oh-my-opencode 4.4.0 → 4.5.1

package/.agents/skills/work-with-pr-workspace/iteration-1/eval-1/with_skill/outputs/verification-strategy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+# Verification Strategy
+
+## Pre-Push Local Validation
+
+Before every push, run all three checks sequentially:
+
+```bash
+bun run typecheck && bun test && bun run build
+```
+
+Specific test files to watch:
+```bash
+bun test src/config/schema/background-task.test.ts
+bun test src/features/background-agent/concurrency.test.ts
+```
+
+---
+
+## Gate A: CI (`ci.yml`)
+
+### What CI runs
+1. **Tests (split):** mock-heavy tests run in isolation (separate `bun test` processes), rest in batch
+2. **Typecheck:** `bun run typecheck` (tsc --noEmit)
+3. **Build:** `bun run build` (ESM + declarations + schema)
+4. **Schema auto-commit:** if generated schema changed, CI commits it
+
+### How to monitor
+```bash
+gh pr checks <PR_NUMBER> --watch
+```
+
+### Common failure scenarios and fixes
+
+| Failure | Likely Cause | Fix |
+|---------|-------------|-----|
+| Typecheck error | New field not matching existing type imports | Verify `BackgroundTaskConfig` type is auto-inferred from schema, no manual type updates needed |
+| Test failure | Test assertion wrong or missing import | Fix test, re-push |
+| Build failure | Import cycle or missing export | Check barrel exports in `src/config/schema.ts` (already re-exports via `export *`) |
+| Schema auto-commit | Generated JSON schema changed | Pull the auto-commit, rebase if needed |
+
+### Recovery
+```bash
+# Read CI logs
+gh run view <RUN_ID> --log-failed
+
+# Fix, commit, push
+git add -A && git commit -m "fix: address CI failure" && git push
+```
+
+---
+
+## Gate B: review-work (5 parallel agents)
+
+### What it checks
+Run `/review-work` which launches 5 background sub-agents:
+
+| Agent | Role | What it checks for this PR |
+|-------|------|---------------------------|
+| Oracle (goal) | Goal/constraint verification | Does `maxBackgroundAgents` actually limit agents? Is default 5? Is min 1? |
+| Oracle (quality) | Code quality | Follows existing patterns? No catch-all files? Under 200 LOC? given/when/then tests? |
+| Oracle (security) | Security review | No injection vectors, no unsafe defaults, proper input validation via Zod |
+| Hephaestus (QA) | Hands-on QA execution | Actually runs tests, checks typecheck, verifies build |
+| Hephaestus (context) | Context mining | Checks git history, related issues, ensures no duplicate/conflicting PRs |
+
+### Pass criteria
+All 5 agents must pass. Any single failure blocks.
+
+### Common failure scenarios and fixes
+
+| Agent | Likely Issue | Fix |
+|-------|-------------|-----|
+| Oracle (goal) | Global limit not enforced in all exit paths (completion, cancel, error, interrupt) | Audit every status transition in `manager.ts` that should call `releaseGlobal()` |
+| Oracle (quality) | Test style not matching given/when/then | Restructure tests with `#given`/`#when`/`#then` describe nesting |
+| Oracle (quality) | File exceeds 200 LOC | `concurrency.ts` is 137 LOC + ~25 new = ~162 LOC, safe. `manager.ts` is already large but we're adding ~20 lines to existing methods, not creating new responsibility |
+| Oracle (security) | Integer overflow or negative values | Zod `.int().min(1)` handles this at config parse time |
+| Hephaestus (QA) | Test actually fails when run | Run tests locally first, fix before push |
+
+### Recovery
+```bash
+# Review agent output
+background_output(task_id="<review-work-task-id>")
+
+# Fix identified issues
+# ... edit files ...
+git add -A && git commit -m "fix: address review-work feedback" && git push
+```
+
+---
+
+## Gate C: Cubic (`cubic-dev-ai[bot]`)
+
+### What it checks
+Cubic is an automated code review bot that analyzes the PR diff. It must respond with "No issues found" for the gate to pass.
+
+### Common failure scenarios and fixes
+
+| Issue | Likely Cause | Fix |
+|-------|-------------|-----|
+| "Missing error handling" | `releaseGlobal()` not called in some error path | Add `releaseGlobal()` to the missed path |
+| "Inconsistent naming" | Field name doesn't match convention | Use `maxBackgroundAgents` (camelCase in schema, `max_background_agents` in JSONC config) |
+| "Missing documentation" | No JSDoc on new public methods | Add JSDoc comments to `canSpawnGlobally()`, `acquireGlobal()`, `releaseGlobal()`, `getMaxBackgroundAgents()` |
+| "Test coverage gap" | Missing edge case test | Add the specific test case Cubic identifies |
+
+### Recovery
+```bash
+# Read Cubic's review
+gh api repos/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/reviews
+
+# Address each comment
+# ... edit files ...
+git add -A && git commit -m "fix: address Cubic review feedback" && git push
+```
+
+---
+
+## Verification Loop Pseudocode
+
+```
+iteration = 0
+while true:
+  iteration++
+  log("Verification iteration ${iteration}")
+
+  # Gate A: CI (cheapest, check first)
+  push_and_wait_for_ci()
+  if ci_failed:
+    read_ci_logs()
+    fix_and_commit()
+    continue
+
+  # Gate B: review-work (5 agents, more expensive)
+  run_review_work()
+  if any_agent_failed:
+    read_agent_feedback()
+    fix_and_commit()
+    continue
+
+  # Gate C: Cubic (external bot, wait for it)
+  wait_for_cubic_review()
+  if cubic_has_issues:
+    read_cubic_comments()
+    fix_and_commit()
+    continue
+
+  # All gates passed
+  break
+
+# Merge
+gh pr merge <PR_NUMBER> --squash --delete-branch
+```
+
+No iteration cap. Loop continues until all three gates pass simultaneously in a single iteration.
+
+---
+
+## Risk Assessment
+
+| Risk | Probability | Mitigation |
+|------|------------|------------|
+| Slot leak (global count never decremented) | Medium | Audit every exit path: `tryCompleteTask`, `cancelTask`, `handleEvent(session.error)`, `startTask` prompt error, `resume` prompt error |
+| Race condition on global count | Low | `globalRunningCount` is synchronous (single-threaded JS), no async gap between check and increment in `launch()` |
+| Breaking existing behavior | Low | Default is 5, same as existing per-model default. Users with <5 total agents see no change |
+| `manager.ts` exceeding 200 LOC | Already exceeded | File is already ~1500 LOC (exempt due to being a core orchestration class with many methods). Our changes add ~20 lines to existing methods, not a new responsibility |

package/.agents/skills/work-with-pr-workspace/iteration-1/eval-1/with_skill/timing.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"total_tokens": null, "duration_ms": 292000, "total_duration_seconds": 292}

package/.agents/skills/work-with-pr-workspace/iteration-1/eval-1/without_skill/grading.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "run_id": "eval-1-without_skill",
+  "expectations": [
+    {"text": "Plan uses git worktree in a sibling directory", "passed": false, "evidence": "Uses git checkout -b, no worktree isolation"},
+    {"text": "Branch is created from origin/dev", "passed": true, "evidence": "git checkout -b feat/max-background-agents dev"},
+    {"text": "Plan specifies multiple atomic commits for multi-file changes", "passed": false, "evidence": "Steps listed sequentially but no atomic commit strategy mentioned"},
+    {"text": "Runs bun run typecheck, bun test, and bun run build before pushing", "passed": true, "evidence": "Step 6 runs typecheck and tests, Step 8 implies push after verification"},
+    {"text": "PR is created targeting dev branch", "passed": true, "evidence": "Step 8 mentions creating PR"},
+    {"text": "Verification loop includes all 3 gates: CI, review-work, and Cubic", "passed": false, "evidence": "Only mentions CI pipeline in step 6. No review-work or Cubic."},
+    {"text": "Gates are checked in order: CI first, then review-work, then Cubic", "passed": false, "evidence": "No gate ordering - only CI mentioned"},
+    {"text": "Cubic check uses gh api to check cubic-dev-ai[bot] reviews", "passed": false, "evidence": "No mention of Cubic at all"},
+    {"text": "Plan includes worktree cleanup after merge", "passed": false, "evidence": "No worktree used, no cleanup needed"},
+    {"text": "Code changes reference actual files in the codebase", "passed": true, "evidence": "References actual files with detailed design decisions"}
+  ]
+}