nexus-agents 8.47.9 → 8.47.11

package/dist/{chunk-KQBS4UW5.js → chunk-67LMMHAI.js}

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // src/version.ts
 import semver from "semver";
-var VERSION = true ? "8.47.9" : "dev";
+var VERSION = true ? "8.47.11" : "dev";
 var NODE_ENGINE_RANGE = ">=22.5.0";
 function isNodeVersionSupported(version) {
   return semver.satisfies(version, NODE_ENGINE_RANGE);
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ export {
   NODE_ENGINE_RANGE,
   isNodeVersionSupported
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-KQBS4UW5.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-67LMMHAI.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-KQBS4UW5.js.map → chunk-67LMMHAI.js.map}

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"version":3,"sources":["../src/version.ts"],"sourcesContent":["/**\n * nexus-agents - Version constant\n *\n * Injected at build time via tsup define from package.json.\n * Do NOT edit VERSION manually — it is replaced during build.\n */\n\nimport semver from 'semver';\n\ndeclare const __NEXUS_VERSION__: string;\n\nexport const VERSION: string = typeof __NEXUS_VERSION__ !== 'undefined' ? __NEXUS_VERSION__ : 'dev';\n\n/** Supported Node.js versions. Pinned to package.json by a regression test. */\nexport const NODE_ENGINE_RANGE = '>=22.5.0';\n\n/** Returns whether a Node.js version satisfies the package engine requirement. */\nexport function isNodeVersionSupported(version: string): boolean {\n  return semver.satisfies(version, NODE_ENGINE_RANGE);\n}\n"],"mappings":";AAOA,OAAO,YAAY;AAIZ,IAAM,UAAkB,OAA2C,WAAoB;AAGvF,IAAM,oBAAoB;AAG1B,SAAS,uBAAuB,SAA0B;AAC/D,SAAO,OAAO,UAAU,SAAS,iBAAiB;AACpD;","names":[]}
+{"version":3,"sources":["../src/version.ts"],"sourcesContent":["/**\n * nexus-agents - Version constant\n *\n * Injected at build time via tsup define from package.json.\n * Do NOT edit VERSION manually — it is replaced during build.\n */\n\nimport semver from 'semver';\n\ndeclare const __NEXUS_VERSION__: string;\n\nexport const VERSION: string = typeof __NEXUS_VERSION__ !== 'undefined' ? __NEXUS_VERSION__ : 'dev';\n\n/** Supported Node.js versions. Pinned to package.json by a regression test. */\nexport const NODE_ENGINE_RANGE = '>=22.5.0';\n\n/** Returns whether a Node.js version satisfies the package engine requirement. */\nexport function isNodeVersionSupported(version: string): boolean {\n  return semver.satisfies(version, NODE_ENGINE_RANGE);\n}\n"],"mappings":";AAOA,OAAO,YAAY;AAIZ,IAAM,UAAkB,OAA2C,YAAoB;AAGvF,IAAM,oBAAoB;AAG1B,SAAS,uBAAuB,SAA0B;AAC/D,SAAO,OAAO,UAAU,SAAS,iBAAiB;AACpD;","names":[]}

package/dist/{chunk-UPOY72RW.js → chunk-AKUQA3ER.js}

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import {
   toolStructuredError,
   toolSuccessStructured,
   wrapToolWithTimeout
-} from "./chunk-SNCZAGQZ.js";
+} from "./chunk-TBF46HBC.js";
 import {
   JsonlStore,
   SECURITY_KEYWORDS,
@@ -2173,4 +2173,4 @@ export {
   runImprovementReview,
   registerImprovementReviewTool
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-UPOY72RW.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-AKUQA3ER.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-J4WZDK2X.js → chunk-B7T5JDPV.js}

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import {
   NODE_ENGINE_RANGE,
   VERSION,
   isNodeVersionSupported
-} from "./chunk-KQBS4UW5.js";
+} from "./chunk-67LMMHAI.js";
 import {
   claimGlobalRegistry
 } from "./chunk-QOKB6MWY.js";
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ async function runDoctorFix(result) {
   writeLine2("\u2500".repeat(40));
   let fixCount = 0;
   if (!result.dataDirectory.rootExists || result.dataDirectory.subdirectories.some((d) => !d.exists || !d.writable)) {
-    const { initDataDirectories: initDataDirectories2, describeDataDirFix: describeDataDirFix2 } = await import("./setup-data-dir-3TOTRWJ5.js");
+    const { initDataDirectories: initDataDirectories2, describeDataDirFix: describeDataDirFix2 } = await import("./setup-data-dir-WUQEPLFM.js");
     const outcome = describeDataDirFix2(initDataDirectories2());
     writeLine2(outcome.line);
     if (outcome.counted) fixCount++;
@@ -1349,4 +1349,4 @@ export {
   startStdioServer,
   closeServer
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-J4WZDK2X.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-B7T5JDPV.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-XF2MVUCH.js → chunk-K7WLHNKH.js}

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ import {
 import {
   DEFAULT_TASK_TTL_MS,
   clampTaskTtl
-} from "./chunk-J4WZDK2X.js";
+} from "./chunk-B7T5JDPV.js";
 import {
   executeExpert
 } from "./chunk-7QY3RIIY.js";
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ import {
   toJobSummary,
   updateStage,
   writeJobCancelled
-} from "./chunk-7WZHA4DG.js";
+} from "./chunk-XFSOE2UU.js";
 import {
   allOf,
   anyOf
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ import {
 } from "./chunk-7I3LY4HJ.js";
 import {
   withPrerequisite
-} from "./chunk-UPOY72RW.js";
+} from "./chunk-AKUQA3ER.js";
 import {
   NOOP_NOTIFIER,
   RateLimiter,
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ import {
   withAuditTrail,
   withProgressHeartbeat,
   wrapToolWithTimeout
-} from "./chunk-SNCZAGQZ.js";
+} from "./chunk-TBF46HBC.js";
 import {
   createAuditTrail,
   createGraphAuditBridge,
@@ -46162,7 +46162,7 @@ function buildVotingInput(plan, config) {
 }
 async function executeSingleVote(plan, config, log) {
   try {
-    const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-MLBVGI2A.js");
+    const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-ZBAGPGOG.js");
     const input = buildVotingInput(plan, config);
     const result = await executeVoting(input, log);
     return parseVotingResult(result);
@@ -47957,7 +47957,7 @@ ${contextBlock}`;
       const strategy = config.votingStrategy ?? "higher_order";
       await postProgress(config, "Vote", `Running consensus with ${strategy} strategy...`);
       try {
-        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-MLBVGI2A.js");
+        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-ZBAGPGOG.js");
         const votingResult = await executeVoting(
           {
             proposal: buildVoteProposal(plan, research),
@@ -56698,4 +56698,4 @@ export {
   startPipelineEventBridge,
   shutdownPipelineEventBridge
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-XF2MVUCH.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-K7WLHNKH.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-SNCZAGQZ.js → chunk-TBF46HBC.js}

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 import {
   VERSION
-} from "./chunk-KQBS4UW5.js";
+} from "./chunk-67LMMHAI.js";
 import {
   emitClawGuardViolation
 } from "./chunk-JOVBHYWW.js";
@@ -2317,4 +2317,4 @@ export {
   VOTING_THRESHOLDS,
   ConsensusMetricsSchema
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-SNCZAGQZ.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-TBF46HBC.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-7WZHA4DG.js → chunk-XFSOE2UU.js}

@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ import {
   toolSuccessStructured,
   withProgressHeartbeat,
   wrapToolWithTimeout
-} from "./chunk-SNCZAGQZ.js";
+} from "./chunk-TBF46HBC.js";
 import {
   VERSION
-} from "./chunk-KQBS4UW5.js";
+} from "./chunk-67LMMHAI.js";
 import {
   assessPanelIndependence,
   countDistinctModels,
@@ -4920,7 +4920,10 @@ function toAgentVoteSummary(result) {
     reasoning: result.vote.reasoning,
     simulated: result.source === "simulation",
     error: result.source === "error",
-    ...result.vote.rejectionCategories !== void 0 ? { rejectionCategories: result.vote.rejectionCategories } : {}
+    ...result.vote.rejectionCategories !== void 0 ? { rejectionCategories: result.vote.rejectionCategories } : {},
+    // #6050: a caller acting on the live result sees what the ledger will.
+    // Present only when true, so a clean panel's response is unchanged.
+    ...result.retried === true ? { retried: true } : {}
   };
 }
 function mapOutcomeToDecision(outcome) {
@@ -5200,7 +5203,28 @@ var VoterSummarySchema = z7.object({
    */
   reasoning: z7.string().max(MAX_VOTER_REASONING_CHARS).optional(),
   /** True when `reasoning` was clipped to {@link MAX_VOTER_REASONING_CHARS}. */
-  reasoningTruncated: z7.literal(true).optional()
+  reasoningTruncated: z7.literal(true).optional(),
+  /**
+   * True when this seat was recovered by the per-role retry (#6050, schema 1.7).
+   *
+   * `voter-retry.ts` has set `retried: true` on recovered results since it was
+   * written, and `vote-types.ts` states the reason: the flag is "what makes the
+   * recovery visible instead of indistinguishable from a clean first attempt".
+   * It had one producer and ZERO consumers — both summarizers and the record
+   * dropped it — so the field existed, was documented, and never reached
+   * anything that could act on it.
+   *
+   * A retried seat is weaker evidence than a first-pass one: the model was
+   * unavailable or timed out, and the recovery ran under different conditions.
+   * For a ratification vote on a governor-path change, "7 of 7 answered" and
+   * "6 answered, 1 recovered on retry" are different facts about the scrutiny
+   * the change received, and the record stated the first for both.
+   *
+   * `literal(true)` and optional, on the `reasoningTruncated` rule: a clean
+   * seat carries no key, so its entry re-hashes byte-identical and every
+   * historical record still verifies.
+   */
+  retried: z7.literal(true).optional()
 }).strict();
 var VoteRecordCountsSchema = z7.object({
   approve: z7.number().int().nonnegative(),
@@ -5222,7 +5246,7 @@ var VoteRecordSchema = z7.object({
    * `ratifies` is folded into the self-hash ONLY when present (see
    * {@link computeVoteRecordHash}).
    */
-  version: z7.enum(["1.1", "1.2", "1.3", "1.4", "1.5", "1.6"]),
+  version: z7.enum(["1.1", "1.2", "1.3", "1.4", "1.5", "1.6", "1.7"]),
   /** Unique record id (also usable as a `ratificationVoteRef`). */
   id: z7.string().min(1),
   /**
@@ -5275,7 +5299,18 @@ var VoteRecordSchema = z7.object({
    * the EASIEST bar to clear, because every engaged voter approves while
    * choosing different things.
    */
-  optionTally: z7.array(VoteRecordOptionCountSchema).min(1).optional(),
+  // No `.min(1)` (#6049). The rule this field's own docstring states is
+  // "present only when the vote declared `options`" -- keyed on DECLARATION,
+  // not on whether anyone picked one. `.min(1)` encoded the older, narrower
+  // rule, so once the builder started emitting `[]` for "declared, nothing
+  // attributable" the record appended fine and then failed to parse on read:
+  // `too_small, minimum 1`. The write path does not validate, so the line
+  // landed in the ledger and `parseVoteRecordsText` silently dropped it --
+  // the case most worth auditing became the one no reader could see.
+  //
+  // Relaxing is a pure widening: no previously-valid record changes meaning
+  // or hash, and no persisted record can currently hold an empty tally.
+  optionTally: z7.array(VoteRecordOptionCountSchema).optional(),
   /**
    * Selection coverage for a multi-option vote (#4472, schema 1.4).
    *
@@ -5364,7 +5399,12 @@ function computeVoteRecordHash(payload) {
       decision: v.decision,
       confidence: v.confidence,
       ...v.reasoning !== void 0 ? { reasoning: v.reasoning } : {},
-      ...v.reasoningTruncated === true ? { reasoningTruncated: true } : {}
+      ...v.reasoningTruncated === true ? { reasoningTruncated: true } : {},
+      // #6050: hash-covered on the same append-when-present rule. Omitting it
+      // here would let a retried seat be edited to a clean one without moving
+      // the hash -- attesting to a claim about panel quality the chain does not
+      // actually cover.
+      ...v.retried === true ? { retried: true } : {}
     })),
     correlationId: payload.correlationId ?? null
   };
@@ -5400,7 +5440,11 @@ function toVoterSummaries(votes) {
       role: v.role,
       decision: vote.decision,
       confidence: vote.confidence,
-      ...reasoningFields(vote.reasoning)
+      ...reasoningFields(vote.reasoning),
+      // #6050: carried, not dropped. `voter-retry.ts` has set this on every
+      // recovered seat since it was written and nothing read it, so the record
+      // said "7 of 7 answered cleanly" for a panel that needed a retry.
+      ...v.retried === true ? { retried: true } : {}
     });
   }
   return summaries;
@@ -5415,14 +5459,16 @@ function reasoningFields(reasoning) {
 function recordDecisionFor(input) {
   return input.resolvedDecision ?? outcomeToDecision(input.result, input.votes, input.errorVoided ?? false);
 }
-function deriveOptionFields(votes) {
-  const optionTally = tallySelectedOptions(votes);
-  return {
-    optionTally,
-    optionCoverage: optionTally === void 0 ? void 0 : coverageOf(votes)
-  };
+function deriveOptionFields(votes, declaredOptions) {
+  const tallied = tallySelectedOptions(votes);
+  const hadOptions = declaredOptions !== void 0 && declaredOptions.length > 0;
+  if (!hadOptions && tallied === void 0) {
+    return { optionTally: void 0, optionCoverage: void 0 };
+  }
+  return { optionTally: tallied ?? [], optionCoverage: coverageOf(votes) };
 }
 function recordVersion(optionTally, optionCoverage, panelCoverage, voters) {
+  if (voters.some((v) => v.retried === true)) return "1.7";
   if (voters.some((v) => v.reasoning !== void 0)) return "1.6";
   if (panelCoverage !== void 0) return "1.5";
   if (optionCoverage !== void 0) return "1.4";
@@ -5459,7 +5505,7 @@ function tallySelectedOptions(votes) {
 }
 function buildVoteRecord(input) {
   const proposalTruncated = input.proposal.length > MAX_PROPOSAL_RECORD_CHARS ? input.proposal.slice(0, MAX_PROPOSAL_RECORD_CHARS) + "..." : input.proposal;
-  const { optionTally, optionCoverage } = deriveOptionFields(input.votes);
+  const { optionTally, optionCoverage } = deriveOptionFields(input.votes, input.declaredOptions);
   const panelCoverage = panelCoverageOf(input.votes);
   const voters = toVoterSummaries(input.votes);
   const payload = {
@@ -5777,6 +5823,7 @@ function recordAuthenticVote(args) {
     strategy: toRecordStrategy(args.strategy),
     result: args.result,
     votes: args.votes,
+    declaredOptions: args.declaredOptions,
     resolvedDecision: args.resolvedDecision,
     ...args.errorVoided !== void 0 ? { errorVoided: args.errorVoided } : {},
     ...args.correlationId !== void 0 ? { correlationId: args.correlationId } : {},
@@ -7462,13 +7509,14 @@ function finalizeVotingResult(args) {
   if (args.higherOrderResult !== void 0) result.higherOrderResult = args.higherOrderResult;
   return result;
 }
-function recordVoteSideEffects(proposal, strategy, result, logger11, ratifies) {
+function recordVoteSideEffects(proposal, strategy, result, logger11, declared) {
   const decisionId = `consensus-${String(getTimeProvider().now())}-${randomUUID2().slice(0, 8)}`;
   const voteRecord = recordAuthenticVote({
     proposal,
     strategy,
     result: result.result,
     votes: result.votes,
+    declaredOptions: declared.options,
     // #4053: an error-policy short-circuit voided the vote → the PERSISTED record
     // must record `no_quorum`, matching the MCP response (not a stale `rejected`).
     errorVoided: result.policyReason !== void 0,
@@ -7479,7 +7527,7 @@ function recordVoteSideEffects(proposal, strategy, result, logger11, ratifies) {
     // this tool reports as `no_quorum`.
     resolvedDecision: toRecordDecision(result.decision),
     correlationId: decisionId,
-    ...ratifies !== void 0 ? { ratifies } : {}
+    ...declared.ratifies !== void 0 ? { ratifies: declared.ratifies } : {}
   });
   let costSummary;
   try {
@@ -7525,7 +7573,7 @@ async function handleConsensusVote(deps, args, signal) {
       result.strategy,
       result,
       logger11,
-      args.ratifies
+      { options: args.options, ...args.ratifies !== void 0 ? { ratifies: args.ratifies } : {} }
     );
     emitVoteRejectedSignal(result.result, getPipelineEventBus(), logger11);
     return { ok: true, value: buildResponse(args, result, costSummary, voteRecord) };
@@ -7860,4 +7908,4 @@ export {
   CONSENSUS_VOTE_TOOL_SCHEMA,
   registerConsensusVoteTool
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-7WZHA4DG.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-XFSOE2UU.js.map