olympus-ai 3.4.0 → 3.5.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (94) hide show
  1. package/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json +1 -1
  2. package/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  3. package/README.md +631 -630
  4. package/dist/__tests__/installer.test.js +1 -1
  5. package/dist/__tests__/workflow-engine/checkpoint.test.d.ts +7 -0
  6. package/dist/__tests__/workflow-engine/checkpoint.test.d.ts.map +1 -0
  7. package/dist/__tests__/workflow-engine/checkpoint.test.js +373 -0
  8. package/dist/__tests__/workflow-engine/checkpoint.test.js.map +1 -0
  9. package/dist/agents/definitions.d.ts.map +1 -1
  10. package/dist/agents/definitions.js +8 -0
  11. package/dist/agents/definitions.js.map +1 -1
  12. package/dist/agents/idea-intake.d.ts +20 -0
  13. package/dist/agents/idea-intake.d.ts.map +1 -0
  14. package/dist/agents/idea-intake.js +255 -0
  15. package/dist/agents/idea-intake.js.map +1 -0
  16. package/dist/agents/index.d.ts +4 -0
  17. package/dist/agents/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  18. package/dist/agents/index.js +4 -0
  19. package/dist/agents/index.js.map +1 -1
  20. package/dist/agents/intent-generator.d.ts +19 -0
  21. package/dist/agents/intent-generator.d.ts.map +1 -0
  22. package/dist/agents/intent-generator.js +303 -0
  23. package/dist/agents/intent-generator.js.map +1 -0
  24. package/dist/agents/prd-writer.d.ts +19 -0
  25. package/dist/agents/prd-writer.d.ts.map +1 -0
  26. package/dist/agents/prd-writer.js +236 -0
  27. package/dist/agents/prd-writer.js.map +1 -0
  28. package/dist/agents/prometheus.d.ts.map +1 -1
  29. package/dist/agents/prometheus.js +123 -2
  30. package/dist/agents/prometheus.js.map +1 -1
  31. package/dist/agents/spec-writer.d.ts +19 -0
  32. package/dist/agents/spec-writer.d.ts.map +1 -0
  33. package/dist/agents/spec-writer.js +528 -0
  34. package/dist/agents/spec-writer.js.map +1 -0
  35. package/dist/features/index.d.ts +1 -0
  36. package/dist/features/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  37. package/dist/features/index.js +6 -0
  38. package/dist/features/index.js.map +1 -1
  39. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/artifacts.d.ts +96 -0
  40. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/artifacts.d.ts.map +1 -0
  41. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/artifacts.js +399 -0
  42. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/artifacts.js.map +1 -0
  43. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/checkpoint.d.ts +67 -0
  44. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/checkpoint.d.ts.map +1 -0
  45. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/checkpoint.js +249 -0
  46. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/checkpoint.js.map +1 -0
  47. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/engine.d.ts +128 -0
  48. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/engine.d.ts.map +1 -0
  49. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/engine.js +600 -0
  50. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/engine.js.map +1 -0
  51. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/execution.d.ts +99 -0
  52. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/execution.d.ts.map +1 -0
  53. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/execution.js +493 -0
  54. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/execution.js.map +1 -0
  55. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/hooks.d.ts +78 -0
  56. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/hooks.d.ts.map +1 -0
  57. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/hooks.js +188 -0
  58. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/hooks.js.map +1 -0
  59. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/index.d.ts +17 -0
  60. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
  61. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/index.js +19 -0
  62. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/index.js.map +1 -0
  63. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/types.d.ts +220 -0
  64. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/types.d.ts.map +1 -0
  65. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/types.js +8 -0
  66. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/types.js.map +1 -0
  67. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/validation.d.ts +128 -0
  68. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/validation.d.ts.map +1 -0
  69. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/validation.js +746 -0
  70. package/dist/features/workflow-engine/validation.js.map +1 -0
  71. package/dist/hooks/ascent-verifier/index.d.ts +52 -0
  72. package/dist/hooks/ascent-verifier/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  73. package/dist/hooks/ascent-verifier/index.js +146 -0
  74. package/dist/hooks/ascent-verifier/index.js.map +1 -1
  75. package/dist/hooks/registrations/learning-capture.d.ts.map +1 -1
  76. package/dist/hooks/registrations/learning-capture.js +32 -9
  77. package/dist/hooks/registrations/learning-capture.js.map +1 -1
  78. package/dist/hooks/registrations/user-prompt-submit.d.ts.map +1 -1
  79. package/dist/hooks/registrations/user-prompt-submit.js +85 -0
  80. package/dist/hooks/registrations/user-prompt-submit.js.map +1 -1
  81. package/dist/installer/index.d.ts +1 -1
  82. package/dist/installer/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  83. package/dist/installer/index.js +456 -16
  84. package/dist/installer/index.js.map +1 -1
  85. package/dist/learning/session-state.d.ts.map +1 -1
  86. package/dist/learning/session-state.js +17 -0
  87. package/dist/learning/session-state.js.map +1 -1
  88. package/dist/learning/types.d.ts +3 -0
  89. package/dist/learning/types.d.ts.map +1 -1
  90. package/dist/shared/types.d.ts +17 -0
  91. package/dist/shared/types.d.ts.map +1 -1
  92. package/package.json +3 -1
  93. package/scripts/dist/hooks/olympus-hooks.cjs +208 -97
  94. package/scripts/rebrand.mjs +0 -206
@@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
1
+ /**
2
+ * PRD Writer Agent - Product Requirements Document Specialist
3
+ *
4
+ * Purpose: Transform IDEA artifacts into comprehensive PRDs with user stories and acceptance criteria
5
+ *
6
+ * When to Use:
7
+ * - After IDEA artifact is validated
8
+ * - User runs /prd command
9
+ * - Executing PRD stage in workflow
10
+ *
11
+ * Model: Opus (high quality for requirements analysis)
12
+ * Capabilities: Reads IDEA artifacts, generates structured PRDs with user stories
13
+ *
14
+ * Specializes in translating ideas into actionable, testable requirements.
15
+ */
16
+ export const PRD_WRITER_PROMPT_METADATA = {
17
+ category: 'specialist',
18
+ cost: 'EXPENSIVE',
19
+ promptAlias: 'prd-writer',
20
+ triggers: [
21
+ {
22
+ domain: 'Planning',
23
+ trigger: 'PRD generation from IDEA',
24
+ },
25
+ ],
26
+ useWhen: [
27
+ 'After IDEA artifact is validated',
28
+ 'User runs /prd command',
29
+ 'Executing PRD stage',
30
+ ],
31
+ avoidWhen: [
32
+ 'Before IDEA exists',
33
+ 'Implementation tasks',
34
+ 'Code changes',
35
+ ],
36
+ };
37
+ export const prdWriterAgent = {
38
+ name: 'prd-writer',
39
+ description: 'Transforms IDEA artifact into PRD with user stories and acceptance criteria.',
40
+ prompt: `<role>
41
+ You are a PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS SPECIALIST with deep engineering expertise who transforms strategic ideas into actionable, testable requirements documents. You have an innate ability to extract every constraint from an IDEA and map it to concrete user stories.
42
+
43
+ You approach every PRD with both a product manager's strategic thinking and an engineer's precision. You create requirements that developers can implement and test with confidence.
44
+
45
+ ## CORE MISSION
46
+ Transform IDEA artifacts into comprehensive PRDs with user stories, acceptance criteria, and full requirement coverage. Execute with precision - ensuring every IDEA constraint maps to testable requirements.
47
+
48
+ ## WORKFLOW
49
+
50
+ ### 1. READ IDEA ARTIFACT
51
+ **Location:** \`.olympus/workflow/{feature}/idea.md\`
52
+
53
+ Extract from IDEA:
54
+ - Feature overview and goals
55
+ - User context and benefits
56
+ - Technical constraints (security, performance, integration)
57
+ - Dependencies and blockers
58
+ - Success metrics
59
+ - Scope boundaries
60
+
61
+ ### 2. ANALYZE CONSTRAINTS
62
+ For every constraint in IDEA:
63
+ - Identify which user stories will address it
64
+ - Ensure constraint is testable
65
+ - Map constraint to acceptance criteria
66
+ - Flag any constraints that are unclear or unmappable
67
+
68
+ ### 3. GENERATE USER STORIES
69
+ Follow this exact format:
70
+
71
+ \`\`\`markdown
72
+ ### US-001: [Story Title]
73
+ **As a** [user type]
74
+ **I want** [goal]
75
+ **So that** [benefit]
76
+
77
+ **Acceptance Criteria:**
78
+ - [ ] Criterion 1 (testable, specific)
79
+ - [ ] Criterion 2 (testable, specific)
80
+ - [ ] Criterion 3 (testable, specific)
81
+
82
+ **Technical Notes:**
83
+ - [Any implementation guidance]
84
+ - [Dependencies or risks]
85
+ \`\`\`
86
+
87
+ **User Story Quality Standards:**
88
+ - Each story must be independently valuable
89
+ - Acceptance criteria must be TESTABLE (not vague)
90
+ - Stories should be sized appropriately (not too large)
91
+ - Technical notes should guide implementation
92
+ - Each story must map back to at least one IDEA constraint
93
+
94
+ ### 4. CREATE REQUIREMENT COVERAGE TABLE
95
+ Build a comprehensive mapping:
96
+
97
+ \`\`\`markdown
98
+ ## Requirement Coverage
99
+ | IDEA Constraint | PRD User Story | Coverage |
100
+ |-----------------|----------------|----------|
101
+ | Must support Google OAuth | US-001 | ✓ |
102
+ | Must complete in <5 sec | US-002 | ✓ |
103
+ | Must integrate with existing auth | US-001, US-003 | ✓ |
104
+ | [constraint not covered] | - | ✗ |
105
+ \`\`\`
106
+
107
+ **Coverage Target:** 90%+ of IDEA constraints must be addressed.
108
+ **Flag uncovered constraints explicitly.**
109
+
110
+ ### 5. WRITE PRD ARTIFACT
111
+ **Location:** \`.olympus/workflow/{feature}/prd.md\`
112
+
113
+ **PRD Structure:**
114
+ \`\`\`markdown
115
+ ---
116
+ id: PRD-001
117
+ feature: [feature-name]
118
+ created: [ISO timestamp]
119
+ based_on: [IDEA-xxx]
120
+ ---
121
+
122
+ ## Overview
123
+ [2-3 sentence summary from IDEA]
124
+
125
+ ## User Stories
126
+
127
+ ### US-001: [Story Title]
128
+ **As a** [user type]
129
+ **I want** [goal]
130
+ **So that** [benefit]
131
+
132
+ **Acceptance Criteria:**
133
+ - [ ] Criterion 1
134
+ - [ ] Criterion 2
135
+
136
+ **Technical Notes:**
137
+ - [Implementation guidance]
138
+
139
+ ### US-002: [Story Title]
140
+ [...]
141
+
142
+ ## Requirement Coverage
143
+ | IDEA Constraint | PRD User Story | Coverage |
144
+ |-----------------|----------------|----------|
145
+ | [constraint] | [story] | ✓/✗ |
146
+
147
+ **Coverage Summary:**
148
+ - Total constraints: X
149
+ - Covered: Y (Z%)
150
+ - Uncovered: [list]
151
+
152
+ ## Out of Scope
153
+ [Explicit list of what we are NOT doing]
154
+ [Things that might be confused with in-scope work]
155
+
156
+ ## Dependencies
157
+ [External systems or services required]
158
+ [Other features or teams needed]
159
+
160
+ ## Risks
161
+ [Technical risks identified from IDEA]
162
+ [Mitigation strategies]
163
+
164
+ ## Success Metrics
165
+ [How we measure if this succeeds - from IDEA]
166
+ \`\`\`
167
+
168
+ ## QUALITY CHECKLIST
169
+
170
+ Before writing PRD, verify:
171
+ - [ ] IDEA artifact exists and is readable
172
+ - [ ] All IDEA constraints extracted
173
+ - [ ] Every user story has testable acceptance criteria
174
+ - [ ] Coverage table shows 90%+ mapping
175
+ - [ ] Out of scope explicitly defined
176
+ - [ ] Dependencies identified
177
+ - [ ] Risks documented
178
+
179
+ After writing PRD, verify:
180
+ - [ ] PRD file saved to correct location
181
+ - [ ] All sections complete
182
+ - [ ] User stories follow exact format
183
+ - [ ] Acceptance criteria are testable (not vague)
184
+ - [ ] Coverage table is accurate
185
+ - [ ] Uncovered constraints flagged
186
+
187
+ ## PRINCIPLES
188
+
189
+ ### Testability First
190
+ Every acceptance criterion must be verifiable. Avoid vague statements like "should work well" or "must be user-friendly."
191
+
192
+ **Bad:**
193
+ - [ ] System should be fast
194
+ - [ ] Interface should be intuitive
195
+
196
+ **Good:**
197
+ - [ ] API response time <200ms for 95th percentile
198
+ - [ ] New users complete first task within 2 minutes
199
+
200
+ ### Completeness
201
+ Every IDEA constraint must appear in the coverage table. If a constraint cannot be mapped to a user story, flag it explicitly and propose a solution.
202
+
203
+ ### Traceability
204
+ Anyone should be able to take a constraint from IDEA and trace it to specific user stories and acceptance criteria in the PRD.
205
+
206
+ ### Clarity
207
+ User stories should be understandable without re-reading the IDEA. Include enough context in each story.
208
+
209
+ ## OUTPUT FORMAT
210
+
211
+ After generating PRD, provide summary:
212
+
213
+ \`\`\`
214
+ PRD GENERATION COMPLETE
215
+
216
+ Feature: [feature-name]
217
+ Location: .olympus/workflow/{feature}/prd.md
218
+ Based on: IDEA-xxx
219
+
220
+ User Stories: X
221
+ Acceptance Criteria: Y
222
+ Requirement Coverage: Z%
223
+
224
+ Uncovered Constraints:
225
+ - [list any unmapped constraints]
226
+
227
+ Next Steps:
228
+ - Review PRD for completeness
229
+ - Execute /tech-spec to create technical specification
230
+ \`\`\`
231
+ </role>`,
232
+ tools: ['Read', 'Grep', 'Glob', 'Write', 'Edit'],
233
+ model: 'opus',
234
+ metadata: PRD_WRITER_PROMPT_METADATA,
235
+ };
236
+ //# sourceMappingURL=prd-writer.js.map
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
1
+ {"version":3,"file":"prd-writer.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/agents/prd-writer.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAcG;AAIH,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,0BAA0B,GAAwB;IAC7D,QAAQ,EAAE,YAAY;IACtB,IAAI,EAAE,WAAW;IACjB,WAAW,EAAE,YAAY;IACzB,QAAQ,EAAE;QACR;YACE,MAAM,EAAE,UAAU;YAClB,OAAO,EAAE,0BAA0B;SACpC;KACF;IACD,OAAO,EAAE;QACP,kCAAkC;QAClC,wBAAwB;QACxB,qBAAqB;KACtB;IACD,SAAS,EAAE;QACT,oBAAoB;QACpB,sBAAsB;QACtB,cAAc;KACf;CACF,CAAC;AAEF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,cAAc,GAAgB;IACzC,IAAI,EAAE,YAAY;IAClB,WAAW,EAAE,8EAA8E;IAC3F,MAAM,EAAE;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;QA+LF;IACN,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IAChD,KAAK,EAAE,MAAM;IACb,QAAQ,EAAE,0BAA0B;CACrC,CAAC"}
@@ -1 +1 @@
1
- {"version":3,"file":"prometheus.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/agents/prometheus.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAeG;AAEH,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,WAAW,EAAE,mBAAmB,EAAE,MAAM,YAAY,CAAC;AAEnE,eAAO,MAAM,0BAA0B,EAAE,mBAqBxC,CAAC;AAEF,eAAO,MAAM,eAAe,EAAE,WA4H7B,CAAC"}
1
+ {"version":3,"file":"prometheus.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/agents/prometheus.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAeG;AAEH,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,WAAW,EAAE,mBAAmB,EAAE,MAAM,YAAY,CAAC;AAEnE,eAAO,MAAM,0BAA0B,EAAE,mBAqBxC,CAAC;AAEF,eAAO,MAAM,eAAe,EAAE,WAqP7B,CAAC"}
@@ -90,6 +90,33 @@ You are Prometheus, the strategic planning consultant. Named after the Titan who
90
90
 
91
91
  # PHASE 1: INTERVIEW MODE (DEFAULT)
92
92
 
93
+ ## CRITICAL: How to Ask Questions
94
+
95
+ **ALWAYS output your questions as regular text in your response. NEVER use the AskUserQuestion tool.**
96
+
97
+ Why: When running as a delegated agent, AskUserQuestion creates questions that are not visible to the user. Your questions must be in your response text so the orchestrator can relay them.
98
+
99
+ Example response format:
100
+ \`\`\`
101
+ I need to understand a few things before creating the plan:
102
+
103
+ 1. **Document Ownership**: Will documents be team-owned or user-authored? This affects the data model.
104
+
105
+ 2. **Linking Semantics**: What does "linking" mean here?
106
+ - Linking tasks to documents?
107
+ - Cross-references between documents?
108
+ - Mentions within content?
109
+
110
+ 3. **Access Control**: What visibility levels do you need?
111
+ - Team-only (private to workspace)
112
+ - Public (anyone can view)
113
+ - Draft/private docs?
114
+
115
+ Once you answer these, I can create a comprehensive plan.
116
+ \`\`\`
117
+
118
+ **DO NOT** use AskUserQuestion. Output questions as text.
119
+
93
120
  ## Step 0: Intent Classification (EVERY request)
94
121
 
95
122
  Before diving into consultation, classify the work intent:
@@ -148,7 +175,8 @@ Include:
148
175
  | **Interview Mode** | Default state | Consult, research, discuss. NO plan generation. |
149
176
  | **Pre-Generation** | "Make it into a work plan" | Summon Metis → Ask final questions |
150
177
  | **Plan Generation** | After pre-generation complete | Generate plan, optionally loop through Momus |
151
- | **Handoff** | Plan saved | Tell user to run \`/start-work\` |
178
+ | **Workflow Offer** | Plan saved | Offer structured workflow (IDEA→PRD→SPEC→INTENTS) or traditional handoff |
179
+ | **Handoff** | User choice | Start workflow engine OR tell user to run \`/start-work\` |
152
180
 
153
181
  ## Key Principles
154
182
 
@@ -156,7 +184,100 @@ Include:
156
184
  2. **Research-Backed Advice** - Use agents to provide evidence-based recommendations
157
185
  3. **User Controls Transition** - NEVER generate plan until explicitly requested
158
186
  4. **Metis Before Plan** - Always catch gaps before committing to plan
159
- 5. **Clear Handoff** - Always end with \`/start-work\` instruction`,
187
+ 5. **Clear Handoff** - Always end with \`/start-work\` instruction
188
+
189
+ ---
190
+
191
+ # PHASE 4: POST-PLAN WORKFLOW (OPTIONAL)
192
+
193
+ ## After Plan Creation: Structured Workflow Offer
194
+
195
+ Once the plan is saved to \`.olympus/plans/{name}.md\`, offer the user an enhanced workflow:
196
+
197
+ **Prompt to user:**
198
+
199
+ \`\`\`
200
+ Plan saved to \`.olympus/plans/{name}.md\`.
201
+
202
+ Would you like me to generate structured artifacts for this plan?
203
+
204
+ **Option 1: Yes - Full Workflow**
205
+ I'll run you through the complete structured workflow:
206
+ - IDEA → PRD → SPEC → INTENTS stages
207
+ - Each stage generates detailed artifacts
208
+ - Validation gates between stages
209
+ - Checkpoint-based (can pause/resume)
210
+ - All context from our interview will be preserved
211
+
212
+ **Option 2: No - Traditional Flow**
213
+ Continue with the standard workflow:
214
+ - Review plan with \`/review\` (optional)
215
+ - Start implementation with \`/start-work\`
216
+
217
+ Which would you prefer? (yes/no)
218
+ \`\`\`
219
+
220
+ ## If User Says "Yes" - Start Workflow Engine
221
+
222
+ When user confirms they want structured artifacts:
223
+
224
+ 1. **Initialize WorkflowEngine** with interview context:
225
+ - Feature name: Use the plan title
226
+ - Initial prompt: Include summary of our interview findings
227
+
228
+ 2. **Start workflow execution**:
229
+ \`\`\`typescript
230
+ // Pseudo-code representation of what should happen:
231
+ const engine = new WorkflowEngine(projectPath, featureName);
232
+ await engine.start(interviewSummary);
233
+ \`\`\`
234
+
235
+ 3. **Link master plan**: The workflow will automatically link back to the master plan file
236
+
237
+ 4. **Inform user**:
238
+ \`\`\`
239
+ Starting structured workflow with interview context...
240
+
241
+ Stage 1/4: IDEA generation
242
+ [Workflow progress will be displayed as stages execute]
243
+
244
+ Your progress is checkpointed at: \`.olympus/workflow/{workflow-id}/checkpoint.json\`
245
+ Resume anytime with: \`olympus workflow resume {workflow-id}\`
246
+ \`\`\`
247
+
248
+ ## If User Says "No" - Traditional Handoff
249
+
250
+ Proceed with standard handoff:
251
+
252
+ \`\`\`
253
+ Plan saved to \`.olympus/plans/{name}.md\`.
254
+
255
+ Next steps:
256
+ - Review with Momus: \`/review\`
257
+ - Start implementation: \`/start-work\`
258
+ \`\`\`
259
+
260
+ ## Workflow Context Inheritance
261
+
262
+ When starting the workflow, ensure these are passed from the interview:
263
+
264
+ | Interview Data | Maps To Workflow Context |
265
+ |----------------|--------------------------|
266
+ | Original request | \`initial_prompt\` |
267
+ | Interview summary | \`resume_context.interview_summary\` |
268
+ | Research findings | \`resume_context.research_findings\` |
269
+ | Metis consultation | \`resume_context.metis_insights\` |
270
+ | Requirements | \`resume_context.requirements\` |
271
+ | Master plan path | \`resume_context.master_plan\` |
272
+
273
+ This ensures the IDEA stage agent has full context without re-interviewing the user.
274
+
275
+ ## Important Notes
276
+
277
+ - **Don't force workflow**: User MUST explicitly opt in
278
+ - **Preserve context**: All interview insights must flow to workflow
279
+ - **Clear communication**: Explain what "structured artifacts" means
280
+ - **Graceful fallback**: If workflow fails to start, fall back to traditional handoff`,
160
281
  tools: ['Read', 'Write', 'Edit', 'Grep', 'Glob'],
161
282
  model: 'opus',
162
283
  metadata: PROMETHEUS_PROMPT_METADATA,
@@ -1 +1 @@
1
- {"version":3,"file":"prometheus.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/agents/prometheus.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAeG;AAIH,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,0BAA0B,GAAwB;IAC7D,QAAQ,EAAE,SAAS;IACnB,IAAI,EAAE,WAAW;IACjB,WAAW,EAAE,YAAY;IACzB,QAAQ,EAAE;QACR;YACE,MAAM,EAAE,oBAAoB;YAC5B,OAAO,EAAE,wDAAwD;SAClE;KACF;IACD,OAAO,EAAE;QACP,qCAAqC;QACrC,wDAAwD;QACxD,mCAAmC;QACnC,qCAAqC;KACtC;IACD,SAAS,EAAE;QACT,+BAA+B;QAC/B,uCAAuC;QACvC,4BAA4B;KAC7B;CACF,CAAC;AAEF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,eAAe,GAAgB;IAC1C,IAAI,EAAE,YAAY;IAClB,WAAW,EAAE,mJAAmJ;IAChK,MAAM,EAAE;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;mEAqHyD;IACjE,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IAChD,KAAK,EAAE,MAAM;IACb,QAAQ,EAAE,0BAA0B;CACrC,CAAC"}
1
+ {"version":3,"file":"prometheus.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/agents/prometheus.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAeG;AAIH,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,0BAA0B,GAAwB;IAC7D,QAAQ,EAAE,SAAS;IACnB,IAAI,EAAE,WAAW;IACjB,WAAW,EAAE,YAAY;IACzB,QAAQ,EAAE;QACR;YACE,MAAM,EAAE,oBAAoB;YAC5B,OAAO,EAAE,wDAAwD;SAClE;KACF;IACD,OAAO,EAAE;QACP,qCAAqC;QACrC,wDAAwD;QACxD,mCAAmC;QACnC,qCAAqC;KACtC;IACD,SAAS,EAAE;QACT,+BAA+B;QAC/B,uCAAuC;QACvC,4BAA4B;KAC7B;CACF,CAAC;AAEF,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,eAAe,GAAgB;IAC1C,IAAI,EAAE,YAAY;IAClB,WAAW,EAAE,mJAAmJ;IAChK,MAAM,EAAE;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;sFA8O4E;IACpF,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC;IAChD,KAAK,EAAE,MAAM;IACb,QAAQ,EAAE,0BAA0B;CACrC,CAAC"}
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
1
+ /**
2
+ * SPEC Writer Agent - Technical Specification Specialist
3
+ *
4
+ * Purpose: Transform PRD artifacts into comprehensive technical specifications with architecture, API design, and implementation details
5
+ *
6
+ * When to Use:
7
+ * - After PRD artifact is validated
8
+ * - User runs /tech-spec command
9
+ * - Executing SPEC stage in workflow
10
+ *
11
+ * Model: Opus (high quality for technical architecture design)
12
+ * Capabilities: Reads PRD artifacts, analyzes codebase patterns, generates structured technical specifications
13
+ *
14
+ * Specializes in translating requirements into technical architecture and implementation plans.
15
+ */
16
+ import type { AgentConfig, AgentPromptMetadata } from './types.js';
17
+ export declare const SPEC_WRITER_PROMPT_METADATA: AgentPromptMetadata;
18
+ export declare const specWriterAgent: AgentConfig;
19
+ //# sourceMappingURL=spec-writer.d.ts.map
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
1
+ {"version":3,"file":"spec-writer.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/agents/spec-writer.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAcG;AAEH,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,WAAW,EAAE,mBAAmB,EAAE,MAAM,YAAY,CAAC;AAEnE,eAAO,MAAM,2BAA2B,EAAE,mBA0BzC,CAAC;AAEF,eAAO,MAAM,eAAe,EAAE,WAoe7B,CAAC"}