omnilane 0.12.0 → 0.13.0

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -6,6 +6,40 @@ semantic version tags.
 
 ## [Unreleased]
 
+## [0.13.0] - 2026-08-03
+
+### Changed
+
+- `long-context` now orders on AA-LCR, Artificial Analysis's long-context
+  reasoning benchmark, which scores exactly this lane's work: extracting and
+  synthesising across long-form documents. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads both fallbacks
+  there, so first place is now positively justified rather than merely
+  unrevisited. The two fallbacks swapped — GPT-5.6 Sol at `high` precedes
+  Claude Opus 5 at `high`.
+- Corrected the advice this lane used to give. It sent multi-hop synthesis to
+  the Claude candidate on the strength of second-hand figures for a prior model
+  generation; on first-party current-generation data Claude is the weakest of
+  the three shipped candidates, not the strongest. The claim is gone from
+  `routing.yaml` and from all five lane tables.
+
+### Added
+
+- `release-audit --require-tag` now reports whether recently pushed tags have a
+  matching GitHub release. v0.11.0 shipped a tag with no release and nothing
+  noticed for a week. The check warns rather than fails, skips silently when
+  `gh` is absent, unauthenticated or offline so the audit still works in CI,
+  excludes the target being released (whose release does not exist yet at audit
+  time), and looks only at the few most recent tags — a check that stays yellow
+  forever is one everyone learns to ignore.
+
+### Notes
+
+- AA-LCR runs on documents of 10k-100k tokens, so it settles synthesis quality
+  across long documents and settles nothing at a full 1M. GPT-5.6 Luna tops
+  that table at a fraction of the cost and was deliberately *not* promoted:
+  this lane's headline case is the 1M sweep, which the benchmark does not
+  reach. See `docs/model-capabilities-2026-07.md`.
+
 ## [0.12.0] - 2026-08-03
 
 ### Changed
@@ -529,7 +563,8 @@ work to the wrong model, and records the evidence behind the shipped defaults.
 - Initial shared routing table, cross-vendor dispatcher, runners, installer,
   and baseline lint fixes.
 
-[Unreleased]: https://github.com/Seraphim0916/omnilane/compare/v0.12.0...HEAD
+[Unreleased]: https://github.com/Seraphim0916/omnilane/compare/v0.13.0...HEAD
+[0.13.0]: https://github.com/Seraphim0916/omnilane/compare/v0.12.0...v0.13.0
 [0.12.0]: https://github.com/Seraphim0916/omnilane/compare/v0.11.0...v0.12.0
 [0.11.0]: https://github.com/Seraphim0916/omnilane/compare/v0.10.4...v0.11.0
 [0.10.4]: https://github.com/Seraphim0916/omnilane/compare/v0.10.3...v0.10.4

package/README.ja.md

@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | ✒️ taste-final | Claude Opus 5 (high) | GPT-5.6 Sol (max) | 対外文章、prompt/ドキュメント推敲、スタイル最終審 |
 | 💬 consult | 明示指定したベンダー/モデル | —(フォールバックなし) | 自然言語で直接相談。`--vendor` を必ず維持 |
 | 🎨 ui-draft | GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) | Claude Opus 5 (high) | デザインシステム/参考画像がある場合の UI ドラフト |
-| 📚 long-context | Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) | Claude Opus 5 (high) | 100 万トークン級の走査と検索。複数箇所をまたぐ統合には Claude 候補を、高速反復ループは Flash を優先 |
+| 📚 long-context | Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) | GPT-5.6 Sol (high) | 100 万トークン級の走査・検索と、長文をまたぐ統合。高速反復ループは Flash を優先 |
 | ⚡ fast-agentic | GPT-5.6 Luna (max) | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | 高速なマルチステップ agentic ループ、マルチモーダル確認 |
 | 📡 live-search | Grok 4.5 | —(off) | リアルタイム X/ウェブ検索とソーシャル文脈 |
 | 🚰 coding-overflow | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 → Qwen3 Coder Plus → OpenCode | Codex クォータ逼迫時の中級コーディング逃し弁 |
@@ -516,6 +516,23 @@ scripts/dispatch.sh --dry-run hardest-coding "…"   # 解決済みプラン、
 
 ## 📜 リリース履歴
 
+## v0.13.0 の新機能
+
+- **`long-context` を AA-LCR で順序付け** — Artificial Analysis の長文脈推論
+  ベンチマークで、まさにこのレーンの仕事を測るものです。Gemini 3.1 Pro が両方の
+  フォールバックを上回るため、その一番手は「未見直し」から「根拠あり」に変わりました。
+- **このレーンの旧来の助言は逆で、削除しました。** 従来は多段の統合を Claude 候補へ
+  回すよう促していましたが、根拠は前世代モデルの二次情報でした。一次情報の現行世代
+  データでは Claude が三候補中もっとも弱く、フォールバックを入れ替えて GPT-5.6 Sol
+  (high) が Claude Opus 5 (high) の前に来ます。
+- **`release-audit --require-tag` が GitHub リリースのないタグを指摘します。** 失敗
+  ではなく警告で、`gh` が無い場合やオフラインではスキップするため CI でも動作し、
+  直近のタグのみを見ます。
+- **範囲の注記:** AA-LCR は 10k〜100k トークンの文書で実施されるため、長文の統合品質
+  は決まりますが 1M での挙動は何も決まりません。GPT-5.6 Luna は同表の首位でしかも
+  はるかに安価ですが、**意図的に昇格させていません** — このレーンの本命は 1M の走査で、
+  ベンチマークがそこまで届かないからです。
+
 ## v0.12.0 の新機能
 
 - **`hardest-coding` の Sol を `max` から `xhigh` へ** — AA の努力度別 Coding Index

package/README.ko.md

@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | ✒️ taste-final | Claude Opus 5 (high) | GPT-5.6 Sol (max) | 대외 문장, prompt/문서 다듬기, 스타일 최종심 |
 | 💬 consult | 명시적으로 지정한 벤더/모델 | —(폴백 없음) | 자연어 직접 상담. `--vendor` 를 반드시 유지 |
 | 🎨 ui-draft | GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) | Claude Opus 5 (high) | 디자인 시스템/참고 이미지가 있을 때의 UI 초안 |
-| 📚 long-context | Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) | Claude Opus 5 (high) | 100만 토큰급 훑기와 검색. 여러 곳을 잇는 다중 홉 통합은 Claude 후보를, 빠른 반복 루프는 Flash 우선 |
+| 📚 long-context | Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) | GPT-5.6 Sol (high) | 100만 토큰급 훑기·검색과 긴 문서를 잇는 통합. 빠른 반복 루프는 Flash 우선 |
 | ⚡ fast-agentic | GPT-5.6 Luna (max) | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | 빠른 멀티스텝 agentic 루프, 멀티모달 확인 |
 | 📡 live-search | Grok 4.5 | —(off) | 실시간 X/웹 검색과 소셜 맥락 |
 | 🚰 coding-overflow | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 → Qwen3 Coder Plus → OpenCode | Codex 쿼터 소진 시 중급 코딩 안전 밸브 |
@@ -499,6 +499,23 @@ scripts/dispatch.sh --dry-run hardest-coding "…"   # 완전히 해석된 계
 
 ## 📜 릴리스 기록
 
+## v0.13.0 새 기능
+
+- **`long-context` 를 AA-LCR 기준으로 정렬** — Artificial Analysis 의 장문맥 추론
+  벤치마크로, 바로 이 레인의 일을 측정합니다. Gemini 3.1 Pro 가 두 폴백을 모두
+  앞서므로 1순위가 "미검토" 에서 "근거 있음" 으로 바뀌었습니다.
+- **이 레인의 기존 조언은 반대였고 제거했습니다.** 예전에는 다중 홉 통합을 Claude
+  후보로 보내라고 했지만 근거는 이전 세대 모델의 2차 자료였습니다. 1차 현세대
+  데이터에서는 Claude 가 세 후보 중 가장 약해, 폴백을 바꿔 GPT-5.6 Sol (high) 가
+  Claude Opus 5 (high) 앞에 옵니다.
+- **`release-audit --require-tag` 가 GitHub 릴리스 없는 태그를 표시합니다.** 실패가
+  아니라 경고이며, `gh` 가 없거나 오프라인이면 건너뛰어 CI 에서도 동작하고, 최근
+  태그만 봅니다.
+- **범위 참고:** AA-LCR 은 10k~100k 토큰 문서로 수행되므로 긴 문서 통합 품질은
+  가려지지만 1M 에서의 동작은 전혀 가려지지 않습니다. GPT-5.6 Luna 가 이 표의
+  1위이고 훨씬 저렴하지만 **의도적으로 승격하지 않았습니다** — 이 레인의 본령은
+  벤치마크가 닿지 않는 1M 훑기이기 때문입니다.
+
 ## v0.12.0 새 기능
 
 - **`hardest-coding`의 Sol을 `max`에서 `xhigh`로** — AA의 노력 수준별 Coding Index

package/README.md

@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ actually resolves.
 | ✒️ taste-final | Claude Opus 5 (high) | GPT-5.6 Sol (max) | User-facing prose, prompt/doc polish, style arbitration |
 | 💬 consult | Explicit named vendor/model | — (no fallback) | Direct natural-language consultation; always keep `--vendor` |
 | 🎨 ui-draft | GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) | Claude Opus 5 (high) | UI drafts only WITH a design system / reference images |
-| 📚 long-context | Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) | Claude Opus 5 (high) | 1M-token sweeps and retrieval; for multi-hop synthesis prefer the Claude candidate, and Flash for fast repeated loops |
+| 📚 long-context | Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) | GPT-5.6 Sol (high) | 1M-token sweeps, retrieval, and synthesis across long documents; Flash for fast repeated loops |
 | ⚡ fast-agentic | GPT-5.6 Luna (max) | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | Fast multi-step agentic loops, multimodal checks |
 | 📡 live-search | Grok 4.5 | — (off) | Realtime X/web search and social context |
 | 🚰 coding-overflow | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 → Qwen3 Coder Plus → OpenCode | Codex-quota relief valve for mid-tier coding |
@@ -547,6 +547,25 @@ working notes, including per-benchmark caveats, live in
 
 ## 📜 Release history
 
+## What's new in v0.13.0
+
+- **`long-context` is ordered on AA-LCR** — Artificial Analysis's long-context
+  reasoning benchmark, which scores exactly this lane's work. Gemini 3.1 Pro
+  leads both fallbacks there, so its first place is now positively justified
+  rather than merely unrevisited.
+- **The lane's old advice was backwards and is gone.** It used to send
+  multi-hop synthesis to the Claude candidate on second-hand figures for a
+  prior model generation; on first-party current-generation data Claude is the
+  weakest of the three shipped candidates. The fallbacks swapped, so GPT-5.6
+  Sol (high) now precedes Claude Opus 5 (high).
+- **`release-audit --require-tag` flags tags with no GitHub release.** It warns
+  rather than fails, skips when `gh` is absent or offline so the audit still
+  runs in CI, and looks only at recent tags.
+- **Scope note:** AA-LCR runs on 10k-100k-token documents, so it settles
+  synthesis across long documents and nothing at a full 1M. GPT-5.6 Luna tops
+  that table far more cheaply and was deliberately *not* promoted, because this
+  lane exists for the 1M sweep the benchmark does not reach.
+
 ## What's new in v0.12.0
 
 - **`hardest-coding` drops Sol from `max` to `xhigh`** — on AA's per-effort

package/README.zh-CN.md

@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | ✒️ taste-final | Claude Opus 5 (high) | GPT-5.6 Sol (max) | 对外文字、prompt 与文档打磨、风格终审 |
 | 💬 consult | 明确指定的厂商/模型 | —(不降级) | 自然语言直接咨询;必须保留 `--vendor` |
 | 🎨 ui-draft | GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) | Claude Opus 5 (high) | 有设计规范/参考图时的 UI 出稿;开放式视觉品味交给 taste-final |
-| 📚 long-context | Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) | Claude Opus 5 (high) | 百万 token 扫读与检索;要跨段落多跳整合请改用 Claude 候选,高速重复循环仍优先 Flash |
+| 📚 long-context | Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) | GPT-5.6 Sol (high) | 百万 token 扫读、检索与长文跨段整合;高速重复循环仍优先 Flash |
 | ⚡ fast-agentic | GPT-5.6 Luna (max) | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | 快速多步骤 agentic 循环、多模态检查 |
 | 📡 live-search | Grok 4.5 | —(off) | 实时 X/网络搜索与社群脉络 |
 | 🚰 coding-overflow | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 → Qwen3 Coder Plus → OpenCode | Codex 额度吃紧时的中量级编码溢流道;事实性声明须另行查证 |
@@ -473,6 +473,20 @@ vendor 一律当成 `work`,而且它只能逐次明确指定,永远不是 lane
 
 ## 📜 版本历程
 
+## v0.13.0 新功能
+
+- **`long-context` 改用 AA-LCR 排序**——那是 Artificial Analysis 的长脉络推理基准,
+  量的正是这条通道的工作。Gemini 3.1 Pro 在该榜领先两个备援,因此它的第一顺位
+  从「未复审」升格为「有据」。
+- **这条通道原本的建议是反的,已移除。** 它原先要人把多跳整合改派给 Claude 候选,
+  依据是上一代模型的二手数字;以第一手当代数据看,Claude 反而是三个候选里最弱的。
+  备援因此换位,GPT-5.6 Sol (high) 排在 Claude Opus 5 (high) 前面。
+- **`release-audit --require-tag` 会标出没有 GitHub release 的 tag。** 只警告不中断,
+  `gh` 缺席或离线时自动跳过(CI 仍可跑),且只看最近几个 tag。
+- **范围注记:** AA-LCR 测的是 10k–100k token 的文件,所以它能定「长文整合谁强」,
+  定不了 1M 的行为。GPT-5.6 Luna 在该榜居首且便宜得多,**刻意不升**——这条通道的
+  招牌工作是 1M 扫读,而该基准涵盖不到。
+
 ## v0.12.0 新功能
 
 - **`hardest-coding` 的 Sol 从 `max` 降到 `xhigh`**——在 AA 分档位的 Coding Index

package/README.zh-TW.md

@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ flowchart LR
 | ✒️ taste-final | Claude Opus 5 (high) | GPT-5.6 Sol (max) | 對外文字、prompt 與文件打磨、風格終審 |
 | 💬 consult | 明確點名的廠商/模型 | —(不降級) | 自然語言直接諮詢;必須保留 `--vendor` |
 | 🎨 ui-draft | GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) | Claude Opus 5 (high) | 有設計規範/參考圖時的 UI 出稿;開放式視覺品味交給 taste-final |
-| 📚 long-context | Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) | Claude Opus 5 (high) | 百萬 token 掃讀與檢索;要跨段落多跳整合請改用 Claude 候選,高速重複迴圈仍優先 Flash |
+| 📚 long-context | Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) | GPT-5.6 Sol (high) | 百萬 token 掃讀、檢索與長文跨段整合;高速重複迴圈仍優先 Flash |
 | ⚡ fast-agentic | GPT-5.6 Luna (max) | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | 快速多步驟 agentic 迴圈、多模態檢查 |
 | 📡 live-search | Grok 4.5 | —(off) | 即時 X/網路搜尋與社群脈絡 |
 | 🚰 coding-overflow | Grok 4.5 | Kimi K3 → Qwen3 Coder Plus → OpenCode | Codex 額度吃緊時的中量級編碼溢流道;事實性宣稱須另行查證 |
@@ -483,6 +483,20 @@ vendor 一律當成 `work`,而且它只能逐次明確指定,永遠不是 lane
 
 ## 📜 版本歷程
 
+## v0.13.0 新功能
+
+- **`long-context` 改用 AA-LCR 排序**——那是 Artificial Analysis 的長脈絡推理基準,
+  量的正是這條通道的工作。Gemini 3.1 Pro 在該榜領先兩個備援,因此它的第一順位
+  從「未複審」升格為「有據」。
+- **這條通道原本的建議是反的,已移除。** 它原先要人把多跳整合改派給 Claude 候選,
+  依據是上一代模型的二手數字;以第一手當代數據看,Claude 反而是三個候選裡最弱的。
+  備援因此換位,GPT-5.6 Sol (high) 排在 Claude Opus 5 (high) 前面。
+- **`release-audit --require-tag` 會標出沒有 GitHub release 的 tag。** 只警告不中斷,
+  `gh` 缺席或離線時自動跳過(CI 仍可跑),且只看最近幾個 tag。
+- **範圍註記:** AA-LCR 測的是 10k–100k token 的文件,所以它能定「長文整合誰強」,
+  定不了 1M 的行為。GPT-5.6 Luna 在該榜居首且便宜得多,**刻意不升**——這條通道的
+  招牌工作是 1M 掃讀,而該基準涵蓋不到。
+
 ## v0.12.0 新功能
 
 - **`hardest-coding` 的 Sol 從 `max` 降到 `xhigh`**——在 AA 分檔位的 Coding Index

package/VERSION

@@ -1 +1 @@
-0.12.0
+0.13.0

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "omnilane",
-  "version": "0.12.0",
+  "version": "0.13.0",
   "description": "One routing table, every harness — classify subtasks into lanes and dispatch each lane to the best vendor's agentic CLI (Codex, Claude, Gemini, Grok) using your existing subscription logins.",
   "bin": {
     "omnilane": "bin/omnilane"

package/routing.yaml

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ hard-judgment:   claude claude-opus-5 xhigh | codex gpt-5.6-sol max   # ordered
 taste-final:     claude claude-opus-5 high | codex gpt-5.6-sol max    # user-facing prose, prompt/doc polish, Chinese phrasing, style arbitration
 consult:         codex gpt-5.6-sol max | claude claude-opus-5 high | grok grok-4.5 - | gemini "Gemini 3.1 Pro (High)" -  # direct named-model consultation; use --vendor to prevent fallback
 ui-draft:        codex gpt-5.6-sol xhigh | claude claude-opus-5 high  # only with a design system / reference images; open-ended visual taste -> taste-final
-long-context:    gemini "Gemini 3.1 Pro (High)" - | claude claude-opus-5 high | codex gpt-5.6-sol high  # all have 1M context; Gemini leads single-needle retrieval at full length and is the cheapest way to sweep volume, Flash for fast loops. For multi-hop synthesis across a large corpus prefer the claude candidate: published multi-needle scores at 1M favour Claude by a wide margin (see docs/model-capabilities-2026-07.md)
+long-context:    gemini "Gemini 3.1 Pro (High)" - | codex gpt-5.6-sol high | claude claude-opus-5 high  # all have 1M context; ordered on AA-LCR, which scores exactly this lane's work — extracting and synthesising across long documents — and where Gemini leads both fallbacks. Corrected 2026-08-03: this comment used to send multi-hop synthesis to the Claude candidate on second-hand prior-generation figures, and current first-party per-effort data reverses that, so the two fallbacks swapped. Caveat in docs: AA-LCR runs at 10k-100k tokens, so nothing here settles behaviour at a full 1M
 fast-agentic:    codex gpt-5.6-luna max | gemini "Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)" -  # fast multi-step tool loops. Reordered 2026-08-03: Luna leads Flash on agentic benchmarks AND costs a fraction as much per task, so Flash's remaining edge is raw throughput alone. Keep Flash first only if your loops are latency-bound. Both take image input, so the lane's multimodal checks are unaffected
 live-search:     grok grok-4.5 - | off          # native X/web search lane; no real substitute
 coding-overflow: grok grok-4.5 - | kimi kimi-k3 - | qwen qwen3-coder-plus - | opencode - - | off  # codex-quota relief valve: mid-tier coding; Grok 4.5 is a capable mid-tier coder but AA measures a high hallucination rate — verify every factual claim it ships. qwen3-coder-plus = 2025-09-23 snapshot alias (Qwen 3.6 Plus exists; re-evaluate before swapping). kimi/qwen model fields are CLI aliases — adjust to your login. opencode "-" model = its own configured default.

package/scripts/release-audit.sh

@@ -285,6 +285,43 @@ if [[ "$require_tag" -eq 1 ]]; then
   else
     fail annotated-release-tag
   fi
+
+  # A pushed tag with no GitHub release is invisible to anyone browsing the
+  # releases page, and nothing else in this audit notices: v0.11.0 sat that way
+  # for a week. Warn rather than fail — this audit must work offline and in CI,
+  # and the target's own release legitimately does not exist yet at audit time,
+  # so the target tag is excluded and only older tags are checked.
+  release_gap_checked=0
+  if command -v gh >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
+    git -C "$ROOT" remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null | grep -q 'github\.com' &&
+    gh auth status >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+    remote_tags="$(git -C "$ROOT" ls-remote --tags origin 2>/dev/null |
+      grep -v '\^{}$' | sed -n 's#.*refs/tags/##p' | sort -u)"
+    if [[ -n "$remote_tags" ]]; then
+      released_tags="$(gh release list --limit 200 --json tagName --jq '.[].tagName' 2>/dev/null || true)"
+      if [[ -n "$released_tags" ]]; then
+        release_gap_checked=1
+        missing_releases=""
+        # Only the few most recent tags. Older gaps are real but historical, and
+        # a check that stays yellow forever is a check everyone learns to ignore;
+        # this one exists to catch the release you just forgot.
+        while IFS= read -r remote_tag; do
+          [[ -n "$remote_tag" ]] || continue
+          [[ "$remote_tag" == "v$target" ]] && continue
+          printf '%s\n' "$remote_tags" | grep -Fxq "$remote_tag" || continue
+          if ! printf '%s\n' "$released_tags" | grep -Fxq "$remote_tag"; then
+            missing_releases="$missing_releases $remote_tag"
+          fi
+        done <<<"$(git -C "$ROOT" tag -l --sort=-creatordate | head -6)"
+        if [[ -n "$missing_releases" ]]; then
+          warn "github-release-missing:${missing_releases# }"
+        else
+          pass github-release-coverage
+        fi
+      fi
+    fi
+  fi
+  [[ "$release_gap_checked" -eq 1 ]] || warn github-release-check-skipped
 else
   warn release-tag-not-required
 fi