nexus-agents 8.126.4 → 8.126.5

package/dist/{chunk-MYAARVJH.js → chunk-3CFROGBP.js}

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ import {
 } from "./chunk-HNJTJE6A.js";
 import {
   withPrerequisite
-} from "./chunk-T2IOLXM7.js";
+} from "./chunk-5NFCIY5V.js";
 import {
   generateSecurityPlan
 } from "./chunk-I7URLQM7.js";
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ import {
 import {
   DEFAULT_TASK_TTL_MS,
   clampTaskTtl
-} from "./chunk-M2RJLD47.js";
+} from "./chunk-43YEAMED.js";
 import {
   executeExpert
 } from "./chunk-RG6DJ7FF.js";
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ import {
   withFileLock,
   withWarnings,
   writeJobCancelled
-} from "./chunk-KZOGXYW4.js";
+} from "./chunk-4N3XAYN7.js";
 import {
   NOOP_NOTIFIER,
   RateLimiter,
@@ -122,12 +122,12 @@ import {
   toolSuccessStructured,
   withProgressHeartbeat,
   wrapToolWithTimeout
-} from "./chunk-HBGFX22Q.js";
+} from "./chunk-5WSMU5OA.js";
 import {
   VERSION,
   createRequestContext,
   measuredTrustTier
-} from "./chunk-WM34GXGL.js";
+} from "./chunk-JFNPXM6W.js";
 import {
   allOf,
   anyOf
@@ -31585,12 +31585,9 @@ var CapabilityGapSummarySchema = z58.object({
   /**
    * Whether a capability-gap detector actually ran (#5919).
    *
-   * `buildBaseTaskContract` writes `allSatisfied: true` with an EMPTY
-   * `available` set — a verdict from a detector that never ran, on the
-   * `orchestrate` and `delegate_to_model` paths. Nothing reads it today, which
-   * is camouflage rather than safety: it is the same shape as #5896's
-   * ValidationHarness, where a missing consumer let a hard-coded verdict sit
-   * until someone eventually trusted it.
+   * `buildBaseTaskContract` runs the canonical detector on inferred
+   * requirements for both entry points. Its report describes registry support,
+   * not observed tool execution; inferred gaps retain their origin (#5923).
    *
    * Named for the vocabulary this repo already uses for exactly this —
    * `tokensMeasured`, `policyEvaluated`, `routerTypeMeasured`. A consumer that
@@ -32445,34 +32442,36 @@ function createDefaultPolicyEngine() {
 // src/pipeline/task-contract-builders.ts
 import { randomUUID as randomUUID9 } from "node:crypto";
 var sharedAnalyzer;
-function analyzeForContract(task) {
+function analyzeTask(task) {
   sharedAnalyzer ??= createSharedTaskAnalyzer();
-  const result = sharedAnalyzer.analyze(task);
-  return {
-    complexity: result.complexity,
-    taskType: result.taskType,
-    ambiguityScore: result.ambiguityScore
-  };
+  return sharedAnalyzer.analyze(task);
 }
 function buildBaseTaskContract(input) {
+  const analysis = analyzeTask(input.task);
+  const report = detectCapabilityGaps(analysis.requiredCapabilities);
   const now = Date.now();
   return {
     id: `${input.idPrefix}-${randomUUID9().slice(0, 8)}`,
     description: input.task,
     status: "approved",
-    analysis: input.analysis,
-    constraints: { scope: [] },
-    requiredCapabilities: { tools: [], experts: [] },
+    analysis: input.analysis ?? {
+      complexity: analysis.complexity,
+      taskType: analysis.taskType,
+      ambiguityScore: analysis.ambiguityScore
+    },
+    constraints: { ...analysis.constraints, scope: [...analysis.constraints.scope] },
+    requiredCapabilities: {
+      tools: [...analysis.requiredCapabilities.tools],
+      experts: [...analysis.requiredCapabilities.experts]
+    },
     capabilityGaps: {
-      available: { tools: [], experts: [] },
-      gaps: [],
-      // NOT a measurement (#5919). No detector runs here, so `allSatisfied`
-      // carries no information — `gapsMeasured` is what says so. Wiring
-      // `capability-gap-detector.ts` in is the follow-up; its cost on this hot
-      // path has not been measured, and asserting an unmeasured verdict is the
-      // part that had to stop now.
-      allSatisfied: true,
-      gapsMeasured: false
+      available: {
+        tools: [...report.available.tools],
+        experts: [...report.available.experts]
+      },
+      gaps: [...report.gaps],
+      allSatisfied: report.allSatisfied,
+      gapsMeasured: true
     },
     artifacts: [],
     metadata: { ...input.metadata },
@@ -32507,9 +32506,6 @@ function delegateInputToTaskContract(input, opts = {}) {
   return buildBaseTaskContract({
     idPrefix: "delegate",
     task: input.task,
-    // Derived, not asserted (#5924). This was a literal — every task through
-    // this entry point recorded `moderate/routing/0.1` whatever it actually was.
-    analysis: analyzeForContract(input.task),
     metadata
   });
 }
@@ -32599,9 +32595,6 @@ function orchestrateInputToTaskContract(input, opts = {}) {
   return buildBaseTaskContract({
     idPrefix: "orchestrate",
     task: input.task,
-    // Derived, not asserted (#5924). This was a literal — every task through
-    // this entry point recorded `high/orchestration/0.3` whatever it actually was.
-    analysis: analyzeForContract(input.task),
     metadata
   });
 }
@@ -37651,7 +37644,7 @@ var TOOL_SCHEMA = {
 function hasKeyword(text, keywords) {
   return keywords.some((k) => text.includes(k));
 }
-function analyzeTask(task) {
+function analyzeTask2(task) {
   const taskLower = task.toLowerCase();
   const estimatedTokens = Math.ceil(task.length / 4) * 2;
   return {
@@ -38060,7 +38053,7 @@ function notifyAndRecord(opts) {
 }
 async function tryCompositeRoute(deps, ctx, opts) {
   if (deps.router === void 0) return null;
-  const requirements = analyzeTask(opts.task);
+  const requirements = analyzeTask2(opts.task);
   const routerResult = await routeViaCompositeRouter(
     opts.task,
     deps.router,
@@ -38105,7 +38098,7 @@ function createDelegateHandler(deps) {
     if (compositeResult !== null) {
       return compositeResult;
     }
-    const requirements = analyzeTask(input.task);
+    const requirements = analyzeTask2(input.task);
     const billingMode = input.billing_mode ?? DEFAULTS.PROVIDER_DEFAULTS.billingMode;
     const selection = selectModel(input, requirements, billingMode);
     const output2 = buildDelegateOutput(selection, requirements);
@@ -47039,7 +47032,7 @@ function buildVotingInput(plan, config) {
 }
 async function executeSingleVote(plan, config, log) {
   try {
-    const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-UGMLPMIC.js");
+    const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-V56W3QW5.js");
     const input = buildVotingInput(plan, config);
     const result = await executeVoting(input, log);
     return parseVotingResult(result);
@@ -48186,7 +48179,7 @@ function createVoteStage({ config, startStage }) {
     const strategy = config.votingStrategy ?? "higher_order";
     await postProgress(config, "Vote", `Running consensus with ${strategy} strategy...`);
     try {
-      const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-UGMLPMIC.js");
+      const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-V56W3QW5.js");
       const proposal = buildVoteProposal(plan, research);
       const votingResult = await executeVoting(
         {
@@ -57648,7 +57641,7 @@ export {
   MODEL_CAPABILITIES2 as MODEL_CAPABILITIES,
   DelegateInputSchema,
   DelegateOutputSchema,
-  analyzeTask,
+  analyzeTask2 as analyzeTask,
   selectModel,
   registerDelegateToModelTool,
   runConsensusGate,
@@ -57804,4 +57797,4 @@ export {
   startPipelineEventBridge,
   shutdownPipelineEventBridge
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-MYAARVJH.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-3CFROGBP.js.map