nexus-agents 4.3.1 → 4.3.2

package/dist/{chunk-LSQ6TVSS.js → chunk-5HHTFAHY.js}

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ import {
   DEFAULT_TASK_TTL_MS,
   DEFAULT_TOOL_RATE_LIMITS,
   clampTaskTtl
-} from "./chunk-UZUECKIV.js";
+} from "./chunk-Z3QSRADW.js";
 import {
   executeExpert
 } from "./chunk-OYNZ6FCZ.js";
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ import {
   simulationDeniedResult,
   toJobSummary,
   writeJobCancelled
-} from "./chunk-LWB4RR47.js";
+} from "./chunk-CXA4H3PZ.js";
 import {
   allOf
 } from "./chunk-OQB3XC5O.js";
@@ -45931,7 +45931,7 @@ ${contextBlock}`;
       const strategy = config.votingStrategy ?? "higher_order";
       await postProgress(config, "Vote", `Running consensus with ${strategy} strategy...`);
       try {
-        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-3IHQNBNY.js");
+        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-EOXPISAA.js");
         const votingResult = await executeVoting(
           {
             proposal: buildVoteProposal(plan, research),
@@ -54497,4 +54497,4 @@ export {
   shutdownFeedbackSubscriber,
   createEventBusBridge
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-LSQ6TVSS.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-5HHTFAHY.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-LWB4RR47.js → chunk-CXA4H3PZ.js}

@@ -6619,7 +6619,7 @@ var CONSENSUS_VOTE_TOOL_SCHEMA = {
     "Authority-tier ratification subject (#4004) \u2014 the loop/strategy id this vote ratifies for an authority-ladder promotion. Bound into the authentic vote record so the promotion gate can verify it. Omit for ordinary votes."
   )
 };
-var CONSENSUS_VOTE_DESCRIPTION = "Execute multi-model consensus voting on a proposal. Uses 7 roles by default (architect, security, devex, ai_ml, pm, catfish, scope_steward) or 3 with quickMode (architect, security, scope_steward), voting with configurable strategies. Supports higher_order strategy for Bayesian-optimal aggregation with correlation awareness (Issue #514). Supports async mode (mode: 'async') \u2014 returns a jobId to poll via get_job_result. Pass ratifies=<subject> to bind an authority-ladder ratification vote into its authentic record. If your proposal asks voters to choose among named alternatives, you MUST pass them in `options` (#4472) \u2014 the threshold is then measured over WHICH option won, and the record carries the per-option tally plus selection coverage. WITHOUT `options` the tally is approve/reject/abstain only, so every voter who engages returns `approve` and a 6-1 split on which option persists as 7-0, 100% (#4452).";
+var CONSENSUS_VOTE_DESCRIPTION = "Execute multi-model consensus voting on a proposal. Uses 7 roles by default (architect, security, devex, ai_ml, pm, catfish, scope_steward) or 3 with quickMode (architect, security, scope_steward), voting with configurable strategies. higher_order does NOT decide the verdict by correlation-aware aggregation (#4701): approve/reject is a simple tally of the panel, so correlated voters each carry full independent weight. The Bayesian correlation analysis is computed and feeds contrarian escalation only. Choose it for the escalation behaviour, not for a weighted verdict. Supports async mode (mode: 'async') \u2014 returns a jobId to poll via get_job_result. Pass ratifies=<subject> to bind an authority-ladder ratification vote into its authentic record. If your proposal asks voters to choose among named alternatives, you MUST pass them in `options` (#4472) \u2014 the threshold is then measured over WHICH option won, and the record carries the per-option tally plus selection coverage. WITHOUT `options` the tally is approve/reject/abstain only, so every voter who engages returns `approve` and a 6-1 split on which option persists as 7-0, 100% (#4452).";
 function registerConsensusVoteTool(server, deps) {
   const logger10 = deps.logger ?? createLogger({ tool: "consensus_vote" });
   const notifier = deps.notifier ?? createMcpNotifier(server);
@@ -6728,4 +6728,4 @@ export {
   CONSENSUS_VOTE_TOOL_SCHEMA,
   registerConsensusVoteTool
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-LWB4RR47.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-CXA4H3PZ.js.map