opencode-codegraph 0.1.16 → 0.1.18

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## 0.1.18 - 2026-03-20
+
+- make after-test guidance test-result aware so failing test runs explicitly block review/push guidance until failures are fixed
+
+## 0.1.17 - 2026-03-20
+
+- include git branch and worktree cleanliness in dogfooding status summaries shown in OpenCode
+
 ## 0.1.16 - 2026-03-20
 
 - include branch and worktree cleanliness in dogfooding status summaries

package/README.md

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ If the message suggests workflow guidance intent (`what next`, `am I done`, `can
 Every conversation includes:
 
 - a project summary with file count, top complexity hotspots, and open security findings;
-- a lightweight dogfooding status block when available, including freshness, current `HEAD`, review-trace state, and recommended next action.
+- a lightweight dogfooding status block when available, including freshness, current `HEAD`, git branch/worktree cleanliness, review-trace state, and recommended next action.
 - the same status block now also includes branch and worktree cleanliness, which lets guided commands distinguish `changes_pending_review` from `ready_to_push`.
 - a recommended command (`/status`, `/update`, or `/review`) when the workflow can point to a deterministic next step.
 - a normalized workflow state so the session can distinguish `refresh_needed`, `trace_pending`, `review_required`, and `ready_to_continue`.
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ Place in `.opencode/commands/`:
 | `chat.message` | Add CPG context for mentioned files |
 | `chat.message` (edit intent) | Add pre-edit warnings for files likely to be modified |
 | `chat.message` (workflow intent) | Add dogfooding status when the user asks what to do next |
-| `tool.execute.after` on test commands | Add after-test workflow guidance with the next recommended command |
+| `tool.execute.after` on test commands | Add after-test workflow guidance and detect failed test runs before suggesting the next command |
 | `tool.execute.after` | Trigger CPG update after git commit and append structured post-commit review summary |
 | `experimental.session.compacting` | Preserve current dogfooding status when OpenCode compacts long sessions |
 | `command.execute.before` | Inject current dogfooding status into `/review`, `/audit`, `/update`, `/status`, and `/next` |

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "opencode-codegraph",
-  "version": "0.1.16",
+  "version": "0.1.18",
   "description": "OpenCode plugin for CodeGraph CPG-powered code analysis",
   "type": "module",
   "main": "src/index.ts",

package/src/index.ts

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ import { CodeGraphAPI } from "./api"
 import {
   extractFileRefs,
   fileNeedsRegistrationCheck,
+  didTestCommandFail,
   formatAfterTestGuidance,
   formatDogfoodStatusSummary,
   formatPendingReviewTraceSummary,
@@ -174,13 +175,15 @@ const codegraphPlugin: Plugin = async (input) => {
         try {
           const rawStatus = await $`python -m src.cli.import_commands dogfood status --json`.quiet().text()
           const status = JSON.parse(rawStatus)
-          const guidance = formatAfterTestGuidance(status)
+          const testFailed = didTestCommandFail(output.output)
+          const guidance = formatAfterTestGuidance(status, testFailed)
           if (guidance) {
             output.title = "CodeGraph: after-test guidance ready"
             const existingOutput = output.output?.trimEnd() || ""
             output.output = existingOutput ? `${existingOutput}\n\n${guidance}` : guidance
             output.metadata = {
               ...output.metadata,
+              codegraph_after_test_result: testFailed ? "failed" : "passed_or_unknown",
               codegraph_after_test_workflow_state: status.workflow_state || null,
               codegraph_after_test_next_action: status.recommended_next_action || null,
               codegraph_after_test_recommended_command: status.recommended_command || null,

package/src/util.ts

@@ -99,6 +99,19 @@ export function isTestCommand(command: string): boolean {
   )
 }
 
+export function didTestCommandFail(output: string): boolean {
+  if (!output) return false
+  const normalized = output.toLowerCase()
+  return [
+    "failed",
+    "error:",
+    "errors:",
+    "assertionerror",
+    "test failed",
+    "1 failed",
+  ].some((pattern) => normalized.includes(pattern))
+}
+
 /**
  * Heuristic: detect whether the user is likely asking to modify code.
  */
@@ -398,7 +411,10 @@ export function formatDogfoodStatusSummary(snapshot: DogfoodStatusSnapshot): str
   return lines.join("\n")
 }
 
-export function formatAfterTestGuidance(snapshot: DogfoodStatusSnapshot): string | null {
+export function formatAfterTestGuidance(
+  snapshot: DogfoodStatusSnapshot,
+  testFailed = false,
+): string | null {
   const workflowState = snapshot.workflow_state
   const nextAction = snapshot.recommended_next_action
   const nextCommand = snapshot.recommended_command
@@ -408,6 +424,12 @@ export function formatAfterTestGuidance(snapshot: DogfoodStatusSnapshot): string
   }
 
   const lines = ["## CodeGraph After-Test Guidance", ""]
+  if (testFailed) {
+    lines.push("- Test result: failed")
+    lines.push("- Next action: fix the failing tests before trusting review or push guidance")
+    lines.push("- Suggested command: rerun the failing tests after you fix them")
+    return lines.join("\n")
+  }
   if (workflowState) {
     lines.push(`- Workflow state: ${workflowState}`)
   }