opencode-goopspec 0.1.4 → 0.1.6
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +7 -8
- package/agents/goop-debugger.md +2 -2
- package/agents/goop-designer.md +2 -2
- package/agents/goop-executor.md +17 -7
- package/agents/goop-explorer.md +2 -2
- package/agents/goop-librarian.md +1 -1
- package/agents/goop-orchestrator.md +47 -5
- package/agents/goop-planner.md +3 -3
- package/agents/goop-researcher.md +2 -2
- package/agents/goop-tester.md +1 -1
- package/agents/goop-verifier.md +2 -2
- package/agents/goop-writer.md +1 -1
- package/agents/memory-distiller.md +2 -2
- package/commands/goop-accept.md +27 -401
- package/commands/goop-discuss.md +29 -393
- package/commands/goop-execute.md +22 -356
- package/commands/goop-map-codebase.md +44 -478
- package/commands/goop-plan.md +23 -433
- package/commands/goop-quick.md +58 -31
- package/commands/goop-setup.md +35 -278
- package/commands/goop-specify.md +26 -291
- package/commands/goop-status.md +26 -261
- package/dist/index.js +34981 -239
- package/dist/worker/index.js +35883 -0
- package/package.json +5 -2
- package/references/accept-process.md +402 -0
- package/references/context-injection.md +1 -1
- package/references/discovery-interview.md +1 -1
- package/references/discuss-process.md +383 -0
- package/references/dispatch-patterns.md +46 -21
- package/references/enforcement-system.md +1 -1
- package/references/execute-process.md +358 -0
- package/references/git-workflow.md +349 -0
- package/references/handoff-protocol.md +1 -1
- package/references/map-codebase-process.md +353 -0
- package/references/model-profiles.md +16 -16
- package/references/orchestrator-philosophy.md +155 -223
- package/references/phase-gates.md +1 -1
- package/references/plan-process.md +397 -0
- package/references/plugin-architecture.md +1 -1
- package/references/quick-process.md +343 -0
- package/references/response-format.md +2 -2
- package/references/specify-process.md +251 -0
- package/references/status-process.md +253 -0
- package/references/subagent-protocol.md +2 -2
- package/references/team-coordination.md +183 -0
- package/references/xml-response-schema.md +5 -5
- package/skills/accessibility/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/accessibility-testing/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/api-docs/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/architecture-design/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/atomic-commits/skill.md +92 -15
- package/skills/code-review/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/codebase-mapping/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/convention-detection/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/debugging/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/deviation-handling/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/documentation/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/goop-core/skill.md +48 -11
- package/skills/memory-usage/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/parallel-planning/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/pattern-extraction/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/performance-optimization/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/playwright/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/playwright-testing/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/progress-tracking/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/readme-generation/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/research/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/responsive-design/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/scientific-method/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/security-audit/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/task-decomposition/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/task-delegation/skill.md +60 -34
- package/skills/technical-writing/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/testing/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/ui-design/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/ux-patterns/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/verification/skill.md +1 -1
- package/skills/visual-regression/skill.md +1 -1
- package/templates/blueprint.md +1 -1
- package/templates/chronicle.md +1 -1
- package/templates/handoff.md +1 -1
- package/templates/milestone.md +1 -1
- package/templates/project-knowledge-base.md +93 -0
- package/templates/project.md +1 -1
- package/templates/requirements.md +1 -1
- package/templates/research.md +1 -1
- package/templates/retrospective.md +1 -1
- package/templates/spec.md +1 -1
- package/templates/state.md +1 -1
- package/templates/summary.md +1 -1
package/commands/goop-discuss.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -13,422 +13,58 @@ alternatives:
|
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
14
|
# /goop-discuss
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
|
-
**Start the Discovery Interview.** Capture vision, requirements, constraints, and risks before planning
|
|
16
|
+
**Start the Discovery Interview.** Capture vision, requirements, constraints, and risks before planning.
|
|
17
17
|
|
|
18
|
-
##
|
|
18
|
+
## Immediate Action
|
|
19
19
|
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
/goop-discuss [brief description of what you want to build]
|
|
20
|
+
**STOP. Execute this tool call NOW before reading anything else:**
|
|
22
21
|
```
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
## Core Purpose
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
The Discovery Interview is a **mandatory gate** before planning. It ensures requirements are "nailed down" before any work begins.
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
```
|
|
29
|
-
+================================================================+
|
|
30
|
-
| NO PLANNING WITHOUT DISCOVERY. |
|
|
31
|
-
| The interview ensures we build the RIGHT thing. |
|
|
32
|
-
| Skipping discovery leads to scope creep and rework. |
|
|
33
|
-
+================================================================+
|
|
34
|
-
```
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
## Orchestrator Role
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
**YOU conduct the interview directly.** Do NOT spawn agents for conversation.
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
Why: The interview builds shared understanding. That understanding stays in YOUR context and informs how you delegate. Spawning for conversation fragments knowledge.
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
## The Six Questions
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
Every discovery interview MUST answer these questions:
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
### 1. Vision (The What)
|
|
47
|
-
- What are you trying to build?
|
|
48
|
-
- What problem does this solve?
|
|
49
|
-
- Who is this for?
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
### 2. Must-Haves (The Contract)
|
|
52
|
-
- What are the non-negotiable requirements?
|
|
53
|
-
- What MUST be delivered for this to be complete?
|
|
54
|
-
- What are the acceptance criteria?
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
### 3. Constraints (The Boundaries)
|
|
57
|
-
- What stack/frameworks are we using?
|
|
58
|
-
- What are the performance requirements?
|
|
59
|
-
- What existing code must we integrate with?
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
### 4. Out of Scope (The Guardrails)
|
|
62
|
-
- What are we explicitly NOT building?
|
|
63
|
-
- What features are deferred to later?
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
### 5. Assumptions (The Baseline)
|
|
66
|
-
- What existing functionality are we relying on?
|
|
67
|
-
- What decisions have already been made?
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
### 6. Risks (The Unknowns)
|
|
70
|
-
- What could go wrong?
|
|
71
|
-
- What are we uncertain about?
|
|
72
|
-
- What dependencies could block us?
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
## Tools Used
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
| Tool | Purpose in This Command |
|
|
77
|
-
|------|------------------------|
|
|
78
|
-
| `goop_status` | Check current phase and project state |
|
|
79
|
-
| `memory_search` | Find prior context about the project |
|
|
80
|
-
| `memory_save` | Persist discovery interview results |
|
|
81
|
-
| `goop_reference` | Load discovery-interview protocol |
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
**Hook Support:** `system.transform` injects relevant memories before execution.
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
---
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
## Process
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
### Phase 1: Setup
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
**Execute these checks BEFORE any user interaction:**
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
**1.1 Check current state:**
|
|
94
|
-
```
|
|
95
|
-
goop_status()
|
|
96
|
-
goop_state({ action: "get" }) # NEVER read state.json directly
|
|
97
|
-
Read(".goopspec/REQUIREMENTS.md") # If exists, interview was done
|
|
98
|
-
```
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
**CRITICAL: Never read or edit .goopspec/state.json directly. Always use `goop_state` tool.**
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
**1.2 If REQUIREMENTS.md exists:**
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
Use `question` tool:
|
|
105
|
-
- header: "Existing Discovery"
|
|
106
|
-
- question: "I found an existing discovery interview. How would you like to proceed?"
|
|
107
|
-
- options:
|
|
108
|
-
- "Start fresh (Recommended)" — Clear previous discovery, start new interview
|
|
109
|
-
- "Review and update" — Load previous answers, modify as needed
|
|
110
|
-
- "Use existing" — Skip interview, go straight to /goop-plan
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
**1.3 Initialize if needed:**
|
|
113
|
-
```bash
|
|
114
|
-
mkdir -p .goopspec
|
|
115
|
-
```
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
**1.4 Search memory for context:**
|
|
118
|
-
```
|
|
119
|
-
memory_search({ query: "project preferences architecture [user's topic]", limit: 5 })
|
|
120
|
-
```
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
122
|
-
Store relevant findings - use them to skip questions you already know answers to.
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
124
|
-
### Phase 2: Discovery Interview
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
126
|
-
**Display stage banner:**
|
|
127
|
-
```
|
|
128
|
-
## 🔮 GoopSpec · Discovery Interview
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
130
|
-
Let's nail down the requirements before planning.
|
|
131
|
-
I'll ask six key questions to understand your needs.
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
133
|
-
---
|
|
134
|
-
```
|
|
135
|
-
|
|
136
|
-
**2.1 Open the conversation:**
|
|
137
|
-
|
|
138
|
-
If `$ARGUMENTS` provided:
|
|
139
|
-
> "You want to **[argument]**. Let me understand this better."
|
|
140
|
-
|
|
141
|
-
Otherwise:
|
|
142
|
-
> "What do you want to build?"
|
|
143
|
-
|
|
144
|
-
**2.2 Work through the six questions:**
|
|
145
|
-
|
|
146
|
-
Ask naturally, not as a checklist. Weave questions based on their responses.
|
|
147
|
-
|
|
148
|
-
**Memory-first protocol:**
|
|
149
|
-
Before asking ANYTHING:
|
|
150
|
-
1. Check memory: `memory_search({ query: "[topic] preference" })`
|
|
151
|
-
2. If found: "I recall you prefer X for this. Still true? [Y/n]"
|
|
152
|
-
3. If not found: Ask, then SAVE the answer with `memory_note`
|
|
153
|
-
|
|
154
|
-
**2.3 Probe for specifics:**
|
|
155
|
-
|
|
156
|
-
| Vague Answer | Follow-up |
|
|
157
|
-
|--------------|-----------|
|
|
158
|
-
| "It should be fast" | "What's the target? Sub-100ms? Sub-1s?" |
|
|
159
|
-
| "Standard auth" | "JWT? Sessions? OAuth? What's the token TTL?" |
|
|
160
|
-
| "Good UX" | "What does that mean for this feature? Animations? Accessibility level?" |
|
|
161
|
-
|
|
162
|
-
**2.4 Checklist tracker (internal):**
|
|
163
|
-
|
|
164
|
-
Track progress through the six questions:
|
|
165
|
-
- [ ] Vision defined (goal, problem, users)
|
|
166
|
-
- [ ] Must-haves listed (at least 1)
|
|
167
|
-
- [ ] Constraints documented (stack, performance)
|
|
168
|
-
- [ ] Out of scope defined (at least 1 item)
|
|
169
|
-
- [ ] Assumptions listed
|
|
170
|
-
- [ ] Risks identified (at least 1 with mitigation)
|
|
171
|
-
|
|
172
|
-
**2.5 Completion check:**
|
|
173
|
-
|
|
174
|
-
When all six questions are answered, confirm:
|
|
175
|
-
|
|
176
|
-
Use `question` tool:
|
|
177
|
-
- header: "Discovery Check"
|
|
178
|
-
- question: "I think I have what I need. Let me summarize..."
|
|
179
|
-
- options:
|
|
180
|
-
- "Looks good, proceed" — Generate REQUIREMENTS.md
|
|
181
|
-
- "I want to add more" — Continue discussion
|
|
182
|
-
- "Start over" — Clear and restart interview
|
|
183
|
-
|
|
184
|
-
### Phase 3: Generate REQUIREMENTS.md
|
|
185
|
-
|
|
186
|
-
**Display stage banner:**
|
|
187
|
-
```
|
|
188
|
-
## 🔮 GoopSpec · Saving Discovery
|
|
189
|
-
|
|
190
|
-
⏳ Generating REQUIREMENTS.md...
|
|
191
|
-
|
|
192
|
-
---
|
|
193
|
-
```
|
|
194
|
-
|
|
195
|
-
**3.1 Create REQUIREMENTS.md:**
|
|
196
|
-
|
|
197
|
-
Write directly (orchestrator can write planning docs):
|
|
198
|
-
|
|
199
|
-
```markdown
|
|
200
|
-
# REQUIREMENTS: [Feature Name]
|
|
201
|
-
|
|
202
|
-
**Generated:** [timestamp]
|
|
203
|
-
**Interview Status:** Complete
|
|
204
|
-
**Ready for Planning:** Yes
|
|
205
|
-
|
|
206
|
-
---
|
|
207
|
-
|
|
208
|
-
## Vision
|
|
209
|
-
|
|
210
|
-
[Vision statement from interview]
|
|
211
|
-
|
|
212
|
-
**Problem Solved:** [From interview]
|
|
213
|
-
|
|
214
|
-
**Why Now:** [From interview]
|
|
215
|
-
|
|
216
|
-
---
|
|
217
|
-
|
|
218
|
-
## Must-Haves (The Contract)
|
|
219
|
-
|
|
220
|
-
- [ ] **MH1**: [Title]
|
|
221
|
-
- [Description]
|
|
222
|
-
- **Acceptance:** [Criteria]
|
|
223
|
-
|
|
224
|
-
- [ ] **MH2**: [Title]
|
|
225
|
-
- [Description]
|
|
226
|
-
- **Acceptance:** [Criteria]
|
|
227
|
-
|
|
228
|
-
---
|
|
229
|
-
|
|
230
|
-
## Out of Scope
|
|
231
|
-
|
|
232
|
-
- **[Item]** — [Reason]
|
|
233
|
-
- **[Item]** — [Reason]
|
|
234
|
-
|
|
235
|
-
---
|
|
236
|
-
|
|
237
|
-
## Constraints
|
|
238
|
-
|
|
239
|
-
### Technical Constraints
|
|
240
|
-
- [Stack, frameworks, versions]
|
|
241
|
-
|
|
242
|
-
### Practical Constraints
|
|
243
|
-
- [Timeline, resources]
|
|
244
|
-
|
|
245
|
-
---
|
|
246
|
-
|
|
247
|
-
## Assumptions
|
|
248
|
-
|
|
249
|
-
- **[Assumption]** — If false: [Impact]
|
|
250
|
-
|
|
251
|
-
---
|
|
252
|
-
|
|
253
|
-
## Risks & Mitigations
|
|
254
|
-
|
|
255
|
-
| Risk | Impact | Likelihood | Mitigation |
|
|
256
|
-
|------|--------|------------|------------|
|
|
257
|
-
| [Risk] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Plan] |
|
|
258
|
-
|
|
259
|
-
---
|
|
260
|
-
|
|
261
|
-
*Discovery interview completed. Ready for /goop-plan.*
|
|
22
|
+
goop_reference({ name: "discuss-process" })
|
|
262
23
|
```
|
|
263
24
|
|
|
264
|
-
**
|
|
25
|
+
**Then follow the process from that reference.** Do not process user messages until you have loaded and understood the protocol.
|
|
265
26
|
|
|
266
|
-
|
|
267
|
-
goop_state({ action: "complete-interview" })
|
|
268
|
-
```
|
|
269
|
-
|
|
270
|
-
This atomically updates the workflow state. **NEVER edit state.json directly.**
|
|
27
|
+
## Quick Summary
|
|
271
28
|
|
|
272
|
-
**
|
|
29
|
+
**You conduct the interview directly.** Do NOT spawn agents for conversation.
|
|
273
30
|
|
|
274
|
-
|
|
275
|
-
memory_save({
|
|
276
|
-
type: "note",
|
|
277
|
-
title: "Discovery: [Feature Name]",
|
|
278
|
-
content: "[Summary of key requirements and constraints]",
|
|
279
|
-
concepts: ["discovery", "requirements", "[domain]"],
|
|
280
|
-
importance: 0.7
|
|
281
|
-
})
|
|
282
|
-
```
|
|
283
|
-
|
|
284
|
-
### Phase 4: Completion
|
|
285
|
-
|
|
286
|
-
**Display completion banner:**
|
|
287
|
-
|
|
288
|
-
```
|
|
289
|
-
## 🔮 GoopSpec · Discovery Complete
|
|
31
|
+
### The Six Questions
|
|
290
32
|
|
|
291
|
-
|
|
33
|
+
1. **Vision** — What are you building? What problem? Who for?
|
|
34
|
+
2. **Must-Haves** — Non-negotiable requirements and acceptance criteria
|
|
35
|
+
3. **Constraints** — Stack, frameworks, performance, timeline
|
|
36
|
+
4. **Out of Scope** — What we're NOT building
|
|
37
|
+
5. **Assumptions** — What we're relying on being true
|
|
38
|
+
6. **Risks** — What could go wrong? Mitigations?
|
|
292
39
|
|
|
293
|
-
|
|
40
|
+
### Tools Used
|
|
294
41
|
|
|
295
|
-
|
|
|
296
|
-
|----------|--------|
|
|
297
|
-
| Vision | ✓ Defined |
|
|
298
|
-
| Must-Haves | ✓ [N] items |
|
|
299
|
-
| Constraints | ✓ Documented |
|
|
300
|
-
| Out of Scope | ✓ [M] items |
|
|
301
|
-
| Assumptions | ✓ Listed |
|
|
302
|
-
| Risks | ✓ [P] identified |
|
|
303
|
-
|
|
304
|
-
### Next Step
|
|
305
|
-
|
|
306
|
-
**Create the blueprint** — Transform requirements into an execution plan
|
|
307
|
-
|
|
308
|
-
→ `/goop-plan`
|
|
309
|
-
|
|
310
|
-
---
|
|
311
|
-
|
|
312
|
-
**Also available:**
|
|
313
|
-
- `cat .goopspec/REQUIREMENTS.md` — Review discovery output
|
|
314
|
-
- `/goop-research [topic]` — Investigate unknowns first
|
|
315
|
-
```
|
|
316
|
-
|
|
317
|
-
## Output
|
|
318
|
-
|
|
319
|
-
| File | Purpose |
|
|
42
|
+
| Tool | Purpose |
|
|
320
43
|
|------|---------|
|
|
321
|
-
|
|
|
322
|
-
|
|
|
323
|
-
|
|
324
|
-
|
|
325
|
-
|
|
326
|
-
| Outcome | Next Step |
|
|
327
|
-
|---------|-----------|
|
|
328
|
-
| Discovery complete | `/goop-plan` to create blueprint |
|
|
329
|
-
| Unknowns found | `/goop-research` to investigate |
|
|
330
|
-
| Small task | `/goop-quick` to skip planning |
|
|
331
|
-
|
|
332
|
-
## Bypass Conditions
|
|
333
|
-
|
|
334
|
-
Discovery MAY be skipped only for:
|
|
335
|
-
- `/goop-quick` small tasks (single file, < 30 min work)
|
|
336
|
-
- Bug fixes with clear reproduction steps
|
|
337
|
-
- Documentation-only changes
|
|
338
|
-
|
|
339
|
-
## Examples
|
|
340
|
-
|
|
341
|
-
**Simple Feature:**
|
|
342
|
-
```
|
|
343
|
-
User: /goop-discuss add dark mode toggle
|
|
344
|
-
|
|
345
|
-
Orchestrator: "Dark mode toggle. Let me understand what you need.
|
|
44
|
+
| `goop_status` | Check current phase |
|
|
45
|
+
| `goop_state` | Update workflow state (NEVER edit state.json directly) |
|
|
46
|
+
| `memory_search` | Find prior context |
|
|
47
|
+
| `memory_save` | Persist interview results |
|
|
48
|
+
| `goop_reference` | Load detailed process |
|
|
346
49
|
|
|
347
|
-
|
|
348
|
-
- Toggle in settings that switches the app theme
|
|
349
|
-
- Persist preference across sessions
|
|
350
|
-
- Respect system preference as default
|
|
351
|
-
|
|
352
|
-
**Must-haves:** What MUST work?
|
|
353
|
-
- Toggle UI in settings
|
|
354
|
-
- Theme actually changes
|
|
355
|
-
- Persists to localStorage
|
|
356
|
-
|
|
357
|
-
**Out of scope?**
|
|
358
|
-
- Per-component theme overrides
|
|
359
|
-
- Multiple theme options beyond light/dark
|
|
360
|
-
|
|
361
|
-
**Constraints?**
|
|
362
|
-
- Using existing Tailwind dark: classes
|
|
363
|
-
- No new dependencies
|
|
364
|
-
|
|
365
|
-
**Assumptions?**
|
|
366
|
-
- CSS already has dark variants (will verify)
|
|
367
|
-
|
|
368
|
-
**Risks?**
|
|
369
|
-
- Some components may not have dark styles → will audit first
|
|
370
|
-
|
|
371
|
-
Great, I have what I need. Creating REQUIREMENTS.md..."
|
|
372
|
-
```
|
|
373
|
-
|
|
374
|
-
**Complex Feature:**
|
|
375
|
-
```
|
|
376
|
-
User: /goop-discuss rebuild the payment system
|
|
377
|
-
|
|
378
|
-
Orchestrator: "Payment system rebuild - that's significant.
|
|
379
|
-
Let me understand the scope.
|
|
380
|
-
|
|
381
|
-
**Vision:** What's driving this?
|
|
382
|
-
- Current system uses deprecated Stripe API
|
|
383
|
-
- Need to add PayPal as alternative
|
|
384
|
-
- Improve error handling and retry logic
|
|
385
|
-
|
|
386
|
-
**Must-haves:**
|
|
387
|
-
- Migrate to Stripe v2 API
|
|
388
|
-
- Add PayPal integration
|
|
389
|
-
- Unified payment interface
|
|
390
|
-
- Retry with exponential backoff
|
|
391
|
-
- Webhook handling for async payments
|
|
392
|
-
|
|
393
|
-
**Out of scope:**
|
|
394
|
-
- Cryptocurrency payments (future)
|
|
395
|
-
- Subscription management (separate project)
|
|
396
|
-
|
|
397
|
-
**Risks:**
|
|
398
|
-
- Stripe migration may have breaking changes → research first
|
|
399
|
-
- PayPal integration complexity unknown → estimate 2x buffer
|
|
50
|
+
## Output
|
|
400
51
|
|
|
401
|
-
|
|
402
|
-
|
|
403
|
-
```
|
|
52
|
+
- `.goopspec/REQUIREMENTS.md` — Discovery interview output
|
|
53
|
+
- State updated with `interviewComplete: true`
|
|
404
54
|
|
|
405
55
|
## Success Criteria
|
|
406
56
|
|
|
57
|
+
- [ ] Existing project documents archived (if present)
|
|
407
58
|
- [ ] All six questions answered with specifics
|
|
408
|
-
- [ ] At least 1 must-have defined
|
|
409
|
-
- [ ] At least 1 out-of-scope item defined
|
|
410
|
-
- [ ] At least 1 risk with mitigation
|
|
59
|
+
- [ ] At least 1 must-have, 1 out-of-scope, 1 risk defined
|
|
411
60
|
- [ ] REQUIREMENTS.md created
|
|
412
61
|
- [ ] State updated via `goop_state({ action: "complete-interview" })`
|
|
413
|
-
- [ ] User knows next step is `/goop-plan`
|
|
414
62
|
|
|
415
63
|
## Anti-Patterns
|
|
416
64
|
|
|
417
|
-
**DON'T:**
|
|
418
|
-
|
|
419
|
-
- Skip the risks question ("nothing could go wrong")
|
|
420
|
-
- Rush through to get to coding
|
|
421
|
-
- Spawn agents to conduct the interview
|
|
422
|
-
- Create SPEC.md directly (that's /goop-plan's job)
|
|
423
|
-
|
|
424
|
-
**DO:**
|
|
425
|
-
- Probe vague answers for specifics
|
|
426
|
-
- Challenge "no risks" with scenarios
|
|
427
|
-
- Take time - discovery is highest leverage
|
|
428
|
-
- Conduct interview yourself (keeps context)
|
|
429
|
-
- Save answers to memory for future reference
|
|
65
|
+
**DON'T:** Accept vague answers, skip risks, rush, spawn agents for interview
|
|
66
|
+
**DO:** Probe for specifics, challenge "no risks", conduct interview yourself
|
|
430
67
|
|
|
431
68
|
---
|
|
432
69
|
|
|
433
|
-
*
|
|
434
|
-
*"Nail the spec before you write the code."*
|
|
70
|
+
*Load `goop_reference({ name: "discuss-process" })` for full process details.*
|