nexus-agents 4.3.0 → 4.3.2

package/dist/{chunk-OHRCTQDC.js → chunk-5HHTFAHY.js}

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ import {
   DEFAULT_TASK_TTL_MS,
   DEFAULT_TOOL_RATE_LIMITS,
   clampTaskTtl
-} from "./chunk-D3BKW23W.js";
+} from "./chunk-Z3QSRADW.js";
 import {
   executeExpert
 } from "./chunk-OYNZ6FCZ.js";
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ import {
   simulationDeniedResult,
   toJobSummary,
   writeJobCancelled
-} from "./chunk-4WU3BGGK.js";
+} from "./chunk-CXA4H3PZ.js";
 import {
   allOf
 } from "./chunk-OQB3XC5O.js";
@@ -45931,7 +45931,7 @@ ${contextBlock}`;
       const strategy = config.votingStrategy ?? "higher_order";
       await postProgress(config, "Vote", `Running consensus with ${strategy} strategy...`);
       try {
-        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-ZRLZYJ4D.js");
+        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-EOXPISAA.js");
         const votingResult = await executeVoting(
           {
             proposal: buildVoteProposal(plan, research),
@@ -54497,4 +54497,4 @@ export {
   shutdownFeedbackSubscriber,
   createEventBusBridge
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-OHRCTQDC.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-5HHTFAHY.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-4WU3BGGK.js → chunk-CXA4H3PZ.js}

@@ -2657,8 +2657,6 @@ function createConsensusEngine(config, logger10) {
 }
 
 // src/consensus/quorum-validator.ts
-var DEFAULT_MIN_TRUST = 0.3;
-var DEFAULT_MIN_WEIGHT = 0.1;
 var QuorumValidator = class {
   logger;
   constructor(logger10) {
@@ -2676,15 +2674,9 @@ var QuorumValidator = class {
     return this.buildReachedResult(breakdown);
   }
   getQuorumBreakdown(input) {
-    const { votes, agentWeights, config, agentRecords, requiredParticipants } = input;
+    const { votes, agentWeights, config, requiredParticipants } = input;
     const voteCounts = this.countVotes(votes);
-    const eligibleAgents = this.getEligibleAgents(votes, agentRecords, config);
-    const { totalWeight, weightedCounts } = this.calculateWeights(
-      votes,
-      agentWeights,
-      agentRecords,
-      config
-    );
+    const { totalWeight, weightedCounts } = this.calculateWeights(votes, agentWeights, config);
     const { threshold, actualQuorum, quorumReached, reasoning } = this.calculateQuorumStatus(
       voteCounts,
       weightedCounts,
@@ -2700,54 +2692,9 @@ var QuorumValidator = class {
       threshold,
       actualQuorum,
       quorumReached,
-      eligibleAgents,
       reasoning
     };
   }
-  /**
-   * Decides whether an agent's vote counts, and with what weight.
-   *
-   * WIRING (#4666): this works and is tested, but **nothing in production can
-   * reach an exclusion**. The three exclusion branches all require an
-   * `AgentRecord`, and `getQuorumBreakdown`'s only production caller
-   * (`voting-protocol-helpers`) passes `{ votes, config }` with no
-   * `agentRecords` — `grep -rn agentRecords src --include=*.ts`, excluding
-   * tests and this file, returns nothing. With no record the method returns
-   * `{ eligible: true, weight: 1.0 }` on the first line.
-   *
-   * `enableByzantineDetection` additionally has zero writers anywhere in
-   * `src/`: only this read and its declaration.
-   *
-   * So `eligibleAgents` is every voter, always. Do NOT read a full eligible
-   * list as evidence that trust or Byzantine screening ran — nothing screened.
-   * Wiring it needs a producer for `AgentRecord` (trust scores, Byzantine
-   * flags), which the engine does not currently maintain.
-   *
-   * Kept rather than deleted: the behaviour is correct and covered by tests, so
-   * this is unwired capability, not dead code. Removing a working trust model
-   * is a decision about the resilience posture, not a cleanup — see #4666.
-   */
-  isAgentEligible(agentId, record, config) {
-    if (record === void 0) {
-      return { eligible: true, weight: 1 };
-    }
-    if (config.enableByzantineDetection === true && (record.byzantineFlags ?? 0) > 0) {
-      this.logger.debug("Agent flagged as Byzantine", { agentId, flags: record.byzantineFlags });
-      return { eligible: false, reason: "byzantine_flagged", weight: record.weight };
-    }
-    if (record.trustScore < DEFAULT_MIN_TRUST) {
-      this.logger.debug("Agent trust score below threshold", {
-        agentId,
-        trustScore: record.trustScore
-      });
-      return { eligible: false, reason: "low_trust", weight: record.weight };
-    }
-    if (record.weight < DEFAULT_MIN_WEIGHT) {
-      this.logger.debug("Agent weight below threshold", { agentId, weight: record.weight });
-      return { eligible: false, reason: "insufficient_weight", weight: record.weight };
-    }
-    return { eligible: true, weight: record.weight };
-  }
   countVotes(votes) {
     let approve = 0;
     let reject = 0;
@@ -2767,24 +2714,13 @@ var QuorumValidator = class {
     }
     return { approve, reject, abstain, total: votes.size };
   }
-  getEligibleAgents(votes, agentRecords, config) {
-    const eligible = [];
-    for (const agentId of votes.keys()) {
-      const record = agentRecords?.get(agentId);
-      const result = this.isAgentEligible(agentId, record, config);
-      if (result.eligible) {
-        eligible.push(agentId);
-      }
-    }
-    return eligible;
-  }
-  calculateWeights(votes, agentWeights, agentRecords, config) {
+  calculateWeights(votes, agentWeights, config) {
     if (config.algorithm === "simple_majority" || config.algorithm === "unanimous") {
       return { totalWeight: void 0, weightedCounts: void 0 };
     }
     const counts = { totalWeight: 0, approve: 0, reject: 0, abstain: 0 };
     for (const [agentId, vote] of votes.entries()) {
-      const weight = this.getVoteWeight(agentId, vote, agentWeights, agentRecords, config);
+      const weight = this.getVoteWeight(agentId, vote, agentWeights, config);
       counts.totalWeight += weight;
       this.addWeightToDecision(counts, vote.decision, weight);
     }
@@ -2798,8 +2734,8 @@ var QuorumValidator = class {
       }
     };
   }
-  getVoteWeight(agentId, vote, agentWeights, agentRecords, config) {
-    let weight = agentWeights?.get(agentId) ?? agentRecords?.get(agentId)?.weight ?? 1;
+  getVoteWeight(agentId, vote, agentWeights, config) {
+    let weight = agentWeights?.get(agentId) ?? 1;
     if (config.confidenceMultiplier === true) {
       weight *= vote.confidence;
     }
@@ -6683,7 +6619,7 @@ var CONSENSUS_VOTE_TOOL_SCHEMA = {
     "Authority-tier ratification subject (#4004) \u2014 the loop/strategy id this vote ratifies for an authority-ladder promotion. Bound into the authentic vote record so the promotion gate can verify it. Omit for ordinary votes."
   )
 };
-var CONSENSUS_VOTE_DESCRIPTION = "Execute multi-model consensus voting on a proposal. Uses 7 roles by default (architect, security, devex, ai_ml, pm, catfish, scope_steward) or 3 with quickMode (architect, security, scope_steward), voting with configurable strategies. Supports higher_order strategy for Bayesian-optimal aggregation with correlation awareness (Issue #514). Supports async mode (mode: 'async') \u2014 returns a jobId to poll via get_job_result. Pass ratifies=<subject> to bind an authority-ladder ratification vote into its authentic record. If your proposal asks voters to choose among named alternatives, you MUST pass them in `options` (#4472) \u2014 the threshold is then measured over WHICH option won, and the record carries the per-option tally plus selection coverage. WITHOUT `options` the tally is approve/reject/abstain only, so every voter who engages returns `approve` and a 6-1 split on which option persists as 7-0, 100% (#4452).";
+var CONSENSUS_VOTE_DESCRIPTION = "Execute multi-model consensus voting on a proposal. Uses 7 roles by default (architect, security, devex, ai_ml, pm, catfish, scope_steward) or 3 with quickMode (architect, security, scope_steward), voting with configurable strategies. higher_order does NOT decide the verdict by correlation-aware aggregation (#4701): approve/reject is a simple tally of the panel, so correlated voters each carry full independent weight. The Bayesian correlation analysis is computed and feeds contrarian escalation only. Choose it for the escalation behaviour, not for a weighted verdict. Supports async mode (mode: 'async') \u2014 returns a jobId to poll via get_job_result. Pass ratifies=<subject> to bind an authority-ladder ratification vote into its authentic record. If your proposal asks voters to choose among named alternatives, you MUST pass them in `options` (#4472) \u2014 the threshold is then measured over WHICH option won, and the record carries the per-option tally plus selection coverage. WITHOUT `options` the tally is approve/reject/abstain only, so every voter who engages returns `approve` and a 6-1 split on which option persists as 7-0, 100% (#4452).";
 function registerConsensusVoteTool(server, deps) {
   const logger10 = deps.logger ?? createLogger({ tool: "consensus_vote" });
   const notifier = deps.notifier ?? createMcpNotifier(server);
@@ -6792,4 +6728,4 @@ export {
   CONSENSUS_VOTE_TOOL_SCHEMA,
   registerConsensusVoteTool
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-4WU3BGGK.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-CXA4H3PZ.js.map