oh-my-customcode 0.59.1 → 0.60.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +3 -3
- package/dist/cli/index.js +1 -1
- package/dist/index.js +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/templates/.claude/rules/MUST-agent-design.md +3 -1
- package/templates/.claude/rules/MUST-agent-teams.md +9 -0
- package/templates/.claude/skills/action-validator/SKILL.md +75 -0
- package/templates/.claude/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md +8 -0
- package/templates/.claude/skills/evaluator-optimizer/SKILL.md +56 -0
- package/templates/.claude/skills/monitoring-setup/SKILL.md +29 -0
- package/templates/.claude/skills/peer-messaging/SKILL.md +59 -0
- package/templates/.claude/skills/stuck-recovery/SKILL.md +24 -0
- package/templates/.claude/skills/workflow/SKILL.md +8 -8
- package/templates/CLAUDE.md +1 -1
- package/templates/manifest.json +2 -2
- package/templates/workflows/{omcustom-dev.yaml → auto-dev.yaml} +8 -4
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
|
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
14
|
**[한국어 문서 (Korean)](./README_ko.md)**
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
|
-
46 agents.
|
|
16
|
+
46 agents. 97 skills. 21 rules. One command.
|
|
17
17
|
|
|
18
18
|
```bash
|
|
19
19
|
npm install -g oh-my-customcode && cd your-project && omcustom init
|
|
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ Each agent declares its tools, model, memory scope, and limitations in YAML fron
|
|
|
146
146
|
|
|
147
147
|
---
|
|
148
148
|
|
|
149
|
-
### Skills (
|
|
149
|
+
### Skills (97)
|
|
150
150
|
|
|
151
151
|
| Category | Count | Includes |
|
|
152
152
|
|----------|-------|----------|
|
|
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ your-project/
|
|
|
282
282
|
├── CLAUDE.md # Entry point
|
|
283
283
|
├── .claude/
|
|
284
284
|
│ ├── agents/ # 46 agent definitions
|
|
285
|
-
│ ├── skills/ #
|
|
285
|
+
│ ├── skills/ # 97 skill modules
|
|
286
286
|
│ ├── rules/ # 21 governance rules (R000-R021)
|
|
287
287
|
│ ├── hooks/ # 15 lifecycle hook scripts
|
|
288
288
|
│ ├── schemas/ # Tool input validation schemas
|
package/dist/cli/index.js
CHANGED
package/dist/index.js
CHANGED
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ escalation: # Model escalation policy (optional)
|
|
|
32
32
|
threshold: 2 # Failures before advisory
|
|
33
33
|
soul: true # Enable SOUL.md identity injection
|
|
34
34
|
isolation: worktree | sandbox # worktree = git worktree, sandbox = restricted bash
|
|
35
|
+
sandboxFailIfUnavailable: true # Exit if sandbox unavailable (v2.1.83+)
|
|
35
36
|
background: true # Run in background
|
|
36
37
|
maxTurns: 10 # Max conversation turns
|
|
37
38
|
maxTokens: 100000 # Per-turn token ceiling
|
|
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ mcpServers: [server-1] # MCP servers available
|
|
|
39
40
|
hooks: # Agent-specific hooks
|
|
40
41
|
PreToolUse:
|
|
41
42
|
- matcher: "Edit"
|
|
43
|
+
if: "Edit(*.md)" # Conditional filter (permission rule syntax, v2.1.85+)
|
|
42
44
|
command: "echo hook"
|
|
43
45
|
permissionMode: bypassPermissions # Permission mode
|
|
44
46
|
disallowedTools: [Bash] # Tools to disallow
|
|
@@ -48,7 +50,7 @@ limitations: # Negative capability declarations
|
|
|
48
50
|
domain: backend # backend | frontend | data-engineering | devops | universal
|
|
49
51
|
```
|
|
50
52
|
|
|
51
|
-
> **Note**: `isolation`, `background`, `maxTurns`, `maxTokens`, `mcpServers`, `hooks`, `permissionMode`, `disallowedTools`, `limitations` are supported in Claude Code v2.1.63+. Hook types `PostCompact`, `Elicitation`, `ElicitationResult` require v2.1.76+.
|
|
53
|
+
> **Note**: `isolation`, `background`, `maxTurns`, `maxTokens`, `mcpServers`, `hooks`, `permissionMode`, `disallowedTools`, `limitations` are supported in Claude Code v2.1.63+. Hook types `PostCompact`, `Elicitation`, `ElicitationResult` require v2.1.76+. `CwdChanged`, `FileChanged` hook events and `managed-settings.d/` drop-in directory require v2.1.83+. Conditional `if` field for hooks requires v2.1.85+.
|
|
52
54
|
|
|
53
55
|
<!-- DETAIL: Isolation/Token/Limitations/Escalation details
|
|
54
56
|
### Isolation Modes
|
|
@@ -25,6 +25,15 @@ Available when `CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1` or TeamCreate/SendMessag
|
|
|
25
25
|
|
|
26
26
|
**When Agent Teams is enabled and criteria are met, usage is required.**
|
|
27
27
|
|
|
28
|
+
### Scope: Intra-Session vs Cross-Session
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
| Scope | Tool | Protocol | Use Case |
|
|
31
|
+
|-------|------|----------|----------|
|
|
32
|
+
| Intra-session | `SendMessage` (Agent Teams) | Peer-to-peer within team | Multi-agent collaboration in one session |
|
|
33
|
+
| Cross-session | `send_message` (claude-peers-mcp) | Broker-mediated | Multi-terminal/project coordination |
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
These are distinct mechanisms. Agent Teams `SendMessage` requires `TeamCreate` and operates within a single Claude Code session. claude-peers-mcp `send_message` operates across separate Claude Code processes via a localhost broker.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
28
37
|
## Self-Check (Before Agent Tool)
|
|
29
38
|
|
|
30
39
|
Before using Agent tool for 2+ agent tasks, complete this check:
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: action-validator
|
|
3
|
+
description: Pre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts
|
|
4
|
+
scope: core
|
|
5
|
+
user-invocable: false
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
# Action Validator Skill
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Purpose
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
Advisory pre-action validation layer that checks agent tool calls against declared capabilities, file access scope (R002), and task contracts before execution. Inspired by AutoHarness (Google DeepMind) — enforcing action-space legality at agent boundaries.
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
This skill does NOT block actions (R021 advisory-first model). It emits warnings when agents attempt operations outside their declared scope.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
## Validation Checks
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
| Check | What | Against |
|
|
19
|
+
|-------|------|---------|
|
|
20
|
+
| Tool scope | Tool being called | Agent's `tools` frontmatter list |
|
|
21
|
+
| File scope | File path in Write/Edit | R002 file access rules |
|
|
22
|
+
| Domain scope | Target file extension | Agent's `domain` frontmatter |
|
|
23
|
+
| Task contract | Operation type | Task description constraints |
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## Advisory Format
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
```
|
|
28
|
+
--- [Action Validator] Scope warning ---
|
|
29
|
+
Agent: {agent-name}
|
|
30
|
+
Tool: {tool-name}
|
|
31
|
+
Target: {file-path}
|
|
32
|
+
Issue: {description}
|
|
33
|
+
Declared scope: {agent's declared tools/domain}
|
|
34
|
+
💡 Suggestion: {recommended action}
|
|
35
|
+
---
|
|
36
|
+
```
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
## Integration Points
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
| System | How |
|
|
41
|
+
|--------|-----|
|
|
42
|
+
| PreToolUse hooks | Optional hook to check tool calls (advisory only) |
|
|
43
|
+
| pipeline-guards | Complements pipeline stage gates |
|
|
44
|
+
| adversarial-review | Provides action-space-legality criterion |
|
|
45
|
+
| R002 (Permissions) | Validates against declared file access rules |
|
|
46
|
+
| R010 (Orchestrator) | Orchestrator validates subagent scope claims |
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
## Policy Cache Pattern
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
For high-repetition agents (e.g., mgr-gitnerd commit workflows), capture validated decision paths as reusable policies:
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
```yaml
|
|
53
|
+
policy_cache:
|
|
54
|
+
agent: mgr-gitnerd
|
|
55
|
+
action: git-commit
|
|
56
|
+
validated_steps:
|
|
57
|
+
- tool: Bash
|
|
58
|
+
pattern: "git add *"
|
|
59
|
+
verdict: allow
|
|
60
|
+
- tool: Bash
|
|
61
|
+
pattern: "git commit *"
|
|
62
|
+
verdict: allow
|
|
63
|
+
- tool: Bash
|
|
64
|
+
pattern: "git push *"
|
|
65
|
+
verdict: warn_confirm
|
|
66
|
+
```
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
Policy caching reduces redundant LLM calls for well-understood workflows. Policies are advisory — the orchestrator may override.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Scope
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
This skill is an advisory layer, not a hard enforcement mechanism:
|
|
73
|
+
- **Does**: Emit warnings, log scope violations, suggest corrections
|
|
74
|
+
- **Does NOT**: Block tool execution, modify agent behavior, override R021
|
|
75
|
+
- **Future**: May integrate with PreToolUse hooks for automated checking (see R021 promotion criteria)
|
|
@@ -70,3 +70,11 @@ Fix: Recommended remediation
|
|
|
70
70
|
- Complements `dev-review` (best practices) with attacker perspective
|
|
71
71
|
- Works with `sec-codeql-expert` for pattern-based + logic-based coverage
|
|
72
72
|
- Can be chained: `dev-review` → `adversarial-review` for complete coverage
|
|
73
|
+
- Works with `action-validator` for action-space legality checking
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
### Action-Space Legality (AutoHarness Pattern)
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
- [ ] Do agents only call tools within their declared `tools` frontmatter?
|
|
78
|
+
- [ ] Do file operations stay within R002-declared access scope?
|
|
79
|
+
- [ ] Are domain boundaries respected (backend agent not editing frontend files)?
|
|
80
|
+
- [ ] Could an agent's task contract be tightened without losing functionality?
|
|
@@ -33,6 +33,27 @@ evaluator-optimizer:
|
|
|
33
33
|
max_iterations: 3 # Default, hard cap: 5
|
|
34
34
|
```
|
|
35
35
|
|
|
36
|
+
### Pre-Negotiation (Sprint Contract Pattern)
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
Optional phase where generator and evaluator agree on rubric interpretation before the first iteration. Inspired by Anthropic's harness design for long-running applications.
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
```yaml
|
|
41
|
+
evaluator-optimizer:
|
|
42
|
+
pre_negotiation:
|
|
43
|
+
enabled: true # Default: false
|
|
44
|
+
rounds: 1 # Negotiation rounds (1-2)
|
|
45
|
+
generator:
|
|
46
|
+
agent: fe-design-expert
|
|
47
|
+
...
|
|
48
|
+
```
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
When enabled:
|
|
51
|
+
1. Generator receives the rubric and proposes its interpretation + planned approach
|
|
52
|
+
2. Evaluator reviews and may adjust rubric weights or add clarifications
|
|
53
|
+
3. Both proceed with aligned expectations, reducing wasted iterations
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
Use when: tasks requiring 3+ iterations consistently, or when generator-evaluator score disagreements exceed 0.3.
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
36
57
|
### Parameter Details
|
|
37
58
|
|
|
38
59
|
| Parameter | Required | Default | Description |
|
|
@@ -307,3 +328,38 @@ When ecomode is active (R013), compress output:
|
|
|
307
328
|
- The evaluator prompt MUST include the full rubric to ensure consistent scoring
|
|
308
329
|
- Iteration state (best score, best output) is tracked by the orchestrator
|
|
309
330
|
- The hard cap of 5 iterations prevents runaway refinement loops
|
|
331
|
+
|
|
332
|
+
## Domain Examples
|
|
333
|
+
|
|
334
|
+
### UI Generation (Anti-AI-Slop)
|
|
335
|
+
|
|
336
|
+
For UI/design generation tasks, use weighted rubrics that penalize generic AI patterns:
|
|
337
|
+
|
|
338
|
+
```yaml
|
|
339
|
+
evaluator-optimizer:
|
|
340
|
+
generator:
|
|
341
|
+
agent: fe-design-expert
|
|
342
|
+
model: sonnet
|
|
343
|
+
evaluator:
|
|
344
|
+
agent: fe-design-expert
|
|
345
|
+
model: opus
|
|
346
|
+
rubric:
|
|
347
|
+
- criterion: originality
|
|
348
|
+
weight: 0.40
|
|
349
|
+
description: "No stock patterns (centered hero + 3-card grid). Unique layout, typography choices, color relationships."
|
|
350
|
+
- criterion: craft
|
|
351
|
+
weight: 0.35
|
|
352
|
+
description: "Intentional spacing, consistent type scale, purposeful color usage. Details that show care."
|
|
353
|
+
- criterion: functionality
|
|
354
|
+
weight: 0.25
|
|
355
|
+
description: "Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA), responsive behavior, interaction states."
|
|
356
|
+
quality_gate:
|
|
357
|
+
type: score_threshold
|
|
358
|
+
threshold: 0.85
|
|
359
|
+
pre_negotiation:
|
|
360
|
+
enabled: true
|
|
361
|
+
```
|
|
362
|
+
|
|
363
|
+
Weight ordering (originality > craft > functionality) follows Anthropic's anti-slop principle: functionality is table stakes, but originality and craft distinguish quality output from generic AI generation.
|
|
364
|
+
|
|
365
|
+
Integration: Works with [impeccable-design](/skills/impeccable-design) skill for design language enforcement.
|
|
@@ -114,3 +114,32 @@ OTEL_LOGS_EXPORTER=otlp
|
|
|
114
114
|
OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_PROTOCOL=grpc
|
|
115
115
|
OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://localhost:4317
|
|
116
116
|
```
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
## HTTP-Level Inspection (Optional)
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
For deeper payload-level debugging beyond aggregated metrics, [Claude Inspector](https://github.com/kangraemin/claude-inspector) provides MITM proxy inspection of Claude Code HTTP traffic.
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
| Aspect | OTel Monitoring (this skill) | Claude Inspector |
|
|
123
|
+
|--------|------------------------------|-----------------|
|
|
124
|
+
| Layer | Application (hooks, stdout) | HTTP (MITM proxy) |
|
|
125
|
+
| Metrics | Aggregated (cost, tokens, duration) | Per-request payload breakdown |
|
|
126
|
+
| Cache visibility | Not available | Prompt Cache hit/miss rates |
|
|
127
|
+
| Sub-agent view | Summary via hooks | Full parent vs sub-agent context comparison |
|
|
128
|
+
| Setup | Built-in (hooks + statusline) | External tool (Homebrew on macOS) |
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
### When to Use
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
- **OTel monitoring**: Daily operations, cost tracking, performance trends
|
|
133
|
+
- **Claude Inspector**: Debugging specific payload issues, measuring CLAUDE.md token impact, verifying ecomode (R013) effectiveness, profiling sub-agent context inheritance
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
### Setup
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
```bash
|
|
138
|
+
# macOS
|
|
139
|
+
brew install kangraemin/tap/claude-inspector
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
# Run proxy
|
|
142
|
+
claude-inspector
|
|
143
|
+
```
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
Claude Inspector is external to oh-my-customcode and does not require any project configuration changes.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: peer-messaging
|
|
3
|
+
description: Cross-session Claude Code instance messaging via claude-peers-mcp broker
|
|
4
|
+
scope: core
|
|
5
|
+
user-invocable: false
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
# Peer Messaging Skill
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Purpose
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
Enables cross-session coordination between multiple Claude Code instances through the claude-peers-mcp broker. Complements Agent Teams (R018, intra-session) with inter-session messaging.
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## Scope Clarification
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
| Scope | Mechanism | Tools | Use Case |
|
|
17
|
+
|-------|-----------|-------|----------|
|
|
18
|
+
| Intra-session agents | Agent Teams (R018) | TeamCreate, SendMessage | Single session multi-agent collaboration |
|
|
19
|
+
| Cross-session instances | claude-peers-mcp | list_peers, send_message | Multi-terminal/project real-time coordination |
|
|
20
|
+
| Cross-session memory | claude-mem | save_memory, search | Async memory persistence |
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
> **Important**: R018's `SendMessage` and claude-peers-mcp's `send_message` are different tools with different scopes. Do not confuse them.
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## MCP Tool Mapping
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
| Tool | Purpose | oh-my-customcode Scenario |
|
|
27
|
+
|------|---------|---------------------------|
|
|
28
|
+
| `list_peers` | Discover active Claude instances | `omcustom:status` system overview |
|
|
29
|
+
| `send_message` | Send message to peer | Cross-project workflow coordination |
|
|
30
|
+
| `set_summary` | Broadcast current task summary | DAG cross-project step sync |
|
|
31
|
+
| `check_messages` | Read incoming messages | Receive coordination signals |
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## Use Cases
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
### Multi-Project Workflow
|
|
36
|
+
Terminal A runs `auto-dev` on project-1; Terminal B works on dependent project-2. Peers coordinate via messages when blocking dependencies are resolved.
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
### Cross-Project QA
|
|
39
|
+
Share test infrastructure state between projects running concurrent test suites.
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### DAG Bridge
|
|
42
|
+
`dag-orchestration` cross-project steps can use peer messaging for synchronization (currently impossible without this tool).
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
## Setup
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
```bash
|
|
47
|
+
# Install broker (optional MCP server)
|
|
48
|
+
npm install -g claude-peers-mcp
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
# Add to MCP config
|
|
51
|
+
claude mcp add claude-peers-mcp -- npx claude-peers-mcp
|
|
52
|
+
```
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
## Integration
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- Works with R018 Agent Teams (different scope, complementary)
|
|
57
|
+
- Works with claude-mem (async vs sync messaging)
|
|
58
|
+
- Works with `omcustom:status` (peer discovery)
|
|
59
|
+
- Broker runs on localhost:7899 (SQLite-backed)
|
|
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Detects when tasks are stuck in repetitive failure loops and advises recovery st
|
|
|
25
25
|
| Model escalation | Agent retry loop | Trigger model-escalation advisory |
|
|
26
26
|
| Alternative approach | Edit loop detected | Suggest different file/method |
|
|
27
27
|
| Human intervention | All automated strategies exhausted | Ask user for guidance |
|
|
28
|
+
| Context reset | Long-running task (>30min) or context >80% | Structured handoff: save state to memory, create fresh session with task summary |
|
|
28
29
|
|
|
29
30
|
## Architecture
|
|
30
31
|
|
|
@@ -53,3 +54,26 @@ PostToolUse (Edit, Write, Bash, Task) → stuck-detector.sh
|
|
|
53
54
|
- Respects R010 (advisory only, orchestrator decides)
|
|
54
55
|
- Uses same PPID-scoped temp file pattern as other hooks
|
|
55
56
|
- Works with task-outcome-recorder.sh data when available
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
## Context Reset Strategy
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
For long-running tasks (>30 minutes) or when context usage exceeds 80%, context reset is preferred over compaction:
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
1. **Save state**: Write current progress, decisions, and open items to native auto-memory
|
|
63
|
+
2. **Create handoff**: Generate structured task summary with:
|
|
64
|
+
- Completed steps and their outcomes
|
|
65
|
+
- Current step and its state
|
|
66
|
+
- Remaining steps
|
|
67
|
+
- Key decisions made and their rationale
|
|
68
|
+
3. **Reset**: Start fresh session with handoff document as input
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
Context reset preserves decision quality by avoiding the information loss inherent in compaction. Based on Anthropic's finding that models experience "context anxiety" — prematurely concluding tasks due to perceived token limits.
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
### When to Use
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
| Condition | Strategy |
|
|
75
|
+
|-----------|----------|
|
|
76
|
+
| Context < 60% | Continue normally |
|
|
77
|
+
| Context 60-80% | Consider `/compact` |
|
|
78
|
+
| Context > 80% OR duration > 30min | Context reset recommended |
|
|
79
|
+
| Repeated compaction in same session | Context reset required |
|
|
@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: workflow
|
|
3
|
-
description: Invoke YAML-defined workflows by name — /workflow
|
|
2
|
+
name: omcustom:workflow
|
|
3
|
+
description: Invoke YAML-defined workflows by name — /omcustom:workflow auto-dev runs the full pipeline
|
|
4
4
|
scope: harness
|
|
5
5
|
user-invocable: true
|
|
6
6
|
effort: high
|
|
7
7
|
argument-hint: "<workflow-name> | (no args to list available)"
|
|
8
8
|
---
|
|
9
9
|
|
|
10
|
-
# /workflow — Workflow Invocation
|
|
10
|
+
# /omcustom:workflow — Workflow Invocation
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
12
|
## Usage
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
14
|
```
|
|
15
|
-
/workflow
|
|
16
|
-
/workflow # List available workflows
|
|
17
|
-
/workflow:resume # Resume a halted workflow
|
|
15
|
+
/omcustom:workflow auto-dev # Run the auto-dev workflow
|
|
16
|
+
/omcustom:workflow # List available workflows
|
|
17
|
+
/omcustom:workflow:resume # Resume a halted workflow
|
|
18
18
|
```
|
|
19
19
|
|
|
20
20
|
## Behavior
|
|
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ argument-hint: "<workflow-name> | (no args to list available)"
|
|
|
24
24
|
Scan `workflows/*.yaml` and display:
|
|
25
25
|
```
|
|
26
26
|
Available workflows:
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
27
|
+
auto-dev — verify-done issues release batch: triage → plan → implement → verify → PR
|
|
28
28
|
```
|
|
29
29
|
|
|
30
30
|
### Run Mode (with workflow name)
|
|
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Available workflows:
|
|
|
35
35
|
4. Invoke workflow-runner skill with the loaded definition
|
|
36
36
|
5. Report completion or failure
|
|
37
37
|
|
|
38
|
-
### Resume Mode (/workflow:resume)
|
|
38
|
+
### Resume Mode (/omcustom:workflow:resume)
|
|
39
39
|
|
|
40
40
|
1. Check for state file: `/tmp/.claude-workflow-*-{PPID}.json`
|
|
41
41
|
2. If found: show halted workflow name and failed step
|
package/templates/CLAUDE.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ project/
|
|
|
138
138
|
+-- CLAUDE.md # 진입점
|
|
139
139
|
+-- .claude/
|
|
140
140
|
| +-- agents/ # 서브에이전트 정의 (46 파일)
|
|
141
|
-
| +-- skills/ # 스킬 (
|
|
141
|
+
| +-- skills/ # 스킬 (97 디렉토리)
|
|
142
142
|
| +-- rules/ # 전역 규칙 (R000-R021)
|
|
143
143
|
| +-- hooks/ # 훅 스크립트 (보안, 검증, HUD)
|
|
144
144
|
| +-- contexts/ # 컨텍스트 파일 (ecomode)
|
package/templates/manifest.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
|
-
"version": "0.
|
|
2
|
+
"version": "0.60.1",
|
|
3
3
|
"lastUpdated": "2026-03-24T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
4
4
|
"components": [
|
|
5
5
|
{
|
|
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
|
|
|
18
18
|
"name": "skills",
|
|
19
19
|
"path": ".claude/skills",
|
|
20
20
|
"description": "Reusable skill modules (includes slash commands)",
|
|
21
|
-
"files":
|
|
21
|
+
"files": 97
|
|
22
22
|
},
|
|
23
23
|
{
|
|
24
24
|
"name": "guides",
|
|
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# /workflow
|
|
2
|
-
# Collects verify-done issues → triage → plan → implement → verify → PR
|
|
1
|
+
# /omcustom:workflow auto-dev — Full-auto release pipeline
|
|
2
|
+
# Collects verify-done issues → triage → plan → implement → verify → PR → followup
|
|
3
3
|
|
|
4
|
-
name:
|
|
5
|
-
description: "verify-done issues release batch: triage → plan → implement → verify → PR"
|
|
4
|
+
name: auto-dev
|
|
5
|
+
description: "verify-done issues release batch: triage → plan → implement → verify → PR → followup"
|
|
6
6
|
mode: auto
|
|
7
7
|
error: halt-and-report
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
@@ -33,3 +33,7 @@ steps:
|
|
|
33
33
|
- name: release
|
|
34
34
|
action: create-pr
|
|
35
35
|
description: Create release branch and pull request
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
- name: followup
|
|
38
|
+
skill: post-release-followup
|
|
39
|
+
description: Recommend follow-up actions — user chooses to execute now or register as issues
|