nexus-agents 2.29.2 → 2.30.0

package/dist/{chunk-QGODFK36.js → chunk-4IEUUQ4G.js}

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ async function dispatchWithRateLimitRetry(router, task, expertType, start) {
 async function executeExpert(expertType, prompt) {
   const start = getTimeProvider().now();
   try {
-    const { BUILT_IN_EXPERTS } = await import("./expert-config-MQ5OJE3U.js");
+    const { BUILT_IN_EXPERTS } = await import("./expert-config-BTPAEZWV.js");
     const config = BUILT_IN_EXPERTS[expertType];
     const fullPrompt = `${config.systemPrompt}
 
@@ -119,4 +119,4 @@ ${prompt}`;
 export {
   executeExpert
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-QGODFK36.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-4IEUUQ4G.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-J245RJGW.js → chunk-6CHMHPT4.js}

@@ -12346,7 +12346,7 @@ async function processVotesWithCascade(votes, opts) {
 var CONTRARIAN_ESCALATION_THRESHOLD = 0.8;
 async function runContrarianCheck(proposal, log) {
   try {
-    const { executeExpert } = await import("./expert-bridge-J36C7VES.js");
+    const { executeExpert } = await import("./expert-bridge-5KVWX44T.js");
     const prompt = [
       "You are a contrarian analyst. Your job is to find reasons this proposal should be REJECTED.",
       "Look for: YAGNI (not needed), MISALIGNED (wrong tech/architecture), SECURITY_RISK, SCOPE_CREEP.",
@@ -12716,4 +12716,4 @@ export {
   CONSENSUS_VOTE_OUTPUT_SCHEMA,
   registerConsensusVoteTool
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-J245RJGW.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-6CHMHPT4.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-WSYJN7BI.js → chunk-CD64JT3I.js}

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ import {
 } from "./chunk-CLYZ7FWP.js";
 
 // src/version.ts
-var VERSION = true ? "2.29.2" : "dev";
+var VERSION = true ? "2.30.0" : "dev";
 
 // src/cli/setup-data-dir.ts
 import { mkdirSync, existsSync as existsSync2 } from "fs";
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ async function runDoctorFix(result) {
   writeLine2("\u2500".repeat(40));
   let fixCount = 0;
   if (!result.dataDirectory.rootExists || result.dataDirectory.subdirectories.some((d) => !d.exists || !d.writable)) {
-    const { runSetup } = await import("./setup-command-CMCQRBJF.js");
+    const { runSetup } = await import("./setup-command-QIHX7ZVJ.js");
     const setupResult = runSetup({
       skipMcp: true,
       skipRules: true,
@@ -836,4 +836,4 @@ export {
   startStdioServer,
   closeServer
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-WSYJN7BI.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-CD64JT3I.js.map

package/dist/{chunk-QSNAFOE6.js → chunk-FXX5UQCK.js}

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ import {
   toolSuccessStructured,
   withProgressHeartbeat,
   wrapToolWithTimeout
-} from "./chunk-J245RJGW.js";
+} from "./chunk-6CHMHPT4.js";
 import {
   REGISTRY_PATH,
   getProjectRoot,
@@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ import {
   BuiltInExpertTypeSchema,
   ExpertConfigSchema,
   getSecurityKnowledgePrompt
-} from "./chunk-LDIN2PLV.js";
+} from "./chunk-GJVHRJO2.js";
 import {
   DEFAULT_TASK_TTL_MS,
   clampTaskTtl
-} from "./chunk-WSYJN7BI.js";
+} from "./chunk-CD64JT3I.js";
 import {
   createSessionMemory
 } from "./chunk-KQIDTE52.js";
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ import {
 } from "./chunk-66NNHMVB.js";
 import {
   executeExpert
-} from "./chunk-QGODFK36.js";
+} from "./chunk-4IEUUQ4G.js";
 import {
   ClaudeCliAdapter,
   CliDetectionCache,
@@ -9997,7 +9997,12 @@ When reviewing web-facing code, check for presence and correctness of these head
 - Do not flag test files for containing fake secrets (they use FAKE_* constants by design)
 - Do not report generic OWASP findings without codebase-specific evidence
 - Validate that referenced files and line numbers actually exist
-- Do not propose security changes that break existing canonical paths`;
+- Do not propose security changes that break existing canonical paths
+
+### Push-Back Cues
+- Findings are inherently negative evidence: never assert "no vulnerability" by default \u2014 instead state the scope that was audited and what remains unchecked
+- If the user asks you to sign off on a component without source access, refuse and request the source or an SBOM
+- Confidence <0.6 when audit relied on static patterns without dynamic verification`;
 
 // src/agents/experts/expert-prompts/testing-expert.ts
 var TESTING_EXPERT_BASE_PROMPT = `You are a testing expert specializing in test-driven development, test automation, and quality assurance.
@@ -10104,7 +10109,12 @@ Respond with JSON matching this structure:
 - Do not generate tests that exceed max-lines-per-function (50) without extracting helpers
 - Do not recommend _ prefix for unused variables \u2014 ESLint still flags them; use destructuring guards
 - Do not assert exact timing values \u2014 use toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0) for duration assertions
-- Validate that test target functions and modules actually exist before generating tests`;
+- Validate that test target functions and modules actually exist before generating tests
+
+### Push-Back Cues
+- If a function has >10 edge cases, cover the happy path + 1 critical edge case and flag the remaining branches for a dedicated fuzz / property-based run instead of writing 10 hand-rolled tests
+- If the user asks for "100% coverage" on a non-critical module, push back and recommend branch coverage on critical paths only
+- Confidence <0.6 when recommending a test strategy without first reading the existing test structure`;
 
 // src/agents/experts/expert-prompts/code-expert.ts
 var SHARED_CORE = `## Core Principles
@@ -10411,7 +10421,17 @@ Respond with JSON matching this structure:
 - Do not claim features that do not exist in the codebase
 - Do not create parallel documentation indexes (only docs/README.md is canonical)
 - Validate that referenced file paths and function names actually exist
-- Do not exaggerate capabilities or use vague marketing language`;
+- Do not exaggerate capabilities or use vague marketing language
+
+### Task Scope Management
+- If the request touches >5 docs, prioritize Tier 1 (canonical architecture/security) docs first and return a deferred list for the rest
+- For large doc refactors, land one tier at a time and update \`docs/README.md\` as you go \u2014 never orphan new docs
+- Split cross-topic changes into per-topic PRs so reviewers stay within one area
+
+### Push-Back Cues
+- If asked to document a feature that doesn't exist in code, refuse and surface the mismatch \u2014 do not write aspirational docs
+- If a doc claim would require speculation about future behavior, mark it clearly or omit it
+- Confidence <0.6 when writing about a subsystem without first reading its canonical source file`;
 
 // src/agents/experts/expert-prompts/prompt-composer.ts
 var MAX_TASK_DESCRIPTION_LENGTH = 500;
@@ -40862,7 +40882,7 @@ var VALID_TEMPLATES = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set([
 ]);
 async function classifyWithLLM(task) {
   try {
-    const { executeExpert: executeExpert2 } = await import("./expert-bridge-J36C7VES.js");
+    const { executeExpert: executeExpert2 } = await import("./expert-bridge-5KVWX44T.js");
     const prompt = [
       "Classify this task into exactly one pipeline template.",
       "Templates: dev (implementation/bug fix/refactor), research (investigate/evaluate/compare),",
@@ -41850,7 +41870,7 @@ ${contextBlock}`;
       const strategy = config.votingStrategy ?? "higher_order";
       await postProgress(config, "Vote", `Running consensus with ${strategy} strategy...`);
       try {
-        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-COW34Q2Y.js");
+        const { executeVoting } = await import("./consensus-vote-5PFFDRLR.js");
         const votingResult = await executeVoting(
           {
             proposal: plan.slice(0, 4e3),
@@ -53012,4 +53032,4 @@ export {
   detectBackend,
   createTaskTracker
 };
-//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-QSNAFOE6.js.map
+//# sourceMappingURL=chunk-FXX5UQCK.js.map