oh-my-customcode 0.57.0 → 0.58.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
13
13
 
14
14
  **[한국어 문서 (Korean)](./README_ko.md)**
15
15
 
16
- 45 agents. 93 skills. 21 rules. One command.
16
+ 46 agents. 95 skills. 21 rules. One command.
17
17
 
18
18
  ```bash
19
19
  npm install -g oh-my-customcode && cd your-project && omcustom init
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ Agent(arch-documenter):haiku ┘
125
125
 
126
126
  ---
127
127
 
128
- ### Agents (45)
128
+ ### Agents (46)
129
129
 
130
130
  | Category | Count | Agents |
131
131
  |----------|-------|--------|
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ Each agent declares its tools, model, memory scope, and limitations in YAML fron
146
146
 
147
147
  ---
148
148
 
149
- ### Skills (93)
149
+ ### Skills (95)
150
150
 
151
151
  | Category | Count | Includes |
152
152
  |----------|-------|----------|
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ Key rules: R010 (orchestrator never writes files), R009 (parallel execution mand
236
236
 
237
237
  ---
238
238
 
239
- ### Guides (30)
239
+ ### Guides (31)
240
240
 
241
241
  Reference documentation covering best practices, architecture decisions, and integration patterns. Located in `guides/` at project root, covering topics from agent design to CI/CD to observability.
242
242
 
@@ -281,15 +281,15 @@ omcustom serve-stop # Stop Web UI
281
281
  your-project/
282
282
  ├── CLAUDE.md # Entry point
283
283
  ├── .claude/
284
- │ ├── agents/ # 45 agent definitions
285
- │ ├── skills/ # 91 skill modules
284
+ │ ├── agents/ # 46 agent definitions
285
+ │ ├── skills/ # 95 skill modules
286
286
  │ ├── rules/ # 21 governance rules (R000-R021)
287
287
  │ ├── hooks/ # 15 lifecycle hook scripts
288
288
  │ ├── schemas/ # Tool input validation schemas
289
289
  │ ├── specs/ # Extracted canonical specs
290
290
  │ ├── contexts/ # 4 shared context files
291
291
  │ └── ontology/ # Knowledge graph for RAG
292
- └── guides/ # 30 reference documents
292
+ └── guides/ # 31 reference documents
293
293
  ```
294
294
 
295
295
  ---
package/dist/cli/index.js CHANGED
@@ -9325,7 +9325,7 @@ var init_package = __esm(() => {
9325
9325
  workspaces: [
9326
9326
  "packages/*"
9327
9327
  ],
9328
- version: "0.57.0",
9328
+ version: "0.58.1",
9329
9329
  description: "Batteries-included agent harness for Claude Code",
9330
9330
  type: "module",
9331
9331
  bin: {
package/dist/index.js CHANGED
@@ -1672,7 +1672,7 @@ var package_default = {
1672
1672
  workspaces: [
1673
1673
  "packages/*"
1674
1674
  ],
1675
- version: "0.57.0",
1675
+ version: "0.58.1",
1676
1676
  description: "Batteries-included agent harness for Claude Code",
1677
1677
  type: "module",
1678
1678
  bin: {
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
3
3
  "workspaces": [
4
4
  "packages/*"
5
5
  ],
6
- "version": "0.57.0",
6
+ "version": "0.58.1",
7
7
  "description": "Batteries-included agent harness for Claude Code",
8
8
  "type": "module",
9
9
  "bin": {
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: fe-design-expert
3
+ description: Use for design system review, typography audit, color palette evaluation, motion design, and AI-generated design quality assessment
4
+ model: sonnet
5
+ domain: frontend
6
+ memory: project
7
+ effort: medium
8
+ skills:
9
+ - impeccable-design
10
+ - web-design-guidelines
11
+ tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash]
12
+ source:
13
+ type: external
14
+ origin: github
15
+ url: https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable
16
+ version: 1.0.0
17
+ ---
18
+
19
+ You are a frontend design specialist focused on visual quality, aesthetic craft, and eliminating "AI slop" from production UI. Your domain is the *feel* of an interface — the choices that make design feel intentional rather than generated.
20
+
21
+ ## Role
22
+
23
+ You evaluate and improve the aesthetic dimensions of user interfaces: typography, color, motion, spatial layout, and UX writing. You use the Impeccable AI design language to guide critique and implementation, steering toward production-grade visual quality.
24
+
25
+ **Critical distinction**: You handle AESTHETIC and VISUAL quality. For technical compliance (accessibility, performance, semantic HTML), use `web-design-guidelines` skill or the `fe-vercel-agent`.
26
+
27
+ ## Source
28
+
29
+ External from https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable (v1.0.0)
30
+
31
+ ## Capabilities
32
+
33
+ ### 10 Impeccable Steering Commands
34
+
35
+ | Command | Trigger phrases | What it does |
36
+ |---------|----------------|--------------|
37
+ | **critique** | "review design", "UX feedback", "design critique" | Holistic UX review: hierarchy, clarity, emotional resonance, and intentionality |
38
+ | **audit** | "design audit", "quality check", "design review" | Systematic check across all design dimensions — typography, color, motion, layout, copy |
39
+ | **typeset** | "fix fonts", "typography", "improve text hierarchy" | Fix font choices, scale, weight contrast, line-height, and type pairing |
40
+ | **colorize** | "add color", "color palette", "fix colors" | Introduce strategic color using OKLCH; build tinted neutrals, avoid pure black/white |
41
+ | **animate** | "add motion", "animation", "transitions" | Add purposeful motion using 100ms/300ms/500ms rule; avoid decorative bounce/elastic |
42
+ | **normalize** | "align design system", "tokens", "consistency" | Align with design system standards; enforce spacing scale and token usage |
43
+ | **polish** | "final pass", "ship ready", "pre-launch review" | Pre-ship quality sweep across all dimensions; AI slop test included |
44
+ | **clarify** | "improve copy", "UX writing", "button labels" | Improve unclear labels, microcopy, empty states, and error messages |
45
+ | **arrange** | "fix layout", "spacing", "visual rhythm" | Fix layout structure, whitespace, alignment, and visual rhythm |
46
+ | **adapt** | "responsive", "mobile", "breakpoints" | Adapt design for different screen sizes and input modes |
47
+
48
+ ### AI Slop Test
49
+
50
+ Before declaring any design "done", run the AI Slop Test. This is the critical checkpoint.
51
+
52
+ Ask: **Would someone immediately identify this as AI-generated?**
53
+
54
+ Flag these patterns as AI slop:
55
+ - Overused fonts: Inter, Roboto, or Arial used as default without intentional reason
56
+ - Pure black (`#000`) or pure gray backgrounds with no color tinting
57
+ - Excessive card nesting with uniform rounded corners and drop shadows on everything
58
+ - Generic gradient backgrounds (blue-purple, coral-orange) with no contextual rationale
59
+ - Bounce or elastic animations as "delight" without functional purpose
60
+ - Centered-everything layouts that avoid spatial decisions
61
+ - Hero sections with a gradient blob behind centered text
62
+ - Identical spacing increments used everywhere (8px, 8px, 8px)
63
+ - Color palettes that are purely neutral except for one brand accent
64
+ - Empty states with a generic icon + "No items yet" + CTA
65
+
66
+ ## Workflow
67
+
68
+ ```
69
+ 1. Context gathering
70
+ - Read component/page files to understand current implementation
71
+ - Identify design intent and target audience
72
+ - Note existing design system tokens if present
73
+
74
+ 2. Design direction
75
+ - Select appropriate Impeccable commands for the task
76
+ - Establish aesthetic goals before implementation
77
+ - Check for AI slop patterns in current state
78
+
79
+ 3. Implementation
80
+ - Apply targeted changes with clear rationale
81
+ - Prefer incremental polish over full rewrites
82
+ - Document design decisions in comments when non-obvious
83
+
84
+ 4. Slop test
85
+ - Rerun AI Slop Test on output
86
+ - Verify changes feel intentional, not generated
87
+ - Check that typography, color, and motion work together
88
+ ```
89
+
90
+ ## Role Separation
91
+
92
+ | Aspect | fe-design-expert (this agent) | fe-vercel-agent / web-design-guidelines |
93
+ |--------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
94
+ | Typography | Font selection, pairing, type scale, expressive hierarchy | Minimum font sizes, contrast ratios |
95
+ | Color | Palette building, OKLCH, tinted neutrals, emotional resonance | WCAG contrast compliance |
96
+ | Motion | Purposeful animation, easing curves, timing strategy | prefers-reduced-motion compliance |
97
+ | Layout | Visual rhythm, spatial design, negative space | Accessibility, semantic HTML structure |
98
+ | Copy | UX writing tone, clarity, label specificity | (no overlap) |
99
+
100
+ ## When to Use
101
+
102
+ - Design reviews where visual quality is the focus
103
+ - Typography or color audits before a release
104
+ - Adding motion/animation to a UI
105
+ - Improving UX copy and microcopy
106
+ - Pre-ship polish sweeps
107
+ - Identifying AI-generated aesthetics that need humanization
108
+
109
+ ## When NOT to Use
110
+
111
+ - Performance optimization → use `tool-optimizer`
112
+ - Accessibility compliance testing → use `web-design-guidelines` skill
113
+ - Backend or API code → use appropriate language/framework agent
114
+ - Bundle size analysis → use `tool-npm-expert`
115
+
116
+ ## Reference Guides
117
+
118
+ - `guides/impeccable-design/typography.md` — type scale, font pairing, hierarchy
119
+ - `guides/impeccable-design/color-and-contrast.md` — OKLCH, palette strategy, tinted neutrals
120
+ - `guides/impeccable-design/motion-design.md` — timing rules, easing, purposeful animation
121
+ - `guides/impeccable-design/ux-writing.md` — microcopy, labels, empty states, error messages
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ model: sonnet
5
5
  domain: frontend
6
6
  memory: project
7
7
  effort: medium
8
+ skills:
9
+ - impeccable-design
8
10
  tools:
9
11
  - Read
10
12
  - Write
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ skills:
9
9
  - react-best-practices
10
10
  - web-design-guidelines
11
11
  - vercel-deploy
12
+ - impeccable-design
12
13
  tools:
13
14
  - Read
14
15
  - Write
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ model: sonnet
5
5
  domain: frontend
6
6
  memory: project
7
7
  effort: medium
8
+ skills:
9
+ - impeccable-design
8
10
  tools:
9
11
  - Read
10
12
  - Write
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: impeccable-design
3
+ description: AI design language for production-grade UI — 10 commands covering typography, color, motion, layout, and UX writing quality
4
+ scope: core
5
+ user-invocable: false
6
+ version: 1.0.0
7
+ source:
8
+ type: external
9
+ origin: github
10
+ url: https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable
11
+ ---
12
+
13
+ ## Purpose
14
+
15
+ Impeccable is a design language for producing intentional, production-grade UI. It defines a vocabulary of steering commands that guide an AI toward specific design dimensions — typography, color, motion, layout, and UX writing — while actively avoiding the generic patterns associated with AI-generated interfaces.
16
+
17
+ ## Commands
18
+
19
+ ### 10 Selected Commands
20
+
21
+ | Command | Trigger phrases | Description |
22
+ |---------|----------------|-------------|
23
+ | **critique** | "review design", "UX feedback" | UX design review: hierarchy, clarity, emotional resonance, and intentionality across the interface |
24
+ | **audit** | "design audit", "quality check" | Systematic quality checks across all design dimensions simultaneously |
25
+ | **typeset** | "fix fonts", "typography" | Fix font choices, weight contrast, scale, line-height, tracking, and type pairing |
26
+ | **colorize** | "add color", "color palette" | Introduce strategic color using OKLCH; construct tinted neutral palettes, avoid pure black/white |
27
+ | **animate** | "add motion", "animation" | Add purposeful motion using the 100ms/300ms/500ms rule; eliminate decorative or distracting animation |
28
+ | **normalize** | "align design system" | Align output with design system standards: spacing scales, token usage, component consistency |
29
+ | **polish** | "final pass", "ship ready" | Pre-ship quality sweep across all design dimensions, including AI slop test |
30
+ | **clarify** | "improve copy", "UX writing" | Improve UX copy: labels, microcopy, empty states, error messages, button specificity |
31
+ | **arrange** | "fix layout", "spacing" | Fix layout structure, whitespace, alignment, and visual rhythm |
32
+ | **adapt** | "responsive", "mobile" | Adapt design decisions for different devices, screen sizes, and input modes |
33
+
34
+ ### Command Detail
35
+
36
+ #### critique
37
+ Holistic UX review. Evaluates information hierarchy, interaction clarity, emotional resonance, and whether design decisions feel intentional. Surfaces both friction points and missed opportunities. Output: prioritized list of issues with impact level (critical / moderate / minor).
38
+
39
+ #### audit
40
+ Systematic multi-dimension check. Runs all other command lenses in sequence and produces a structured report. Use when you need a full picture before starting work. Output: dimension-by-dimension audit with specific findings.
41
+
42
+ #### typeset
43
+ Typography repair. Evaluates and fixes:
44
+ - Font family selection (avoid default Inter/Roboto/Arial without rationale)
45
+ - Type scale (use modular scale, not arbitrary pixel sizes)
46
+ - Weight contrast (body vs. heading vs. label differentiation)
47
+ - Line-height and measure (optimal reading width 60-75 chars)
48
+ - Letter-spacing for display vs. body contexts
49
+ - Font pairing coherence
50
+
51
+ #### colorize
52
+ Color strategy and implementation using OKLCH. Key principles:
53
+ - Build tinted neutrals (never pure gray — always a 5-10% hue push)
54
+ - Use OKLCH for perceptually uniform lightness steps
55
+ - Establish semantic color roles (primary, surface, on-surface, accent, destructive)
56
+ - Avoid pure black backgrounds; tint with brand hue at low chroma
57
+ - Check color relationships for harmony, not just individual values
58
+
59
+ #### animate
60
+ Motion design with purpose. Core rule — 100/300/500ms:
61
+ - 100ms: micro-interactions, state transitions (hover, focus, active)
62
+ - 300ms: element entrances, panel transitions, drawer opens
63
+ - 500ms: page transitions, complex sequence animations
64
+ Avoid: bounce/elastic easing as decoration, animation on load without user trigger, looping animations in primary content areas.
65
+ Use: ease-out for entrances, ease-in for exits, linear for progress/loading.
66
+
67
+ #### normalize
68
+ Design system alignment. Enforces:
69
+ - Spacing scale usage (4/8/12/16/24/32/48/64 or 4pt grid)
70
+ - Border radius consistency (choose a base radius, derive multiples)
71
+ - Shadow scale (0-3 elevation levels, not arbitrary per-component)
72
+ - Color token usage vs. hardcoded values
73
+ - Component variant consistency
74
+
75
+ #### polish
76
+ Pre-ship quality sweep. Runs: typeset + colorize + arrange + AI slop test + final coherence check. Output includes a ship-readiness verdict (ship / ship with minor fixes / needs work).
77
+
78
+ #### clarify
79
+ UX writing improvement. Targets:
80
+ - Button labels: specific verbs over generic ("Save changes" not "Submit")
81
+ - Empty states: explain what goes here + clear action to fill it
82
+ - Error messages: say what happened + what to do (not "An error occurred")
83
+ - Tooltips and help text: answer the user's actual question
84
+ - Confirmation dialogs: describe the consequence, not the action
85
+
86
+ #### arrange
87
+ Layout and spatial design. Fixes:
88
+ - Visual hierarchy via size, weight, and position
89
+ - Negative space: increase breathing room between unrelated groups
90
+ - Alignment: establish a clear grid baseline
91
+ - Proximity: group related elements, separate unrelated ones
92
+ - Visual rhythm: consistent incremental spacing within components
93
+
94
+ #### adapt
95
+ Responsive and cross-device adaptation:
96
+ - Mobile-first breakpoint strategy
97
+ - Touch target sizing (minimum 44x44px)
98
+ - Content reflow for narrow viewports
99
+ - Progressive disclosure for complex interfaces on mobile
100
+ - Pointer vs. touch interaction mode awareness
101
+
102
+ ## AI Slop Test
103
+
104
+ The AI Slop Test is a critical checkpoint embedded in every `audit` and `polish` command. It must also be run manually on any design output before declaring it complete.
105
+
106
+ **The question**: Would someone immediately identify this as AI-generated?
107
+
108
+ ### Patterns to Flag as AI Slop
109
+
110
+ **Typography slop**
111
+ - Inter, Roboto, or Arial as the default font with no intentional reason stated
112
+ - All text the same weight except headings
113
+ - Line-height exactly 1.5 applied universally regardless of font size
114
+
115
+ **Color slop**
116
+ - Pure black (`#000000` or `#0d0d0d`) or pure gray (`#f5f5f5`, `#e5e5e5`) backgrounds without tinting
117
+ - One brand color on an otherwise completely neutral palette
118
+ - Blue-purple or coral-orange gradients with no contextual rationale
119
+
120
+ **Layout slop**
121
+ - Centered-everything layout that avoids making spatial decisions
122
+ - Identical card components with same border-radius, same shadow, and same padding stacked vertically
123
+ - Hero section: gradient blob behind centered heading + subheading + two buttons
124
+
125
+ **Motion slop**
126
+ - Bounce or elastic easing used as "delight" with no functional purpose
127
+ - Every element animates on page load with staggered delays
128
+ - Hover states that scale to 1.05 on every interactive element
129
+
130
+ **Copy slop**
131
+ - Empty states: "[Icon] No [items] yet. [Create button]"
132
+ - Error messages: "Something went wrong. Please try again."
133
+ - Buttons: "Submit", "Confirm", "OK"
134
+ - Tooltips: restate the label they're attached to
135
+
136
+ ### Slop Test Verdict
137
+
138
+ After running the test, assign one of:
139
+ - **Clean**: No slop patterns detected
140
+ - **Mild slop**: 1-2 patterns present, easy to fix
141
+ - **Heavy slop**: 3+ patterns, requires deliberate design work before ship
142
+
143
+ ## Role Separation
144
+
145
+ This skill operates in the aesthetic/creative layer. It does not replace technical compliance tooling.
146
+
147
+ | Design Aspect | impeccable-design (this skill) | web-design-guidelines |
148
+ |---------------|-------------------------------|----------------------|
149
+ | Typography | Font selection, pairing, type scale, expressive hierarchy | Minimum font sizes (16px body), contrast ratios |
150
+ | Color | Palette building, OKLCH, tinted neutrals, emotional resonance | WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA contrast compliance |
151
+ | Motion | Purposeful animation, easing curves, timing strategy, felt quality | prefers-reduced-motion compliance, no-animation-on-load |
152
+ | Layout | Visual rhythm, spatial design, negative space, hierarchy | Accessibility, semantic HTML structure, ARIA landmarks |
153
+ | Copy | Tone, clarity, specificity, label quality | (no overlap) |
154
+
155
+ **When both apply**: Run `impeccable-design` for aesthetic quality, then `web-design-guidelines` for compliance. They are complementary, not competing.
156
+
157
+ ## Reference Guides
158
+
159
+ - `guides/impeccable-design/typography.md` — type scale construction, font pairing strategy, hierarchy patterns
160
+ - `guides/impeccable-design/color-and-contrast.md` — OKLCH primer, tinted neutral construction, palette strategy
161
+ - `guides/impeccable-design/motion-design.md` — 100/300/500ms rule, easing reference, purposeful vs. decorative motion
162
+ - `guides/impeccable-design/ux-writing.md` — microcopy patterns, empty state templates, error message formulas
163
+
164
+ ## Execution Flow
165
+
166
+ ```
167
+ 1. Identify active command(s) from trigger phrase or explicit instruction
168
+ 2. Read target component/page files
169
+ 3. Consult relevant reference guides for the active command
170
+ 4. Apply changes with explicit rationale for each decision
171
+ 5. Run AI Slop Test on output
172
+ 6. Report: changes made + slop test verdict + any deferred items
173
+ ```
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: post-release-followup
3
+ description: Analyze release workflow findings and recommend follow-up actions — execute immediately or register as issues
4
+ scope: harness
5
+ user-invocable: false
6
+ effort: medium
7
+ ---
8
+
9
+ # Post-Release Follow-up
10
+
11
+ ## Purpose
12
+
13
+ After PR creation in the omcustom-dev release workflow, collect unaddressed findings and present actionable follow-up recommendations. The user chooses: execute now, register as issues, or skip.
14
+
15
+ ## Workflow
16
+
17
+ ### 1. Collect Follow-up Candidates
18
+
19
+ Gather unfinished work from multiple sources:
20
+
21
+ **Source A — Remaining open issues**:
22
+ - Run: `gh issue list --label verify-done --state open --json number,title,labels`
23
+ - These are triaged issues NOT included in the current release
24
+
25
+ **Source B — Deep-verify findings**:
26
+ - Read the latest deep-verify output from `.claude/outputs/sessions/{today}/`
27
+ - Extract any MEDIUM or LOW severity findings that were flagged but not fixed
28
+
29
+ **Source C — Triage deferred items**:
30
+ - Read the latest professor-triage output from `.claude/outputs/sessions/{today}/`
31
+ - Extract items explicitly marked as deferred or P3
32
+
33
+ **Source D — TODO markers in changed files**:
34
+ - Run: `git diff develop...HEAD --name-only` to get changed files
35
+ - Search changed files for `TODO`, `FIXME`, `HACK` markers added in this release
36
+
37
+ **Source E — PR review feedback**:
38
+ - Run: `gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments` and `gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments`
39
+ - Parse omc_pr_analyzer bot comments (Senior Architect, Project Colleague, Professor Synthesis)
40
+ - Extract findings categorized as Critical, High, Medium
41
+ - Identify: required fixes, recommended improvements, structural concerns
42
+
43
+ ### 2. Deduplicate and Categorize
44
+
45
+ Remove duplicates (same issue referenced from multiple sources). Categorize:
46
+
47
+ | Category | Criteria | Default Action |
48
+ |----------|----------|----------------|
49
+ | **Immediate** | P1/P2 remaining issues, MEDIUM+ verify findings, Critical/High PR review findings | Execute now |
50
+ | **Trackable** | P3 issues, LOW verify findings, new TODOs, Medium PR review findings | Register as issue |
51
+ | **Informational** | Already-tracked issues, cosmetic notes | Skip |
52
+
53
+ ### 3. Present to User
54
+
55
+ Display follow-up summary:
56
+
57
+ ```
58
+ [Follow-up] {n}개 후속 작업 발견
59
+
60
+ ━━━ 즉시 실행 추천 ({count}개) ━━━
61
+ 1. {description} — 출처: {source}
62
+ 2. {description} — 출처: {source}
63
+
64
+ ━━━ 이슈 등록 추천 ({count}개) ━━━
65
+ 3. {description} — 출처: {source}
66
+ 4. {description} — 출처: {source}
67
+
68
+ ━━━ 참고 사항 ({count}개) ━━━
69
+ 5. {description} — 이미 #{issue_number}로 추적 중
70
+
71
+ 선택:
72
+ [A] 추천대로 실행 (즉시 실행 + 이슈 등록)
73
+ [B] 모두 즉시 실행
74
+ [C] 모두 이슈 등록
75
+ [D] 개별 선택 (항목별로 질문)
76
+ [E] 건너뛰기
77
+ ```
78
+
79
+ Use AskUserQuestion (or equivalent user prompt) to get the choice.
80
+
81
+ ### 4. Process User Choice
82
+
83
+ **Option A (추천대로)**:
84
+ - "Immediate" items → delegate to appropriate specialist agents for execution
85
+ - "Trackable" items → create GitHub issues via `gh issue create`
86
+ - "Informational" items → skip
87
+
88
+ **Option B (모두 즉시 실행)**:
89
+ - All Immediate + Trackable items → delegate to specialist agents
90
+ - Follow implementation patterns from the release workflow
91
+
92
+ **Option C (모두 이슈 등록)**:
93
+ - All Immediate + Trackable items → `gh issue create` with appropriate labels
94
+ - Label: `professor` for auto-triage in next workflow run
95
+
96
+ **Option D (개별 선택)**:
97
+ - For each item, ask: `[{n}] {description} — 실행(E) / 이슈(I) / 건너뛰기(S)?`
98
+ - Process each per user choice
99
+
100
+ **Option E (건너뛰기)**:
101
+ - Skip all follow-up actions
102
+ - Complete workflow
103
+
104
+ ### 5. Report
105
+
106
+ ```
107
+ [Follow-up Complete]
108
+ ├── 즉시 실행: {n}개 완료
109
+ ├── 이슈 등록: {n}개 (#{numbers})
110
+ ├── 건너뛰기: {n}개
111
+ └── 총 처리: {total}개
112
+ ```
113
+
114
+ ## Issue Creation Template
115
+
116
+ When creating follow-up issues:
117
+
118
+ ```bash
119
+ gh issue create \
120
+ --title "{concise description}" \
121
+ --body "## Source\n\nDiscovered during v{version} release workflow.\n\n## Context\n\n{detailed context from triage/verify}\n\n## Suggested Action\n\n{recommendation}" \
122
+ --label "professor"
123
+ ```
124
+
125
+ Add priority label (`P1`, `P2`, `P3`) based on categorization.
126
+
127
+ ## Notes
128
+
129
+ - This skill runs in the main conversation context (via workflow skill step)
130
+ - User interaction is expected — this is NOT a fully automated step
131
+ - All file modifications delegated to specialist subagents per R010
132
+ - Issue creation uses `gh` CLI directly (read-only operation pattern)
133
+ - If no follow-up candidates found, report "No follow-up actions needed" and complete
134
+ - PR review feedback is available shortly after PR creation — the omc_pr_analyzer bot comments automatically
@@ -137,12 +137,12 @@ oh-my-customcode로 구동됩니다.
137
137
  project/
138
138
  +-- CLAUDE.md # 진입점
139
139
  +-- .claude/
140
- | +-- agents/ # 서브에이전트 정의 (45 파일)
141
- | +-- skills/ # 스킬 (93 디렉토리)
140
+ | +-- agents/ # 서브에이전트 정의 (46 파일)
141
+ | +-- skills/ # 스킬 (94 디렉토리)
142
142
  | +-- rules/ # 전역 규칙 (R000-R021)
143
143
  | +-- hooks/ # 훅 스크립트 (보안, 검증, HUD)
144
144
  | +-- contexts/ # 컨텍스트 파일 (ecomode)
145
- +-- guides/ # 레퍼런스 문서 (30 토픽)
145
+ +-- guides/ # 레퍼런스 문서 (31 토픽)
146
146
  ```
147
147
 
148
148
  ## 오케스트레이션