retire comfortably
+5. Index funds are always the safest long-term investment
+6. Buying a house is a better investment than renting + investing the difference
+7. Student loans are always "good debt"
+8. I should maximize my 401k/pension before doing anything else
+9. Insurance is always worth the premium
+10. Early retirement = success
+11. A financial advisor always has my best interests in mind
+12. More expensive = better quality (cars, education, healthcare)
+13. Debt is always bad
+14. I need to own assets to build wealth
+
+**Recommended Probing Questions:**
+- "You say real estate always goes up — are you using 1980-2020 data? What about Japan 1990-2020?"
+- "You say renting is wasting money — have you calculated rent + invest vs buy + mortgage over 30 years?"
+- "You say you need $X to retire — how did you arrive at that number? What lifestyle does it assume?"
+- "You say index funds are safest — safest compared to what? Over what time horizon?"
+- "Your financial advisor — do they earn commissions on the products they recommend?"
+
+---
+
+### Scenario 8: Belief & Worldview Audit (Values, Methodology, Life Philosophy)
+
+**High-Frequency Hidden Assumptions:**
+
+1. Hard work always pays off (what about direction?)
+2. Follow your passion and you'll never work a day (survivorship bias?)
+3. Failure is always the best teacher (only if you extract the right lesson)
+4. More data = better decisions (analysis paralysis is real)
+5. Rational thinking is always superior to intuition
+6. Success is primarily about talent/intelligence
+7. Consistency beats intensity (in what contexts?)
+8. You should always play to your strengths (what about critical weaknesses?)
+9. The best time to start was yesterday (urgency bias)
+10. Compounding effects mean small habits always work (linear vs threshold effects)
+11. Being busy = being productive
+12. Feedback from others is essential for growth (which others? what kind of feedback?)
+13. You can learn anything with enough time
+14. Meritocracy exists — the best work gets recognized
+
+**Recommended Probing Questions:**
+- "You say hard work pays off — in what domains? Can you name a case where hard work in the wrong direction made things worse?"
+- "You say follow your passion — how many people do you know who followed their passion and failed? How would you know?"
+- "You say more data is better — when was the last time you delayed a decision because you had too much data?"
+- "You say the best time to start was yesterday — what if starting too early, before you're ready, actually increases failure risk?"
+- "Where did you learn this belief? What was the context? Does that context match yours?"
+
+---
+
+## How to Use These Checklists / 使用方法
+
+1. **Identify the scenario type** from the user's question
+2. **Use the checklist as a mining guide** — not all assumptions will apply to every user, but scan through them systematically
+3. **Prioritize culturally-specific assumptions** — a Chinese user asking about career decisions will have very different hidden assumptions than an American user
+4. **Combine with organic mining** — the checklist is a starting point, not a ceiling. Always mine for assumptions unique to the user's specific situation
+5. **Use the probing questions** to surface assumptions the user can't articulate directly

package/bundled-skills/docs/integrations/jetski-cortex.md

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 ---
 title: Jetski/Cortex + Gemini Integration Guide
-description: "Use antigravity-awesome-skills with Jetski/Cortex without hitting context-window overflow with 1.404+ skills."
+description: "Use antigravity-awesome-skills with Jetski/Cortex without hitting context-window overflow with 1.407+ skills."
 ---
 
-# Jetski/Cortex + Gemini: safe integration with 1,1.404+ skills
+# Jetski/Cortex + Gemini: safe integration with 1,1.407+ skills
 
 This guide shows how to integrate the `antigravity-awesome-skills` repository with an agent based on **Jetski/Cortex + Gemini** (or similar frameworks) **without exceeding the model context window**.
 
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Never do:
 - concatenate all `SKILL.md` content into a single system prompt;
 - re-inject the entire library for **every** request.
 
-With over 1,1.404 skills, this approach fills the context window before user messages are even added, causing truncation.
+With over 1,1.407 skills, this approach fills the context window before user messages are even added, causing truncation.
 
 ---
 

package/bundled-skills/docs/integrations/jetski-gemini-loader/README.md

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ This example shows one way to integrate **antigravity-awesome-skills** with a Je
 - How to enforce a **maximum number of skills per turn** via `maxSkillsPerTurn`.
 - How to choose whether to **truncate or error** when too many skills are requested via `overflowBehavior`.
 
-This pattern avoids context overflow when you have 1,404+ skills installed.
+This pattern avoids context overflow when you have 1,407+ skills installed.
 
 ---
 

package/bundled-skills/docs/maintainers/repo-growth-seo.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ This document keeps the repository's GitHub-facing discovery copy aligned with t
 
 Preferred positioning:
 
-> Installable GitHub library of 1,404+ agentic skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, and other AI coding assistants.
+> Installable GitHub library of 1,407+ agentic skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, and other AI coding assistants.
 
 Key framing:
 
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Key framing:
 
 Preferred description:
 
-> Installable GitHub library of 1,404+ agentic skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, and more. Includes installer CLI, bundles, workflows, and official/community skill collections.
+> Installable GitHub library of 1,407+ agentic skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, and more. Includes installer CLI, bundles, workflows, and official/community skill collections.
 
 Preferred homepage:
 
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Preferred homepage:
 
 Preferred social preview:
 
-- use a clean preview image that says `1,404+ Agentic Skills`;
+- use a clean preview image that says `1,407+ Agentic Skills`;
 - mention Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI;
 - avoid dense text and tiny logos that disappear in social cards.
 

package/bundled-skills/docs/maintainers/skills-update-guide.md

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ For manual updates, you need:
 The update process refreshes:
 - Skills index (`skills_index.json`)
 - Web app skills data (`apps\web-app\public\skills.json`)
-- All 1,404+ skills from the skills directory
+- All 1,407+ skills from the skills directory
 
 ## When to Update
 

package/bundled-skills/docs/users/bundles.md

@@ -673,4 +673,4 @@ Found a skill that should be in a bundle? Or want to create a new bundle? [Open
 
 ---
 
-_Last updated: March 2026 | Total Skills: 1,404+ | Total Bundles: 37_
+_Last updated: March 2026 | Total Skills: 1,407+ | Total Bundles: 37_

package/bundled-skills/docs/users/claude-code-skills.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Install the library into Claude Code, then invoke focused skills directly in the
 
 ## Why use this repo for Claude Code
 
-- It includes 1,404+ skills instead of a narrow single-domain starter pack.
+- It includes 1,407+ skills instead of a narrow single-domain starter pack.
 - It supports the standard `.claude/skills/` path and the Claude Code plugin marketplace flow.
 - It also ships generated bundle plugins so teams can install focused packs like `Essentials` or `Security Developer` from the marketplace metadata.
 - It includes onboarding docs, bundles, and workflows so new users do not need to guess where to begin.

package/bundled-skills/docs/users/gemini-cli-skills.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Install into the Gemini skills path, then ask Gemini to apply one skill at a tim
 
 - It installs directly into the expected Gemini skills path.
 - It includes both core software engineering skills and deeper agent/LLM-oriented skills.
-- It helps new users get started with bundles and workflows rather than forcing a cold start from 1,404+ files.
+- It helps new users get started with bundles and workflows rather than forcing a cold start from 1,407+ files.
 - It is useful whether you want a broad internal skill library or a single repo to test many workflows quickly.
 
 ## Install Gemini CLI Skills

package/bundled-skills/docs/users/kiro-integration.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Kiro is AWS's agentic AI IDE that combines:
 
 Kiro's agentic capabilities are enhanced by skills that provide:
 
-- **Domain expertise** across 1,404+ specialized areas
+- **Domain expertise** across 1,407+ specialized areas
 - **Best practices** from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and AWS
 - **Workflow automation** for common development tasks
 - **AWS-specific patterns** for serverless, infrastructure, and cloud architecture

package/bundled-skills/docs/users/usage.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ If you came in through a **Claude Code** or **Codex** plugin instead of a full l
 
 When you ran `npx antigravity-awesome-skills` or cloned the repository, you:
 
-✅ **Downloaded 1,404+ skill files** to your computer (default: `~/.gemini/antigravity/skills/`; or a custom path like `~/.agent/skills/` if you used `--path`)  
+✅ **Downloaded 1,407+ skill files** to your computer (default: `~/.gemini/antigravity/skills/`; or a custom path like `~/.agent/skills/` if you used `--path`)  
 ✅ **Made them available** to your AI assistant  
 ❌ **Did NOT enable them all automatically** (they're just sitting there, waiting)
 
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Bundles are **curated groups** of skills organized by role. They help you decide
 
 **Analogy:**
 
-- You installed a toolbox with 1,404+ tools (✅ done)
+- You installed a toolbox with 1,407+ tools (✅ done)
 - Bundles are like **labeled organizer trays** saying: "If you're a carpenter, start with these 10 tools"
 - You can either **pick skills from the tray** or install that tray as a focused marketplace bundle plugin
 
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ Let's actually use a skill right now. Follow these steps:
 
 ## Step 5: Picking Your First Skills (Practical Advice)
 
-Don't try to use all 1,404+ skills at once. Here's a sensible approach:
+Don't try to use all 1,407+ skills at once. Here's a sensible approach:
 
 If you want a tool-specific starting point before choosing skills, use:
 
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ Usually no, but if your AI doesn't recognize a skill:
 
 ### "Can I load all skills into the model at once?"
 
-No. Even though you have 1,404+ skills installed locally, you should **not** concatenate every `SKILL.md` into a single system prompt or context block.
+No. Even though you have 1,407+ skills installed locally, you should **not** concatenate every `SKILL.md` into a single system prompt or context block.
 
 The intended pattern is:
 

package/bundled-skills/docs/users/visual-guide.md

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ antigravity-awesome-skills/
 ├── 📄 CONTRIBUTING.md                  ← Contributor workflow
 ├── 📄 CATALOG.md                       ← Full generated catalog
 │
-├── 📁 skills/                          ← 1,404+ skills live here
+├── 📁 skills/                          ← 1,407+ skills live here
 │   │
 │   ├── 📁 brainstorming/
 │   │   └── 📄 SKILL.md                 ← Skill definition
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ antigravity-awesome-skills/
 │   │   └── 📁 2d-games/
 │   │       └── 📄 SKILL.md             ← Nested skills also supported
 │   │
-│   └── ... (1,404+ total)
+│   └── ... (1,407+ total)
 │
 ├── 📁 apps/
 │   └── 📁 web-app/                     ← Interactive browser
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ antigravity-awesome-skills/
 
 ```
                     ┌─────────────────────────┐
-                    │  1,404+ SKILLS          │
+                    │  1,407+ SKILLS          │
                     └────────────┬────────────┘
                                  │
         ┌────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┐
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ If you want a workspace-style manual install instead, cloning into `.agent/skill
 │   ├── 📁 brainstorming/                 │
 │   ├── 📁 stripe-integration/            │
 │   ├── 📁 react-best-practices/          │
-│   └── ... (1,404+ total)                │
+│   └── ... (1,407+ total)                │
 └─────────────────────────────────────────┘
 ```