oh-my-codex-cli 0.1.0

package/.agent/skills/agent-kb/references/intelligent-analysis-explained.md

@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+# Intelligent Analysis System - Technical Details
+
+## Architecture Overview
+
+```
+User Query
+    ↓
+├─→ Semantic Search (~/Agent-KB/claude_kb_query_optimized.py)
+│   ├─ Vector database query
+│   ├─ Keyword matching
+│   └─ Similarity ranking
+│   ↓
+├─→ Retrieve Top Cases (Top 10-20 matches)
+│   ↓
+├─→ Local LLM Analysis (~/Agent-KB/intelligent_summarizer.py)
+│   ├─ Context understanding
+│   ├─ Pattern extraction
+│   ├─ Insight synthesis
+│   └─ Recommendation generation
+│   ↓
+└─→ 400-Word Summary
+    ├─ Core recommendations
+    ├─ Quantitative metrics
+    ├─ Common pitfalls
+    ├─ Best practices
+    └─ Related topics
+```
+
+## Two-Tier System
+
+### Tier 1: Optimized Query (Fallback)
+
+**Script**: `claude_kb_query_optimized.py`
+
+**What it does**:
+- Semantic search across 300+ cases
+- Returns raw case content (2500+ words)
+- No LLM processing
+- Fast but verbose
+
+**When to use**:
+- Need complete case details
+- `intelligent_summarizer.py` times out
+- Want to see original expert responses
+
+### Tier 2: Intelligent Summarization (Primary)
+
+**Script**: `intelligent_summarizer.py`
+
+**What it does**:
+- Calls `claude_kb_query_optimized.py` for retrieval
+- Processes results with local LLM
+- Synthesizes into 400-word summary
+- Adds confidence scores and metrics
+
+**Benefits**:
+- 83% context reduction (2500+ → 400 words)
+- Actionable insights extracted
+- Patterns identified across cases
+- Confidence levels added
+
+## LLM Analysis Process
+
+### Step 1: Context Understanding
+
+LLM analyzes query intent:
+```
+Query: "How to optimize React list rendering?"
+
+Intent detected:
+- Domain: Frontend performance
+- Technology: React
+- Problem: Rendering efficiency
+- Scale: Lists (likely large)
+```
+
+### Step 2: Case Relevance Filtering
+
+LLM filters retrieved cases:
+```
+10 cases retrieved
+↓
+7 cases relevant (React performance)
+↓
+5 cases highly relevant (list rendering)
+↓
+3 cases with metrics (quantified improvements)
+```
+
+### Step 3: Pattern Extraction
+
+LLM identifies common patterns:
+```
+Pattern 1: Memoization (React.memo, useMemo, useCallback)
+- Frequency: 5/5 cases
+- Confidence: Very High
+
+Pattern 2: Virtualization (react-window, react-virtualized)
+- Frequency: 4/5 cases
+- Confidence: High
+
+Pattern 3: Pagination/Infinite Scroll
+- Frequency: 3/5 cases
+- Confidence: Medium
+```
+
+### Step 4: Insight Synthesis
+
+LLM synthesizes recommendations:
+```
+Primary recommendation: React.memo + useMemo for expensive computations
+Supporting data: 60-80% re-render reduction (from cases)
+Confidence: High (consistent across 5 cases)
+
+Secondary recommendation: Virtualization for 1000+ items
+Supporting data: 95%+ performance gain (from 4 cases)
+Confidence: High
+
+Tertiary recommendation: Pagination/infinite scroll
+Supporting data: User experience trade-off
+Confidence: Medium (depends on use case)
+```
+
+### Step 5: Output Generation
+
+LLM generates structured output:
+```markdown
+### Core Recommendations
+1. Use React.memo for expensive components
+2. useMemo for heavy computations
+3. Virtualization (react-window) for 1000+ items
+
+### Quantitative Metrics
+- React.memo: 60-80% re-render reduction
+- useMemo: 40-70% computation time savings
+- Virtualization: 95%+ performance gain for large lists
+
+### Common Pitfalls
+- Over-memoization adds complexity
+- Missing dependencies in useMemo/useCallback
+- Premature optimization
+
+### Best Practices
+1. Profile with React DevTools first
+2. Measure before/after impact
+3. Focus on frequently re-rendering components
+```
+
+## Context Optimization Details
+
+### Token Reduction Strategy
+
+**Before optimization**:
+```
+10 cases × 250 words = 2500 words
+Token count: ~3000 tokens
+Reading time: 10 minutes
+```
+
+**After optimization**:
+```
+Synthesized summary: 400 words
+Token count: ~500 tokens (83% reduction)
+Reading time: 2 minutes
+```
+
+### Information Preservation
+
+**What's kept**:
+- Actionable recommendations (100%)
+- Quantitative metrics (100%)
+- Common patterns (100%)
+- Best practices (100%)
+
+**What's removed**:
+- Duplicate information across cases
+- Verbose explanations
+- Context-specific details not applicable to query
+- Preamble and conclusions
+
+## Confidence Scoring
+
+### Confidence Levels
+
+**Very High (90-100%)**:
+- Recommendation appears in 80%+ of cases
+- Consistent metrics across cases
+- No contradictory information
+- Example: "Use Redis for caching" (95% confidence)
+
+**High (75-89%)**:
+- Recommendation in 60-79% of cases
+- Mostly consistent metrics
+- Minor variations explained
+- Example: "PostgreSQL for transactional data" (80% confidence)
+
+**Medium (50-74%)**:
+- Recommendation in 40-59% of cases
+- Some contradictory evidence
+- Context-dependent
+- Example: "Microservices for team of 20" (60% confidence)
+
+**Low (<50%)**:
+- Limited case coverage
+- Significant contradictory information
+- Highly context-dependent
+- Example: "NoSQL for all use cases" (30% confidence)
+
+### Confidence Calculation
+
+```
+Confidence Score = (
+    Frequency Score (40%) +
+    Consistency Score (30%) +
+    Metric Quality Score (20%) +
+    Recency Score (10%)
+)
+
+Frequency Score = cases_with_recommendation / total_relevant_cases
+Consistency Score = 1 - (std_dev of metrics / mean)
+Metric Quality Score = cases_with_quantified_results / total_cases
+Recency Score = weighted by case timestamp (recent cases weighted higher)
+```
+
+## Performance Characteristics
+
+### Cold Query (First Time)
+
+```
+Semantic search: 5s
+LLM analysis: 3s
+Total: ~8s
+```
+
+### Cached Query (Repeated)
+
+```
+Cache lookup: 0.001s
+Total: ~0.001s (8000x faster)
+```
+
+### Cache Hit Rate
+
+```
+Common questions (10%): ~100% hit rate
+Similar questions (30%): ~80% hit rate (partial match)
+Novel questions (60%): 0% hit rate (cold query)
+
+Overall hit rate: ~35% (gradually increasing)
+```
+
+## Knowledge Base Coverage
+
+### Domain Distribution
+
+```
+Frontend (40%):
+- React/Vue/Angular performance
+- State management patterns
+- Component design
+- Build optimization
+
+Backend (30%):
+- API design (REST, GraphQL)
+- Database optimization
+- Microservices patterns
+- Authentication/authorization
+
+Database (15%):
+- SQL query optimization
+- NoSQL data modeling
+- Indexing strategies
+- Replication/sharding
+
+Architecture (10%):
+- System design patterns
+- Scalability strategies
+- Distributed systems
+- Event-driven architecture
+
+DevOps (5%):
+- CI/CD pipelines
+- Deployment strategies
+- Monitoring/alerting
+- Infrastructure as code
+```
+
+### Quality Metrics
+
+```
+Cases with quantitative metrics: 70%
+Cases with code examples: 60%
+Cases with failure analysis: 50%
+Cases updated in last 6 months: 40%
+```
+
+## Limitations
+
+### What It Does Well ✅
+
+- Common patterns and best practices
+- Performance optimization advice
+- Technology trade-off analysis
+- Well-covered domains (React, Node.js, PostgreSQL)
+
+### What It Struggles With ❌
+
+- Very new technologies (<6 months old)
+- Niche use cases with few cases
+- Highly context-specific problems
+- Bleeding-edge experimental techniques
+
+### When to Complement with Other Skills
+
+**Use agent-kb + multi-model-research when**:
+- Need current technology analysis (agent-kb is historical)
+- Want fresh perspectives + validated patterns
+- Critical decision needing multiple viewpoints
+
+**Use agent-kb + thinkdeep when**:
+- Need deep reasoning beyond historical cases
+- Novel problem without precedent
+- Complex trade-off analysis
+
+## Future Enhancements
+
+### Planned Improvements
+
+1. **Real-time case updates**: Auto-import from Agent-KB records
+2. **Confidence trending**: Track how confidence changes over time
+3. **Case quality scoring**: Prioritize high-quality cases
+4. **Hybrid retrieval**: Combine semantic + keyword search
+5. **User feedback loop**: Learn from query refinements

package/.agent/skills/agent-kb/references/query-optimization.md

@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+# Agent-KB Query Optimization Guide
+
+## Query Formulation Best Practices
+
+### Include Specific Context
+
+**Good queries** ✅:
+```
+"How to optimize PostgreSQL queries with 10M+ rows and complex joins?"
+"React performance optimization for list with 10,000+ items and frequent updates"
+"Microservices communication pattern for 50+ services with event sourcing"
+```
+
+**Poor queries** ❌:
+```
+"Optimize database"
+"React performance"
+"Microservices pattern"
+```
+
+### Use Domain-Specific Keywords
+
+**Technology stack**:
+- Languages: JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust
+- Frameworks: React, Vue, Express, Django, Spring Boot
+- Databases: PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis, Cassandra
+- Infrastructure: Kubernetes, Docker, AWS, GCP
+
+**Problem domain**:
+- Performance, scalability, security
+- Real-time, batch processing, stream processing
+- Microservices, monolith, serverless
+
+**Constraints**:
+- User scale (100k, 1M, 10M users)
+- Data volume (1GB, 100GB, 10TB)
+- Latency requirements (<100ms, <1s)
+- Team size (5, 20, 100 developers)
+
+## Query Patterns
+
+### Pattern 1: "How to" Questions
+
+```
+"How to [action] [technology] for [use case] with [constraints]?"
+```
+
+**Examples**:
+- "How to scale Redis cluster for 1M concurrent connections with <10ms latency?"
+- "How to implement GraphQL subscriptions in Node.js for real-time dashboard with 50k clients?"
+
+### Pattern 2: Comparison Questions
+
+```
+"[Technology A] vs [Technology B] for [use case] - pros/cons?"
+```
+
+**Examples**:
+- "PostgreSQL vs MongoDB for product catalog with complex filtering - trade-offs?"
+- "REST vs GraphQL for mobile app with 50+ API endpoints?"
+
+### Pattern 3: Best Practice Questions
+
+```
+"Best practices for [technology/pattern] in [context]?"
+```
+
+**Examples**:
+- "Best practices for error handling in microservices with async communication?"
+- "Code organization best practices for React app with 100+ components?"
+
+## Cache Behavior
+
+### When Queries Are Cached
+
+- **Exact match**: Same query text (case-sensitive)
+- **Cache duration**: Indefinite (until manual clear)
+- **Cache location**: `~/Agent-KB/.cache/`
+- **Cache hit**: ~0.001s response time
+
+### When to Clear Cache
+
+```bash
+rm -rf ~/Agent-KB/.cache/
+```
+
+**Clear when**:
+- Query should reflect updated knowledge base
+- Corrupted cache entries
+- Testing new query formulations
+
+## Iteration Strategies
+
+### Start Broad, Then Narrow
+
+```
+Query 1: "Microservices communication patterns"
+↓ (get overview)
+Query 2: "Synchronous vs asynchronous communication in microservices"
+↓ (pick approach)
+Query 3: "Message queue selection for microservices - Kafka vs RabbitMQ"
+↓ (get specific)
+Query 4: "Kafka configuration for microservices with 1M messages/day"
+```
+
+### Follow-Up Questions
+
+After initial analysis:
+- "Can you provide code examples for [recommendation]?"
+- "What are common pitfalls with [approach]?"
+- "How to migrate from [current] to [recommended]?"
+
+## Query Refinement
+
+### If Results Are Too Generic
+
+**Add**:
+- Specific technologies
+- Scale/constraints
+- Business context
+- Team considerations
+
+**Example**:
+```
+Generic: "API rate limiting"
+↓
+Refined: "API rate limiting for public API with 1M requests/day using Express.js and Redis"
+```
+
+### If Results Are Off-Topic
+
+**Refine by**:
+- Using different keywords
+- Adding exclusions (e.g., "not focusing on X")
+- Specifying scope (e.g., "backend only, not frontend")
+
+## Advanced Query Techniques
+
+### Multi-Dimensional Queries
+
+Ask for analysis across multiple dimensions:
+```
+"Analyze Redis vs Memcached across:
+- Performance (throughput, latency)
+- Operational complexity
+- Feature set (data structures, persistence)
+- Cost (infrastructure, developer time)
+- Team expertise required"
+```
+
+### Constraint-Based Queries
+
+Explicitly state constraints:
+```
+"How to implement real-time notifications with:
+- Budget: $500/month for 100k users
+- Team: 5 developers, backend focus
+- Stack: Node.js, PostgreSQL, AWS
+- Timeline: 3 weeks to MVP"
+```
+
+### Trade-Off Analysis Queries
+
+Request explicit trade-off analysis:
+```
+"Trade-offs between:
+- Microservices vs modular monolith
+Given:
+- Team size: 15 developers
+- Traffic: 500k DAU
+- Complexity: 8 bounded contexts
+- Deployment frequency: Daily"
+```
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+### Problem: Results Don't Match Question
+
+**Cause**: Keyword mismatch with knowledge base
+
+**Solution**: Try synonyms
+```
+"REST API" → "HTTP API", "Web service API"
+"caching" → "cache strategy", "memoization"
+"microservices" → "service-oriented architecture", "distributed systems"
+```
+
+### Problem: Results Too Shallow
+
+**Cause**: Query too broad
+
+**Solution**: Add specificity
+```
+"Performance optimization"
+↓
+"React component re-render optimization for large lists (1000+ items)"
+```
+
+### Problem: Multiple Topics Mixed
+
+**Cause**: Query covers too much
+
+**Solution**: Split into separate queries
+```
+"Authentication and caching strategy"
+↓
+Query 1: "JWT vs session-based authentication for React + Node.js SaaS"
+Query 2: "Redis caching strategy for authenticated API responses"
+```
+
+## Query Success Metrics
+
+**Good result indicators**:
+- Specific, actionable recommendations
+- Quantitative metrics (e.g., "40% reduction in render time")
+- Code examples or patterns
+- Clear decision criteria
+- Common pitfalls identified
+
+**Poor result indicators**:
+- Generic advice ("consider best practices")
+- No metrics or benchmarks
+- No code examples
+- Vague recommendations
+- Missing context