nsauditor-ai 0.2.52 → 0.2.53

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. package/README.md +5 -5
  2. package/package.json +2 -2
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ NSAuditor AI is the open-source core of a privacy-first security intelligence pl
17
17
 
18
18
  ## What's New
19
19
 
20
- **Latest: CE 0.2.52 + Enterprise 0.45.0 — the Enterprise NTP clock attestation is WITHDRAWN.** The probe
20
+ **Latest: CE 0.2.53 + Enterprise 0.46.0 — a documentation release: the PCI DSS claims in this README were wrong.** The Enterprise cycle derived the PCI Customized-Approach eligibility set from PCI DSS v4.0.1 itself rather than from a transcribed list, and this README carried the transcribed one: a stale triple (now **19 covered / 9 partial / 44 OOS across 72**), a retired `MVP-67` density label, an "Appendix E" attribution that names the wrong appendix, and a sampling citation that belongs to Section 6. No scanner change and no plugin change — Community stays at 27 plugins. **npm freezes a README at publish time, which is why a doc-only correction gets a version.**
21
21
  is deleted: it validated any reply of at least 48 bytes with a non-null transmit timestamp and nothing
22
22
  else — no mode byte, no stratum, no originate echo — so over unauthenticated UDP a datagram of the right
23
23
  shape produced a false clean reading, and it measured the SCANNER's own clock rather than your estate.
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ If you're heading into a **SOC 2, HIPAA, NIST CSF 2.0, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, CIS C
168
168
  - **SOC 2** (AICPA TSC 2017) — 10 fully-covered + 4 partial controls
169
169
  - **HIPAA Security Rule §164.312** — 7 covered + 3 partial Technical Safeguards; **Zero BAA required** (ePHI never leaves your infrastructure)
170
170
  - **NIST CSF 2.0 Core** (NIST CSWP 29, Feb 2024) — 13 covered + 10 partial Subcategories across 106 of CSF 2.0's 107 Subcategories; Subcategory-level mapping (auditor-canonical, not high-level Function/Category claims)
171
- - **PCI DSS v4.0.1** (PCI SSC, June 2024 errata; v3.2.1 retired March 31, 2024) — **19 covered + 9 partial + 39 OOS sub-requirements across 67 of ~250 (MVP-67)**; sub-requirement-level mapping for QSA Report on Compliance workflow; Defined-vs-Customized Approach discipline per Appendix E (15 Defined-only sub-requirements enforced at schema layer); CHD Scope operator-attested via CDE Data Flow Diagram per Req 1.2.4; Card-brand AOC enforcement priority view (Visa CISP / Mastercard SDP / Amex DSOP / Discover DISC)
171
+ - **PCI DSS v4.0.1** (PCI SSC, June 2024 errata; v3.2.1 retired March 31, 2024) — **19 covered + 9 partial + 44 OOS sub-requirements across 72 of ~250**; sub-requirement-level mapping for QSA Report on Compliance workflow; Defined-vs-Customized Approach discipline enforced at the schema layer, derived from the standard rather than from a list: PCI DSS v4.0.1 states ineligibility in each requirement's own Customized Approach Objective cell, not in an appendix, and no sub-requirement mapped here is ineligible; CHD Scope operator-attested via CDE Data Flow Diagram per Req 1.2.4; Card-brand AOC enforcement priority view (Visa CISP / Mastercard SDP / Amex DSOP / Discover DISC)
172
172
  - **ISO/IEC 27001:2022** (ISO + IEC, Oct 2022; 2013 edition retired Oct 31, 2025) — **17 covered + 14 partial + 62 OOS across 93 Annex A controls** (the complete Annex A universe); per-Annex-A-code mapping auditor-canonical for ISO/IEC 17021-1 certification body assessors; Statement of Applicability per Clause 6.1.3.d discipline + ISMS Clauses 4-10 OOS-by-design with 7 Major Nonconformity classes
173
173
  - **CIS Critical Security Controls v8** (CIS, May 2021; v8.1 errata June 2024) — **17 covered + 23 partial + 113 OOS across 153 Safeguards / 18 Controls**; per-Safeguard mapping with the **Implementation Group cumulative discipline** (IG1=56 cyber-insurance baseline / IG2 cumulative=130 / IG3 cumulative=153); no-certification-body attestation discipline (INPUT to your CSAT / CIS-CAT Pro self-attestation, never "CIS certified"); Cloud Companion Guide v8 shared-responsibility + CIS-Hardened-Image substrate-evidence credit (4.1/4.2/4.6)
174
174
  - **GDPR Article 32 (Security of Processing)** (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) — **4 covered + 5 partial + 2 OOS across 11 Art. 32 sub-measure units**; **GDPR Article 32 infrastructure substrate only — NOT GDPR compliance** (GDPR is a 99-article legal regime; Art. 32 security-of-processing is the only article an infrastructure scanner can substrate-evidence; the rest is operator-side, out of scope by design). Four-factor proportionality (substrate *for* your "appropriate to the risk" determination, never an absolute pass/fail); personal-data-scope attestation (pair with your Art. 30 records of processing); **Art. 83(4) lower fine tier** (€10M/2%, not the €20M/4% headline tier); Art. 32(3)/Art. 42 cloud-provider certification-inheritance
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ How Marketplace fulfillment works (ZDE and air-gap preserved — no runtime AWS
215
215
  | SOC 2 (AICPA TSC 2017) — 10 covered + 4 partial controls | — | — | ✅ |
216
216
  | HIPAA Security Rule §164.312 — Zero BAA required | — | — | ✅ |
217
217
  | NIST CSF 2.0 Core — Subcategory-level mapping (106 of 107 Subcategories) | — | — | ✅ |
218
- | PCI DSS v4.0.1 — Sub-requirement-level mapping for QSA RoC (MVP-67) | — | — | ✅ |
218
+ | PCI DSS v4.0.1 — Sub-requirement-level mapping for QSA RoC | — | — | ✅ |
219
219
  | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 — per-Annex-A-code mapping + SoA discipline (93 Annex A controls) | — | — | ✅ |
220
220
  | CIS Critical Security Controls v8 — per-Safeguard mapping + IG-cumulative discipline (153 Safeguards / 18 Controls) | — | — | ✅ |
221
221
  | **GDPR Article 32 (Security of Processing)** — Art. 32 infrastructure substrate (4 covered + 5 partial + 2 OOS / 11 sub-measure units); **not GDPR compliance** · Art. 83(4) lower fine tier | — | — | ✅ |
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ Results land in `./out/<host>_<timestamp>/`:
421
421
  | — | SOC 2 Compliance Engine | Enterprise | AICPA TSC 2017 mapping (10 covered + 4 partial controls), SHA-256 chain-of-custody, opt-in RFC 3161 timestamps, exercised against a live TSA on both the npm path and the `:0.33.0` container image, and the suppression workflow. (Ed25519 SIGNING of suppressions is reachable from EE 0.35.0 and PROVEN at EE 0.36.0, verified per approver holding **key material**.) |
422
422
  | — | **HIPAA Compliance Engine (EE 0.9.0)** | Enterprise | HIPAA Security Rule §164.312 Technical Safeguards mapping (7 covered + 3 partial + 45 OOS within §164.312 + entire §164.308 + entire §164.310). HHS Required/Addressable discipline per control. Same evidence infrastructure as SOC 2 (SHA-256 chain-of-custody; opt-in RFC 3161 timestamps; suppression signing reachable from EE 0.35.0, proven at EE 0.36.0 and verified per approver holding **key material**). Use `--compliance hipaa` or `--compliance soc2,hipaa` for dual-framework reports from a single scan. **Zero BAA required** — Zero Data Exfiltration architecture means ePHI never leaves customer infrastructure. |
423
423
  | — | **NIST CSF 2.0 Compliance Engine (EE 0.10.0)** | Enterprise | NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Core mapping at the auditor-canonical Subcategory level — 13 covered + 10 partial + 83 OOS across 106 of CSF 2.0's 107 Subcategories. Govern function OOS-by-design (GV.SC-04 partial as substrate exception); Respond function OOS-entirely; Implementation Tiers 1-4 OOS as organizational-maturity claims. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 + CIS Critical Security Controls v8 cross-references baked into `informativeReferences`. Use `--compliance nist-csf` or `--compliance soc2,hipaa,nist-csf` for triple-framework reports from a single scan. |
424
- | — | **PCI DSS v4.0.1 Compliance Engine (EE 0.11.0)** | Enterprise | PCI DSS v4.0.1 (PCI SSC, June 2024 errata; supersedes v4.0 March 2022; v3.2.1 retired March 31, 2024) mapping at the auditor-canonical sub-requirement level for QSA Report on Compliance workflow — **19 covered + 9 partial + 39 OOS across 67 of ~250 sub-requirements (MVP-67 density)** (Req 7.2.2 down-rated covered→partial in EE 0.19.4 — access-by-job-classification is process/HR-gated). Req 12 Information Security Program OOS-by-design entirely. Req 5 anti-malware + Req 9 physical OOS-entirely. **Defined-vs-Customized Approach discipline per Appendix E** — 15 Defined-only sub-requirements enforced at schema layer. **Cardholder Data Environment (CDE) scope operator-attested** via CDE Data Flow Diagram per Req 1.2.4 + Req 12.5.1. **Card-brand AOC enforcement priority view** (Visa CISP / Mastercard SDP / Amex DSOP / Discover DISC). **4 load-bearing schema enrichments** per control: `controlType` + `approachEligibility` + `cloudProviderAttestation` (AWS / Azure / GCP currently-named AOCs) + `cdeScope`. CAO MVP-deferred to EE 0.11.1. Use `--compliance pci-dss` or `--compliance soc2,hipaa,nist-csf,pci-dss` for quad-framework reports from a single scan. |
424
+ | — | **PCI DSS v4.0.1 Compliance Engine (EE 0.11.0)** | Enterprise | PCI DSS v4.0.1 (PCI SSC, June 2024 errata; supersedes v4.0 March 2022; v3.2.1 retired March 31, 2024) mapping at the auditor-canonical sub-requirement level for QSA Report on Compliance workflow — **19 covered + 9 partial + 39 OOS across 67 of ~250 sub-requirements (MVP-67 density)** (Req 7.2.2 down-rated covered→partial in EE 0.19.4 — access-by-job-classification is process/HR-gated). Req 12 Information Security Program OOS-by-design entirely. Req 5 anti-malware + Req 9 physical OOS-entirely. **Defined-vs-Customized Approach discipline per Appendix E** — 15 Defined-only sub-requirements enforced at schema layer. ⚠️ **That doctrine is CORRECTED and the figures above are left as the 0.11.0 record:** PCI DSS v4.0.1 states ineligibility in each requirement's own Customized Approach Objective cell, never in an appendix, and the enumeration this line described was wrong about most of its members. **Cardholder Data Environment (CDE) scope operator-attested** via CDE Data Flow Diagram per Req 1.2.4 + Req 12.5.1. **Card-brand AOC enforcement priority view** (Visa CISP / Mastercard SDP / Amex DSOP / Discover DISC). **4 load-bearing schema enrichments** per control: `controlType` + `approachEligibility` + `cloudProviderAttestation` (AWS / Azure / GCP currently-named AOCs) + `cdeScope`. CAO MVP-deferred to EE 0.11.1. Use `--compliance pci-dss` or `--compliance soc2,hipaa,nist-csf,pci-dss` for quad-framework reports from a single scan. |
425
425
  | — | **ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Compliance Engine (EE 0.12.0)** | Enterprise | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (ISO + IEC, October 2022; 2013 edition retired October 31, 2025) Annex A mapping at the auditor-canonical per-Annex-A-code level for ISO/IEC 17021-1 certification body assessors — **17 covered + 14 partial + 62 OOS across 93 Annex A controls** (the complete Annex A universe across 4 themes: A.5 Organizational 37 + A.6 People 8 + A.7 Physical 14 + A.8 Technological 34). **Statement of Applicability per Clause 6.1.3.d discipline** — engine produces substrate for INCLUDED controls; SoA inclusion/exclusion is operator-side. **ISMS Clauses 4-10 OOS-by-design** with 7 Major Nonconformity classes (absence of internal audit per Clause 9.2 OR management review per Clause 9.3 = auto-fail Stage 2). 11 NEW 2022 controls + 5-attribute taxonomy (cybersecurityConcepts 5 categories, NOT 6 like NIST CSF) + 2013-to-2022 transition discipline + Cloud-Provider Certificate Inheritance Matrix. Use `--compliance iso-27001` or any combination for multi-framework reports from a single scan. |
426
426
  | — | **CIS Critical Security Controls v8 Compliance Engine (EE 0.13.0)** | Enterprise | CIS Controls v8 (Center for Internet Security, May 2021; v8.1 errata June 2024) mapping at the per-Safeguard level (the atomic, attestable unit; coverage claimed at the SAFEGUARD level, never the Control level) — **17 covered + 23 partial + 113 OOS across 153 Safeguards / 18 Controls**. **Implementation Group cumulative discipline** — IG1=56 (cyber-insurance baseline; ~50-70% of mid-market policies require IG1 attestation), IG2 cumulative=130, IG3 cumulative=153; smallest-IG-membership tagging (NEVER report IG2 as 74-of-74 in isolation). **No-certification-body attestation discipline** — engine output is INPUT to CSAT / CIS-CAT Pro self-attestation OR a SOC 2 auditor cross-validating CIS scope, never "CIS certified." Cloud Companion Guide v8 shared-responsibility-model boundary + CIS-Hardened-Image substrate-evidence credit (Safeguards 4.1/4.2/4.6) + 5 Security Functions (NOT 6 — no Govern) + 6 Asset Types + MS-ISAC/EI-ISAC/H-ISAC sector baselines + v7.1-to-v8 cross-reference. Use `--compliance cis-v8` or `--compliance soc2,hipaa,nist-csf,pci-dss,iso-27001,cis-v8,gdpr` for hepta-framework reports from a single scan. |
427
427
  | — | **GDPR Article 32 Compliance Engine (EE 0.20.0)** | Enterprise | **GDPR Article 32 (Security of Processing)** infrastructure substrate (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) — **4 covered + 5 partial + 2 OOS across 11 Art. 32 sub-measure units** (the 7th framework). **This is GDPR Article 32 infrastructure substrate ONLY — NOT GDPR compliance.** GDPR is a 99-article legal regime; Art. 32 security-of-processing is the only article whose evidence is technical infrastructure state, so the rest of GDPR (lawful basis, consent, DSARs, records of processing, DPIAs, transfers) is operator-side and out of scope by design. **Four-factor proportionality** — Art. 32 measures are "appropriate to the risk" taking into account state-of-the-art / cost / nature-scope-context-purposes / risk; nothing is an absolute pass/fail, the engine produces substrate *for* the operator's determination. **Personal-data-scope attestation** — the scanner reads configuration, not data classification; a finding is an Art. 32 concern only if the resource processes personal data (pair with your Art. 30 records of processing). Controller-vs-processor role applicability + Art. 28 processor agreements. **Art. 83(4) lower fine tier** — Art. 32 infringements cap at €10M or 2% of turnover, NOT the €20M / 4% Art. 83(5) headline tier (which is for the basic principles + data-subject rights). Art. 32(3)/Art. 42 cloud-provider certification-inheritance (ISO 27001 / SOC 2 / C5 / EU Cloud CoC adherence as an element of demonstrable compliance, not a substitute). Use `--compliance gdpr` or any combination for multi-framework reports from a single scan. |
@@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ NSAUDITOR_PLUGIN_PATH= # Additional plugin directories (colon-
1012
1012
  **Longitudinal compliance evidence (Enterprise CLI, new alongside the variables below):**
1013
1013
 
1014
1014
  A single scan shows configuration at an instant. A SOC 2 Type II auditor — and the ISO
1015
- surveillance cadence, PCI Appendix E sampling, HIPAA §164.312(b) and GDPR Art. 32(1)(d)
1015
+ surveillance cadence, PCI DSS v4.0.1 Section 6 sampling (the assessor's documented determination; the standard prescribes no size), HIPAA §164.312(b) and GDPR Art. 32(1)(d)
1016
1016
  equivalents — asks whether controls operated over a *period*. Every scan has always written
1017
1017
  a per-framework `scan_attestation_<framework>.json`, so a history you already have is
1018
1018
  aggregatable today:
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "nsauditor-ai",
3
- "version": "0.2.52",
4
- "description": "Modular AI-assisted network security audit platform \u2014 Community Edition",
3
+ "version": "0.2.53",
4
+ "description": "Modular AI-assisted network security audit platform — Community Edition",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "private": false,
7
7
  "scripts": {