nexus-agents 3.6.0 → 3.6.2

package/dist/{chunk-LOS63AKL.js → chunk-BLTZBQDX.js}

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ import {
   DEFAULT_TASK_TTL_MS,
   DEFAULT_TOOL_RATE_LIMITS,
   clampTaskTtl
-} from "./chunk-Y33P5D4B.js";
+} from "./chunk-TAIHTIMF.js";
 import {
   executeExpert
 } from "./chunk-56GTITUT.js";
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ import {
   simulationDeniedResult,
   toJobSummary,
   writeJobCancelled
-} from "./chunk-Z4NDPKGT.js";
+} from "./chunk-NRRH254O.js";
 import {
   normalizeTopicToCanonical,
   synthesizeResearch
@@ -45878,7 +45878,7 @@ ${contextBlock}`;
       const strategy = config.votingStrategy ?? "higher_order";
       await postProgress(config, "Vote", `Running consensus with ${strategy} strategy...`);
       try {
-        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-FOXNWPYK.js");
+        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-TALT6GHT.js");
         const votingResult = await executeVoting(
           {
             proposal: buildVoteProposal(plan, research),
@@ -54255,4 +54255,4 @@ export {
   shutdownFeedbackSubscriber,
   createEventBusBridge
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-LOS63AKL.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-BLTZBQDX.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-Z4NDPKGT.js → chunk-NRRH254O.js}

@@ -4650,7 +4650,8 @@ function buildResponse(input, result, costSummary, voteRecord) {
       approverCount: g.approverCount,
       selectedCount: g.selectedCount,
       unattributedApprovals: g.unattributedApprovals,
-      thresholdMet: g.approved
+      thresholdMet: g.approved,
+      ...g.reason !== void 0 ? { vetoReason: g.reason } : {}
     };
   }
   applyOptionalResponseFields(response, input, result, errorCount, costSummary);
@@ -6274,12 +6275,12 @@ function applyOptionGate(input, result) {
     optionThresholdFor(result.strategy, input.threshold),
     result.result.outcome === "approved"
   );
-  result.optionGate = outcome.verdict;
-  if (!outcome.vetoed) return;
-  result.result.outcome = "rejected";
-  if (result.policyReason === void 0 && outcome.reason !== void 0) {
-    result.policyReason = outcome.reason;
+  if (!outcome.vetoed) {
+    result.optionGate = outcome.verdict;
+    return;
   }
+  result.result.outcome = "rejected";
+  result.optionGate = outcome.reason !== void 0 ? { ...outcome.verdict, reason: outcome.reason } : outcome.verdict;
 }
 async function executeVotingInner(input, logger10, opts) {
   const strategy = resolveStrategy(input);
@@ -6609,7 +6610,11 @@ var CONSENSUS_VOTE_OUTPUT_SCHEMA = {
     approverCount: z10.number().int().nonnegative(),
     selectedCount: z10.number().int().nonnegative(),
     unattributedApprovals: z10.number().int().nonnegative(),
-    thresholdMet: z10.boolean()
+    thresholdMet: z10.boolean(),
+    // #4529: present only on a veto. Declared here because a strict MCP
+    // client rejects any property the advertised schema omits — the same
+    // drift that made degraded-panel votes unusable before #4032.
+    vetoReason: z10.string().max(400).optional()
   }).optional()
 };
 var CONSENSUS_VOTE_TOOL_SCHEMA = {
@@ -6732,10 +6737,11 @@ export {
   createPolicyFailedResult,
   maybeEscalateContrarian,
   executeVoting,
+  applyOptionGate,
   runConsensusForGoal,
   unwrapVoteOrThrow,
   CONSENSUS_VOTE_OUTPUT_SCHEMA,
   CONSENSUS_VOTE_TOOL_SCHEMA,
   registerConsensusVoteTool
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-Z4NDPKGT.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-NRRH254O.js.map