oh-my-customcode 0.106.0 → 0.106.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +4 -4
- package/dist/cli/index.js +1 -1
- package/dist/index.js +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/templates/.claude/agents/tracker-checkpoint.md +72 -0
- package/templates/.claude/skills/dag-orchestration/SKILL.md +46 -3
- package/templates/.claude/skills/pipeline-guards/SKILL.md +39 -0
- package/templates/.claude/skills/sdd-dev/SKILL.md +17 -3
- package/templates/.claude/skills/sdd-dev/templates/decision-record.md +45 -0
- package/templates/CLAUDE.md +3 -3
- package/templates/guides/harness-engineering/README.md +3 -3
- package/templates/manifest.json +2 -2
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
|
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
14
|
**[한국어 문서 (Korean)](./README_ko.md)**
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
16
|
+
49 agents. 113 skills. 22 rules. One command.
|
|
17
17
|
|
|
18
18
|
```bash
|
|
19
19
|
npm install -g oh-my-customcode && cd your-project && omcustom init
|
|
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Agent(arch-documenter):haiku ┘
|
|
|
111
111
|
|
|
112
112
|
---
|
|
113
113
|
|
|
114
|
-
### Agents (
|
|
114
|
+
### Agents (49)
|
|
115
115
|
|
|
116
116
|
| Category | Count | Agents |
|
|
117
117
|
|----------|-------|--------|
|
|
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Agent(arch-documenter):haiku ┘
|
|
|
126
126
|
| QA | 3 | qa-planner, qa-writer, qa-engineer |
|
|
127
127
|
| Security | 1 | sec-codeql |
|
|
128
128
|
| Managers | 6 | mgr-creator, mgr-updater, mgr-supplier, mgr-gitnerd, mgr-sauron, mgr-claude-code-bible |
|
|
129
|
-
| System |
|
|
129
|
+
| System | 3 | sys-memory-keeper, sys-naggy, tracker-checkpoint |
|
|
130
130
|
|
|
131
131
|
Each agent declares its tools, model, memory scope, and limitations in YAML frontmatter. Tool budgets are enforced per agent type for accuracy.
|
|
132
132
|
|
|
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ omcustom serve-stop # Stop Web UI
|
|
|
271
271
|
your-project/
|
|
272
272
|
├── CLAUDE.md # Entry point
|
|
273
273
|
├── .claude/
|
|
274
|
-
│ ├── agents/ #
|
|
274
|
+
│ ├── agents/ # 49 agent definitions
|
|
275
275
|
│ ├── skills/ # 113 skill modules
|
|
276
276
|
│ ├── rules/ # 22 governance rules (R000-R021)
|
|
277
277
|
│ ├── hooks/ # 15 lifecycle hook scripts
|
package/dist/cli/index.js
CHANGED
package/dist/index.js
CHANGED
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: tracker-checkpoint
|
|
3
|
+
description: Pipeline execution state tracker with checkpoint persistence. Reads/writes /tmp/.claude-pipeline-*-{PPID}.json state files and validates state transitions. Used by dag-orchestration for resume-after-failure and pipeline-guards for quality gate state.
|
|
4
|
+
model: sonnet
|
|
5
|
+
effort: medium
|
|
6
|
+
tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep]
|
|
7
|
+
memory: project
|
|
8
|
+
skills: [dag-orchestration, pipeline-guards]
|
|
9
|
+
domain: universal
|
|
10
|
+
permissionMode: bypassPermissions
|
|
11
|
+
---
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
# Tracker Checkpoint Agent
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Purpose
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
Pipeline 실행 상태를 persistent checkpoint 파일로 관리. `/pipeline resume`, `dag-orchestration`, `pipeline-guards`와 협력하여 실패 후 재개를 가능하게 합니다.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Capabilities
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
- Read/write `/tmp/.claude-pipeline-{name}-{PPID}.json` state files
|
|
22
|
+
- Validate state transitions (pending → running → completed | failed)
|
|
23
|
+
- Coordinate with dag-orchestration for step-level checkpointing
|
|
24
|
+
- Coordinate with pipeline-guards for gate-level state snapshots
|
|
25
|
+
- Support `/pipeline resume` by loading last known state
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Workflow
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### 1. Pipeline Start (Bootstrap)
|
|
30
|
+
- Create `/tmp/.claude-pipeline-{name}-{PPID}.json` with initial state
|
|
31
|
+
- Record: pipeline name, started timestamp, total steps, current_step=0
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
### 2. Per-Step Checkpoint
|
|
34
|
+
- After each step: update state file atomically
|
|
35
|
+
- Record: step name, status, duration_ms, output artifacts paths
|
|
36
|
+
- Status transitions: pending → running → completed | failed
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
### 3. Failure Freeze
|
|
39
|
+
- On step failure: mark status=halted, preserve state for resume
|
|
40
|
+
- Capture: error message, stack trace (if any), partial artifacts
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
### 4. Resume Coordination
|
|
43
|
+
- On `/pipeline resume`: scan `/tmp/.claude-pipeline-*-{PPID}.json`
|
|
44
|
+
- Return state to orchestrator: name, failed step, error, options (retry/skip/abort)
|
|
45
|
+
- On retry: reset failed step to pending, resume execution
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
## State File Schema
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
```json
|
|
50
|
+
{
|
|
51
|
+
"pipeline": "{name}",
|
|
52
|
+
"started": "ISO-8601",
|
|
53
|
+
"status": "running|completed|halted",
|
|
54
|
+
"current_step": 0,
|
|
55
|
+
"steps": [
|
|
56
|
+
{"name": "triage", "status": "completed", "duration_ms": 5000, "artifacts": []},
|
|
57
|
+
{"name": "plan", "status": "running"}
|
|
58
|
+
]
|
|
59
|
+
}
|
|
60
|
+
```
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
## Integration Points
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
- `dag-orchestration` skill — step dependency resolution + tracker coordination
|
|
65
|
+
- `pipeline-guards` skill — guard gate state preservation
|
|
66
|
+
- `pipeline` skill — `/pipeline resume` state loader
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
## Rules Compliance
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
- R006: Agent artifact; skills (dag-orchestration, pipeline-guards) are source
|
|
71
|
+
- R010: File modifications via Write/Edit (prefer over Bash for .claude/ paths)
|
|
72
|
+
- R017: Structural changes require sauron verification
|
|
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ nodes:
|
|
|
57
57
|
depends_on: [test, review, docs]
|
|
58
58
|
|
|
59
59
|
config:
|
|
60
|
-
max_parallel: 4 # R009
|
|
60
|
+
max_parallel: 4 # R009 soft default (hard cap: 5)
|
|
61
61
|
failure_strategy: stop # stop | skip | retry
|
|
62
62
|
retry_count: 2 # Max retries per node (if strategy=retry)
|
|
63
63
|
timeout_per_node: 300 # Seconds per node (0 = no limit)
|
|
@@ -76,7 +76,11 @@ config:
|
|
|
76
76
|
c. On completion:
|
|
77
77
|
- Success → decrement in-degree of dependents
|
|
78
78
|
- Failure → apply failure_strategy
|
|
79
|
-
d.
|
|
79
|
+
d. Stall check:
|
|
80
|
+
- If running node duration > 2x average completed duration
|
|
81
|
+
- AND pending nodes exist with in-degree = 0 (ignoring stalled node's edges)
|
|
82
|
+
- THEN enqueue those independent nodes immediately (adaptive split)
|
|
83
|
+
e. Enqueue newly-ready nodes (in-degree = 0)
|
|
80
84
|
6. Verify all nodes executed (detect unreachable nodes)
|
|
81
85
|
```
|
|
82
86
|
|
|
@@ -84,11 +88,12 @@ config:
|
|
|
84
88
|
|
|
85
89
|
| Rule | Detail |
|
|
86
90
|
|------|--------|
|
|
87
|
-
| Max parallel |
|
|
91
|
+
| Max parallel | 5 concurrent nodes max, 4 default (R009) |
|
|
88
92
|
| Agent Teams gate | 3+ parallel nodes → check R018 eligibility |
|
|
89
93
|
| Orchestrator only | DAG scheduling runs in main conversation (R010) |
|
|
90
94
|
| Node execution | Each node = one Task tool call to specified agent |
|
|
91
95
|
| State tracking | `/tmp/.claude-dag-$PPID.json` |
|
|
96
|
+
| Stall detection | Running node > 2x avg completed duration → enqueue independent pending nodes early |
|
|
92
97
|
|
|
93
98
|
## Failure Strategies
|
|
94
99
|
|
|
@@ -193,9 +198,47 @@ Execute? [Y/n]
|
|
|
193
198
|
|
|
194
199
|
The orchestrator builds the DAG from this inline format and executes using the same algorithm.
|
|
195
200
|
|
|
201
|
+
## State Management via tracker-checkpoint
|
|
202
|
+
|
|
203
|
+
Pipeline 상태는 `tracker-checkpoint` 에이전트로 위임됩니다.
|
|
204
|
+
|
|
205
|
+
### Flow
|
|
206
|
+
|
|
207
|
+
1. Pipeline 시작 → orchestrator가 tracker-checkpoint 호출 → 초기 state 파일 생성 (`/tmp/.claude-pipeline-{name}-{PPID}.json`)
|
|
208
|
+
2. 각 step 후 → tracker-checkpoint가 state 업데이트 (atomic write)
|
|
209
|
+
3. step 실패 → tracker-checkpoint가 halted 상태로 freeze
|
|
210
|
+
4. `/pipeline resume` → tracker-checkpoint가 state 로드 → orchestrator에 복원 옵션 제공
|
|
211
|
+
|
|
212
|
+
### Integration
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
- PPID-scoped state file 경로: `/tmp/.claude-pipeline-{name}-{PPID}.json`
|
|
215
|
+
- step 실행 전후로 tracker-checkpoint delegation
|
|
216
|
+
- resume 시 checkpoint → dag 재빌드 → 미완료 step부터 재개
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
See `.claude/agents/tracker-checkpoint.md` for agent spec.
|
|
219
|
+
|
|
196
220
|
## Limitations
|
|
197
221
|
|
|
198
222
|
- No cycles allowed (DAG = acyclic)
|
|
199
223
|
- Max 20 nodes per workflow (complexity guard)
|
|
200
224
|
- Nested DAGs not supported (flatten instead)
|
|
201
225
|
- Cross-workflow dependencies not supported
|
|
226
|
+
|
|
227
|
+
## External References
|
|
228
|
+
|
|
229
|
+
### Multica — Managed Agent Platform
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
> Reference: [Multica](https://github.com/multica-ai/multica) — managed agent platform for Claude Code/Codex.
|
|
232
|
+
> Verdict: INTEGRATE (external reference, not internalize)
|
|
233
|
+
|
|
234
|
+
Multica's task lifecycle pattern (enqueue → claim → start → complete/fail) is a useful reference for DAG node state management:
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
| Multica State | DAG Equivalent | Notes |
|
|
237
|
+
|---------------|---------------|-------|
|
|
238
|
+
| enqueue | pending | Node waiting for dependencies |
|
|
239
|
+
| claim | ready | Dependencies resolved, ready to execute |
|
|
240
|
+
| start | running | Agent spawned and executing |
|
|
241
|
+
| complete | completed | Node finished successfully |
|
|
242
|
+
| fail | failed | Node execution failed |
|
|
243
|
+
|
|
244
|
+
Consider this pattern when extending DAG node state tracking or implementing retry logic.
|
|
@@ -19,11 +19,13 @@ Defines mandatory safety constraints for all pipeline, workflow, and iterative e
|
|
|
19
19
|
| Max iterations | 3 | 5 | worker-reviewer-pipeline |
|
|
20
20
|
| Max DAG nodes | 20 | 30 | dag-orchestration |
|
|
21
21
|
| Max parallel agents | 4 | 5 | R009 (all pipelines) |
|
|
22
|
+
| Max parallel steps | 4 | 4 | pipeline parallel blocks |
|
|
22
23
|
| Timeout per node | 300s | 600s | dag-orchestration nodes |
|
|
23
24
|
| Timeout per pipeline | 900s | 1800s | worker-reviewer-pipeline |
|
|
24
25
|
| Max retry count | 2 | 3 | Failure retry strategies |
|
|
25
26
|
| Max PR improvement items | 20 | 50 | pr-auto-improve |
|
|
26
27
|
| Max auto-improve items | 20 | 50 | omcustom-auto-improve |
|
|
28
|
+
| Max files per agent | 10 | 15 | All agent spawns (advisory) |
|
|
27
29
|
|
|
28
30
|
## Enforcement
|
|
29
31
|
|
|
@@ -82,6 +84,23 @@ When guards are triggered, they integrate with existing advisory systems:
|
|
|
82
84
|
| Timeout approaching (80%) | → warn user, suggest early termination |
|
|
83
85
|
| Hard cap hit | → force stop, report to user |
|
|
84
86
|
|
|
87
|
+
## Task Granularity Guard
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
Advisory guard for agent task scope. When a single agent is assigned too many files, it becomes a bottleneck in parallel execution.
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
| Signal | Default | Action |
|
|
92
|
+
|--------|---------|--------|
|
|
93
|
+
| Files per agent > 10 | Advisory warning | Suggest splitting by layer/domain |
|
|
94
|
+
| Files per agent > 15 | Hard warning | Require explicit user override |
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
Display:
|
|
97
|
+
```
|
|
98
|
+
[Guard] ⚠ Agent assigned {n} files (> 10) — consider splitting by layer
|
|
99
|
+
[Guard] 🛑 Agent assigned {n} files (> 15) — requires explicit override
|
|
100
|
+
```
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
This integrates with R009 Adaptive Parallel Splitting: if a stalled agent is detected AND it was assigned > 10 files, the splitting recommendation is stronger.
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
85
104
|
## Guard Configuration
|
|
86
105
|
|
|
87
106
|
Pipelines can override defaults (within hard caps):
|
|
@@ -157,6 +176,26 @@ Guard warnings appear inline:
|
|
|
157
176
|
| omcustom-auto-improve | Auto-improve item count limits |
|
|
158
177
|
| stuck-recovery | Guard triggers feed into stuck detection |
|
|
159
178
|
| model-escalation | Repeated failures trigger escalation advisory |
|
|
179
|
+
| task-decomposition | Subtask file counts validated against granularity guard thresholds |
|
|
180
|
+
|
|
181
|
+
## Checkpoint Gate Integration
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
각 guard 통과/실패 시 `tracker-checkpoint` 에이전트로 gate state 기록.
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
### Flow
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
1. Guard 진입 → tracker-checkpoint에 gate state: running 기록
|
|
188
|
+
2. Guard 통과 → tracker-checkpoint에 gate state: passed + metrics 기록
|
|
189
|
+
3. Guard 실패 → tracker-checkpoint에 gate state: failed + failure reason freeze
|
|
190
|
+
4. 다음 단계는 checkpoint state 참조하여 재개/중단 판단
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
### Benefits
|
|
193
|
+
|
|
194
|
+
- 긴 파이프라인에서 guard 지점마다 복원점 확보
|
|
195
|
+
- 부분 실패 시 직전 guard 지점부터 재시도 가능 (비용 절감)
|
|
196
|
+
- guard metrics 축적으로 품질 추이 관찰 가능
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
See `.claude/agents/tracker-checkpoint.md` for the tracker spec.
|
|
160
199
|
|
|
161
200
|
## Override Policy
|
|
162
201
|
|
|
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|
|
2
2
|
name: sdd-dev
|
|
3
3
|
description: Spec-Driven Development workflow — enforces sdd/ folder hierarchy with planning-first gates, current-state artifacts, and completion verification
|
|
4
4
|
scope: core
|
|
5
|
-
version: 1.
|
|
5
|
+
version: 1.1.0
|
|
6
6
|
user-invocable: true
|
|
7
7
|
argument-hint: "[task description or leave empty for guided workflow]"
|
|
8
8
|
---
|
|
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ sdd/
|
|
|
27
27
|
├── 03_build/ # Current build state, implementation notes
|
|
28
28
|
├── 04_verify/ # Verification evidence, test results, residual risks
|
|
29
29
|
├── 05_operate/ # Deployment notes, runbooks (conditional)
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
30
|
+
├── 99_toolchain/ # Tool configs, scripts, environment setup
|
|
31
|
+
└── decisions/ # Decision records for major design choices
|
|
31
32
|
```
|
|
32
33
|
|
|
33
34
|
**Key Principle**: These folders are **current-state artifacts**, not history archives. Each file reflects the current state of the work — update in place rather than appending new versions.
|
|
@@ -44,7 +45,7 @@ ls sdd/ 2>/dev/null || echo "sdd/ folder not found"
|
|
|
44
45
|
|
|
45
46
|
If `sdd/` does not exist:
|
|
46
47
|
1. Inform the user that SDD workflow requires a `sdd/` folder
|
|
47
|
-
2. Offer to create the folder structure: `mkdir -p sdd/{01_planning,02_plan,03_build,04_verify,05_operate,99_toolchain}`
|
|
48
|
+
2. Offer to create the folder structure: `mkdir -p sdd/{01_planning,02_plan,03_build,04_verify,05_operate,99_toolchain,decisions}`
|
|
48
49
|
3. Ask user to confirm before proceeding
|
|
49
50
|
|
|
50
51
|
If `sdd/` exists, continue to Step 1.
|
|
@@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ Artifact to produce or update: `sdd/03_build/current.md`
|
|
|
121
122
|
|
|
122
123
|
## Decisions Made
|
|
123
124
|
- {decision}: {rationale}
|
|
125
|
+
- Write DR for major decisions: sdd/decisions/{YYYY-MM-DD}-{topic}.md (template: templates/decision-record.md)
|
|
124
126
|
|
|
125
127
|
## Known Issues
|
|
126
128
|
- {issue}: {planned resolution}
|
|
@@ -235,6 +237,18 @@ Final display:
|
|
|
235
237
|
3. **Checkboxes reflect reality**: Do NOT pre-check criteria. Update checkboxes as work is verified.
|
|
236
238
|
4. **Residual risks are honest**: List known risks even after passing. Hiding risks defeats the purpose.
|
|
237
239
|
|
|
240
|
+
## Decision Record Template
|
|
241
|
+
|
|
242
|
+
Major design decisions during Step 3 are recorded in `sdd/decisions/{YYYY-MM-DD}-{topic}.md` using the template at `templates/decision-record.md` (relative to this skill directory).
|
|
243
|
+
|
|
244
|
+
When to create a Decision Record:
|
|
245
|
+
- Architectural choice between 2+ viable options
|
|
246
|
+
- Trade-off accepted (e.g., complexity for performance)
|
|
247
|
+
- Deferred decision (waiting for data/approval)
|
|
248
|
+
- Superseding a previous decision
|
|
249
|
+
|
|
250
|
+
See `guides/harness-engineering/` for harness-level decision context that DRs may reference.
|
|
251
|
+
|
|
238
252
|
## Integration with Other Skills
|
|
239
253
|
|
|
240
254
|
| Skill | When to Use Together |
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
title: {Decision title}
|
|
3
|
+
date: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
4
|
+
status: proposed | accepted | superseded | deprecated
|
|
5
|
+
context: guides/harness-engineering/README.md
|
|
6
|
+
decision_makers: [{agent or role}]
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# {Decision title}
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Context
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
{What is the problem and why is a decision needed? Include relevant constraints, goals, and the situation that makes this decision necessary.}
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Options Considered
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
1. **Option A**: {Description}
|
|
18
|
+
- Pros: {benefits}
|
|
19
|
+
- Cons: {drawbacks, trade-offs}
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
2. **Option B**: {Description}
|
|
22
|
+
- Pros: {benefits}
|
|
23
|
+
- Cons: {drawbacks, trade-offs}
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
3. **Option C** *(if applicable)*: {Description}
|
|
26
|
+
- Pros: {benefits}
|
|
27
|
+
- Cons: {drawbacks, trade-offs}
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Decision
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
**Chosen**: Option {A|B|C}
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
{Explain the rationale for the choice. Why does this option best satisfy the constraints and goals from the Context section?}
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## Consequences
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
- **Positive**: {What improves as a result of this decision}
|
|
38
|
+
- **Negative**: {Trade-offs and costs accepted}
|
|
39
|
+
- **Risks**: {Future considerations, potential issues to monitor}
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## References
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
- guides/harness-engineering/README.md
|
|
44
|
+
- {related skill or agent, e.g. .claude/skills/action-validator/SKILL.md}
|
|
45
|
+
- {link to issue or PR if applicable}
|
package/templates/CLAUDE.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ oh-my-customcode로 구동됩니다.
|
|
|
114
114
|
project/
|
|
115
115
|
+-- CLAUDE.md # 진입점
|
|
116
116
|
+-- .claude/
|
|
117
|
-
| +-- agents/ # 서브에이전트 정의 (
|
|
117
|
+
| +-- agents/ # 서브에이전트 정의 (49 파일)
|
|
118
118
|
| +-- skills/ # 스킬 (113 디렉토리)
|
|
119
119
|
| +-- rules/ # 전역 규칙 (R000-R022)
|
|
120
120
|
| +-- hooks/ # 훅 스크립트 (보안, 검증, HUD)
|
|
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ oh-my-customcode는 소프트웨어 컴파일과 동일한 구조를 따릅니
|
|
|
173
173
|
| Infra Engineer | 2 | infra-docker-expert, infra-aws-expert |
|
|
174
174
|
| QA Team | 3 | qa-planner, qa-writer, qa-engineer |
|
|
175
175
|
| Manager | 6 | mgr-creator, mgr-updater, mgr-supplier, mgr-gitnerd, mgr-sauron, mgr-claude-code-bible |
|
|
176
|
-
| System |
|
|
177
|
-
| **총계** | **
|
|
176
|
+
| System | 4 | sys-memory-keeper, sys-naggy, tracker-checkpoint, wiki-curator |
|
|
177
|
+
| **총계** | **49** | |
|
|
178
178
|
|
|
179
179
|
## Agent Teams (MUST when enabled)
|
|
180
180
|
|
|
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ Deep Insight가 제안하는 4계층 구조는 oh-my-customcode에 이미 구현
|
|
|
46
46
|
메인 대화 → Agent(mgr-creator, mode: "bypassPermissions") → Write(".claude/agents/new.md", content)
|
|
47
47
|
```
|
|
48
48
|
|
|
49
|
-
### Tracker 체크포인트 패턴
|
|
49
|
+
### Tracker 체크포인트 패턴
|
|
50
50
|
|
|
51
|
-
현재 파이프라인 상태 추적은 `/tmp/.claude-pipeline-{PID}.json` 파일과 `.claude/outputs/sessions/{YYYY-MM-DD}/` 아티팩트 규약으로 구현되어 있습니다. 전용 Tracker 에이전트(dag-orchestration / pipeline-guards 통합형)
|
|
51
|
+
현재 파이프라인 상태 추적은 `/tmp/.claude-pipeline-{PID}.json` 파일과 `.claude/outputs/sessions/{YYYY-MM-DD}/` 아티팩트 규약으로 구현되어 있습니다. ✅ 구현 완료 (v0.106.1 via #983 — `.claude/agents/tracker-checkpoint.md`): 전용 Tracker 에이전트(dag-orchestration / pipeline-guards 통합형)가 배포되어 checkpoint persistence, resume-after-failure, gate state 기록을 담당합니다.
|
|
52
52
|
|
|
53
53
|
---
|
|
54
54
|
|
|
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ opt-in: hard-enforce (filter 모드, --hard-enforce 플래그) — 명시적 사
|
|
|
185
185
|
|
|
186
186
|
| 항목 | 이관 이유 | 예상 릴리즈 |
|
|
187
187
|
|------|----------|-----------|
|
|
188
|
-
| **Tracker 체크포인트 에이전트** — dag-orchestration / pipeline-guards 통합형 전용 Tracker |
|
|
188
|
+
| **Tracker 체크포인트 에이전트** — dag-orchestration / pipeline-guards 통합형 전용 Tracker | ✅ 구현 완료 (v0.106.1 via #983 — `.claude/agents/tracker-checkpoint.md`) | — |
|
|
189
189
|
| **hierarchical-agent-topology 스킬** — 4계층 구조를 자동 검증하는 전용 스킬 | fork 스킬 cap 해소 후 추가 | v0.106.0+ |
|
|
190
190
|
| **sdd-dev Harness Decision Record 템플릿** — 하네스 설계 결정을 ADR 형식으로 기록 | sdd-dev 스킬 업데이트와 병행 | v0.107.0+ |
|
|
191
191
|
| **harness-synthesizer 2단계 격리 구현 예시** — Base64 인코딩 + subprocess 격리의 실제 YAML 예시 | 보안 리뷰 후 추가 | v0.107.0+ |
|
package/templates/manifest.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
|
-
"version": "0.106.
|
|
2
|
+
"version": "0.106.1",
|
|
3
3
|
"lastUpdated": "2026-04-24T07:30:00.000Z",
|
|
4
4
|
"components": [
|
|
5
5
|
{
|
|
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
|
|
|
12
12
|
"name": "agents",
|
|
13
13
|
"path": ".claude/agents",
|
|
14
14
|
"description": "AI agent definitions (flat .md files with prefixes)",
|
|
15
|
-
"files":
|
|
15
|
+
"files": 49
|
|
16
16
|
},
|
|
17
17
|
{
|
|
18
18
|
"name": "skills",
|