nightytidy 0.3.7 → 0.3.9
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/bin/nightytidy.js +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/src/agent/git-integration.js +4 -1
- package/src/claude.js +1 -1
- package/src/prompts/manifest.json +138 -138
- package/src/prompts/steps/02-test-coverage.md +181 -181
- package/src/prompts/steps/03-test-hardening.md +181 -181
- package/src/prompts/steps/04-test-architecture.md +130 -130
- package/src/prompts/steps/05-test-consolidation.md +165 -165
- package/src/prompts/steps/06-test-quality.md +211 -211
- package/src/prompts/steps/07-api-design.md +165 -165
- package/src/prompts/steps/08-security-sweep.md +207 -207
- package/src/prompts/steps/09-dependency-health.md +217 -217
- package/src/prompts/steps/10-codebase-cleanup.md +189 -189
- package/src/prompts/steps/11-crosscutting-concerns.md +196 -196
- package/src/prompts/steps/12-file-decomposition.md +263 -263
- package/src/prompts/steps/13-code-elegance.md +329 -329
- package/src/prompts/steps/14-architectural-complexity.md +297 -297
- package/src/prompts/steps/15-type-safety.md +192 -192
- package/src/prompts/steps/16-logging-error-message.md +173 -173
- package/src/prompts/steps/17-data-integrity.md +139 -139
- package/src/prompts/steps/18-performance.md +183 -183
- package/src/prompts/steps/19-cost-resource-optimization.md +136 -136
- package/src/prompts/steps/20-error-recovery.md +145 -145
- package/src/prompts/steps/21-race-condition-audit.md +178 -178
- package/src/prompts/steps/22-bug-hunt.md +229 -229
- package/src/prompts/steps/23-frontend-quality.md +210 -210
- package/src/prompts/steps/24-uiux-audit.md +284 -284
- package/src/prompts/steps/25-state-management.md +170 -170
- package/src/prompts/steps/26-perceived-performance.md +190 -190
- package/src/prompts/steps/27-devops.md +165 -165
- package/src/prompts/steps/28-scheduled-job-chron-jobs.md +141 -141
- package/src/prompts/steps/29-observability.md +152 -152
- package/src/prompts/steps/30-backup-check.md +155 -155
- package/src/prompts/steps/31-product-polish-ux-friction.md +122 -122
- package/src/prompts/steps/32-feature-discovery-opportunity.md +128 -128
- package/src/prompts/steps/33-strategic-opportunities.md +217 -217
|
@@ -1,122 +1,122 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Product Polish & UX Friction Audit
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
READ-ONLY analysis. Do not modify any code.
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
## Ground Rules
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
- Evaluate as a **user**, not a developer. "The code handles this correctly" is irrelevant if the user can't tell.
|
|
8
|
-
- Be specific: not "onboarding could be better" but "after signup, user lands on an empty dashboard with no guidance."
|
|
9
|
-
- Classify every issue: **broken** / **confusing** / **incomplete** / **missing**.
|
|
10
|
-
- Severity = frequency × pain. Trace every flow.
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
---
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
## Phase 1: User Journey Mapping
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
**Entry points** — Trace each: signup, login, invite link, OAuth, magic link, public pages, shared links, API, CLI, deep links.
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
**Core journeys per user role:**
|
|
19
|
-
- First use: signup → onboarding → first meaningful action → "aha moment"
|
|
20
|
-
- Core loop: the daily/weekly workflow
|
|
21
|
-
- Configuration: settings, profile, team/org management
|
|
22
|
-
- Edge cases: account recovery, plan changes, data export, deletion
|
|
23
|
-
- Exit points: dead ends, confusing branches, flows that just stop
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
**Secondary flows** — Notifications, search, filtering, sorting, bulk actions, imports/exports, integrations, billing, admin.
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
---
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## Phase 2: First-Use & Onboarding
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
**Signup:** Step count, field necessity, email verification clarity (cross-device?), OAuth permission scope & failure fallback, error specificity (duplicate email, weak password, etc.).
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
**First experience:** What appears post-signup — empty state, tutorial, or sample data? Clear path to first action? Blocking setup steps? Skippable onboarding? Progress saved if user leaves?
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
**Empty states:** For every list/dashboard/feed — what shows with zero data? Does it guide the user toward populating it?
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
---
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
## Phase 3: Core Workflow
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
**Primary workflow:** Click/step count for common actions. Unnecessary confirmations? Missing confirmations on destructive actions? Undo support? Save clarity (auto vs. manual, feedback)?
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
**Forms & inputs:** Required/optional marking, inline vs. submit-only validation, sensible defaults, helpful placeholders, error display (all vs. first), input preservation on failure, progress for long forms, timezone/date format clarity.
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
**Navigation:** Location awareness (breadcrumbs, active states, titles), back-navigation (browser + in-app), information architecture logic, deep link shareability & permissions.
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
**Feedback & loading:** Immediate feedback on every action? Click-and-nothing-happens cases? Progress for long operations? Safe to navigate away? Retry without re-entry on failure?
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
---
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
## Phase 4: Edge Cases & Errors
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
**Destructive actions:** Confirmation with consequences explained? Undo available & obvious? Cascade effects communicated? Bulk action extra confirmation with count?
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
**Common error states:** Network offline, session expired (unsaved work?), permission denied (actionable message?), not found (helpful or generic 404?), rate limited (wait guidance?), file upload failures (size/type/network — all communicated?).
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
**Concurrency:** Two users editing same resource — conflict handling? Multi-tab state sync? Stale data refresh?
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
**Boundaries:** Long text (truncation/overflow/layout break?), special characters/emoji/RTL, large datasets (1000+ items — pagination/virtualization/performance?), minimum-input functionality.
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
---
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
## Phase 5: Settings & Configuration
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
**Every setting:** Discoverable? Explained? Immediate or requires save? Resettable to default? Dangerous settings guarded?
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
**Missing settings users would expect:** Notification preferences, display prefs, timezone, language, default views, keyboard shortcuts, data export.
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
**Account management:** Change email/password/name? Delete account (clear, complete process)? Team invite/role/removal flows? Data fate on leave/deletion?
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
---
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
## Phase 6: Notifications
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
**Inventory all** emails, in-app, push, webhooks: trigger, content quality, user control (opt-out, frequency, channel).
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
**Transactional:** Welcome email usefulness, password reset clarity & expiry, invite context, billing transparency.
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
---
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
## Phase 7: Accessibility Quick Scan
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
Flag obvious issues only (defer full audit): keyboard-only core flow completion, color-only information, screen reader labels on interactive elements, mobile responsiveness.
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
---
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
## Output
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
Save as `audit-reports/31_PRODUCT_POLISH_REPORT_[run-number]_[date]_[time in user's local time].md`.
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
### Report Sections
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
1. **Executive Summary** — Overall polish level (rough/fair/good/polished), worst friction, journey health.
|
|
94
|
-
2. **User Journey Map** — All flows traced, health per flow (smooth / some friction / significant friction / broken).
|
|
95
|
-
3. **Critical Friction Points** — Table: Flow | Location (file/component) | Issue | Severity | Type
|
|
96
|
-
4. **First-Use & Onboarding** — Signup friction, onboarding gaps, empty states.
|
|
97
|
-
5. **Core Workflow** — Step-by-step assessment, friction, feedback, form quality.
|
|
98
|
-
6. **Edge Cases & Errors** — Destructive action safety, error quality, boundaries.
|
|
99
|
-
7. **Settings & Account** — Gaps, account management, configuration polish.
|
|
100
|
-
8. **Notifications** — Inventory, quality, missing notifications, user control.
|
|
101
|
-
9. **Accessibility Notes** — Obvious issues only.
|
|
102
|
-
10. **Recommendations** — Priority-ordered by effort: quick fixes (hours) / medium (days) / larger (weeks).
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
**Report rules:** Don't pad — if a flow is smooth, say so in one line. Note items requiring a running app as "verify in running app."
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
---
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
## Chat Summary (Required)
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
Print directly in conversation — don't make the user open the file.
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
1. **Status Line** — One sentence: what you did.
|
|
113
|
-
2. **Key Findings** — Most important friction points, specific and actionable.
|
|
114
|
-
3. **Recommendations** (only if warranted):
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
| # | Recommendation | Impact | Risk if Ignored | Worth Doing? | Details |
|
|
117
|
-
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
118
|
-
| *#* | *≤10 words* | *What improves* | *Low/Med/High/Critical* | *Yes/Probably/Only if time* | *1–3 sentences* |
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
Order by risk descending. Be honest in "Worth Doing?" — if marginal, say so.
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
122
|
-
4. **Report Location** — Full file path.
|
|
1
|
+
# Product Polish & UX Friction Audit
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
READ-ONLY analysis. Do not modify any code.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## Ground Rules
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
- Evaluate as a **user**, not a developer. "The code handles this correctly" is irrelevant if the user can't tell.
|
|
8
|
+
- Be specific: not "onboarding could be better" but "after signup, user lands on an empty dashboard with no guidance."
|
|
9
|
+
- Classify every issue: **broken** / **confusing** / **incomplete** / **missing**.
|
|
10
|
+
- Severity = frequency × pain. Trace every flow.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
---
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## Phase 1: User Journey Mapping
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
**Entry points** — Trace each: signup, login, invite link, OAuth, magic link, public pages, shared links, API, CLI, deep links.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
**Core journeys per user role:**
|
|
19
|
+
- First use: signup → onboarding → first meaningful action → "aha moment"
|
|
20
|
+
- Core loop: the daily/weekly workflow
|
|
21
|
+
- Configuration: settings, profile, team/org management
|
|
22
|
+
- Edge cases: account recovery, plan changes, data export, deletion
|
|
23
|
+
- Exit points: dead ends, confusing branches, flows that just stop
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
**Secondary flows** — Notifications, search, filtering, sorting, bulk actions, imports/exports, integrations, billing, admin.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
---
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Phase 2: First-Use & Onboarding
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
**Signup:** Step count, field necessity, email verification clarity (cross-device?), OAuth permission scope & failure fallback, error specificity (duplicate email, weak password, etc.).
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
**First experience:** What appears post-signup — empty state, tutorial, or sample data? Clear path to first action? Blocking setup steps? Skippable onboarding? Progress saved if user leaves?
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
**Empty states:** For every list/dashboard/feed — what shows with zero data? Does it guide the user toward populating it?
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
---
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
## Phase 3: Core Workflow
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
**Primary workflow:** Click/step count for common actions. Unnecessary confirmations? Missing confirmations on destructive actions? Undo support? Save clarity (auto vs. manual, feedback)?
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
**Forms & inputs:** Required/optional marking, inline vs. submit-only validation, sensible defaults, helpful placeholders, error display (all vs. first), input preservation on failure, progress for long forms, timezone/date format clarity.
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
**Navigation:** Location awareness (breadcrumbs, active states, titles), back-navigation (browser + in-app), information architecture logic, deep link shareability & permissions.
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
**Feedback & loading:** Immediate feedback on every action? Click-and-nothing-happens cases? Progress for long operations? Safe to navigate away? Retry without re-entry on failure?
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
---
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## Phase 4: Edge Cases & Errors
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**Destructive actions:** Confirmation with consequences explained? Undo available & obvious? Cascade effects communicated? Bulk action extra confirmation with count?
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
**Common error states:** Network offline, session expired (unsaved work?), permission denied (actionable message?), not found (helpful or generic 404?), rate limited (wait guidance?), file upload failures (size/type/network — all communicated?).
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
**Concurrency:** Two users editing same resource — conflict handling? Multi-tab state sync? Stale data refresh?
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
**Boundaries:** Long text (truncation/overflow/layout break?), special characters/emoji/RTL, large datasets (1000+ items — pagination/virtualization/performance?), minimum-input functionality.
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
---
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
## Phase 5: Settings & Configuration
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
**Every setting:** Discoverable? Explained? Immediate or requires save? Resettable to default? Dangerous settings guarded?
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
**Missing settings users would expect:** Notification preferences, display prefs, timezone, language, default views, keyboard shortcuts, data export.
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
**Account management:** Change email/password/name? Delete account (clear, complete process)? Team invite/role/removal flows? Data fate on leave/deletion?
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
---
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
## Phase 6: Notifications
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
**Inventory all** emails, in-app, push, webhooks: trigger, content quality, user control (opt-out, frequency, channel).
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
**Transactional:** Welcome email usefulness, password reset clarity & expiry, invite context, billing transparency.
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
---
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
## Phase 7: Accessibility Quick Scan
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
Flag obvious issues only (defer full audit): keyboard-only core flow completion, color-only information, screen reader labels on interactive elements, mobile responsiveness.
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
---
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
## Output
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
Save as `audit-reports/31_PRODUCT_POLISH_REPORT_[run-number]_[date]_[time in user's local time].md`.
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
### Report Sections
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
1. **Executive Summary** — Overall polish level (rough/fair/good/polished), worst friction, journey health.
|
|
94
|
+
2. **User Journey Map** — All flows traced, health per flow (smooth / some friction / significant friction / broken).
|
|
95
|
+
3. **Critical Friction Points** — Table: Flow | Location (file/component) | Issue | Severity | Type
|
|
96
|
+
4. **First-Use & Onboarding** — Signup friction, onboarding gaps, empty states.
|
|
97
|
+
5. **Core Workflow** — Step-by-step assessment, friction, feedback, form quality.
|
|
98
|
+
6. **Edge Cases & Errors** — Destructive action safety, error quality, boundaries.
|
|
99
|
+
7. **Settings & Account** — Gaps, account management, configuration polish.
|
|
100
|
+
8. **Notifications** — Inventory, quality, missing notifications, user control.
|
|
101
|
+
9. **Accessibility Notes** — Obvious issues only.
|
|
102
|
+
10. **Recommendations** — Priority-ordered by effort: quick fixes (hours) / medium (days) / larger (weeks).
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
**Report rules:** Don't pad — if a flow is smooth, say so in one line. Note items requiring a running app as "verify in running app."
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
---
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
## Chat Summary (Required)
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
Print directly in conversation — don't make the user open the file.
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
1. **Status Line** — One sentence: what you did.
|
|
113
|
+
2. **Key Findings** — Most important friction points, specific and actionable.
|
|
114
|
+
3. **Recommendations** (only if warranted):
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
| # | Recommendation | Impact | Risk if Ignored | Worth Doing? | Details |
|
|
117
|
+
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
118
|
+
| *#* | *≤10 words* | *What improves* | *Low/Med/High/Critical* | *Yes/Probably/Only if time* | *1–3 sentences* |
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
Order by risk descending. Be honest in "Worth Doing?" — if marginal, say so.
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
4. **Report Location** — Full file path.
|
|
@@ -1,128 +1,128 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Feature Discovery & Opportunity Audit
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
Read the entire codebase. Identify features, capabilities, and improvements worth building — grounded purely in what exists, what's partial, and what the architecture supports.
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
**READ-ONLY. No web search. No code changes.**
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
---
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
## Rules
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
- Every recommendation must reference specific files, models, or patterns.
|
|
12
|
-
- Distinguish: **natural extensions** (80%+ done), **logical additions** (users would expect), **ambitious opportunities** (differentiators).
|
|
13
|
-
- Quality over quantity. 10 well-reasoned opportunities > 50 shallow ones.
|
|
14
|
-
- Be honest about effort and maintenance burden. "Add AI" is not a recommendation — specify data, infrastructure, and minimal viable version.
|
|
15
|
-
- Don't recommend features that conflict with the product's design intent.
|
|
16
|
-
- Prioritize features leveraging existing data/infrastructure over new systems.
|
|
17
|
-
- You have all night. Read everything.
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
---
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
## Phase 1: Deep Codebase Understanding
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
**Product model** — What it does, who it serves, every feature, the full data model (entities, relationships, collected data), user roles/permissions, monetization (free/paid/tiers/gating), integrations.
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
**Architecture capabilities** — Background jobs, notification systems (email/push/in-app/webhooks), file handling, search (full-text/filtering/faceting), real-time (WebSockets/SSE), API surface & patterns, event/audit tracking.
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
---
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## Phase 2: Unfinished & Abandoned Features
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
**Partially built features** — Look for:
|
|
32
|
-
- DB tables/columns with no UI or API exposure
|
|
33
|
-
- Models/types defined but unused in routes/components
|
|
34
|
-
- Feature flags permanently off (read the guarded code)
|
|
35
|
-
- Routes/endpoints not linked from UI; unreachable components/pages
|
|
36
|
-
- TODO/FIXME comments describing planned features
|
|
37
|
-
- Migrations adding schema for unfinished features
|
|
38
|
-
- Config/env vars for unintegrated services
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
For each: what was it, how far did it get, what would finish it?
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
**Vestigial infrastructure** — Libraries barely used, notification infra sending only one type, permission systems more granular than needed, underutilized search/webhook/queue systems. These are sunk investment awaiting ROI.
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
---
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
## Phase 3: Data-Driven Opportunities
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
**Inventory all collected data** — User actions/events, timestamps, entity relationships, stored-but-unsurfaced metadata, computed-but-undisplayed aggregations.
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
**Underutilized data** — Analytics/insights, personalization signals, automation triggers, collaborative signals, historical trends. For each: what data exists → what feature it enables → existing pipeline support → effort.
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
**Missing data** — Features that need data not yet collected. What's the minimal collection that unlocks the most value?
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
---
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
## Phase 4: Pattern-Based Feature Discovery
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
**Generalization** — Hardcoded reports → report builder. Single notification type → configurable system. Fixed workflow → customizable engine. Single integration → framework. Manual admin → self-service. Single export → multi-format. Fixed views → customizable dashboards.
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
**Cross-entity features** — Unified search, activity feeds, bulk operations, broad tagging/categorization, universal comments/notes, import/export gaps.
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
**Power user features** — Keyboard shortcuts, saved filters/views, bulk editing, templates, API access, advanced search, custom fields, scheduled/recurring actions.
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
**Admin & ops** — Missing admin views, audit logging gaps, user impersonation, data export, usage analytics, health dashboards.
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
---
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
## Phase 5: Automation & Intelligence
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
**Automate manual processes** — Repetitive action patterns (macros), predictable status transitions, inferable data entry, condition-triggered notifications, manual cleanup tasks.
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
**Smart defaults** — Fields users fill identically, likely next actions, adaptive settings, context-based pre-population.
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
**AI-augmentable features** — Text generation/summarization, manual classification, semantic search, auto-tagging, NL summaries of data, answering questions from product data. For each: what's augmented, what data feeds it, what infra exists, minimal viable version.
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
---
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
## Phase 6: Platform Opportunities
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
**API-as-product** — Is the API exposable to third parties? What internal capabilities would externals pay for? Could webhook/event patterns power an integration ecosystem?
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
82
|
-
**Multi-tenancy / white-label** — Tenant-aware data model? Configurable branding? Partner resale/embedding potential?
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
**Extensibility** — Custom fields/views/workflows? Plugin architecture potential? Natural integration boundaries?
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
86
|
-
---
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
## Output
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
Save as `audit-reports/32_FEATURE_DISCOVERY_REPORT_[run-number]_[date]_[time in user's local time].md`.
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
### Report Structure
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
1. **Executive Summary** — Maturity assessment, opportunity count by category, top 5 highest-value, overall untapped potential.
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
2. **Unfinished Features** — Table: Feature | Evidence (files/tables) | Completion % | Effort to Finish | Value | Recommendation
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
3. **Underutilized Infrastructure** — Table: Infrastructure | Current Usage | Potential Usage | Effort | Value
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
4. **Data Opportunities** — Underutilized: Data Available | Feature Enabled | Pipeline Support | Effort | Impact. Missing: Feature Desired | Data Needed | Collection Effort
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
5. **Feature Opportunities** (main deliverable) — Per feature: Name/description, Category (natural extension / logical addition / ambitious), Evidence (specific code references), Existing foundation (% estimate), Effort (days/weeks/months with specifics), Impact, Dependencies, Priority (Critical / High / Medium / Nice-to-have)
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
6. **Automation & Intelligence** — Manual→automated, smart defaults, AI opportunities with data/infra grounding.
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
7. **Platform Opportunities** — API, multi-tenancy, extensibility assessments.
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
8. **Recommended Build Order** — Priority sequence by dependencies and effort-to-value. Group: quick wins (days), medium (weeks), strategic (months).
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
---
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
## Chat Summary (Required)
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
Print directly in conversation — don't make the user open the report.
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
1. **Status** — One sentence: what you did.
|
|
117
|
-
2. **Key Findings** — Specific, grounded bullets. Lead with value. (e.g., "The `user_events` table tracks every action but nothing surfaces it — a dashboard is low-effort since `jobs/daily_stats.ts` already aggregates.")
|
|
118
|
-
3. **Recommendations** table:
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
| # | Recommendation | Impact | Risk if Ignored | Worth Doing? | Details |
|
|
121
|
-
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
122
|
-
| | ≤10 words | What improves | Low–Critical | Yes / Probably / Only if time | 1–3 sentences |
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
124
|
-
Order by value descending. Be honest — not everything is worth the engineering time. If nothing worth building was found, say so.
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
126
|
-
4. **Report Location** — Full path to the detailed report.
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
If a phase yielded zero findings, say so in one line.
|
|
1
|
+
# Feature Discovery & Opportunity Audit
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Read the entire codebase. Identify features, capabilities, and improvements worth building — grounded purely in what exists, what's partial, and what the architecture supports.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
**READ-ONLY. No web search. No code changes.**
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Rules
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
- Every recommendation must reference specific files, models, or patterns.
|
|
12
|
+
- Distinguish: **natural extensions** (80%+ done), **logical additions** (users would expect), **ambitious opportunities** (differentiators).
|
|
13
|
+
- Quality over quantity. 10 well-reasoned opportunities > 50 shallow ones.
|
|
14
|
+
- Be honest about effort and maintenance burden. "Add AI" is not a recommendation — specify data, infrastructure, and minimal viable version.
|
|
15
|
+
- Don't recommend features that conflict with the product's design intent.
|
|
16
|
+
- Prioritize features leveraging existing data/infrastructure over new systems.
|
|
17
|
+
- You have all night. Read everything.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
---
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Phase 1: Deep Codebase Understanding
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
**Product model** — What it does, who it serves, every feature, the full data model (entities, relationships, collected data), user roles/permissions, monetization (free/paid/tiers/gating), integrations.
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
**Architecture capabilities** — Background jobs, notification systems (email/push/in-app/webhooks), file handling, search (full-text/filtering/faceting), real-time (WebSockets/SSE), API surface & patterns, event/audit tracking.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
---
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Phase 2: Unfinished & Abandoned Features
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
**Partially built features** — Look for:
|
|
32
|
+
- DB tables/columns with no UI or API exposure
|
|
33
|
+
- Models/types defined but unused in routes/components
|
|
34
|
+
- Feature flags permanently off (read the guarded code)
|
|
35
|
+
- Routes/endpoints not linked from UI; unreachable components/pages
|
|
36
|
+
- TODO/FIXME comments describing planned features
|
|
37
|
+
- Migrations adding schema for unfinished features
|
|
38
|
+
- Config/env vars for unintegrated services
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
For each: what was it, how far did it get, what would finish it?
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
**Vestigial infrastructure** — Libraries barely used, notification infra sending only one type, permission systems more granular than needed, underutilized search/webhook/queue systems. These are sunk investment awaiting ROI.
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
---
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
## Phase 3: Data-Driven Opportunities
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
**Inventory all collected data** — User actions/events, timestamps, entity relationships, stored-but-unsurfaced metadata, computed-but-undisplayed aggregations.
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
**Underutilized data** — Analytics/insights, personalization signals, automation triggers, collaborative signals, historical trends. For each: what data exists → what feature it enables → existing pipeline support → effort.
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
**Missing data** — Features that need data not yet collected. What's the minimal collection that unlocks the most value?
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
---
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## Phase 4: Pattern-Based Feature Discovery
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
**Generalization** — Hardcoded reports → report builder. Single notification type → configurable system. Fixed workflow → customizable engine. Single integration → framework. Manual admin → self-service. Single export → multi-format. Fixed views → customizable dashboards.
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
**Cross-entity features** — Unified search, activity feeds, bulk operations, broad tagging/categorization, universal comments/notes, import/export gaps.
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
**Power user features** — Keyboard shortcuts, saved filters/views, bulk editing, templates, API access, advanced search, custom fields, scheduled/recurring actions.
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
**Admin & ops** — Missing admin views, audit logging gaps, user impersonation, data export, usage analytics, health dashboards.
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
---
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
## Phase 5: Automation & Intelligence
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
**Automate manual processes** — Repetitive action patterns (macros), predictable status transitions, inferable data entry, condition-triggered notifications, manual cleanup tasks.
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
**Smart defaults** — Fields users fill identically, likely next actions, adaptive settings, context-based pre-population.
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
**AI-augmentable features** — Text generation/summarization, manual classification, semantic search, auto-tagging, NL summaries of data, answering questions from product data. For each: what's augmented, what data feeds it, what infra exists, minimal viable version.
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
---
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
## Phase 6: Platform Opportunities
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
**API-as-product** — Is the API exposable to third parties? What internal capabilities would externals pay for? Could webhook/event patterns power an integration ecosystem?
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
**Multi-tenancy / white-label** — Tenant-aware data model? Configurable branding? Partner resale/embedding potential?
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
**Extensibility** — Custom fields/views/workflows? Plugin architecture potential? Natural integration boundaries?
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
---
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
## Output
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
Save as `audit-reports/32_FEATURE_DISCOVERY_REPORT_[run-number]_[date]_[time in user's local time].md`.
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
### Report Structure
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
1. **Executive Summary** — Maturity assessment, opportunity count by category, top 5 highest-value, overall untapped potential.
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
2. **Unfinished Features** — Table: Feature | Evidence (files/tables) | Completion % | Effort to Finish | Value | Recommendation
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
3. **Underutilized Infrastructure** — Table: Infrastructure | Current Usage | Potential Usage | Effort | Value
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
4. **Data Opportunities** — Underutilized: Data Available | Feature Enabled | Pipeline Support | Effort | Impact. Missing: Feature Desired | Data Needed | Collection Effort
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
5. **Feature Opportunities** (main deliverable) — Per feature: Name/description, Category (natural extension / logical addition / ambitious), Evidence (specific code references), Existing foundation (% estimate), Effort (days/weeks/months with specifics), Impact, Dependencies, Priority (Critical / High / Medium / Nice-to-have)
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
6. **Automation & Intelligence** — Manual→automated, smart defaults, AI opportunities with data/infra grounding.
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
7. **Platform Opportunities** — API, multi-tenancy, extensibility assessments.
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
8. **Recommended Build Order** — Priority sequence by dependencies and effort-to-value. Group: quick wins (days), medium (weeks), strategic (months).
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
---
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
## Chat Summary (Required)
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
Print directly in conversation — don't make the user open the report.
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
1. **Status** — One sentence: what you did.
|
|
117
|
+
2. **Key Findings** — Specific, grounded bullets. Lead with value. (e.g., "The `user_events` table tracks every action but nothing surfaces it — a dashboard is low-effort since `jobs/daily_stats.ts` already aggregates.")
|
|
118
|
+
3. **Recommendations** table:
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
| # | Recommendation | Impact | Risk if Ignored | Worth Doing? | Details |
|
|
121
|
+
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
122
|
+
| | ≤10 words | What improves | Low–Critical | Yes / Probably / Only if time | 1–3 sentences |
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
Order by value descending. Be honest — not everything is worth the engineering time. If nothing worth building was found, say so.
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
4. **Report Location** — Full path to the detailed report.
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
If a phase yielded zero findings, say so in one line.
|