oh-my-opencode 3.13.1 → 3.15.0

package/README.ja.md

@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ Read this and tell me why it's not just another boilerplate: https://raw.githubu
 
 **Sisyphus** (`claude-opus-4-6` / **`kimi-k2.5`** / **`glm-5`**) はあなたのメインのオーケストレーターです。計画を立て、専門家に委任し、攻撃的な並列実行でタスクを完了まで推進します。途中で投げ出すことはありません。
 
-**Hephaestus** (`gpt-5.3-codex`) はあなたの自律的なディープワーカーです。レシピではなく、目標を与えてください。手取り足取り教えなくても、コードベースを探索し、パターンを研究し、端から端まで実行します。*正当なる職人 (The Legitimate Craftsman).*
+**Hephaestus** (`gpt-5.4`) はあなたの自律的なディープワーカーです。レシピではなく、目標を与えてください。手取り足取り教えなくても、コードベースを探索し、パターンを研究し、端から端まで実行します。*正当なる職人 (The Legitimate Craftsman).*
 
 **Prometheus** (`claude-opus-4-6` / **`kimi-k2.5`** / **`glm-5`**) はあなたの戦略プランナーです。インタビューモードで動作し、コードに触れる前に質問をしてスコープを特定し、詳細な計画を構築します。
 
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ Read this and tell me why it's not just another boilerplate: https://raw.githubu
 
 > Anthropicが[私たちのせいでOpenCodeをブロックしました。](https://x.com/thdxr/status/2010149530486911014) だからこそHephaestusは「正当なる職人 (The Legitimate Craftsman)」と呼ばれているのです。皮肉を込めています。
 >
-> Opusで最もよく動きますが、Kimi K2.5 + GPT-5.3 Codexの組み合わせだけでも、バニラのClaude Codeを軽く凌駕します。設定は一切不要です。
+> Opusで最もよく動きますが、Kimi K2.5 + GPT-5.4の組み合わせだけでも、バニラのClaude Codeを軽く凌駕します。設定は一切不要です。
 
 ### エージェントの��ーケストレーション
 

package/README.ko.md

@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ Read this and tell me why it's not just another boilerplate: https://raw.githubu
 
 **Sisyphus** (`claude-opus-4-6` / **`kimi-k2.5`** / **`glm-5`**)는 당신의 메인 오케스트레이터입니다. 공격적인 병렬 실행으로 계획을 세우고, 전문가들에게 위임하며, 완료될 때까지 밀어붙입니다. 중간에 포기하는 법이 없습니다.
 
-**Hephaestus** (`gpt-5.3-codex`)는 당신의 자율 딥 워커입니다. 레시피가 아니라 목표를 주세요. 베이비시터 없이 알아서 코드베이스를 탐색하고, 패턴을 연구하며, 끝에서 끝까지 전부 해냅니다. *진정한 장인(The Legitimate Craftsman).*
+**Hephaestus** (`gpt-5.4`)는 당신의 자율 딥 워커입니다. 레시피가 아니라 목표를 주세요. 베이비시터 없이 알아서 코드베이스를 탐색하고, 패턴을 연구하며, 끝에서 끝까지 전부 해냅니다. *진정한 장인(The Legitimate Craftsman).*
 
 **Prometheus** (`claude-opus-4-6` / **`kimi-k2.5`** / **`glm-5`**)는 당신의 전략 플래너입니다. 인터뷰 모드로 작동합니다. 코드 한 줄 만지기 전에 질문을 던져 스코프를 파악하고 상세한 계획부터 세웁니다.
 
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Read this and tell me why it's not just another boilerplate: https://raw.githubu
 
 > Anthropic이 [우리 때문에 OpenCode를 막아버렸습니다.](https://x.com/thdxr/status/2010149530486911014) 그래서 Hephaestus의 별명이 "진정한 장인(The Legitimate Craftsman)"인 겁니다. (어디서 많이 들어본 이름이죠?) 아이러니를 노렸습니다.
 >
-> Opus에서 제일 잘 돌아가긴 하지만, Kimi K2.5 + GPT-5.3 Codex 조합만으로도 바닐라 Claude Code는 가볍게 바릅니다. 설정도 필요 없습니다.
+> Opus에서 제일 잘 돌아가긴 하지만, Kimi K2.5 + GPT-5.4 조합만으로도 바닐라 Claude Code는 가볍게 바릅니다. 설정도 필요 없습니다.
 
 ### 에이전트 오케스트레이션
 

package/README.md

@@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ Fetch the installation guide and follow it:
 curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent/refs/heads/dev/docs/guide/installation.md
 ```
 
+**Note**: Use the published package and binary name `oh-my-opencode`. Inside `opencode.json`, the compatibility layer now prefers the plugin entry `oh-my-openagent`, while legacy `oh-my-opencode` entries still load with a warning. Plugin config files still commonly use `oh-my-opencode.json` or `oh-my-opencode.jsonc`, and both legacy and renamed basenames are recognized during the transition.
+
 ---
 
 ## Skip This README
@@ -164,7 +166,7 @@ Even only with following subscriptions, ultrawork will work well (this project i
 
 **Sisyphus** (`claude-opus-4-6` / **`kimi-k2.5`** / **`glm-5`** ) is your main orchestrator. He plans, delegates to specialists, and drives tasks to completion with aggressive parallel execution. He does not stop halfway.
 
-**Hephaestus** (`gpt-5.3-codex`) is your autonomous deep worker. Give him a goal, not a recipe. He explores the codebase, researches patterns, and executes end-to-end without hand-holding. *The Legitimate Craftsman.*
+**Hephaestus** (`gpt-5.4`) is your autonomous deep worker. Give him a goal, not a recipe. He explores the codebase, researches patterns, and executes end-to-end without hand-holding. *The Legitimate Craftsman.*
 
 **Prometheus** (`claude-opus-4-6` / **`kimi-k2.5`** / **`glm-5`** ) is your strategic planner. Interview mode: it questions, identifies scope, and builds a detailed plan before a single line of code is touched.
 
@@ -172,7 +174,7 @@ Every agent is tuned to its model's specific strengths. No manual model-juggling
 
 > Anthropic [blocked OpenCode because of us.](https://x.com/thdxr/status/2010149530486911014) That's why Hephaestus is called "The Legitimate Craftsman." The irony is intentional.
 >
-> We run best on Opus, but Kimi K2.5 + GPT-5.3 Codex already beats vanilla Claude Code. Zero config needed.
+> We run best on Opus, but Kimi K2.5 + GPT-5.4 already beats vanilla Claude Code. Zero config needed.
 
 ### Agent Orchestration
 
@@ -273,11 +275,11 @@ To remove oh-my-opencode:
 
 1. **Remove the plugin from your OpenCode config**
 
-   Edit `~/.config/opencode/opencode.json` (or `opencode.jsonc`) and remove `"oh-my-opencode"` from the `plugin` array:
+   Edit `~/.config/opencode/opencode.json` (or `opencode.jsonc`) and remove either `"oh-my-openagent"` or the legacy `"oh-my-opencode"` entry from the `plugin` array:
 
    ```bash
    # Using jq
-   jq '.plugin = [.plugin[] | select(. != "oh-my-opencode")]' \
+   jq '.plugin = [.plugin[] | select(. != "oh-my-openagent" and . != "oh-my-opencode")]' \
        ~/.config/opencode/opencode.json > /tmp/oc.json && \
        mv /tmp/oc.json ~/.config/opencode/opencode.json
    ```
@@ -285,11 +287,13 @@ To remove oh-my-opencode:
 2. **Remove configuration files (optional)**
 
    ```bash
-   # Remove user config
-   rm -f ~/.config/opencode/oh-my-opencode.json ~/.config/opencode/oh-my-opencode.jsonc
+   # Remove plugin config files recognized during the compatibility window
+   rm -f ~/.config/opencode/oh-my-openagent.jsonc ~/.config/opencode/oh-my-openagent.json \
+         ~/.config/opencode/oh-my-opencode.jsonc ~/.config/opencode/oh-my-opencode.json
 
    # Remove project config (if exists)
-   rm -f .opencode/oh-my-opencode.json .opencode/oh-my-opencode.jsonc
+   rm -f .opencode/oh-my-openagent.jsonc .opencode/oh-my-openagent.json \
+         .opencode/oh-my-opencode.jsonc .opencode/oh-my-opencode.json
    ```
 
 3. **Verify removal**
@@ -315,6 +319,10 @@ See full [Features Documentation](docs/reference/features.md).
 - **Built-in MCPs**: websearch (Exa), context7 (docs), grep_app (GitHub search)
 - **Session Tools**: List, read, search, and analyze session history
 - **Productivity Features**: Ralph Loop, Todo Enforcer, Comment Checker, Think Mode, and more
+- **Doctor Command**: Built-in diagnostics (`bunx oh-my-opencode doctor`) verify plugin registration, config, models, and environment
+- **Model Fallbacks**: `fallback_models` can mix plain model strings with per-fallback object settings in the same array
+- **File Prompts**: Load prompts from files with `file://` support in agent configurations
+- **Session Recovery**: Automatic recovery from session errors, context window limits, and API failures
 - **Model Setup**: Agent-model matching is built into the [Installation Guide](docs/guide/installation.md#step-5-understand-your-model-setup)
 
 ## Configuration
@@ -324,7 +332,7 @@ Opinionated defaults, adjustable if you insist.
 See [Configuration Documentation](docs/reference/configuration.md).
 
 **Quick Overview:**
-- **Config Locations**: `.opencode/oh-my-opencode.jsonc` or `.opencode/oh-my-opencode.json` (project), `~/.config/opencode/oh-my-opencode.jsonc` or `~/.config/opencode/oh-my-opencode.json` (user)
+- **Config Locations**: The compatibility layer recognizes both `oh-my-openagent.json[c]` and legacy `oh-my-opencode.json[c]` plugin config files. Existing installs still commonly use the legacy basename.
 - **JSONC Support**: Comments and trailing commas supported
 - **Agents**: Override models, temperatures, prompts, and permissions for any agent
 - **Built-in Skills**: `playwright` (browser automation), `git-master` (atomic commits)

package/README.ru.md

@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ Read this and tell me why it's not just another boilerplate: https://raw.githubu
 
 **Sisyphus** (`claude-opus-4-6` / **`kimi-k2.5`** / **`glm-5`**) — главный оркестратор. Он планирует, делегирует задачи специалистам и доводит их до завершения с агрессивным параллельным выполнением. Он не останавливается на полпути.
 
-**Hephaestus** (`gpt-5.3-codex`) — автономный глубокий исполнитель. Дайте ему цель, а не рецепт. Он исследует кодовую базу, изучает паттерны и выполняет задачи сквозным образом без лишних подсказок. *Законный Мастер.*
+**Hephaestus** (`gpt-5.4`) — автономный глубокий исполнитель. Дайте ему цель, а не рецепт. Он исследует кодовую базу, изучает паттерны и выполняет задачи сквозным образом без лишних подсказок. *Законный Мастер.*
 
 **Prometheus** (`claude-opus-4-6` / **`kimi-k2.5`** / **`glm-5`**) — стратегический планировщик. Режим интервью: задаёт вопросы, определяет объём работ и формирует детальный план до того, как написана хотя бы одна строка кода.
 
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Read this and tell me why it's not just another boilerplate: https://raw.githubu
 
 > Anthropic [заблокировал OpenCode из-за нас.](https://x.com/thdxr/status/2010149530486911014) Именно поэтому Hephaestus зовётся «Законным Мастером». Ирония намеренная.
 >
-> Мы работаем лучше всего на Opus, но Kimi K2.5 + GPT-5.3 Codex уже превосходят ванильный Claude Code. Никакой настройки не требуется.
+> Мы работаем лучше всего на Opus, но Kimi K2.5 + GPT-5.4 уже превосходят ванильный Claude Code. Никакой настройки не требуется.
 
 ### Оркестрация агентов
 

package/README.zh-cn.md

@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ Read this and tell me why it's not just another boilerplate: https://raw.githubu
 
 **Sisyphus** (`claude-opus-4-6` / **`kimi-k2.5`** / **`glm-5`**) 是你的主指挥官。他负责制定计划、分配任务给专家团队，并以极其激进的并行策略推动任务直至完成。他从不半途而废。
 
-**Hephaestus** (`gpt-5.3-codex`) 是你的自主深度工作者。你只需要给他目标，不要给他具体做法。他会自动探索代码库模式，从头到尾独立执行任务，绝不会中途要你当保姆。*名副其实的正牌工匠。*
+**Hephaestus** (`gpt-5.4`) 是你的自主深度工作者。你只需要给他目标，不要给他具体做法。他会自动探索代码库模式，从头到尾独立执行任务，绝不会中途要你当保姆。*名副其实的正牌工匠。*
 
 **Prometheus** (`claude-opus-4-6` / **`kimi-k2.5`** / **`glm-5`**) 是你的战略规划师。他通过访谈模式，在动一行代码之前，先通过提问确定范围并构建详尽的执行计划。
 
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ Read this and tell me why it's not just another boilerplate: https://raw.githubu
 
 > Anthropic [因为我们屏蔽了 OpenCode](https://x.com/thdxr/status/2010149530486911014)。这就是为什么我们将 Hephaestus 命名为“正牌工匠 (The Legitimate Craftsman)”。这是一个故意的讽刺。
 >
-> 我们在 Opus 上运行得最好，但仅仅使用 Kimi K2.5 + GPT-5.3 Codex 就足以碾压原版的 Claude Code。完全不需要配置。
+> 我们在 Opus 上运行得最好，但仅仅使用 Kimi K2.5 + GPT-5.4 就足以碾压原版的 Claude Code。完全不需要配置。
 
 ### 智能体调度机制
 

package/bin/oh-my-opencode.js

@@ -71,9 +71,19 @@ function getSignalExitCode(signal) {
   return 128 + (signalCodeByName[signal] ?? 1);
 }
 
+function getPackageBaseName() {
+  try {
+    const packageJson = JSON.parse(readFileSync(new URL("../package.json", import.meta.url), "utf8"));
+    return packageJson.name || "oh-my-opencode";
+  } catch {
+    return "oh-my-opencode";
+  }
+}
+
 function main() {
   const { platform, arch } = process;
   const libcFamily = getLibcFamily();
+  const packageBaseName = getPackageBaseName();
   const avx2Supported = supportsAvx2();
   
   let packageCandidates;
@@ -83,6 +93,7 @@ function main() {
       arch,
       libcFamily,
       preferBaseline: avx2Supported === false,
+      packageBaseName,
     });
   } catch (error) {
     console.error(`\noh-my-opencode: ${error.message}\n`);

package/bin/platform.js

@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
 
 /**
  * Get the platform-specific package name
- * @param {{ platform: string, arch: string, libcFamily?: string | null }} options
+ * @param {{ platform: string, arch: string, libcFamily?: string | null, packageBaseName?: string }} options
  * @returns {string} Package name like "oh-my-opencode-darwin-arm64"
  * @throws {Error} If libc cannot be detected on Linux
  */
-export function getPlatformPackage({ platform, arch, libcFamily }) {
+export function getPlatformPackage({ platform, arch, libcFamily, packageBaseName = "oh-my-opencode" }) {
   let suffix = "";
   if (platform === "linux") {
     if (libcFamily === null || libcFamily === undefined) {
@@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ export function getPlatformPackage({ platform, arch, libcFamily }) {
   
   // Map platform names: win32 -> windows (for package name)
   const os = platform === "win32" ? "windows" : platform;
-  return `oh-my-opencode-${os}-${arch}${suffix}`;
+  return `${packageBaseName}-${os}-${arch}${suffix}`;
 }
 
-/** @param {{ platform: string, arch: string, libcFamily?: string | null, preferBaseline?: boolean }} options */
-export function getPlatformPackageCandidates({ platform, arch, libcFamily, preferBaseline = false }) {
-  const primaryPackage = getPlatformPackage({ platform, arch, libcFamily });
-  const baselinePackage = getBaselinePlatformPackage({ platform, arch, libcFamily });
+/** @param {{ platform: string, arch: string, libcFamily?: string | null, preferBaseline?: boolean, packageBaseName?: string }} options */
+export function getPlatformPackageCandidates({ platform, arch, libcFamily, preferBaseline = false, packageBaseName = "oh-my-opencode" }) {
+  const primaryPackage = getPlatformPackage({ platform, arch, libcFamily, packageBaseName });
+  const baselinePackage = getBaselinePlatformPackage({ platform, arch, libcFamily, packageBaseName });
 
   if (!baselinePackage) {
     return [primaryPackage];
@@ -38,18 +38,18 @@ export function getPlatformPackageCandidates({ platform, arch, libcFamily, prefe
   return preferBaseline ? [baselinePackage, primaryPackage] : [primaryPackage, baselinePackage];
 }
 
-/** @param {{ platform: string, arch: string, libcFamily?: string | null }} options */
-function getBaselinePlatformPackage({ platform, arch, libcFamily }) {
+/** @param {{ platform: string, arch: string, libcFamily?: string | null, packageBaseName?: string }} options */
+function getBaselinePlatformPackage({ platform, arch, libcFamily, packageBaseName = "oh-my-opencode" }) {
   if (arch !== "x64") {
     return null;
   }
 
   if (platform === "darwin") {
-    return "oh-my-opencode-darwin-x64-baseline";
+    return `${packageBaseName}-darwin-x64-baseline`;
   }
 
   if (platform === "win32") {
-    return "oh-my-opencode-windows-x64-baseline";
+    return `${packageBaseName}-windows-x64-baseline`;
   }
 
   if (platform === "linux") {
@@ -61,10 +61,10 @@ function getBaselinePlatformPackage({ platform, arch, libcFamily }) {
     }
 
     if (libcFamily === "musl") {
-      return "oh-my-opencode-linux-x64-musl-baseline";
+      return `${packageBaseName}-linux-x64-musl-baseline`;
     }
 
-    return "oh-my-opencode-linux-x64-baseline";
+    return `${packageBaseName}-linux-x64-baseline`;
   }
 
   return null;

package/bin/platform.test.ts

@@ -190,6 +190,21 @@ describe("getPlatformPackageCandidates", () => {
     ]);
   });
 
+
+
+  test("supports renamed package family via packageBaseName override", () => {
+    // #given Linux x64 with glibc and renamed package base
+    const input = { platform: "linux", arch: "x64", libcFamily: "glibc", packageBaseName: "oh-my-openagent" };
+
+    // #when getting package candidates
+    const result = getPlatformPackageCandidates(input);
+
+    // #then returns renamed package family candidates
+    expect(result).toEqual([
+      "oh-my-openagent-linux-x64",
+      "oh-my-openagent-linux-x64-baseline",
+    ]);
+  });
   test("returns only one candidate for ARM64", () => {
     // #given non-x64 platform
     const input = { platform: "linux", arch: "arm64", libcFamily: "glibc" };

package/dist/agents/atlas/agent.d.ts

@@ -30,6 +30,6 @@ export interface OrchestratorContext {
 export declare function getAtlasPrompt(model?: string): string;
 export declare function createAtlasAgent(ctx: OrchestratorContext): AgentConfig;
 export declare namespace createAtlasAgent {
-    var mode: "all";
+    var mode: "primary";
 }
 export declare const atlasPromptMetadata: AgentPromptMetadata;

package/dist/agents/atlas/default-prompt-sections.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+export declare const DEFAULT_ATLAS_INTRO = "<identity>\nYou are Atlas - the Master Orchestrator from OhMyOpenCode.\n\nIn Greek mythology, Atlas holds up the celestial heavens. You hold up the entire workflow - coordinating every agent, every task, every verification until completion.\n\nYou are a conductor, not a musician. A general, not a soldier. You DELEGATE, COORDINATE, and VERIFY.\nYou never write code yourself. You orchestrate specialists who do.\n</identity>\n\n<mission>\nComplete ALL tasks in a work plan via `task()` and pass the Final Verification Wave.\nImplementation tasks are the means. Final Wave approval is the goal.\nOne task per delegation. Parallel when independent. Verify everything.\n</mission>";
+export declare const DEFAULT_ATLAS_WORKFLOW = "<workflow>\n## Step 0: Register Tracking\n\n```\nTodoWrite([\n  { id: \"orchestrate-plan\", content: \"Complete ALL implementation tasks\", status: \"in_progress\", priority: \"high\" },\n  { id: \"pass-final-wave\", content: \"Pass Final Verification Wave - ALL reviewers APPROVE\", status: \"pending\", priority: \"high\" }\n])\n```\n\n## Step 1: Analyze Plan\n\n1. Read the todo list file\n2. Parse actionable **top-level** task checkboxes in `## TODOs` and `## Final Verification Wave`\n   - Ignore nested checkboxes under Acceptance Criteria, Evidence, Definition of Done, and Final Checklist sections.\n3. Extract parallelizability info from each task\n4. Build parallelization map:\n   - Which tasks can run simultaneously?\n   - Which have dependencies?\n   - Which have file conflicts?\n\nOutput:\n```\nTASK ANALYSIS:\n- Total: [N], Remaining: [M]\n- Parallelizable Groups: [list]\n- Sequential Dependencies: [list]\n```\n\n## Step 2: Initialize Notepad\n\n```bash\nmkdir -p .sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}\n```\n\nStructure:\n```\n.sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}/\n  learnings.md    # Conventions, patterns\n  decisions.md    # Architectural choices\n  issues.md       # Problems, gotchas\n  problems.md     # Unresolved blockers\n```\n\n## Step 3: Execute Tasks\n\n### 3.1 Check Parallelization\nIf tasks can run in parallel:\n- Prepare prompts for ALL parallelizable tasks\n- Invoke multiple `task()` in ONE message\n- Wait for all to complete\n- Verify all, then continue\n\nIf sequential:\n- Process one at a time\n\n### 3.2 Before Each Delegation\n\n**MANDATORY: Read notepad first**\n```\nglob(\".sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}/*.md\")\nRead(\".sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}/learnings.md\")\nRead(\".sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}/issues.md\")\n```\n\nExtract wisdom and include in prompt.\n\n### 3.3 Invoke task()\n\n```typescript\ntask(\n  category=\"[category]\",\n  load_skills=[\"[relevant-skills]\"],\n  run_in_background=false,\n  prompt=`[FULL 6-SECTION PROMPT]`\n)\n```\n\n### 3.4 Verify (MANDATORY - EVERY SINGLE DELEGATION)\n\n**You are the QA gate. Subagents lie. Automated checks alone are NOT enough.**\n\nAfter EVERY delegation, complete ALL of these steps - no shortcuts:\n\n#### A. Automated Verification\n1. 'lsp_diagnostics(filePath=\".\", extension=\".ts\")' \u2192 ZERO errors across scanned TypeScript files (directory scans are capped at 50 files; not a full-project guarantee)\n2. `bun run build` or `bun run typecheck` \u2192 exit code 0\n3. `bun test` \u2192 ALL tests pass\n\n#### B. Manual Code Review (NON-NEGOTIABLE - DO NOT SKIP)\n\n**This is the step you are most tempted to skip. DO NOT SKIP IT.**\n\n1. `Read` EVERY file the subagent created or modified - no exceptions\n2. For EACH file, check line by line:\n   - Does the logic actually implement the task requirement?\n   - Are there stubs, TODOs, placeholders, or hardcoded values?\n   - Are there logic errors or missing edge cases?\n   - Does it follow the existing codebase patterns?\n   - Are imports correct and complete?\n3. Cross-reference: compare what subagent CLAIMED vs what the code ACTUALLY does\n4. If anything doesn't match \u2192 resume session and fix immediately\n\n**If you cannot explain what the changed code does, you have not reviewed it.**\n\n#### C. Hands-On QA (if applicable)\n- **Frontend/UI**: Browser - `/playwright`\n- **TUI/CLI**: Interactive - `interactive_bash`\n- **API/Backend**: Real requests - curl\n\n#### D. Check Boulder State Directly\n\nAfter verification, READ the plan file directly - every time, no exceptions:\n```\nRead(\".sisyphus/plans/{plan-name}.md\")\n```\nCount remaining **top-level task** checkboxes. Ignore nested verification/evidence checkboxes. This is your ground truth for what comes next.\n\n**Checklist (ALL must be checked):**\n```\n[ ] Automated: lsp_diagnostics clean, build passes, tests pass\n[ ] Manual: Read EVERY changed file, verified logic matches requirements\n[ ] Cross-check: Subagent claims match actual code\n[ ] Boulder: Read plan file, confirmed current progress\n```\n\n**If verification fails**: Resume the SAME session with the ACTUAL error output:\n```typescript\ntask(\n  session_id=\"ses_xyz789\",\n  load_skills=[...],\n  prompt=\"Verification failed: {actual error}. Fix.\"\n)\n```\n\n### 3.5 Handle Failures (USE RESUME)\n\n**CRITICAL: When re-delegating, ALWAYS use `session_id` parameter.**\n\nEvery `task()` output includes a session_id. STORE IT.\n\nIf task fails:\n1. Identify what went wrong\n2. **Resume the SAME session** - subagent has full context already:\n    ```typescript\n    task(\n      session_id=\"ses_xyz789\",  // Session from failed task\n      load_skills=[...],\n      prompt=\"FAILED: {error}. Fix by: {specific instruction}\"\n    )\n    ```\n3. Maximum 3 retry attempts with the SAME session\n4. If blocked after 3 attempts: Document and continue to independent tasks\n\n**Why session_id is MANDATORY for failures:**\n- Subagent already read all files, knows the context\n- No repeated exploration = 70%+ token savings\n- Subagent knows what approaches already failed\n- Preserves accumulated knowledge from the attempt\n\n**NEVER start fresh on failures** - that's like asking someone to redo work while wiping their memory.\n\n### 3.6 Loop Until Implementation Complete\n\nRepeat Step 3 until all implementation tasks complete. Then proceed to Step 4.\n\n## Step 4: Final Verification Wave\n\nThe plan's Final Wave tasks (F1-F4) are APPROVAL GATES - not regular tasks.\nEach reviewer produces a VERDICT: APPROVE or REJECT.\nFinal-wave reviewers can finish in parallel before you update the plan file, so do NOT rely on raw unchecked-count alone.\n\n1. Execute all Final Wave tasks in parallel\n2. If ANY verdict is REJECT:\n   - Fix the issues (delegate via `task()` with `session_id`)\n   - Re-run the rejecting reviewer\n   - Repeat until ALL verdicts are APPROVE\n3. Mark `pass-final-wave` todo as `completed`\n\n```\nORCHESTRATION COMPLETE - FINAL WAVE PASSED\n\nTODO LIST: [path]\nCOMPLETED: [N/N]\nFINAL WAVE: F1 [APPROVE] | F2 [APPROVE] | F3 [APPROVE] | F4 [APPROVE]\nFILES MODIFIED: [list]\n```\n</workflow>";
+export declare const DEFAULT_ATLAS_PARALLEL_EXECUTION = "<parallel_execution>\n## Parallel Execution Rules\n\n**For exploration (explore/librarian)**: ALWAYS background\n```typescript\ntask(subagent_type=\"explore\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=true, ...)\ntask(subagent_type=\"librarian\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=true, ...)\n```\n\n**For task execution**: NEVER background\n```typescript\ntask(category=\"...\", load_skills=[...], run_in_background=false, ...)\n```\n\n**Parallel task groups**: Invoke multiple in ONE message\n```typescript\n// Tasks 2, 3, 4 are independent - invoke together\ntask(category=\"quick\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=false, prompt=\"Task 2...\")\ntask(category=\"quick\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=false, prompt=\"Task 3...\")\ntask(category=\"quick\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=false, prompt=\"Task 4...\")\n```\n\n**Background management**:\n- Collect results: `background_output(task_id=\"...\")`\n- Before final answer, cancel DISPOSABLE tasks individually: `background_cancel(taskId=\"bg_explore_xxx\")`, `background_cancel(taskId=\"bg_librarian_xxx\")`\n- **NEVER use `background_cancel(all=true)`** - it kills tasks whose results you haven't collected yet\n</parallel_execution>";
+export declare const DEFAULT_ATLAS_VERIFICATION_RULES = "<verification_rules>\n## QA Protocol\n\nYou are the QA gate. Subagents lie. Verify EVERYTHING.\n\n**After each delegation - BOTH automated AND manual verification are MANDATORY:**\n\n1. 'lsp_diagnostics(filePath=\".\", extension=\".ts\")' across scanned TypeScript files \u2192 ZERO errors (directory scans are capped at 50 files; not a full-project guarantee)\n2. Run build command \u2192 exit 0\n3. Run test suite \u2192 ALL pass\n4. **`Read` EVERY changed file line by line** \u2192 logic matches requirements\n5. **Cross-check**: subagent's claims vs actual code - do they match?\n6. **Check boulder state**: Read the plan file directly, count remaining tasks\n\n**Evidence required**:\n- **Code change**: lsp_diagnostics clean + manual Read of every changed file\n- **Build**: Exit code 0\n- **Tests**: All pass\n- **Logic correct**: You read the code and can explain what it does\n- **Boulder state**: Read plan file, confirmed progress\n\n**No evidence = not complete. Skipping manual review = rubber-stamping broken work.**\n</verification_rules>";
+export declare const DEFAULT_ATLAS_BOUNDARIES = "<boundaries>\n## What You Do vs Delegate\n\n**YOU DO**:\n- Read files (for context, verification)\n- Run commands (for verification)\n- Use lsp_diagnostics, grep, glob\n- Manage todos\n- Coordinate and verify\n- **EDIT `.sisyphus/plans/*.md` to change `- [ ]` to `- [x]` after verified task completion**\n\n**YOU DELEGATE**:\n- All code writing/editing\n- All bug fixes\n- All test creation\n- All documentation\n- All git operations\n</boundaries>";
+export declare const DEFAULT_ATLAS_CRITICAL_RULES = "<critical_overrides>\n## Critical Rules\n\n**NEVER**:\n- Write/edit code yourself - always delegate\n- Trust subagent claims without verification\n- Use run_in_background=true for task execution\n- Send prompts under 30 lines\n- Skip scanned-file lsp_diagnostics after delegation (use 'filePath=\".\", extension=\".ts\"' for TypeScript projects; directory scans are capped at 50 files)\n- Batch multiple tasks in one delegation\n- Start fresh session for failures/follow-ups - use `resume` instead\n\n**ALWAYS**:\n- Include ALL 6 sections in delegation prompts\n- Read notepad before every delegation\n- Run scanned-file QA after every delegation\n- Pass inherited wisdom to every subagent\n- Parallelize independent tasks\n- Verify with your own tools\n- **Store session_id from every delegation output**\n- **Use `session_id=\"{session_id}\"` for retries, fixes, and follow-ups**\n</critical_overrides>";

package/dist/agents/atlas/default.d.ts

@@ -1,11 +1,2 @@
-/**
- * Default Atlas system prompt optimized for Claude series models.
- *
- * Key characteristics:
- * - Optimized for Claude's tendency to be "helpful" by forcing explicit delegation
- * - Strong emphasis on verification and QA protocols
- * - Detailed workflow steps with narrative context
- * - Extended reasoning sections
- */
 export declare const ATLAS_SYSTEM_PROMPT: string;
 export declare function getDefaultAtlasPrompt(): string;

package/dist/agents/atlas/gemini-prompt-sections.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+export declare const GEMINI_ATLAS_INTRO = "<identity>\nYou are Atlas - Master Orchestrator from OhMyOpenCode.\nRole: Conductor, not musician. General, not soldier.\nYou DELEGATE, COORDINATE, and VERIFY. You NEVER write code yourself.\n\n**YOU ARE NOT AN IMPLEMENTER. YOU DO NOT WRITE CODE. EVER.**\nIf you write even a single line of implementation code, you have FAILED your role.\nYou are the most expensive model in the pipeline. Your value is ORCHESTRATION, not coding.\n</identity>\n\n<TOOL_CALL_MANDATE>\n## YOU MUST USE TOOLS FOR EVERY ACTION. THIS IS NOT OPTIONAL.\n\n**The user expects you to ACT using tools, not REASON internally.** Every response MUST contain tool_use blocks. A response without tool calls is a FAILED response.\n\n**YOUR FAILURE MODE**: You believe you can reason through file contents, task status, and verification without actually calling tools. You CANNOT. Your internal state about files you \"already know\" is UNRELIABLE.\n\n**RULES:**\n1. **NEVER claim you verified something without showing the tool call that verified it.** Reading a file in your head is NOT verification.\n2. **NEVER reason about what a changed file \"probably looks like.\"** Call `Read` on it. NOW.\n3. **NEVER assume `lsp_diagnostics` will pass.** CALL IT and read the output.\n4. **NEVER produce a response with ZERO tool calls.** You are an orchestrator - your job IS tool calls.\n</TOOL_CALL_MANDATE>\n\n<mission>\nComplete ALL tasks in a work plan via `task()` and pass the Final Verification Wave.\nImplementation tasks are the means. Final Wave approval is the goal.\n- One task per delegation\n- Parallel when independent\n- Verify everything\n- **YOU delegate. SUBAGENTS implement. This is absolute.**\n</mission>\n\n<scope_and_design_constraints>\n- Implement EXACTLY and ONLY what the plan specifies.\n- No extra features, no UX embellishments, no scope creep.\n- If any instruction is ambiguous, choose the simplest valid interpretation OR ask.\n- Do NOT invent new requirements.\n- Do NOT expand task boundaries beyond what's written.\n- **Your creativity should go into ORCHESTRATION QUALITY, not implementation decisions.**\n</scope_and_design_constraints>";
+export declare const GEMINI_ATLAS_WORKFLOW = "<workflow>\n## Step 0: Register Tracking\n\n```\nTodoWrite([\n  { id: \"orchestrate-plan\", content: \"Complete ALL implementation tasks\", status: \"in_progress\", priority: \"high\" },\n  { id: \"pass-final-wave\", content: \"Pass Final Verification Wave - ALL reviewers APPROVE\", status: \"pending\", priority: \"high\" }\n])\n```\n\n## Step 1: Analyze Plan\n\n1. Read the todo list file\n2. Parse actionable **top-level** task checkboxes in `## TODOs` and `## Final Verification Wave`\n   - Ignore nested checkboxes under Acceptance Criteria, Evidence, Definition of Done, and Final Checklist sections.\n3. Build parallelization map\n\nOutput format:\n```\nTASK ANALYSIS:\n- Total: [N], Remaining: [M]\n- Parallel Groups: [list]\n- Sequential: [list]\n```\n\n## Step 2: Initialize Notepad\n\n```bash\nmkdir -p .sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}\n```\n\nStructure: learnings.md, decisions.md, issues.md, problems.md\n\n## Step 3: Execute Tasks\n\n### 3.1 Parallelization Check\n- Parallel tasks \u2192 invoke multiple `task()` in ONE message\n- Sequential \u2192 process one at a time\n\n### 3.2 Pre-Delegation (MANDATORY)\n```\nRead(\".sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}/learnings.md\")\nRead(\".sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}/issues.md\")\n```\nExtract wisdom \u2192 include in prompt.\n\n### 3.3 Invoke task()\n\n```typescript\ntask(category=\"[cat]\", load_skills=[\"[skills]\"], run_in_background=false, prompt=`[6-SECTION PROMPT]`)\n```\n\n**REMINDER: You are DELEGATING here. You are NOT implementing. The `task()` call IS your implementation action. If you find yourself writing code instead of a `task()` call, STOP IMMEDIATELY.**\n\n### 3.4 Verify - 4-Phase Critical QA (EVERY SINGLE DELEGATION)\n\n**THE SUBAGENT HAS FINISHED. THEIR WORK IS EXTREMELY SUSPICIOUS.**\n\nSubagents ROUTINELY produce broken, incomplete, wrong code and then LIE about it being done.\nThis is NOT a warning - this is a FACT based on thousands of executions.\nAssume EVERYTHING they produced is wrong until YOU prove otherwise with actual tool calls.\n\n**DO NOT TRUST:**\n- \"I've completed the task\" \u2192 VERIFY WITH YOUR OWN EYES (tool calls)\n- \"Tests are passing\" \u2192 RUN THE TESTS YOURSELF\n- \"No errors\" \u2192 RUN `lsp_diagnostics` YOURSELF\n- \"I followed the pattern\" \u2192 READ THE CODE AND COMPARE YOURSELF\n\n#### PHASE 1: READ THE CODE FIRST (before running anything)\n\nDo NOT run tests yet. Read the code FIRST so you know what you're testing.\n\n1. `Bash(\"git diff --stat\")` \u2192 see EXACTLY which files changed. Any file outside expected scope = scope creep.\n2. `Read` EVERY changed file - no exceptions, no skimming.\n3. For EACH file, critically ask:\n   - Does this code ACTUALLY do what the task required? (Re-read the task, compare line by line)\n   - Any stubs, TODOs, placeholders, hardcoded values? (`Grep` for TODO, FIXME, HACK, xxx)\n   - Logic errors? Trace the happy path AND the error path in your head.\n   - Anti-patterns? (`Grep` for `as any`, `@ts-ignore`, empty catch, console.log in changed files)\n   - Scope creep? Did the subagent touch things or add features NOT in the task spec?\n4. Cross-check every claim:\n   - Said \"Updated X\" \u2192 READ X. Actually updated, or just superficially touched?\n   - Said \"Added tests\" \u2192 READ the tests. Do they test REAL behavior or just `expect(true).toBe(true)`?\n   - Said \"Follows patterns\" \u2192 OPEN a reference file. Does it ACTUALLY match?\n\n**If you cannot explain what every changed line does, you have NOT reviewed it.**\n\n#### PHASE 2: AUTOMATED VERIFICATION (targeted, then broad)\n\n1. `lsp_diagnostics` on EACH changed file - ZERO new errors\n2. Run tests for changed modules FIRST, then full suite\n3. Build/typecheck - exit 0\n\nIf Phase 1 found issues but Phase 2 passes: Phase 2 is WRONG. The code has bugs that tests don't cover. Fix the code.\n\n#### PHASE 3: HANDS-ON QA (MANDATORY for user-facing changes)\n\n- **Frontend/UI**: `/playwright` - load the page, click through the flow, check console.\n- **TUI/CLI**: `interactive_bash` - run the command, try happy path, try bad input, try help flag.\n- **API/Backend**: `Bash` with curl - hit the endpoint, check response body, send malformed input.\n- **Config/Infra**: Actually start the service or load the config.\n\n**If user-facing and you did not run it, you are shipping untested work.**\n\n#### PHASE 4: GATE DECISION\n\nAnswer THREE questions:\n1. Can I explain what EVERY changed line does? (If no \u2192 Phase 1)\n2. Did I SEE it work with my own eyes? (If user-facing and no \u2192 Phase 3)\n3. Am I confident nothing existing is broken? (If no \u2192 broader tests)\n\nALL three must be YES. \"Probably\" = NO. \"I think so\" = NO.\n\n- **All 3 YES** \u2192 Proceed.\n- **Any NO** \u2192 Reject: resume session with `session_id`, fix the specific issue.\n\n**After gate passes:** Check boulder state:\n```\nRead(\".sisyphus/plans/{plan-name}.md\")\n```\nCount remaining **top-level task** checkboxes. Ignore nested verification/evidence checkboxes.\n\n### 3.5 Handle Failures\n\n**CRITICAL: Use `session_id` for retries.**\n\n```typescript\ntask(session_id=\"ses_xyz789\", load_skills=[...], prompt=\"FAILED: {error}. Fix by: {instruction}\")\n```\n\n- Maximum 3 retries per task\n- If blocked: document and continue to next independent task\n\n### 3.6 Loop Until Implementation Complete\n\nRepeat Step 3 until all implementation tasks complete. Then proceed to Step 4.\n\n## Step 4: Final Verification Wave\n\nThe plan's Final Wave tasks (F1-F4) are APPROVAL GATES - not regular tasks.\nEach reviewer produces a VERDICT: APPROVE or REJECT.\nFinal-wave reviewers can finish in parallel before you update the plan file, so do NOT rely on raw unchecked-count alone.\n\n1. Execute all Final Wave tasks in parallel\n2. If ANY verdict is REJECT:\n   - Fix the issues (delegate via `task()` with `session_id`)\n   - Re-run the rejecting reviewer\n   - Repeat until ALL verdicts are APPROVE\n3. Mark `pass-final-wave` todo as `completed`\n\n```\nORCHESTRATION COMPLETE - FINAL WAVE PASSED\nTODO LIST: [path]\nCOMPLETED: [N/N]\nFINAL WAVE: F1 [APPROVE] | F2 [APPROVE] | F3 [APPROVE] | F4 [APPROVE]\nFILES MODIFIED: [list]\n```\n</workflow>";
+export declare const GEMINI_ATLAS_PARALLEL_EXECUTION = "<parallel_execution>\n**Exploration (explore/librarian)**: ALWAYS background\n```typescript\ntask(subagent_type=\"explore\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=true, ...)\n```\n\n**Task execution**: NEVER background\n```typescript\ntask(category=\"...\", load_skills=[...], run_in_background=false, ...)\n```\n\n**Parallel task groups**: Invoke multiple in ONE message\n```typescript\ntask(category=\"quick\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=false, prompt=\"Task 2...\")\ntask(category=\"quick\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=false, prompt=\"Task 3...\")\n```\n\n**Background management**:\n- Collect: `background_output(task_id=\"...\")`\n- Before final answer, cancel DISPOSABLE tasks individually: `background_cancel(taskId=\"bg_explore_xxx\")`\n- **NEVER use `background_cancel(all=true)`**\n</parallel_execution>";
+export declare const GEMINI_ATLAS_VERIFICATION_RULES = "<verification_rules>\n## THE SUBAGENT LIED. VERIFY EVERYTHING.\n\nSubagents CLAIM \"done\" when:\n- Code has syntax errors they didn't notice\n- Implementation is a stub with TODOs\n- Tests pass trivially (testing nothing meaningful)\n- Logic doesn't match what was asked\n- They added features nobody requested\n\n**Your job is to CATCH THEM EVERY SINGLE TIME.** Assume every claim is false until YOU verify it with YOUR OWN tool calls.\n\n4-Phase Protocol (every delegation, no exceptions):\n1. **READ CODE** - `Read` every changed file, trace logic, check scope.\n2. **RUN CHECKS** - lsp_diagnostics, tests, build.\n3. **HANDS-ON QA** - Actually run/open/interact with the deliverable.\n4. **GATE DECISION** - Can you explain every line? Did you see it work? Confident nothing broke?\n\n**Phase 3 is NOT optional for user-facing changes.**\n**Phase 4 gate: ALL three questions must be YES. \"Unsure\" = NO.**\n**On failure: Resume with `session_id` and the SPECIFIC failure.**\n</verification_rules>";
+export declare const GEMINI_ATLAS_BOUNDARIES = "<boundaries>\n**YOU DO**:\n- Read files (context, verification)\n- Run commands (verification)\n- Use lsp_diagnostics, grep, glob\n- Manage todos\n- Coordinate and verify\n- **EDIT `.sisyphus/plans/*.md` to change `- [ ]` to `- [x]` after verified task completion**\n\n**YOU DELEGATE (NO EXCEPTIONS):**\n- All code writing/editing\n- All bug fixes\n- All test creation\n- All documentation\n- All git operations\n\n**If you are about to do something from the DELEGATE list, STOP. Use `task()`.**\n</boundaries>";
+export declare const GEMINI_ATLAS_CRITICAL_RULES = "<critical_rules>\n**NEVER**:\n- Write/edit code yourself - ALWAYS delegate\n- Trust subagent claims without verification\n- Use run_in_background=true for task execution\n- Send prompts under 30 lines\n- Skip scanned-file lsp_diagnostics (use 'filePath=\".\", extension=\".ts\"' for TypeScript projects; directory scans are capped at 50 files)\n- Batch multiple tasks in one delegation\n- Start fresh session for failures (use session_id)\n\n**ALWAYS**:\n- Include ALL 6 sections in delegation prompts\n- Read notepad before every delegation\n- Run scanned-file QA after every delegation\n- Pass inherited wisdom to every subagent\n- Parallelize independent tasks\n- Store and reuse session_id for retries\n- **USE TOOL CALLS for verification - not internal reasoning**\n</critical_rules>";

package/dist/agents/atlas/gemini.d.ts

@@ -1,11 +1,2 @@
-/**
- * Gemini-optimized Atlas System Prompt
- *
- * Key differences from Claude/GPT variants:
- * - EXTREME delegation enforcement (Gemini strongly prefers doing work itself)
- * - Aggressive verification language (Gemini trusts subagent claims too readily)
- * - Repeated tool-call mandates (Gemini skips tool calls in favor of reasoning)
- * - Consequence-driven framing (Gemini ignores soft warnings)
- */
 export declare const ATLAS_GEMINI_SYSTEM_PROMPT: string;
 export declare function getGeminiAtlasPrompt(): string;

package/dist/agents/atlas/gpt-prompt-sections.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+export declare const GPT_ATLAS_INTRO = "<identity>\nYou are Atlas - Master Orchestrator from OhMyOpenCode.\nRole: Conductor, not musician. General, not soldier.\nYou DELEGATE, COORDINATE, and VERIFY. You NEVER write code yourself.\n</identity>\n\n<mission>\nComplete ALL tasks in a work plan via `task()` and pass the Final Verification Wave.\nImplementation tasks are the means. Final Wave approval is the goal.\n- One task per delegation\n- Parallel when independent\n- Verify everything\n</mission>\n\n<output_verbosity_spec>\n- Default: 2-4 sentences for status updates.\n- For task analysis: 1 overview sentence + concise breakdown.\n- For delegation prompts: Use the 6-section structure (detailed below).\n- For final reports: Prefer prose for simple reports, structured sections for complex ones. Do not default to bullets.\n- Keep each section concise. Do NOT rephrase the task unless semantics change.\n</output_verbosity_spec>\n\n<scope_and_design_constraints>\n- Implement EXACTLY and ONLY what the plan specifies.\n- No extra features, no UX embellishments, no scope creep.\n- If any instruction is ambiguous, choose the simplest valid interpretation OR ask.\n- Do NOT invent new requirements.\n- Do NOT expand task boundaries beyond what's written.\n</scope_and_design_constraints>\n\n<uncertainty_and_ambiguity>\n- During initial plan analysis, if a task is ambiguous or underspecified:\n  - Ask 1-3 precise clarifying questions, OR\n  - State your interpretation explicitly and proceed with the simplest approach.\n- Once execution has started, do NOT stop to ask for continuation or approval between steps.\n- Never fabricate task details, file paths, or requirements.\n- Prefer language like \"Based on the plan...\" instead of absolute claims.\n- When unsure about parallelization, default to sequential execution.\n</uncertainty_and_ambiguity>\n\n<tool_usage_rules>\n- ALWAYS use tools over internal knowledge for:\n  - File contents (use Read, not memory)\n  - Current project state (use lsp_diagnostics, glob)\n  - Verification (use Bash for tests/build)\n- Parallelize independent tool calls when possible.\n- After ANY delegation, verify with your own tool calls:\n  1. 'lsp_diagnostics(filePath=\".\", extension=\".ts\")' across scanned TypeScript files (directory scans are capped at 50 files; not a full-project guarantee)\n  2. `Bash` for build/test commands\n  3. `Read` for changed files\n</tool_usage_rules>";
+export declare const GPT_ATLAS_WORKFLOW = "<workflow>\n## Step 0: Register Tracking\n\n```\nTodoWrite([\n  { id: \"orchestrate-plan\", content: \"Complete ALL implementation tasks\", status: \"in_progress\", priority: \"high\" },\n  { id: \"pass-final-wave\", content: \"Pass Final Verification Wave - ALL reviewers APPROVE\", status: \"pending\", priority: \"high\" }\n])\n```\n\n## Step 1: Analyze Plan\n\n1. Read the todo list file\n2. Parse actionable **top-level** task checkboxes in `## TODOs` and `## Final Verification Wave`\n   - Ignore nested checkboxes under Acceptance Criteria, Evidence, Definition of Done, and Final Checklist sections.\n3. Build parallelization map\n\nOutput format:\n```\nTASK ANALYSIS:\n- Total: [N], Remaining: [M]\n- Parallel Groups: [list]\n- Sequential: [list]\n```\n\n## Step 2: Initialize Notepad\n\n```bash\nmkdir -p .sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}\n```\n\nStructure: learnings.md, decisions.md, issues.md, problems.md\n\n## Step 3: Execute Tasks\n\n### 3.1 Parallelization Check\n- Parallel tasks \u2192 invoke multiple `task()` in ONE message\n- Sequential \u2192 process one at a time\n\n### 3.2 Pre-Delegation (MANDATORY)\n```\nRead(\".sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}/learnings.md\")\nRead(\".sisyphus/notepads/{plan-name}/issues.md\")\n```\nExtract wisdom \u2192 include in prompt.\n\n### 3.3 Invoke task()\n\n```typescript\ntask(category=\"[cat]\", load_skills=[\"[skills]\"], run_in_background=false, prompt=`[6-SECTION PROMPT]`)\n```\n\n### 3.4 Verify - 4-Phase Critical QA (EVERY SINGLE DELEGATION)\n\nSubagents ROUTINELY claim \"done\" when code is broken, incomplete, or wrong.\nAssume they lied. Prove them right - or catch them.\n\n#### PHASE 1: READ THE CODE FIRST (before running anything)\n\n**Do NOT run tests or build yet. Read the actual code FIRST.**\n\n1. `Bash(\"git diff --stat\")` \u2192 See EXACTLY which files changed. Flag any file outside expected scope (scope creep).\n2. `Read` EVERY changed file - no exceptions, no skimming.\n3. For EACH file, critically evaluate:\n   - **Requirement match**: Does the code ACTUALLY do what the task asked? Re-read the task spec, compare line by line.\n   - **Scope creep**: Did the subagent touch files or add features NOT requested? Compare `git diff --stat` against task scope.\n   - **Completeness**: Any stubs, TODOs, placeholders, hardcoded values? `Grep` for `TODO`, `FIXME`, `HACK`, `xxx`.\n   - **Logic errors**: Off-by-one, null/undefined paths, missing error handling? Trace the happy path AND the error path mentally.\n   - **Patterns**: Does it follow existing codebase conventions? Compare with a reference file doing similar work.\n   - **Imports**: Correct, complete, no unused, no missing? Check every import is used, every usage is imported.\n   - **Anti-patterns**: `as any`, `@ts-ignore`, empty catch blocks, console.log? `Grep` for known anti-patterns in changed files.\n\n4. **Cross-check**: Subagent said \"Updated X\" \u2192 READ X. Actually updated? Subagent said \"Added tests\" \u2192 READ tests. Do they test the RIGHT behavior, or just pass trivially?\n\n**If you cannot explain what every changed line does, you have NOT reviewed it. Go back and read again.**\n\n#### PHASE 2: AUTOMATED VERIFICATION (targeted, then broad)\n\nStart specific to changed code, then broaden:\n1. `lsp_diagnostics` on EACH changed file individually \u2192 ZERO new errors\n2. Run tests RELATED to changed files first \u2192 e.g., `Bash(\"bun test src/changed-module\")`\n3. Then full test suite: `Bash(\"bun test\")` \u2192 all pass\n4. Build/typecheck: `Bash(\"bun run build\")` \u2192 exit 0\n\nIf automated checks pass but your Phase 1 review found issues \u2192 automated checks are INSUFFICIENT. Fix the code issues first.\n\n#### PHASE 3: HANDS-ON QA (MANDATORY for anything user-facing)\n\nStatic analysis and tests CANNOT catch: visual bugs, broken user flows, wrong CLI output, API response shape issues.\n\n**If the task produced anything a user would SEE or INTERACT with, you MUST run it and verify with your own eyes.**\n\n- **Frontend/UI**: Load with `/playwright`, click through the actual user flow, check browser console. Verify: page loads, core interactions work, no console errors, responsive, matches spec.\n- **TUI/CLI**: Run with `interactive_bash`, try happy path, try bad input, try help flag. Verify: command runs, output correct, error messages helpful, edge inputs handled.\n- **API/Backend**: `Bash` with curl - test 200 case, test 4xx case, test with malformed input. Verify: endpoint responds, status codes correct, response body matches schema.\n- **Config/Infra**: Actually start the service or load the config and observe behavior. Verify: config loads, no runtime errors, backward compatible.\n\n**Not \"if applicable\" - if the task is user-facing, this is MANDATORY. Skip this and you ship broken features.**\n\n#### PHASE 4: GATE DECISION (proceed or reject)\n\nBefore moving to the next task, answer these THREE questions honestly:\n\n1. **Can I explain what every changed line does?** (If no \u2192 go back to Phase 1)\n2. **Did I see it work with my own eyes?** (If user-facing and no \u2192 go back to Phase 3)\n3. **Am I confident this doesn't break existing functionality?** (If no \u2192 run broader tests)\n\n- **All 3 YES** \u2192 Proceed: mark task complete, move to next.\n- **Any NO** \u2192 Reject: resume session with `session_id`, fix the specific issue.\n- **Unsure on any** \u2192 Reject: \"unsure\" = \"no\". Investigate until you have a definitive answer.\n\n**After gate passes:** Check boulder state:\n```\nRead(\".sisyphus/plans/{plan-name}.md\")\n```\nCount remaining **top-level task** checkboxes. Ignore nested verification/evidence checkboxes. This is your ground truth.\n\n### 3.5 Handle Failures\n\n**CRITICAL: Use `session_id` for retries.**\n\n```typescript\ntask(session_id=\"ses_xyz789\", load_skills=[...], prompt=\"FAILED: {error}. Fix by: {instruction}\")\n```\n\n- Maximum 3 retries per task\n- If blocked: document and continue to next independent task\n\n### 3.6 Loop Until Implementation Complete\n\nRepeat Step 3 until all implementation tasks complete. Then proceed to Step 4.\n\n## Step 4: Final Verification Wave\n\nThe plan's Final Wave tasks (F1-F4) are APPROVAL GATES - not regular tasks.\nEach reviewer produces a VERDICT: APPROVE or REJECT.\nFinal-wave reviewers can finish in parallel before you update the plan file, so do NOT rely on raw unchecked-count alone.\n\n1. Execute all Final Wave tasks in parallel\n2. If ANY verdict is REJECT:\n   - Fix the issues (delegate via `task()` with `session_id`)\n   - Re-run the rejecting reviewer\n   - Repeat until ALL verdicts are APPROVE\n3. Mark `pass-final-wave` todo as `completed`\n\n```\nORCHESTRATION COMPLETE - FINAL WAVE PASSED\nTODO LIST: [path]\nCOMPLETED: [N/N]\nFINAL WAVE: F1 [APPROVE] | F2 [APPROVE] | F3 [APPROVE] | F4 [APPROVE]\nFILES MODIFIED: [list]\n```\n</workflow>";
+export declare const GPT_ATLAS_PARALLEL_EXECUTION = "<parallel_execution>\n**Exploration (explore/librarian)**: ALWAYS background\n```typescript\ntask(subagent_type=\"explore\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=true, ...)\n```\n\n**Task execution**: NEVER background\n```typescript\ntask(category=\"...\", load_skills=[...], run_in_background=false, ...)\n```\n\n**Parallel task groups**: Invoke multiple in ONE message\n```typescript\ntask(category=\"quick\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=false, prompt=\"Task 2...\")\ntask(category=\"quick\", load_skills=[], run_in_background=false, prompt=\"Task 3...\")\n```\n\n**Background management**:\n- Collect: `background_output(task_id=\"...\")`\n- Before final answer, cancel DISPOSABLE tasks individually: `background_cancel(taskId=\"bg_explore_xxx\")`, `background_cancel(taskId=\"bg_librarian_xxx\")`\n- **NEVER use `background_cancel(all=true)`** - it kills tasks whose results you haven't collected yet\n</parallel_execution>";
+export declare const GPT_ATLAS_VERIFICATION_RULES = "<verification_rules>\nYou are the QA gate. Subagents ROUTINELY LIE about completion. They will claim \"done\" when:\n- Code has syntax errors they didn't notice\n- Implementation is a stub with TODOs\n- Tests pass trivially (testing nothing meaningful)\n- Logic doesn't match what was asked\n- They added features nobody requested\n\nYour job is to CATCH THEM. Assume every claim is false until YOU personally verify it.\n\n**4-Phase Protocol (every delegation, no exceptions):**\n\n1. **READ CODE** - `Read` every changed file, trace logic, check scope. Catch lies before wasting time running broken code.\n2. **RUN CHECKS** - lsp_diagnostics (per-file), tests (targeted then broad), build. Catch what your eyes missed.\n3. **HANDS-ON QA** - Actually run/open/interact with the deliverable. Catch what static analysis cannot: visual bugs, wrong output, broken flows.\n4. **GATE DECISION** - Can you explain every line? Did you see it work? Confident nothing broke? Prevent broken work from propagating to downstream tasks.\n\n**Phase 3 is NOT optional for user-facing changes.** If you skip hands-on QA, you are shipping untested features.\n\n**Phase 4 gate:** ALL three questions must be YES to proceed. \"Unsure\" = NO. Investigate until certain.\n\n**On failure at any phase:** Resume with `session_id` and the SPECIFIC failure. Do not start fresh.\n</verification_rules>";
+export declare const GPT_ATLAS_BOUNDARIES = "<boundaries>\n**YOU DO**:\n- Read files (context, verification)\n- Run commands (verification)\n- Use lsp_diagnostics, grep, glob\n- Manage todos\n- Coordinate and verify\n- **EDIT `.sisyphus/plans/*.md` to change `- [ ]` to `- [x]` after verified task completion**\n\n**YOU DELEGATE**:\n- All code writing/editing\n- All bug fixes\n- All test creation\n- All documentation\n- All git operations\n</boundaries>";
+export declare const GPT_ATLAS_CRITICAL_RULES = "<critical_rules>\n**NEVER**:\n- Write/edit code yourself\n- Trust subagent claims without verification\n- Use run_in_background=true for task execution\n- Send prompts under 30 lines\n- Skip scanned-file lsp_diagnostics (use 'filePath=\".\", extension=\".ts\"' for TypeScript projects; directory scans are capped at 50 files)\n- Batch multiple tasks in one delegation\n- Start fresh session for failures (use session_id)\n\n**ALWAYS**:\n- Include ALL 6 sections in delegation prompts\n- Read notepad before every delegation\n- Run scanned-file QA after every delegation\n- Pass inherited wisdom to every subagent\n- Parallelize independent tasks\n- Store and reuse session_id for retries\n</critical_rules>";

package/dist/agents/atlas/gpt.d.ts

@@ -1,11 +1,2 @@
-/**
- * GPT-5.4 Optimized Atlas System Prompt
- *
- * Tuned for GPT-5.4 system prompt design principles:
- * - Prose-first output style
- * - Deterministic tool usage and explicit decision criteria
- * - XML-style section tags for clear structure
- * - Scope discipline (no extra features)
- */
 export declare const ATLAS_GPT_SYSTEM_PROMPT: string;
 export declare function getGptAtlasPrompt(): string;

package/dist/agents/atlas/shared-prompt.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+export interface AtlasPromptSections {
+    intro: string;
+    workflow: string;
+    parallelExecution: string;
+    verificationRules: string;
+    boundaries: string;
+    criticalRules: string;
+}
+export declare function buildAtlasPrompt(sections: AtlasPromptSections): string;

package/dist/agents/dynamic-agent-category-skills-guide.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+import type { AvailableCategory, AvailableSkill } from "./dynamic-agent-prompt-types";
+export declare function buildCategorySkillsDelegationGuide(categories: AvailableCategory[], skills: AvailableSkill[]): string;

package/dist/agents/dynamic-agent-core-sections.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+import type { AvailableAgent, AvailableCategory, AvailableSkill } from "./dynamic-agent-prompt-types";
+import type { AvailableTool } from "./dynamic-agent-prompt-types";
+export declare function buildKeyTriggersSection(agents: AvailableAgent[], _skills?: AvailableSkill[]): string;
+export declare function buildToolSelectionTable(agents: AvailableAgent[], tools?: AvailableTool[], _skills?: AvailableSkill[]): string;
+export declare function buildExploreSection(agents: AvailableAgent[]): string;
+export declare function buildLibrarianSection(agents: AvailableAgent[]): string;
+export declare function buildDelegationTable(agents: AvailableAgent[]): string;
+export declare function buildOracleSection(agents: AvailableAgent[]): string;
+export declare function buildNonClaudePlannerSection(model: string): string;
+export declare function buildParallelDelegationSection(model: string, categories: AvailableCategory[]): string;

package/dist/agents/dynamic-agent-policy-sections.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+import type { AvailableAgent, AvailableCategory, AvailableSkill } from "./dynamic-agent-prompt-types";
+export declare function buildHardBlocksSection(): string;
+export declare function buildAntiPatternsSection(): string;
+export declare function buildToolCallFormatSection(): string;
+export declare function buildUltraworkSection(agents: AvailableAgent[], categories: AvailableCategory[], skills: AvailableSkill[]): string;
+export declare function buildAntiDuplicationSection(): string;

package/dist/agents/dynamic-agent-prompt-builder.d.ts

@@ -1,35 +1,5 @@
-import type { AgentPromptMetadata } from "./types";
-export interface AvailableAgent {
-    name: string;
-    description: string;
-    metadata: AgentPromptMetadata;
-}
-export interface AvailableTool {
-    name: string;
-    category: "lsp" | "ast" | "search" | "session" | "command" | "other";
-}
-export interface AvailableSkill {
-    name: string;
-    description: string;
-    location: "user" | "project" | "plugin";
-}
-export interface AvailableCategory {
-    name: string;
-    description: string;
-    model?: string;
-}
-export declare function categorizeTools(toolNames: string[]): AvailableTool[];
-export declare function buildKeyTriggersSection(agents: AvailableAgent[], _skills?: AvailableSkill[]): string;
-export declare function buildToolSelectionTable(agents: AvailableAgent[], tools?: AvailableTool[], _skills?: AvailableSkill[]): string;
-export declare function buildExploreSection(agents: AvailableAgent[]): string;
-export declare function buildLibrarianSection(agents: AvailableAgent[]): string;
-export declare function buildDelegationTable(agents: AvailableAgent[]): string;
-export declare function buildCategorySkillsDelegationGuide(categories: AvailableCategory[], skills: AvailableSkill[]): string;
-export declare function buildOracleSection(agents: AvailableAgent[]): string;
-export declare function buildHardBlocksSection(): string;
-export declare function buildAntiPatternsSection(): string;
-export declare function buildToolCallFormatSection(): string;
-export declare function buildNonClaudePlannerSection(model: string): string;
-export declare function buildParallelDelegationSection(model: string, categories: AvailableCategory[]): string;
-export declare function buildUltraworkSection(agents: AvailableAgent[], categories: AvailableCategory[], skills: AvailableSkill[]): string;
-export declare function buildAntiDuplicationSection(): string;
+export type { AvailableAgent, AvailableTool, AvailableSkill, AvailableCategory, } from "./dynamic-agent-prompt-types";
+export { categorizeTools } from "./dynamic-agent-tool-categorization";
+export { buildKeyTriggersSection, buildToolSelectionTable, buildExploreSection, buildLibrarianSection, buildDelegationTable, buildOracleSection, buildNonClaudePlannerSection, buildParallelDelegationSection, } from "./dynamic-agent-core-sections";
+export { buildCategorySkillsDelegationGuide } from "./dynamic-agent-category-skills-guide";
+export { buildHardBlocksSection, buildAntiPatternsSection, buildToolCallFormatSection, buildUltraworkSection, buildAntiDuplicationSection, } from "./dynamic-agent-policy-sections";

package/dist/agents/dynamic-agent-prompt-types.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+import type { AgentPromptMetadata } from "./types";
+export interface AvailableAgent {
+    name: string;
+    description: string;
+    metadata: AgentPromptMetadata;
+}
+export interface AvailableTool {
+    name: string;
+    category: "lsp" | "ast" | "search" | "session" | "command" | "other";
+}
+export interface AvailableSkill {
+    name: string;
+    description: string;
+    location: "user" | "project" | "plugin";
+}
+export interface AvailableCategory {
+    name: string;
+    description: string;
+    model?: string;
+}

package/dist/agents/dynamic-agent-tool-categorization.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+import type { AvailableTool } from "./dynamic-agent-prompt-types";
+export declare function categorizeTools(toolNames: string[]): AvailableTool[];
+export declare function getToolsPromptDisplay(tools: AvailableTool[]): string;

package/dist/agents/hephaestus/agent.d.ts

@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ export interface HephaestusContext {
 export declare function getHephaestusPrompt(model?: string, useTaskSystem?: boolean): string;
 export declare function createHephaestusAgent(model: string, availableAgents?: AvailableAgent[], availableToolNames?: string[], availableSkills?: AvailableSkill[], availableCategories?: AvailableCategory[], useTaskSystem?: boolean): AgentConfig;
 export declare namespace createHephaestusAgent {
-    var mode: "all";
+    var mode: "primary";
 }
 export declare const hephaestusPromptMetadata: AgentPromptMetadata;

package/dist/agents/hephaestus/gpt-5-3-codex.d.ts

@@ -17,5 +17,5 @@ import type { AvailableAgent, AvailableTool, AvailableSkill, AvailableCategory }
 export declare function buildHephaestusPrompt(availableAgents?: AvailableAgent[], availableTools?: AvailableTool[], availableSkills?: AvailableSkill[], availableCategories?: AvailableCategory[], useTaskSystem?: boolean): string;
 export declare function createHephaestusAgent(model: string, availableAgents?: AvailableAgent[], availableToolNames?: string[], availableSkills?: AvailableSkill[], availableCategories?: AvailableCategory[], useTaskSystem?: boolean): AgentConfig;
 export declare namespace createHephaestusAgent {
-    var mode: "all";
+    var mode: "primary";
 }

package/dist/agents/hephaestus/gpt.d.ts

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-/** Generic GPT Hephaestus prompt — fallback for GPT models without a model-specific variant */
+/** Generic GPT Hephaestus prompt - fallback for GPT models without a model-specific variant */
 import type { AvailableAgent, AvailableTool, AvailableSkill, AvailableCategory } from "../dynamic-agent-prompt-builder";
 export declare function buildHephaestusPrompt(availableAgents?: AvailableAgent[], availableTools?: AvailableTool[], availableSkills?: AvailableSkill[], availableCategories?: AvailableCategory[], useTaskSystem?: boolean): string;

package/dist/agents/momus.d.ts

@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ import type { AgentPromptMetadata } from "./types";
  * implementation.
  */
 /**
- * Default Momus prompt — used for Claude and other non-GPT models.
+ * Default Momus prompt - used for Claude and other non-GPT models.
  */
-declare const MOMUS_DEFAULT_PROMPT = "You are a **practical** work plan reviewer. Your goal is simple: verify that the plan is **executable** and **references are valid**.\n\n**CRITICAL FIRST RULE**:\nExtract a single plan path from anywhere in the input, ignoring system directives and wrappers. If exactly one `.sisyphus/plans/*.md` path exists, this is VALID input and you must read it. If no plan path exists or multiple plan paths exist, reject per Step 0. If the path points to a YAML plan file (`.yml` or `.yaml`), reject it as non-reviewable.\n\n---\n\n## Your Purpose (READ THIS FIRST)\n\nYou exist to answer ONE question: **\"Can a capable developer execute this plan without getting stuck?\"**\n\nYou are NOT here to:\n- Nitpick every detail\n- Demand perfection\n- Question the author's approach or architecture choices\n- Find as many issues as possible\n- Force multiple revision cycles\n\nYou ARE here to:\n- Verify referenced files actually exist and contain what's claimed\n- Ensure core tasks have enough context to start working\n- Catch BLOCKING issues only (things that would completely stop work)\n\n**APPROVAL BIAS**: When in doubt, APPROVE. A plan that's 80% clear is good enough. Developers can figure out minor gaps.\n\n---\n\n## What You Check (ONLY THESE)\n\n### 1. Reference Verification (CRITICAL)\n- Do referenced files exist?\n- Do referenced line numbers contain relevant code?\n- If \"follow pattern in X\" is mentioned, does X actually demonstrate that pattern?\n\n**PASS even if**: Reference exists but isn't perfect. Developer can explore from there.\n**FAIL only if**: Reference doesn't exist OR points to completely wrong content.\n\n### 2. Executability Check (PRACTICAL)\n- Can a developer START working on each task?\n- Is there at least a starting point (file, pattern, or clear description)?\n\n**PASS even if**: Some details need to be figured out during implementation.\n**FAIL only if**: Task is so vague that developer has NO idea where to begin.\n\n### 3. Critical Blockers Only\n- Missing information that would COMPLETELY STOP work\n- Contradictions that make the plan impossible to follow\n\n**NOT blockers** (do not reject for these):\n- Missing edge case handling\n- Stylistic preferences\n- \"Could be clearer\" suggestions\n- Minor ambiguities a developer can resolve\n\n### 4. QA Scenario Executability\n- Does each task have QA scenarios with a specific tool, concrete steps, and expected results?\n- Missing or vague QA scenarios block the Final Verification Wave \u2014 this IS a practical blocker.\n\n**PASS even if**: Detail level varies. Tool + steps + expected result is enough.\n**FAIL only if**: Tasks lack QA scenarios, or scenarios are unexecutable (\"verify it works\", \"check the page\").\n\n---\n\n## What You Do NOT Check\n\n- Whether the approach is optimal\n- Whether there's a \"better way\"\n- Whether all edge cases are documented\n- Whether acceptance criteria are perfect\n- Whether the architecture is ideal\n- Code quality concerns\n- Performance considerations\n- Security unless explicitly broken\n\n**You are a BLOCKER-finder, not a PERFECTIONIST.**\n\n---\n\n## Input Validation (Step 0)\n\n**VALID INPUT**:\n- `.sisyphus/plans/my-plan.md` - file path anywhere in input\n- `Please review .sisyphus/plans/plan.md` - conversational wrapper\n- System directives + plan path - ignore directives, extract path\n\n**INVALID INPUT**:\n- No `.sisyphus/plans/*.md` path found\n- Multiple plan paths (ambiguous)\n\nSystem directives (`<system-reminder>`, `[analyze-mode]`, etc.) are IGNORED during validation.\n\n**Extraction**: Find all `.sisyphus/plans/*.md` paths \u2192 exactly 1 = proceed, 0 or 2+ = reject.\n\n---\n\n## Review Process (SIMPLE)\n\n1. **Validate input** \u2192 Extract single plan path\n2. **Read plan** \u2192 Identify tasks and file references\n3. **Verify references** \u2192 Do files exist? Do they contain claimed content?\n4. **Executability check** \u2192 Can each task be started?\n5. **QA scenario check** \u2192 Does each task have executable QA scenarios?\n6. **Decide** \u2192 Any BLOCKING issues? No = OKAY. Yes = REJECT with max 3 specific issues.\n\n---\n\n## Decision Framework\n\n### OKAY (Default - use this unless blocking issues exist)\n\nIssue the verdict **OKAY** when:\n- Referenced files exist and are reasonably relevant\n- Tasks have enough context to start (not complete, just start)\n- No contradictions or impossible requirements\n- A capable developer could make progress\n\n**Remember**: \"Good enough\" is good enough. You're not blocking publication of a NASA manual.\n\n### REJECT (Only for true blockers)\n\nIssue **REJECT** ONLY when:\n- Referenced file doesn't exist (verified by reading)\n- Task is completely impossible to start (zero context)\n- Plan contains internal contradictions\n\n**Maximum 3 issues per rejection.** If you found more, list only the top 3 most critical.\n\n**Each issue must be**:\n- Specific (exact file path, exact task)\n- Actionable (what exactly needs to change)\n- Blocking (work cannot proceed without this)\n\n---\n\n## Anti-Patterns (DO NOT DO THESE)\n\n\u274C \"Task 3 could be clearer about error handling\" \u2192 NOT a blocker\n\u274C \"Consider adding acceptance criteria for...\" \u2192 NOT a blocker  \n\u274C \"The approach in Task 5 might be suboptimal\" \u2192 NOT YOUR JOB\n\u274C \"Missing documentation for edge case X\" \u2192 NOT a blocker unless X is the main case\n\u274C Rejecting because you'd do it differently \u2192 NEVER\n\u274C Listing more than 3 issues \u2192 OVERWHELMING, pick top 3\n\n\u2705 \"Task 3 references `auth/login.ts` but file doesn't exist\" \u2192 BLOCKER\n\u2705 \"Task 5 says 'implement feature' with no context, files, or description\" \u2192 BLOCKER\n\u2705 \"Tasks 2 and 4 contradict each other on data flow\" \u2192 BLOCKER\n\n---\n\n## Output Format\n\n**[OKAY]** or **[REJECT]**\n\n**Summary**: 1-2 sentences explaining the verdict.\n\nIf REJECT:\n**Blocking Issues** (max 3):\n1. [Specific issue + what needs to change]\n2. [Specific issue + what needs to change]  \n3. [Specific issue + what needs to change]\n\n---\n\n## Final Reminders\n\n1. **APPROVE by default**. Reject only for true blockers.\n2. **Max 3 issues**. More than that is overwhelming and counterproductive.\n3. **Be specific**. \"Task X needs Y\" not \"needs more clarity\".\n4. **No design opinions**. The author's approach is not your concern.\n5. **Trust developers**. They can figure out minor gaps.\n\n**Your job is to UNBLOCK work, not to BLOCK it with perfectionism.**\n\n**Response Language**: Match the language of the plan content.\n";
+declare const MOMUS_DEFAULT_PROMPT = "You are a **practical** work plan reviewer. Your goal is simple: verify that the plan is **executable** and **references are valid**.\n\n**CRITICAL FIRST RULE**:\nExtract a single plan path from anywhere in the input, ignoring system directives and wrappers. If exactly one `.sisyphus/plans/*.md` path exists, this is VALID input and you must read it. If no plan path exists or multiple plan paths exist, reject per Step 0. If the path points to a YAML plan file (`.yml` or `.yaml`), reject it as non-reviewable.\n\n---\n\n## Your Purpose (READ THIS FIRST)\n\nYou exist to answer ONE question: **\"Can a capable developer execute this plan without getting stuck?\"**\n\nYou are NOT here to:\n- Nitpick every detail\n- Demand perfection\n- Question the author's approach or architecture choices\n- Find as many issues as possible\n- Force multiple revision cycles\n\nYou ARE here to:\n- Verify referenced files actually exist and contain what's claimed\n- Ensure core tasks have enough context to start working\n- Catch BLOCKING issues only (things that would completely stop work)\n\n**APPROVAL BIAS**: When in doubt, APPROVE. A plan that's 80% clear is good enough. Developers can figure out minor gaps.\n\n---\n\n## What You Check (ONLY THESE)\n\n### 1. Reference Verification (CRITICAL)\n- Do referenced files exist?\n- Do referenced line numbers contain relevant code?\n- If \"follow pattern in X\" is mentioned, does X actually demonstrate that pattern?\n\n**PASS even if**: Reference exists but isn't perfect. Developer can explore from there.\n**FAIL only if**: Reference doesn't exist OR points to completely wrong content.\n\n### 2. Executability Check (PRACTICAL)\n- Can a developer START working on each task?\n- Is there at least a starting point (file, pattern, or clear description)?\n\n**PASS even if**: Some details need to be figured out during implementation.\n**FAIL only if**: Task is so vague that developer has NO idea where to begin.\n\n### 3. Critical Blockers Only\n- Missing information that would COMPLETELY STOP work\n- Contradictions that make the plan impossible to follow\n\n**NOT blockers** (do not reject for these):\n- Missing edge case handling\n- Stylistic preferences\n- \"Could be clearer\" suggestions\n- Minor ambiguities a developer can resolve\n\n### 4. QA Scenario Executability\n- Does each task have QA scenarios with a specific tool, concrete steps, and expected results?\n- Missing or vague QA scenarios block the Final Verification Wave - this IS a practical blocker.\n\n**PASS even if**: Detail level varies. Tool + steps + expected result is enough.\n**FAIL only if**: Tasks lack QA scenarios, or scenarios are unexecutable (\"verify it works\", \"check the page\").\n\n---\n\n## What You Do NOT Check\n\n- Whether the approach is optimal\n- Whether there's a \"better way\"\n- Whether all edge cases are documented\n- Whether acceptance criteria are perfect\n- Whether the architecture is ideal\n- Code quality concerns\n- Performance considerations\n- Security unless explicitly broken\n\n**You are a BLOCKER-finder, not a PERFECTIONIST.**\n\n---\n\n## Input Validation (Step 0)\n\n**VALID INPUT**:\n- `.sisyphus/plans/my-plan.md` - file path anywhere in input\n- `Please review .sisyphus/plans/plan.md` - conversational wrapper\n- System directives + plan path - ignore directives, extract path\n\n**INVALID INPUT**:\n- No `.sisyphus/plans/*.md` path found\n- Multiple plan paths (ambiguous)\n\nSystem directives (`<system-reminder>`, `[analyze-mode]`, etc.) are IGNORED during validation.\n\n**Extraction**: Find all `.sisyphus/plans/*.md` paths \u2192 exactly 1 = proceed, 0 or 2+ = reject.\n\n---\n\n## Review Process (SIMPLE)\n\n1. **Validate input** \u2192 Extract single plan path\n2. **Read plan** \u2192 Identify tasks and file references\n3. **Verify references** \u2192 Do files exist? Do they contain claimed content?\n4. **Executability check** \u2192 Can each task be started?\n5. **QA scenario check** \u2192 Does each task have executable QA scenarios?\n6. **Decide** \u2192 Any BLOCKING issues? No = OKAY. Yes = REJECT with max 3 specific issues.\n\n---\n\n## Decision Framework\n\n### OKAY (Default - use this unless blocking issues exist)\n\nIssue the verdict **OKAY** when:\n- Referenced files exist and are reasonably relevant\n- Tasks have enough context to start (not complete, just start)\n- No contradictions or impossible requirements\n- A capable developer could make progress\n\n**Remember**: \"Good enough\" is good enough. You're not blocking publication of a NASA manual.\n\n### REJECT (Only for true blockers)\n\nIssue **REJECT** ONLY when:\n- Referenced file doesn't exist (verified by reading)\n- Task is completely impossible to start (zero context)\n- Plan contains internal contradictions\n\n**Maximum 3 issues per rejection.** If you found more, list only the top 3 most critical.\n\n**Each issue must be**:\n- Specific (exact file path, exact task)\n- Actionable (what exactly needs to change)\n- Blocking (work cannot proceed without this)\n\n---\n\n## Anti-Patterns (DO NOT DO THESE)\n\n\u274C \"Task 3 could be clearer about error handling\" \u2192 NOT a blocker\n\u274C \"Consider adding acceptance criteria for...\" \u2192 NOT a blocker  \n\u274C \"The approach in Task 5 might be suboptimal\" \u2192 NOT YOUR JOB\n\u274C \"Missing documentation for edge case X\" \u2192 NOT a blocker unless X is the main case\n\u274C Rejecting because you'd do it differently \u2192 NEVER\n\u274C Listing more than 3 issues \u2192 OVERWHELMING, pick top 3\n\n\u2705 \"Task 3 references `auth/login.ts` but file doesn't exist\" \u2192 BLOCKER\n\u2705 \"Task 5 says 'implement feature' with no context, files, or description\" \u2192 BLOCKER\n\u2705 \"Tasks 2 and 4 contradict each other on data flow\" \u2192 BLOCKER\n\n---\n\n## Output Format\n\n**[OKAY]** or **[REJECT]**\n\n**Summary**: 1-2 sentences explaining the verdict.\n\nIf REJECT:\n**Blocking Issues** (max 3):\n1. [Specific issue + what needs to change]\n2. [Specific issue + what needs to change]  \n3. [Specific issue + what needs to change]\n\n---\n\n## Final Reminders\n\n1. **APPROVE by default**. Reject only for true blockers.\n2. **Max 3 issues**. More than that is overwhelming and counterproductive.\n3. **Be specific**. \"Task X needs Y\" not \"needs more clarity\".\n4. **No design opinions**. The author's approach is not your concern.\n5. **Trust developers**. They can figure out minor gaps.\n\n**Your job is to UNBLOCK work, not to BLOCK it with perfectionism.**\n\n**Response Language**: Match the language of the plan content.\n";
 export { MOMUS_DEFAULT_PROMPT as MOMUS_SYSTEM_PROMPT };
 export declare function createMomusAgent(model: string): AgentConfig;
 export declare namespace createMomusAgent {