nexus-agents 8.54.14 → 8.54.15

package/dist/{chunk-GOJL7V5S.js → chunk-2EIW5DWE.js}

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 import {
   VERSION
-} from "./chunk-BOXTTA7E.js";
+} from "./chunk-NQ4ROOA3.js";
 import {
   emitClawGuardViolation
 } from "./chunk-MG7XTYJW.js";
@@ -2374,4 +2374,4 @@ export {
   DEFAULT_CONSENSUS_CONFIG,
   ConsensusMetricsSchema
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-GOJL7V5S.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-2EIW5DWE.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-UAHOUDJG.js → chunk-BD3Y6A5Q.js}

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import {
   toolStructuredError,
   toolSuccessStructured,
   wrapToolWithTimeout
-} from "./chunk-GOJL7V5S.js";
+} from "./chunk-2EIW5DWE.js";
 import {
   JsonlStore,
   SECURITY_KEYWORDS,
@@ -2278,4 +2278,4 @@ export {
   runImprovementReview,
   registerImprovementReviewTool
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-UAHOUDJG.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-BD3Y6A5Q.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-BOXTTA7E.js → chunk-NQ4ROOA3.js}

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // src/version.ts
 import semver from "semver";
-var VERSION = true ? "8.54.14" : "dev";
+var VERSION = true ? "8.54.15" : "dev";
 var NODE_ENGINE_RANGE = ">=22.5.0";
 function isNodeVersionSupported(version) {
   return semver.satisfies(version, NODE_ENGINE_RANGE);
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ export {
   NODE_ENGINE_RANGE,
   isNodeVersionSupported
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-BOXTTA7E.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-NQ4ROOA3.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-4I2LUNEB.js → chunk-RKQOM7EB.js}

@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ import {
   toolSuccessStructured,
   withProgressHeartbeat,
   wrapToolWithTimeout
-} from "./chunk-GOJL7V5S.js";
+} from "./chunk-2EIW5DWE.js";
 import {
   VERSION
-} from "./chunk-BOXTTA7E.js";
+} from "./chunk-NQ4ROOA3.js";
 import {
   UNRESOLVED_MODEL_ID,
   assessPanelIndependence,
@@ -92,18 +92,6 @@ import {
 // src/mcp/tools/consensus-vote.ts
 import { z as z12 } from "zod";
 
-// src/utils/bounded-artifact.ts
-function boundArtifactForReview(text, budget, label) {
-  if (text.length <= budget) {
-    return { text, note: "", bound: void 0 };
-  }
-  return {
-    text: text.slice(0, budget),
-    note: `> NOTE: partial view \u2014 you are seeing the first ${String(budget)} of ${String(text.length)} characters of the ${label}. Judge only what is shown, and treat insufficient visibility as itself a reason to raise a concern.`,
-    bound: { reviewedChars: budget, totalChars: text.length, partial: true }
-  };
-}
-
 // src/cli/voter-roles.ts
 var VOTER_ROLES = {
   architect: "Software Architect - evaluates technical design, scalability, and maintainability",
@@ -5573,6 +5561,104 @@ function applyErrorPolicy(votes, policy) {
   };
 }
 
+// src/utils/bounded-artifact.ts
+function boundArtifactForReview(text, budget, label) {
+  if (text.length <= budget) {
+    return { text, note: "", bound: void 0 };
+  }
+  return {
+    text: text.slice(0, budget),
+    note: `> NOTE: partial view \u2014 you are seeing the first ${String(budget)} of ${String(text.length)} characters of the ${label}. Judge only what is shown, and treat insufficient visibility as itself a reason to raise a concern.`,
+    bound: { reviewedChars: budget, totalChars: text.length, partial: true }
+  };
+}
+
+// src/mcp/tools/consensus-vote-contrarian.ts
+var CONTRARIAN_ESCALATION_THRESHOLD = 0.8;
+var CONTRARIAN_PROPOSAL_BUDGET = 2e3;
+function buildContrarianPrompt(bounded) {
+  return [
+    "You are a contrarian analyst. Your job is to find reasons this proposal should be REJECTED.",
+    "Look for: YAGNI (not needed), MISALIGNED (wrong tech/architecture), SECURITY_RISK, SCOPE_CREEP.",
+    "",
+    ...bounded.note === "" ? [] : [bounded.note, ""],
+    `Proposal: ${bounded.text}`,
+    "",
+    "If you find a strong reason to reject, respond with JSON:",
+    '{"decision":"reject","confidence":0.0-1.0,"reasoning":"your concern"}',
+    "If the proposal is sound, respond with:",
+    '{"decision":"approve","confidence":0.0-1.0,"reasoning":"why it is acceptable"}'
+  ].join("\n");
+}
+function logPartialProposal(bounded, log) {
+  if (bounded.bound === void 0) return;
+  log.info("Contrarian sees a partial proposal", {
+    reviewedChars: bounded.bound.reviewedChars,
+    totalChars: bounded.bound.totalChars
+  });
+}
+async function runContrarianCheck(proposal, log) {
+  try {
+    const { executeExpert } = await import("./expert-bridge-3O73XHYM.js");
+    const bounded = boundArtifactForReview(proposal, CONTRARIAN_PROPOSAL_BUDGET, "proposal");
+    logPartialProposal(bounded, log);
+    const result = await executeExpert("architecture", buildContrarianPrompt(bounded));
+    if (!result.success) return { shouldEscalate: false, reason: "", confidence: 0, errored: true };
+    const jsonMatch = result.text.match(/\{[\s\S]*\}/);
+    if (jsonMatch === null)
+      return { shouldEscalate: false, reason: "", confidence: 0, errored: false };
+    const parsed = JSON.parse(jsonMatch[0]);
+    const isRejection = parsed.decision === "reject";
+    const confidence = typeof parsed.confidence === "number" ? parsed.confidence : 0;
+    const reasoning = typeof parsed.reasoning === "string" ? parsed.reasoning : "";
+    if (isRejection && confidence >= CONTRARIAN_ESCALATION_THRESHOLD) {
+      log.info("Contrarian rejected with high confidence", {
+        confidence,
+        reasoning: reasoning.slice(0, 200)
+      });
+      return { shouldEscalate: true, reason: reasoning, confidence, errored: false };
+    }
+    return { shouldEscalate: false, reason: "", confidence, errored: false };
+  } catch (error) {
+    const message = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
+    log.warn("Contrarian check failed; defaulting to no escalation", { error: message });
+    return { shouldEscalate: false, reason: "", confidence: 0, errored: true };
+  }
+}
+async function maybeEscalateContrarian(input, outcome, ctx, logger11, opts) {
+  if (!input.quickMode || outcome !== "approved" || input.simulateVotes) {
+    return { contrarianCheck: "skipped" };
+  }
+  if (shouldEscalateLowPosterior(ctx.strategy, outcome, input.quickMode, ctx.posteriorApproval)) {
+    logger11.warn("Posterior-confidence escalation: re-running with full vote (#3174)", {
+      strategy: ctx.strategy,
+      posteriorApproval: ctx.posteriorApproval
+    });
+    return {
+      escalated: await ctx.revote({ ...input, quickMode: false }, logger11, opts),
+      contrarianCheck: "skipped"
+    };
+  }
+  const escalation = await runContrarianCheck(input.proposal, logger11);
+  const contrarianCheck = escalation.errored ? "errored" : "ok";
+  if (escalation.errored && input.errorPolicy === "absolute_quorum") {
+    logger11.warn("Contrarian check errored under absolute_quorum \u2014 degrading to no_quorum (#4132)");
+    return {
+      degradeReason: "no_quorum: re-run \u2014 contrarian check errored (absolute_quorum quick-mode)",
+      contrarianCheck
+    };
+  }
+  if (!escalation.shouldEscalate) return { contrarianCheck };
+  logger11.warn("Contrarian escalation: re-running with full vote", {
+    reason: escalation.reason,
+    confidence: escalation.confidence
+  });
+  return {
+    escalated: await ctx.revote({ ...input, quickMode: false }, logger11, opts),
+    contrarianCheck
+  };
+}
+
 // src/audit/vote-record-store.ts
 import { appendFileSync as appendFileSync2, existsSync as existsSync2, mkdirSync as mkdirSync2, readFileSync as readFileSync3 } from "node:fs";
 import { dirname as dirname2, isAbsolute as isAbsolute2, relative, resolve as resolve3, sep } from "node:path";
@@ -7831,57 +7917,6 @@ async function processVotesWithCascade(engineVotes, opts) {
   const outcome = engineResult.outcome === "approved" ? "approved" : "rejected";
   return { engineResult, voteMap, higherOrderResult, outcome, cascaded: cascadeInfo.decided };
 }
-var CONTRARIAN_ESCALATION_THRESHOLD = 0.8;
-var CONTRARIAN_PROPOSAL_BUDGET = 2e3;
-function buildContrarianPrompt(bounded) {
-  return [
-    "You are a contrarian analyst. Your job is to find reasons this proposal should be REJECTED.",
-    "Look for: YAGNI (not needed), MISALIGNED (wrong tech/architecture), SECURITY_RISK, SCOPE_CREEP.",
-    "",
-    ...bounded.note === "" ? [] : [bounded.note, ""],
-    `Proposal: ${bounded.text}`,
-    "",
-    "If you find a strong reason to reject, respond with JSON:",
-    '{"decision":"reject","confidence":0.0-1.0,"reasoning":"your concern"}',
-    "If the proposal is sound, respond with:",
-    '{"decision":"approve","confidence":0.0-1.0,"reasoning":"why it is acceptable"}'
-  ].join("\n");
-}
-function logPartialProposal(bounded, log) {
-  if (bounded.bound === void 0) return;
-  log.info("Contrarian sees a partial proposal", {
-    reviewedChars: bounded.bound.reviewedChars,
-    totalChars: bounded.bound.totalChars
-  });
-}
-async function runContrarianCheck(proposal, log) {
-  try {
-    const { executeExpert } = await import("./expert-bridge-3O73XHYM.js");
-    const bounded = boundArtifactForReview(proposal, CONTRARIAN_PROPOSAL_BUDGET, "proposal");
-    logPartialProposal(bounded, log);
-    const result = await executeExpert("architecture", buildContrarianPrompt(bounded));
-    if (!result.success) return { shouldEscalate: false, reason: "", confidence: 0, errored: true };
-    const jsonMatch = result.text.match(/\{[\s\S]*\}/);
-    if (jsonMatch === null)
-      return { shouldEscalate: false, reason: "", confidence: 0, errored: false };
-    const parsed = JSON.parse(jsonMatch[0]);
-    const isRejection = parsed.decision === "reject";
-    const confidence = typeof parsed.confidence === "number" ? parsed.confidence : 0;
-    const reasoning = typeof parsed.reasoning === "string" ? parsed.reasoning : "";
-    if (isRejection && confidence >= CONTRARIAN_ESCALATION_THRESHOLD) {
-      log.info("Contrarian rejected with high confidence", {
-        confidence,
-        reasoning: reasoning.slice(0, 200)
-      });
-      return { shouldEscalate: true, reason: reasoning, confidence, errored: false };
-    }
-    return { shouldEscalate: false, reason: "", confidence, errored: false };
-  } catch (error) {
-    const message = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
-    log.warn("Contrarian check failed; defaulting to no escalation", { error: message });
-    return { shouldEscalate: false, reason: "", confidence: 0, errored: true };
-  }
-}
 function buildPolicyShortCircuitResult(args) {
   args.logger.warn("Consensus vote short-circuited by error policy", {
     errorPolicy: args.errorPolicy,
@@ -7908,39 +7943,6 @@ function buildPolicyShortCircuitResult(args) {
     policyReason: args.reason
   };
 }
-async function maybeEscalateContrarian(input, outcome, ctx, logger11, opts) {
-  if (!input.quickMode || outcome !== "approved" || input.simulateVotes) {
-    return { contrarianCheck: "skipped" };
-  }
-  if (shouldEscalateLowPosterior(ctx.strategy, outcome, input.quickMode, ctx.posteriorApproval)) {
-    logger11.warn("Posterior-confidence escalation: re-running with full vote (#3174)", {
-      strategy: ctx.strategy,
-      posteriorApproval: ctx.posteriorApproval
-    });
-    return {
-      escalated: await executeVoting({ ...input, quickMode: false }, logger11, opts),
-      contrarianCheck: "skipped"
-    };
-  }
-  const escalation = await runContrarianCheck(input.proposal, logger11);
-  const contrarianCheck = escalation.errored ? "errored" : "ok";
-  if (escalation.errored && input.errorPolicy === "absolute_quorum") {
-    logger11.warn("Contrarian check errored under absolute_quorum \u2014 degrading to no_quorum (#4132)");
-    return {
-      degradeReason: "no_quorum: re-run \u2014 contrarian check errored (absolute_quorum quick-mode)",
-      contrarianCheck
-    };
-  }
-  if (!escalation.shouldEscalate) return { contrarianCheck };
-  logger11.warn("Contrarian escalation: re-running with full vote", {
-    reason: escalation.reason,
-    confidence: escalation.confidence
-  });
-  return {
-    escalated: await executeVoting({ ...input, quickMode: false }, logger11, opts),
-    contrarianCheck
-  };
-}
 async function executeVoting(input, logger11, opts) {
   const project = opts?.project ?? resolveAndLogVoterProject(input.project, logger11);
   const result = await executeVotingInner(input, logger11, { ...opts, project });
@@ -8020,7 +8022,7 @@ async function executeVotingInner(input, logger11, opts) {
   const escalation = await maybeEscalateContrarian(
     input,
     outcome,
-    { strategy, posteriorApproval: higherOrderResult?.posteriorApproval },
+    { strategy, posteriorApproval: higherOrderResult?.posteriorApproval, revote: executeVoting },
     logger11,
     opts
   );
@@ -8504,7 +8506,6 @@ export {
   simulationDeniedResult,
   resetCorrelationTracker,
   createPolicyFailedResult,
-  maybeEscalateContrarian,
   executeVoting,
   applyOptionGate,
   runConsensusForGoal,
@@ -8513,4 +8514,4 @@ export {
   CONSENSUS_VOTE_TOOL_SCHEMA,
   registerConsensusVoteTool
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-4I2LUNEB.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-RKQOM7EB.js.map