nexus-agents 3.1.0 → 3.1.1

package/dist/{chunk-4UN4M4NI.js → chunk-5UFRDLQT.js}

@@ -4321,12 +4321,14 @@ function getDefaultErrorPolicy(strategy) {
   return "reduce_denominator";
 }
 var ConsensusVoteInputSchema = z6.object({
-  proposal: z6.string().min(1).max(MAX_PROPOSAL_LENGTH).describe("Proposal text to vote on"),
+  proposal: z6.string().min(1).max(MAX_PROPOSAL_LENGTH).describe(
+    "Proposal text to vote on. IMPORTANT (#4452): the tally records approve/reject/abstain ONLY. If your proposal asks voters to choose among named options (A/B/C), every voter who engages returns `approve`, so the result records as unanimous even when the panel disagreed about WHICH option \u2014 a 6-1 split persists as 7-0, 100%. Threshold semantics invert too: `unanimous` becomes trivially easy to clear, because everyone approves while choosing different things. Prefer a single yes/no question; if you must offer options, read each voter's `reasoning` to recover the real split and do NOT report the recorded percentage as agreement."
+  ),
   threshold: VoteThresholdSchema.optional().describe(
     "Voting threshold (legacy): majority, supermajority, unanimous. Use strategy instead."
   ),
   strategy: VotingStrategySchema.optional().describe(
-    "Voting strategy: simple_majority (default), supermajority, unanimous, proof_of_learning, or higher_order (Bayesian-optimal)"
+    "Voting strategy: simple_majority (default), supermajority, unanimous, proof_of_learning, or higher_order (Bayesian-optimal). NOTE (#4452): thresholds are evaluated over approve/reject/abstain, not over which option a voter chose. On a multi-option proposal even `unanimous` clears trivially \u2014 see the `proposal` field description."
   ),
   errorPolicy: ErrorPolicySchema.optional().describe(
     "How to treat voters that errored or timed out (#2630). Default: fail_closed for unanimous only; reduce_denominator for all other strategies incl. higher_order/opinion_wise (#3138 \u2014 a single infra timeout should not void an otherwise-unanimous vote). Opt-in absolute_quorum (#4132): an errored voter \u2014 especially the contrarian (catfish) \u2014 degrades the verdict to no_quorum (recoverable re-run) instead of being dropped from the denominator; never manufactures approved/rejected from an induced error. Regardless of policy, errors > 50% always fails."
@@ -6359,7 +6361,7 @@ var CONSENSUS_VOTE_TOOL_SCHEMA = {
     "Authority-tier ratification subject (#4004) \u2014 the loop/strategy id this vote ratifies for an authority-ladder promotion. Bound into the authentic vote record so the promotion gate can verify it. Omit for ordinary votes."
   )
 };
-var CONSENSUS_VOTE_DESCRIPTION = "Execute multi-model consensus voting on a proposal. Uses 7 roles by default (architect, security, devex, ai_ml, pm, catfish, scope_steward) or 3 with quickMode (architect, security, scope_steward), voting with configurable strategies. Supports higher_order strategy for Bayesian-optimal aggregation with correlation awareness (Issue #514). Supports async mode (mode: 'async') \u2014 returns a jobId to poll via get_job_result. Pass ratifies=<subject> to bind an authority-ladder ratification vote into its authentic record.";
+var CONSENSUS_VOTE_DESCRIPTION = "Execute multi-model consensus voting on a proposal. Uses 7 roles by default (architect, security, devex, ai_ml, pm, catfish, scope_steward) or 3 with quickMode (architect, security, scope_steward), voting with configurable strategies. Supports higher_order strategy for Bayesian-optimal aggregation with correlation awareness (Issue #514). Supports async mode (mode: 'async') \u2014 returns a jobId to poll via get_job_result. Pass ratifies=<subject> to bind an authority-ladder ratification vote into its authentic record. CAVEAT (#4452): the tally is approve/reject/abstain only. A proposal that asks voters to pick among named options records as unanimous even when they picked DIFFERENT options \u2014 recover the real split from each voter's reasoning, and do not report the percentage as agreement.";
 function registerConsensusVoteTool(server, deps) {
   const logger10 = deps.logger ?? createLogger({ tool: "consensus_vote" });
   const notifier = deps.notifier ?? createMcpNotifier(server);
@@ -6466,4 +6468,4 @@ export {
   CONSENSUS_VOTE_OUTPUT_SCHEMA,
   registerConsensusVoteTool
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-4UN4M4NI.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-5UFRDLQT.js.map