open-multi-agent-kit 0.80.2 → 0.80.4

package/templates/skills/kimi/speckit-specify/SKILL.md

@@ -1,325 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "speckit-specify"
-description: "Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description."
-compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
-metadata:
-  author: "github-spec-kit"
-  source: "templates/commands/specify.md"
----
-
-
-## User Input
-
-```text
-$ARGUMENTS
-```
-
-You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
-
-## Pre-Execution Checks
-
-**Check for extension hooks (before specification)**:
-- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
-- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_specify` key
-- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
-- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
-- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
-  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
-  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
-- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
-  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
-    ```
-    ## Extension Hooks
-
-    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
-    Command: `/{command}`
-    Description: {description}
-
-    Prompt: {prompt}
-    To execute: `/{command}`
-    ```
-  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
-    ```
-    ## Extension Hooks
-
-    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
-    Executing: `/{command}`
-    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
-
-    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
-    ```
-- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
-
-## Outline
-
-The text the user typed after `/speckit-specify` in the triggering message **is** the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if `$ARGUMENTS` appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.
-
-Given that feature description, do this:
-
-1. **Generate a concise short name** (2-4 words) for the feature:
-   - Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
-   - Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
-   - Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
-   - Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
-   - Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
-   - Examples:
-     - "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
-     - "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
-     - "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
-     - "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
-
-2. **Branch creation** (optional, via hook):
-
-   If a `before_specify` hook ran successfully in the Pre-Execution Checks above, it will have created/switched to a git branch and output JSON containing `BRANCH_NAME` and `FEATURE_NUM`. Note these values for reference, but the branch name does **not** dictate the spec directory name.
-
-   If the user explicitly provided `GIT_BRANCH_NAME`, pass it through to the hook so the branch script uses the exact value as the branch name (bypassing all prefix/suffix generation).
-
-3. **Create the spec feature directory**:
-
-   Specs live under the default `specs/` directory unless the user explicitly provides `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`.
-
-   **Resolution order for `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`**:
-   1. If the user explicitly provided `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` (e.g., via environment variable, argument, or configuration), use it as-is
-   2. Otherwise, auto-generate it under `specs/`:
-      - Check `.specify/init-options.json` for `branch_numbering`
-      - If `"timestamp"`: prefix is `YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS` (current timestamp)
-      - If `"sequential"` or absent: prefix is `NNN` (next available 3-digit number after scanning existing directories in `specs/`)
-      - Construct the directory name: `<prefix>-<short-name>` (e.g., `003-user-auth` or `20260319-143022-user-auth`)
-      - Set `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` to `specs/<directory-name>`
-
-   **Create the directory and spec file**:
-   - `mkdir -p SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`
-   - Copy `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/spec.md` as the starting point
-   - Set `SPEC_FILE` to `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/spec.md`
-   - Persist the resolved path to `.specify/feature.json`:
-     ```json
-     {
-       "feature_directory": "<resolved feature dir>"
-     }
-     ```
-     Write the actual resolved directory path value (for example, `specs/003-user-auth`), not the literal string `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`.
-     This allows downstream commands (`/speckit-plan`, `/speckit-tasks`, etc.) to locate the feature directory without relying on git branch name conventions.
-
-   **IMPORTANT**:
-   - You must only create one feature per `/speckit-specify` invocation
-   - The spec directory name and the git branch name are independent — they may be the same but that is the user's choice
-   - The spec directory and file are always created by this command, never by the hook
-
-4. Load `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to understand required sections.
-
-5. Follow this execution flow:
-    1. Parse user description from arguments
-       If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
-    2. Extract key concepts from description
-       Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
-    3. For unclear aspects:
-       - Make informed guesses based on context and industry standards
-       - Only mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] if:
-         - The choice significantly impacts feature scope or user experience
-         - Multiple reasonable interpretations exist with different implications
-         - No reasonable default exists
-       - **LIMIT: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers total**
-       - Prioritize clarifications by impact: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
-    4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
-       If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
-    5. Generate Functional Requirements
-       Each requirement must be testable
-       Use reasonable defaults for unspecified details (document assumptions in Assumptions section)
-    6. Define Success Criteria
-       Create measurable, technology-agnostic outcomes
-       Include both quantitative metrics (time, performance, volume) and qualitative measures (user satisfaction, task completion)
-       Each criterion must be verifiable without implementation details
-    7. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
-    8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
-
-6. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
-
-7. **Specification Quality Validation**: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
-
-   a. **Create Spec Quality Checklist**: Generate a checklist file at `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/checklists/requirements.md` using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
-
-      ```markdown
-      # Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
-      
-      **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
-      **Created**: [DATE]
-      **Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
-      
-      ## Content Quality
-      
-      - [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
-      - [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
-      - [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
-      - [ ] All mandatory sections completed
-      
-      ## Requirement Completeness
-      
-      - [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
-      - [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
-      - [ ] Success criteria are measurable
-      - [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
-      - [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
-      - [ ] Edge cases are identified
-      - [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
-      - [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
-      
-      ## Feature Readiness
-      
-      - [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
-      - [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
-      - [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
-      - [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
-      
-      ## Notes
-      
-      - Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit-clarify` or `/speckit-plan`
-      ```
-
-   b. **Run Validation Check**: Review the spec against each checklist item:
-      - For each item, determine if it passes or fails
-      - Document specific issues found (quote relevant spec sections)
-
-   c. **Handle Validation Results**:
-
-      - **If all items pass**: Mark checklist complete and proceed to step 8
-
-      - **If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION])**:
-        1. List the failing items and specific issues
-        2. Update the spec to address each issue
-        3. Re-run validation until all items pass (max 3 iterations)
-        4. If still failing after 3 iterations, document remaining issues in checklist notes and warn user
-
-      - **If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain**:
-        1. Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
-        2. **LIMIT CHECK**: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
-        3. For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
-
-           ```markdown
-           ## Question [N]: [Topic]
-           
-           **Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
-           
-           **What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
-           
-           **Suggested Answers**:
-           
-           | Option | Answer | Implications |
-           |--------|--------|--------------|
-           | A      | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
-           | B      | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
-           | C      | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
-           | Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
-           
-           **Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
-           ```
-
-        4. **CRITICAL - Table Formatting**: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
-           - Use consistent spacing with pipes aligned
-           - Each cell should have spaces around content: `| Content |` not `|Content|`
-           - Header separator must have at least 3 dashes: `|--------|`
-           - Test that the table renders correctly in markdown preview
-        5. Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
-        6. Present all questions together before waiting for responses
-        7. Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
-        8. Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
-        9. Re-run validation after all clarifications are resolved
-
-   d. **Update Checklist**: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
-
-8. **Report completion** to the user with:
-   - `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` — the feature directory path
-   - `SPEC_FILE` — the spec file path
-   - Checklist results summary
-   - Readiness for the next phase (`/speckit-clarify` or `/speckit-plan`)
-
-9. **Check for extension hooks**: After reporting completion, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
-   - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_specify` key
-   - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
-   - Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
-   - For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
-     - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
-     - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
-   - For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
-     - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
-       ```
-       ## Extension Hooks
-
-       **Optional Hook**: {extension}
-       Command: `/{command}`
-       Description: {description}
-
-       Prompt: {prompt}
-       To execute: `/{command}`
-       ```
-     - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
-       ```
-       ## Extension Hooks
-
-       **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
-       Executing: `/{command}`
-       EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
-       ```
-   - If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
-
-**NOTE:** Branch creation is handled by the `before_specify` hook (git extension). Spec directory and file creation are always handled by this core command.
-
-## Quick Guidelines
-
-- Focus on **WHAT** users need and **WHY**.
-- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
-- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
-- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
-
-### Section Requirements
-
-- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
-- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
-- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
-
-### For AI Generation
-
-When creating this spec from a user prompt:
-
-1. **Make informed guesses**: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
-2. **Document assumptions**: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
-3. **Limit clarifications**: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
-   - Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
-   - Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
-   - Lack any reasonable default
-4. **Prioritize clarifications**: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
-5. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
-6. **Common areas needing clarification** (only if no reasonable default exists):
-   - Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
-   - User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
-   - Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
-
-**Examples of reasonable defaults** (don't ask about these):
-
-- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
-- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
-- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
-- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
-- Integration patterns: Use project-appropriate patterns (REST/GraphQL for web services, function calls for libraries, CLI args for tools, etc.)
-
-### Success Criteria Guidelines
-
-Success criteria must be:
-
-1. **Measurable**: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
-2. **Technology-agnostic**: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
-3. **User-focused**: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
-4. **Verifiable**: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
-
-**Good examples**:
-
-- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
-- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
-- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
-- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
-
-**Bad examples** (implementation-focused):
-
-- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
-- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
-- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
-- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)

package/templates/skills/kimi/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md

@@ -1,197 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "speckit-tasks"
-description: "Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts."
-compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
-metadata:
-  author: "github-spec-kit"
-  source: "templates/commands/tasks.md"
----
-
-
-## User Input
-
-```text
-$ARGUMENTS
-```
-
-You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
-
-## Pre-Execution Checks
-
-**Check for extension hooks (before tasks generation)**:
-- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
-- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_tasks` key
-- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
-- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
-- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
-  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
-  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
-- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
-  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
-    ```
-    ## Extension Hooks
-
-    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
-    Command: `/{command}`
-    Description: {description}
-
-    Prompt: {prompt}
-    To execute: `/{command}`
-    ```
-  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
-    ```
-    ## Extension Hooks
-
-    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
-    Executing: `/{command}`
-    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
-    
-    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
-    ```
-- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
-
-## Outline
-
-1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/setup-tasks.sh --json` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR, TASKS_TEMPLATE, and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. `FEATURE_DIR` and `TASKS_TEMPLATE` must be absolute paths when provided. `AVAILABLE_DOCS` is a list of document names/relative paths available under `FEATURE_DIR` (for example `research.md` or `contracts/`). For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
-
-2. **Load design documents**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
-   - **Required**: plan.md (tech stack, libraries, structure), spec.md (user stories with priorities)
-   - **Optional**: data-model.md (entities), contracts/ (interface contracts), research.md (decisions), quickstart.md (test scenarios)
-   - Note: Not all projects have all documents. Generate tasks based on what's available.
-
-3. **Execute task generation workflow**:
-   - Load plan.md and extract tech stack, libraries, project structure
-   - Load spec.md and extract user stories with their priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.)
-   - If data-model.md exists: Extract entities and map to user stories
-   - If contracts/ exists: Map interface contracts to user stories
-   - If research.md exists: Extract decisions for setup tasks
-   - Generate tasks organized by user story (see Task Generation Rules below)
-   - Generate dependency graph showing user story completion order
-   - Create parallel execution examples per user story
-   - Validate task completeness (each user story has all needed tasks, independently testable)
-
-4. **Generate tasks.md**: Read the tasks template from TASKS_TEMPLATE (from the JSON output above) and use it as structure. If TASKS_TEMPLATE is empty, fall back to `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md`. Fill with:
-   - Correct feature name from plan.md
-   - Phase 1: Setup tasks (project initialization)
-   - Phase 2: Foundational tasks (blocking prerequisites for all user stories)
-   - Phase 3+: One phase per user story (in priority order from spec.md)
-   - Each phase includes: story goal, independent test criteria, tests (if requested), implementation tasks
-   - Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting concerns
-   - All tasks must follow the strict checklist format (see Task Generation Rules below)
-   - Clear file paths for each task
-   - Dependencies section showing story completion order
-   - Parallel execution examples per story
-   - Implementation strategy section (MVP first, incremental delivery)
-
-5. **Report**: Output path to generated tasks.md and summary:
-   - Total task count
-   - Task count per user story
-   - Parallel opportunities identified
-   - Independent test criteria for each story
-   - Suggested MVP scope (typically just User Story 1)
-   - Format validation: Confirm ALL tasks follow the checklist format (checkbox, ID, labels, file paths)
-
-6. **Check for extension hooks**: After tasks.md is generated, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
-   - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_tasks` key
-   - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
-   - Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
-   - For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
-     - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
-     - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
-   - For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
-     - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
-       ```
-       ## Extension Hooks
-
-       **Optional Hook**: {extension}
-       Command: `/{command}`
-       Description: {description}
-
-       Prompt: {prompt}
-       To execute: `/{command}`
-       ```
-     - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
-       ```
-       ## Extension Hooks
-
-       **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
-       Executing: `/{command}`
-       EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
-       ```
-   - If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
-
-Context for task generation: $ARGUMENTS
-
-The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
-
-## Task Generation Rules
-
-**CRITICAL**: Tasks MUST be organized by user story to enable independent implementation and testing.
-
-**Tests are OPTIONAL**: Only generate test tasks if explicitly requested in the feature specification or if user requests TDD approach.
-
-### Checklist Format (REQUIRED)
-
-Every task MUST strictly follow this format:
-
-```text
-- [ ] [TaskID] [P?] [Story?] Description with file path
-```
-
-**Format Components**:
-
-1. **Checkbox**: ALWAYS start with `- [ ]` (markdown checkbox)
-2. **Task ID**: Sequential number (T001, T002, T003...) in execution order
-3. **[P] marker**: Include ONLY if task is parallelizable (different files, no dependencies on incomplete tasks)
-4. **[Story] label**: REQUIRED for user story phase tasks only
-   - Format: [US1], [US2], [US3], etc. (maps to user stories from spec.md)
-   - Setup phase: NO story label
-   - Foundational phase: NO story label  
-   - User Story phases: MUST have story label
-   - Polish phase: NO story label
-5. **Description**: Clear action with exact file path
-
-**Examples**:
-
-- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan`
-- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication middleware in src/middleware/auth.py`
-- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create User model in src/models/user.py`
-- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement UserService in src/services/user_service.py`
-- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] Create User model` (missing ID and Story label)
-- ❌ WRONG: `T001 [US1] Create model` (missing checkbox)
-- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] [US1] Create User model` (missing Task ID)
-- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] T001 [US1] Create model` (missing file path)
-
-### Task Organization
-
-1. **From User Stories (spec.md)** - PRIMARY ORGANIZATION:
-   - Each user story (P1, P2, P3...) gets its own phase
-   - Map all related components to their story:
-     - Models needed for that story
-     - Services needed for that story
-     - Interfaces/UI needed for that story
-     - If tests requested: Tests specific to that story
-   - Mark story dependencies (most stories should be independent)
-
-2. **From Contracts**:
-   - Map each interface contract → to the user story it serves
-   - If tests requested: Each interface contract → contract test task [P] before implementation in that story's phase
-
-3. **From Data Model**:
-   - Map each entity to the user story(ies) that need it
-   - If entity serves multiple stories: Put in earliest story or Setup phase
-   - Relationships → service layer tasks in appropriate story phase
-
-4. **From Setup/Infrastructure**:
-   - Shared infrastructure → Setup phase (Phase 1)
-   - Foundational/blocking tasks → Foundational phase (Phase 2)
-   - Story-specific setup → within that story's phase
-
-### Phase Structure
-
-- **Phase 1**: Setup (project initialization)
-- **Phase 2**: Foundational (blocking prerequisites - MUST complete before user stories)
-- **Phase 3+**: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
-  - Within each story: Tests (if requested) → Models → Services → Endpoints → Integration
-  - Each phase should be a complete, independently testable increment
-- **Final Phase**: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns

package/templates/skills/kimi/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md

@@ -1,101 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "speckit-taskstoissues"
-description: "Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts."
-compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
-metadata:
-  author: "github-spec-kit"
-  source: "templates/commands/taskstoissues.md"
----
-
-
-## User Input
-
-```text
-$ARGUMENTS
-```
-
-You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
-
-## Pre-Execution Checks
-
-**Check for extension hooks (before tasks-to-issues conversion)**:
-- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
-- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_taskstoissues` key
-- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
-- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
-- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
-  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
-  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
-- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
-  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
-    ```
-    ## Extension Hooks
-
-    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
-    Command: `/{command}`
-    Description: {description}
-
-    Prompt: {prompt}
-    To execute: `/{command}`
-    ```
-  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
-    ```
-    ## Extension Hooks
-
-    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
-    Executing: `/{command}`
-    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
-
-    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
-    ```
-- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
-
-## Outline
-
-1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
-1. From the executed script, extract the path to **tasks**.
-1. Get the Git remote by running:
-
-```bash
-git config --get remote.origin.url
-```
-
-> [!CAUTION]
-> ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
-
-1. For each task in the list, use the GitHub MCP server to create a new issue in the repository that is representative of the Git remote.
-
-> [!CAUTION]
-> UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
-
-## Post-Execution Checks
-
-**Check for extension hooks (after tasks-to-issues conversion)**:
-Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
-- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_taskstoissues` key
-- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
-- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
-- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
-  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
-  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
-- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
-  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
-    ```
-    ## Extension Hooks
-
-    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
-    Command: `/{command}`
-    Description: {description}
-
-    Prompt: {prompt}
-    To execute: `/{command}`
-    ```
-  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
-    ```
-    ## Extension Hooks
-
-    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
-    Executing: `/{command}`
-    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
-    ```
-- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently

package/templates/skills/kimi/think/SKILL.md

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
----
-name: think
-description: Slash command for OMK reasoning-depth control, thinking variant cycling, and model-variant selection without exposing prompts or secrets.
----
-
-# /think
-
-Control OMK reasoning depth for the current chat/session. Use this when you need a quick toggle (`/think`) or an explicit reasoning level before a difficult planning, coding, or review turn.
-
-## Commands
-
-```bash
-/think
-/think next
-/think medium
-/think high
-/think xhigh
-/think max
-/think variant <name>
-/thinking <level>
-```
-
-Runtime equivalent for scripted checks:
-
-```bash
-OMK_THINKING=xhigh omk chat --provider <provider> --model <model>
-```
-
-## Behavior
-
-- `/think` and `/think next` cycle to the next supported level for the active provider/model.
-- `/think xhigh` pins the session to an explicit high-reasoning variant when supported.
-- `/think variant <name>` uses a provider-specific model variant name after OMK normalization.
-- `/thinking` is an alias for `/think`.
-
-## Rules
-
-- Do not print hidden chain-of-thought; report concise reasoning summaries and evidence instead.
-- Do not expose prompts, API keys, tokens, cookies, or raw provider traces.
-- If a provider does not support the requested level, use `/model` or `/help` to inspect available routing and choose the closest supported level.
-- Keep the final answer evidence-gated: changed files, commands run, failures, and risks.