newtype-profile 1.0.10 → 1.0.11

package/dist/cli/index.js

@@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ var require_picocolors = __commonJS((exports, module) => {
 var require_package = __commonJS((exports, module) => {
   module.exports = {
     name: "newtype-profile",
-    version: "1.0.10",
+    version: "1.0.11",
     description: "AI Agent Collaboration System for Content Creation - Based on oh-my-opencode",
     main: "dist/index.js",
     types: "dist/index.d.ts",

package/dist/hooks/chief-orchestrator/confidence-router.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/**
+ * Confidence-based routing for fact-check results
+ *
+ * Parses confidence scores from fact-checker output and generates
+ * routing recommendations for the orchestrator.
+ */
+export interface ConfidenceResult {
+    confidence: number | null;
+    recommendation: "pass" | "polish" | "rewrite" | null;
+    directive: string | null;
+}
+/**
+ * Extract confidence score from fact-checker output
+ * Looks for pattern: **CONFIDENCE: X.XX**
+ */
+export declare function extractConfidence(output: string): number | null;
+/**
+ * Determine routing recommendation based on confidence score
+ */
+export declare function getRecommendation(confidence: number): "pass" | "polish" | "rewrite";
+/**
+ * Build routing directive for Chief based on confidence
+ */
+export declare function buildConfidenceDirective(confidence: number, sessionId: string): string;
+/**
+ * Analyze fact-check output and generate routing result
+ */
+export declare function analyzeFactCheckOutput(output: string, sessionId: string): ConfidenceResult;
+/**
+ * Check if output is from a fact-check task
+ */
+export declare function isFactCheckOutput(output: string): boolean;

package/dist/hooks/chief-orchestrator/confidence-router.test.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+export {};

package/dist/index.js

@@ -22893,6 +22893,77 @@ function clearTrackerForSession(sessionId) {
   sessionTrackers.delete(sessionId);
 }
 
+// src/hooks/chief-orchestrator/confidence-router.ts
+function extractConfidence(output) {
+  const match = output.match(/\*\*CONFIDENCE:\s*(\d+\.?\d*)\*\*/i);
+  if (match) {
+    const value = parseFloat(match[1]);
+    if (!isNaN(value) && value >= 0 && value <= 1) {
+      return value;
+    }
+  }
+  return null;
+}
+function getRecommendation(confidence) {
+  if (confidence >= 0.8) {
+    return "pass";
+  } else if (confidence >= 0.5) {
+    return "polish";
+  } else {
+    return "rewrite";
+  }
+}
+function buildConfidenceDirective(confidence, sessionId) {
+  const recommendation = getRecommendation(confidence);
+  const confidencePercent = Math.round(confidence * 100);
+  switch (recommendation) {
+    case "pass":
+      return `[FACT-CHECK PASSED]
+Confidence: ${confidencePercent}% (HIGH)
+Action: Content verified. Ready for delivery.`;
+    case "polish":
+      return `[FACT-CHECK: NEEDS POLISH]
+Confidence: ${confidencePercent}% (MEDIUM)
+Action: Send to Editor for refinement.
+
+REQUIRED: Call chief_task with:
+  category="editing"
+  prompt="Polish the content based on fact-check feedback. Address minor uncertainties while preserving verified claims."
+  resume="${sessionId}"`;
+    case "rewrite":
+      return `[FACT-CHECK: NEEDS REWRITE]
+Confidence: ${confidencePercent}% (LOW)
+Action: Significant issues found. Send back to Writer.
+
+REQUIRED: Call chief_task with:
+  category="writing"  
+  prompt="Rewrite the content addressing the fact-check issues. Focus on: [list specific issues from fact-check report]"
+  resume="${sessionId}"
+
+NOTE: Max 2 rewrite attempts. If still failing after 2 rewrites, escalate to user.`;
+  }
+}
+function analyzeFactCheckOutput(output, sessionId) {
+  const confidence = extractConfidence(output);
+  if (confidence === null) {
+    return {
+      confidence: null,
+      recommendation: null,
+      directive: null
+    };
+  }
+  const recommendation = getRecommendation(confidence);
+  const directive = buildConfidenceDirective(confidence, sessionId);
+  return {
+    confidence,
+    recommendation,
+    directive
+  };
+}
+function isFactCheckOutput(output) {
+  return output.includes("CONFIDENCE:") || output.toLowerCase().includes("fact-check") || output.includes("\u6838\u67E5") || output.includes("verification");
+}
+
 // src/hooks/chief-orchestrator/index.ts
 var HOOK_NAME6 = "chief-orchestrator";
 var ALLOWED_PATH_PREFIX2 = ".chief/";
@@ -23465,12 +23536,28 @@ ${buildOrchestratorReminder(boulderState.plan_name, progress, subagentSessionId)
           const category = categoryMatch?.[1];
           const summarized = summarizeOutput(output.output, { category });
           const formattedSummary = formatSummarizedOutput(summarized);
+          let confidenceDirective = "";
+          if (isFactCheckOutput(output.output)) {
+            const confidenceResult = analyzeFactCheckOutput(output.output, subagentSessionId);
+            if (confidenceResult.directive) {
+              confidenceDirective = `
+
+---
+${confidenceResult.directive}
+---`;
+              log(`[${HOOK_NAME6}] Confidence routing detected`, {
+                sessionID: input.sessionID,
+                confidence: confidenceResult.confidence,
+                recommendation: confidenceResult.recommendation
+              });
+            }
+          }
           output.output = `${formattedSummary}
 
 ${progressTable}
 
 ${fileChanges ? `
-${fileChanges}` : ""}
+${fileChanges}` : ""}${confidenceDirective}
 <system-reminder>
 ${buildStandaloneVerificationReminder(subagentSessionId)}
 </system-reminder>`;
@@ -44501,7 +44588,22 @@ Approach:
 - Official documents over media reports
 - Academic/peer-reviewed over informal
 - Note confidence levels for each claim
-</Category_Context>`;
+</Category_Context>
+
+<Output_Format>
+CRITICAL: You MUST end your response with a confidence score in this EXACT format:
+
+---
+**CONFIDENCE: X.XX**
+
+Where X.XX is a number between 0.00 and 1.00:
+- 0.90-1.00: All claims verified with authoritative sources
+- 0.70-0.89: Most claims verified, minor uncertainties
+- 0.50-0.69: Some claims unverified or conflicting sources
+- 0.00-0.49: Significant issues, major claims unverified or false
+
+This score determines whether the content passes review or needs revision.
+</Output_Format>`;
 var ARCHIVE_CATEGORY_PROMPT_APPEND = `<Category_Context>
 You are working on ARCHIVE/KNOWLEDGE-BASE tasks.
 
@@ -44582,11 +44684,11 @@ Approach:
 </Category_Context>`;
 var DEFAULT_CATEGORIES = {
   research: {
-    model: "google/antigravity-gemini-3-pro-high",
+    model: "google/antigravity-gemini-3-flash",
     temperature: 0.5
   },
   "fact-check": {
-    model: "google/antigravity-gemini-3-pro-high",
+    model: "google/antigravity-gemini-3-flash",
     temperature: 0.2
   },
   archive: {

package/dist/tools/chief-task/constants.d.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 import type { CategoryConfig } from "../../config/schema";
 export declare const RESEARCH_CATEGORY_PROMPT_APPEND = "<Category_Context>\nYou are working on RESEARCH tasks.\n\n\u60C5\u62A5\u5458 (Researcher) mindset:\n- Broad, comprehensive information gathering\n- Multiple source triangulation\n- Identify emerging trends and patterns\n- Surface unexpected connections\n- Prioritize recency and relevance\n\nApproach:\n- Cast a wide net first\n- Synthesize findings into actionable insights\n- Flag contradictions or uncertainties\n- Provide source attribution\n</Category_Context>";
-export declare const FACT_CHECK_CATEGORY_PROMPT_APPEND = "<Category_Context>\nYou are working on FACT-CHECKING tasks.\n\n\u6838\u67E5\u5458 (Fact-Checker) mindset:\n- Rigorous source verification\n- Cross-reference multiple authoritative sources\n- Identify potential biases or conflicts of interest\n- Assess credibility and reliability\n- Flag unverifiable claims\n\nApproach:\n- Primary sources over secondary\n- Official documents over media reports\n- Academic/peer-reviewed over informal\n- Note confidence levels for each claim\n</Category_Context>";
+export declare const FACT_CHECK_CATEGORY_PROMPT_APPEND = "<Category_Context>\nYou are working on FACT-CHECKING tasks.\n\n\u6838\u67E5\u5458 (Fact-Checker) mindset:\n- Rigorous source verification\n- Cross-reference multiple authoritative sources\n- Identify potential biases or conflicts of interest\n- Assess credibility and reliability\n- Flag unverifiable claims\n\nApproach:\n- Primary sources over secondary\n- Official documents over media reports\n- Academic/peer-reviewed over informal\n- Note confidence levels for each claim\n</Category_Context>\n\n<Output_Format>\nCRITICAL: You MUST end your response with a confidence score in this EXACT format:\n\n---\n**CONFIDENCE: X.XX**\n\nWhere X.XX is a number between 0.00 and 1.00:\n- 0.90-1.00: All claims verified with authoritative sources\n- 0.70-0.89: Most claims verified, minor uncertainties\n- 0.50-0.69: Some claims unverified or conflicting sources\n- 0.00-0.49: Significant issues, major claims unverified or false\n\nThis score determines whether the content passes review or needs revision.\n</Output_Format>";
 export declare const ARCHIVE_CATEGORY_PROMPT_APPEND = "<Category_Context>\nYou are working on ARCHIVE/KNOWLEDGE-BASE tasks.\n\n\u8D44\u6599\u5458 (Archivist) mindset:\n- Deep knowledge of existing repository content\n- Find connections between documents\n- Identify gaps and duplications\n- Maintain organizational coherence\n- Surface relevant historical context\n\nApproach:\n- Thorough local search first\n- Map relationships between content\n- Suggest categorization improvements\n- Preserve institutional knowledge\n</Category_Context>";
 export declare const WRITING_CATEGORY_PROMPT_APPEND = "<Category_Context>\nYou are working on WRITING/CONTENT-CREATION tasks.\n\n\u5199\u624B (Writer) mindset:\n- Engaging, reader-focused prose\n- Clear structure and flow\n- Appropriate voice and tone\n- Balance of depth and accessibility\n- Original perspectives and insights\n\nApproach:\n- Understand audience and purpose\n- Outline before drafting\n- Show, don't just tell\n- Support claims with evidence\n- Iterate for clarity and impact\n</Category_Context>";
 export declare const EDITING_CATEGORY_PROMPT_APPEND = "<Category_Context>\nYou are working on EDITING/REFINEMENT tasks.\n\n\u7F16\u8F91 (Editor) mindset:\n- Preserve author's voice while improving clarity\n- Ruthless about unnecessary words\n- Logical flow and coherence\n- Consistency in style and terminology\n- Reader experience first\n\nApproach:\n- Big picture structure first\n- Then paragraph-level coherence\n- Finally sentence-level polish\n- Explain significant changes\n</Category_Context>";

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "newtype-profile",
-  "version": "1.0.10",
+  "version": "1.0.11",
   "description": "AI Agent Collaboration System for Content Creation - Based on oh-my-opencode",
   "main": "dist/index.js",
   "types": "dist/index.d.ts",