oh-my-opencode 5.1.45 → 5.1.46

package/dist/skills/ulw-research/scripts/claim-kinds.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+import { describe, expect, test } from "bun:test"
+import { spawnSync } from "node:child_process"
+import { readFileSync } from "node:fs"
+import { join } from "node:path"
+
+import { CLAIM_ATTRIBUTE, CLAIM_KINDS, CLAIM_TABLE_BEGIN, CLAIM_TABLE_END, renderClaimKindTable, unmarkedKinds } from "./claim-kinds.mjs"
+import { DEFECT_CODES } from "./contracts.mjs"
+import { valueChecks } from "./fidelity-values.mjs"
+import { buildContext } from "./gates-static.mjs"
+import { parseHtml } from "./html-lite.mjs"
+
+// Protects the claim-kind contract the writer (fill) and the gate share: a fact marked with a
+// claim kind must cite a row that kind accepts, a mark binds only the facts it owns, and the doc
+// table writers read is rendered from CLAIM_KINDS. Expectations come from ORACLE below, written by
+// hand from the design, never from the table under test.
+
+type Defect = { code: string; severity: string }
+type Row = Record<string, unknown> & { fact_id: string; kind: string; source_id: string | null; raw?: string; quote?: string }
+
+const FIX = join(import.meta.dir, "tests", "fixtures", "fidelity")
+const BASE: { rows: Row[] } = JSON.parse(readFileSync(join(FIX, "ledger-verify.json"), "utf8"))
+const byId = (id: string) => BASE.rows.find((row) => row.fact_id === id) as Row
+const [F1, F7, F8, Q1] = ["F1", "F7", "F8", "Q1"].map(byId) as [Row, Row, Row, Row]
+const plain = { render: null, operation: null, operands: [], derived_from: [], formula: null, factor: null }
+const F9: Row = { ...F8, ...plain, fact_id: "F9", kind: "assumed", label: "growth_rate", raw: "15%", value: "15", unit: "%", exact: { num: "15", den: "1" }, rationale: "planning assumption" }
+const F10: Row = { ...F8, ...plain, fact_id: "F10", kind: "derived", label: "share_sum", raw: "39%", value: "39", unit: "%", exact: { num: "39", den: "1" }, operation: "sum", operands: ["F5", "F6"] }
+const F11: Row = { ...F7, fact_id: "F11", locator: null }
+const F12: Row = { ...F7, fact_id: "F12", locator: { artifact: "missing.txt", char_start: 0, char_end: 9 } }
+const F13: Row = { ...F7, fact_id: "F13", locator: { artifact: "../S4/text.txt", char_start: 0, char_end: 9 } }
+const LEDGER = { ...BASE, rows: [...BASE.rows, F9, F10, F11, F12, F13] }
+const SUBJECTS = [F1, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, F12, F13, Q1]
+
+/** Hand-written oracle: the ledger row kinds each claim kind accepts, and whether the cited row must be command-backed. */
+const ORACLE: Record<string, { rows: string[]; command: boolean }> = {
+	fact: { rows: ["measured", "converted", "derived"], command: false },
+	quote: { rows: ["quote"], command: false },
+	verified: { rows: ["measured", "quote"], command: true },
+	derived: { rows: ["derived", "converted"], command: false },
+	assumed: { rows: ["assumed"], command: false },
+}
+/** Rows an unmarked element refuses (an unmarked numeral reads as a fact, so an assumption needs its A mark). */
+const UNMARKED_REFUSED = new Set(["F9"])
+/** Rows whose own locator artifact sits in a snapshot whose meta.json kind is command (S5/text.txt). */
+const COMMAND_BACKED = new Set(["F7"])
+const MAJOR_FOR: Record<string, string> = { fact: "claim_kind_mismatch", quote: "claim_kind_mismatch", verified: "unsupported_verification", derived: "claim_kind_mismatch", assumed: "claim_kind_mismatch" }
+const expected = (kind: string, row: Row) => {
+	const rule = ORACLE[kind] as { rows: string[]; command: boolean }
+	return rule.rows.includes(row.kind) && (!rule.command || COMMAND_BACKED.has(row.fact_id)) ? [] : [MAJOR_FOR[kind] as string]
+}
+
+const CLAIM_CODES = new Set(["claim_kind_mismatch", "unsupported_verification", "verification_claim_unmarked"])
+const run = (body: string) => valueChecks(buildContext(parseHtml(`<h2>Findings</h2>\n${body}`), { baseDir: FIX }), LEDGER, null, join(FIX, "sources"), {}) as Defect[]
+const claims = (body: string) => run(body).filter((d) => CLAIM_CODES.has(d.code))
+const codes = (body: string) => claims(body).map((d) => d.code).sort()
+
+const value = (row: Row, kind?: string) => {
+	const mark = kind ? ` ${CLAIM_ATTRIBUTE}="${kind}"` : ""
+	return row.kind === "quote" ? `<q data-fact="${row.fact_id}"${mark} data-quote-sel="full">${row.quote}</q>` : `<data class="fact"${mark} data-fact="${row.fact_id}">${row.raw}</data>`
+}
+const prose = (inner: string, lead = "The figure is") => `<p>${lead} ${inner} [S4].</p>`
+const cell = (inner: string) => `<table><tr><th>Item</th><td>${inner}</td></tr></table>`
+
+describe("every claim kind against the hand-written oracle", () => {
+	for (const kind of Object.keys(ORACLE)) {
+		for (const row of SUBJECTS) {
+			const want = expected(kind, row)
+			const label = want.length === 0 ? "no claim defect" : `${want[0]} major`
+			test(`#given ${kind} marked on ${row.fact_id} (${row.kind}) in prose and in a table cell #then ${label}`, () => {
+				for (const body of [prose(value(row, kind)), cell(value(row, kind))]) {
+					expect(codes(body)).toEqual(want)
+					for (const defect of claims(body)) expect(defect.severity).toBe("major")
+				}
+			})
+			test(`#given ${kind} marked on an enclosing element over ${row.fact_id} #then the parent's mark binds it: ${label}`, () => {
+				expect(codes(`<p><span ${CLAIM_ATTRIBUTE}="${kind}">The figure is ${value(row)}</span> [S4].</p>`)).toEqual(want)
+			})
+			test(`#given ${kind} marked on ${row.fact_id} beside an unmarked command row #then the neighbour never satisfies it: ${label}`, () => {
+				expect(codes(prose(`${value(row, kind)}, and the suite reported ${value(F7)}`))).toEqual(want)
+			})
+			for (const inner of Object.keys(ORACLE).filter((other) => other !== kind)) {
+				test(`#given ${inner} nested inside ${kind} over ${row.fact_id} #then mismatch, the parent owns nothing, and the inner kind is still checked`, () => {
+					const body = `<p><span ${CLAIM_ATTRIBUTE}="${kind}">The figure is ${value(row, inner)}</span> [S4].</p>`
+					expect(codes(body)).toEqual(["claim_kind_mismatch", MAJOR_FOR[kind] as string, ...expected(inner, row)].sort())
+				})
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	for (const row of SUBJECTS) {
+		const refused = UNMARKED_REFUSED.has(row.fact_id) ? ["claim_kind_mismatch:major"] : []
+		const refusedLabel = refused.length ? "claim_kind_mismatch major" : "no claim code"
+		test(`#given ${row.fact_id} unmarked in a first-person run sentence #then the minor verification_claim_unmarked, plus ${refusedLabel}`, () => {
+			const found = claims(prose(value(row), "We ran the check and it reported"))
+			expect(found.map((d) => `${d.code}:${d.severity}`).sort()).toEqual([...refused, "verification_claim_unmarked:minor"].sort())
+		})
+		test(`#given ${row.fact_id} unmarked in a plain sentence in prose and in a table cell #then ${refusedLabel}`, () => {
+			for (const body of [prose(value(row)), cell(value(row))]) expect(claims(body).map((d) => `${d.code}:${d.severity}`)).toEqual(refused)
+		})
+	}
+
+	test("#given an unknown claim kind #then claim_kind_mismatch", () => {
+		expect(codes(prose(value(F1, "rumoured")))).toEqual(["claim_kind_mismatch"])
+	})
+
+	test("#given every defect and warning code the table names #then contracts defines it, and warnings are never major", () => {
+		for (const entry of Object.values(CLAIM_KINDS) as { defect: string; unmarked: { code: string } | null }[]) {
+			expect(DEFECT_CODES[entry.defect]).toBeDefined()
+			if (entry.unmarked) expect(DEFECT_CODES[entry.unmarked.code].severity).toBe("minor")
+		}
+	})
+})
+
+describe("design-check regressions", () => {
+	test("#given verified wrapping a fact-marked page row (F1 shadowing) #then the parent is unsupported and the nesting is a mismatch", () => {
+		expect(codes(`<p><span ${CLAIM_ATTRIBUTE}="verified">The inspection put the span at ${value(F1, "fact")}</span> [S4].</p>`)).toEqual(["claim_kind_mismatch", "unsupported_verification"])
+	})
+
+	test("#given one verified value and an unmarked value in the same run sentence (F2) #then the unmarked one still warns", () => {
+		expect(codes(prose(`${value(F7, "verified")}, and the span is ${value(F1)}`, "We ran the suite and it reported"))).toEqual(["verification_claim_unmarked"])
+	})
+
+	test("#given a truthful converted and derived value marked fact (F3) #then no stricter than unmarked", () => {
+		for (const row of [F8, F9, F10]) expect(codes(prose(value(row, "fact")))).toEqual(codes(prose(value(row))))
+		expect(codes(prose(value(F8, "fact")))).toEqual([])
+	})
+
+	test("#given the assumed row F9 unmarked or marked fact #then both refuse it, and the unmarked message names the A mark", () => {
+		expect(codes(prose(value(F9)))).toEqual(["claim_kind_mismatch"])
+		expect(codes(prose(value(F9, "fact")))).toEqual(["claim_kind_mismatch"])
+		expect(JSON.stringify(claims(prose(value(F9))))).toContain("{{A:F9}}")
+	})
+
+	test("#given the assumed row F9 marked {{A:F9}} (data-claim-kind=assumed) #then no claim defect", () => {
+		expect(codes(prose(value(F9, "assumed")))).toEqual([])
+		expect(codes(cell(value(F9, "assumed")))).toEqual([])
+	})
+
+	test("#given verified citing a command-sourced row with no, a missing, or an escaping locator artifact (F4) #then unsupported_verification", () => {
+		for (const row of [F11, F12, F13]) expect(codes(prose(value(row, "verified")))).toEqual(["unsupported_verification"])
+	})
+})
+
+describe("unmarked phrases", () => {
+	const fires = [
+		"We verified the span by running the measurement script.",
+		"We ran the suite twice.",
+		"We executed the export.",
+		"We verified by hand-counting the rows.",
+		"We have run the tests.",
+		"I ran the suite.",
+		"Our numbers were obtained by running the script.",
+		"우리가 실행해 확인한 길이",
+		"저희가 스크립트를 실행하여 검증한 값",
+		"저희가 테스트를 돌렸다",
+		"우리 팀이 벤치마크를 돌려 얻은 값",
+		"그래서 우리는 스크립트를 실행했다",
+		"직접 실행한 결과",
+	]
+	const quiet = [
+		"The tests showed a 12 % drop.",
+		"The bridge, which ran across the river, spans 320 m.",
+		"The span, as confirmed with the annual inspection report, is 320 m.",
+		"Clinical tests confirmed the diagnosis.",
+		"The authors obtained estimates by running simulations.",
+		"We ran out of time.",
+		"확인된 길이는 최대 320 m",
+		"개발자가 직접 실행한 결과를 보고했다",
+		"실행해 확인한 길이",
+		"우리나라에서 실행된 정책은 320개다",
+		"우리 정부가 실행한 예산",
+		"우리가 의뢰한 업체가 테스트를 돌렸다",
+		"우리는 결과를 확인했다",
+	]
+	for (const text of fires) test(`#given "${text}" #then verified`, () => expect(unmarkedKinds(text)).toEqual(["verified"]))
+	for (const text of quiet) test(`#given "${text}" #then nothing`, () => expect(unmarkedKinds(text)).toEqual([]))
+})
+
+describe("references/fidelity-claim-kinds.md is rendered from CLAIM_KINDS", () => {
+	const doc = readFileSync(join(import.meta.dir, "..", "references", "fidelity-claim-kinds.md"), "utf8")
+
+	test("the committed table section equals renderClaimKindTable() byte for byte", () => {
+		const [begin, end] = [doc.indexOf(CLAIM_TABLE_BEGIN), doc.indexOf(CLAIM_TABLE_END)]
+		expect(begin).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0)
+		expect(end).toBeGreaterThan(begin)
+		expect(doc.slice(begin + CLAIM_TABLE_BEGIN.length + 1, end)).toBe(renderClaimKindTable())
+	})
+
+	test("node claim-kinds.mjs --render-doc prints the same table", () => {
+		const result = spawnSync("node", [join(import.meta.dir, "claim-kinds.mjs"), "--render-doc"], { encoding: "utf8" })
+		expect(result.status).toBe(0)
+		expect(result.stdout).toBe(renderClaimKindTable())
+	})
+})

package/dist/skills/ulw-research/scripts/cli-support.mjs

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 // cli-support.mjs - argument parsing, typed usage errors, exit-code mapping, and JSON file IO
 // shared by every report-tools subcommand. node: builtins only.
 
-import { readFileSync, renameSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs"
+import { createHash } from "node:crypto"
+import { readFileSync, renameSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs"
 import { basename, dirname, join } from "node:path"
 
 /** A usage or input error: always exit code 2. */
@@ -87,11 +88,24 @@ export function readJsonFile(path) {
 	}
 }
 
-/** Write JSON through a sibling temp file + rename, so a crash never leaves a half-written file. */
-export function writeJsonAtomic(path, value) {
+/** The sha256 hex digest of a string or bytes: the one hash every record and receipt carries. */
+export const sha256Of = (content) => createHash("sha256").update(content).digest("hex")
+
+/** Write text through a sibling temp file + rename; a failed write removes the temp file. */
+export function writeTextAtomic(path, text) {
 	const temp = join(dirname(path), `.${basename(path)}.${process.pid}.${Date.now()}.tmp`)
-	writeFileSync(temp, `${JSON.stringify(value, null, 2)}\n`)
-	renameSync(temp, path)
+	try {
+		writeFileSync(temp, text)
+		renameSync(temp, path)
+	} catch (error) {
+		rmSync(temp, { force: true })
+		throw error
+	}
+}
+
+/** Write JSON through writeTextAtomic, so a crash never leaves a half-written file. */
+export function writeJsonAtomic(path, value) {
+	writeTextAtomic(path, `${JSON.stringify(value, null, 2)}\n`)
 }
 
 /** Print a result: JSON on stdout, one summary line on stderr. */

package/dist/skills/ulw-research/scripts/cli-support.test.ts

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 import { describe, expect, onTestFinished, test } from "bun:test"
-import { mkdtempSync, readdirSync, readFileSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs"
+import { mkdirSync, mkdtempSync, readdirSync, readFileSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs"
 import { tmpdir } from "node:os"
 import { join } from "node:path"
 import { pathToFileURL } from "node:url"
 
-import { CliError, exitCodeFor, parseArgs, readJsonFile, writeJsonAtomic } from "./cli-support.mjs"
+import { CliError, exitCodeFor, parseArgs, readJsonFile, writeJsonAtomic, writeTextAtomic } from "./cli-support.mjs"
 import { isCliEntry } from "./entry-guard.mjs"
 
 function tempDir() {
@@ -65,6 +65,17 @@ describe("JSON files", () => {
 		expect(leftovers).toEqual([])
 	})
 
+	test("#given a target the rename cannot replace #when written atomically #then the write throws and no temp file is left", () => {
+		// given: a non-empty directory where the file should go
+		const dir = tempDir()
+		const target = join(dir, "calibration.jsonl")
+		mkdirSync(target)
+		writeFileSync(join(target, "keep"), "x")
+		// when / then
+		expect(() => writeTextAtomic(target, "line\n")).toThrow()
+		expect(readdirSync(dir)).toEqual(["calibration.jsonl"])
+	})
+
 	test("#given a missing or malformed file #when read #then a CliError names the path", () => {
 		const dir = tempDir()
 		expect(() => readJsonFile(join(dir, "missing.json"))).toThrow(CliError)

package/dist/skills/ulw-research/scripts/contracts.mjs

@@ -6,6 +6,16 @@
 
 export const SCHEMA_VERSION = 1
 
+/** The severity vocabulary in rank order; every DEFECT_CODES entry uses one of these. */
+export const SEVERITIES = Object.freeze(["blocker", "major", "minor"])
+
+/** Defect counts per severity, then total. */
+export function countDefects(defects) {
+	const counts = Object.fromEntries(SEVERITIES.map((severity) => [severity, 0]))
+	for (const defect of defects) counts[defect.severity] += 1
+	return { ...counts, total: defects.length }
+}
+
 function deepFreeze(value) {
 	if (value === null || typeof value !== "object") return value
 	for (const key of Object.keys(value)) deepFreeze(value[key])
@@ -48,7 +58,7 @@ export const DEFECT_CODES = deepFreeze({
 	pointer_label_mismatch: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The placeholder's label is not the row's label; check the id, then the label." },
 	quote_anchor_unresolved: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "A from or to anchor is missing or occurs more than once in the quote; pick unique anchor words." },
 	unit_duplicated: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The unit after the placeholder repeats the row's unit; use :value or remove the unit." },
-	polish_diff_fail: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The polish pass changed numbers, tickers, or table rows; revert to the pre-polish artifact and apply the language fixes only." },
+	polish_diff_fail: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The polish pass changed numbers, tickers, table rows, claim ids, markup, or hidden content; revert to the pre-polish artifact and apply the language fixes only." },
 	fidelity_interview_incomplete: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "A fidelity field is pending or missing in brief.md; answer the open question or record its default, then rerun." },
 	derived_not_allowed: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The brief allows no derived or assumed numbers; cite a source row directly or change the brief with the requester." },
 	source_outside_floor: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The row's source is outside the source floor the brief records; use a source the brief allows or remove the fact." },
@@ -57,7 +67,8 @@ export const DEFECT_CODES = deepFreeze({
 	quote_unbound: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "A direct quotation has no ledger quote row; register it with fact quote and insert it through its placeholder." },
 	edition_unverified: { severity: "blocker", integrity: true, hint: "The delivered file has no matching fact verify record; run fact verify on that edition and record it with --verified-by." },
 	untraceable_number: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "Replace the typed number with a {{F<n>}} placeholder backed by a ledger row, or register it as assumed with a rationale." },
-	unsupported_verification: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The sentence claims a tool check that no recorded command output backs; link the recorded output row or remove the claim." },
+	unsupported_verification: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "A sentence marked verified (data-claim-kind=\"verified\") cites a row that is not recorded command output; cite the recorded output row or drop the verified mark." },
+	claim_kind_mismatch: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "An element marked with a claim kind (data-claim-kind) cites a row that kind does not accept, or the kind is unknown; cite a row of that kind or fix the mark (references/fidelity-claim-kinds.md)." },
 	conflicting_readings: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "Two ledger rows with different periods or qualifiers are cited as one fact; split the sentence or retire one row." },
 	hedge_dropped: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "Restore the qualifier the source uses (estimated, about, not yet)." },
 	direction_flipped: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The source states the opposite direction; rewrite from the quote." },
@@ -65,7 +76,8 @@ export const DEFECT_CODES = deepFreeze({
 	qualifier_dropped: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The source bounds this value (up to, at least, about); restore the qualifier or use :q." },
 	unbound_sentence: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "Bind the sentence to a fact, a quote, a citation, or a claim-graph node with data-claim." },
 	meaning_drift_confirmed: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "Two independent readers found the same drift; rewrite from the quote or dispute with a reason." },
-	polish_edit_rejected: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The edit changed a number, a hedge, a qualifier, a link, or a claim id; re-propose the language fix only." },
+	meaning_unverified: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "No meaning reader judged this pair, or no strong reader judged a force_strong pair; run the missing reader on pairs.json and rerun fact meaning-check." },
+	polish_edit_rejected: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The edit changed a number, a hedge, a qualifier, a link, or a claim id, or contained <, > or &; re-propose the language fix only, narrowed to the words around any entity or tag." },
 	polish_hedging_decreased: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The polish pass removed qualifiers; restore them." },
 	polish_text_churn: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "More than half the text changed during polish; the pass composed instead of proofreading." },
 	snapshot_mismatch: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The operands come from different collection windows; use rows from one window or state the windows separately." },
@@ -73,6 +85,7 @@ export const DEFECT_CODES = deepFreeze({
 	quote_stale_version: { severity: "major", integrity: false, hint: "The quoted source revision differs from the revision the report targets; re-snapshot the target revision or date the quote." },
 	quote_fuzzy_match: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "The source text is OCR-noisy; confirm the snapshot and prefer the raw document." },
 	name_outside_quote: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "A name in the sentence is not in the cited quote; add the source or remove the name." },
+	verification_claim_unmarked: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "The sentence reads as a check we ran but carries no verified mark; mark it {{V:F<n>:label}} on a recorded command-output row, or reword it." },
 	scope_widened_warn: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "The sentence uses a broader scope word than the quote; confirm the scope or narrow it." },
 	particle_unverified: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "The particle after this value could not be checked; read it aloud and fix it by hand if wrong." },
 	fallback_without_entity: { severity: "minor", integrity: false, hint: "The replacement quote has no entity for attribution; set one on the row." },
@@ -87,10 +100,10 @@ export const FIDELITY_CODES = Object.freeze([
 	"unresolved_placeholder", "value_mismatch", "unit_mismatch", "quote_not_verbatim", "claim_status_invalid",
 	"incompatible_operands", "pointer_label_mismatch", "quote_anchor_unresolved", "unit_duplicated", "polish_diff_fail",
 	"fidelity_interview_incomplete", "derived_not_allowed", "source_outside_floor", "snapshot_hash_mismatch",
-	"chart_value_untraceable", "quote_unbound", "edition_unverified", "untraceable_number", "unsupported_verification",
+	"chart_value_untraceable", "quote_unbound", "edition_unverified", "untraceable_number", "unsupported_verification", "claim_kind_mismatch",
 	"conflicting_readings", "hedge_dropped", "direction_flipped", "causality_added", "qualifier_dropped", "unbound_sentence",
-	"meaning_drift_confirmed", "polish_edit_rejected", "polish_hedging_decreased", "polish_text_churn", "snapshot_mismatch",
-	"join_integrity_fail", "quote_stale_version", "quote_fuzzy_match", "name_outside_quote", "scope_widened_warn",
+	"meaning_drift_confirmed", "meaning_unverified", "polish_edit_rejected", "polish_hedging_decreased", "polish_text_churn", "snapshot_mismatch",
+	"join_integrity_fail", "quote_stale_version", "quote_fuzzy_match", "name_outside_quote", "verification_claim_unmarked", "scope_widened_warn",
 	"particle_unverified", "fallback_without_entity", "meaning_drift_warn", "polish_edit_unlocated", "polish_link_changed",
 	"polish_name_changed",
 ])
@@ -184,6 +197,14 @@ export function validateOutcomeManifest(manifest) {
 	if (isObject(manifest.gates)) {
 		for (const gate of GATE_NAMES) check(errors, GATE_STATUSES.includes(manifest.gates[gate]), `gates.${gate} must be one of ${GATE_STATUSES.join(", ")}`)
 	} else errors.push("gates must be an object")
+	if (manifest.gateHistory !== undefined) {
+		if (!Array.isArray(manifest.gateHistory)) errors.push("gateHistory must be an array")
+		else for (const entry of manifest.gateHistory) {
+			check(errors, isObject(entry) && GATE_NAMES.includes(entry.gate) && GATE_STATUSES.includes(entry.status)
+				&& typeof entry.at === "string" && ISO_DATE.test(entry.at)
+				&& (entry.reason === undefined || typeof entry.reason === "string"), "gateHistory entries must have a known gate, status, timestamp, and optional reason")
+		}
+	}
 	if (Array.isArray(manifest.residualDefects)) manifest.residualDefects.forEach((defect, index) => validateDefect(defect, `residualDefects[${index}]`, errors))
 	else errors.push("residualDefects must be an array")
 	check(errors, manifest.repair === null || isObject(manifest.repair), "repair must be null or an object")

package/dist/skills/ulw-research/scripts/contracts.test.ts

@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ const FIDELITY_BLOCKERS = [
 const FIDELITY_MAJORS = [
 	"untraceable_number",
 	"unsupported_verification",
+	"claim_kind_mismatch",
 	"conflicting_readings",
 	"hedge_dropped",
 	"direction_flipped",
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ const FIDELITY_MAJORS = [
 	"qualifier_dropped",
 	"unbound_sentence",
 	"meaning_drift_confirmed",
+	"meaning_unverified",
 	"polish_edit_rejected",
 	"polish_hedging_decreased",
 	"polish_text_churn",
@@ -92,6 +94,7 @@ const FIDELITY_MAJORS = [
 const FIDELITY_MINORS = [
 	"quote_fuzzy_match",
 	"name_outside_quote",
+	"verification_claim_unmarked",
 	"scope_widened_warn",
 	"particle_unverified",
 	"fallback_without_entity",

package/dist/skills/ulw-research/scripts/copy-returns.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+// Architecture contract (retention bar): each shared table, list, regex, or classifier has one owner
+// export, so a reintroduced local copy in a consumer fails one of these tests (#11156 sweep).
+import { describe, expect, test } from "bun:test"
+import { readdirSync, readFileSync } from "node:fs"
+import { join } from "node:path"
+
+import { sha256Of } from "./cli-support.mjs"
+import { countDefects, DEFECT_CODES, SEVERITIES } from "./contracts.mjs"
+import { meaningStatus, PROMOTION, promotionEligibility } from "./fact-commands-meaning.mjs"
+import { editionFormatOf, MD_HTML_BLOCK_RULES, markdownAsHtml, projectMarkdownInline } from "./fact-commands-verify.mjs"
+import { EXEMPT_KINDS, isExemptKind } from "./fidelity-binding.mjs"
+import { blocksDelivery } from "./gates-fidelity.mjs"
+import { MD_BLOCK_PATTERNS, parseMarkdown } from "./md-lite.mjs"
+import { DRIFT_KINDS, isDriftKind, MODEL_TIERS, VERDICT_SCHEMA, VERDICTS } from "./meaning-check.mjs"
+import { parseRenderedQuote, renderQuote } from "./placeholder.mjs"
+
+const source = (name: string) => readFileSync(join(import.meta.dir, name), "utf8")
+
+describe("severity vocabulary comes from contracts", () => {
+	test("#given DEFECT_CODES #when its severities are collected #then they are exactly SEVERITIES", () => {
+		const used = new Set(Object.values(DEFECT_CODES).map((entry) => entry.severity))
+		expect([...used].sort()).toEqual([...SEVERITIES].sort())
+		expect(Object.isFrozen(SEVERITIES)).toBe(true)
+	})
+
+	test("#given defects of every severity #when counted #then the buckets are SEVERITIES plus total", () => {
+		const defects = SEVERITIES.map((severity) => ({ severity }))
+		expect(Object.keys(countDefects(defects))).toEqual([...SEVERITIES, "total"])
+		expect(countDefects(defects)).toEqual({ ...Object.fromEntries(SEVERITIES.map((severity) => [severity, 1])), total: SEVERITIES.length })
+	})
+
+	test("#given every registry code and an unknown code #when the meaning status is computed #then it follows blocksDelivery", () => {
+		for (const code of [...Object.keys(DEFECT_CODES), "not_a_registered_code"]) {
+			expect(meaningStatus([{ code, severity: "minor" }]), code).toBe(blocksDelivery({ code }) ? "fail" : "pass")
+		}
+		expect(meaningStatus([])).toBe("pass")
+	})
+
+	test("#given the command modules #when read #then none restates the severity buckets, the pair kinds, or a window literal", () => {
+		for (const name of ["fact-commands-meaning.mjs", "fact-commands-verify.mjs"]) {
+			const text = source(name)
+			expect(text, name).not.toMatch(/blocker:\s*0/u)
+			expect(text, name).not.toMatch(/\["quote",\s*"claim",\s*"translation"\]/u)
+			expect(text, name).not.toMatch(/slice\(-\d+\)/u)
+			expect(text, name).not.toMatch(/counts\.blocker \+ counts\.major/u)
+		}
+	})
+})
+
+describe("one sha256 helper", () => {
+	test("#given every runtime module #when read #then only cli-support builds a hash, so records and receipts share sha256Of", () => {
+		const modules = readdirSync(import.meta.dir).filter((name) => name.endsWith(".mjs") && name !== "cli-support.mjs")
+		expect(modules.length).toBeGreaterThan(0)
+		for (const name of modules) expect(source(name), name).not.toMatch(/createHash\(/u)
+		expect(sha256Of("abc")).toBe("ba7816bf8f01cfea414140de5dae2223b00361a396177a9cb410ff61f20015ad")
+		expect(sha256Of(Buffer.from("abc"))).toBe(sha256Of("abc"))
+	})
+})
+
+describe("calibration policy is the exported PROMOTION", () => {
+	const confirmedRun = (run: string, disputed: boolean) => ({ run_id: run, confirmed: true, disputed })
+
+	test("#given false blocks only before the window #when eligibility is computed #then they are not counted", () => {
+		const window = PROMOTION.false_block_window
+		expect(Number.isInteger(window) && window > 0).toBe(true)
+		const old = [0, 1, 2].map((n) => confirmedRun(`old${n}`, true))
+		const recent = Array.from({ length: window }, (_, n) => confirmedRun(`new${n}`, false))
+		expect(promotionEligibility([...old, ...recent]).report_false_blocks_in_window).toBe(0)
+		expect(promotionEligibility([...recent, ...old]).report_false_blocks_in_window).toBe(3)
+	})
+
+	test("#given false blocks at the policy maximum #when eligibility is computed #then the threshold read from PROMOTION decides", () => {
+		const limit = PROMOTION.max_report_false_blocks_in_window
+		const clean = Array.from({ length: PROMOTION.min_runs * 20 }, (_, n) => confirmedRun(`c${n}`, false))
+		const blocks = (count: number) => Array.from({ length: count }, (_, n) => confirmedRun(`b${n}`, true))
+		expect(promotionEligibility([...clean, ...blocks(limit)]).eligible).toBe(true)
+		expect(promotionEligibility([...clean, ...blocks(limit + 1)]).eligible).toBe(false)
+	})
+})
+
+describe("verdict schema comes from the meaning-check registries", () => {
+	test("#given VERDICT_SCHEMA #when read #then its vocabularies are the owner exports", () => {
+		expect(VERDICT_SCHEMA.verdict).toBe(VERDICTS)
+		expect(VERDICT_SCHEMA.model_tier).toBe(MODEL_TIERS)
+		expect(VERDICT_SCHEMA.drift_kind).toBe(DRIFT_KINDS)
+		expect(Object.isFrozen(VERDICTS)).toBe(true)
+	})
+
+	test("#given every drift kind and a stranger #when checked #then isDriftKind is membership in DRIFT_KINDS", () => {
+		for (const kind of DRIFT_KINDS) expect(isDriftKind(kind)).toBe(true)
+		expect(isDriftKind("not_a_kind")).toBe(false)
+		expect(source("meaning-check.mjs")).not.toMatch(/new Set\(DRIFT_KINDS\)|new Set\(\["drift"/u)
+	})
+})
+
+describe("inherited lexical tables come from their owners", () => {
+	test("#given fact-pairs #when read #then it holds no Hangul range, exempt-kind set, or hand-built hedge regex", () => {
+		const text = source("fact-pairs.mjs")
+		expect(text).not.toMatch(/\\uAC00-\\uD7A3/u)
+		expect(text).not.toMatch(/\["opinion",\s*"recommendation"\]/u)
+		expect(text).not.toMatch(/new RegExp\(/u)
+	})
+
+	test("#given EXEMPT_KINDS #when checked #then isExemptKind is membership in it", () => {
+		for (const kind of EXEMPT_KINDS) expect(isExemptKind(kind)).toBe(true)
+		expect(isExemptKind("finding")).toBe(false)
+		expect(isExemptKind(undefined)).toBe(false)
+	})
+
+	test("#given md-lite #when its block grammar is read #then MD_BLOCK_PATTERNS names every block regex", () => {
+		expect(Object.keys(MD_BLOCK_PATTERNS).sort()).toEqual(["BLOCKQUOTE", "CLOSING_HASHES", "FENCE", "HEADING", "LIST_ITEM", "TABLE_SEPARATOR", "THEMATIC_BREAK"])
+		for (const pattern of Object.values(MD_BLOCK_PATTERNS)) expect(pattern).toBeInstanceOf(RegExp)
+		expect(Object.isFrozen(MD_BLOCK_PATTERNS)).toBe(true)
+	})
+})
+
+describe("markdown projection rules", () => {
+	const EVERY_KIND = ["# Title", "", "Para text.", "", "- item", "", "> quoted", "", "| a | b |", "| - | - |", "| 1 | 2 |", "", "```", "code", "```", ""].join("\n")
+
+	test("#given every block kind md-lite emits #when projected #then each kind has a projection rule", () => {
+		const kinds = [...new Set(parseMarkdown(EVERY_KIND).blocks.map((block: { kind: string }) => block.kind))].sort()
+		expect(kinds).toEqual(["blockquote", "code", "heading", "list_item", "paragraph", "table_row"])
+		for (const kind of kinds) expect(Object.hasOwn(MD_HTML_BLOCK_RULES, kind), kind).toBe(true)
+		expect(Object.keys(MD_HTML_BLOCK_RULES).sort()).toEqual(kinds)
+		const { html } = markdownAsHtml(EVERY_KIND, [], { rows: [] })
+		expect(html).toContain("<h1>Title</h1>")
+		expect(html).toContain("<ul><li>item</li></ul>")
+		expect(html).toMatch(/<table><tr><td>a<\/td><td>b<\/td><\/tr>\s*<tr><td>1<\/td><td>2<\/td><\/tr><\/table>/u)
+	})
+
+	test("#given an unterminated fence #when projected #then it is refused naming the line", () => {
+		expect(() => markdownAsHtml("Intro.\n\n```\nno close\n", [], { rows: [] })).toThrow(/unterminated_fence at line 3/u)
+	})
+
+	test("#given inline links and code #when projected #then they stay elements and the rest is escaped", () => {
+		expect(projectMarkdownInline("a <b> [x](https://e.x) `c`")).toBe('a &lt;b&gt; <a href="https://e.x">x</a> <code>c</code>')
+	})
+
+	test("#given a fill map with quotes in translates and fact_id #when projected #then the attributes are escaped", () => {
+		const md = "Before X after.\n\n> Quoted block.\n"
+		const span = { fact_id: 'F"1', start: 7, end: 8, rendered: "X", translates: 'T"1' }
+		const block = { fact_id: 'Q"2', start: md.indexOf(">"), end: md.length - 1, rendered: "", replaced: "a" }
+		const { html } = markdownAsHtml(md, [span, block], { rows: [] })
+		expect(html).toContain('data-translates="T&quot;1"')
+		expect(html).toContain('data-fact="Q&quot;2"')
+		expect(markdownAsHtml("Before X after.\n", [{ ...span, translates: undefined }], { rows: [] }).html).toContain('data-fact="F&quot;1"')
+		expect(html).not.toMatch(/="[^"]*"1"/u)
+	})
+
+	test("#given paths of each case #when the format is inferred #then md and markdown are Markdown and a flag wins", () => {
+		expect(["r.md", "R.MD", "r.markdown", "r.html", "r.txt"].map((path) => editionFormatOf(path, undefined))).toEqual(["md", "md", "md", "html", "html"])
+		expect(editionFormatOf("r.md", "html")).toBe("html")
+	})
+})
+
+describe("rendered quotes round-trip through the placeholder owner", () => {
+	const row = { fact_id: "Q1", kind: "quote", source_id: "S4", quote: "We estimate completion no earlier than 2027." }
+	const selections = [
+		["full", row.quote],
+		["lead=2", "We estimate"],
+		["from=completion,to=2027", "completion no earlier than 2027"],
+	]
+
+	for (const [selector, text] of selections) {
+		test(`#given a ${selector} quote rendered for md #when projected #then the quote element and marker survive`, () => {
+			const rendered = renderQuote(row, selector, text, "md")
+			expect(parseRenderedQuote(rendered)).toEqual({ text, marker: "[S4]" })
+			const md = `The operator wrote ${rendered}.\n`
+			const entry = { fact_id: "Q1", start: md.indexOf(rendered), end: md.indexOf(rendered) + rendered.length, rendered, selector }
+			const projected = markdownAsHtml(md, [entry], { rows: [row] })
+			expect(projected.html).toContain(renderQuote(row, selector, text, "html"))
+			expect(projected.stale).toEqual([])
+			const edited = md.replace(text, `${text} indeed`)
+			const stale = markdownAsHtml(edited, [{ ...entry, end: entry.end + " indeed".length }], { rows: [row] })
+			expect(stale.html).not.toContain("<q ")
+			expect(stale.stale).toHaveLength(1)
+		})
+	}
+
+	test("#given bytes that are not the md quote layout #when parsed #then null", () => {
+		expect(parseRenderedQuote("plain text [S4]")).toBeNull()
+	})
+})