nexus-agents 2.92.1 → 2.92.2

package/dist/{chunk-ZNR3ZVC6.js → chunk-3HVSXLPL.js}

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ import {
 } from "./chunk-CH7QIDHQ.js";
 
 // src/version.ts
-var VERSION = true ? "2.92.1" : "dev";
+var VERSION = true ? "2.92.2" : "dev";
 
 // src/config/schemas-core.ts
 import { z } from "zod";
@@ -2096,7 +2096,7 @@ async function runDoctorFix(result) {
   writeLine2("\u2500".repeat(40));
   let fixCount = 0;
   if (!result.dataDirectory.rootExists || result.dataDirectory.subdirectories.some((d) => !d.exists || !d.writable)) {
-    const { runSetup } = await import("./setup-command-AZAWBZOP.js");
+    const { runSetup } = await import("./setup-command-BMELLUUX.js");
     const setupResult = runSetup({
       skipMcp: true,
       skipRules: true,
@@ -2208,4 +2208,4 @@ export {
   startStdioServer,
   closeServer
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-ZNR3ZVC6.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-3HVSXLPL.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-G3CYK3WA.js → chunk-F47QKVPH.js}

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ import {
   writeJobComplete,
   writeJobFailed,
   writeJobPending
-} from "./chunk-4N54BTZU.js";
+} from "./chunk-UYOHV3EG.js";
 import {
   REGISTRY_PATH,
   getProjectRoot,
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ import {
   DEFAULT_TASK_TTL_MS,
   DEFAULT_TOOL_RATE_LIMITS,
   clampTaskTtl
-} from "./chunk-ZNR3ZVC6.js";
+} from "./chunk-3HVSXLPL.js";
 import {
   getAvailabilityCache,
   resolveFallback
@@ -43548,7 +43548,7 @@ ${contextBlock}`;
       const strategy = config.votingStrategy ?? "higher_order";
       await postProgress(config, "Vote", `Running consensus with ${strategy} strategy...`);
       try {
-        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-B6W7YQ6K.js");
+        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-VSRNSZ5J.js");
         const votingResult = await executeVoting(
           {
             proposal: plan.slice(0, 4e3),
@@ -51876,4 +51876,4 @@ export {
   detectBackend,
   createTaskTracker
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-G3CYK3WA.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-F47QKVPH.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-4N54BTZU.js → chunk-UYOHV3EG.js}

@@ -7990,6 +7990,9 @@ function buildResponse(input, result) {
   if (input.threshold !== void 0) {
     response.threshold = input.threshold;
   }
+  if (result.policyReason !== void 0) {
+    response.policyReason = result.policyReason;
+  }
   if (result.strategy === "higher_order" && result.higherOrderResult) {
     response.higherOrderMetadata = {
       posteriorApproval: result.higherOrderResult.posteriorApproval,
@@ -8971,15 +8974,27 @@ function createEmptyConsensusResult(proposal, algorithm) {
     durationMs: 0
   };
 }
-function createPolicyFailedResult(proposal, algorithm, reason) {
+function createPolicyFailedResult(proposal, algorithm, reason, votes) {
   const now = (/* @__PURE__ */ new Date()).toISOString();
+  const voteMap = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
+  let approve = 0;
+  let reject = 0;
+  let abstain = 0;
+  for (const v of votes) {
+    if (v.source === "error") continue;
+    voteMap.set(v.role, v.vote);
+    if (v.vote.decision === "approve") approve++;
+    else if (v.vote.decision === "reject") reject++;
+    else abstain++;
+  }
+  const responding = approve + reject + abstain;
   return {
     proposalId: "error-policy-short-circuit",
     proposal: { title: `MCP Consensus Vote \u2014 ${reason}`, description: proposal, algorithm },
     outcome: "rejected",
-    votes: /* @__PURE__ */ new Map(),
-    voteCounts: { approve: 0, reject: 0, abstain: 0, total: 0 },
-    approvalPercentage: 0,
+    votes: voteMap,
+    voteCounts: { approve, reject, abstain, total: responding },
+    approvalPercentage: responding > 0 ? approve / responding * 100 : 0,
     quorumReached: false,
     startedAt: now,
     closedAt: now,
@@ -9134,11 +9149,14 @@ function buildPolicyShortCircuitResult(args) {
   return {
     proposal: args.input.proposal,
     threshold: args.algorithm,
-    result: createPolicyFailedResult(args.input.proposal, args.algorithm, args.reason),
+    result: createPolicyFailedResult(args.input.proposal, args.algorithm, args.reason, args.votes),
     votes: args.votes,
     totalTimeMs,
     simulateVotes: args.input.simulateVotes,
-    strategy: args.strategy
+    strategy: args.strategy,
+    // #3124: surface WHY a high-approval result is still 'rejected' so callers
+    // don't mistake a fail-closed policy short-circuit for a genuine rejection.
+    policyReason: args.reason
   };
 }
 async function maybeEscalateContrarian(input, outcome, logger11, opts) {
@@ -9433,7 +9451,10 @@ var CONSENSUS_VOTE_OUTPUT_SCHEMA = {
     improvementOverBaseline: z12.number(),
     downweightedAgents: z12.array(z12.string().max(100)).max(10),
     reasoning: z12.string().max(2e3)
-  }).optional()
+  }).optional(),
+  // #3124: explains a `rejected` decision that coexists with a high
+  // approvalPercentage (an error-policy short-circuit, e.g. fail_closed).
+  policyReason: z12.string().max(200).optional()
 };
 function registerConsensusVoteTool(server, deps) {
   const logger11 = deps.logger ?? createLogger({ tool: "consensus_vote" });
@@ -9599,8 +9620,9 @@ export {
   ConsensusVoteInputSchema,
   warnIfSimulatedOutsideTests,
   resetCorrelationTracker,
+  createPolicyFailedResult,
   executeVoting,
   CONSENSUS_VOTE_OUTPUT_SCHEMA,
   registerConsensusVoteTool
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-4N54BTZU.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-UYOHV3EG.js.map